Exploring the gap in the Occupational Safety And Health Administration (OSHA) laboratory standard: a literature review and recommendations to enhance histology laboratory safety practices.

This article discusses current available resources with respect to regulatory agencies including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for determining the requirements placed upon laboratories for handling of hazardous materials. The focus is specific to the histology laboratory and xylene use, and includes a literature review, admixed with historical reference points. Procedures and tasks in the histology laboratory are highlighted in relation to their connection to the quality of the work environment with an emphasis on air quality. Recommendations are provided for maintaining an appropriate work environment for the prevention of potential adverse health effects. The gap within the OSHA Laboratory Standard, i.e. a lack of explanatory language, leaves much open to interpretation regarding fume hood usage with volatile hazardous chemicals. As a result, both the level of safety training and the awareness of good laboratory practices (GLP) for handling volatile hazardous reagents such as xylene can become compromised.

Opinion on Maintaining In-House GLP Status for Toxicologic Pathology in Pharmaceutical and (Agro)Chemical Development.

Many pharmaceutical companies have recently elected to stop maintaining good laboratory practices (GLP) status of their R&D sites. Similar discussions have also been engaged in the (agro)chemical industry. This opinion paper examines the pros and cons of maintaining facility GLP status for the purposes of performing the pathology interpretation or peer reviews of GLP studies internally. The toxicologic pathologist provides gross and histomorphologic evaluation and interpretation of nonclinical exploratory and regulatory studies during drug and (agro)chemical development. This assessment significantly contributes to human risk assessment by characterizing the toxicological profile and discussing the human relevance of the findings. The toxicologic pathologist is a key contributor to compound development decisions (advancement or termination) and in the development of de-risking strategies for backup compounds, thus playing a critical role in helping to reduce the late attrition of drugs and chemicals. Maintaining GLP compliance is often perceived as a costly and cumbersome process; a common and short-term strategy to reduce the costs is to outsource regulatory toxicity studies. However, there are significant advantages in maintaining the GLP status for toxicologic pathology activities in-house including the sustainable retention of internal pathology expertise that has maintained the necessary training needed to manage GLP studies. [Box: see text].

Non-clinical safety assessment and in vivo biodistribution of CoviFab, an RBD-specific F(ab')2 fragment derived from equine polyclonal antibodies.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has required the urgent development of new therapies, among which passive immunotherapy is contemplated. CoviFab (INM005) is a RBD-specific F(ab')2 fragment derived from equine polyclonal antibodies. We investigate their preclinical security and biodistribution by in vivo and ex vivo NIR imaging after intravenous administration of a dose of 4 mg/kg at time 0 and 48 h. Images were taken at 1, 12, 24, 36, 48, 49, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132 and 144 h after the first intravenous injection. At 96 and 144 h, mice were sacrificed for haematology, serum chemistry, clinical pathology, histopathology and ex vivo imaging. The biodistribution profile was similar in all organs studied, with the highest fluorescence at 1 h after each injection, gradually decreasing after that each one and until the end of the study (144 h). The toxicology study revealed no significant changes in the haematology and serum chemistry parameters. Further, there were no changes in the gross and histological examination of organs. Nonclinical data of the current study confirm that CoviFab is safe, without observable adverse effects in mice. Furthermore, we confirm that bioimaging studies are a useful approach in preclinical trials to determine biodistribution.

Desarrollo y validación de técnicas analíticas para la determinación de biomarcadores sanguíneos en ensayos preclínicos. ¿Por qué y para qué? / Development and validation of analytical techniques for the determination of blood biomarkers in preclinical trials. Why and what for?

Resumen El descubrimiento de un nuevo principio activo farmacéutico implica estudios preclínicos, que tienen como objetivo demostrar que es eficaz y seguro para un posterior ensayo en seres humanos. Esto conduce a la necesidad de desarrollar tecnologías que aprovechen las nuevas herramientas analíticas disponi bles dentro de un contexto donde los resultados de las pruebas realizadas, estén plenamente documentados, bajo sistemas de buenas prácticas de laboratorio auditables. En esta revisión se actualizan y describen algunos de los ensayos realizados en la etapa preclínica del desarrollo de un nuevo fármaco y el estado actual de la tecnología analítica empleada para el dosaje de diferentes biomarcadores sanguíneos de interés. Se analizaron los biomarcadores más relevantes, las normativas de validación de las técnicas analíticas empleadas para su determinación y los problemas que se presentan al tratar de aplicarlas.

