Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System.

Brain PET imaging often faces challenges from head motion (HM), which can introduce artifacts and reduce image resolution, crucial in clinical settings for accurate treatment planning, diagnosis, and monitoring. United Imaging Healthcare has developed NeuroFocus, an HM correction (HMC) algorithm for the uMI Panorama PET/CT system, using a data-driven, statistics-based approach. The HMC algorithm automatically detects HM using a centroid-of-distribution technique, requiring no parameter adjustments. This study aimed to validate NeuroFocus and assess the prevalence of HM in clinical short-duration 18F-FDG scans. Methods: The study involved 317 patients undergoing brain PET scans, divided into 2 groups: 15 for HMC validation and 302 for evaluation. Validation involved patients undergoing 2 consecutive 3-min single-bed-position brain 18F-FDG scans-one with instructions to remain still and another with instructions to move substantially. The evaluation examined 302 clinical single-bed-position brain scans for patients with various neurologic diagnoses. Motion was categorized as small or large on the basis of a 5% SUV change in the frontal lobe after HMC. Percentage differences in SUVmean were reported across 11 brain regions. Results: The validation group displayed a large negative difference (-10.1%), with variation of 5.2% between no-HM and HM scans. After HMC, this difference decreased dramatically (-0.8%), with less variation (3.2%), indicating effective HMC application. In the evaluation group, 38 of 302 patients experienced large HM, showing a 10.9% ± 8.9% SUV increase after HMC, whereas most exhibited minimal uptake changes (0.1% ± 1.3%). The HMC algorithm not only enhanced the image resolution and contrast but also aided in disease identification and reduced the need for repeat scans, potentially optimizing clinical workflows. Conclusion: The study confirmed the effectiveness of NeuroFocus in managing HM in short clinical 18F-FDG studies on the uMI Panorama PET/CT system. It found that approximately 12% of scans required HMC, establishing HMC as a reliable tool for clinical brain 18F-FDG studies.

Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks Aided Motion Correction of Dynamic 18F-FDG PET Brain Studies.

This work set out to develop a motion-correction approach aided by conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) methodology that allows reliable, data-driven determination of involuntary subject motion during dynamic 18F-FDG brain studies. Methods: Ten healthy volunteers (5 men/5 women; mean age ± SD, 27 ± 7 y; weight, 70 ± 10 kg) underwent a test-retest 18F-FDG PET/MRI examination of the brain (n = 20). The imaging protocol consisted of a 60-min PET list-mode acquisition contemporaneously acquired with MRI, including MR navigators and a 3-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography sequence. Arterial blood samples were collected as a reference standard representing the arterial input function (AIF). Training of the cGAN was performed using 70% of the total datasets (n = 16, randomly chosen), which was corrected for motion using MR navigators. The resulting cGAN mappings (between individual frames and the reference frame [55-60 min after injection]) were then applied to the test dataset (remaining 30%, n = 6), producing artificially generated low-noise images from early high-noise PET frames. These low-noise images were then coregistered to the reference frame, yielding 3-dimensional motion vectors. Performance of cGAN-aided motion correction was assessed by comparing the image-derived input function (IDIF) extracted from a cGAN-aided motion-corrected dynamic sequence with the AIF based on the areas under the curves (AUCs). Moreover, clinical relevance was assessed through direct comparison of the average cerebral metabolic rates of glucose (CMRGlc) values in gray matter calculated using the AIF and the IDIF. Results: The absolute percentage difference between AUCs derived using the motion-corrected IDIF and the AIF was (1.2% + 0.9%). The gray matter CMRGlc values determined using these 2 input functions differed by less than 5% (2.4% + 1.7%). Conclusion: A fully automated data-driven motion-compensation approach was established and tested for 18F-FDG PET brain imaging. cGAN-aided motion correction enables the translation of noninvasive clinical absolute quantification from PET/MR to PET/CT by allowing the accurate determination of motion vectors from the PET data itself.

Evaluating the Influence of Spatial Resampling for Motion Correction in Resting-State Functional MRI.

