Finite element analysis of hip fracture risk in elderly female: The effects of soft tissue shape, fall direction, and interventions.

This study investigates the effects of fall configurations on hip fracture risk with a focus on pelvic soft tissue shape. This was done by employing a whole-body finite element (FE) model. Soft tissue thickness around the pelvis was measured using a standing CT system, revealing a trend of increased trochanteric soft tissue thickness with higher BMI and younger age. In the lateroposterior region from the greater trochanter, the soft tissues of elderly females were thin with a concave shape. Based on the THUMS 5F model, an elderly female FE model with a low BMI was developed by morphing the soft tissue shape around the pelvis based on the CT data. FE simulation results indicated that the lateroposterior fall led to a higher femoral neck force for the elderly female model compared to the lateral fall. One reason may be related to the thin soft tissue of the pelvis in the lateroposterior region. Additionally, the effectiveness of interventions that can help mitigating hip fractures in lateroposterior falls on the thigh-hip and hip region was assessed using the elderly female model. The attenuation rate of the femoral neck force by the hip protector was close to zero in the thigh-hip fall and high in the hip fall, whereas the attenuation rate of the compliant floor was high in both falls. This study highlights age-related changes in the soft tissue shape of the pelvis in females, particularly in the lateroposterior regions, which may influence force mitigation for the hip joint during lateroposterior falls.

Minimizing the Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Hip Fracture Operation.

Introduction: Hip fractures are the most common serious injury in the elderly, associated with disability, morbidity, and mortality. Surgical site infection (SSI) is a serious post-operative complication. This prospective cohort study outlines how our center made cumulative improvements in SSI incidence rates, reaching a 12-month average of 0.5%. Methods: All patients undergoing hip fracture operation between 2016 and 2021 were included. The primary outcome measure was confirmed SSI, according to the Public Health England definition. Results were compared with the baseline recordings by an independent SSI team in 2013. Demographic data were compared with National Hip Fracture Database records. Peri-operative infection control and wound management tactics introduced between 2014 and 2021 were collated to gain an overview care bundle. Results: Baseline recordings identified a 9.0% SSI rate in a three-month observation period. In our study, 3,138 hip fracture operative cases were completed between October 2016 and December 2021. There were 9 superficial and 32 deep infections identified, yielding an overall infection rate of 1.3%. However, when analyzing the 12-month average, there was consistent decline in SSI from the baseline 9.0% in 2013 to 0.5% in 2021 (p < 0.05). A peri-operative care bundle included pre-operative bleeding risk assessment. Intra-operatively, double preparation and draping is used for arthroplasty. Broad-spectrum antibiotic agents and tranexamic acid are administered. Meticulous hemostasis and watertight wound closure are observed. Anti-coagulated patients received negative pressure dressings. Post-operatively, a dedicated senior lead team provided daily inpatient review of patients, with urgent consultant review of all wound healing concerns. Conclusion: Patients with a hip fracture have numerous risk factors for SSI. A dedicated multi-focal tactic, adopted by a multi-disciplinary department, can yield substantial risk reduction. Each intervention is evidence based and contributes to cumulative improvement. By prioritizing infection prevention, we have minimized the need for complex infection management interventions and achieved an annual saving of £860,000 for our trust.

Trends in hip fracture rates in spain from 2001 to 2018.

The present study includes the longest period of analysis with the highest number of hip fracture episodes (756,308) described in the literature for Spain. We found that the age-adjusted rates progressively decreased from 2005 to 2018. We believe that this is significant because it may mean that measures such as prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, or programs promoting healthy lifestyles, have had a positive impact on hip fracture rates. PURPOSE: To describe the evolution of cases and rates of hip fracture (HF) in patients 65 years or older in Spain from 2001 to 2018 and examine trends in adjusted rates. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study including patients ≥65 years with acute HF. Data from 2001 to 2018 were obtained from the Spanish National Record of the Minimum Basic Data Set of the Ministry of Health. We analysed cases of HF, crude incidence and age-adjusted rates by sex, length of hospital stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality, and used joinpoint regression analysis to explore temporal trends. RESULTS: We identified 756,308 HF cases. Mean age increased 2.5 years, LOS decreased 4.5 days and in-hospital mortality was 5.5-6.5%. Cases of HF increased by 49%. Crude rate per 100,000 was 533.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 532.1-534.5), increasing 14.0% (95%CI, 13.7-14.2). Age-adjusted HF incidence rate increased by 6.9% from 2001 (535.7; 95%CI, 529.9-541.5) to 2005 (572.4; 95%CI, 566.7-578.2), then decreased by 13.3% until 2017 (496.1, 95%CI, 491.7-500.6). Joinpoint regression analysis indicated a progressive increase in age-adjusted incidence rates of 1.9% per year from 2001 to 2005 and a progressive decrease of -1.1% per year from 2005 to 2018. A similar pattern was identified in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Crude incidence rates of HF in Spain in persons ≥65 years from 2001 to 2018 have gradually increased. Age-adjusted rates show a significant increase from 2001 to 2005 and a progressive decrease from 2005 to 2018.

