Longitudinal Observation of Micromotion upon Loading of Implant-Abutment Connection.

While technological advances have made implants a good treatment option with a good long-term prognosis, peri-implantitis, which results in alveolar bone resorption around implants, has been observed in some cases. Micromotion at the implant abutment connection can cause peri-implantitis. However, the temporal progression of micromotion upon loading remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to longitudinally measure micromotion upon loading application on an implant. Implants with Morse-tapered connections were prepared. Custom titanium abutments were fabricated and tightened onto implant bodies at 35 N. A 100 N vertical load was applied for 200,000 cycles. Micromotion was measured when the load was applied, as was the total implant length and removal torque before and after loading. The micromotion was measured from the position data of the jig of the testing machine during loading. The average removal torque was 30.67 N after 10 min of tightening and 27.95 N after loading, indicating a decrease due to loading. The implant length reduced by 3.6 µm under the load. The average micromotion was 0.018 mm at 2 cycles, 0.016 mm at 100,000 cycles, and 0.0157 mm at 200,000 cycles, indicating implant length reduction under the load but not reaching 0. The micromotion between the implant and abutment under a cyclic load decreased over time but did not completely cease. These results highlight the relationship between micromotion and loading, underscoring the importance of careful monitoring and management to mitigate potential complications, such as peri-implantitis, and ensure optimal performance and durability of the implant.

Comparative Analysis of Internal Tapered Implant-Abutment Connections: Evaluating the Morse Effect.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the Morse effect of different internal tapered implant-abutment connections (ITCs) using a pullout test. Implants with different ITCs were selected: Short (Bicon, USA), G1; Novo Colosso (Medens, Brazil), G2; Epkut (SIN, Brazil), G3; Strong SW (SIN, Brazil), G4; Flash (Conexão, Brazil), G5 and Bone Level (Straumann, Switzerland), G6. The respective CAD files were loaded into the analysis software to measure each ITC's taper angle and implant-abutment contact area. Six implants from each group were embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and the respective universal abutments were fixed using a mallet (G1) or by applying 20 Ncm of torque (G2 to G6). After ten minutes, each abutment's retention screw was removed, and the force necessary for abutment rupture was recorded using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The groups were compared using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Spearman's correlation was used to check the correlation of the taper angle and contacting area with the pullout strength. G1, a no-screw abutment with a 3° taper, and G2, a 10°tapered abutment tightened by 20 Ncm, presented the highest pullout strength (p<.05). The increased taper angle of G4, compared to G3, reduced the Morse effect despite their similar implant-abutment contacting areas (p<0.05). The G5 and G6 abutments loosened after screw removal and did not exhibit pullout resistance. The closer the tapered angle (r=-.958) and the higher the implant-abutment contact area (r=.880), the higher the pullout strength (p<.001). Within the limits of this study, the Morse effect is different among tapered implant-abutment connections. The closer the tapered angle and the higher the interface area, the higher the Morse effect between the abutment and the implant.

Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of a One-Size Implant- Abutment Connection System.

PURPOSE: One-size implant-abutment (OSIA) connection systems have been developed for simplicity of clinical use and for a range of implant diameters. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the rotational load fatigue performance of different implant diameters and abutment platforms of an OSIA connection system. METHODOLOGY: Narrow, regular and wide diameter implants were tested with Regular Base (RB/WB) abutments of an OSIA system (Straumann. BLX). Wide diameter implants were also tested with Wide Base (WB) abutments. This resulted in 4 test groups (n=5): N-RB/WB (Narrow, 3.5mm, RB/WB abutment), R-RB/WB (Regular, 4.0mm, RB/WB abutment), W-RB/WB (Wide, 5.0mm, RB/WB abutment) and W-WB (Wide, 5.0mm, WB abutment). A rotational load fatigue machine applied a sinusoidally varying stress at an angle of 45o, producing an effective bending moment of 35Ncm at a frequency of 10 Hz in air at 20 oC. The number of cycles to failure was recorded. Results were evaluated using ANOVA. Failed specimens were examined with SEM to evaluate the failure mode. Pristine specimens were sectioned to examine the implant-abutment connection. RESULTS: All specimens in the 3 test groups with RB/WB abutments failed within the range of 558,750 cycles to 4,497,619 cycles, while the W-WB test group reached the upper limit of 5 million cycles without failure. Significant difference was found between abutment platforms (P < .001). There were no significant differences found for implant diameters (P =.857). However, with increasing implant diameter, implant fracture was less common and the location of failure was more coronal and consistently at the level of the implant platform for the abutment, and at the screw neck. CONCLUSIONS: For wide diameter implants, WB abutments exhibited a superior fatigue performance than RB/WB abutments, and would be preferred in situations of high mechanical risk. Increasing implant diameter, when used with RB/WB abutments, did not improve fatigue performance due to the one-size prosthetic connection, but failures were less catastrophic, and coronally located, which may be advantageous in managing failures.