Abstract New drug discovery involves preclinical studies to demonstrate its effectivity and safety for further tests in humans. This leads to the need to develop technologies that take advantage of the new analytical tools available within a context where the results of the tests carried out are fully documented, under auditable systems of good laboratory practice. This review updates and describes some of the tests carried out in the preclinical stage of the development of a new drug and the current state of the analytical technology used to measure different blood biomarkers of interest. Biomarker parameters were analyzed at the physiological level, considering both the validation regulations of the analytical techniques used for their determination as the problems that arise when trying to apply them, since many of these biomarkers are endogenous compounds in the used matrices.

Managing COVID-19 Lockdown Impacts: Sustaining GLP Compliance and Man Material Medium (MMM) Strategy for Augmenting Prevention of Workplace Infections.

Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) is a well-established global system that encompass a set of principles or a framework for defining how laboratory studies are planned, performed, monitored, recorded, reported, and stored for future reference. It is important that compliance with the principles of GLP continues to be maintained. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic lockdowns in various countries, including India, have been sudden and over an extended duration. Although every GLP laboratory has Standard Operating Procedure for disaster management, the sudden lockdown due to COVID-19 created specific emergency procedures related to this situation such as travel bans, safe distancing, and work from home notifications. Good Laboratory Practice compliances in the context of animal experimentation during and post lockdown period need effective managerial responses that are not just flexible and innovative but can ensure they are well-calibrated to the challenges of business continuity and maintenance of health directives. On-the-ground realities suggest there may still be practical challenges to compliance, and guidelines may not always be complied with. This article discusses the issues that may be encountered due to COVID-19 that could potentially impact the GLP status of a study and suggests ways to manage them so as to minimize or prevent infection with COVID-19. We propose an MMM (Man, Material, and Medium) strategy to ensure compliance with health directives and guidelines that will help staff to keep themselves and others safe in the workplace while endeavoring to comply with GLP requirements.

[Development and validation of analytical techniques for the determination of blood biomarkers in preclinical trials. Why and what for?] / Desarrollo y validación de técnicas analíticas para la determinación de biomarcadores sanguíneos en ensayos preclínicos. ¿Por qué y para qué?

New drug discovery involves preclinical studies to demonstrate its effectivity and safety for further tests in humans. This leads to the need to develop technologies that take advantage of the new analytical tools available within a context where the results of the tests carried out are fully documented, under auditable systems of good laboratory practice. This review updates and describes some of the tests carried out in the preclinical stage of the development of a new drug and the current state of the analytical technology used to measure different blood biomarkers of interest. Biomarker parameters were analyzed at the physiological level, considering both the validation regulations of the analytical techniques used for their determination as the problems that arise when trying to apply them, since many of these biomarkers are endogenous compounds in the used matrices.

El descubrimiento de un nuevo principio activo farmacéutico implica estudios preclínicos, que tienen como objetivo demostrar que es eficaz y seguro para un posterior ensayo en seres humanos. Esto conduce a la necesidad de desarrollar tecnologías que aprovechen las nuevas herramientas analíticas disponibles dentro de un contexto donde los resultados de las pruebas realizadas, estén plenamente documentados, bajo sistemas de buenas prácticas de laboratorio auditables. En esta revisión se actualizan y describen algunos de los ensayos realizados en la etapa preclínica del desarrollo de un nuevo fármaco y el estado actual de la tecnología analítica empleada para el dosaje de diferentes biomarcadores sanguíneos de interés. Se analizaron los biomarcadores más relevantes, las normativas de validación de las técnicas analíticas empleadas para su determinación y los problemas que se presentan al tratar de aplicarlas.

