Preemptive Impella 5.5 insertion to reduce operative risk in high-risk cardiac surgery: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Society of thoracic surgery (STS) risk score has been used as a tool to gauge operative risk of cardiac surgery patients. High-risk patients, with STS risk score > 8 %, are considered as having prohibitive risk and are not offered surgery. There is no established strategy to minimize postoperative hemodynamic instability using mechanical circulatory support (MCS), despite growing interest in utilizing MCS prior to hemodynamic instability. The Impella 5.5 can provide enough perfusion and unload the left ventricle. CASE PRESENTATION: We managed a 75-year-old male with multiple comorbidities and a presumed Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score higher than 9.8 %, who had redo coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic and mitral valve replacement with concomitant implantation of the Impella 5.5. Patient had a good recovery despite developing post-operative atrial fibrillation. DISCUSSION: Impella is used as a mechanical circulatory support device in patients with cardiogenic shock. It provides forward flow and effectively unloads the left ventricle. The concomitant placement of the Impella 5.5 in high-risk cardiac candidates may be associated with reduced operative risk. CONCLUSION: Placement of the device as part of surgical plan can potentially mitigate the perioperative risk by providing adequate endogean perfusion, decrease pressor support, unloading LV.

Cardiac power output ratio: Novel survival predictor after percutaneous ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock.

AIMS: Currently, there is limited data on prognostic indicators after insertion of percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) in the treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS). This study evaluated the prognostic role of cardiac power output (CPO) ratio, defined as CPO at 24 h divided by early CPO (30 min to 2 h), in CS patients after PVAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive CS patients from the QEH-PVAD Registry were followed up for survival at 90 days after PVAD. Among 121 consecutive patients, 98 underwent right heart catheterization after PVAD, with CPO ratio available in 68 patients. The CPO ratio and 24-h CPO, but not the early CPO post PVAD, were significantly associated with 90-day survival, with corresponding area under curve in ROC analysis of 0.816, 0.740, and 0.469, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only the CPO ratio and lactate level at 24 h remained as independent survival predictors. The CPO ratio was not associated with age, sex, and body size. Patients with lower CPO ratio had significantly lower coronary perfusion pressure, worse right heart indices, and higher pulmonary vascular resistance. A lower CPO ratio was also significantly associated with mechanical ventilation and higher creatine kinase levels in myocardial infarction patients. CONCLUSION: In post-PVAD patients, the CPO ratio outperformed the absolute CPO values and other haemodynamic metrics in predicting survival at 90 days. Such a proportional change of CPO over time, likely reflecting native heart function recovery, may help to guide management of CS patients post-PVAD.

Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of right ventricular failure: A state of the art review of mechanical support devices.

The function of the right ventricle (RV) is to drive the forward flow of blood to the pulmonary system for oxygenation before returning to the left ventricle. Due to the thin myocardium of the RV, its function is easily affected by decreased preload, contractile motion abnormalities, or increased afterload. While various etiologies can lead to changes in RV structure and function, sudden changes in RV afterload can cause acute RV failure which is associated with high mortality. Early detection and diagnosis of RV failure is imperative for guiding initial medical management. Echocardiographic findings of reduced tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (<1.7) and RV wall motion (RV S' <10 cm/s) are quantitatively supportive of RV systolic dysfunction. Medical management commonly involves utilizing diuretics or fluids to optimize RV preload, while correcting the underlying insult to RV function. When medical management alone is insufficient, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may be necessary. However, the utility of MCS for isolated RV failure remains poorly understood. This review outlines the differences in flow rates, effects on hemodynamics, and advantages/disadvantages of MCS devices such as intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, centrifugal-flow right ventricular assist devices, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and includes a detailed review of the latest clinical trials and studies analyzing the effects of MCS devices in acute RV failure.

Extracorporeal Life Support in Myocardial Infarction: New Highlights.