Marginal changes at bone-level implants supporting dental prostheses with or without intermediate standardised abutments after 36 months: Randomised controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the changes at marginal bone level at implants restored with screw-retained prosthesis connected directly to the implants or with an intermediate abutment, after 3-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six partially edentulous patients received 72 implants. Each patient received 2 implants and a 2-4-unit screw-retained implant-prosthesis. The test group implants received a screw-retained prosthesis connected directly to the implant shoulder, the control group prosthesis were connected through a 3-mm standardised intermediate abutment. Clinical and radiological data were recorded at baseline and at 6-, 12-, and 36-month follow-up. RESULTS: At 36 months, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.13 ± 0.18 mm for the control group and 0.20 ± 0.24 for the test group, with no significant differences between groups (p > .05). Clinical variables (Probing Pocket Depth, Bleeding on Probing and Plaque Index) at 36 months also showed no significant difference between groups. Minor complications frequency was 6.7% in the control group and 5.3% in test group. None of the groups suffered from mayor complications. Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) showed a General Satisfaction mean score in the control group of 9.40 (SD 0.82) and 9.37 (SD 1.06) in the test group with no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bone-level implants restored with screw-retained partial prostheses with or without intermediate abutments showed similar radiographic and clinical outcomes after 3 years.

Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of an Implant System with an Internal Conical Connection and Microthreads.

PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated the effect of implant geometry and diameter on the rotational load fatigue performance of an implant system with an internal conical connection with microthreads. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Regular (4.2 mm) and wide-diameter (4.8 mm) Astra Tech EV implants with straight (S) and conical (C) geometries were tested with their corresponding titanium abutments, comprising four test groups: 4.2-mm S (Group 1), 4.2-mm C (Group 2), 4.8-mm S (Group 3), and 4.8-mm C (Group 4). Five samples were included in each group. Customized brass implant holders and abutment holders were machined. A rotational load fatigue machine was used to apply a sinusoidally varying load to the implant-abutment interface at an angle of 45 degrees to produce an effective bending moment of 35 Ncm at a frequency of 14 Hz (air temperature: 20°C). The number of cycles to failure was recorded, with the upper limit set at 5 × 106 cycles. Results were analyzed using ANOVA. Failed samples were examined with a scanning electron microscope to evaluate the mode of failure. RESULTS: Of the 20 total samples, 2 failed, with Groups 1 and 2 each reporting one failure. Abutment and abutment screw fracture were observed in the failed sample in Group 1, while implant and abutment screw fracture occurred in the failed sample in Group 2. All wide-diameter implants ran beyond the cut-off without failure, but abutment screw loosening was noted in one sample in Group 3. No significant difference was found between implant groups of different geometries and diameters. Damage to the abutments and the implant internal surface were noted in all failed samples. CONCLUSIONS: While no significant differences were found between the test groups, failures were observed only in the regular-diameter group. The abutment and abutment screw fractured deep within the implant, and the implant fractured below the simulated bone level. These modes of failure may pose a significant clinical challenge during retrieval of these components.

Mechanical stability of posterior implant-supported monolithic zirconia cantilever on titanium-base abutments. An in vitro study.

