Randomized, crossover trial: comparing the effects of standardized egg-white meal and Vital® on global gastric emptying parameters and intragastric meal distribution in healthy Asian participants.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Measurements of gastric emptying and accommodation for alternative test-meal protocol during gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), such as high-calorie nutrient drinks, are not fully established. We aimed to compare the effects of standardized egg-white meal (EWM) versus high-calorie nutrient drink (Vital®; Abbott Laboratories) on global GES parameters and intragastric meal distribution at immediate scan (IMD0h). METHODS: Of 84 screened participants, 60 asymptomatic healthy Asian population (38 females; 24.0 ± 1.5 years; 23.8 ± 2.6 kg/m2) were recruited in this 2 × 2 (AB/BA) crossover trial. Participants were randomized to a 4-h GES with 99mTc-radiolabeled EWM (~255.8 kcal), followed by a 200 mL Vital® (300 kcal), or vice versa, separated by a 2-week washout period. Global meal retention (GMR), power-exponential model emptying parameters (half-emptying [T1/2], lag phases [Tlag2%, Tlag5%, Tlag10%]), and IMD0h were determined and compared. RESULTS: GMRs for both test meals were within the international standard references for solid GES. Compared to EWM, Vital® exhibited significantly lower GMRs (faster emptying) from 0.5 to 3 h (all P < 0.001) but comparable at 4 h (P = 0.153). Similar observations were found for the model-based T1/2 and the different Tlag thresholds (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, IMD0h was found to be lower with Vital®, indicating lower gastric accommodation (faster antral filling) immediately post-ingestion (P < 0.001). Both test meals showed significant moderate-to-strong positive associations at the late-phase GE (GMR 2-4 h, T1/2) (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, Vital® is an acceptable alternative test meal to the EWM for GES; however, exercise caution when interpreting early-phase GE. The normative values for global GES parameters and IMD0h are also established.

Assessing impaired gastric accommodation in children with functional constipation using the water load test.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate gastric accommodation in pediatric patients with functional constipation using the water load test. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional case-control study. Herein, the water load test results of children aged >4 years with functional constipation referred to a Pediatric Gastroenterology Outpatient Clinic (functional constipation group) were compared with those of a control group (without functional constipation or chronic abdominal pain) recruited from two public schools. Clinical manifestations outlined in the Rome IV criteria were used to diagnose functional constipation. Water load tests were performed after 3 h of fasting. For the test, the participants were asked to drink as much water as possible in 3 min. KEY RESULTS: A total of 36 patients and 77 students were included in the functional constipation and control groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in age between the groups (8.6 ± 2.3 years and 8.8 ± 1.8 years in the functional constipation and control groups, respectively). The water load test showed intake volumes of 390 ± 245 mL and 528 ± 219 mL in the functional constipation and control groups, respectively (p = 0.001). The maximum volume in the water load test correlated with the 24 h daily intake of energy (rS = +0.42, p = 0.012), protein (rS = +0.48, p = 0.004), and water (rS = +0.39, p = 0.020) only in the group with functional constipation. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: According to the water load test, gastric accommodation was impaired in children with severe functional constipation. The impairment of gastric accommodation in children with severe functional constipation is related to food intake.

2023 update on the clinical management of gastroparesis.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroparesis is characterized by symptoms suggesting gastric retention of food and objective evidence of delayed gastric emptying in the absence of a mechanical obstruction. Nausea, vomiting, early satiety, and postprandial fullness are the classic symptoms of gastroparesis. Gastroparesis is increasingly encountered by physicians. There are several recognized etiologies of gastroparesis, including diabetic, post-surgical, medication-induced, post-viral, and idiopathic. AREAS COVERED: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify studies discussing gastroparesis management. Dietary modifications, medication adjustments, glucose control, antiemetic agents, and prokinetic agents are all part of gastroparesis management. In this manuscript, we detail treatments evolving for gastroparesis, including nutritional, pharmaceutical, device, and recent advanced endoscopic and surgical therapies. This manuscript concludes with a speculative viewpoint on how the field will evolve in 5 years' time. EXPERT OPINION: Identification of the dominant symptoms (fullness, nausea, abdominal pain, and heartburn) helps to direct management efforts of the patients. Treatments for refractory (treatment resistant) symptoms may include gastric electric stimulation and intra-pyloric interventions like botulinum toxin and endoscopic pyloromyotomy. Understanding the pathophysiology of gastroparesis, relating pathophysiologic abnormalities to specific symptoms, new efficacious pharmacotherapies, and better understanding of the clinical predictors of response of therapies, are priorities for future research in the field of gastroparesis.

