Impact of labially inclined implant axes on immediate implant placement and provisionalization in anterior maxilla: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether a labially inclined implant axis compromises the clinical outcomes of immediate implant placement and provisionalization (IIPP) in the anterior maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with unsalvageable central or lateral maxillary incisors were enrolled. IIPP with simultaneous connective tissue graft (CTG) was performed in all participants. In the control group, the alveolar ridge had a long axis aligned with the tooth, which ensured that the immediate implant was aimed at the incisor edge or the cingulum of future restoration. The test group had a large angle between the axes of the ridge and tooth. To avoid bone fenestration, the implants were placed labially inclined and emerged from the labial side of future restoration. Intra-oral scanning and cone-beam computed tomography were performed to record soft and hard tissue profiles at baseline and 1 year later. Soft tissue stability, bone remodeling, and pink esthetic score (PES) were evaluated and compared between two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-nine participants (19 tests and 20 controls) completed the study. At 1-year post-surgery, the mid-facial gingival margin migrations were 0.85 ± 0.37 mm (test) and 0.81 ± 0.33 mm (control), without significant differences. No differences were identified in buccal profile alteration, linear ridge reduction, buccal bone thickness, or PES scores. The test group demonstrated thinner buccal soft tissue at the crestal level than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: When large tooth-ridge angulation presented, labially inclined implant, avoiding buccal ridge fenestration in IIPP with CTG, did not compromise the clinical outcome in short term.

Immediate implant placement in a dialysis patient. A case report.

Implant-supported rehabilitation in high-risk patients poses significant challenges for the dental team. The presence of comorbidities and increased infection risk can, for example, lead to a higher risk of implant loss. For the therapy to be completed with as few complications as possible, special anamnesis, detailed diagnostics, and a risk analysis based on those findings are indispensable. The aim of all considerations is to keep the risk of infection for the patient with a disease history to a minimum and to strive for an appropriate functional and esthetic therapeutic success. Particularly in the esthetic zone, in addition to the general health risks of the surgical procedure, esthetic aspects are increasingly taken into account in planning. The present article describes the implant-prosthetic replacement of a single anterior tooth in a dialysis patient. Several aspects (regular dialysis, missing buccal lamella, high smile line, functional risk) increased the risk of complications in this case.

Bone Volume Assessment Around Immediate Dental Implant in the Esthetic Area with Immediate Tooth-Like Single Crown Provisionalization: A Laser and Computed Tomography 1-Year Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: To examine the remodeling process of both the soft and hard tissue components of the postextraction socket around immediately loaded dental implants after tooth extraction in maxillary esthetic areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects underwent immediate placement of single implants in postextraction sockets without bone grafting, and their immediate provisionalization with custom tooth-like interim crowns were fabricated using digital diagnostic impressions and a dental milling machine. Intraoperative and 1-year follow-up layered scans of the postextraction sockets after implantation were acquired using a 3D optical system. In the short term, subjects underwent computed tomographic scans. Digital impressions for gingival contours, originally stored as STL (standard tessellation language) files, were converted to DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) files with the implant shoulder working as a referral point, which were then superimposed to 3D radiologic images. The observed volumetric and linear outcomes were measured using a program known as DentaScan. The width of the alveolar crest at the level of the implant shoulder and marginal bone levels were acquired. Nonparametric tests were applied with a level of significance set at P < .01. RESULTS: No failure was reported after a follow-up of 1 year. Little or no inflammation of the treated areas was registered, and there were practically no signs of suppuration. The areas showed a significant reduction in the overall volumes for both soft and bone tissue, with a P value < .0001 from the baseline (0.983 ± 0.172 cm3) to the 1-year survey (0.865 ± 0.156 cm3). If the soft and bone tissue changes were separately evaluated, a significant loss (with a P value < .0001) was registered for only the bone tissues (from 0.434 ± 0.075 to 0.355 ± 0.061 cm3). Moreover, changes in gingival tissue from baseline to the 1-year survey (-0.040 ± 0.067) appeared to be significantly different from the overall volume loss (-0.118 ± 0.083 cm3). A shrinkage in width (-0.5 ± 0.7 mm) was found from baseline (12.6 ± 0.6 mm) to the 1-year follow-up (12.1 ± 0.9 mm). Marginal bone levels were 0.97 ± 0.70 mm and 0.39 ± 0.78 mm, respectively, at the mesial and distal aspects of the implants. CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis suggested that immediately customized provisionalization was effective enough to prevent both volume loss and linear shrinkage at the layers of the treated areas. Moreover, the buccal aspects seemed to be the areas most affected by the loss of volume. The mean loss in width, which amounted to roughly 0.5 mm, appeared to be negligible when compared to the overall width measured before surgery.

