RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 is a potentially serious new infection firstly broken out in the North East Italy during Spring 2020. Patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) have a known increased risk of infections, that could precipitate to adrenal crisis. Even COVID-19-related psycho-social impact could affect their health, requiring a dynamic adaptation of daily glucocorticoid (GC) therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of COVID-19 infection and self-reported outcomes in AI patients after the first pandemic waves. METHODS: Open-label, cross-sectional monocentric study on 84 (65 primary, 19 secondary) AI patients, resident in Veneto and followed-up in our out clinical of Endocrine Unit. All patients underwent serological investigation of anti-SARS-CoV2 IgG and purpose-built "ADDI-COVID" questionnaire by August 2020 and were recontacted to reevaluate COVID-19 infection occurrence in March-April 2021. RESULTS: All patients resulted negative to the serological test for anti-SARS-CoV2 IgG at the end of the first pandemic wave. After the third wave, COVID-19 infection occurred in 8 patients without need of hospitalization. Half patients felt an increased risk of COVID-19 infection, significantly associated with increased stress and GC stress-dose. Only one patient reported adrenal crisis stress-correlated. The majority of AI workers changed working habits, significantly reducing COVID-19-related stress. CONCLUSION: AI patients did not show an increased incidence of COVID-19, but the perception of increased COVID-19 infection risk significantly impacts their psychological well-being, working habits and GC daily doses. Therapeutic patient education is crucial especially for AI workers to prevent and treat situations that could lead to an adrenal crisis.
RESUMO
Patients with severe COVID-19 both seroconvert earlier and develop higher concentrations of SARS- CoV-2-specific IgG than patients with mild symptoms. In this retrospective study we considered different categories of patients defined as "vulnerable" because affected by other pathologies, such as patients with genetic and cardiovascular diseases; patients with autoimmune dermatological dis- ease; kidney and lung transplant patients, and pregnant women because the prevalence of Covid-19 infection during pregnancy is not known. This study was performed at IRCCS San Matteo Hospital in Pavia, North Italy, a zone considered at high risk during the COVID-19 pandemic from June to December 2020. None of the positive screened patients had symptoms of COVID-19 infection at the time of inclusion in this study.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Anticorpos Antivirais , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Abstract: Objective: To detect serum IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 in pre- and post- Covid-19 pandemic in Mexican asymptomatic subjects in order to know the degree of viral dispersion. Materials and methods: Association of serum IgG antibodies (determined by ELISA) to sociodemographic and clinical data or contact with Covid-19 cases in three groups of subjects: 1) Covid-19 pre-pandemic blood donors (n= 538); 2) Covid-19 post-pandemic blood donors (n= 243); 3) Covid-19 post-pandemic neurological patients (n= 312). None of the subjects studied had been vaccinated. Results: The positive rate of IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 was notably higher in participants recruited during the pandemic (donors, 29.6%; neurological patients, 15.7%) than in those recruited pre-pandemic (donors 0.6%) (p <0.001). Other conditions associated to antibody positivity were being a worker in sales or services, or having had previous contact with people with Covid-19, for donnors and neurological patients, and having diabetes mellitus, for neurological patients. Higher positivity levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG were found in females than in males. The highest proportion of subjects with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was found in central Mexico. Conclusions: The dispersion of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic, unvaccinated subjects (donors and neurological patients) recruited in a Mexican health institution, who work in sales or services or had previously had contact with Covid-19 patients is 16 to 30%. The level of positivity for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG is higher in females than in males. SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence follow-up studies must be favored among the general population, being mandatory for donors.