Electroacupuncture Enhances Gastric Accommodation via the Autonomic and Cytokine Mechanisms in Functional Dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Due to complex pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia, medications to treat functional dyspepsia are not effective for all patients. Transcutaneous electrical acustimulation (TEA) is an potentially effective therapy for functional dyspepsia without proofs of definite mechanisms. AIMS: We aimed to investigate the therapeutic impacts of TEA on postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and explore potential neuroimmune mechanisms. METHODS: We conducted a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial in 30 PDS patients randomized for 4-week TEA or sham-TEA. Dyspeptic symptoms, gastric accommodation, gastric emptying and heart rate variability (HRV) were assessed. Duodenal mucosal inflammation was also evaluated. RESULTS: The dyspeptic symptoms were improved with TEA compared with sham-TEA (P = 0.03). The initial satiety volume and the maximum tolerable volume (MTV) were both improved after the TEA treatment, compared with the sham-TEA group (P all < 0.05). The gastric emptying time (T1/2) was not altered with TEA or sham-TEA. The TEA treatment increased vagal activity and decreased sympathovagal ratio assessed by HRV (P all < 0.01). The IL-6 expression in bulb mucosa was downregulated by the TEA treatment compared to the baseline (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive TEA improves gastric accommodation and dyspeptic symptoms, possibly by downregulating the IL-6 expression in duodenal bulb mucosa via the vagal efferent pathway.

Postprandial symptoms in patients with symptoms of gastroparesis: roles of gastric emptying and accommodation.

Patients often are evaluated for gastroparesis because of symptoms occurring with meals. Gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) is used for gastroparesis diagnosis, although results are not well correlated with gastroparesis symptoms. The aim of this study is to assess relationships between gastroparesis symptoms, gastric emptying (GE), and gastric accommodation (GA). Patients with symptoms of gastroparesis completed the Patient Assessment of Upper GI Symptoms (PAGI-SYM) and recorded symptoms during GES and water load satiety test (WLST), an indirect assessment for GA. A total of 109 patients with gastroparesis symptoms were assessed. Symptom severity increased after GES meal for stomach fullness, belching, nausea, abdominal burning, and abdominal pain. There was no difference in symptoms after meal between patients with delayed (n = 66) and normal (n = 42) GE. Diabetic patients (n = 26) had greater gastric retention than idiopathic patients (n = 78), but idiopathic patients had greater postprandial nausea, stomach fullness, and abdominal pain. Water consumed during WLST averaged 421 ± 245 mL. Idiopathic patients had greater nausea scores during WLST than diabetic patients. In comparison to those with normal water consumption (≥238 mL; n = 80), patients with impaired water ingestion (<238 mL; n = 26) had increased stomach fullness, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and loss of appetite on PAGI-SYM. Patients with delayed and normal GE had similar symptom profiles during GES and WLST. Idiopathic patients had less gastric retention but more symptoms after GES meal and after WLST compared with diabetic patients. Patients with impaired water consumption during WLST had increased symptoms by PAGI-SYM. These data suggest that impaired GA, rather than GE, may be important in explaining postprandial symptoms in patients with symptoms of gastroparesis.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Patients with delayed and normal gastric emptying (GE) had similar symptom profiles during gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES). Idiopathic patients with symptoms of gastroparesis had less gastric retention by GES; but more symptoms after GES meal and after water load satiety test (WLST) compared with diabetic patients. In patients with symptoms of gastroparesis, symptoms after WLST increased with decreasing water consumption. Early satiety and loss of appetite were associated with decreased water consumption during WLST. Thus, impaired accommodation and perhaps visceral hypersensitivity are important in explaining postprandial symptoms in gastroparesis.

Gastroparesis.

