Liver Pseudotumor Due to Aberrant Left Gastric Vein: A Case Report.

Liver pseudotumors (pseudolesions) pose diagnostic challenges in imaging, often linked to anomalous venous drainage. Notably, aberrant left gastric vein (ALGV) plays a role in segment 2 and 3 pseudolesions. A liver parenchymal pseudolesion due to abnormal venous drainage involving ALGV is highlighted. Understanding hepatic vascular dynamics, exemplified by ALGV-related pseudolesions, aids diagnosis and guides decisions. Further investigating intricate mechanisms underlying these anomalies is crucial. Teaching Point: The recognition of third inflow pathways such as ALGV holds significance in distinguishing hepatic pseudolesions from true lesions.

Aberrant left gastric vein: what should surgeons know?

PURPOSE: Aberrant left gastric vein is a rare variant and hardly known by surgeons. Its misidentification may lead to accidental bleeding. More importantly, it can also be the root of hypertensive gastropathy in cirrhotic patients and tumor spread in patients with gastric cancer. Here, we describe and provide imaging data of the three patterns of aberrant left gastric veins. METHODS: Over the past 5 years, three cases were noted, each one corresponding to one of the three variants. RESULTS: Aberrant left gastric vein is a rare anatomical entity and has rarely been reported. Its normal anatomy and variants, embryological origins, radiological analysis, and clinical implications are all discussed, bringing light to what surgeons should know when encountering an aberrant left gastric vein. CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be aware of the types of ALGV, its associated arterial variations, the presence of pseudolesion or not, and the potential atrophy of liver segment.

Left Gastric Vein Width Is an Important Risk Factor for Exacerbation of Esophageal Varices Post Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration for Gastric Varices in Cirrhotic Patients.

Background and Objectives: Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) could be currently one of the best therapies for patients with gastric varices. This study examined the exacerbation rates for esophageal varices following BRTO for gastric varices in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 91 cirrhotic patients who underwent BRTO for gastric varices. In total, 50 patients were examined for exacerbation rates of esophageal varices following BRTO. Esophageal varices and their associated exacerbation were evaluated by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients were allocated into two groups according to the main inflow tract for gastric varices: (1) 37 patients in the left gastric vein (LGV) group with an LGV width of more than 3.55 mm, and (2) 13 patients in the non-LGV group who had short gastric vein or posterior gastric vein. Moreover, treatment outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Results: LGV width (p < 0.01) was the major risk factor for the deterioration of esophageal varices post BRTO. In addition, LGV was the most common inflow tract, and the LGV group contained 74% (37/50) of patients. The exacerbation rates of esophageal varices at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years post BRTO were 40%, 62%, 65%, and 68%, respectively. The comparison of the exacerbation rates for esophageal varices following BRTO according to inflow tract showed that the exacerbation rates were significantly higher in the LGV group than those of the non-LGV group (p = 0.03). In more than half of the subjects, LGV was the main inflow tract for gastric varices, and this group experienced more frequent exacerbations of esophageal varices following BRTO compared to patients with different inflow tract sources. Conclusion: Careful attention should be paid to the LGV width when BRTO is performed for gastric varices.

Anatomical observation and clinical significance of the left gastric vein in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The left gastric vein (LGV) plays an important role in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (LRG). However, the anatomy of the LGV is complicated with significant variation, and it is often damaged and bleeding during LRG. The purpose of this study was to observe and analyze the anatomic types of the LGV in patients undergoing LRG and to explore its clinical significance. METHODS: A total of 217 patients who underwent LRG from June 2016 to December 2020 were included. LGVs were divided into four types according to the relationship between the LGV and peripheral arteries [celiac artery (CA)/common hepatic artery (CHA)/splenic artery (SA)] and the pancreas during LRG. If a LGV was damaged during surgery (resulting in bleeding), it was included in the bleeding group. Non-bleeding groups were included if there was no impairment to the LGV. RESULTS: A total of four types of LGVs were observed, of which type I was the most prevalent, accounting for 58.8% (n=121). In 21 patients (9.7%), the LGV was injured and hemorrhagic during LRG; and the type IV LGV injury bleeding rate was as high as 41.7% (5/12). Univariate analysis revealed that the extent of lymph node dissection (LND), pathological stage, tumor (T) stage, and type of LGV were significantly associated with LGV injury and hemorrhage (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that enlarged LND, late T stage, late pathological stage, and type IV LGV were independent risk factors for LGV injury hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: LGVs that run between the CHA (posterior) and the CA into the portal venous system were the most common anatomical type. A LGV that runs between the SA (posterior) and the CA into the portal venous system is easily injured (resulting in bleeding). LGV injury and hemorrhage are affected by a variety of factors, and therefore, careful intraoperative dissection is necessary to avoid damage to the LGV.