Time to surgical treatment for hip fracture care.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated beneficial outcomes associated with timely surgical treatment of hip fracture. Subsequently, practice recommendations changed with 24-48 h as the recommended time for surgery from admission; however, recent data on timing of hip fracture surgery and how this impacts outcomes are lacking. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who had a primary diagnosis of hip fracture and underwent a subsequent surgical repair within 3 days of admission (Premier Healthcare claims 2006-2021 data). The primary exposure of interest was time from hip fracture diagnosis to surgery (categorized as 0-1 day, 2 days, and 3 days). Outcomes included any major complication, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Mixed-effects models measured the association between timing of surgery and outcomes. We report odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Among 501,267 surgical hip fracture patients, 26.0%, 56.0%, and 18.1% of patients received surgery on days 0-1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median ages were 83, 84, and 84 years old, and there were 73.3%, 72.2%, and 68.8% female in each group respectively. Compared with repair on day 0-1, hip fracture surgical treatment on day 2 or day 3 was associated with increased odds of major complications (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.08 and OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.13-1.2), mortality (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14 and OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.12-1.28), and ICU admission (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.09 and OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.32-1.4) after adjusting major comorbidities; all p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Despite the publication of society guidelines in 2015, most fracture patients still received surgery on day 2 or day 3 of admission and were associated with worse outcomes. Balancing optimization of clinical factors with timing of surgery can be challenging, and further research is needed. Nonetheless, our findings reiterate the importance of timely surgical intervention.

Validation of the Geriatrics at Risk Score (GeRi-Score) on 120-day follow-up, the influence of preoperative geriatric visits, and the time to surgery on the outcome of hip fracture patients: an analysis from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU).

A validation of the GeRi-Score on 120-day mortality, the impact of a pre-operative visit by a geriatrician, and timing of surgery on the outcome was conducted. The score has predictive value for 120-day mortality. No advantage was found for surgery within 24 h or a preoperative geriatric visit. PURPOSE: Numerous tools predict mortality among patients with hip fractures, but they include many variables, require time-consuming assessment, and are difficult to calculate. The GeRi-Score provides a quick method of pre-operative assessment. The aim of this study is to validate the score in the 120-day follow-up and determine the impact of a pre-operative visit by a geriatrician and timing of surgery on the patient outcome. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the AltersTraumaRegister DGU® from 2017 to 2021 was conducted, including all proximal femur fractures. The patients were divided into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups based on the GeRi-Score. Mortality was analyzed using logistic regression. To determine the influence of the time to surgery and the preoperative visit by a geriatrician, matching was performed using the exact GeRi-Score, preoperative walking ability, type of fracture, and the time to surgery. RESULTS: The study included 38,570 patients, divided into 12,673 low-risk, 18,338 moderate-risk, and 7,559 high-risk patients. The moderate-risk group had three times the mortality risk of the low-risk group (OR 3.19 (95% CI 2.68-3.79; p<0.001)), while the high-risk group had almost eight times the mortality risk than the low-risk group (OR 7.82 (95% CI 6.51-9.93; p<0.001)). No advantage was found for surgery within the first 24 h across all groups. There was a correlation of a preoperative geriatric visit and mortality showing an increase in the moderate and high-risk group on in-house mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The GeRi-Score has predictive value for 120-day mortality. No advantage was found for surgery within 24 h. The analysis did not demonstrate a benefit of the preoperative geriatric visit, but more data are needed.

A Comparison of Complication Rates between Early and Delayed Surgery among Filipino Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Hip.