Background and Objectives: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a potentially severe complication following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in these patients has risen significantly over the past two decades, especially when conventional treatments fail. Our aim is to provide an overview of the role of VA-ECMO in CS complicating AMI, with the most recent literature highlights. Materials and Methods: We have reviewed the current VA-ECMO practices with a particular focus on CS complicating AMI. The largest studies reporting the most significant results, i.e., overall clinical outcomes and management of the weaning process, were identified in the PubMed database from 2019 to 2024. Results: The literature about the use of VA-ECMO in CS complicating AMI primarily has consisted of observational studies until 2019, generating the need for randomized controlled trials. The EURO-SHOCK trial showed a lower 30-day all-cause mortality rate in patients receiving VA-ECMO compared to those receiving standard therapy. The ECMO-CS trial compared immediate VA-ECMO implementation with early conservative therapy, with a similar mortality rate between the two groups. The ECLS-SHOCK trial, the largest randomized controlled trial in this field, found no significant difference in mortality at 30 days between the ECMO group and the control group. Recent studies suggest the potential benefits of combining left ventricular unloading devices with VA-ECMO, but they also highlight the increased complication rate, such as bleeding and vascular issues. The routine use of VA-ECMO in AMI complicated by CS cannot be universally supported due to limited evidence and associated risks. Ongoing trials like the Danger Shock, Anchor, and Recover IV trials aim to provide further insights into the management of AMI complicated by CS. Conclusions: Standardizing the timing and indications for initiating mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is crucial and should guide future trials. Multidisciplinary approaches tailored to individual patient needs are essential to minimize complications from unnecessary MCS device initiation.

In Patients with Cardiogenic Shock, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Is Associated with Very High All-Cause Inpatient Mortality Rate.

Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock excluding Impella and IABP use. Method: The large Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to study any association between the use of ECMO in adults over the age of 18 and mortality and complications with a diagnosis of cardiogenic shocks. Results: ICD-10 codes for ECMO and cardiogenic shock for the available years 2016-2020 were utilized. A total of 796,585 (age 66.5 ± 14.4) patients had a diagnosis of cardiogenic shock excluding Impella. Of these patients, 13,160 (age 53.7 ± 15.4) were treated with ECMO without IABP use. Total inpatient mortality without any device was 32.7%. It was 47.9% with ECMO. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for 47 variables such as age, gender, race, lactic acidosis, three-vessel intervention, left main myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, systolic heart failure, acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, chronic renal disease, etc., ECMO utilization remained highly associated with mortality (OR: 1.78, CI: 1.6-1.9, p < 0.001). Evaluating teaching hospitals only revealed similar findings. Major complications were also high in the ECMO cohort. Conclusions: In patients with cardiogenic shock, the use of ECMO was associated with the high in-hospital mortality regardless of comorbid condition, high-risk futures, or type of hospital.

Cardiovascular Collapse Requiring Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Lidocaine: A Case of Massive Bupropion Overdose.

Bupropion is an antidepressant used in the treatment of major depressive disorder, seasonal affective disorder, nicotine addiction, and weight loss. It primarily functions via norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibition. At toxic doses, bupropion can elicit seizures, as well as precipitate corrected QT interval (QTc) and QRS prolongation. We describe a case of an 18-year-old female who reportedly ingested 28 grams of extended-release bupropion, a dose much higher than in previously reported cases. Toxic ingestion precipitated status epilepticus, prolonged QTc, widened QRS, pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT), and subsequent cardiovascular collapse necessitating veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and Impella support. Historically, the cardiotoxic effects of bupropion toxicity have largely been treated with supportive care, sometimes requiring ECMO. This patient's course was complicated by a widening QRS despite aggressive bicarbonate therapy and recurrent pVT, which was ultimately aborted with lidocaine. Neurological prognostication was further complicated by a lack of brainstem reflexes on the exam. With maximal supportive care, the patient was liberated from Impella, ECMO, and the ventilator by hospital day seven. At discharge, she was neurologically intact with full recovery of cardiac function. This case emphasizes the need for early consideration of transfer to an ECMO center in the setting of a bupropion overdose and offers a potentially effective treatment option for bupropion-induced ventricular arrhythmia.