Color Doppler Ultrasound in Portal Hypertension: A Closer Look at Left Gastric Vein Hemodynamics.

Portal hypertension is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients. A color Doppler evaluation of the left gastric vein (LGV) has proven utility in the prediction of esophageal varices and variceal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension. The purpose of this review is to discuss the ultrasound evaluation, imaging findings, and clinical application of Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of the LGV. Knowledge of the color Doppler technique and imaging findings of the LGV may help clinicians improve the monitoring of portal hypertension and predict patients with a high risk of esophageal varices.

Gastric Emphysema and Hepatic Portal Vein Gas as Complications of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation.

Gastric emphysema (GE) in association with hepatic portal vein gas (HPVG) is a rare, benign medical condition that is very seldom caused by noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). This report describes a patient who developed GE along with gastric vein gas and HPVG, most likely due to multiple episodes of vomiting in combination of using bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), a form of NIPPV. The patient responded to conservative treatment with intravenous fluids, pantoprazole, and the urgent cessation of BiPAP and oral intake.

Can the Computed Tomographic Aspect of Porto-Systemic Circulation in Cirrhotic Patients be Associated with the Presence of Variceal Hemorrhage?

Background and objectives: Variceal bleeding is a serious complication caused by portal hypertension, frequently encountered among cirrhotic patients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the aspect of the collateral, porto-systemic circulation, as detected by CT are associated with the presence variceal hemorrhage (VH). Materials and Methods: 81 cirrhotic patients who underwent a contrast-enhanced CT examination were retrospectively included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: Cirrhotic patients with variceal hemorrhage during the hospital admission concomitant, with the CT examination (n = 33) and group 2-cirrhotic patients, without any variceal hemorrhage in their medical history (n = 48). The diameter of the left gastric vein, the presence or absence and dimensions of oesophageal and gastric varices, paraumbilical veins and splenorenal shunts were the indicators assessed on CT. Results: The univariate analysis showed a significant association between the presence of upper GI bleeding and the diameters of paraoesophageal veins, paragastric veins and left gastric vein respectively, all of these CT parameters being higher in patients with variceal bleeding. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the diameter of the left gastric vein was independently associated with the presence of variceal hemorrhage (OR = 1.6 (95% CI: 1.17-2.19), p = 0.003). We found an optimal cut-off value of 3 mm for the diameter of the left gastric vein useful to discriminate among patients with variceal hemorrhage from the ones without it, with a good diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.78, Se = 97%, Sp = 45.8%, PPV = 55.2%, NPV = 95.7%).Conclusions: Our observations point out that an objective CT quantification of porto-systemic circulation can be correlated with the presence of variceal hemorrhage and the diameter of the left gastric vein can be a reliable parameter associated with this condition.

Incidence and hemodynamic feature of risky esophageal varices with lower hepatic venous pressure gradient.

Background: To examine the incidence of cirrhosis patients with high-risk esophageal varices (EV) who show hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) < 10 mmHg and to identify their hemodynamic features. Methods: This prospective study consisted of 110 cirrhosis patients with EV, all with the candidate for primary or secondary prophylaxis. Sixty-one patients had red sign, and 49 patients were bleeders. All patients underwent both Doppler ultrasound and HVPG measurement. Results: There were 18 patients (16.4%) with HVPG < 10 mmHg. The presence of venous-venous communication (VVC) was more frequent in patients with HVPG < 10 mmHg (10/18) than in those with HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg (19/92; p = 0.0021). The flow volume in the left gastric vein (LGV) and the incidence of red sign were higher in the former (251.9 ± 150.6 mL/min; 16/18) than in the latter (181 ± 100.5 mL/min, p = 0.02; 45/92; p = 0.0018). The patients with red sign had lower HVPG (13.3 ± 4.5) but advanced LGV hemodynamics (velocity 13.2 ± 3.8 cm/s; flow volume 217.5 ± 126.6 mL/min), whereas those without red sign had higher HVPG (16.2 ± 4.6, p = 0.001) but poorer LGV hemodynamics (10.9 ± 2.3, p = 0.002; 160.1 ± 83.1, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Patients with high-risk EV with HVPG < 10 mmHg showed 16.4% incidence. Although low HVPG may be underestimated by the presence of VVC, the increased LGV hemodynamics compensates for the severity of portal hypertension, which may contribute to the development of red sign.