Objectives: Existing standards of care recommend operative management for fragility fractures of the hip. Early intervention has been associated with lower incidence of morbidity and mortality. A lack of consensus remains in the Philippines however, regarding timing of surgery. We sought to determine the effects of surgical timing on in-hospital complications among Filipino patients with fragility hip fractures. Methods: All patients admitted for fragility hip fractures in a single tertiary-care facility from 2014-2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Subjects treated within 72 hours were grouped under "early intervention," while those managed beyond were designated "delayed intervention." Primary outcomes were complications during admission, while secondary outcome was length of hospital stay. A total of 96 patients met our inclusion criteria, of which 41 (42.71%) underwent early intervention. Baseline characteristics for both groups were comparable. Results: A significantly lower incidence of pressure ulcers (2.4% for ≤72hours vs 45.5%; p=<0.0001), pneumonia (7.32% vs 47.27%; p=<0.0001), and urinary tract infection (4.88% vs 40%; p=<0.0001), as well as shorter hospital stay (mean: 8.85 days±5.4 vs 14.6 days±13.3; p=0.01) were seen in the early intervention group. More cases of documented deep vein thrombosis were recorded in the delayed intervention group (83.3% versus 16.6%), as was the only case of in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: Early intervention showed a significantly lower incidence of in-hospital complications among patients with fragility fractures of the hip, suggesting that surgery within 72 hours may lead to better outcomes by helping to reduce the incidence of pressure sores, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection among Filipinos with hip fractures, while reducing length of admission.

Force magnitude and distribution during impacts to the hip are affected differentially by body size and body composition.

Hip fractures are a severe health concern among older adults. While anthropometric factors have been shown to influence hip fracture risk, the low fidelity of common body composition metrics (e.g. body mass index) reduces our ability to infer underlying mechanisms. While simulation approaches can be used to explore how body composition influences impact dynamics, there is value in experimental data with human volunteers to support the advancement of computational modeling efforts. Accordingly, the goal of this study was to use a novel combination of subject-specific clinical imaging and laboratory-based impact paradigms to assess potential relationships between high-fidelity body composition and impact dynamics metrics (including load magnitude and distribution and pelvis deflection) during sideways falls on the hip in human volunteers. Nineteen females (<35 years) participated. Body composition was assessed via DXA and ultrasound. Participants underwent low-energy (but clinically relevant) sideways falls on the hip during which impact kinetics (total peak force, contract area, peak pressure) and pelvis deformation were measured. Pearson correlations assessed potential relationships between body composition and impact characteristics. Peak force was more strongly correlated with total mass (r = 0.712) and lean mass indices (r = 0.510-0.713) than fat mass indices (r = 0.401-0.592). Peak deflection was positively correlated with indices of adiposity (all r > 0.7), but not of lean mass. Contact area and peak pressure were positively and negatively associated, respectively, with indices of adiposity (all r > 0.49). Trochanteric soft tissue thickness predicted 59 % of the variance in both variables, and was the single strongest correlate with peak pressure. In five-of-eight comparisons, hip-local (vs. whole body) anthropometrics were more highly associated with impact dynamics. In summary, fall-related impact dynamics were strongly associated with body composition, providing support for subject-specific lateral pelvis load prediction models that incorporate soft tissue characteristics. Integrating soft and skeletal tissue properties may have important implications for improving the biomechanical effectiveness of engineering-based protective products.

Hearing impairment increases the risk of hip fracture-related mortality and recurrent hip fractures: A propensity score matching analysis.

PURPOSE: Despite the ongoing rise in hip fractures and the adverse effects of hearing impairment (HI) on increased mortality and morbidity, research addressing the influence of HI on mortality risk or complications in patients with hip fractures remains absent. This study aimed to analyze the effects of HI on mortality and treatment outcomes among patients with hip fracture. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from consecutive patients diagnosed with hip fractures between January 2007 and March 2022 who had auditory examination records. From the initially enrolled 265 patients, data for 58 with HI and 58 without HI (control group) were extracted using a 1:1 propensity score matching. The primary outcome included comparison of mortality rates, and the secondary outcome encompassed the comparison of postoperative medical and surgical complications. RESULTS: The 1-year cumulative mortality rate was not significantly different between the HI and control groups, but the overall cumulative mortality rate was significantly higher in the HI than in the control group (63.0 % and 48.6, respectively; P = 0.046) in a follow-up period of up to 16 years. The HI group had a significantly higher incidence of "second hip fractures due to falls" than the control group (P = 0.016), although no differences in other medical and surgical complications were revealed. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the long-term risk of higher mortality when managing patients with hip fracture and HI is important. To reduce the risk of second hip fractures, paying more attention to fall prevention education and taking a more proactive approach, especially for those with HI.

