Healthcare utilization patterns of individuals with depression after national policy to increase the mental health workforce in primary care: a data linkage study.

BACKGROUND: The deployment of the mental health nurse, an additional healthcare provider for individuals in need of mental healthcare in Dutch general practices, was expected to substitute treatments from general practitioners and providers in basic and specialized mental healthcare (psychologists, psychotherapists, psychiatrists, etc.). The goal of this study was to investigate the extent to which the degree of mental health nurse deployment in general practices is associated with healthcare utilization patterns of individuals with depression. METHODS: We combined national health insurers' claims data with electronic health records from general practices. Healthcare utilization patterns of individuals with depression between 2014 and 2019 (N = 31,873) were analysed. The changes in the proportion of individuals treated after depression onset were assessed in association with the degree of mental health nurse deployment in general practices. RESULTS: The proportion of individuals with depression treated by the GP, in basic and specialized mental healthcare was lower in individuals in practices with high mental health nurse deployment. While the association between mental health nurse deployment and consultation in basic mental healthcare was smaller for individuals who depleted their deductibles, the association was still significant. Treatment volume of general practitioners was also lower in practices with higher levels of mental health nurse deployment. CONCLUSION: Individuals receiving care at a general practice with a higher degree of mental health nurse deployment have lower odds of being treated by mental healthcare providers in other healthcare settings. More research is needed to evaluate to what extent substitution of care from specialized mental healthcare towards general practices might be associated with waiting times for specialized mental healthcare.

Political Economy of Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) prevention and control in Lebanon: identifying challenges and opportunities for policy change and care provision reforms.

INTRODUCTION: Lebanon is a middle-income country facing substantial fragility features. Its health profile shows a high burden of NCD morbidity and mortality. This paper intends to analyse the political economy of NCD prevention and control in Lebanon. METHODS: This study adopted a literature-based case study research design using a problem-driven political economy analysis framework. A total of 94 peer-reviewed articles and documents from the grey literature published before June 2019 were retrieved and analysed. RESULTS: Lebanon's political instability and fragile governance negatively affect its capacity to adapt a Health-in-All-Policies approach to NCD prevention and enable the blocking of NCD prevention policies by opposed stakeholders. Recent economic crises limit the fiscal capacity to address health financing issues and resulting health inequities. NCD care provision is twisted by powerful stakeholders towards a hospital-centred model with a powerful private sector. Stakeholders like the MOPH, UN agencies, and NGOs have been pushing towards changing the existing care model towards a primary care model. An incremental reform has been adopted to strengthen a network of primary care centres, support them with health technologies and improve the quality of primary care services. Nevertheless, outpatient services that are covered by other public funds remain specialist-led without much institutional regulation. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed a locked equilibrium in NCD prevention policymaking in Lebanon, but with an incremental progress in service delivery reforms towards a primary care model. Advocacy and close monitoring by policy entrepreneurs (such as civil society) could initiate and sustain the implementation of policy change and care model reforms.

A dominance approach to analyze the incidence of catastrophic health expenditures in Iran.

Financial protection is a health system goal for all countries. Assessing progress on this relies on measuring the incidence of catastrophic health expenditures (proportion of the population whose out-of-pocket (OOP) payments for health surpass a certain threshold of household resources). Standard approaches rely on selective thresholds, however this masks varying intensities of financial hardship and poses a measurement challenge as incidence is sensitive to the choice of the threshold. We address this problem by applying the dominance approach, which tests differences in catastrophic incidence curves over a continuous range of thresholds. Iran is an interesting country for empirical application of the dominance approach given its historically high reliance on OOP payments to finance its health system and its commitment to improving financial protection through several national health policies over the last two decades. Using data from annual Household Income and Expenditure Surveys from 2005 to 2017 (sample size: 26,851-39,088 households), incidence was analyzed following this novel approach. Distribution of incidence across socio-economic status was also analyzed by estimating concentration indices and across health services or products by estimating average shares of each item. Results showed that over time catastrophic health expenditures increased for thresholds lower than 25% and decreased for thresholds higher than 35%. Catastrophic health expenditures were more equally distributed across income levels at lower thresholds, becoming concentrated amongst the rich as the threshold rose. Medicines represented the largest share of catastrophic spending for the poorest; medicines, dentistry, inpatient and ancillary services for the richest. This is the first study to apply dominance methods to analyze catastrophic health expenditures in a country over time. The analysis provides a nuanced picture of who incurs catastrophic health expenditures, to what extent hardship is experienced and what were the drivers of these expenditures - thus providing a better basis for policy responses.

