Denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of comparative safety in randomized controlled trials.

Denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis are generally well-tolerated, but their comparative safety remains unclear. We aimed to explore the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis. Databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials published in English (as of December 2023). Trials comparing adverse events (AE) between denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with primary osteoporosis were investigated. Data were pooled using a fixed- or random-effects model to determine the risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various AEs in patients treated with denosumab in comparison to patients treated with bisphosphonates. Eleven trials (5,545 patients; follow-up period: 12-24 months) were included in this meta-analysis. All trials had a risk of bias (e.g., reporting bias linked to secondary endpoints and selection bias linked to random allocation). In comparison to bisphosphonates, denosumab was significantly associated with less withdrawal due to AEs (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34-0.71), more five-point major adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 2.05; 95% CI 1.03-4.09), more cardiovascular AEs (RR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.07-2.41), more infections (RR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.27), more upper respiratory tract infections (RR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.08-2.25), less vertebral fractures (RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.93), and less abdominal pain (RR = 0.44;95% CI 0.22-0.87). We explored the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis, some of which could be attributed to their beneficial effects. However, all trials had a risk of bias. Further investigations are required to confirm our results.

[Determination of multiple residual solvents in ibandronate sodium using headspace-gas chromatography].

Ibandronate sodium, a third-generation diphosphate drug used worldwide to treat osteoporosis, has the advantages of convenient use, low toxicity, and significant therapeutic effects. However, the residual organic solvents in the synthesis process of sodium ibandronate not only have a negative impact on the efficacy of the drug, but also lead to a decrease in drug stability. Moreover, if the residual amounts of these solvents exceed safety standards, they may pose serious threats to human health. This study successfully established a convenient and efficient method based on headspace-gas chromatography (HS-GC) for the simultaneous determination of five residual solvents (methanol, acetone, benzene, toluene, 1-pentanol) in the raw materials of ibandronate sodium. The results indicated that satisfactory analytical performance can be achieved by using DB-624 capillary column (30 m×0.32 mm×1.8 µm) and a flame ionization detector in conjunction with headspace autosampling and a temperature program. The specific operating conditions included an initial temperature of 40 ℃, with a hold of 2 min, followed by a temperature ramp first to 200 ℃ at a rate of 5 ℃/min and then to 240 ℃ at a rate of 20 ℃/min, with a hold of 5 min. Nitrogen with a flow rate of 1 mL/min and split ratio of 14∶1 was used as the carrier gas. The headspace vial temperature was maintained at 80 ℃, and the sample equilibration time was 20 min. Under the established analytical conditions, good linear relationships were obtained between the mass concentrations of methanol (72-216 µg/mL), acetone (120-360 µg/mL), benzene (0.048-0.144 µg/mL), toluene (21.36-64.08 µg/mL), and 1-pentanol (120-360 µg/mL) and their corresponding peak areas, with correlation coefficients (r) greater than 0.990. The limits of detection for these solvents were 2.88, 0.011, 0.90, 0.24, and 0.024 ng/mL, respectively, with limits of quantification of 11.5, 0.043, 3.6, 0.96, and 0.096 ng/mL, respectively. Furthermore, the recoveries of these solvents ranged from 86.3% to 101.9%, with relative standard deviations (RSDs, n=3) of less than 2.49%. The proposed method is simple, accurate, reliable, and suitable for the rapid and simultaneous determination of five residual solvents in the raw materials of ibandronate sodium. This study has important practical significance in improving drug safety and ensuring public health.

Bisphosphonate alternative regimens for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures: BLAST-OFF, a mixed-methods study.