Increased risk of hip and major osteoporotic fractures in 8463 patients who have undergone stem cell transplantation, a Swedish population-based study.

In this retrospective cohort study of adult stem cell transplanted patients (n = 8463), a significant increased risk of both MOF and hip fractures was seen compared with the Swedish population and occurred in mean more than 2 years after stem cell transplantation. PURPOSE: To explore the risk for osteoporotic fracture in patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) compared with the Swedish population. METHODS: The risk of osteoporotic fractures was determined in a retrospective population cohort study of adult (≥ 18 years) Swedish patients (n = 8463), who were transplanted with HSCT 1997-2016 and compared with all adults living in Sweden during the same period. RESULTS: In the total study group (n = 8463), 90 hip fractures (1.1% both in males and females) and 361 major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) (3.2% in men and 6.0% in women) were identified. In the total study population, the ratio of observed and expected number of hip fracture for women was 1.99 (95% CI 1.39-2.75) and for men 2.54 (95% CI 1.91-3.31). The corresponding ratio for MOF in women was 1.36 (CI 1.18-1.56) and for men 1.61 (CI 1.37-1.88). From 2005 onwards, when differentiation in the registry between allo- and auto-HSCT was possible, the observed number of hip fracture and MOF in allo-HSCT (n = 1865) were significantly increased (observed/expected hip fracture 5.24 (95% CI 3.28-7.93) and observed/expected MOF 2.08 (95% CI 1.63-2.62)). Fractures occurred in mean 2.7 (hip) and 2.5 (MOF) years after allo-HSCT. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was not associated with an increased risk of fracture. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent HSCT had an increased risk of both hip and major osteoporotic fracture compared with the Swedish population and occurred in 4.3% of patients. GVHD was not statistically significantly associated with fracture risk.

Enhancing Emergency Department Pain Management for Older Adults with the Hip Fracture Fast-Track (HFFT) Protocol in a Middle-Income Country.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the Hip Fracture Fast-Track (HFFT) protocol, designed specifically for older patients at our hospital, which commenced on January 1, 2022, on the management of emergency department (ED) pain in older adults with hip fractures. Patients and Methods: Retrospective pre- and post-study data from electronic health records (EHR) at our hospital, using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes S72.0, S72.1, S72.8, and S72.9, were utilized. The study included patients aged 65 years or older who presented to the ED with low-energy, non-pathologic isolated hip fractures or proximal femur fractures. The pre-HFFT period included patients from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021, and the post-HFFT period included patients from January 1, 2022, to October 31, 2023. Data were compared for the proportion of patients undergoing pain evaluation in the ED, before discharge, time to first analgesia, number of patients receiving pain relief in the ED, and the use of fascia iliaca compartment blocks (FICBs) and pericapsular nerve group blocks (PENGBs). Results: The final analysis involved 258 patients, with 116 in the pre-protocol group and 142 in the post-protocol group. The rate of analgesic use increased significantly in the post-HFFT group (78 [67.24%] vs 111 [78.17%], P = 0.049). The rate of pain score screening at triage increased from 51.72% before the HFFT protocol to 86.62% post-HFFT protocol (p < 0.001). Compared with the pre-HFFT protocol, the post-HFFT protocol exhibited a higher rate of FICB (0% vs 14.08%, p < 0.001) and PENGB (0% vs 5.63%, p = 0.009) administration. Conclusion: The HFFT protocol's implementation was associated with improved ED pain evaluation and analgesic administration in older adults with hip fractures. These findings indicate that tailored protocols, such as the HFFT, hold promise for enhancing emergency care for this vulnerable population.

Do All Postoperative Vancouver B2 Fractures Require Revision Arthroplasty With Cementless Stems?