Aberrant left gastric vein is associated with hepatic artery variations.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the imaging findings and hepatic artery variations encountered in patients with aberrant left gastric vein (ALGV). METHODS: A retrospective database search between January 2014 and November 2018 was carried for ALGV. The course and types (1-3) of ALGV, the presence of associated liver lesions, and coexistence of hepatic artery variations were reviewed on CT images. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (22 men, 68.7%) with a mean age of 52.5 years (range 22-76 years) were found to have ALGV. The prevalence of ALGV was 0.073%. The most frequent type of ALGV was type 1 (n = 22, 68.7%), followed by type 3 (n = 7, 21.8%) and type 2 (n = 3, 9.3%). We noticed mild-to-severe parenchymal hyperdensity at the posterior aspect of segments II and III in patients with type 1 (n = 20/22) and type 2 (n = 2/3) ALGV consistent with fat sparing due to third inflow effect. Two out of seven patients with type 3 ALGV had main portal vein thrombosis; however, the presence of ALGV maintained left portal vein flow in these patients. Twelve (37.5%) patients had accompanying hepatic artery variation. Left hepatic and right hepatic artery variations were detected in 8 (25%) and 2 (6.25%) of the patients, respectively. In 2 patients, Michels type IV variation was detected. CONCLUSION: Aberrant left gastric vein is associated with hepatic artery variations, which can be important for preoperative and pretransplant planning.

Anatomic variations in the left gastric vein and their clinical significance during laparoscopic gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons normally encounter the left gastric vein (LGV) during laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer, and the various anatomic variants of this vessel make the procedure difficult. The objective of this study was to classify anatomic variants of the LGV in the laparoscopic operation field and clarify their clinical significance during LG. METHODS: In total, 405 patients who underwent LG in 2013-2017 for gastric cancer were enrolled in the study. LGV drainage was classified into six types by the anatomic relation of the LGV to the arteries of the celiac axis: Type Ia [LGV runs anteriorly to the common hepatic artery (CHA)], Type Ip (LGV runs posteriorly to CHA), Type II (LGV runs anteriorly to the left gastric artery), Type IIIa [LGV runs anteriorly to the splenic artery (SA)], Type IIIp (LGV runs posteriorly to SA), and Type IV (LGV runs cranially into the proximal portal vein or liver parenchyma). If the LGV was injured during the operation, the patient was included as a member of the injury group (IG). RESULTS: Most patients (n = 391, 96.5%) had a single LGV, whereas 14 (3.5%) patients had double LGVs. Type Ip was the most common of the six drainage types (n = 195, 48.1%). The number of patients in the IG was 49 (13.0%). Types I and III were relatively easily injured when compared with type II (p = 0.025). Patients in the IG had longer operation times, more blood loss, and more lymph node metastases than the non-IG patients. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients, the LGV drains posteriorly to the CHA or anteriorly to the LGA. Gastric surgeons should take great care not to injure the LGV during LG when it is not present on the anterior side of the celiac axis.

Computed Tomography-Based Diagnosis of Gastric Vein Invasion in Patients with Gastric Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate computed tomography (CT)-based diagnosis of venous invasion in patients with gastric cancer and its prognostic value. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records and CT examinations of 530 patients with gastric cancer diagnosed after biopsy from February 2003 to December 2015 were included in this retrospective study. An imaging-based diagnosis of venous invasion was established when one of the following criteria were satisfied: 1) tumoral enhancement in the lumen of the vein, 2) tumor protruding through the course of a vein, and 3) distention of the vein due to extension of the gastric tumor. CT-based diagnosis of gastric vein invasion was established in 11/530 patients. RESULTS: Histopathological examination revealed poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma (n=10) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (n=1). The median survival of the patients after the initial CT was 153.5 (range: 6-1275) days. Tumor invasion was observed at the aberrant left gastric vein (n=2), right gastroepiploic and superior mesenteric vein (n=2), gastric vein (n=4), and short gastric vein (n=3). Two of the three patients with short gastric vein invasion died 6 and 7 days after the initial CT, respectively. CONCLUSION: All draining veins of the stomach can be invaded by gastric cancer; CT can enable diagnosis that may be important for prognosis and surgical planning. The presence of short gastric vein invasion detected by CT may be associated with poor prognosis.