Background: Bisphosphonates are a class of medication commonly used to treat osteoporosis. Alendronate is recommended as the first-line treatment; however, long-term adherence (both treatment compliance and persistence) is poor. Alternative bisphosphonates are available, which can be given intravenously and have been shown to improve long-term adherence. However, the most clinically effective and cost-effective alternative bisphosphonate regimen remains unclear. What is the most cost-effective bisphosphonate in clinical trials may not be the most cost-effective or acceptable to patients in everyday clinical practice. Objectives: 1. Explore patient, clinician and stakeholder views, experiences and preferences of alendronate compared to alternative bisphosphonates. 2. Update and refine the 2016 systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis of bisphosphonates, and estimate the value of further research into their benefits. 3. Undertake stakeholder/consensus engagement to identify important research questions and further rank research priorities. Methods: The study was conducted in two stages, stages 1A and 1B in parallel, followed by stage 2: • Stage 1A - we elicited patient and healthcare experiences to understand their preferences of bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis. This was undertaken by performing a systematic review and framework synthesis of qualitative studies, followed by semistructured qualitative interviews with participants. • Stage 1B - we updated and expanded the existing Health Technology Assessment systematic review and clinical and cost-effectiveness model, incorporating a more comprehensive review of treatment efficacy, safety, side effects, compliance and long-term persistence. • Stage 2 - we identified and ranked further research questions that need to be answered about the effectiveness and acceptability of bisphosphonates. Results: Patients and healthcare professionals identified a number of challenges in adhering to bisphosphonate medication, balancing the potential for long-term risk reduction against the work involved in adhering to oral alendronate. Intravenous zoledronate treatment was generally more acceptable, with such regimens perceived to be more straightforward to engage in, although a portion of patients taking alendronate were satisfied with their current treatment. Intravenous zoledronate was found to be the most effective, with higher adherence rates compared to the other bisphosphonates, for reducing the risk of fragility fracture. However, oral bisphosphonates are more cost-effective than intravenous zoledronate due to the high cost of zoledronate administration in hospital. The importance of including patients and healthcare professionals when setting research priorities is recognised. Important areas for research were related to patient factors influencing treatment selection and effectiveness, how to optimise long-term care and the cost-effectiveness of delivering zoledronate in an alternative, non-hospital setting. Conclusions: Intravenous zoledronate treatment was generally more acceptable to patients and found to be the most effective bisphosphonate and with greater adherence; however, the cost-effectiveness relative to oral alendronate is limited by its higher zoledronate hospital administration costs. Future work: Further research is needed to support people to make decisions influencing treatment selection, effectiveness and optimal long-term care, together with the clinical and cost-effectiveness of intravenous zoledronate administered in a non-hospital (community) setting. Limitations: Lack of clarity and limitations in the many studies included in the systematic review may have under-interpreted some of the findings relating to effects of bisphosphonates. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN10491361. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR127550) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 21. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Bisphosphonates are drug treatments commonly used to treat osteoporosis. Alendronate is the most used and is taken by mouth, weekly at a specific time of the week, which can be challenging. Less than one in four people continue this treatment beyond 2 years. Alternative bisphosphonates are available, which vary in frequency and how they are administered. The most acceptable and best value-for-money regimen is unclear. Our aim was to determine how effective alternative bisphosphonates are compared to alendronate at preventing fractures and whether reduction in fracture risk was achieved at a reasonable financial cost, but acceptable to patients. The study was conducted in two stages, stages 1A and 1B in parallel, followed by stage 2: Stage 1A: a review of the published evidence on patients' and doctors' views, experiences and preferences regarding different bisphosphonate treatment regimens, followed by interviews with patients and healthcare professionals. Stage 1B: an update of an existing study on how effective bisphosphonates are in preventing fragility fractures caused by osteoporosis and whether they are good value for money. Stage 2: identification of questions that need to be answered about the effectiveness and acceptability of bisphosphonate treatments. Taking bisphosphonate medication often involves quite a lot of effort by patients, particularly when taking alendronate tablets. A yearly infusion of zoledronate treatment was more acceptable, easier to engage with and the most effective treatment compared to alendronate. However, the cost of administering zoledronate in hospital made alendronate better value for money. Bisphosphonates are effective in reducing the risk of fracture, but 'continuing with treatment', particularly alendronate tablets, remains a challenge. A yearly infusion of zoledronate offers an acceptable and effective treatment, but further research is needed to support patients and healthcare professionals in making decisions about the various treatments, benefits and cost savings of administering zoledronate outside of hospital and in the community.