Immediate implant placement with and without provisionalization: A comparison of a one-year longitudinal study.

Background/purpose: Immediate implant placement (IIP) with and without immediate provisionalization (Ipro) may yield satisfactory results in appropriate indications and treatment, especially in the esthetic zone. The aim of this study was to compare implant stability, marginal bone loss (MBL), survival rates, and patient satisfaction between IIP with Ipro and IIP without Ipro. Materials and methods: Seventy patients, each with a failed maxillary anterior tooth, were randomly assigned to IIP with Ipro (Group A: n = 35) or IIP without Ipro (Group B: n = 35). Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and standardized periapical radiographs were performed at surgery and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively to investigate implant stability and MBL, respectively. Survival was assessed 1 year after surgery. Patient satisfaction was evaluated with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: Primary ISQ and MBL were not significantly different between groups A and B immediately after surgery (P ＞ 0.05). Implant survival was 100% in both groups, and only one mechanical complication was observed. Patient satisfaction was good at definitive crown delivery and postoperatively 1-year in both groups. However, the immediate postoperative VAS score in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Group A revealed significantly higher secondary ISQ than Group B at postoperatively 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. There were no significant differences between groups A and B in terms of MBL and survival. Notably, patient satisfaction in Group A was significantly higher than in Group B immediately after surgery.

Volume assessment of the external contour around immediate implant with or without immediate tooth-like crown provisionalization: A digital intraoral scans study.

PURPOSES: To examine differences between immediate and delayed dental implant loading in maxillary aesthetic areas. METHODS: In this retrospective controlled analysis, 43 subjects who underwent immediate placement of the dental implant in a post-extraction socket were ranked into either immediate (24 implants loaded with non-occlusal tooth-like profile provisional prostheses fabricated by virtual diagnostic impressions and an in-office dental milling machine) or delayed group (19 implants loaded with conventional cover screws and secondary intention healing). Intraoperatively and then four months later, scans of the external layers were acquired with an optical scanner. The width of the alveolar crest and Jemt papilla index were acquired. Non-parametric tests were applied with a level of significance set at p < 0.01. RESULTS: In both groups, the volumes and areas showed significant reductions from the baseline to the 4-month survey. Reductions in volume appeared to be statistically different between the two groups (-39±31 mm3 for the immediate and 89 ± 30 mm3 for the delayed group). The final Jemt papilla index appeared significantly different between the immediate (mesial, 2.5 and, distal, 3) and delayed groups (2 for both aspects). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate provisionalization significantly reduced volume loss and area shrinkage at the external layer when data were compared to a delayed rehabilitation strategy.