Gastroparesis is characterized by symptoms suggestive of, and objective evidence of, delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. This review addresses the normal emptying of solids and liquids from the stomach and details the myogenic and neuromuscular control mechanisms, including the specialized function of the pyloric sphincter, that result in normal emptying, based predominantly on animal research. A clear understanding of fundamental mechanisms is necessary to comprehend derangements leading to gastroparesis, and additional research on human gastric muscles is needed. The section on pathophysiology of gastroparesis considers neuromuscular diseases that affect nonsphincteric gastric muscle, disorders of the extrinsic neural control, and pyloric dysfunction that lead to gastroparesis. The potential cellular basis for gastroparesis is attributed to the effects of oxidative stress and inflammation, with increased pro-inflammatory and decreased resident macrophages, as observed in full-thickness biopsies from patients with gastroparesis. Predominant diagnostic tests involving measurements of gastric emptying, the use of a functional luminal imaging probe, and high-resolution antral duodenal manometry in characterizing the abnormal motor functions at the gastroduodenal junction are discussed. Management is based on supporting nutrition; dietary interventions, including the physical reduction in particle size of solid foods; pharmacological agents, including prokinetics and anti-emetics; and interventions such as gastric electrical stimulation and pyloromyotomy. These are discussed briefly, and comment is added on the potential for individualized treatments in the future, based on optimal gastric emptying measurement and objective documentation of the underlying pathophysiology causing the gastroparesis.

Gastric accommodation: Physiology, diagnostic modalities, clinical relevance, and therapies.

BACKGROUND: Gastric accommodation is an essential gastric motor function which occurs following ingestion of a meal. Impaired gastric fundic accommodation (IFA) is associated with dyspeptic symptoms. Gastric accommodation is mediated by the vagal pathway with several important physiologic factors such as duodenal nutrient feedback playing a significant role. IFA has been described as a pathophysiologic factor in several gastrointestinal disorders including functional dyspepsia, diabetic gastropathy, post-Nissen fundoplication, postsurgical gastrectomy, and rumination syndrome. Modalities for gastric accommodation assessment include gastric barostat, intragastric meal distribution via scintigraphy, drinking tests (eg, water load), SPECT, MRI, 2D and 3D ultrasound, and intragastric high-resolution manometry. Several treatment options including sumatriptan, buspirone, tandospirone, ondansetron, and acotiamide may improve symptoms by increasing post-meal gastric volume. PURPOSE: Our aim is to provide an overview of the physiology, diagnostic modalities, and therapies for IFA. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and other sources to identify relevant studies available until December 2020. Gastric accommodation is an important gastric motor function which if impaired, is associated with several upper gastrointestinal disorders. There are an increasing number of gastric accommodation testing modalities; however, each has facets which warrant consideration. Evidence regarding potentially effective therapies for IFA is growing.

Supraphysiological effects of pancreatic polypeptide on gastric motor function and nutrient tolerance in humans.

Pancreatic polypeptide (PP) is known to affect food intake. In this exploratory study, we set out to investigate its supraphysiological effect on food tolerance, gastric accommodation, and emptying. In 12 healthy volunteers, 0, 3, or 10 pmol*kg-1 *min-1 PP was administered intravenously (PP0, PP3 or PP10). Thirty minutes thereafter, nutrient drink infusion (60 ml*min-1 ) through a nasogastric feeding tube was started until maximum satiation. Gastric accommodation was assessed by measuring the intragastric pressure (IGP; nasogastric manometry). In a separate test, the effect of PP0 or PP10 on gastric emptying was tested in 10 healthy volunteers and assessed using the 13 C breath test. Results are presented as mean ± SEM, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. For the IGP test, PP increased ingested nutrient volume: 886 ± 93, 1059 ± 124, and 1025 ± 125 ml for PP0, PP3, and PP10, respectively (p = 0.048). In all groups, Nadir IGP values were reached upon food intake (transformed values: 1.5 ± 0.2, 1.7 ± 0.3, and 1.6 ± 0.3 mmHg for PP0, PP3, and PP10, respectively; NS) to return to baseline thereafter. For the gastric emptying study, volunteers ingested a similar nutrient volume: 802 ± 119 and 1089 ± 128 ml (p = 0.016), and gastric half-emptying time was 281 ± 52 and 249 ± 37 min for PP0 and PP10, respectively (NS). No significant correlation between tolerated nutrient volume and IGP drop (R² < 0.01; p = 0.88 for PP0 vs. PP3 and R² =0.07; p = 0.40 for PP0 vs. PP10, respectively) or gastric half-emptying time (R² = 0.12; p = 0.32) was found. A supraphysiological PP dose enhances food tolerance; however, this effect is not mediated through gastric motility. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT03854708 is obtained from clinicaltrials.gov.