Investigate the Therapeutic Effect of Ibandronate Sodium on Knee Osteoarthritis Based on TLRs/MyD88/NF-κB Signaling Pathway in Vitro and in Vivo.

BACKGROUND: For decades, bisphosphonates have primarily found application in clinical practice for the treatment and prevention of bone metastases associated with malignant tumors and various bone metabolic disorders. However, third-generation bisphosphonates like ibandronate have demonstrated significant utility in addressing conditions like osteoporosis (OA) and other bone metabolism-related ailments. Ibandronate, distinguished by its high effectiveness, low toxicity, and ease of administration, has garnered attention for its potential applications in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, OA, and orthopedic concerns. In recent years, the utilization of ibandronate sodium in these contexts has sparked considerable interest. Research has pointed to a possible connection between ibandronate and the Toll-like receptors (TLRs), myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway, particularly in the context of inflammation and immunological regulation. Consequently, this study is designed to investigate the therapeutic impact of ibandronate on in vitro and in vivo models of knee osteoarthritis, while also delving into its influence on the TLRs/MyD88/NF-κB pathway. METHOD: Various dosages of ibandronate sodium, including low (10 g/kg), medium (20 g/kg), and high (30 g/kg), were administered following the establishment of both in vivo and in vitro models of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Post-intervention, an in-depth quantitative analysis of bone tissue microstructure was conducted. The morphology of articular cartilage tissue was observed in vivo, and the modified Mankin score was subsequently calculated. In the in vitro setting, cartilage was entirely isolated, and mRNA and total protein were extracted to measure the expression levels of TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB at both the mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, the study explored the effects of Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß) on cell proliferation, apoptosis, stromal decomposition enzyme activity, ossification, and the expression of TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB. RESULT: In the results of the in vivo experiments, several noteworthy findings emerged. The knee curvature, gait score, Mankin score, pathological knee joint injury degree, cartilage protein loss, and trabecular separation within the model group exhibited significant elevations compared to both the sham operation group and the blank control group (p < 0.05). Conversely, bone density, bone volume fraction, and trabecular thickness in the model group displayed lower values in comparison to the sham operation and blank control groups (p < 0.05). Following the administration of ibandronate sodium, there was a progressive improvement in these parameters, with the medium and high-dose groups demonstrating the most favorable outcomes (p < 0.05). Additionally, the model group exhibited the highest expression levels of TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB, while the ibandronate sodium intervention group displayed reduced expression levels of these markers, with the high-dose group registering the most significant changes (p < 0.05). Turning to the in vitro experiments, it was observed that the cell proliferation capacity and ossification degree of the IL-1ß-induced group experienced declines, concomitant with an increase in stromal decomposition enzyme activity and cell apoptosis rate (p < 0.05). However, post-intervention with ibandronate sodium, all these indicators gradually returned to normal, with the medium-dose group exhibiting the most notable improvements. The expression levels of TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB in the IL-1ß-induced group showed an increase, while the expression levels in the ibandronate sodium intervention group displayed a decrease, particularly in the high-dose group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ibandronate sodium demonstrates a protective effect on articular chondrocytes and exhibits the potential to decelerate the pathological progression of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in rats. This mechanism is likely achieved through the inhibition of the TLRs/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway.