Sampling and Quality Assurance and Quality Control: A Guide for Scientists Investigating the Occurrence of Microplastics Across Matrices.

Plastic pollution is a defining environmental contaminant and is considered to be one of the greatest environmental threats of the Anthropocene, with its presence documented across aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. The majority of this plastic debris falls into the micro (1 µm-5 mm) or nano (1-1000 nm) size range and comes from primary and secondary sources. Its small size makes it cumbersome to isolate and analyze reproducibly, and its ubiquitous distribution creates numerous challenges when controlling for background contamination across matrices (e.g., sediment, tissue, water, air). Although research on microplastics represents a relatively nascent subfield, burgeoning interest in questions surrounding the fate and effects of these debris items creates a pressing need for harmonized sampling protocols and quality control approaches. For results across laboratories to be reproducible and comparable, it is imperative that guidelines based on vetted protocols be readily available to research groups, many of which are either new to plastics research or, as with any new subfield, have arrived at current approaches through a process of trial-and-error rather than in consultation with the greater scientific community. The goals of this manuscript are to (i) outline the steps necessary to conduct general as well as matrix-specific quality assurance and quality control based on sample type and associated constraints, (ii) briefly review current findings across matrices, and (iii) provide guidance for the design of sampling regimes. Specific attention is paid to the source of microplastic pollution as well as the pathway by which contamination occurs, with details provided regarding each step in the process from generating appropriate questions to sampling design and collection.

Recommendations for ecotoxicity testing with stygobiotic species in the framework of groundwater environmental risk assessment.

As a consequence of the growing global dependence on groundwater resources, environmental risk assessments (ERA) for groundwater are increasingly required and, with that, ecotoxicological studies with groundwater fauna (stygofauna). However, the literature on the ecotoxicological studies with stygobiotic species (i.e. species that complete their life cycle exclusively in groundwater) has not expanded significantly since the first paper published in this field. The limitations regarding the use of stygobiotic species for ecotoxicological testing are clear and consistent across the globe; stygobiotic species are often 1) naturally present in low numbers, 2) difficult to collect, and 3) difficult to culture under laboratory conditions. This paper reviews the methods used in ecotoxicological studies performed with stygobiotic species, and provides ten recommendations for Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) for such tests. The recommendations focused on the following 10 points: 1) the taxonomic identification, the life stage/size and gender of the test organisms; 2) collection methodology of the organisms, including collection location, conditions and methods; 3) holding and acclimation conditions in the laboratory; 4) exposure conditions such as test set up and exposure time, number of replicates and densities of organisms in tests and in test vessels; 5) range-finding test set up and schedule; 6) final test design, including details of controls and treatments, and replication options; 7) incubation conditions, specifying temperature, pH and oxygenation levels throughout the test; 8) test duration; 9) observations and endpoints; 10) test validity criteria and compliance. The recommendations were developed for the purpose of supporting future short-term ecotoxicological testing with stygofauna through providing consistency in the protocols. A discussion of the potential implications for groundwater managers and decision-makers committed to ERA for groundwater is included.

Toxicity and pharmacokinetic profile of SGM-101, a fluorescent anti-CEA chimeric antibody for fluorescence imaging of tumors in patients.

The real-time improvement of the intraoperative discrimination between different tissue types (particularly between tumor and adjacent normal tissue) using intraoperative imaging represents a considerable advance for oncology surgeons. However, the development of imaging agents is much slower than that of drug therapies, although surgery represents one of the few curative treatments for many solid tumors. SGM-101 is a recently described, innovative antibody conjugate in which the near-infrared fluorochrome BM-104 is covalently linked to a chimeric monoclonal antibody against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). SGM-101 was developed with the goal of providing oncology surgeons with an intraoperative imaging tool that allows the visualization of CEA-overexpressing tumors. This antigen is overexpressed in a wide range of human carcinomas, such as colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, non-small cell lung and breast carcinomas. Here we characterized SGM-101 safety prior to its clinical testing for real-time cancer mapping by oncology surgeons. Safety pharmacology and toxicology studies were performed after intravenous injection of SGM-101 in Wistar rats and in Beagle dogs. SGM-101 metabolism and pharmacokinetics were analyzed in rats and mice. Finally, the potential toxicity of the BM-104 dye and SGM-101 cross-reactivity were assessed in a panel of 42 human tissues. Our pre-clinical toxicology, pharmacology and pharmacokinetic results demonstrated the absence of significant adverse effects of both SGM-101 and BM-104 at doses well above the anticipated maximal human exposure. Taken together, the results of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetic and toxicology studies support the development of SGM-101 as a potentially useful and safe tumor-specific imaging tool that might improve the complete tumor resection rate.