The gastrointestinal tract in hunger and satiety signalling.

BACKGROUND: Different peripheral pathways are implicated in the regulation of the food ingestion-digestion cycle. METHODS: Narrative review on gastrointestinal mechanisms involved in satiety and hunger signalling. RESULTS: Combined mechano- and chemoreceptors, peripherally released peptide hormones and neural pathways provide feedback to the brain to determine sensations of hunger (increase energy intake) or satiation (cessation of energy intake) and regulate the human metabolism. The gastric accommodation reflex, which consists of a transient relaxation of the proximal stomach during food intake, has been identified as a major determinant of meal volume, through activation of tension-sensitive gastric mechanoreceptors. Motilin, whose release is the trigger of gastric Phase 3, has been identified as the major determinant of return of hunger after a meal. In addition, the release of several peptide hormones such as glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), cholecystokinin as well as motilin and ghrelin contributes to gut-brain signalling with relevance to control of hunger and satiety. A number of nutrients, such as bitter tastants, as well as pharmacological agents, such as endocannabinoid receptor antagonists and GLP-1 analogues act on these pathways to influence hunger, satiation and food intake. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal mechanisms such as gastric accommodation and motilin release are key determinants of satiety and hunger.

Effect of Oral CNSA-001 (sepiapterin, PTC923) on gastric accommodation in women with diabetic gastroparesis: A randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 trial.

AIMS: Diabetic gastroparesis may be associated with impaired nitric oxide metabolism and reduced tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) synthesis. Oral treatment with CNSA-001 (sepiapterin, currently known as PTC923) increased BH4 levels in humans in a previous study. This Phase 2 study evaluated CNSA-001 in women with diabetic gastroparesis. METHODS: Non-pregnant diabetic women with moderate/severe symptomatic gastroparesis, delayed gastric emptying, and impaired gastric accommodation (nutrient satiety testing) were randomized to 10mg/kg BID CNSA-001 or matching placebo for 14days. The primary endpoint was change in gastric accommodation (maximal tolerated liquid meal volume) at 14- and 28-days' follow-up. RESULTS: Gastric accommodation improved in CNSA-001-treated vs. placebo-treated subjects at 28days (least squares mean [LSM] difference: 98 [95% CI 36 to 161], p=0.0042). Subjects' ratings of bloating, fullness, nausea, and pain were lower vs. baseline in the CNSA-001 group at 14 and 28days, though these improvements were not observed consistently in placebo-treated subjects. There were no significant group differences in upper gastrointestinal symptom scores, and in gastric emptying breath test parameters. CNSA-001 was well tolerated, with no withdrawals for adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: CNSA-001 improved gastric accommodation in women with diabetic gastroparesis. Further evaluation of CNSA-001 in gastroparesis is warranted; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03712124.

Gastric Sensory and Motor Functions and Energy Intake in Health and Obesity-Therapeutic Implications.

Sensory and motor functions of the stomach, including gastric emptying and accommodation, have significant effects on energy consumption and appetite. Obesity is characterized by energy imbalance; altered gastric functions, such as rapid gastric emptying and large fasting gastric volume in obesity, may result in increased food intake prior to reaching usual fullness and increased appetite. Thus, many different interventions for obesity, including different diets, anti-obesity medications, bariatric endoscopy, and surgery, alter gastric functions and gastrointestinal motility. In this review, we focus on the role of the gastric and intestinal functions in food intake, pathophysiology of obesity, and obesity management.

The effect of prucalopride on gastric sensorimotor function and satiation in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Gastric motor function alterations have been implicated in the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia with postprandial distress syndrome (PDS). Prucalopride, a 5-TH4 agonist, is known to stimulate gastrointestinal motility. We aimed to evaluate the effect of prucalopride on gastric sensorimotor function in healthy subjects (HV). METHODS: Barostat and intragastric pressure (IGP) measurements were performed in 17 HV (59% females, age 29.4 ± 2.7 y) after treatment with placebo or prucalopride (2 mg) (single-blind cross-over). Isobaric stepwise distensions and gastric sensations were assessed to determine gastric compliance and sensitivity. Gastric accommodation (GA) with the barostat was quantified before and after ingestion of 200 ml of a nutrient drink (ND). GA measured by IGP was quantified as the drop of IGP from baseline during the intragastric infusion of ND until maximal satiation (60 ml/min). KEY RESULTS: Prucalopride did not affect barostat assessed gastric compliance or sensitivity. No differences were observed in GA after prucalopride. During the barostat study, 10 min after the meal, 7 HVs reported significantly higher ratings for nausea after prucalopride (p < 0.001), and vomiting was induced in 4 of the HVs. A positive correlation was observed between the delta mean perception of nausea with the delta mean increase of intra-balloon volume before and after meal ingestion (r = 0.37, p = 0.03). During IGP measurements, no effect on nutrient tolerance was observed and increased cramp severity scores were observed which were associated with a significant increase of distal IGP (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Prucalopride does not enhances gastric accommodation but it might increase sensitivity to gastric distention. Furthermore, the increase in sensitivity seems to be related to an increase in nausea with distension. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04429802.

Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation improves functional dyspepsia by enhancing vagal efferent activity.

This study was designed to investigate whether transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) would be able to improve major pathophysiologies of functional dyspepsia (FD) in patients with FD. Thirty-six patients with FD (21 F) were studied in two sessions (taVNS and sham-ES). Physiological measurements, including gastric slow waves, gastric accommodation, and autonomic functions, were assessed by the electrogastrogram (EGG), a nutrient drink test and the spectral analysis of heart rate variability derived from the electrocardiogram (ECG), respectively. Thirty-six patients with FD (25 F) were randomized to receive 2-wk taVNS or sham-ES. The dyspeptic symptom scales, anxiety and depression scores, and the same physiological measurements were assessed at the beginning and the end of the 2-wk treatment. In comparison with sham-ES, acute taVNS improved gastric accommodation (P = 0.008), increased the percentage of normal gastric slow waves (%NSW, fasting: P = 0.010; fed: P = 0.007) and vagal activity (fasting: P = 0.056; fed: P = 0.026). In comparison with baseline, 2-wk taVNS but not sham-ES reduced symptoms of dyspepsia (P = 0.010), decreased the scores of anxiety (P = 0.002) and depression (P < 0.001), and improved gastric accommodation (P < 0.001) and the %NSW (fasting: P < 0.05; fed: P < 0.05) by enhancing vagal efferent activity (fasting: P = 0.015; fed: P = 0.048). Compared with the HC, the patients showed increased anxiety (P < 0.001) and depression (P < 0.001), and decreased gastric accommodation (P < 0.001) and %NSW (P < 0.001) as well as decreased vagal activity (fasting: P = 0.047). The noninvasive taVNS has a therapeutic potential for treating nonsevere FD by improving gastric accommodation and gastric pace-making activity via enhancing vagal activity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Treatment of functional dyspepsia is difficult due to various pathophysiological factors. The proposed method of transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation improves symptoms of both dyspepsia and depression/anxiety, and gastric functions (accommodation and slow waves), possibly mediated via the enhancement of vagal efferent activity. This noninvasive and easy-to-implement neuromodulation method will be well received by patients and healthcare providers.

Impact of joint hypermobility syndrome on gastric accommodation and nutrient tolerance in functional dyspepsia.

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is defined as the presence of gastroduodenal symptoms in the absence of organic disease that is likely to explain the symptoms. Joint hypermobility (JH) refers to the increased passive or active movement of a joint beyond its normal range and is characteristically present in patients with joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS), which is a hypermobile subtype of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). Recent reports have highlighted the co-existence of FD with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Our aim was to study the prevalence of JHS in FD compared with healthy subjects and to study the impact of co-existing JHS on gastric motility, nutrient tolerance, and dyspeptic symptoms in FD. METHODS: FD patients filled out a dyspepsia symptom severity score. Intragastric pressure (IGP) was measured with high-resolution manometry (HRM) during the intragastric infusion of nutrition drink (ND, 1.5 Kcal/ml, 60 ml/min) until maximal satiation in healthy subjects and FD. We compared IGP profiles and nutrient tolerance in HS and FD with or without JHS. RESULTS: JHS was present in 54% of FD patients (n = 39, 41.2 ± 2.2 years old) and 7% of healthy subjects (n = 15, 27.3 ± 2.3 years old). IGP drop and nutrient tolerance were lower in non-JHS-FD compared with JHS-FD and HS (AUC JHS-FD: -17.9 ± 2.5 vs. non-JHS-FD: -13.0 ± 3.3 mmHg min, p = 0.2, HS:-19.6 ± 2.9 mmHg min; ND tolerance non-JHS-FD: 671.0 ± 96.0 vs. JHS-FD: 842.7 ± 105.7 Kcal, p = 0.25, HS: 980.0 ± 108.1 Kcal). CONCLUSION: JHS often co-exists with FD. Non-JHS-FD was characterized by decreased accommodation and lower nutrient tolerance characterized compared with JHS-FD. Clinicaltrials.gov, reference number NCT04279990.