Adjuvant capecitabine versus nihil in older patients with node-positive/high-risk node-negative early breast cancer receiving ibandronate - The ICE randomized clinical trial.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Evaluation of the impact of a de-escaleted chemotherapy regimen consisting of capecitabine (Cap) on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in patients ≥65 years with node-positive/high-risk node-negative early breast cancer (BC) receiving ibandronate (Ib). METHODS: ICE (Ib with or without Cap in Elderly patients with early breast cancer) was a multicentre phase 3 clinical trial with a 2020 update of long-term follow-up for overall survival enroling node-positive/high-risk node-negative patients ≥65 years with early BC. Patients were randomised to Cap 2000 mg/m² day 1-14 q3w for 6 cycles plus Ib (50 mg p.o. daily or alternatively 6 mg intravenous q4w) or Ib alone for 2 years. Endocrine therapy was recommended for hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients. The primary endpoint was iDFS analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression and log-rank analysis. RESULTS: 1358 (96.4%) of 1409 randomised patients started treatment. 564 (83.4%) completed 6 cycles of Cap. 513 (77.7%) and 516 (78.8%) completed Ib in the Cap+Ib and Ib alone arm, respectively. Median age was 71 (range 64-88) years, 1099 (81%) were HR-positive, 705 (51.9%) node-negative. At a median follow-up of 61.3 months, 5-year iDFS was 78.8% for Cap+Ib versus 75.0% for Ib alone (p = 0.80). Effects were independent of age, nodal, and HR status. The addition of Cap caused significantly higher skin and gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The adjuvant combination of Cap+Ib did not show significantly better iDFS than Ib alone in node-positive/high-risk node-negative older BC patients, of whom HR-positive patients were also treated with endocrine therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study in elderly patients with early breast cancer (ICE), NCT00196859, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00196859?term=NCT00196859.

Evaluation of osseointegration of Ti-6Al-4V alloy orthodontic mini-screws with ibandronate-loaded TiO2 nanotube layer.

Recently, the use of orthodontic mini-screws as an anchorage for orthodontic treatment is increasing, and the degree of osseointegration of the mini-screws affects the performance of orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility and osseointegration of Titanium 6Aluminum 4Vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy orthodontic mini-screws with an ibandronate-loaded TiO2 nanotube (TNT) layer. The TNT layer was formed on the surface of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy orthodontic mini-screws and loaded with ibandronate. The TNT formed by anodic oxidation formed a completely self-organized and compact structure and was stably released for 7 days after loading with ibandronate. Mini-screws loaded with ibandronate were implanted into both tibias of rats, confirming rapid initial bone regeneration. We demonstrate that the release of stable ibandronate from the TNT layer of Ti-6Al-4V alloy orthodontic mini-screws can effectively improve biocompatibility and osseointegration.

Bone health in breast cancer.

Early breast cancer is among the most common cancers worldwide. Recent advances continue to improve outcomes and increase long-term survivorship. However, therapeutic modalities are deleterious for patients' bone health. While antiresorptive therapy may partially negate this, consequent reduction in rates of fragility fractures remains unproven. Selective prescription of bisphosphonates or denosumab may be an amicable middle ground. Recent evidence also suggests a possible role of osteoclast inhibitors as adjuvant therapy, but the evidence is modest at best. In this narrative clinical review, we explore the impact of various adjuvant modalities on bone mineral density and fragility fracture rates of early breast cancer survivors. We also review optimal patient selection for antiresorptive agents, their impact on rates of fragility fractures, and the possible role of these agents as adjuvant therapy.

Radiolabeling, Quality Control, and Cell Binding Studies of New 99mTc-Labeled Bisphosphonates: 99mTc-Ibandronate Sodium.

Objectives: Early detection of bone cancer is critical for treating symptoms, minimizing pain, and increasing overall quality of life. It is critical to develop novel radiopharmaceuticals with high labeling efficiency and stability for the diagnosis of bone cancer. This research aims to design a novel radiopharmaceutical that may be used to diagnose bone cancer. Materials and Methods: In this study, ibandronate sodium (IBD), a bisphosphonate analog, was radiolabeled with technetium-99m [99mTc] and quality control tests on the newly developed radiopharmaceutical ([99mTc]Tc-IBD) were performed using radioactive thin layer chromatography. After that, the incorporation of [99mTc]Tc-IBD into hydroxyapatite (HA) crystals and a human bone osteosarcoma cell line (U2OS) was tested. Results: According to the results obtained, optimal radiolabeling procedure was obtained for [99mTc]Tc-IBD with 200 µg.mL-1 IBD, 20 µg stannous chloride, and 99mTc with 37 MBq radioactivity. The reaction mixture was adjusted to pH 5.5 and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The radiochemical purity of [99mTc]Tc-IBD was found to be greater than 95% at room temperature for up to 6 h. Additionally, chromatography analysis showed >95% [99mTc]Tc-IBD complex formation with promising stability for up to 24 h in saline and up to 2 h in cell medium. The percentage binding of IBD to HA was 83.70 ± 3.67 and the logP of [99mTc]Tc-IBD was -1.1014. The radiolabeled complex exhibited a higher rate of cell incorporation to U2OS cells compared to Reduced/Hydrolyzed 99mTcO4 -. Conclusion: The newly produced radiopharmaceutical is very promising according to the results of in vitro cell culture, HA binding, and quality studies, and will be a step forward for further studies in nuclear medicine for bone cancer diagnostics.