Left Gastric Vein Visualization with Hepatopetal Flow Information in Healthy Subjects Using Non-Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Balanced Steady-State Free-Precession Sequence and Time-Spatial Labeling Inversion Pulse.

Objective: To selectively visualize the left gastric vein (LGV) with hepatopetal flow information by non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography under a hypothesis that change in the LGV flow direction can predict the development of esophageal varices; and to optimize the acquisition protocol in healthy subjects. Materials and Methods: Respiratory-gated three-dimensional balanced steady-state free-precession scans were conducted on 31 healthy subjects using two methods (A and B) for visualizing the LGV with hepatopetal flow. In method A, two time-spatial labeling inversion pulses (Time-SLIP) were placed on the whole abdomen and the area from the gastric fornix to the upper body, excluding the LGV area. In method B, nonselective inversion recovery pulse was used and one Time-SLIP was placed on the esophagogastric junction. The detectability and consistency of LGV were evaluated using the two methods and ultrasonography (US). Results: Left gastric veins by method A, B, and US were detected in 30 (97%), 24 (77%), and 23 (74%) subjects, respectively. LGV flow by US was hepatopetal in 22 subjects and stagnant in one subject. All hepatopetal LGVs by US coincided with the visualized vessels in both methods. One subject with non-visualized LGV in method A showed stagnant LGV by US. Conclusion: Hepatopetal LGV could be selectively visualized by method A in healthy subjects.

Left Gastric Vein Visualization with Hepatopetal Flow Information in Healthy Subjects Using Non-Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Balanced Steady-State Free-Precession Sequence and Time-Spatial Labeling Inversion Pulse

OBJECTIVE: To selectively visualize the left gastric vein (LGV) with hepatopetal flow information by non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography under a hypothesis that change in the LGV flow direction can predict the development of esophageal varices; and to optimize the acquisition protocol in healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Respiratory-gated three-dimensional balanced steady-state free-precession scans were conducted on 31 healthy subjects using two methods (A and B) for visualizing the LGV with hepatopetal flow. In method A, two time-spatial labeling inversion pulses (Time-SLIP) were placed on the whole abdomen and the area from the gastric fornix to the upper body, excluding the LGV area. In method B, nonselective inversion recovery pulse was used and one Time-SLIP was placed on the esophagogastric junction. The detectability and consistency of LGV were evaluated using the two methods and ultrasonography (US). RESULTS: Left gastric veins by method A, B, and US were detected in 30 (97%), 24 (77%), and 23 (74%) subjects, respectively. LGV flow by US was hepatopetal in 22 subjects and stagnant in one subject. All hepatopetal LGVs by US coincided with the visualized vessels in both methods. One subject with non-visualized LGV in method A showed stagnant LGV by US. CONCLUSION: Hepatopetal LGV could be selectively visualized by method A in healthy subjects.

CT imaging-based determination and classification of anatomic variations of left gastric vein.

