Venetoclax combined with azacitidine in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: a case report and comprehensive review on the current and future treatment.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is an extremely rare hematological malignancy with a highly aggressive behavior and median survival of <2 years. Especially, most BPDCN patients present with extensive and non-specific skin lesions, usually leading to misdiagnosis as a skin disease and delay therapy. As for treatment, most patients with BPDCN experience relapse shortly after treatment with the traditional regimens. The alleviation of skin symptoms reflects the effects of clinical treatments. Herein, we report a case of a 71-year-old man with intermittent and gradually expanding skin lesions over his chest, abdomen, and back for 1 year. On admission, physical examination revealed extensive skin lesions and multiple enlarged lymph nodes. Laboratory examinations showed pancytopenia and numerous malignant cells in the peripheral blood smear (60%), bone marrow aspirate smear (73.5%). Immunophenotyping using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry presented large numbers of BPDCN cells in the bone marrow, cervical lymph nodes and dermal tissue. PET/CT revealed multiple enlarged lymph nodes and splenomegaly. Once the diagnosis was identified as BPDCN, the patient began treatment with the oral BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax and subcutaneously administered azacitidine. After the first course, skin lesions reduced markedly and complete remission was achieved in the bone marrow. Our study and current cumulative data according to reviewing systematically suggest that venetoclax combined with azacitidine is safe, effective, and applicable in the treatment of BPDCN, especially for elderly relapsed/refractory patients. This study, therefore, significantly contributes to the literature on the current and future treatment for BPDCN.

Patients' perspectives on oral decitabine/cedazuridine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms.

Background: Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are guideline-recommended treatment for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS). However, a prior survey of patients with MDS reported challenges with intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) HMA therapies, including pain related to treatment administration and interference with daily activities; most patients also indicated a preference to switch to an oral therapy if one were available. Objectives: This study evaluated the perspectives of US patients with MDS receiving oral decitabine/cedazuridine (DEC-C), an alternative to IV/SC HMAs. Methods: An online survey was conducted among adult patients with MDS in the United States (10 November 2022 to 5 December 2022) who had filled a prescription for oral DEC-C between 2021 and 2022. Results: A total of 150 patients completed the survey; 61% were aged ⩾60 years and 63% were male. Of these, 123 (82%) were still receiving oral DEC-C, and 27 (18%) had stopped oral DEC-C treatment. Half (50%) of patients had received oral DEC-C for ⩾6 months. The majority reported that treatment was convenient (83%) and that they were satisfied with treatment (86%). Most patients also reported very little/no interference with regular daily activities (82%), social activities (78%), and productivity (78%). When queried about negative impacts on quality of life (QOL), treatment side effects were the most commonly reported (30% of respondents). Among patients who had previously received IV/SC HMAs (n = 91), most agreed that oral DEC-C interfered less with daily life (91%) and had experienced improvement in QOL (85%) compared with previous treatment; 91% reported that oral DEC-C reduced the number of times they needed to travel to a healthcare facility. Conclusion: Survey results suggest very little/no impact on regular daily activities and improved QOL with oral DEC-C relative to IV/SC HMAs, highlighting the potential for oral DEC-C to reduce the treatment burden associated with parenteral HMA therapy.

Azacitidine treatment for myeloid leukemia associated with Down syndrome: A nationwide retrospective study in Japan.

Hypomethylating agent treatment for myeloid leukemia associated with Down syndrome (ML-DS) has been scarcely reported. Herein, we collected information on azacitidine treatment for ML-DS in Japan. Forty-eight cycles of azacitidine treatment were performed for 12 patients, including 11 relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients. In 40 cycles, azacitidine was used as monotherapy. No azacitidine-related death was observed. One cycle concurrently administered with methotrexate-based intrathecal therapy was discontinued due to toxicities. Only 4 of the 19 cycles given in non-remission achieved complete or partial remission. In conclusion, although most toxicities were acceptable, azacitidine monotherapy might be insufficient for R/R ML-DS cases.