Background: Management of periprosthetic fractures has been guided by the Vancouver classification, which recommends revision for fractures around a loose femoral implant (B2). New studies have challenged this approach, demonstrating acceptable outcomes with internal fixation. This study evaluates our experience with Vancouver B2 fractures, comparing internal fixation to femoral revision. We hypothesized that in select cases with cementless stems, internal fixation would provide acceptable results with reduced morbidity. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of periprosthetic hip fractures treated at our institution between 1 January 2012 and 4 November 2022. We excluded patients who did not have prior radiographs and evidence of stem subsidence, suggestive of a Vancouver B2 fracture. Thirteen patients were included in the analysis. Results: Four patients (31%) underwent revision of the femoral component, 4 patients (31%) underwent plating, and 5 patients (38%) underwent internal fixation with cerclage cabling. The average operative duration was 158 minutes, 203 minutes, and 62 minutes for the revision, plating, and cabling cohorts, respectively (P = .009). Blood loss was 463 cc, 510 cc, and 90 cc for the revision, plating, and cabling cohorts, respectively (P = .036). Three patients in both the revision and plating cohorts each received a transfusion (75%), whereas no patients in the cabling cohort required a transfusion (P = .033). All patients demonstrated fracture healing on the postoperative radiographs. No patients required additional surgery during the follow-up period. Conclusions: We have demonstrated that Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures with intact lateral cortices may be treated with internal fixation with cerclage cabling with excellent results.

Quantitative Analysis of Primary Compressive Trabeculae Distribution in the Proximal Femur of the Elderly.

OBJECTIVE: As osteoporosis progresses, the primary compressive trabeculae (PCT) in the proximal femur remains preserved and is deemed the principal load-bearing structure that links the femoral head with the femoral neck. This study aims to elucidate the distribution patterns of PCT within the proximal femur in the elderly population, and to assess its implications for the development and optimization of internal fixation devices used in hip fracture surgeries. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted from March 2022 to April 2023. A total of 125 patients who underwent bilateral hip joint CT scans in our hospital were enrolled. CT data of the unaffected side of the hip were analyzed. Key parameters regarding the PCT distribution in the proximal femur were measured, including the femoral head's radius (R), the neck-shaft angle (NSA), the angle between the PCT-axis and the head-neck axis (α), the distance from the femoral head center to the PCT-axis (δ), and the lengths of the PCT's bottom and top boundaries (L-bottom and L-top respectively). The impact of gender differences on PCT distribution patterns was also investigated. Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare continuous variables between genders. The relationship between various variables was investigated through Pearson's correlation analysis. RESULTS: PCT was the most prominent bone structure within the femoral head. The average NSA, α, and δ were 126.85 ± 5.85°, 37.33 ± 4.23°, and 0.39 ± 1.22 mm, respectively, showing no significant gender differences (p > 0.05). Pearson's correlation analysis revealed strong correlations between α and NSA (r = -0.689, p < 0.001), and R and L-top (r = 0.623, p < 0.001), with mild correlations observed between δ and NSA (r = -0.487, p < 0.001), and R and L-bottom (r = 0.427, p < 0.001). Importantly, our study establishes a method to accurately localize PCT distribution in true anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the hip joint, facilitating precise screw placement in proximal femur fixation procedures. CONCLUSION: Our study provided unprecedented insights into the distribution patterns of PCT in the proximal femur of the elderly population. The distribution of PCT in the proximal femur is predominantly influenced by anatomical and geometric factors, such as NSA and femoral head size, rather than demographic factors like gender. These insights have crucial implications for the design of internal fixation devices and surgical planning, offering objective guidance for the placement of screws in hip fracture treatments.

Zoledronic acid for hip fracture during initial hospitalization.

Inpatient zoledronic acid (IP-ZA) administered during the initial fracture hospitalization significantly improves the osteoporosis treatment rate. Clinical outcomes of IP-ZA after hip fracture remains uncertain. Here we report a new-user active comparator cohort study that emulated a randomized controlled trial using real-world data and evaluated the risk of death of any cause and radiologically confirmed subsequent new fractures among patients hospitalized for a hip fracture who had received IP-ZA as compared with propensity-matched controls who were not treated with anti-osteoporosis medication within the first-year post fracture. 654 patients who had received IP-ZA and 6877 controls (for whom antiosteoporosis treatment was indicated but no IP-ZA started during index hospitalization) were included in the study. The primary cohort comprised 652 IP-ZA patients (IP-ZA group) and 1926 matched controls (Untreated group) with 71.7% female, 92.1% White, and mean age of 80.9 years. Cumulative all-cause-mortality over the 24 months follow-up for the IP-ZA group was 12.3%, and 20.7% for Untreated group [hazard ratio (HR), 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-0.78, p < 0.001)]. 585 (89.7%) patients in IP-ZA group received only a single dose of ZA during the 24 months, and the death rate of this single dose group was 13.3%, which was significantly lower than that of the Untreated group (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89, p = 0.003). Rates of radiologically confirmed cumulative subsequent new vertebral fractures were 2.0% in IP-ZA group and 5.4% in Untreated group (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.71, P = 0.001). A similarly lower rate of new vertebral fractures was seen in the single dose subgroup (1.9% vs. 5.4%. HR, 0.44; 95% 0.24-0.82, p = 0.008). IP-ZA, administered during the initial hospitalization for hip fracture, was associated with lower all-cause-mortality and risk of radiologically confirmed subsequent new vertebral fractures, and thus offers a mechanism to narrow the treatment gap in patients having sustained a hip fragility fracture.