Lutetium177-Labeled DOTA-Ibandronate: A Novel Radiopharmaceutical for Targeted Treatment of Bone Metastases.

Bone metastases of malignant tumors significantly threaten the patient survival and quality of life. We designed and synthesized a novel bisphosphonate radiopharmaceutical [68Ga- or 177Lu-labeled DOTA-Ibandronate(68Ga/177Lu-DOTA-IBA)] for targeted diagnosis and treatment of bone metastases. This study explored the basic biological characteristics of 177Lu-DOTA-IBA, guiding clinical translation and providing evidence for future clinical applications. The control variable method was used to optimize the optimal labeling conditions. The in vitro properties, biological distribution, and toxicity of 177Lu-DOTA-IBA were studied. Normal mice and tumor-bearing mice were imaged using micro SPECT/CT. With Ethics Committee approval, five volunteers were recruited for a preliminary clinical translation study. 177Lu-DOTA-IBA has a radiochemical purity of more than 98%, with good biological properties and safety. Blood clearance is fast and soft tissue uptake is low. Tracers are excreted mainly through the urinary system, targeting and continuously concentrating in the bones. Three patients experienced significant pain relief within 3 days after 177Lu-DOTA-IBA treatment (740-1110 MBq), lasting more than 2 months, with no toxic side effects. 177Lu-DOTA-IBA is easy to prepare and exhibits good pharmacokinetic characteristics. Low-dose 177Lu-DOTA-IBA is effective, well tolerated, and was associated with no significant adverse reactions. It is a promising radiopharmaceutical for the targeted treatment of bone metastases, controlling the progress of bone metastasis and improving survival and quality of life of patients with advanced bone metastasis.

Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms Affect Osteoporosis-Related Traits and Response to Antiresorptive Therapy.

The present study analyzed the effect of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms (ApaI, TaqI, BsmI, FokI, and Cdx2) on bone mineral density (BMD), biochemical parameters and bone turnover markers, fracture prevalence, and response to three types of antiresorptive therapy (estrogen-progesterone, raloxifene, and ibandronate) in 356 postmenopausal women from Slovakia. Association analysis revealed a significant effect of BsmI polymorphism on lumbar spine BMD, serum osteocalcin (OC), and ß-CrossLaps levels. While ApaI and Cdx2 polymorphisms were associated with OC and alkaline phosphatase, TaqI polymorphism affected all turnover markers. ApaI, TaqI, and BsmI genotypes increased the risk of spinal, radial, or total fractures with odds ratios ranging from 2.03 to 3.17. Each of therapy types evaluated had a beneficial effect on all osteoporosis-related traits; however, the VDR gene affected only ibandronate and raloxifene treatment. ApaI/aa, TaqI/TT, and BsmI/bb genotypes showed a weaker or no response to ibandronate therapy in femoral and spinal BMD. The impact of aforementioned polymorphisms on turnover markers was also genotype dependent. On the contrary, only TaqI and BsmI polymorphisms influenced raloxifene therapy, even only in lumbar spine BMD. These results point to the potential of using the VDR gene in personalized pharmacotherapy of osteoporosis.

Inhibition of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase alleviates cardiomyopathy in diabetic rat.

