RESUMO
Peripheral dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT) is a rare and non-aggressive benign odontogenic tumor. They usually affect the elderly and are predominantly located in the anterior region of the jaws. Their differential diagnosis includes reactive/inflammatory gingival lesions. We report here two cases of peripheral DGCT in a 73-year-old female and a 48-year-old male patient and review the cases published in the literature. Both lesions presented as a nodular lesion in the mandible, and panoramic radiography showed no abnormalities. Microscopically, it was observed to be an ameloblastomatous epithelial proliferation associated with clusters of ghost cells and dysplastic dentin. Immunohistochemistry revealed positivity for cytokeratin 19 and a low Ki-67 proliferative index. Based on histopathological features and the absence of radiographic findings, a diagnosis of peripheral DGCT was rendered. The low number of cases published of peripheral DGCT makes case reports important in providing information that helps in their diagnoses and management.
Assuntos
Ameloblastoma , Tumores Odontogênicos , Idoso , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tumores Odontogênicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Tumores Odontogênicos/cirurgia , Radiografia PanorâmicaRESUMO
Calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC) is a rare odontogenic cyst with ameloblastic epithelial lining containing clusters of ghost cells. COCs have been described in association with several odontogenic tumors, more commonly odontomas and rarely with dentigerous cyst (DC). In this article, we describe a case of COC associated with DC in a 15-year-old girl, who presented with a swelling on the right middle third of the face, producing facial asymmetry. Panoramic radiography showed a well-circumscribed, corticated, and unilocular radiolucency at the level of the right maxillary sinus, involving 2 unerupted premolars. The lesion was enucleated and histologically revealed a COC associated with DC, which presented mucous metaplasia. Immunohistochemical reactions were performed to better illustrate this rare synchronous occurrence of COC and DC, showing positivity for CK5, CK14, CK19, and p63 in both lesions. CK18 was negative in COC, and Bcl-2 was negative in DC. Periodic acid Schiff highlighted the mucous cells in the DC lining.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Cisto Dentígero/complicações , Neoplasias Maxilares/patologia , Cisto Odontogênico Calcificante/patologia , Adolescente , Cisto Dentígero/diagnóstico por imagem , Cisto Dentígero/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Maxila/diagnóstico por imagem , Maxila/patologia , Maxila/cirurgia , Neoplasias Maxilares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Maxilares/etiologia , Neoplasias Maxilares/cirurgia , Cisto Odontogênico Calcificante/diagnóstico , Cisto Odontogênico Calcificante/etiologia , Cisto Odontogênico Calcificante/cirurgia , Radiografia Panorâmica , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pilomatrixoma, craniopharyngioma, and calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor are the main entities presenting ghost cells as an important histological feature, in spite their quite different clinical presentation; it seems that they share a common pathway in the formation of these cells. The aim of this study is to examine and compare the characteristics of ghost and other cells that form these lesions. METHODS: Forty-three cases including 21 pilomatrixomas, 14 craniopharyngiomas, and eight calcifying cystic odontogenic tumors were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for cytokeratins, CD138, ß-catenin, D2-40, Glut-1, FAS, CD10 and also by scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The CKs, CD138, ß-catenin, Glut-1, FAS, and CD10 were more often expressed by transitional cells of craniopharyngioma and calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor, compared with pilomatrixoma. Basaloid cells of pilomatrixoma showed strong positivity for CD138 and CD10. Differences on expression pattern were identified in transitional and basal cells, as ghost cells were negative for most antibodies used, except by low expression for cytokeratins. By scanning electron microscopy, the morphology of ghost cells were similar in their fibrillar cytoplasm, but their pattern varied from sheets in pilomatrixoma to small clusters in craniopharyngioma and calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanisms involved in formation of ghost cells are unknown, but probably they follow different pathways as protein expression in the basal/transitional cells was not uniform in the three tumors studied.