Construction and Validation of Quantification Methods for Determining the Cannabidiol Content in Liquid Pharma-Grade Formulations by Means of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Partial Least Squares Regression.

There is an increasing interest in cannabinoids as they are being proved to effectively treat the symptoms of a variety of medical conditions. Commercialization of cannabinoid-based pharmaceutical products is expected to grow in the near future, favored by the recent changes in medical regulations in many developed countries. Hence, robust and reliable analytical methods for determining the content of the active pharmaceutical ingredient will be needed, as this is one of the most relevant parameters for the decision to release the final pharmaceutical product into the market. The aim of this work was to demonstrate that near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy fulfills the needed requirements for this purpose, as well as to provide a methodology to be applied to other cannabinoid-based products. We present two validated methods for the quantification of different liquid pharma-grade cannabidiol (CBD) formulations based on NIR spectroscopy and partial least squares regression modelling. The methods were constructed and validated with spectra belonging both to production samples and to laboratory samples specifically made for this purpose, and they fulfill European Medicines Agency and International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guideline requirements. These methods allow determining the CBD content with results comparable to the usual method of choice while saving reagent- as well as time-related costs.

A Binding Potency Assay for Pritumumab and Ecto-Domain Vimentin.

Pritumumab, a natural human IgG1kappa mAb, was isolated from the regional lymph node of a patient with cervical cancer. This antibody has been reported to bind the cytoskeletal protein vimentin, and to cell surface expressed vimentin referred to as ecto-domain vimentin (EDV). Here, we report details of the development of a potency of binding assay for pritumumab as a prerequisite before pursuing clinical trials. The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect antibody-binding antigen can serve as a potency assay for release of manufactured samples to be used in clinical studies. Several layers of controls for this assay along with suitability testing for reagents and components of the assay must be developed before the assay can be incorporated for stability testing and release of manufatured samples.

Toxicological evaluation of the flavour ingredient N-(1-((4-amino-2,2-dioxido-1H-benzo[c][1,2,6]thiadiazin-5-yl)oxy)-2-methylpropan-2-yl)-2,6-dimethylisonicotinamide (S2218).

A toxicological evaluation of N-(1-((4-amino-2,2-dioxido-1H-benzo[c][1,2,6]thiadiazin-5-yl)oxy)-2-methylpropan-2-yl)-2,6-dimethylisonicotinamide (S2218; CAS 1622458-34-7), a flavour with modifying properties, was completed for the purpose of assessing its safety for use in food and beverage applications. S2218 exhibited minimal oxidative metabolism in vitro, and in rat pharmacokinetic studies, the compound was poorly orally bioavailable and rapidly eliminated. S2218 was not found to be mutagenic in an in vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay, and was found to be neither clastogenic nor aneugenic in an in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus assay. In subchronic oral toxicity studies in male and female rats, the NOAEL was 140 mg/kg bw/day (highest dose tested) for S2218 sulfate salt (S8069) when administered as a food ad-mix for 13 consecutive weeks. Furthermore, S2218 sulfate salt demonstrated a lack of maternal toxicity, as well as adverse effects on fetal morphology at the highest dose tested, providing a NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/day for both maternal toxicity and embryo/fetal development when administered orally during gestation to pregnant rats.

Implementation of Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) in basic scientific research: Translating the concept beyond regulatory compliance.