Favorable Radiographic Response in a Patient With an Oligodendroglioma Treated With Azacitidine and Venetoclax for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

The standard chemotherapy for treating oligodendrogliomas consists of a combination of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV). The combination of hypomethylating agents like azacitidine and BCL2 inhibitors like venetoclax has not been formally studied in the treatment of glial tumors. The combination of these two drugs is commonly used to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with IDH-mutant disease being a particularly sensitive subtype. The use of azacitidine for the treatment of IDH-mutant gliomas has been reported in the literature, with mixed results that might suggest at least some benefits in a subtype of patients. It is also reported in the literature that the BCL2 gene is associated with treatment resistance and tumor recurrence in gliomas. Here, we present a patient with an oligodendroglioma who was treated with a conventional chemotherapy regimen for AML and, at the same time, had a favorable radiographic response to his brain tumor.

Less is more: An analysis of venetoclax and hypomethylating agent post-induction treatment modifications in AML.

Venetoclax (Ven) combined with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) enhances survival in elderly/unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, yet often necessitates regimen modifications due to intolerance. However, it is unclear how these modifications affect patient outcome. This retrospective cohort study evaluates the impact of post-induction HMA/Ven regimen modifications on disease progression and survival. This study reviewed 142 AML patients treated with HMA/Ven within the Northwell Health System from January 2019 to December 2022. To assess the impact of post-induction regimen modifications, patients were grouped according to median days between cycles (≤34 or ≥35 days cycle intervals) and median Ven days per cycle (≤14 or ≥15 days/cycle) based on only cycle 3 and beyond. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were employed for univariate and multivariate assessments, respectively. There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival (mPFS)(11.6 vs 11.8 months, p = 0.73) or median overall survival (mOS)(15.1 vs 21.8 months, p = 0.16) between cycle interval groups. However, there was a clinically and statistically significant advantage in mPFS (15.8 vs 8.7 months, p = 0.01) and mOS (24.7 vs 11.3 months, p = 0.006) for patients with a median of ≤14 Ven days/cycle compared to ≥15 Ven days/cycle. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ≤14 days of Ven for cycle 3 and beyond was an independent predictor of decreased mortality (HR 0.18, CI 0.07-0.48, p = 0.0007). Extended cycle intervals did not adversely affect mortality while reduced Ven duration per cycle post-induction was associated with improved survival in elderly AML patients.

Clinical outcomes of hypomethylating agents and venetoclax in newly diagnosed unfit and relapsed/refractory paediatric, adolescent and young adult acute myeloid leukaemia patients.

Venetoclax (VEN) combined with hypomethylating agents (HMA) decitabine or azacitidine is used for adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), but its application in paediatric, adolescent and young adult (AYA) AML lacks prospective studies. We performed a retrospective chart review of paediatric and AYA AML patients treated with HMA + VEN at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Centre. Twenty-seven patients received 30 HMA + VEN treatment courses for relapsed/refractory (R/R, n = 21) or newly diagnosed (n = 9) AML due to ineligibility for intensive chemotherapy. The R/R cohort had high-risk cytomolecular genetic alterations and prior extensive treatments, with 50% (n = 9) of relapse patients (n = 18) having undergone haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Venetoclax treatment using the 400 mg adult exposure-equivelant dosing (AED) had a median duration of 21 days (range 7-30 days). Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia (90%), anaemia (64%), thrombocytopenia (64%) and febrile neutropenia (44%). The overall complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rate was 73% (77% minimal residual disease [MRD] negativity <0.1%), with 60% undergoing HSCT. Among newly diagnosed patients (n = 9), 89% achieved CR/CRi (78% MRD negativity) and 78% proceeded to HSCT. The R/R cohort (n = 21) showed a 67% CR/CRi rate (71% MRD negativity), with 52% undergoing HSCT. These findings support the safety and efficacy of HMA + VEN in paediatric/AYA AML, indicating it as a viable option for patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Further studies are necessary to determine optimal venetoclax dosing, chemotherapy combinations and pharmacokinetics in this population.

Real-world treatments and clinical outcomes in unfit AML patients receiving first-line treatment or best supportive care in Italy (CURRENT study).

Real-world data on treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy are lacking before the advent of precision medicine in this setting. Herein, we present the Italian sub-analysis of the CURRENT study in AML patients unfit for first line intensive chemotherapy, evaluating patients' outcomes between 2015 and 2018. Among 74 evaluable patients, 62 received systemic treatments (most used therapy was hypomethylating agents), while 12 best supportive care. Key results include both efficacy and safety data, as well as HCRU and treatment patterns. In first-line therapy cohort median OS was 13.4 months vs. 2.7 months for BSC.

Emerging applications of hypomethylating agents in the treatment of glioblastoma (Review).