Control rooms in publicly-funded health systems: Reviving value in healthcare governance.

BACKGROUND: As part of reforms in 2015, the Ministry of Health and Social Services in Quebec, Canada mandated the national implementation of control rooms, making health system actors accountable for implementing value-based performance management. OBJECTIVE: To explore how do organizational actors appropriate control rooms as managerial tools to influence value-based performance in health systems. DESIGN: Multi-site organizational ethnographic case studies (N = 2) and narrative process analysis of triangulated qualitative data collected through non-participatory observations (179.5 h), individual semi-structured interviews (N = 34), and document review (N = 143). RESULTS: The process of appropriating control rooms plays a crucial role in achieving value-based performance management. Appropriating unfolds along three paths (cognitive, structural, technical) over three phases (implementing, testing, adapting). Implementing control rooms both produces and emerges from improvement capacities within healthcare organizations. Testing tools reveals that incompatibilities between tools, structures and values give rise to value-driven distributed clinical leadership. Adapting tools relies on the adaptability of organizations towards the value system driving the tools, rather than on the adaptability of tools to organizational design. CONCLUSION: There is no "one-size-fits-all" framework to design and support the successful appropriation of control rooms towards achieving value-based performance. However, we believe that consideration for the three distinct phases of appropriation and leveraging the right mechanism to support each phase is a first important step in reviving value in healthcare governance.

Reorganising health and social care in Québec: a journey towards integrating care through mergers.

CONTEXT: Two reforms (2014, 2015) characterised by the merger of public health care establishments profoundly shaped the current organisation of Quebec's healthcare system. In 2015, 22 megastructures called Integrated Health and Social Services Centres/Integrated University Health and Social Services Centres (IHSSC/IUHSSC), were created and mandated to organise care delivery to their local populations. OBJECTIVE: To describe the service configuration of the 2015 healthcare system reforms, emphasising on how it shaped the organisation of primary health care (PHC) in Quebec. RESULTS: With the creation of IHSSCs/IUHSSCs, Quebec's healthcare system passed from three to two levels of governance, leading to a centralisation of decision-making powers. Most health services are delivered by the new organisations, while most PHC is delivered by semi-private medical practices, mainly Family Medicine Groups (FMGs). The FMG model is the preferred strategy to develop interdisciplinary team-work and inter-organizational collaborations with other PHC services. CONCLUSION: mechanisms through which centralised healthcare systems achieve community oriented integrated care (COIC) need to be properly understood in order to improve meaningful clinical outcomes. Mergers may not sufficiently achieve integration of services in all its dimensions. These reforms should be monitored and evaluated on their capacity to mobilise all providers as well as physicians to participate in COIC.

The application of triple aim framework in the context of primary healthcare: A systematic literature review.

The Triple Aim framework is an increasingly popular tool for designing and assessing quality improvements in the health care sector. We systematically reviewed the empirical evidence on the application of the Triple Aim framework within primary healthcare settings since its inception almost a decade ago. Results show that primary healthcare providers varied in their interpretation of the Triple Aim framework and generally struggled with a lack of guidance and an absence of composite sets of measures for performance assessment. Greater clarity around application of the Triple Aim framework in primary healthcare is needed, especially around the selection and implementation of purposeful measures from locally available data. This review highlights areas for improvement and makes recommendations intended to guide future applications of the Triple Aim in the context of primary healthcare.

Catastrophic Health Expenditure After the Implementation of Health Sector Evolution Plan: A Case Study in the West of Iran.

BACKGROUND: One of the main objectives of health systems is the financial protection against out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditures. OOP health expenditures can lead to catastrophic payments, impoverishment or poverty among households. In Iran, health sector evolution plan (HSEP) has been implemented since 2014 in order to achieve universal health coverage and reduce the OOP health expenditures as a percentage of total health expenditures. This study aimed to explore the percentage of households facing catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) after the implementation of HSEP and the factors that determine CHE. METHODS: A total of 663 households were selected through a cluster sampling based on the census framework of Sanandaj Health Center in July 2015. Data were gathered using face-to-face interviews based on the household section of the World Health Survey questionnaire. In this study, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition, if household health expenditures were equal to or more than 40% of the household capacity to pay, household was considered to be facing CHE. The determinants of CHE were analyzed using logistic regression model. RESULTS: The rates of households facing CHE were 4.8%. The key determinants of CHE were household economic status, presence of elderly or disabled members in the household and utilization of inpatient or rehabilitation services. CONCLUSION: The comparison of our findings and those of other studies carried out using a methodology comparable with ours in different parts of Iran before the implementation of HSEP suggests that the implementation of recent reforms has reduced CHE at the household level. Utilization of inpatient and rehabilitation services, the presence of elderly or disabled members in the household and the low economic status of the household would increase the likelihood of facing CHE. These variables should be considered by health policy-makers in order to review and revise content of recent reform, thus financially protecting public against CHE.