Head motion is one of major concerns in current resting-state functional MRI studies. Image realignment including motion estimation and spatial resampling is often applied to achieve rigid-body motion correction. While the accurate estimation of motion parameters has been addressed in most studies, spatial resampling could also produce spurious variance, and lead to unexpected errors on the amplitude of BOLD signal. In this study, two simulation experiments were designed to characterize these variance related with spatial resampling. The fluctuation amplitude of spurious variance was first investigated using a set of simulated images with estimated motion parameters from a real dataset, and regions more likely to be affected by spatial resampling were found around the peripheral regions of the cortex. The other simulation was designed with three typical types of motion parameters to represent different extents of motion. It was found that areas with significant correlation between spurious variance and head motion scattered all over the brain and varied greatly from one motion type to another. In the last part of this study, four popular motion regression approaches were applied respectively and their performance in reducing spurious variance was compared. Among them, Friston 24 and Voxel-specific 12 model (Friston et al., 1996), were found to have the best outcomes. By separating related effects during fMRI analysis, this study provides a better understanding of the characteristics of spatial resampling and the interpretation of motion-BOLD relationship.

Retrospective head motion correction approaches for diffusion tensor imaging: Effects of preprocessing choices on biases and reproducibility of scalar diffusion metrics.

PURPOSE: To evaluate how retrospective head motion correction strategies affect the estimation of scalar metrics commonly used in clinical diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies along with their across-session reproducibility errors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD), axial diffusivity (AD) and their respective across-session reproducibility errors were measured on a 4T test-retest dataset of healthy participants using five processing pipelines. These differed in: 1) the number of b0 volumes used for motion correction reference (one or five); 2) the estimations of the gradient matrix rotation (based on 6 or 12 degrees of freedom derived from coregistration); and 3) the software packages used (FSL or DTIPrep). Biases and reproducibility were evaluated in three regions of interest (ROIs) (bilateral arcuate fasciculi, cingula, and the corpus callosum) and also at the full brain level with tract based skeleton images. RESULTS: Preprocessing choices affected DTI measures and their reproducibility. The DTIPrep pipeline exhibited higher DTI metrics: FA/MD and AD (P < 0.05) relative to FSL pipelines both at the ROI and full brain level, and lower RD estimates (P < 0.05) at the ROI level. Within FSL pipelines no such effects were found (P-values ranging between 0.25 and 0.97). The DTIPrep pipeline showed the highest number of white matter skeleton voxels, with significantly higher reproducibility (P < 0.001) relative to the other pipelines (tested on P < 0.01 uncorrected maps). CONCLUSION: The use of an iteratively averaged b0 image as motion correction reference (as performed by DTIPrep) affects both scalar values and improves test-retest reliability relative to the other tested pipelines. These considerations are potentially relevant for data analysis in longitudinal DTI studies.

Effects of Motion Correction for Dynamic 11CRaclopride Brain PET Data on the Evaluation of Endogenous Dopamine Release in Striatum / 대한핵의학회잡지

PURPOSE: Neuroreceptor PET studies require 60-120 minutes to complete and head motion of the subject during the PET scan increases the uncertainty in measured activity. In this study, we investigated the effects of the data-driven head motion correction on the evaluation of endogenous dopamine release (DAR) in the striatum during the motor task which might have caused significant head motion artifact. MATERIALS AND METHODS: [11C]raclopride PET scans on 4 normal volunteers acquired with bolus plus constant infusion protocol were retrospectively analyzed. Following the 50 min resting period, the participants played a video game with a monetary reward for 40 min. Dynamic frames acquired during the equilibrium condition (pre-task: 30-50 min, task: 70-90 min, post-task: 110-120 min) were realigned to the first frame in pre-task condition. Intra-condition registrations between the frames were performed, and average image for each condition was created and registered to the pre-task image (inter-condition registration). Pre-task PET image was then co-registered to own MRI of each participant and transformation parameters were reapplied to the others. Volumes of interest (VOI) for dorsal putamen (PU) and caudate (CA), ventral striatum (VS), and cerebellum were defined on the MRI. Binding potential (BP) was measured and DAR was calculated as the percent change of BP during and after the task. SPM analyses on the BP parametric images were also performed to explore the regional difference in the effects of head motion on BP and DAR estimation. RESULTS: Changes in position and orientation of the striatum during the PET scans were observed before the head motion correction. BP values at pre-task condition were not changed significantly after the intra-condition registration. However, the BP values during and after the task and DAR were significantly changed after the correction. SPM analysis also showed that the extent and significance of the BP differences were significantly changed by the head motion correction and such changes were prominent in periphery of the striatum. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that misalignment of MRI-based VOI and the striatum in PET images and incorrect DAR estimation due to the head motion during the PET activation study were significant, but could be remedied by the data-driven head motion correction.