Resumen: Objetivo: Detectar IgG sérica anti-SARS-CoV-2 antes y después de la pandemia de Covid-19 en sujetos mexicanos asintomáticos, con la intención de conocer el grado de dispersión viral. Material y métodos: Se analizó la asociación de anticuerpos IgG séricos (determinados por ELISA), datos sociodemográficos y clínicos y contacto con casos de Covid-19 en tres grupos de sujetos: 1) donadores de sangre reclutados antes de la pandemia de Covid-19 (n= 538); 2) donadores (n= 243) y 3) pacientes neurológicos (n= 312) reclutados durante la pandemia de Covid-19. Ninguno de los sujetos estudiados había sido vacunado. Resultados: La tasa de positividad de IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 fue notablemente mayor en los participantes reclutados durante la pandemia (donadores, 29.6%; pacientes neurológicos, 15.7%) que en los reclutados prepandemia (donadores 0.6%). Otras condiciones asociadas con positividad de anticuerpos fueron trabajar en ventas o servicios, o haber tenido contacto previo con pacientes Covid-19, en donadores y pacientes neurológicos, y haber tenido diabetes mellitus, en pacientes neurológicos. Se encontraron mayores niveles de positividad de IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 en mujeres que en hombres. La mayor proporción de sujetos con anticuerpos anti-SARS-CoV-2 procedía del centro de México. Conclusiones: La dispersión del SARS-CoV-2 en sujetos asintomáticos, no vacunados (donadores y pacientes neurológicos), reclutados en una institución de salud mexicana, que trabajan en ventas o servicios, o tienen contacto previo con pacientes Covid-19 es de 16 a 30%. El nivel de positividad de IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 es más alto en mujeres que en hombres. Los estudios de seguimiento de la seroprevalencia del SARS-CoV-2 deben favorecerse en la población general, siendo obligatorios en los donadores.
RESUMO
Introducción: En el presente trabajo se muestran los resultados de la validación de los ensayos serológicos in vitro para la detección de anticuerpos IgM, IgG y anticuerpos totales contra el SARS-CoV-2 UMELISA SARS-CoV-2 IgM, UMELISA ANTI-SARS-CoV-2 y UMELISA SARS-CoV-2 IgG desarrollados por el Centro de Inmunoensayo (CIE). Métodos: Se utilizaron paneles de muestras de suero de individuos negativos y de casos confirmados de COVID-19 para determinar el desempeño analítico de cada ensayo. Resultados: La especificidad clínica de los ensayos UMELISA SARS-CoV-2 IgM, UMELISA ANTI-SARS-CoV-2 y UMELISA SARS-CoV-2 IgG fue del 100 por ciento en todos los ensayos y la especificidad analítica fue de 100 por ciento para los dos primeros ensayos y del 93,1 por cientopara el último. La sensibilidad clínica fue de 64,3, 80,8 y 97,5 por ciento, respectivamente. El valor predictivo positivo fue de 100 por ciento en todos los ensayos, en tanto que el negativo osciló entre 83,3 y 95,2 por ciento. La concordancia fluctuó entre 92,4 y 96,9 por ciento y el índice kappa de todos los ensayos fue muy bueno. La sensibilidad de los ensayos se incrementó a 82,76, 96,5 y 100 por ciento, respectivamente, en las muestras de suero colectadas con más de 14 días de iniciado el cuadro clínico. Conclusiones: Los ensayos demostraron una elevada sensibilidad y especificidad, lo que permite contar con herramientas basadas en una tecnología desarrollada en Cuba que posibilita la realización de estudios serológicos, vigilancia epidemiológica y de otro tipo, incluyendo los relacionados con vacunas en una plataforma con amplia distribución nacional(AU)
Introduction: This paper shows the results obtained in the validation of in vitro serological assays to detect IgM, IgG antibodies, and total antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 UMELISA SARS-CoV-2 IgM, UMELISA ANTI-SARS-CoV-2 and UMELISA SARS-CoV-2 IgG developed by the Immunoassay Center. Methods: Panels of serum samples from negative and COVID-19 confirmed patients were used to determine the analytical performance of each assay. Results: UMELISA SARS-CoV-2 IgM, UMELISA ANTI-SARS-CoV-2 and UMELISA SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays demonstrated 100 percent clinical specificity for all assays; and 100 percent analytical specificity for the first two assays, and 93.1 percent for the last one. Clinical sensitivity was 64.3 percent, 80.8 percent and 97.5 percent, respectively. The positive predictive value was 100 percent in all assays, while the negative predictive value ranged from 83.3 percent to 95.2 percent. Concordance varied from 92.4 percent to 96.9 percent, and kappa index in every assay was very good. Assays sensitivity increased to 82.7 percent, 96.5 percent and 100 percent, respectively for serum samples collected more than 14 days after onset of the symptoms. Conclusions: The assays demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, which allows us to have Cuban technology-based tools for serological, epidemiological surveillance, and other types of studies, including those related to vaccines on a platform with wide national distribution(AU)