The principles of Good Laboratory Practices (GLPs) are mainly intended for the laboratories performing studies for regulatory compliances. However, today GLP can be applied to broad disciplines of science to cater to the needs of the experimental objectives, generation of quality data and assay reproducibility. Considering its significance, it can now be applied in academics; industries as well as government set ups throughout the world. GLP is the best way to promote the reliability, reproducibility of the test data and hence facilitates the international acceptability. Now it is high time to translate and implement the concept of GLP beyond regulatory studies. Thus, it can pave the way for better understanding of scientific problems and help to maintain a good human and environmental health. Through this review, we have made an attempt to explore the uses of GLP principles in different fields of science and its acceptability as well as looking for its future perspectives.

Good cell culture practices &in vitro toxicology.

Good Cell Culture Practices (GCCP) is of high relevance to in vitro toxicology. The European Society of Toxicology In Vitro (ESTIV), the Center for Alternatives for Animal Testing (CAAT) and the In Vitro Toxicology Industrial Platform (IVTIP) joined forces to address by means of an ESTIV 2016 pre-congress session the different aspects and applications of GCCP. The covered aspects comprised the current status of the OECD guidance document on Good In Vitro Method Practices, the importance of quality assurance for new technological advances in in vitro toxicology including stem cells, and the optimized implementation of Good Manufacturing Practices and Good Laboratory Practices for regulatory testing purposes. General discussions raised the duality related to the difficulties in implementing GCCP in an academic innovative research framework on one hand, and on the other hand, the need for such GCCP principles in order to ensure reproducibility and robustness of in vitro test methods for toxicity testing. Indeed, if good cell culture principles are critical to take into consideration for all uses of in vitro test methods for toxicity testing, the level of application of such principles may depend on the stage of development of the test method as well as on the applications of the test methods, i.e., academic innovative research vs. regulatory standardized test method.

Management of laboratory animals of new drug safety evaluation in GLP and AAALACi certification systems / 药物评价研究

With the global development of the research of medicine,more and more new drug safety evaluation institutions have been certified by Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) and Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALACi).Laboratory animal,which is the carrier of drug safety evaluation,its survival condition and animal welfare will directly effect the experimental results.Dealing with laboratory animal husbandry by scientific methods in two systems is the requirement to make sure the accuracy of experimental data of animal experiments.With the certification processes and practical experiences in two certification systems of Tianjin Institute of Pharmaceutical Research New Drug Evaluation Co.,Ltd.,also accompanied by experience exchangement with peers,the relationship of practices in two certification systems will be preliminarily discussed;Through strengthening the management of laboratory animal,it can help the institutions get the certificates.

Bioanalytical method transfer considerations of chromatographic-based assays.

Bioanalysis is an important part of the modern drug development process. The business practice of outsourcing and transferring bioanalytical methods from laboratory to laboratory has increasingly become a crucial strategy for successful and efficient delivery of therapies to the market. This chapter discusses important considerations when transferring various types of chromatographic-based assays in today's pharmaceutical research and development environment.

Toxicological evaluation of two novel bitter modifying flavour compounds: 3-(1-((3,5-dimethylisoxazol-4-yl)methyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1-(3-hydroxybenzyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione and 3-(1-((3,5-dimethylisoxazol-4-yl)methyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1-(3-hydroxybenzyl)-5,5-dimethylimidazolidine-2,4-dione.

A toxicological evaluation of two novel bitter modifying flavour compounds, 3-(1-((3,5-dimethylisoxazol-4-yl)methyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1-(3-hydroxybenzyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione (S6821, CAS 1119831-25-2) and 3-(1-((3,5-dimethylisoxazol-4-yl)methyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1-(3-hydroxybenzyl)-5,5-dimethylimidazolidine-2,4-dione (S7958, CAS 1217341-48-4), were completed for the purpose of assessing their safety for use in food and beverage applications. S6821 undergoes oxidative metabolism in vitro, and in rat pharmacokinetic studies both S6821 and S7958 are rapidly converted to the corresponding O-sulfate and O-glucuronide conjugates. S6821 was not found to be mutagenic or clastogenic in vitro, and did not induce micronuclei in bone marrow polychromatic erythrocytes in vivo. S7958, a close structural analog of S6821, was also found to be non-mutagenic in vitro. In short term and subchronic oral toxicity studies in rats, the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) for both S7958 and S6821 was 100 mg/kg bw/day (highest dose tested) when administered as a food ad-mix for either 28 or 90 consecutive days, respectively. Furthermore, S6821 demonstrated a lack of maternal toxicity, as well as adverse effects on fetal morphology at the highest dose tested, providing a NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/day for both maternal toxicity and embryo/fetal development when administered orally during gestation to pregnant rats.