Automated control of Impella maintains optimal left ventricular unloading during periods of unstable hemodynamics and prevents myocardial damage in acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) unloading by Impella, an intravascular microaxial pump, has been shown to exert dramatic cardioprotective effects in acute clinical settings of cardiovascular diseases. Total Impella support (no native LV ejection) is far more efficient in reducing LV energetic demand than partial Impella support, but the manual control of pump speed to maintain stable LV unloading is difficult and impractical. We aimed to develop an Automatic IMpella Optimal Unloading System (AIMOUS), which controls Impella pump speed to maintain LV unloading degree using closed-feedback control. We validated the AIMOUS performance in an animal model. METHODS: In dogs, we identified the transfer function from pump speed to LV systolic pressure (LVSP) under total support conditions (n = 5). Using the transfer function, we designed the feedback controller of AIMOUS to keep LVSP at 40 mmHg and examined its performance by volume perturbations (n = 9). Lastly, AIMOUS was applied in the acute phase of ischemia-reperfusion in dogs. Four weeks after ischemia-reperfusion, we assessed LV function and infarct size (n = 10). RESULTS: AIMOUS maintained constant LVSP, thereby ensuring a stable LV unloading condition regardless of volume withdrawal or infusion (±8 ml/kg from baseline). AIMOUS in the acute phase of ischemia-reperfusion markedly improved LV function and reduced infarct size (No Impella support: 13.9 ± 1.3 vs. AIMOUS: 5.7 ± 1.9%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AIMOUS is capable of maintaining optimal LV unloading during periods of unstable hemodynamics. Automated control of Impella pump speed in the acute phase of ischemia-reperfusion significantly reduced infarct size and prevented subsequent worsening of LV function.

Clinical outcomes among cardiogenic shock patients supported with high-capacity Impella axial flow pumps: A report from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group.

BACKGROUND: The Impella 5.0 and 5.5 pumps (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) are large-bore transvalvular micro-axial assist devices used in cardiogenic shock (CS) for patients requiring high-capacity flow. Despite their increasing use, real-world data regarding indications, rates of utilization and clinical outcomes with this therapy are limited. The objective of our study was to examine clinical profiles and outcomes of patients in a contemporary, real-world CS registry of patients who received an Impella 5.0/5.5 alone or in combination with other temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. METHODS: The CS Working Group (CSWG) Registry includes patients from 34 US hospitals. For this analysis, data from patients who received an Impella 5.0/5.5 between 2020-2023 were analyzed. Use of Impella 5.0/5.5 with or without additional tMCS therapies, duration of support, adverse events and outcomes at hospital discharge were studied. Adverse events including stroke, limb ischemia, bleeding and hemolysis were not standardized by the registry but reported per individual CSWG Primary Investigator discretion. For those who survived, rates of native heart recovery (NHR) or heart replacement therapy (HRT) including heart transplant (HT), or durable ventricular assist device (VAD) were recorded. We also assessed outcomes based on shock etiology (acute myocardial infarction or MI-CS vs. heart failure-related CS or HF-CS). RESULTS: Among 6,205 patients, 754 received an Impella 5.0/5.5 (12.1%), including 210 MI-CS (27.8%) and 484 HF-CS (64.1%) patients. Impella 5.0/5.5 was used as the sole tMCS device in 32% of patients, while 68% of patients received a combination of tMCS devices. Impella cannulation sites were available for 524/754 (69.4%) of patients, with 93.5% axillary configuration. Survival to hospital discharge for those supported with an Impella 5.0/5.5 was 67%, with 20.4% NHR and 45.5% HRT. Compared to HF-CS, patients with MI-CS supported on Impella 5.0/5.5 had higher in-hospital mortality (45.2% vs 26.2%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to receive HRT (22.4% vs 56.6%, p < 0.001. For patients receiving a combination of tMCS during hospitalization, this was associated with higher rates of limb ischemia (9% vs. 3%, p < 0.01), bleeding (52% vs 33%, p < 0.01), and mortality (38% vs 25%; p < 0.001) compared to Impella 5.0/5.5 alone. Among Impella 5.0/5.5 recipients, the median duration of pump support was 12.9 days (IQR: 6.8-22.9) and longer in patients bridged to HRT (14 days; IQR: 7.7-28.4). CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-center cohort of patients with CS, use of Impella 5.0/5.5 was associated with an overall survival of 67.1% and high rates of HRT. Lower adverse event rates were observed when Impella 5.0/5.5 was the sole support device used. Further study is required to determine whether a strategy of early Impella 5.0/5.5 use for CS improves survival. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: High capacity Impella heart pumps are capable of provide up to 5.5 liter/min of flow while upper body surgical placement allows for ambulation. Patients with advanced cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction or heart failure requiring temporary mechanical circulatory support may benefit from upfront use of Impella 5.5 to improve overall survival, including native heart recovery or successful bridge to durable left ventricular assist device surgery or heart transplantation.