Hip fracture is a serious complication of osteoporosis affecting approximately 300 000 Americans per year and is associated with a 20-30% one-year mortality rate. Most patients with hip fracture are elderly (average age 80-81 years), with multiple underlying medical conditions and are often unable to timely attend post-hospitalization outpatient follow-up to initiate anti-osteoporosis treatment. As a result, only ~10% of post-hip fracture patients receive treatment for underlying osteoporosis. We have previously reported that zoledronic acid (ZA) administered during initial fracture hospitalization (IP-ZA) is safe and can effectively improve the osteoporosis treatment rate to 70%. The present study analyzed the clinical outcomes of 652 patients who had sustained hip fractures and were treated with IP-ZA and 1926 matched controls and revealed significantly reduced rates of all-cause mortality and vertebral compression fracture (VCF) during a 2-year follow-up period. Of note, nearly 90% of the treated patients received only a single dose of ZA (namely, IP-ZA), suggesting that, for most patients, the only opportunity to receive anti-osteoporosis treatment was during the index fracture hospitalization. Importantly, reduced mortality and VCF rates were readily seen in this single-dose group of patients. Our data suggests that IP-ZA is beneficial for osteoporotic hip fracture.

Association of Serum Lactate Levels Measured in the Emergency Department with 30-Day Mortality in Elderly Patients with Unilateral Hip Fracture.

Background: Hip fractures are frequent injuries in older patients and are associated with high mortality rates. This study assessed the association between serum lactate level and 30-day mortality in older patients with unilateral hip fractures and examined the prognostic value of this association on the clinical outcomes of these patients. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients aged ≥65 years admitted to the emergency department due to low-energy trauma and diagnosed with unilateral hip fracture upon admission. The additional inclusion criteria were patients with independent ambulation or walker or cane assistance before the injury, with available data on serum lactate levels on venous blood gas analysis, and who underwent surgery. Results: Among the 330 included patients, 30.9% experienced postoperative complications and 10.3% died within 30 days. Using a lactate cut-off value of 2 mmol/L to distinguish between living and deceased patients, the sensitivity and specificity were 41% and 88%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that high lactate and low albumin levels and male sex were associated with mortality. Conclusion: Identifying risk factors for mortality in geriatric patients with hip fractures is important. Male sex, low albumin levels, and particularly increased lactate levels were independent predictors of short-term mortality in these patients.

Strategies to improve end-of-life decision-making and palliative care following hip fracture in frail older adults: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Although surgery is the gold standard following a hip fracture, the potential for rehabilitation and survival rates are low in frail older patients. Some patients may derive more benefit from palliative care. The objectives of this review were to identify the available strategies to improve end-of-life decision-making and palliative care for frail patients with hip fractures and to synthetise their level of support. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of the scientific and grey literature, searching seven databases and websites of associations. We included all study designs, expert opinion articles and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Data were synthetised according to the Approach to Patient with Limited Life Expectancy and Hip Fracture framework. The number of research items and their level of evidence were tabulated for each of the recommended strategies. RESULTS: Of the 10 591 items identified, 34 were eligible. The majority of included articles were original research studies (n = 15). Half of the articles and CPGs focused on intervention categories (55%) such as goals of care discussion and comfort care, followed by factors to consider in the end-of-life decision-making process (25%) and prognosis assessments (20%), mainly through the estimation of life expectancy. The level of evidence for these strategies remains low, given the limited number of prospective studies supporting them. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review highlighted that end-of-life care in frail older patients with a hip fracture remains understudied. The strategies identified could be prioritised for future research to improve the well-being of the target population while promoting sustainable resource management.