This study investigated the effects of ibandronate (IBN) on cardiomyopathy remodeling in diabetic rats. A rat model of diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) was established by supplementing them with a high-calorie diet combined with a low dose of streptozotocin (STZ). The diabetic rats received IBN (5 µg/kg per day) or normal saline subcutaneously for 16 weeks. The hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson's trichrome staining were performed for evaluating the myocardial morphologies of the rats. Echocardiography and cardiac catheter were performed to assess their cardiac functional parameters. The protein levels of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS), and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) were determined using Western blot analysis. RhoA activation was detected using a small GTP protease-linked immunosorbent assay (GLISA). The diabetic rats showed the development of moderate hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, myocardial fibrosis, FPPS overexpression, cardiac systolic, and diastolic dysfunction. Inhibiting the FPPS could ameliorate myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis. These anatomical findings were accompanied by a significant improvement in heart function. Furthermore, the inhibition of FPPS, the increased activation of RhoA, and phosphorylation of p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 in DCM decreased significantly with the treatment of IBN. This study for the first time demonstrated that the upregulation of FPPS expression might be involved in diabetic myocardial remodeling in diabetes mellitus (DM). In addition, IBN might exert its inhibitory effects on myocardial tissue remodeling by suppressing the RhoA/ERK1/2 and RhoA/p38 MAPK pathways in DCM.

Aminobisfosfonatos: reconsideración a los 25 años de su aprobación para el tratamiento de la osteoporosis / Aminobisphosphonates: Reconsideration 25 years after their approval for the treatment of osteoporosis

Aminobisphosphonates are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. They have a high affinity for hydroxyapatite, binding primarily to resorbing surfaces, but also to forming surfaces and to some extent to resting surfaces. They inhibit osteoclasts, thereby decreasing remodelling units. Consequently, they increase bone mass and reduce stress risers. This decreases the risk of fractures. If this decrease is sufficient, they can be temporarily withdrawn (drug holidays), which prevents serious complications (atypical femoral fracture). They probably reduce mortality. Virtually all patients with osteoporosis can benefit from them at some point in the course of their disease (at the beginning of treatment or after the administration of anabolics, selective estrogen receptor modulators or denosumab). If well tolerated orally, alendronate and risedronate are preferable. Otherwise, zoledronate is preferred. Their efficacy vs. cost-safety-convenience ratio makes aminobisphosphonates reference drugs in the field of osteoporosis. (AU)

Los aminobisfosfonatos se utilizan ampliamente en el tratamiento de la osteoporosis. Tienen gran afinidad por la hidroxiapatita, uniéndose fundamentalmente a las superficies en resorción, pero también a las superficies en formación y, en cierta medida, a las superficies en reposo. Inhiben a los osteoclastos, con lo que disminuyen las unidades de remodelación. En consecuencia, aumentan la masa ósea y reducen los concentradores de tensión. Ello disminuye el riesgo de fracturas. Si esta disminución es suficiente, pueden retirarse transitoriamente (vacaciones terapéuticas), lo que previene complicaciones graves (fractura atípica de fémur). Probablemente disminuyen la mortalidad. Pueden beneficiarse de ellos prácticamente todos los enfermos con osteoporosis en algún momento de su evolución (al comienzo del tratamiento o tras la administración de anabólicos, moduladores selectivos de los receptores estrogénicos o denosumab). Con buena tolerancia oral son preferibles el alendronato y el risedronato. En caso contrario, lo es el zoledronato. Su relación eficacia frente a coste-seguridad-comodidad los convierte en fármacos de referencia en el campo de la osteoporosis. (AU)

Verification of efficacy and safety of ibandronate or denosumab for postmenopausal osteoporosis after 12-month treatment with romosozumab as sequential therapy: The prospective VICTOR study.