Left ventricular unloading therapy using Impella 5.5 after emergency surgery for acute myocardial infarction mechanical complication: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), surgery for left ventricular free wall rupture (LVFWR) and ventricular septal rupture (VSR) has a high in-hospital mortality rate, which has not improved significantly over time. Unloading the LV is critical to preventing excessive stress on the repair site and avoiding problems such as bleeding, leaks, patch dehiscence, and recurrence of LVFWR and VSR because the tissue is so fragile. We present two cases of patients who used Impella 5.5 for LV unloading following emergency surgery for AMI mechanical complications. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old male STEMI patient underwent fibrinolysis of the distal right coronary artery. Three days later, he passed out and went into shock. Echocardiography revealed a cardiac tamponade. We found an oozing-type LVFWR on the posterolateral wall and treated it with a non-suture technique using TachoSil. Before the patient was taken off CPB, Impella 5.5 was inserted into the LV via a 10 mm synthetic graft connected to the right axillary artery. We kept the flow rate above 4.0 to 4.5 L/min until POD 3 to reduce LV wall tension while minimizing pulsatility. On POD 6, we weaned the patient from Impella 5.5. A postoperative cardiac CT scan showed no contrast leakage from the LV. However, a cerebral hemorrhage on POD 4 during heparin administration complicated his hospitalization. Case 2: A diagnosis of cardiogenic shock caused by STEMI occurred in an 84-year-old male patient, who underwent PCI of the LAD with IABP support. Three days after PCI, echocardiography revealed VSR, and the patient underwent emergency VSR repair with two separate patches and BioGlue applied to the suture line between them. Before weaning from CPB, we implanted Impella 5.5 in the LV and added venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support for right heart failure. The postoperative echocardiography revealed no residual shunt. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing emergency surgery for mechanical complications of AMI may find Impella 5.5 to be an effective tool for LV unloading. The use of VA-ECMO in conjunction with Impella may be an effective strategy for managing VSR associated with concurrent right-sided heart failure.

An explainable machine learning approach using contemporary UNOS data to identify patients who fail to bridge to heart transplantation.

Background: The use of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) and Impella devices as a bridge to heart transplantation (HTx) has increased significantly in recent times. This study aimed to create and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model that can predict the failure of status two listings and identify the clinical features that significantly impact this outcome. Methods: We used the UNOS registry database to identify HTx candidates listed as UNOS Status 2 between 2018 and 2022 and supported with either Impella (5.0 or 5.5) or IABP. We used the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm to build and validate ML models. We developed two models: (1) a comprehensive model that included all patients in our cohort and (2) separate models designed for each of the 11 UNOS regions. Results: We analyzed data from 4,178 patients listed as Status 2. Out of them, 12% had primary outcomes indicating Status 2 failure. Our ML models were based on 19 variables from the UNOS data. The comprehensive model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 (±0.03), with a range between 0.44 (±0.08) and 0.74 (±0.01) across different regions. The models' specificity ranged from 0.75 to 0.96. The top five most important predictors were the number of inotropes, creatinine, sodium, BMI, and blood group. Conclusion: Using ML is clinically valuable for highlighting patients at risk, enabling healthcare providers to offer intensified monitoring, optimization, and care escalation selectively.