Impact of emergency department boarding on patients outcomes in hip fractures.

BACKGROUND: Boarding time in the Emergency Department (ED) is an area of concern for all patients and potentially more problematic for the hip fracture population. Identifying patient outcomes impacted by ED boarding and improving emergent care to reduce surgical delay for this patient population is a recognized opportunity. The objective of this study is to examine the impact of ED boarding in relation to patient outcomes in the surgical hip fracture population. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of hip fracture patients who presented at the ED of a Level 1 trauma center between January 2020 and December 2021. Patients were categorized into four quartiles based on boarding time. Study outcomes-hospital length of stay, time to surgery, visit to ICU post-operative, total blood products, in-hospital complications, discharge disposition, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission-were compared among these four quartiles. RESULTS: The outcome endpoints were comparable among the four quartiles except for time to surgery. Time to surgery significantly differed among the quartiles, increasing from 20.39 to 29.03 h (p < 0.001) from the first to fourth quartile. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the existing literature, ED boarding in our study was not associated with adverse outcomes except for time to surgery. By expediting the time to surgery in accordance with established guidelines, adverse outcomes were mitigated even when our patients boarded for a longer duration. System processes including a 24/7 trauma nurse practitioner model, availability of in-house orthopedic surgeons, and timely cardiac evaluation need to be considered in relation to time to surgery, in turn impacting ED boarding and patient outcomes.

Should patients with exceptional longevity be treated for osteoporosis after a hip fracture?

BACKGROUND: There are no studies focusing on treatment for osteoporosis in patients with exceptional longevity after suffering a hip fracture. OBJECTIVE: To assess the advisability of initiating treatment for osteoporosis after a hip fracture according to the incidence of new fragility fractures after discharge, risk factors for mortality and long-term survival. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: A tertiary university hospital serving a population of ~425 000 inhabitants in Barcelona. SUBJECTS: All patients >95 years old admitted with a fragility hip fracture between December 2009 and September 2015 who survived admission were analysed until the present time. METHODS: Pre-fracture ambulation ability and new fragility fractures after discharge were recorded. Risk factors for 1-year and all post-discharge mortality were calculated with multivariate Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses were performed. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-five patients were included. Median survival time was 1.32 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.065-1.834], with a maximum of 9.2 years. Male sex [hazard ratio (HR) 2.488, 95% CI 1.420-4.358] and worse previous ability to ambulate (HR 2.291, 95% CI 1.417-3.703) were predictors of mortality. After discharge and up to death or the present time, 10 (5.7%) patients had a new fragility fracture, half of them during the first 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Few new fragility fractures occurred after discharge and half of these took place in the first 6 months. The decision to start treatment of osteoporosis should be individualised, bearing in mind that women and patients with better previous ambulation ability will have a better chance of survival.

A Staged Approach using Machine Learning and Uncertainty Quantification to Predict the Risk of Hip Fracture.

Hip fractures present a significant healthcare challenge, especially within aging populations, where they are often caused by falls. These fractures lead to substantial morbidity and mortality, emphasizing the need for timely surgical intervention. Despite advancements in medical care, hip fractures impose a significant burden on individuals and healthcare systems. This paper focuses on the prediction of hip fracture risk in older and middle-aged adults, where falls and compromised bone quality are predominant factors. We propose a novel staged model that combines advanced imaging and clinical data to improve predictive performance. By using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to extract features from hip DXA images, along with clinical variables, shape measurements, and texture features, our method provides a comprehensive framework for assessing fracture risk. The study cohort included 547 patients, with 94 experiencing hip fracture. A staged machine learning-based model was developed using two ensemble models: Ensemble 1 (clinical variables only) and Ensemble 2 (clinical variables and DXA imaging features). This staged approach used uncertainty quantification from Ensemble 1 to decide if DXA features are necessary for further prediction. Ensemble 2 exhibited the highest performance, achieving an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.9541, an accuracy of 0.9195, a sensitivity of 0.8078, and a specificity of 0.9427. The staged model also performed well, with an AUC of 0.8486, an accuracy of 0.8611, a sensitivity of 0.5578, and a specificity of 0.9249, outperforming Ensemble 1, which had an AUC of 0.5549, an accuracy of 0.7239, a sensitivity of 0.1956, and a specificity of 0.8343. Furthermore, the staged model suggested that 54.49% of patients did not require DXA scanning. It effectively balanced accuracy and specificity, offering a robust solution when DXA data acquisition is not always feasible. Statistical tests confirmed significant differences between the models, highlighting the advantages of the advanced modeling strategies. Our staged approach offers a cost-effective holistic view of patients' health. It could identify individuals at risk with a high accuracy but reduce the unnecessary DXA scanning. Our approach has great promise to guide interventions to prevent hip fractures with reduced cost and radiation.

