Preoperative hormone stimulation; does it increase hypospadias postoperative complications?

AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess the effect of Preoperative Hormone Stimulation (PHS) on glans size in proximal hypospadias with chordee and small glans, and to determine if PHS is associated with increased postoperative complications. PATIENTS & METHODS: Between 2014 and 2021, 101 cases of proximal hypospadias with small glans (12 mm or less) were operated upon in our hospital and are the basis of this cohort. All patients underwent a standard two-stage surgical repair, undergoing a correction of the chordee in the first operation and urethroplasty in the second operation. All patients included were operated by the same surgeon. They were classified into two groups; Group A: 50 children were operated upon between 2014 and 2017 and did not receive PHS and Group B: 51 children operated between 2018 and 2021 and received PHS. Glans dimensions including Dorsal Longitudinal Length (DLL) and Glans Width (GW) were measured during the first operation. PHS was given 1-2 months before the second operation in Group B. The glans dimensions were measured again during the second operation after PHS. Follow up period ranged from 2 to 9 years (mean 5 years). RESULTS: Following PHS a statistically significant increase in glans length (p = 0.042) and glans width (p = 0.011) was observed at the second operation, with 36 patients (70%) showing a mean glans width increase of 2.78 mm (range 2-8 mm) after receiving PHS. There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rates between the two groups (p = 0.556) with a fragility index of zero (FI = 0). DISCUSSION: The present study separates itself from most other studies in the literature, in the fact that it has included only a specific group of proximal and perineal hypospadias with severe chordee and glans width of 12 mm or less and that glans dimensions were always objectively and accurately measured under general anesthesia. The other major difference is that PHS in our study was given after and not before the first operation. Furthermore, the fact that all patients prior to 2018 did not receive PHS and all patients after 2018 received PHS, indicates that there was no selection bias. CONCLUSION: This study shows that PHS results in an increase the size of the glans in 70% of patients with hypospadias and a small glans without an increase in postoperative complications.

Pediatric Penile and Glans Anthropometry Nomograms: An Aid in Hypospadias Management.

OBJECTIVE: To establish pediatric penile and glans anthropometry nomograms. This may be used as a reference model for penile assessment while managing hypospadias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2012 and September 2013, 263 boys of varying ages (0-16 years) were included in the study. Those with genetic, endocrine disorders, having genital anomaly, undescended testis, neonates, and infants with a nonretractile prepuce, with multiple congenital anomalies and refusal to take part in the study were excluded. Evaluated outcome variables were stretched penile length, glans circumference (GC) at coronal sulcus, glans diameter at coronal sulcus (Gdcl), mid glans diameter, and ventral glans length. Glans ratios were generated by dividing Gdcl by GC. Data were expressed as mean, median, and standard deviation. Correlation between age and variables was evaluated using nonparametric Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The patients were divided in six age groups, namely 0-1 (n = 61), 1-3 (n = 37), 3-5 (n = 36), 5-7 (n = 36), 7-12 (n = 45), and >12 years (n = 48). Gdcl was the maximum transverse glans diameter and based on it small glans size varied widely from 8.9 to 35.04 mm for various age groups. Although glans anthropometry showed age-related changes, glans ratio remained relatively constant between 0.49 and 0.53 (mean: 0.5 ± 0.051, r = 0.29). All the variables except glans ratio showed a significant positive correlation with age (r = 0.954-0.98, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Penile anthropometry nomograms provide a reference model for hypospadias. This may aid in (a) objective preoperative assessment of glans size (b) patient selection for preoperative hormonal stimulation (c) provides a yardstick for postoperative cosmesis.

Is glans penis width a risk factor for complications after hypospadias repair?

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have suggested that a smaller glans penis size may be associated with a higher likelihood of complications after hypospadias repair. Accurate identification of risk factors other than the well-understood variable of meatal location would allow development of better prognostic models and individualized risk stratification. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a smaller width of the glans penis predicts adverse outcomes after hypospadias surgery. METHODS: Prospectively recorded clinical data were reviewed from a single-institution registry of primary hypospadias repairs performed between 2011 and 2014. Follow-up records were examined for occurrence of complications. Urethroplasty complications were defined to include meatal stenosis, dehiscence, urethrocutaneous fistula, urethral stricture, and/or urethral diverticulum. The subset of meatal stenosis and dehiscence were regarded as glanular complications. Regression analyses were performed to determine association between glans width and occurrence of complications. Because pre-operative androgen stimulation is known to increase glans penis size, separate subgroup analyses were included of patients with and without pre-operative use of testosterone cream. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients met criteria for inclusion in the study cohort: 140 patients underwent a single-stage repair, while 19 patients had a two-stage repair. The median glans penis width was 15 mm (range 10-22). Eighty-four patients (53%) received testosterone cream pre-operatively and had a significantly wider glans penis than the 75 patients who did not (median 15.5 vs 14 mm; P < 0.001). Median clinical follow-up was 7 months (IQR 1-12), with a minimum time elapsed since surgery of 10 months at the time of chart review. Twenty-four patients (15%) had one or more urethroplasty complications, including 11 (7%) with glanular complications. Overall, there was no statistically significant association between glans width and urethroplasty complications (P = 0.26) or glanular complications (P = 0.90) (Summary Table). Subgroup analyses of patients with and without pre-operative testosterone also revealed no significant associations between glans width and complications. CONCLUSIONS: Glans penis width was not a risk factor for complications after hypospadias repair. This finding differs from the results of other recent studies and encourages further research into the value of measuring penile parameters in patients undergoing hypospadias repair.

