Consecuencias de la selección inadecuada de la ecuación de estimación de la tasa de filtración glomerular / Consequences of inadequate selection of estimated glomerular filtration rate equation / Consequências da seleção inadequada da equação de estimação da taxa de filtração glomerular

El objetivo del trabajo consistió en evaluar, en una muestra de estudiantes, las consecuencias sobre la Tasa de Filtración Glomerular estimada (TFGe) por MDRD-4, MDRD-4 IDMS y CKD-EPI producidas por la selección inadecuada de las fórmulas según la trazabilidad de la creatininemia utilizada y valorar el efecto sobre la categorización por estadio G de TFG al utilizar valores numéricos de MDRD-4 y MDRD-4 IDMS≥60 mL/min/1,73 m². Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, analítico, de corte transversal con 100 alumnos de bioquímica, que participaron voluntariamente. Se determinó la creatininemia por métodos Jaffé cinéticos, valores trazables y no trazables al Isotopic Dilution Mass Spectroscopy (IDMS). La TFGe se calculó por las fórmulas MDRD-4, MDRD-4 IDMS y CKD-EPI introduciendo en cada fórmula valores de creatinina trazables y no trazables a IDMS. Los estudiantes se clasificaron por categoría G según los resultados. El mal empleo de las ecuaciones respecto a la trazabilidad de la creatininemia según fueron diseñadas cambió sensiblemente los valores de TFGe (p<0,05) y la proporción de jóvenes por estadio G respecto a lo hallado con el empleo adecuado (MDRD-4. G1: 67,4% vs. 53,7%; G2: 32,6% vs. 45,3%; G3a: 0,0% vs. 1,0%. MDRD-4 IDMS. G1: 37,9% vs. 59,0%; G2: 56,8% vs. 40,0%; G3a: 5,3% vs. 1,0%. CKD-EPI. G1: 70,5% vs. 85,3%; G2: 29,5% vs. 14,7%). El uso de valores numéricos para TFGe por MDRD-4 y MDRD-4 IDMS≥60 mL/min/1,73 m² infraestimó lo obtenido con CKD-EPI, que puede informarse numéricamente en ese rango. Ambas situaciones conllevan errores que afectan la categorización funcional renal de pacientes y la prevalencia en estudios epidemiológicos.

The objective of this work was to evaluate the consequences on the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) by MDRD-4, MDRD-4 IDMS and CKD-EPI produced by the inadequate equation selection according to the creatinine traceability in a sample of biochemistry students and to assess the effect on G categorization if numerical values of the MDRD-4 and MDRD-4 IDMS equations≥60 mL/ min/1.73 m² were used. A descriptive, analytical, cross-sectional study was performed between 2014- 2016, 100 volunteer students of biochemistry were studied. Creatininemia was determined by kinetic Jaffé methods, traceable and non-traceable to Isotopic Dilution Mass Spectroscopy (IDMS). The eGFR was estimated by the MDRD-4, MDRD-4 IDMS and CKD-EPI formula, by feeding each formula with traceable and non traceable creatinine values to IDMS. Students were classified by category G according to the results obtained. Inappropriate equation use regarding the traceability of the creatinine for which they were designed significantly changed eGFR values (p<0.05) and the proportion of young people per G stage compared to what was found with adequate use (MDRD-4. G1: 67.4% vs. 53.7%; G2: 32.6% vs. 45.3%; G3a: 0.0% vs. 1.0%. MDRD-4 IDMS. G1: 37.9% vs. 59.0%; G2: 56.8% vs. 40.0%; G3a: 5.3% vs. 1.0%. CKD-EPI. G1: 70.5% vs. 85.3%; G2: 29.5% vs. 14.7%). The use of numerical values for eGFR by MDRD-4 and MDRD-4 IDMS≥60mL/min/1.73 m² underestimated what was obtained with CKD-EPI, which can be reported numerically in that range. Both situations involve errors that affect patient renal functional categorization and prevalence in epidemiological studies.

Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar as consequências sobre a Taxa de Filtração Glomerular estimada (TFGe) por MDRD-4, MDRD-4 IDMS e CKD-EPI produzidas pela seleção inadequada das fórmulas, segundo a rastreabilidade da creatininemia utilizada e o efeito sobre a categorização por estágio G de TFG ao utilizar valores numéricos de MDRD-4 e MDRD-4 IDMS≥60 mL/min/1,73 m². Este é um estudo descritivo, analítico e de corte transversal com 100 alunos de bioquímica, que participaram em forma voluntária. Foi determinada a creatininemia através do métodos Jaffé cinéticos, valores rastreáveis e não rastreáveis ao Isotopic Dilution Mass Spectroscopy (IDMS). A TFGe foi estimada pela fórmula MDRD-4, MDRD-4 IDMS e CKD-EPI introduzindo em cada fórmula valores de creatinina rastreáveis e não rastreáveis a IDMS. Os estudantes foram classificados por categoria G conforme os resultados. Uso indevido das equações a respeito da rastreabilidade da creatinina conforme foram desenhadas, mudou sensivelmente os valores de TFGe (p<0,05) e a proporção de jovens por estágio G em relação ao encontrado com o uso adequado adecuado (MDRD-4. G1: 67,4% vs. 53,7%; G2: 32,6% vs. 45,3%; G3a: 0,0% vs. 1,0%. MDRD-4 IDMS. G1: 37,9% vs. 59,0%; G2: 56,8% vs. 40,0%; G3a: 5,3% vs. 1,0%. CKD-EPI. G1: 70,5% vs. 85,3%; G2: 29,5% vs. 14,7%). Utilizar valores numéricos para TFGe por MDRD-4 e MDRD-4 IDMS≥60mL/min/1,73 m² infraestimou o obtido com CKD-EPI, que pode informar-se numericamente nesse intervalo. Ambas as situações conduzem a erros que afetam a categorização funcional renal de pacientes e a prevalência em estudos epidemiológicos.

Height-independent estimation of glomerular filtration rate in children: an alternative to the Schwartz equation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance of 2 height-independent equations used to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), those of Pottel (eGFR-Pottel) and the British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH) (eGFR-BCCH), with the commonly used Schwartz equation (eGFR-Schwartz). STUDY DESIGN: We externally validated eGFR-Pottel and eGFR-BCCH in a well-characterized pediatric patient population (n = 152) and compared their diagnostic performance with that of eGFR-Schwartz using Bland-Altman analysis. All patients underwent glomerular filtration rate measurement using the gold standard single-injection inulin clearance method (GFR-inulin). RESULTS: Median GFR-inulin was 92.0 mL/min/1.73 m² (IQR, 76.1-107.4 mL/min/1.73 m²). Compared with GFR-inulin, the mean bias for eGFR-Schwartz was -10.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (95% limits of agreement [LOA], -77.5 to 57.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), compared with -12.3 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% LOA, -72.6 to 47.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) for eGFR-Pottel and -22.1 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% LOA, -105.0 to 60.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) for eGFR-BCCH. eGFR-Pottel showed comparable accuracy to eGFR-Schwartz, with 77% and 76% of estimates within 30% of GFR-inulin, respectively. eGFR-BCCH was less accurate than eGFR-Schwartz (66% of estimates within 30% of GFR-inulin; P < .01). CONCLUSION: The performance of eGFR-Pottel is superior to that of eGFR-BCCH and comparable with that of eGFR-Schwartz. eGFR-Pottel is a valid alternative to eGFR-Schwartz in children and could be reported by the laboratory if height data are not available.