Characteristics and Effects of Home-Based Digital Health Interventions on Functional Outcomes in Older Patients With Hip Fractures After Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions (DHIs) have been used to improve postoperative functional ability in older patients with hip fractures. However, there is limited information on the characteristics of home-based DHIs, and controversy exists regarding their impact on functional outcomes in this population. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide an overview of the characteristics and effects of home-based DHIs on functional outcomes in older patients with hip fractures after surgery. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Five electronic medical databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ProQuest, and CINAHL) were searched up until January 3, 2023. We included clinical trials or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English involving home-based DHIs for postoperative care among older patients with hip fractures. Excluded studies involved patients not hospitalized, not discharged to home, not directly using DHIs, or with inaccessible full text. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022370550. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data (SP and NB). Disagreements were resolved through discussion and agreement with the third author (KP). Home-based DHIs were characterized in terms of purpose and content, mode of delivery, and health care provider. Functional outcomes assessed included Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Summary measures were calculated using mean differences with 95% CIs. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk-of-Bias 2 assessment tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I for non-RCTs. The quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). RESULTS: Of 2125 identified studies, 16 were included in the systematic review, involving 1467 participants. Six studies were included in the meta-analysis (4 for TUG, 4 for SPPB, and 2 for FIM). Home-based DHIs predominantly involved communication and feedback, education, and telerehabilitation. Telephone calls were the most common mode of delivery, followed by web-based software and mobile apps. Physical therapists were the main health care providers. The meta-analysis showed that home-based DHIs improved functional outcomes compared with usual care, with decreased TUG scores (mean difference=-7.89; 95% CI -10.34 to -5.45; P<.001), significantly increased SPPB scores (mean difference=1.11; 95% CI 0.51-1.72; P<.001), and increased FIM scores (mean difference=7.98; 95% CI 5.73-10.24; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Home-based DHIs that integrate communication and feedback, education, and telerehabilitation have demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing functional outcomes among older patients recovering from hip fractures after surgery. These interventions are commonly administered by physical therapists, who play a crucial role in facilitating and guiding the rehabilitation process. However, while the existing evidence supports the efficacy of such interventions, further research is needed to enhance our understanding and optimize the implementation of home-based DHIs for this specific population.

Preoperative inflammatory biomarkers reveal renal involvement in postsurgical mortality in hip fracture patients: an exploratory study.

Background: Hip fractures in frail patients result in excess mortality not accounted for by age or comorbidities. The mechanisms behind the high risk of mortality remain undetermined but are hypothesized to be related to the inflammatory status of frail patients. Methods: In a prospective observational exploratory cohort study of hospitalized frail hip fracture patients, 92 inflammatory markers were tested in pre-operative serum samples and markers were tested against 6-month survival post-hip fracture surgery and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). After correcting for multiple testing, adjustments for comorbidities and demographics were performed on the statistically significant markers. Results: Of the 92 markers tested, circulating levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) and interleukin-15 receptor alpha (IL15RA), both involved in renal disease, were significantly correlated with 6-month mortality (27.5% overall) after correcting for multiple testing. The incidence of postoperative AKI (25.4%) was strongly associated with 6-month mortality, odds ratio = 10.57; 95% CI [2.76-40.51], and with both markers plus estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)- cystatin C (CYSC) but not eGFR-CRE. The effect of these markers on mortality was significantly mediated by their effect on postoperative AKI. Conclusion: High postoperative mortality in frail hip fracture patients is highly correlated with preoperative biomarkers of renal function in this pilot study. The effect of preoperative circulating levels of FGF-23, IL15RA, and eGFR-CYSC on 6-month mortality is in part mediated by their effect on postoperative AKI. Creatinine-derived preoperative renal function measures were very poorly correlated with postoperative outcomes in this group.