Facial implant gingival level and thickness changes following maxillary anterior immediate tooth replacement with scarf-connective tissue graft: A 4-13-year retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: A scarf-shaped connective tissue graft can be placed at the facial and proximal aspect of the peri-implant soft tissue zone during immediate implant placement and provisionalization (IIPP) procedures in the esthetic zone to optimize implant esthetics without the need of flap reflection. This retrospective study evaluated soft tissue stability after scarf-connective tissue graft (S-CTG) in conjunction with IIPP procedures in the esthetic zone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received IIPP with S-CTG with a minimum 1-year follow-up were evaluated. Mid-facial gingival level (MFGL) change and mid-facial gingival thickness (MFGT) change were measured and compared at the pre-op (T0), IIPP + S-CTG surgery (T1), follow up appointment with MFGT measurement (T2), and latest follow-up appointment (T3). Implant success rate and graft necrosis were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 22 IIPP and S-CTG procedures in 20 patients were evaluated in the study. After a mean follow-up of 8.2 years (3.9-13.4) (T3), all implants remained osseointegrated (22/22 [100%]), with statistically insignificant mean midfacial gingival level change of -0.19 mm (-1.5 to 0.8). Statistically significant difference in midfacial gingival thickness (MFGT) was noted (2.5 mm [1.8-3.5 mm]) after a mean follow-up time (T2) of 2.3 years (1-8.6) when compared with MFGT at baseline (1.1 mm [0.6-1.3 mm]) (T1). Necrosis of S-CTG during initial healing phase was noted in 9% (2/22) of the sites. CONCLUSIONS: Within the confines of this study, scarf-connective tissue graft at time of immediate implant placement and provisionalization can thicken the gingiva and maintain the gingival level at the critical soft tissue zone. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Managing the soft tissue zone is as important as that of the hard tissue zone for peri-implant esthetics. Connective tissue graft is one of the methods that can enhance the final esthetic outcomes. This retrospective study has demonstrated that Scarf-CTG technique is an effective treatment modality to maintain soft tissue stability.

Soft tissue esthetics around immediately provisionalized delayed implants with and without connective tissue graft: A randomized clinical trial pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the peri-implant soft tissue esthetics following a single, immediately provisionalized, delayed implant with/-out subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The eligible patients were randomized into two groups. Immediate provisionalization was performed with (test group: SCTGG) or without SCTG (control group: NGG). The soft tissue esthetics was assessed by Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and Mucosal Scarring Index (MSI), at 6 and 12 months, following final implant restoration. RESULTS: The SCTGG, compared to NGG, yielded a 0.2 increased PES at 12 months (95% confidence interval (CI): -1, 1.4) and a 0.2 decreased MSI score (95% CI -0.9, 0.5) with no statistically significant differences in PES and MSI between both groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Soft tissue grafting around immediately provisionalized delayed implants could exhibit comparable results to immediate provisionalization alone in terms of peri-implant soft tissue esthetics using PES and MSI (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03770975).

The soft tissue esthetic outcome with and without immediate provisionalization in immediate implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at checking influences of immediate provisionalization on the primary esthetic outcome by Pink Esthetic Score (PES) as well as other secondary soft tissue outcomes such as bleeding on probing, probing depth, plaque index, mesial papillary recession, distal papillary recession, and midfacial mucosal recession of the peri-implant mucosa around immediately placed implants in the anterior maxilla. Setting and Design: This systematic review and meta-analysis was evaluated using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Materials and Methods: The relevant studies were found in the databases such as MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The search was restricted to studies published in English only, with no time constraints. A second hand search was conducted on individual journals and study reference lists. The Evidence Project risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. The level of evidence was determined using the GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool (software). McMaster University, 2020 (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc.,). Statistical Analysis Used: The statistical meta-analysis was conducted by using Review Manager (RevMan) (Computer Program). Version 5.4. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, the Cochrane Collaboration, 2020. Results: Nine studies were finalized. Seven studies were selected out of nine in the meta-analysis for PES. The results of the current meta-analysis for primary outcome observed that immediate implant placement (IIP) followed by immediate provisionalization improves the esthetic outcome, with forest plot favoring immediate provisionalization and demonstrating a statistically significant difference (mean difference [MD] =1.54, [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-2.27], P < 0.0001). Statistically insignificant result was observed for secondary outcomes; bleeding on probing (MD = 4.00, [95% CI: -1.15-9.15], P = 0.13), probing depth (MD = 0.17, [95% CI: -0.13-0.48], P = 0.26), plaque index (MD = -1.00, [95% CI: -7.56-5.56], P = 0.77), mesial papillary recession (MD = -0.10, [95% CI: -0.31-0.10], P = 0.33), midfacial mucosal recession (MD = -0.47, [95% CI: -1.01-0.07], P = 0.09). However, for distal papillary recession (MD = -0.32, [95% CI: -0.50--0.13], P = 0.0007), the result was statistically significant with forest plot favoring immediate provisionalization. Conclusion: When the implant is placed in the esthetic zone, IIP with immediate provisionalization provides the best gingival (pink) esthetics.