Management of Gastroparesis.

Gastroparesis is a gastrointestinal motility disorder characterized by nausea, vomiting, early satiation, postprandial fullness, bloating, and upper abdominal pain. The diagnosis requires documented delay in gastric emptying with an optimal test such as scintigraphy or stable isotope gastric emptying breath test in the absence of mechanical obstruction. The pathophysiologic mechanisms of gastroparesis are multifactorial, including antroduodenal hypomotility, pylorospasm, impaired gastric accommodation, and visceral hypersensitivity. The etiologies of gastroparesis are broad, but the most common subtypes are idiopathic, diabetic, and postsurgical. Less frequent etiologies are neurodegenerative disorder (Parkinson disease), myopathies (scleroderma, amyloidosis), and neoplastic syndrome. Symptoms of gastroparesis can be refractory and challenging to manage, leading to reduced quality of life and significant health care expenditure. This article introduces the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and differential diagnoses of gastroparesis, followed by a focused discussion on its management, including nutritional support, prokinetic and antiemetic agents, and emerging interventions directed at the pylorus. Robust sham-controlled trials are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy. A multidisciplinary approach with individualized strategies based on characterization of the patho-physiology is deemed necessary to enhance clinical outcomes.

Functional dyspepsia in children: A study of pathophysiological factors.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is common in children, and treatment targeted towards the altered pathophysiology can improve outcome. We evaluated FD children for abnormality of gastric accommodation and emptying, psychological stressors (PS), Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, and post-infectious FD. METHODS: Diagnosis of FD was based on ROME III criteria. Clinical evaluation including dyspeptic symptom scoring and assessment for PS was performed. Satiety drink test for gastric accommodation, gastroscopy with biopsy for HP infection, and solid meal gastric emptying were performed. Sixty-seven healthy children were enrolled for assessing PS and satiety drink test. RESULTS: Fifty-five FD children (33 boys, age 12 [6-18] years) with symptoms for 4 (2-48) months and dyspeptic score of 5 (1-13) were enrolled. PS were more common in FD than in controls (46/55 vs 9/67; P < 0.001). Median satiety drink volume was 360 mL (180-1320 mL); no patients had satiety drink volume of < 5th centile of healthy children. The frequency (98% vs 85%; P = 0.01) and severity (65 [10-175] vs 50 [5-130]; P < 0.001) of postprandial symptoms were higher in FD than in controls. Of the postprandial symptoms, pain (20.3% vs 0%; P = 0.000) was present only in FD. Delayed gastric emptying was present in 6.5%, HP infection in 11%, and post-infectious FD in 13% cases. Etiological factor was identified in 87% children, with 20% having multiple factors. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormality of gastric sensorimotor function is seen in one-fourth of FD cases. HP infection and post-infectious FD are present in 11% and 13% cases, respectively.

Acute Effects of Red Chili, a Natural Capsaicin Receptor Agonist, on Gastric Accommodation and Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Healthy Volunteers and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients.

The effects of chili on gastric accommodation (GA) in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients have not been explored. METHODS: In total, 15 healthy volunteers (HV) and 15 pH-positive non-erosive GERD (NERD) patients underwent single-photon emission computed tomography after ingesting 2 g of chili or placebo in capsules in a randomized double-blind crossover fashion with a one-week washout period. GA was the maximal postprandial gastric volume (GV) after 250 mL of Ensure® minus the fasting GV. Upper gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated by using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: NERD patients but not HV had significantly greater GA after chili compared to a placebo (451 ± 89 vs. 375 ± 81 mL, p < 0.05). After chili, the postprandial GVs at 10, 20, and 30 min in NERD patients were significantly greater than HV (10 min, 600 ± 73 vs. 526 ± 70 mL; 20 min, 576 ± 81 vs. 492 ± 78 mL; 30 min, 532 ± 81 vs. 466 ± 86 mL, all p < 0.05). In NERD, chili was associated with significantly less satiety, more severe abdominal burning (p < 0.05), and a trend of more severe heartburn (p = 0.06) compared to the placebo. In HV, postprandial symptoms after chili and placebo ingestion were similar (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chili enhanced GA in NERD patients but not in HV. This suggests that the modulation of GA in NERD is abnormal and likely involves transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) sensitive pathways.