Toxicological evaluation of a novel umami flavour compound: 2-(((3-(2,3-Dimethoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)thio)methyl)pyridine.

A toxicological evaluation of a umami flavour compound, 2-(((3-(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)thio)methyl)pyridine (S3643; CAS 902136-79-2), was completed for the purpose of assessing its safety for use in food and beverage applications. S3643 undergoes extensive oxidative metabolism in vitro with rat microsomes producing the S3643-sulfoxide and 4'-hydroxy-S3643 as the major metabolites. In incubations with human microsomes, the O-demethyl-S3643 and S3643-sulfoxide were produced as the major metabolites. In pharmacokinetic studies in rats, the S3643-sulfoxide represents the dominant biotransformation product. S3643 was not found to be mutagenic or clastogenic in vitro, and did not induce micronuclei in CHO-WBL cells. In subchronic oral toxicity studies in rats, the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) for S3643 was 100 mg/kg bw/day (highest dose tested) when administered in the diet for 90 consecutive days.

Toxicological evaluation and metabolism of two N-alkyl benzamide umami flavour compounds: N-(heptan-4-yl)benzo[d][1,3]dioxole-5-carboxamide and (R)-N-(1-methoxy-4-methylpentan-2-yl)-3,4-dimethylbenzamide.

Toxicological evaluations of two N-alkyl benzamide umami flavour compounds, N-(heptan-4-yl)benzo[d][1,3]dioxole-5-carboxamide (S807, CAS 745047-51-2) and (R)-N-(1-methoxy-4-methylpentan-2-yl)-3,4-dimethylbenzamide (S9229, CAS 851669-60-8), were completed for the purpose of assessing their safety for use in food and beverage applications. Both S807 and S9229 undergo rapid oxidative metabolism by both rat and human liver microsomes in vitro. In pharmacokinetic studies in rats, the systemic exposure to S9229 on oral administration is very low at all doses (% F < 1%), while that of S807 demonstrated a non-linear dose dependence. In metabolism studies in rats, hydroxylation of the C-4 aryl methyl group was found to be the dominant metabolic pathway for S9229. The dominant metabolic pathway for S807 in the rat involved oxidative scission of the methylenedioxy moiety to produce the corresponding 3,4-dihydroxybenamide which is further converted by Phase II metabolic enzymes to the 3- and 4-O-methyl ethers as well as their corresponding glucuronides. Both S807 and S9229 were not found to be mutagenic or clastogenic in vitro, and did not induce micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes in vivo. In a subchronic oral toxicity study in rats, the no-observed-effect-level (NOEL) for S807 was 20 mg/kg bw/day when administered in the diet for 13 weeks. The no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) for S9229 in rats was 100 mg/kg bw/day (highest dose tested) when administered in the diet for 28 consecutive days.

Quality compliance in the shift from cell transplantation to cell therapy in non-pharma environments.

Along with academic and charitable organizations, transfusion centers have ventured into the stem cell field, with the aim of testing of novel cell-based therapeutics in a clinical setting for future marketing approval. The fact that quality management structures, which are required for compliance with good scientific practice regulations, were originally designed for product development in corporate environments represents a major challenge for many developers. In this Commentary, challenges that non-pharmaceutical institutions must overcome to translate cell-based products into clinical therapies will be discussed from a quality standpoint. Furthermore, our development experience for a mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapy will be shared as a case study.