Lower extremity artery thromboembolism during removal of Impella after repair for ventricular septal rupture: A case report.

Although the anticoagulant complications of Impella are well known, the timing of heparin administration when using Impella immediately after open heart surgery has not been established. We report a case of a 59-year-old man with Impella-assisted repair of a ventricular septal perforation after acute myocardial infarction who developed thromboembolism of the lower extremity arteries after removal of Impella.

Usefulness of bicarbonate-based Impella purge solution in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: the first case report of long-term management in Japan.

Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support utilizing micro-axial flow pumps, such as the Impella group of devices, has become a life-saving technique in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock, with ever-increasing success rates. A 30-year-old man presented with acute decompensated heart failure and a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (17%). Despite initial treatment with inotropic drugs and intra-aortic balloon pump support, his hemodynamic status remained unstable. Transition to Impella CP mechanical circulatory support was made on day 6 owing to persistently low systolic blood pressure. A significant decline in platelet count prompted suspicion of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), later confirmed by positive platelet-activated anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibody and a 4Ts score of 6 points. Argatroban was initially used as the purge solution, but owing to complications, a switch to Impella 5.0 and a bicarbonate-based purge solution (BBPS) was performed. Despite additional veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support on day 24, the patient, aiming for ventricular assist device treatment and heart transplantation, died from infection and multiple organ failure. Remarkably, the Impella CP continued functioning normally until the patient's demise, indicating stable Impella pump performance using BBPS. This case highlights the usefulness of BBPS as an alternative to conventional Impella heparin purge solution when HIT occurs.

Hemodynamics with mechanical circulatory support devices using a cardiogenic shock model.

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, including veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and Impella, have been widely used for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). However, hemodynamics with each device and combination therapy is not thoroughly understood. We aimed to elucidate the hemodynamics with MCS using a pulsatile flow model. Hemodynamics with Impella CP, VA-ECMO, and a combination of Impella CP and VA-ECMO were assessed based on the pressure and flow under support with each device and the pressure-volume loop of the ventricle model. The Impella CP device with CS status resulted in an increase in aortic pressure and a decrease in end-diastolic volume and end-diastolic pressure (EDP). VA-ECMO support resulted in increased afterload, leading to a significant increase in aortic pressure with an increase in end-systolic volume and EDP and decreasing venous reservoir pressure. The combination of Impella CP and VA-ECMO led to left ventricular unloading, regardless of increase in afterload. Hemodynamic support with Impella and VA-ECMO should be a promising combination for patients with severe CS.

Left ventricular unloading via percutaneous assist device during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest.

INTRODUCTION: A feared complication of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is cardiac arrest (CA). Even if return of spontaneous circulation is achieved, cardiogenic shock (CS) is common. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) supports patients with CS and is often used in conjunction with an Impella device (2.5 and CP) to off-load the left ventricle, although limited evidence supports this approach. METHODS: The goal of this study was to determine whether a mortality difference was observed in VA-ECMO alone versus VA-ECMO with Impella (ECPELLA) in patients with CS from AMI and CA. A retrospective chart review of 50 patients with AMI-CS and CA and were supported with VA-ECMO (n = 34) or ECPELLA (n = 16) was performed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 6-months from VA-ECMO or Impella implantation. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and complication rates between both cohorts and intensive care unit data. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar, except patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were more likely to be in the VA-ECMO group (p = 0.044). The ECPELLA cohort had significantly worse survival after VA-ECMO (SAVE) score (p = 0.032). Six-month all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the cohorts, even when adjusting for SAVE score. Secondary outcomes were notable for an increased rate of minor complications without an increased rate of major complications in the ECPELLA group. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized trials are needed to determine if a mortality difference exists between VA-ECMO and ECPELLA platforms in patients with AMI complicated by CA and CS.