Clinical evaluation of the buccal aspect around immediate implant using dual zone therapeutic concept versus buccal gap fill to bone level: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Soft tissue esthetics for immediate implant is considered challenging when restoring a tooth in an esthetic zone. This study aimed to evaluate the buccal aspect after immediate implant using the dual-zone therapeutic concept compared to grafting the buccal gap to the bone crest. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients were randomly assigned into either immediate implant with the dual-zone therapeutic concept (DZ, test group) or with bone grafting till buccal bone crest with immediate temporization (BCG, control group). Pink esthetic score (PES), buccal bone loss (BBL), mid-facial recession (MFR), soft tissue thickness (STT), keratinized tissue width (KTW), post-operative swelling (POS), and patient satisfaction (PS) were evaluated for 1 year. RESULTS: At 12 months the PES in the test group was 11.36 ± 1.69, and 10.80 ± 1.55 in the control group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.45). MFR in the DZ and BCG groups was 0.27 ± 0.34 and 0.45 ± 0.44 after 12 months with no statistical significance difference (p = 0.195). The STT assessment showed a statistically significant increase in both groups, however the intergroup comparison was statistically not significant (p = 0.23). The mean KTW in the DZ and BCG groups was 4.55 ± 1.08 and 4.20 ± 0.82 mm, respectively with no statistical significance (p = 0.42). There was no statistical significant difference in patient satisfaction between the two groups except in question number 10 concerning the post-operative swelling which was higher in the DZ group (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment modalities are considered reliable methods to achieve good soft tissue esthetics. However, both treatment modalities were not effective in preventing facial bone resorption despite the use of bone graft.

Enhancing the Esthetics of a Maxillary Central Implant Crown with a Hybrid-Abutment: A Case Report.

Reducing the fabrication time and costs involved in classical methods of implant crown production are goals being constantly pursued. Consequently, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing technologies have evolved considerably, offering improved and predictable outcomes in terms of esthetics and function. The aim of this case report is to demonstrate how hybrid-abutments can provide optimum esthetics and biomechanical foundations. A 57-year-old woman had a non-restorable tooth #8, which was indicated for extraction and immediate implant placement. Lithium disilicate (LD) crowns were used to restore the adjacent teeth #7, 9, and 10. A zirconia abutment was used to block the gray color of the titanium base. The zirconia abutment finish line was designed to be placed 1-mm apical to the free marginal gingiva of the adjacent tooth, and an LD implant crown was cemented on the hybrid-abutment. The technique demonstrated promising results, and after more than 18 months of follow-up following the implant placement, the surrounding soft tissue was well adapted around the implant crown. The hybrid-abutment enhanced the esthetics of the definitive restoration as well as saved time and cost by elimination of the casting step.

Immediate implant placement vs. early implant treatment in the esthetic area. A 1-year randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of implant placement and temporization timing on esthetic outcomes of single maxillary anterior implants with intact bone walls and interproximal bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Test group patients received an immediate implant with immediate provisional restoration and socket preservation, while patients in the control group received an early implant placement with guided bone regeneration and delayed loading. Patients were followed for 1 year after final prosthetic and pink esthetic score (PES), mid-buccal mucosal level (MBML), crestal bone changes (CBC), and peri-implant soft tissue parameters, and patient chair time was recorded. RESULTS: Fifty patients received the intended treatment (25 test and 25 control). No implants failed. PES after 1 year was 12.8 ± 1.19 for the test group and 12.5 ± 1.36 for the control group (p = .362). MBML difference between baseline (after final crown delivery) and the 1-year follow-up was gain of 0.2 ± 1.02 mm for the test group (p = .047) and no change in the control group. CBC after 1 year were 0.1 mm ± 0.21 mm (mesial) and 0.2 mm ± 0.22 mm (distal) for the test group and 0.2 mm ± 0.25 mm (mesial) and 0.3 mm ± 0.19 mm (distal) for the control group, p = .540 (mesial) and p = .462 (distal). Test group required half the chair time (127 ± 13 min) when compared to the control group (259 ± 15 min, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this trial, both treatment protocols resulted in excellent esthetic outcomes with PES >12 after 1-year follow-up.

Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This open, single-cohort, multicenter, prospective study investigated the efficacy of immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implant for single-tooth restorations in the anterior and premolar regions of the maxilla after 5 years of function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All implants were placed in healed sites and immediately provisionalized. MBLs, soft-tissue parameters, and oral-health impact profile (OHIP) were evaluated at implant insertion, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used for statistical and implant survival/success analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (81 implants) completed the 5-year follow-up. The 5-year cumulative survival and success rates were 97.8%, and the mean MBL change from implant insertion to 5 years was - 0.80 ± 1.13 mm. Optimal papilla index scores were observed at 90.1% of sites at 5 years compared with 32.8% of sites at insertion. Pink esthetic score, modified bleeding and plaque indices, and OHIP showed statistically significant improvement at the 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants promote marginal bone stability and excellent esthetic outcomes after 5 years of function. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This treatment is a viable option for patients requiring immediately provisionalized single-tooth restorations in the esthetic zone and shows favorable long-term clinical outcomes, including marginal bone stability and excellent esthetics.

Clinical study to assess influence of immediate provisionalization and various implant morphologies on implant stability: A prospective clinical study.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different implant morphologies and immediate provisionalization options on the change of implant stability. Methods: 94 Patients were randomized to receive implants from Straumann® BL/Straumann® BLT/Astra OsseoSpeed® TX, meanwhile having the same opportunity to receive healing abutment or immediate provisionalization. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and marginal bone loss (MBL) were recorded at following timepoints. Parametric statistic was used for data analysis. Results: Data showed that ISQ and MBL values of conical/straight/straight with micro-thread neck implants had no significant difference. Discussion: Immediate provisionalization options could move the dip point of ISQ values ahead or delayed around one week, which were also relevant to implant systems. MBL values were proved to be unaffected by both two factors mentioned above.

A prospective cohort study of immediate implantation and delayed implantation for a labial bony dehiscence defect in the maxillary aesthetic area / 口腔疾病防治

Objective @# To investigate the effect of immediate and delayed implant placement on dimensional changes in hard and soft tissues as well as esthetic outcomes. @*Methods @# A total of 40 maxillary single anterior teeth with a dehiscence defect on the labial bone (≤4 mm) were categorized into two groups according to the timing of implant placement: immediate implant placement (n = 20) or delayed implant placement (n = 20). Guided bone regeneration (GBR) was conducted at the sites using a flap approach, and the implants were given immediate provisionalization. Implant survival rates, dimensional changes in hard and soft tissues during the six- and twelve-month follow-ups, and pink esthetic scores (PESs) were measured. @*Results @# The implant survival rates in both groups were 100%, and no complications occurred during the follow-up time. There was no significant difference between the two groups at the measurement sites in the dimensional change of hard and soft tissues during the six- and twelve-month follow-ups. The largest resorption was observed at the implant neck, with a loss of (1.29 ± 0.71) mm in the immediate implant placement group and (1.43 ± 0.19) mm in the delayed implant placement group. The mean PES scores were (10.95 ± 1.51) for the immediate implant placement group and (11.05 ± 1.23) for the delayed implant placement group. @*Conclusion@# Immediate implantation or delayed implantation combined with GBR and immediate provisionalization might both be a prospective treatment strategy for a maxillary single anterior tooth with a dehiscence defect on the labial bone.

Evaluation of Immediate Implantation and Provisionalization Combined with Guided Bone Regeneration by a Flap Approach in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Retrospective Controlled Study.