BACKGROUND: Precise determination and classification of left gastric vein (LGV) anatomy are helpful in planning for gastric surgery, in particular, for resection of gastric cancer. However, the anatomy of LGV is highly variable. A systematic classification of its variations is still to be proposed. We aimed to investigate the anatomical variations in LGV using CT imaging and develop a new nomenclature system. METHOD: We reviewed CT images and tracked the course of LGV in 825 adults. The frequencies of common and variable LGV anatomical courses were recorded. Anatomic variations of LGV were proposed and classified into different types mainly based on its courses. The inflow sites of LGV into the portal system were also considered if common hepatic artery (CHA) or splenic artery (SA) could not be used as a frame of reference due to variations. RESULTS: Detailed anatomy and courses of LGV were depicted on CT images. Using CHA and SA as the frames of reference, the routes of LGV were divided into six types (i.e., PreS, RetroS, Mid, PreCH, RetroCH, and Supra). The inflow sites were classified into four types (i.e., PV, SV, PSV, and LPV). The new classification was mainly based on the courses of LGV, which was validated with MDCT in the 805 cases with an identifiable LGV, namely type I, RetroCH, 49.8 % (401/805); type II, PreS, 20.6 % (166/805); type III, Mid, 20.0 % (161/805); type IV, RetroS, 7.3 % (59/805); type V, Supra, 1.5 % (12/805); and type VI, PreCH, 0.7 % (6/805). Type VII, designated to the cases in which SA and CHA could not be used as frames of reference, was not observed in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed depiction of the anatomy and courses of LGV on CT images allowed us to evaluate and develop a new classification and nomenclature system for the anatomical variations of LGV.

Effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt combined with left gastric vein embolization on the liver function of patients with liver cirrhosis / 中华消化杂志

Objective To compare the difference in the effects on liver function between transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) alone and the combination of TIPS and left gastric vein embolization (LGVE) in patients with liver cirrhosis.Methods This research was a retrospective study.From September 2014 to September 2015,31 patients with liver cirrhosis underwent TIPS (TIPS group) and 29 patients with liver cirrhosis underwent TIPS combined with LGVE (TIPS+LGVE group) were enrolled.The data of the liver function of patients before and after operation were collected and the Child-Pugh score and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) were also calculated.Student's t test and chi-squared test were performed for statistical analysis.Results The preoperative portal vein pressures of TIPS group and TIPS+LGVE group were (28.48±2.77) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) and (28.38± 2.92) mmHg,respectively.And after operation,the portal vein pressures decreased to (17.81 ± 1.47) mmHg and (17.97 ± 2.04) mmHg,respectively,and the differences were both statistically significant (t=18.908 and 11.648,both P＜0.01).At 12 months after operation,Child-Pugh score of TIPS+ LGVE group was 5.69 ± 1.19,which was significantly lower than that before operation (7.03±1.76),and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.398,P=0.001),which was also lower than that of TIPS group at the same time point (6.52 ± 1.54),and the difference was statistically significant (t =2.303,P=0.025).At 12 months after operation,the component ratio of patients with Child-Pugh grade A of TIPS±LGVE group was 89.7％ (26/29),which was higher than that before operation (44.8％,13/29),and the difference was statistically significant (x2=13.228,P＜0.01).The component ratio of patients with Child-Pugh grade B was 6.9 ％ (2/29),which was lower than that before operation (41.4 ％,12/29),and the difference was statistically significant (x2 =9.416,P＜ 0.01).Conclusions TIPS significantly reduces portal vein pressure in patients with liver cirrhosis and it does not deteriorate liver function of patients in the long term.The combination of TIPS and LGVE is better than TIPS alone in improving liver function in patients with liver cirrhosis,especially in improvig long-term liver function in patients of Child-Pugh A and B grade.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of vascular arrangement including the hepatic artery and left gastric vein during gastric surgery.

BACKGROUND: During gastric surgery, precise recognition of the anatomical variations and relationships among gastric tumors and vessels, including the hepatic artery (HA) and left gastric vein (LGV), is required. We utilized a three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed image as a preoperative simulation for gastric surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 84 patients who underwent gastrectomy at Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital. This cohort was sequentially divided into a without-3D group (n = 42) and with-3D group (n = 42), and the perioperative outcomes were compared. The 3D image could be used to classify the HA or LGV arrangement pattern. RESULTS: Regarding the HA arrangement, the right HA of 1 patient (2.3 %) was arising from the superior mesenteric artery, the left HA of 8 patients (19 %) was arising from the left gastric artery, 29 patients (69 %) presented a normal rearrangement, and 4 patients (9.5 %) exhibited other arrangements. The analysis of the LGV arrangement revealed that the LGV in 15 patients (36 %) was located on the dorsal side of the common HA, the LGV in 5 patients (12 %) was located on the ventral side of the common HA, the LGV in 12 patients (29 %) was found on the ventral side of the splenic artery, the LGV in 6 patients (14 %) was located on the dorsal side of the splenic artery, and 4 patients (9.5 %) presented other arrangements. The intraoperative blood loss in the without-3D and with-3D groups was 276 ± 430 and 157 ± 170 g, respectively (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: The 3D reconstruction technique was useful for understanding and sharing anatomic information during gastric surgery.