A Pilot Study Examining the Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Blockade Using Exendin-(9,39) on Gastric Emptying and Caloric Intake in Subjects With and Without Bariatric Surgery.

Background: Obesity causes significant morbidity and mortality and continues to be a significant public health concern. Unfortunately, lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy do not produce durable results. This has led to bariatric surgical procedures playing an increasingly prominent role in the management of medically complicated obesity. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy are the most commonly performed bariatric surgeries in North America and produce mechanical restriction with accelerated gastrointestinal transit accompanied by increased postprandial secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). GLP-1 is a gastrointestinal hormone that delays gastric emptying and causes satiety and weight loss. This raises the possibility that the postprandial rise in GLP-1 might affect feeding behavior over and above the mechanical restriction produced by bariatric surgery. Methods: We, therefore, sought to determine the effects of GLP-1 receptor blockade using exendin-9,39-a competitive antagonist of the actions of GLP-1 at its receptor-on caloric intake and gastrointestinal transit in subjects after sleeve gastrectomy and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared with weight-matched controls. Results: GLP-1 receptor blockade did not alter caloric intake in people after bariatric surgery. However, caloric intake was decreased in age-, weight- and sex-matched control subjects, and the mechanisms require further study. Conclusions: Given the known effects of GLP-1 on gastric accommodation, future studies should ascertain effects of GLP-1 receptor blockade on gastric accommodation, which might be a useful and novel strategy to decrease caloric intake in humans with an intact upper gastrointestinal tract. The Clinical Trial Resigtration number is NCT02779075.

Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Gastric Structure and Function Documented by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Are Strongly Associated with Post-operative Weight Loss and Quality of Life: a Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study applied magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on gastric structure and function. The impact of these changes on patient outcomes was analyzed. METHOD: Obese patients without gastrointestinal symptoms referred for bariatric surgery were recruited prospectively. Pre-operative assessment included (i) high-resolution manometry and pH-impedance monitoring and (ii) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement of gastric capacity, accommodation, and emptying with the 400 ml liquid Nottingham test meal (NTM). Studies were repeated 6-7 months after LSG. Weight loss and changes in the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) assessed patient outcomes. RESULTS: From 35 patients screened, 23 (66%) completed the study (17 females, age 36 ± 10 years, BMI 42 ± 5 kg/m2). Mean excess weight loss was 59 ± 18% at follow-up. Total gastric volume (capacity) after the meal was 467 mL (455-585 ml) before and 139 mL (121-185 ml) after LSG (normal reference 534 (419-675) mL), representing a mean 70% reduction (p < 0.0001). Similar findings were present for gastric content volume indicating rapid early-phase gastric emptying (GE) post-LSG. Conversely, late-phase GE was slower post-LSG (2.5 ± 1.0 vs. 1.4 ± 0.6 mL/min; p < 0.0001; (reference 1.5(1.4-4.9) mL/min)). Patients with ≥ 80% reduction in gastric capacity had greater weight loss (p = 0.008), but worse gastrointestinal outcomes (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: MRI studies quantified the marked reduction in gastric capacity after LSG. The reduction in capacity was associated with rapid early- but slow late-phase GE after surgery. These changes were associated with weight loss; however, reductions in gastric capacity ≥ 80% were linked to increased acid reflux and impacted on gastrointestinal quality of life.

Enhancing Scintigraphy for Evaluation of Gastric, Small Bowel, and Colonic Motility.

This article reviews the latest enhancements in standards and technology for performing gastric emptying and associated small bowel and colon transit scintigraphic studies. It discusses how developments in appropriate use criteria, American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology coding, and advanced commercial software permit clinicians to obtain more comprehensive physiologic studies of gastric, small bowel, and colon gastrointestinal motility disorders. It shows how gastrointestinal scintigraphy has expanded to permit assessments of global and regional (fundic and antral) gastric motility and how it permits a single study (whole-gut transit scintigraphy), including measurement of solid and liquid gastric emptying and small bowel and colon transit.