Europeanisation of health systems: a qualitative study of domestic actors in a small state.

BACKGROUND: Health systems are not considered to be significantly influenced by European Union (EU) policies given the subsidiarity principle. Yet, recent developments including the patients' rights and cross-border directive (2011/24 EU), as well as measures taken following the financial crisis, appear to be increasing the EU's influence on health systems. The aim of this study is to explore how health system Europeanisation is perceived by domestic stakeholders within a small state. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in the Maltese health system using 33 semi-structured interviews. Inductive analysis was carried out with codes and themes being generated from the data. RESULTS: EU membership brought significant public health reforms, transformation in the regulation of medicines and development of specialised training for doctors. Health services financing and delivery were primarily unaffected. Stakeholders positively perceived improvements to the policy-making process, networking opportunities and capacity building as important benefits. However, the administrative burden and the EU's tendency to adopt a 'one size fits all' approach posed considerable challenges. The lack of power and visibility for health policy at the EU level is a major disappointment. A strong desire exists for the EU to exercise a more effective role in ensuring access to affordable medicines and preventing non-communicable diseases. However, the EU's interference with core health system values is strongly resisted. CONCLUSIONS: Overall domestic stakeholders have a positive outlook regarding their health system Europeanisation experience. Whilst welcoming further policy developments at the EU level, they believe that improved consideration must be given to the specificities of small health systems.

Perspectives of biologists, epidemiologists and geneticists' controversies in sciences and health system reforms.

The global burden of diseases is predicted to increase considerably in the coming decades (GBD project, WHO, 2010 [1]) - WHO-World Bank study, 1991 [2]); for example, the World Alzheimer Report and the UN Declaration on Non-Communicable Diseases estimate that the burden associated with dementia will increase 2-fold by 2030 and 3-4-fold by 2050. Therefore, urgent needs must be met in order to help policy-makers deal with the increasing societal costs of diseases. Recent technologies can facilitate the detection and prevention of mild cases of cognitive impairments, or integrative genomic medicine can target more individualized genetic traits and pedigrees; however, scientists do not necessarily agree: results from a recent population-based study using population imaging [3] differed from results obtained using integrative genomics approaches [4], and controversy exists between molecular biologists [5,6] and geneticists [7,8] with respect to asthma genetics. These differences have led to different predictive disease models and can influence the assessment of aging and environmental modifiers. This paper highlights implications for the governance of health systems using current debates on the evolution of these major fields of science. In addition, this paper discusses the potential translation of these models for use in clinical practice, particularly with telemedicine and telecare dominated by new IT technologies and challenges of science in transition.

Financial Management Reforms in the Health Sector: A Comparative Study Between Cash-based and Accrual-based Accounting Systems.

BACKGROUND: Financial management and accounting reform in the public sectors was started in 2000. Moving from cash-based to accrual-based is considered as the key component of these reforms and adjustments in the public sector. Performing this reform in the health system is a part of a bigger reform under the new public management. OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to analyze the movement from cash-based to accrual-based accounting in the health sector in Iran. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This comparative study was conducted in 2013 to compare financial management and movement from cash-based to accrual-based accounting in health sector in the countries such as the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Iran. Library resources and reputable databases such as Medline, Elsevier, Index Copernicus, DOAJ, EBSCO-CINAHL and SID, and Iranmedex were searched. Fish cards were used to collect the data. Data were compared and analyzed using comparative tables. RESULTS: Developed countries have implemented accrual-based accounting and utilized the valid, reliable and practical information in accrual-based reporting in different areas such as price and tariffs setting, operational budgeting, public accounting, performance evaluation and comparison and evidence based decision making. In Iran, however, only a few public organizations such as the municipalities and the universities of medical sciences use accrual-based accounting, but despite what is required by law, the other public organizations do not use accrual-based accounting. CONCLUSIONS: There are advantages in applying accrual-based accounting in the public sector which certainly depends on how this system is implemented in the sector.