The aim of this research was too compare the thickness change of labial contour and bone tissues, as well as some biological complications of immediate implantation with and without immediate provisionalization for a single anterior maxilla presenting a vertical defect on labial bone with the need of guided bone regeneration (GBR) by a flap approach. A total of 40 single implants were placed in 40 patients into fresh extraction sockets of the anterior maxilla with a vertical defect on the labial bone (<4 mm). Simultaneously, GBR was conducted at the sites by a flap approach, and the implants were given immediate or delayed provisionalization. The thickness change of bone tissues during six-month evaluation and labial contour during three and six-month follow-up were measured. Complications such as implant and restoration survival rates, infection as well as wound exposure were also evaluated at six months postoperatively. After six months, the mean thickness losses in labial bone were 0.9040, 0.8050, 0.7165, 0.5285 and 0.5335 mm at five different sites in immediate provisionalization group, and 0.8780, 0.8605, 0.7560, 0.5900 and 0.6300 mm, respectively, in delayed provisionalization group, showing no significant difference between the groups at all measurement sites. Although the labial contour changes of the two groups were similar at most sites, the values at 1 and 2 mm above the implant neck remained significantly lower in the immediate provisionalization group at three and six months postoperatively. No complications occurred during the follow-up time. Based on the limitation of this study, the immediate implantation combined with GBR, flap operation and immediate provisionalization obtained acceptable outcomes for a single anterior maxilla with vertical defect on the labial bone, but more long-term research with a larger sample are urgently needed in the future.

El reto del abordaje quirúrgico en la rehabilitación sobre un implante unitario en un caso de alto requerimiento estético del sector anterior. Descripción a propósito de un caso / The challenge of the surgical approach in the rehabilitation of a unitary implant in a case of high aesthetic requirements of the anterior sector. Case report

Objetivo: Describir de forma detallada el abordaje clínico basado en la evidencia científica actual de un implante postextracción con carga y provisionalización inmediata. Caso clínico: Se presenta el caso de una paciente mujer de 32 años de edad, que acude por presentar una posible fractura radicular del incisivo central superior izquierdo (ICSI), acompañada de la aparición de un absceso periodontal en la región del fondo de vestíbulo de dicho diente. Tras llevar a cabo la exploración clínica y radiológica, se establece que el pronóstico del ICSI es desfavorable para llevar a cabo un tratamiento conservador del mismo. Tras la valoración de las características clínicas del caso presente, el plan de tratamiento se inclinó por la realización de la exodoncia del ICSI con la colocación simultánea de un IOI postextracción y la carga inmediata con una prótesis provisional del mismo. Conclusiones: La rehabilitación sobre implantes en situaciones de pérdida dental en el sector anterior estético y en especial, en pacientes jóvenes, requiere un plan de tratamiento multidisciplinar en cuanto a la extracción del diente y colocación del IOI en la posición tridimensional correcta, existiendo diferentes aspectos a tener en cuenta para ello, especialmente el remanente óseo residual, la posición del margen gingival, así como la preservación y acondicionamiento de los tejidos duros y blandos periimplantarios mediante injertos y un manejo correcto de una prótesis provisional hasta conseguir un perfil de emergencia y contorno gingival ideal antes de la corona definitiva. (AU)

Objective: To describe in detail the clinical approach based on current scientific evidence for a post-extraction implant with immediate loading and provisionalisation. Clinical case: We present the case of a 32-year-old female patient who presented with a possible root fracture of the upper left central incisor (ULCI), accompanied by the appearance of a periodontal abscess in the region of the bottom of the vestibule of said tooth. After carrying out the clinical and radiological examination, it is established that the ULCI prognosis is unfavourable for carrying out conservative treatment of the tooth. After assessing the clinical characteristics of the present case, the chosen treatment plan was to extract the ULCI with the simultaneous placement of a post-extraction osseointegrated implant (OII) and immediate loading of a provisional prosthesis on the implant. Conclusions: Rehabilitation on implants in situations of tooth loss in the aesthetic anterior sector, especially in young patients, requires a multidisciplinary treatment plan in relation to tooth extraction and placement of the OII in the correct three-dimensional position. There are various aspects to be taken into account, particularly the residual remaining bone, the position of the gingival margin, as well as the preservation and conditioning of the peri-implant hard and soft tissues by means of grafts and proper handling of a provisional prosthesis until an ideal emergence profile and gingival contour is achieved before the final crown. (AU)

One-by-one immediate dental implants: A papillae preservation concept for adjacent implants in a compromised periodontal case.

In an immediate implant placement and provisionalization strategy, the esthetic results of multiple adjacent implants can be obtained even with compromised periodontium by implementing the "one-by-one" protocol. Staged extractions of multiple adjacent teeth to maintain soft tissue architecture are a key feature of the technique described.

Hard and soft tissue alterations during the healing stage of immediate implant placement and provisionalization with or without connective tissue graft: A randomized clinical trial.

