Is single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) dependent on the location of the tumor?

BACKGROUND: We compared the surgical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). METHODS: We performed single-incision gastric wedge resection on prospectively-enrolled 15 consecutive patients with gastric GIST between November 2020 and April 2022 in a single tertiary center. The early perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared to those of patients who underwent CLS. The indications did not differ from those for conventional laparoscopic procedures for gastric GIST. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients were assigned to the SILS (n = 15) and CLS (n = 15) groups. There were no significant differences in the estimated blood loss and intraoperative blood transfusion between the SILS and CLS groups. There were no intraoperative complications or conversions to multiple-port or open surgery in the SILS group. Proximally located tumors were more commonly treated with CLS than with SILS (P = 0.045). GISTs located in the greater curvature were more commonly treated with SILS than with CLS, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.08). The mean incision length in the SILS group was 4.1 cm shorter than that in the CLS group (3.2 ± 0.7 and 7.3 ± 5.2 cm, respectively, P = 0.01). The postoperative analgesic dose was significantly lower in the SILS than in the CLS group (0.4 ± 1.4 and 2.1 ± 2.3, respectively P = 0.01). Also, the duration of postoperative use of analgesic was shorter in SILS than in CLS (0.4 ± 0.7 and 2.0 ± 1.8, respectively, P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the early postoperative complications between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: SILS is as safe, feasible, and effective for the treatment of gastric GIST as CLS with comparable postoperative complications, pain, and cosmesis. Moreover, SILS can be considered without being affected by the type or location of the tumor.

Laparoscopic gastric wedge resection and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy performed on a 6-cm gastric desmoid tumour with pancreatic invasion.

Desmoid tumours are rare tumours originating from fibroblasts, and are characterised by local infiltration and no metastasis. When complete resection is possible, surgical resection is considered a first-line treatment. In the case of large desmoid tumours, it is mainly performed by laparotomy, not laparoscopy. We report a case of a 43-year-old female patient presenting with a hypodense mass of approximately 5 cm in the posterior wall of the gastric antrum on computed tomography. There was no history of familial adenomatous polyposis, trauma or abdominal surgery. The patient underwent laparoscopic gastric wedge resection and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy without peri-operative complications. Pathological analysis revealed a desmoid tumour, which originated from the stomach and invaded the pancreas. Despite the large size and the locally infiltrative characteristics of these tumours, laparoscopic surgery can be an optimal treatment option due to its advantages.

Gastric perforation by intragastric balloon: Laparoscopic gastric wedge resection can be a strategy?

INTRODUCTION: IGB (Intragastric Balloon) is acknowledged to be a safe and secure device, whose outcomes in terms of weight loss are widely discussed. Bariatric community has soon noted tolerance and benefit of this tool, considered a first and easy step before bariatric surgery. Nevertheless, some authors have described a series of complications that, although rare, could be life threatening and hard to manage, as a gastric perforation. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We reported a case of a 55-year-old obese woman, undergone placement of IGB device heisting in a gastric perforation. In the same day of surgery, we performed an emergency, applying a combined endoscopic and laparoscopic approach, to remove the balloon and to close perforation by a gastric resection. DISCUSSION: Short term outcome was satisfactory, and the patient had a successful further follow up and weight loss. CONCLUSION: IGB is a valuable tool among bariatric procedure, nevertheless the surgeon has to consider the possible and life-threatening complications and to provide a multidisciplinary equip to face this occurrence.

Laparoscopic treatment of large gastrointestinal stromal tumors (> 5 cm).

INTRODUCTION: Although laparoscopic techniques are currently a recognized type of treatment of small stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach, their application in the case of larger tumors has been the subject of debate. AIM: To evaluate the technical feasibility, safety and early results of the laparoscopic treatment of large GISTs with a diameter of more than 5 cm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using data on patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for gastric GIST in the period from 2009 to 2016. The patients selected for the study were divided into two groups based on the diameter of the tumor: patients who developed a tumor with a diameter smaller than or equal to 5 cm (group 1), and those whose tumors exceeded 5 cm in diameter (group 2). The following factors were established and compared for the two groups: duration of surgery, amount of intra-operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and the number and nature of post-operative complications. RESULTS: No deaths occurred in the 30-day post-operative period, and no statistically significant differences regarding complications in the post-operative period were observed. In group 2, statistically significantly more pronounced blood loss and longer hospital length of stay were observed. No difference in the duration of surgery between the investigated groups was observed. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that the surgical treatment of GISTs with a diameter of more than 5 cm by means of minimally invasive procedures is a viable and safe alternative.

Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: clinical features and short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection.

INTRODUCTION: Although minimally invasive techniques are currently recognized as effective and validated treatment for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), the role of laparoscopy is not yet established, especially in the institutions that have less experience in minimally invasive surgery. AIM: To evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors compared to the results obtained in a group of patients treated with conventional surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data collected for a group of 68 patients treated for gastric GIST in the period from 2002 to 2017 was performed. Forty-six patients were treated laparoscopically (group 1) and 22 patients underwent conventional surgery (group 2). The analyzed medical data included clinical and pathomorphological features of removed tumors, perioperative parameters as well as short and long-term results of surgical treatment. RESULTS: Histopathological examination confirmed radical resection for all patients. No deaths were reported in the 30-day post-operative period. Patients in group 1 had significantly shorter length of hospital stay (3 vs. 9 days), less intra-operative blood loss (25 vs. 175 ml) and fewer perioperative complications (13% vs. 41%) compared to group 2. The mean post-operative follow-up was 57 months. During this period, four patients died for reasons unrelated to the primary disease. None of the patients who underwent a laparoscopic procedure had a recurrence of the tumor in the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy in the treatment of gastric GISTs has unquestionable advantages, including decreased blood loss, reduced risk of complications, and shorter hospital stay.

Gastric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor treated with combined laparoscopic and endoscopic gastric wedge resection: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor is an uncommon soft tissue neoplasm rarely reported in the stomach. CASE PRESENTATION: We identified a tumor highly suggestive of poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma in the lesser curvature of the stomach of a 53-year-old female during screening endoscopy. Although the patient's gastric biopsy did not reveal cancer, the tumor configuration was strongly suspicious for malignancy, and we performed a gastric wedge resection using a combined laparoscopic and endoscopic method. The lesion was diagnosed as inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor based on its morphological and immunohistological features. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis of soft tissue tumors in the stomach. We present a case of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor safely treated with combined laparoscopic and endoscopic gastric wedge resection.

Higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease after gastric wedge resections of gastric submucosal tumors located close to the gastroesophageal junction.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) would be more prevalent after a gastric wedge resection of a submucosal tumor (SMT) located close to the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) than after a gastric wedge resection of an SMT at other locations because of the damage to the lower esophageal sphincter during surgery. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with gastric SMT who underwent open or laparoscopic gastric wedge resection between January 2000 and August 2012 at the Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital were enrolled into this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the location of the tumor, upper or lateral border of the tumor within 5 cm of the GEJ (GEJ ≤ 5 cm group) and upper or lateral border of the tumor greater than 5 cm distal to the GEJ (GEJ > 5 cm group). The surgical records, clinicopathologic findings, postoperative GERD symptoms, postoperative use of acid suppressive medications and preoperative and postoperative endoscopic findings were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in the frequency of the preoperative GERD symptoms between the 2 groups, whereas postoperative GERD symptoms and postoperative use of acid suppressive medications were more frequent in the GEJ ≤ 5 cm group (P = 0.045 and P = 0.031). However, there were no differences in the follow-up endoscopic findings in terms of reflux esophagitis and Hill's grade between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The incidence of GERD was higher after gastric wedge resection of SMTs located close to the GEJ. Hence, adequate care should be taken during the follow-up of these patients.

Higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease after gastric wedge resections of gastric submucosal tumors located close to the gastroesophageal junction

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) would be more prevalent after a gastric wedge resection of a submucosal tumor (SMT) located close to the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) than after a gastric wedge resection of an SMT at other locations because of the damage to the lower esophageal sphincter during surgery. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with gastric SMT who underwent open or laparoscopic gastric wedge resection between January 2000 and August 2012 at the Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital were enrolled into this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the location of the tumor, upper or lateral border of the tumor within 5 cm of the GEJ (GEJ 5 cm group). The surgical records, clinicopathologic findings, postoperative GERD symptoms, postoperative use of acid suppressive medications and preoperative and postoperative endoscopic findings were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in the frequency of the preoperative GERD symptoms between the 2 groups, whereas postoperative GERD symptoms and postoperative use of acid suppressive medications were more frequent in the GEJ < or = 5 cm group (P = 0.045 and P = 0.031). However, there were no differences in the follow-up endoscopic findings in terms of reflux esophagitis and Hill's grade between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The incidence of GERD was higher after gastric wedge resection of SMTs located close to the GEJ. Hence, adequate care should be taken during the follow-up of these patients.