DNA hypomethylating agents (HMAs) such as decitabine and 5-azacytidine have established roles in the treatment paradigms for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia, where they are considered to exert their anticancer effects by restoring the expression of tumor suppressor genes. Due to their relatively favorable adverse effect profile and known ability to pass through the blood-brain barrier, applications in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) and other central nervous system malignancies are under active investigation. The present review examines the types of HMAs currently available, their known and less-understood antineoplastic mechanisms, and the evidence to date of their preclinical and clinical efficacy in glioblastoma and other solid malignancies. The present review discusses the potential synergies HMAs may have with established and emerging GBM treatments, including temozolomide, immune checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccines. Recent successes and setbacks in clinical trials for newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM are summarized in order to highlight opportunities for HMAs to improve therapeutic responses. Challenges for future clinical trials are also assessed.

Real-world effectiveness of first-line azacitidine or decitabine with or without venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia patients unfit for intensive therapy.

BACKGROUND: First-line treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive therapy is the combination of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) with venetoclax (VEN). However, retrospective data confirming the benefits of this regimen outside of clinical trials have shown conflicting results. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of outcomes with first-line HMA-VEN versus HMA in AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients were included from three German hospitals (125 HMA-VEN, 88 HMA). Median overall survival in the HMA-VEN cohort was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1-14.7) versus 4.9 months (3.1-7.1) with HMA. After 1 year, 42% (95% CI, 33-54) and 19% (12-30) of patients were alive, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.88). After adjusting for clinical and molecular baseline characteristics, treatment with HMA-VEN remained significantly associated with both prolonged survival (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.77) and time to next treatment (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.85). Patients who achieved recovery of peripheral blood counts had a favorable prognosis (HR for death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.84). DISCUSSION: These data align with findings from the pivotal VIALE-A trial and support the use of HMA-VEN in patients unfit for intensive therapy.

Do NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations modify prognosis in patients treated with non-intensive regimens?

FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations are key to defining the genetic risk profile of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We aimed to assess the prognostic features of the FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations in old and/or unfit individuals with AML treated with non-intensive therapies in the era before azacitidine-venetoclax approbation. The results of various non-intensive regimens were also compared. We conducted a retrospective analysis that included patients treated with different non-intensive regimens, between 2007 and 2020 from PETHEMA AML registry. We compiled 707 patients with a median age of 74 years and median follow-up time of 37.7 months. FLT3-ITD patients (N = 98) showed a non-significant difference in overall survival (OS) compared to FLT3-ITD negative-patients (N = 608) (P = 0.17, median OS was 5 vs 7.3 months respectively). NPM1-mutated patients (N = 144) also showed a non-significant difference with NPM1 wild type (N = 519) patients (P = 0.25, median OS 7.2 vs 6.8 respectively). In the Cox regression analysis neither NPM1 nor FLT3-ITD nor age were significant prognostic variables for OS prediction. Abnormal karyotype and a high leukocyte count showed a statistically significant deleterious effect. Azacitidine also showed better survival compared to FLUGA (low dose cytarabine plus fludarabine). NPM1 and FLT3-ITD seem to lack prognostic value in older/unfit AML patients treated with non-intensive regimens other than azacitidine-venetoclax combination.

Real-world study of the use of azacitidine in myelodysplasia in Australia.

Hypomethylating agents are the most widely used upfront therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who are not suitable for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In Australia, azacitidine was, until recently, the only approved and subsidized treatment for patients with intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and low blast acute myeloid leukemia. We analyzed prescription data to evaluate the real-world persistence and overall survival (OS) of patients prescribed azacitidine for the first time in Australia. A retrospective cohort analysis of patients who had been prescribed Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)-listed azacitidine for the first time, between January 2016 and April 2021, was conducted using the PBS 10% dataset. Treatment persistence and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The impact of the number of treatment cycles and treatment adherence on OS was also estimated. There were 351 patients in the PBS 10% dataset who initiated treatment with azacitidine. The average age (standard deviation [SD]) at azacitidine initiation was 71.9 (11.1) years and the average number (SD) of azacitidine prescriptions was 5.6 (0.2). The median persistence on azacitidine was 15.6 months, and the OS was 13.4 months. The median OS for patients who had six or more cycles of azacitidine treatment was greater compared to patients who had five or less cycles of treatment. The data from this real-world study illustrate the unmet medical needs of patients with MDS treated with azacitidine in Australia. The majority of patients are not treated with the optimal number of cycles of azacitidine, which is negatively correlated with patient outcomes.