AIMS: To evaluate the hard and soft tissue alterations of immediately placed and provisionalized implants with or without connective tissue graft (CTG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single unsalvageable maxillary incisors were replaced with immediately placed and provisionalized implants in 42 participants. The patients were randomly assigned to receive simultaneous CTG (test group) and not receive CTG (control group). Digital impression and cone-beam computed tomography images were obtained before extraction and after 6 months. Mid-facial gingival margin migrations, soft tissue contour changes and hard tissue remodelling were analysed and compared between the two groups using three-dimensional superimposition method. RESULTS: Forty participants completed the study. The test group showed significantly less buccal tissue collapse in the area 2-5 mm apical to the gingival margin. In both groups, the mid-facial gingival margin migrated in an apico-palatal direction and the socket void, except for a triangular space in the bucco-coronal region, demonstrated radiographic new bone formation without statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The CTG used with immediate implant placement and provisionalization could compensate for the facial tissue collapse, but it did not benefit maintenance of the mid-facial gingival margin position during the 6-month follow-up. New bone formation observed radiographically can be expected in most areas of the socket void, regardless of CTG use (ChiCTR-1900028494).

Sectional Connective Tissue Technique Combined With an Emergence Profile Provisional for Gingival Margin Stabilization During Immediate Implant Placement: A Case Report With a 2-Year Follow-Up.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known regarding maintaining free gingival margin stability after immediate implant placement. Therefore, we present a sequential technique incorporating a sectional connective tissue graft with an emergence tissue provisional to stabilize the free gingival margin position during immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone. CASE PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old male was referred for assessment and treatment of a failing maxillary right central incisor. Clinical examination revealed poor retentive features, recurrent caries, and exposed endodontic material rendering a poor prognosis for the remaining tooth root system. After comprehensive evaluation, as well as understanding important patient case expectations, a decision was made to remove the existing tooth and place an immediate implant with a staged-provisional approach. To maintain the free gingival mid-facial height, a sectional-connective tissue graft technique was used concurrently with a custom emergence profile provisional to stabilize the gingiva immediately post-implant placement. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing implant replacement of failing anterior maxillary teeth are at risk of esthetic complications. Marginal stability of the facial gingival is an important component of establishing and maintaining the final esthetic outcome. In cases where the initial hard or soft tissue thickness may put the patient at risk, combining soft and hard tissue augmentation with attention to emergence profile provisionalization appears to aid in the initial stability of the buccal free gingival margin. This report details the steps associated with a sectional connective tissue technique combined with emergence profile provisonalization and characterizes the gingival stability up to 2.5 years obtained with this approach.

Current status of immediate implant placement in the aesthetic zone of the anterior teeth / 口腔疾病防治

@#The method of placing an implant immediately into the fresh extraction socket at the same time as tooth extraction has the advantages of reducing the number of operations and the overall treatment time, making full use of the existing bone mass, and resulting in ideal aesthetic effects. However, immediate implant placement also has its own inherent shortcomings. Due to the existence of the extraction socket, it is difficult to close the wound; because the size of the implant does not match the size of the extraction socket, it is difficult to achieve good initial stability, and there is a risk of soft tissue recession. This article reviews the success rate, indications and expansion of immediate implant placement, surgical requirements, complications and the prevention and treatment of anterior teeth in the aesthetic area. A literature review showed that the 5-year success rate of immediate implant placement was over 95%. The indications included intact socket walls, a facial bone wall at least 1 mm in thickness, the presence of thick, soft tissue, the absence of acute infection at the site, and the availability of bone apically and lingually to the socket to provide primary stability. In addition, in recent years, with the improvement of surgical implantation technology and the improvement of bone substitute material performance, immediate implant placement can be used as one of the conventional methods for oral implantation treatment, and its indications have shown a trend toward expansion. Immediate implant placement also has complications, including poor placement of implants and gingival receding that results in poor aesthetic outcomes. In addition, immediate restoration and conventional loading protocols after immediate implant appear to have similar outcomes and result in better aesthetic effects. However, the long-term stability and patient satisfaction after immediate implant placement in terms of soft tissue aesthetics require more research.