RESUMO
Objective To investigate the similarities and differences of 3 methods for detecting hepatitis B virus S 1(PreS1) ,and select the appropriate method for detecting clinical samples .Methods The PreS1 of the serum samples from chronic hepatitis B pa-tients were tested with enzyme immunoassay analyzer ,time-resolved method and the manual method .To compare the repetition rate ,select PreS1 antigen strongly positive serum and weak positive serum were detected 15 times by three methods ;To compare the explicit rate ,the reaction temperature was raised or lowered by 3 ℃ .Results The positive rate of three methods was 93 .53% , 92 .81% ,92 .81% .Automated ELISA reproducibility CV strong positive CV3 .62% ,weakly positive CV was 13 .42% ,CV of time-resolved method for the 2 kinds of samples were 5 .10% ,7 .92% ,manual methods CV 11 .10% 29 .88% ;changing the reaction incu-bation temperature 3 ℃ ,automatic detection ELISA all specimens S/CO value decreased ,increasing the chance of a false negative . The manual methods and time-resolved detection method for all specimens S/CO values increased ,increasing the chance of a false positive .Conclusion The detection rate and repeatability of automated ELISA were better .The time-resolved method followed and the manual methods were poor .
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE To investigate the correlations on hepatitis B virus(HBV)preS1-antigen(preS1-Ag)and HBV-DNA,HBV markers in patients with hepatitis B.METHODS The markers,preS1-Ag and HBV-DNA were determined by ELISA and PCR in 406 patients with hepatitis B and 80 healthy persons.RESULTS The positive rates of preS1-Ag in 160 patients with HBsAg(+)and HBeAg(+)were 84.4%.The positive rates of preS1-Ag in 246 patients with HBsAg(+)and HBeAg(-)were 42.3%;the difference between them was significant(?2=70.9,P