Impella Versus Non-Impella for Nonemergent High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The benefit of mechanical circulatory support with Impella (Abiomed, Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts) for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) is uncertain. PROTECT III registry data showed improved outcomes with Impella compared with historical data (PROTECT II) but lacks a direct comparison with the HR-PCI cohort without Impella support. We retrospectively identified patients meeting the PROTECT III inclusion criteria for HR-PCI and compared this group (non-Impella cohort [NonIMP]) with the outcomes data from the PROTECT III registry (Impella cohort). Baseline differences were balanced using inverse propensity weighting. The coprimary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in-hospital and at 90 days. A total of 283 patients at great risk did not receive Impella support; 200 patients had 90-days event ascertainment and were included in the inverse propensity weighting analysis and compared with 504 patients in the Impella cohort group. After calibration, few residual differences remained between groups. The primary outcome was not different in-hospital (3.0% vs 4.8%, p = 0.403) but less in NonIMP at 90 days (7.5% vs 13.8%, p = 0.033). Periprocedural vascular complications, bleeding, and transfusion rate did not differ between groups; however, acute kidney injury occurred more frequently in the NonIMP group (10.5% vs 5.4%, p = 0.023). In conclusion, under identical HR-PCI inclusion criteria for Impella use in PROTECT III, an institutional non-Impella-supported HR-PCI cohort showed similar MACE in-hospital but fewer MACE at 90 days, whereas there was no signal for periprocedural harm with Impella use. These results do not support routine usage of Impella for patients with HR-PCI.

Investigations of Differential Hypoxemia During Venoarterial Membrane Oxygenation with and Without Impella Support.

PURPOSE: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is used in patients with refractory cardiac or cardio-pulmonary failure. Native ventricular output interacts with VA ECMO flow and may hinder sufficient oxygenation to the heart and the brain. Further on, VA ECMO leads to afterload increase requiring ventricular unloading. The aim of the study was to investigate aortic blood flow and oxygenation for various ECMO settings and cannula positions with a numerical model. METHODS: Four different aortic cannula tip positions (ascending aorta, descending aorta, abdominal aorta, and iliac artery) were included in a model of a human aorta. Three degrees of cardiac dysfunction and VA ECMO support (50%, 75% and 90%) with a total blood flow of 6 l/min were investigated. Additionally, the Impella CP device was implemented under 50% support condition. Blood oxygen saturation at the aortic branches and the pressure acting on the aortic valve were calculated. RESULTS: A more proximal tip orientation is necessary to increase oxygen supply to the supra-aortic and coronary arteries for 50% and 75% support. During the 90% support scenario, proper oxygenation can be achieved independently of tip position. The use of Impella reduces afterload by 8-17 mmHg and vessel oxygenation is similar to 50% VA ECMO support. Pressure load on the aortic valve increases with more proximal tip position and is decreased during Impella use. CONCLUSIONS: We present a simulation model for the investigation of hemodynamics and blood oxygenation with various mechanical circulatory support systems. Our results underline the intricate and patient-specific relationship between extracorporeal support, cannula tip orientation and oxygenation capacity.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS)-Guided Management of Cardiogenic Shock in COVID-19 Fulminant Myocarditis With Combined Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Impella (ECPELLA): A Case Report.

The COVID-19 pandemic, which has been raging globally, has been reported to cause not only pneumonia but also various cardiovascular diseases. In particular, myocarditis poses a serious risk if it becomes severe. As a characteristic of myocardial damage in this disease, right ventricular dysfunction is frequently reported, and biventricular failure is not uncommon. In cases where cardiogenic shock occurs, ECPELLA, which combines veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella, is used for management. Currently, in Japan, ECPELLA is the central treatment for severe biventricular failure in the acute phase. However, its management method has not been established. Weaning from ECPELLA requires the following three conditions: (1) improvement of left ventricular function; (2) improvement of right ventricular function; and (3) optimization of circulating plasma volume. However, since these conditions change moment by moment, frequent and detailed assessments are necessary. Nevertheless, considering the need for isolation due to COVID-19, there are limitations on the tests that can be performed. In this regard, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) allows repeated bedside evaluations while maintaining infection protection. We report that in the case of severe COVID-19-related myocarditis, the use of POCUS enabled the preservation of cardiac function and appropriate timing for weaning from ECPELLA.