Evaluation of left gastric vein in Chinese healthy adults with multi-detector computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the classification and diameter of left gastric vein (LGV) in healthy Chinese adults with multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). METHODS: MDCT angiography was performed in 234 healthy adults for the portal venous system. CT cross-sectional thin-layer reconstruction combined with maximum intensity projection, volume rendering and multiplanar reconstruction were applied. The diameter of LGV was measured at the point within 2 cm from LGV origination. RESULTS: Of 234 subjects, 11 subjects (4.70%) who did not have clear images were excluded, and 223 subjects (95.30%) with excellent images were included. The LGV was originated from the portal vein in 46.15%, splenic vein in 30.77%, portal splenic angle in 14.53%, and the left branch of the portal vein in 3.85%. The maximal diameter of LGV was 4.74 ± 0.84 mm with a 95% confidence interval of 4.63-4.85 mm, and the LGV diameter was positively correlated with the weight of patients (R = 0.26, P = 0.006). No significant difference existed in the maximal diameter of LGV at different origination sites (P = 0.35). The diameter of LGV was significantly greater in males than in females (4.90 ± 0.85 vs. 4.56 ± 0.80 mm, P = 0.002), and the maximal diameter of LGV was significantly (P = 0.02) greater in the age range of 30-39 and 40-49 years than in the range of >70 years. No statistical significance (P = 0.36) was detected in the other groups. CONCLUSION: MDCT can clearly display the detailed anatomy and variation of LGV in healthy adults, providing a normal range of LGV diameter for clinical reference for diagnosing possible portal hypertension and for possible intervention.

Classification of portal vein tributaries in Thai cadavers including a new type V.

PURPOSE: To compare portal vein tributaries in Thai with Thompson classification. METHODS: In 211 Thai cadavers, abdominal regions were dissected to identify the portal veins and their tributaries. The subjects were classified into types based on modes of drainage of the left gastric and inferior mesenteric veins. Percentages of all types of venous drainage were counted. RESULTS: There are four types of portal tributaries as defined by Thompson, type I_47.87 %, type II_13.27 %, type III_7.58 %, and type IV_29.86 %. There were 1.42 % of whose inferior mesenteric veins entered the joining angle of the superior mesenteric and splenic veins, and were classified as type V. The left gastric vein mostly drained into the portal vein in 79.15 %, while the inferior mesenteric vein emptied into the splenic vein mainly in 55.45 %. CONCLUSIONS: A new variance of portal tributaries in Thai cadavers is reported. The variations of portal vein formations are critical for liver surgery and interventional radiological procedures.

Strategic approach to concurrent aberrant left gastric vein and aberrant left hepatic artery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: A case report.

An aberrant left gastric vein (ALGV) directly entering the lateral segment of the liver is a rare variation in the portal vein system, whereas an aberrant left hepatic artery (ALHA) arising from the left gastric artery is observed relatively frequently. Here we report a case in which both ALGV and ALHA were encountered before laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with curative lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. We accurately diagnosed these vessel anomalies preoperatively on abdominal contrast-enhanced CT. During surgery, we divided the ALGV at the point of entry to the liver and preserved the ALHA by dividing the branches toward the stomach, in consideration of curability and safety. The postoperative course was uneventful overall, although temporary mild liver dysfunction was observed. This case highlights the importance of preoperative evaluation and preparation in a rare case of concurrent ALGV and ALHA.

Use of gastrojugular shunt as minimally invasive portal systemic shunt before liver transplantation / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Surgical shunt is still an effective method in managing portal hypertension related gastrointestinal bleeding.To minimize the invasive trauma and adverse effect on transplantation remains to be the unsolved problem.Herein we present the use of a newly designed surgical shunt to cure massive refractory gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage in a patient,who was critically ill because of the extensive thrombus in portal venous system.The procedure is named gastrojugular shunt.For the sake of its simple operation and effective outcome,the procedure was performed on four other patients.All the patients were well treated and recovered uneventfully with good follow up results.