Romosozumab is a potent drug for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis but has a limited dosing period of 12 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) decreases soon after romosozumab discontinuation, thus emphasizing the importance of appropriate sequential treatment. The present VICTOR randomized controlled study compared the efficacy of ibandronate and denosumab as sequential therapy options following 12-month romosozumab treatment. Subjects completing 12 months of romosozumab administration for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive either ibandronate or denosumab for an additional 12 months. The primary outcome of interest was the percentage changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck from 12 months (completion of romosozumab) to 18 and 24 months of total treatment (6 and 12 months, respectively, after the conversion to sequential therapy). Secondary outcomes included alterations in serum bone turnover markers and the incidence of adverse events. Sixty-two subjects each in the ibandronate and denosumab groups completed the sequential therapy. The respective percentage changes in BMD at the lumbar spine from 12 months to 24 months were 2.5 % in the ibandronate group and 5.4 % in the denosumab group. At 24 months, we observed significant differences versus 12 months for both groups as well as between the groups (all P < 0.01), showing a superior ability to increase BMD at the lumbar spine for denosumab over ibandronate. BMD gains at the total hip and femoral neck exhibited comparably favorable trends. P1NP and TRACP-5b were significantly decreased from 12 to 24 months (-64.9 % and - 26.8 % in the ibandronate group and - 67.4 % and - 36.3 % in the denosumab group, respectively; all P < 0.001 versus 12 months). Several minor adverse events were recorded in both groups, none of which led to the discontinuation of the trial. The VICTOR study revealed that denosumab could be considered more effective than ibandronate, with few severe adverse events, for the enhancement of BMD as a sequential agent after romosozumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients.

Aminobisphosphonates: Reconsideration 25 years after their approval for the treatment of osteoporosis. / Aminobisfosfonatos: reconsideración a los 25 años de su aprobación para el tratamiento de la osteoporosis.

Aminobisphosphonates are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. They have a high affinity for hydroxyapatite, binding primarily to resorbing surfaces, but also to forming surfaces and to some extent to resting surfaces. They inhibit osteoclasts, thereby decreasing remodelling units. Consequently, they increase bone mass and reduce stress risers. This decreases the risk of fractures. If this decrease is sufficient, they can be temporarily withdrawn (drug holidays), which prevents serious complications (atypical femoral fracture). They probably reduce mortality. Virtually all patients with osteoporosis can benefit from them at some point in the course of their disease (at the beginning of treatment or after the administration of anabolics, selective estrogen receptor modulators or denosumab). If well tolerated orally, alendronate and risedronate are preferable. Otherwise, zoledronate is preferred. Their efficacy vs. cost-safety-convenience ratio makes aminobisphosphonates reference drugs in the field of osteoporosis.

Risks of serious adverse events and kidney injury in patients treated with ibandronate: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several reports suggest that adverse events caused by ibandronate are less serious than those associated with the other bisphosphonates. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether ibandronate has low rates of serious adverse events and kidney injury. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were selected, and the study populations consisted of adult patients with osteoporosis. The primary outcome was all serious adverse events and the secondary outcome was kidney injury. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were eligible for inclusion. No significant difference in the rate of serious adverse events or that of kidney injury was found between ibandronate and placebo or between ibandronate and other bisphosphonates. However, a sensitivity analysis, which excluded studies at "high risk" of detection bias, found that the risk of serious adverse events was significantly lower for ibandronate than for the other bisphosphonates (risk ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.94, p < 0.01). This finding was assessed as high-quality evidence when the GRADE criteria were applied. Only five studies (26%) reported kidney injury as an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence was found to suggest that ibandronate may carry a lower risk of serious adverse events compared with other bisphosphonates. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the risk of kidney injury associated with the various bisphosphonates.

Effect of Ibandronate Therapy on Serum Chemerin, Vaspin, Omentin-1 and Osteoprotegerin (OPG) in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Females.