Glans size is an independent risk factor for urethroplasty complications after hypospadias repair.

INTRODUCTION: We hypothesized small glans size could increase urethroplasty complications (UC) following hypospadias repair. To test this, we measured glans width at its widest point in consecutive patients with hypospadias, and following a protocol for surgical decision-making, we then assessed post-operative UC using pre-determined definitions. We now report analysis of glans size as a potential additional independent risk factor for UC after hypospadias repair. METHODS: Consecutive prepubertal patients undergoing hypospadias repair (2009-2013) had maximum glans width measured using calipers (Fig. 1). There were no differences in surgical technique for urethroplasty or glansplasty in this series based on the measured size of the glans. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed UC (fistula, glans dehiscence, diverticulum, stricture and/or meatal stenosis) based on glans size while adjusting for patient age, meatus (distal or midshaft/proximal), type of repair (TIP, inlay, 2-stage), surgeon, and primary or reoperative repair. Glans size was analyzed as both a continuous and dichotomous variable, with small glans defined as <14 mm. RESULTS: Mean glans size was 15 mm (10-27 mm) in 490 boys (mean 1.5 years) undergoing 432 primary repairs (380d/19mid/33prox), and 58 reoperations (28d/7mid/23prox). Increasing age between 3 months and 10 years did not correlate with increasing glans size (R = 0.01, p = 0.18). 17% had small glans <14 mm. UC occurred in 61 (13%) primary TIP, 2-stage, and reoperative repairs, including 20/81 (25%) patients with small glans <14 mm, versus 41/409 (10%) in patients with glans width ≥14 mm (p = 0.0003). On multivariate analysis, small glans size (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8-6.8), reoperations (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.5) and mid/proximal meatus (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.6-6.2) were independent risk factors for UC. Surgeon, repair type, and patient age did not impact risk for UC. Analysis with glans size as a continuous variable demonstrated each 1 mm increase in size decreased odds of UC (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of prospectively-collected data from a standardized management protocol in 490 consecutive boys undergoing hypospadias repair adds small glans size, defined as width <14 mm, to proximal meatal location and reoperation as an independent risk factor for UC. Best means to modify this factor remain to be determined. Our data suggest that others analyzing potential risks for hypospadias UC should similarly measure and report glans width.

The Clitoral Size of the Korean Female Newborn / 영남의대학술지

BACKGROUND: To determine mean clitoral and glans size of Korean female newborn. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The size of glans and clitoris of 68 Korean female newborns born at Yeungnam University Medical Center were measured from May in 1999 to August in 1999. RESULTS: The mean size of the 68 newborns were 2.38+/-1.14 mm in glans length, 2.55+/-1.48 mm in glans width and 4.66+/-1.93 mm in clitoral length. In the premature infants the mean clitoral size was 1.92+/-1.58 mm in glans length, 1.78+/-1.24 mm in glans width and 3.86+/-2.16 mm in clitoral length. In the full term infants 2.53+/-1.12 mm in glans length, 2.75+/-1.58 mm in glans width and 4.94+/-1.89 mm in clitoral length. In low birth weight infants clitoral size was measured 1.55+/-1.10 mm in glans length, 2.04+/-2.03 mm in glans width and 3.29+/-1.87 mm in clitoral length. In normal birth weight infants 2.53+/-1.13 mm in glans length, 2.68+/-1.48 mm in glans width and 4.92+/-1.91 mm in clitoral length. In high birth weight infants 1.54+/-0.50 mm in glans length, 1.63+/-0.53 mm in glans width and 3.18+/-1.04 mm in clitoral length. CONCLUSION: There was no significant correlation between gestational age and clitoral size or glans size, but significant negative correlation was found between birth weight and clitoral size or glans size.