Development of the treatment preference in myelodysplasia questionnaire for clinicians, carers, and patients.

This study reports the development activities for the Treatment Preference Myelodysplasia Questionnaires (TPMQ) for clinicians (mTPMQ), carers (cTPMQ), and patients (pTPMQ). These tools are intended to evaluate treatment preferences for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). This was a non-interventional, cross-sectional qualitative interview study consisting of interviews with clinicians, patients, and those caring for patients with MDS. All participants were located in Australia and data were collected from qualitative mixed-method interviews composed of concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing related to initial drafts of the questionnaires. Fifteen individuals participated in interviews (five from each group). Based on the concept elicitation portion of interviews, concepts of importance were classified and reasons for treatment preference were documented. From cognitive debriefing, the questionnaires were generally deemed to be clear and easy to understand. Participant input from both concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing portions was used to revise initial drafts of the questionnaires. The mTPMQ, cTPMQ, and pTPMQ were developed with direct input from clinicians, patients, and caregivers to assess the key concepts of interest related to the preference for the treatment of MDS and are ready to be used and evaluated further in clinical trials.

Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine Is an Effective Ambulatory Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis Refractory to JAK2 Inhibitor Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes are dismal for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who are no longer responsive to JAK2 inhibitors (JAKi) and/or have increasing blast cell numbers. Although prior reports have suggested the benefits of intravenous decitabine (DAC) combined with ruxolitinib for patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) accelerated/blast phase (AP/BP), decitabine-cedazuridine (DEC-C), an oral fixed-dose combination providing equivalent pharmacokinetic exposure, has not been evaluated in MF. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 14 patients with high-risk MF refractory to ruxolitinib or MPN-AP (10-19% blasts) treated with DEC-C +/- JAKi at Mount Sinai Hospital from 2021 to 2024. RESULTS: The cohort was elderly (median age,76 years) and almost uniformly possessed high risk mutations with 13 of the 14 patients progressing on JAKi therapy. With a median follow-up of 9.4 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 29 months for the entire cohort. Median OS was 10.8 months for MPN-AP and was not reached for ruxolitinib refractory MF patients. All patients (n = 9) receiving > 4 cycles of DEC-C had clinical benefit exemplified by a reduction in blast cell numbers, spleen size, and lack of progression to MPN-BP (78%). Furthermore, 3/14 patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant. Myelosuppression was a common adverse event which was managed by reducing the number of days of administration of DEC-C from 5 to 3 per cycle. CONCLUSIONS: This report demonstrates the feasibility, tolerability, and clinical benefit of an exclusively ambulatory regimen for high-risk, elderly patients with advanced MF which warrants further evaluation in a prospective clinical trial.

A pharmacodynamic assay to monitor treatment with the hypomethylating cytosine analogs, decitabine and azacitidine.

Hypomethylating therapies using decitabine or azacitidine are actively investigated to treat acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, as maintenance therapy after allogenic stem cell transplant and hemoglobinopathies. The therapeutic mechanism is to de-repress genes that have been turned off through oncogenesis or development via methylation. The therapy can be non-cytotoxic at low dosage, sparing healthy stem cells and operating on committed precursors. Because the methods of determining maximum tolerated dose are not well suited to this paradigm, and because the mechanism of action, which is depletion of DNA methylase 1 (DNMT1), is complex and dependent on passing through a cell cycle, a pharmacodynamic assay that measures DNMT1 can inform clinical trials aimed at establishing and improving therapy. Herein, we provide an assay that measures DNMT1 relative levels in circulating T cells of peripheral blood.

Advances in the management of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: future prospects.

Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are defined using a number of prognostic scoring systems that include the degree of cytopenias, percentage of blasts, cytogenetic alterations, and more recently genomic data. HR-MDS encompasses characteristics such as progressive cytopenias, increased bone marrow blasts, unfavorable cytogenetics, and an adverse mutational profile. Survival is generally poor, and patients require therapy to improve outcomes. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs), such as azacitidine, decitabine, and more recently, oral decitabine/cedazuridine, are the only approved therapies for HR-MDS. These are often continued until loss of response, progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Combinations including an HMA plus other drugs have been investigated but have not demonstrated better outcomes compared to single-agent HMA. Moreover, in a disease of high genomic complexity such as HR-MDS, therapy targeting specific genomic abnormalities is of interest. This review will examine the biological underpinnings of HR-MDS, its therapeutic landscape in the frontline and relapsed settings, as well as the impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only known curative intervention for this disease.

