Nanostructured Cellulose-Gellan-Xyloglucan-Lysozyme Dressing Seeded with Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Deep Second-Degree Burn Treatment.

PURPOSE: In deep burns, wound contraction and hypertrophic scar formation can generate functional derangement and debilitation of the affected part. In order to improve the quality of healing in deep second-degree burns, we developed a new treatment in a preclinical model using nanostructured membranes seeded with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). METHODS: Membranes were obtained by reconstitution of bacterial cellulose (reconstituted membrane [RM]) and produced by a dry-cast process, then RM was incorporated with 10% tamarind xyloglucan plus gellan gum 1:1 and 10% lysozyme (RMGT-LZ) and with 10% gellan gum and 10% lysozyme (RMG-LZ). Membrane hydrophobic/hydrophilic characteristics were investigated by static/dynamic contact-angle measurements. They were cultivated with MSCs, and cell adhesion, proliferation, and migration capacity was analyzed with MTT assays. Morphological and topographic characteristics were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. MSC patterns in flow cytometry and differentiation into adipocytes and osteocytes were checked. In vivo assays used RMG-LZ and RMGT-LZ (with and without MSCs) in Rattus norvegicus rats submitted to burn protocol, and histological sections and collagen deposits were analyzed and immunocytochemistry assay performed. RESULTS: In vitro results demonstrated carboxyl and amine groups made the membranes moderately hydrophobic and xyloglucan inclusion decreased wettability, favoring MSC adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. In vivo, we obtained 40% and 60% reduction in acute/chronic inflammatory infiltrates, 96% decrease in injury area, increased vascular proliferation and collagen deposition, and complete epithelialization after 30 days. MSCs were detected in burned tissue, confirming they had homed and proliferated in vivo. CONCLUSION: Nanostructured cellulose-gellan-xyloglucan-lysozyme dressings, especially when seeded with MSCs, improved deep second-degree burn regeneration.

Successful management of the open abdomen with hydrocolloid dressing in a resource-constrained setting.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and detail the management of a difficult, long-term, open abdomen in a resource constraint setting with the use of Hydrocolloid dressing. METHOD: An observational retrospective study was conducted at a single level-1 trauma center. Over a 5-year period, all the open abdomen patients were evaluated and the cohorts who were treated with Hydrocolloid dressings were described in detail from their admission to their discharge. RESULTS: During this period, there were 147 open abdomens. 7.5% (11) patients required long-term open abdomen management, in which Hydrocolloid dressing was utilized. Of this group, there were no entero/colonic-atmospheric fistulas, and there was either de-novo complete skin coverage, successful skin graft placement, or definitive abdominal wall repair in all the patients. De-novo complete skin coverage took an average of 7.4 months. All the patients were discharged home after an average of 107 days hospitalized. CONCLUSION: Despite not being an optimal management of an open abdomen, there are always a small group of these patients who lose abdominal domain, are critically ill or injured, and have prolonged hospitalization with an open abdomen. In this cohort, and especially in resource constraint settings, Hydrocolloid dressing is a cost-efficient, simple, and effective method to treat the 'long-term' open abdomens.

Management of giant omphalocele with a simple and efficient nonsurgical silo.

INTRODUCTION: Giant omphaloceles can be a challenge for pediatric surgeons and neonatologists worldwide. It is a rare and low-frequency congenital anomaly with no standardized management schemes or treatment protocols. Over the past few decades, we have developed a simple and efficient staged management for giant omphaloceles that allows definitive closure in the neonatal period, the results of which we outline in this report. MATERIAL AND METHODS: With IRB approval, a retrospective and multicentric cohort study was carried out between 1994 and 2019 with patients with giant omphalocele defined as an abdominal wall defect greater than 5 cm in diameter and/or that contains more than 50% of the liver within the sac. We included all patients managed with the nonsurgical silo technique. Data on demographics, gestational age, associated malformations, amnion reduction and inversion time, anatomic closure, requirement of a mesh, intra- and post-silo complications, mortality and follow-up were collected. The technique consists of the construction of a silo with an adhesive hydrocolloid dressing (DuodermⓇ) to achieve an omphalocele staged-reduction until complete abdominal reintegration of the liver and bowel preservation of the amnion sac. This also enables the simulation of abdominal closure before definitive surgical closure, being managed in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). RESULTS: Forty patients, 21 of whom were female, were managed with this technique. The average weight was 2900 gs (890-3900), and the median gestational age was 38 weeks (28-40). In total, 37.5% of cases had an associated comorbidity. The average silo reduction time was 7.3 days (0-35), the average time of amnion inversion was 5 days (2-9), and the average time to closure was 14.6 days (6-38). Anatomical closure was achieved in 95% of cases. In 4 patients, an absorbable mesh was used to reinforce the anatomical closure, and in 2 patients (5%), a mesh (DualmeshⓇ) was required to achieve an abdominal closure. There was no mortality associated with this nonsurgical silo technique. The average follow-up time was 60 (6 - 288) months. CONCLUSION: The staged silo management of giant omphalocele in this series is safe and effective and reduces the time to closure and potential morbidity and mortality compared with traditional surgical or medical management.

Using transparent polyurethane film and hydrocolloid dressings to prevent pressure ulcers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance and effectiveness of a hydrocolloid dressing (HD) and a transparent polyurethane film (PF) in preventing pressure ulcer (PU) development. METHOD: The study was conducted in the intensive care unit, coronary care unit and medical clinic of the Holy House of Mercy of Passos, Brazil. Data were collected 48 hours after admission and during hospitalisation. The Braden scale was used for PU risk assessment. Consecutive eligible patients without PUs were randomly assigned by lottery to the two groups, either the HD or PF group. RESULTS: Of the 160 eligible patients, significant between-group differences were found in the mean total number of dressing changes (HD, 6.09±1.655 changes; PF, 5.59±2.036 changes; p=0.010), and mean number of dressing changes in the sacral region (HD, 2.50±0.871; PF, 2.05±0.825; p=0.001), with the PF group requiring significantly fewer changes than the HD group. The most common reasons for changing dressings in both groups were moisture (PF 51.1%; HD 47.9%) and shear (HD 43%; PF 38.9%), with a significant difference in shear between groups. The incidence of PUs was significantly lower (p=0.038) in the PF group (8.7%) compared with that in the HD group (15%). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the transparent polyurethane film had a better performance and was more effective than the hydrocolloid dressing in preventing PU development.