Optimizing Perioperative Care for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in High-Risk Patients Supported by Impella 5.5.

Impella 5.5 (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) is a surgically implanted mechanical circulatory support device that helps support hemodynamically compromised patients. The device's risks and benefits must be entirely known, especially in the electrophysiology lab. Due to unexpected hemodynamic changes during pace mapping and ablation, such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) and asystole, it is sometimes necessary to implement chemical support with inotropic agents such as epinephrine or mechanical support with devices such as an Impella. We present the case of a 72-year-old male with a biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) placed for refractory VT presenting for VT ablation. He had ischemic cardiomyopathy with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 33% and medical history of cardiac sarcoidosis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, pulmonary embolism, left bundle branch block, and coronary artery disease. Due to the nature of the procedure and his history of arrhythmia, the patient was deemed a candidate for Impella 5.5. After evaluating patient risk factors, the cardiothoracic anesthesia team developed a strategic approach with imaging (including radiographic and echocardiographic imaging), Impella monitoring, and pharmacologic management with inotropes and vasopressors, allowing for uncomplicated perioperative management during the ablation. Given the procedure's intricacies and the patient's arrhythmia history, the medical team identified the patient as suitable for Impella 5.5 due to better performance and greater cardiac output than Impella 2.5 (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA, USA). Following a thorough assessment of the patient's risk factors, the cardiothoracic anesthesia team devised a comprehensive strategy to facilitate smooth perioperative management during the ablation, minimizing complications. The VT ablation procedure was performed successfully and effectively terminated the arrhythmia. However, the patient developed multifaceted postoperative complications, including cardiogenic shock, hemorrhagic shock, dyspnea, anemia, gastrointestinal abnormalities, and sepsis.  This case represents a highly complex patient scenario under the care of the cardiovascular anesthesiologist due to the nature of the procedure and numerous cardiovascular comorbidities, low ejection fraction, ICD placement, and malignant ventricular arrhythmia. We discuss the various perioperative management strategies and how they are tailored to such patients, including pharmacologic intervention, anesthesia administration, imaging modalities, and postoperative care. The purpose of this case report is to delineate the role of Impella 5.5 in perioperative care for high-risk VT ablation patients. We discuss the progression, pathophysiology, and management of this patient's multisystem complications following the procedure. We also highlight the use of Impella 5.5 in the electrophysiology lab and the anesthesia considerations, safeguards, and management strategies to optimize perioperative outcomes and avoid complications.

The Self-Expandable Impella CP (ECP) as a Mechanical Resuscitation Device.

The survival rate of cardiac arrest (CA) can be improved by utilizing percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVADs) instead of conventional chest compressions. However, existing pLVADs require complex fluoroscopy-guided placement along a guidewire and suffer from limited blood flow due to their cross-sectional area. The recently developed self-expandable Impella CP (ECP) pLVAD addresses these limitations by enabling guidewire-free placement and increasing the pump cross-sectional area. This study evaluates the feasibility of resuscitation using the Impella ECP in a swine CA model. Eleven anesthetized pigs (73.8 ± 1.7 kg) underwent electrically induced CA, were left untreated for 5 min and then received pLVAD insertion and activation. Vasopressors were administered and defibrillations were attempted. Five hours after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), the pLVAD was removed, and animals were monitored for an additional hour. Hemodynamics were assessed and myocardial function was evaluated using echocardiography. Successful guidewire-free pLVAD placement was achieved in all animals. Resuscitation was successful in 75% of cases, with 3.5 ± 2.0 defibrillations and 1.8 ± 0.4 mg norepinephrine used per ROSC. Hemodynamics remained stable post-device removal, with no adverse effects or aortic valve damage observed. The Impella ECP facilitated rapid guidewire-free pLVAD placement in fibrillating hearts, enabling successful resuscitation. These findings support a broader clinical adoption of pLVADs, particularly the Impella ECP, for CA.