Osteoporosis is a condition in which bone mineral density is reduced due to altered bone microstructure, which results in increased skeletal fragility and incidence of various types of fractures. Adipokines such as chemerin, vaspin, omentin-1 and osteoprotegerin are involved in bone remodeling. The current study was designed to determine the changes in circulating chemerin, vaspin, omentin-1, and osteoprotegerin levels after treatment with oral ibandronate 150 mg in postmenopausal osteoporotic females. The present study enrolled 107 postmenopausal osteoporotic females from a tertiary care hospital in Faisalabad, Pakistan, based on stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sixty-six healthy postmenopausal, non-osteoporotic females with no systemic illness were chosen from the general population. The assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) was done using a DEXA scan. Serum levels of chemerin, vaspin, omentin-1 and osteoprotegerin were estimated using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. The collected data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24. Following 6 months of ibandronate treatment, there was a significant decrease of 24.24% (p < .033) in serum chemerin levels, as well as a significant increase in serum vaspin levels 343.32% (p < .001) and osteoprotegerin levels 19.57% (p < .001), with no significant change in omentin-1 levels. Thus, an increase in serum chemerin levels and a decrease in serum vaspin and osteoprotegerin levels could be implicated in osteoporosis.

Ibandronate Suppresses Changes in Apatite Orientation and Young's Modulus Caused by Estrogen Deficiency in Rat Vertebrae.

Bone material quality is important for evaluating the mechanical integrity of diseased and/or medically treated bones. However, compared to the knowledge accumulated regarding changes in bone mass, our understanding of the quality of bone material is lacking. In this study, we clarified the changes in bone material quality mainly characterized by the preferential orientation of the apatite c-axis associated with estrogen deficiency-induced osteoporosis, and their prevention using ibandronate (IBN), a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate. IBN effectively prevented bone loss and degradation of whole bone strength in a dose-dependent manner. The estrogen-deficient condition abnormally increased the degree of apatite orientation along the craniocaudal axis in which principal stress is applied; IBN at higher doses played a role in maintaining the normal orientation of apatite but not at lower doses. The bone size-independent Young's modulus along the craniocaudal axis of the anterior cortical shell of the vertebra showed a significant and positive correlation with apatite orientation; therefore, the craniocaudal Young's modulus abnormally increased under estrogen-deficient conditions, despite a significant decrease in volumetric bone mineral density. However, the abnormal increase in craniocaudal Young's modulus did not compensate for the degradation of whole bone mechanical properties due to the bone loss. In conclusion, it was clarified that changes in the material quality, which are hidden in bone mass evaluation, occur with estrogen deficiency-induced osteoporosis and IBN treatment. Here, IBN was shown to be a beneficial drug that suppresses abnormal changes in bone mechanical integrity caused by estrogen deficiency at both the whole bone and material levels.

Combination treatment with ibandronate and eldecalcitol prevents osteoporotic bone loss and deterioration of bone quality characterized by nano-arrangement of the collagen/apatite in an ovariectomized aged rat model.

Combination therapy with bisphosphonates and vitamin D3 analogs has been frequently used for the treatment of osteoporosis. However, its effects on bone anisotropies, such as orientations of collagen and apatite at the nanometer-scale, which is a promising bone quality index, and its trabecular architecture at the micrometer scale, are not well understood despite its important mechanical properties and its role in fracture risk. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of ibandronate (IBN), eldecalcitol (ELD), and their combination on the collagen/apatite orientation and trabecular architectural anisotropy using an estrogen-deficiency-induced osteoporotic rat model. Estrogen deficiency caused by ovariectomy (OVX) excessively increased the degree of collagen/apatite orientation or trabecular architectural anisotropy along the craniocaudal axis in the lumbar vertebra compared to that of the sham-operated group. The craniocaudal axis corresponds to the direction of principal stress in the spine. The excessive material anisotropy in the craniocaudal axis contributed to the enhanced Young's modulus, which may compensate for the reduced mechanical resistance by bone loss to some extent. The solo administration of IBN and ELD prevented the reduction of bone fraction (BV/TV) determined by µ-CT, and combination therapy showed the highest efficacy in BV/TV gain. Furthermore, the solo administration and combination treatment significantly decreased the degree of collagen/apatite orientation to the sham level. Based on the results of bone mass and collagen/apatite orientation, combination treatment is an effective strategy. This is the first report to demonstrate the efficacy of IBN, ELD, and combination treatment with IBN and ELD relative to the bone micro-architectural anisotropy characterized by collagen/apatite orientation.