Decitabine cytotoxicity is promoted by dCMP deaminase DCTD and mitigated by SUMO-dependent E3 ligase TOPORS.

The nucleoside analogue decitabine (or 5-aza-dC) is used to treat several haematological cancers. Upon its triphosphorylation and incorporation into DNA, 5-aza-dC induces covalent DNA methyltransferase 1 DNA-protein crosslinks (DNMT1-DPCs), leading to DNA hypomethylation. However, 5-aza-dC's clinical outcomes vary, and relapse is common. Using genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 screens, we map factors determining 5-aza-dC sensitivity. Unexpectedly, we find that loss of the dCMP deaminase DCTD causes 5-aza-dC resistance, suggesting that 5-aza-dUMP generation is cytotoxic. Combining results from a subsequent genetic screen in DCTD-deficient cells with the identification of the DNMT1-DPC-proximal proteome, we uncover the ubiquitin and SUMO1 E3 ligase, TOPORS, as a new DPC repair factor. TOPORS is recruited to SUMOylated DNMT1-DPCs and promotes their degradation. Our study suggests that 5-aza-dC-induced DPCs cause cytotoxicity when DPC repair is compromised, while cytotoxicity in wild-type cells arises from perturbed nucleotide metabolism, potentially laying the foundations for future identification of predictive biomarkers for decitabine treatment.

A real-world experience of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents vs. monotherapy hypomethylating agents in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients.

Introduction: Current clinical research has reported the effectiveness and safety of venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents (VEN-HMA) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Thus, this study aimed to examine the effectiveness and safety of VEN-HMA therapy in patients with MDS and CMML and compared its short-term and long-term therapeutic effects with HMA monotherapy. Method: We analyzed data from our center, comprising 19 patients with MDS and CMML who received VEN-HMA therapy, compared to 32 patients treated with HMA monotherapy. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) in the VEN-HMA group was 73.7%, compared to 59.4% in the HMA group. The survival analysis revealed that the median overall survival (mOS) time in the VEN-HMA group was 16 months, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) time of 9 months, both of which were longer than those observed in the HMA group (p < 0.05). Key adverse events (AEs) included grade 3-4 neutropenia (89.5% in VEN-HMA group vs. 87.5% in HMA group), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (73.7% vs. 71.9%), and anemia (73.7% vs. 90.6%). Infection of grade 3 or higher occurred in 63.2% of patients in the VEN-HMA group and 65.6% of patients in the HMA group. Discussion: Our study has confirmed the effectiveness and safety of the combined treatment of HMAs and venetoclax, which offers significant advantages to patients due to the relatively high and rapid response rates.

Ex vivo characterization of acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing hypomethylating agents and venetoclax regimen reveals a venetoclax-specific effect on non-suppressive regulatory T cells and bona fide PD-1+TIM3+ exhausted CD8+ T cells.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive heterogeneous disease characterized by several alterations of the immune system prompting disease progression and treatment response. The therapies available for AML can affect lymphocyte function, limiting the efficacy of immunotherapy while hindering leukemia-specific immune reactions. Recently, the treatment based on Venetoclax (VEN), a specific B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor, in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or low-dose cytarabine, has emerged as a promising clinical strategy in AML. To better understand the immunological effect of VEN treatment, we characterized the phenotype and immune checkpoint (IC) receptors' expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from AML patients after the first and second cycle of HMA in combination with VEN. HMA and VEN treatment significantly increased the percentage of naïve CD8+ T cells and TIM-3+ CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and reduced cytokine-secreting non-suppressive T regulatory cells (Tregs). Of note, a comparison between AML patients treated with HMA only and HMA in combination with VEN revealed the specific contribution of VEN in modulating the immune cell repertoire. Indeed, the reduction of cytokine-secreting non-suppressive Tregs, the increased TIM-3 expression on CD8+ T cells, and the reduced co-expression of PD-1 and TIM-3 on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are all VEN-specific. Collectively, our study shed light on immune modulation induced by VEN treatment, providing the rationale for a novel therapeutic combination of VEN and IC inhibitors in AML patients.