PURPOSE: Investigate survival and technical complications of two-unit posterior implant-supported cantilever made of monolithic zirconia on titanium-base abutments (Zr-TiB) vs. porcelain-fused-to-metal on castable gold abutments (PFM-GA) using two different implant connections, internal butt-joint (IBJ) and internal conical (IC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight implants (4.3 mm diameter) were divided into four groups (n = 12) to support 2-unit mandibular premolar cantilevers with two different materials (Zr-TiB vs. PFM-GA) and two connection types (IBJ vs. IC). Tested groups were as follows: (1) IBJ/Zr-TiB; (2) IBJ/PFM-GA; (3) IC/Zr-TiB; and (4) IC/PFM-GA. Specimens were thermomechanical aged (1,200,000 cycles, 98 N, 5-55°C) with occlusal axial load on the pontic. Catastrophic and non-catastrophic events were registered, and removal torque values measured before and after aging. Specimens surviving aging were subjected to loading until failure. Survival, total complication rates, torque loss (%), and bending moments were calculated. RESULTS: From 48 specimens, 38 survived aging. Survival rates significantly varied from 16.7% (IC/PFM-GA) to 100% (IBJ/Zr-TiB; IBJ/PFM-GA; IC/Zr-TiB) (p < .01). Internal conical connection revealed significantly higher torque loss (IC/ZrTiB - 67%) compared to internal butt-joint (IBJ/Zr-TiB - 44%; IBJ/PFM-GA - 46%) (p < .01). Bending moments were higher in internal butt-joint connections than in internal conical (p < .05). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Two-unit posterior implant-supported cantilever FDPs replacing mandibular premolars composed of monolithic zirconia on titanium-base abutments demonstrated higher mechanical stability compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal on castable gold abutments in this in vitro study. The internal conical connection combined with porcelain-fused-to-metal on gold abutments revealed a high number of failures; therefore, their clinical use may be considered cautiously for this indication.

SEM Analysis and Micro-CT Evaluation of Four Dental Implants after Three Different Mechanical Requests-In Vitro Study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Implant-supported rehabilitations are an increasingly frequent practice to replace lost teeth. Before clinical application, all implant components should demonstrate suitable durability in laboratory studies, through fatigue tests. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the integrity and wear of implant components using SEM, and to assess the axial displacement of the implant-abutment assembly by Micro-CT, in different implant connections, after three distinct mechanical requests. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four KLOCKNER implants (external connection SK2 and KL; and internal connection VEGA and ESSENTIAL) were submitted to three different mechanical requests: single tightening, multiple tightening, and multiple tightening and cyclic loading (500 N × 100 cycles). A total of 16 samples were evaluated by SEM, by the X-ray Bragg-Brentano method to obtain residual stresses, and scratch tests were realized for each surface and Micro-CT (4 control samples; 4 single tightening; 4 multiple tightening; 4 multiple tightening and cyclic loading). All dental implants were fabricated with commercially pure titanium (grade 3 titanium). Surface topography and axial displacement of abutment into the implant, from each group, were evaluated by SEM and Micro-CT. RESULTS: In the manufacturing state, implants and abutments revealed minor structural changes and minimal damage from the machining process. The application of the tightening torque and loading was decisive in the appearance and increase in contact marks on the faces of the hexagon of the abutment and the implant. Vega has the maximum compressive residual stress and, as a consequence, higher scratch force. The abutment-implant distances in SK2 and KL samples did not show statistically significant differences, for any of the mechanical demands analyzed. In contrast, statistically significant differences were observed in abutment-implant distance in the internal connection implants Vega and Essential. CONCLUSIONS: The application of mechanical compression loads caused deformation and contact marks in all models tested. Only internal connection implants revealed an axial displacement of the abutment into the implant, but at a general level, a clear intrusion of the abutment into the implant could only be confirmed in the Essential model, which obtained its maximal axial displacement with cyclic loading.

Repositioning accuracy of the implant- and abutment-level prosthetic components used in conventional and digital workflows.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the repositioning accuracy of the implant- and abutment-level impression components (impression abutments and implant scan bodies) and implant abutments (with and without anti-rotational hex index); also, to estimate the tightening torque influence on the positional stability of abutments. METHODS: Seven types of prosthetic components (n = 7) [impression pick-up copings (PC), implant scan bodies (ISB), non­hex and hex titanium base implant abutments (TB H and TB NH), multi-unit impression copings (MU PC), multi-unit implant scan bodies (MU ISB), and multi-unit caps (MU C) (Medentika GmbH)] were tested. For repositioning accuracy tests a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) was used. During assembly 15 Ncm torque for all components was applied. After measurement, only hex and non­hex abutments were torqued to 25 Ncm and their coordinates were again recorded to assess torque influence. The procedure was repeated 7 times for each component. Linear and 3D deviations, angulation to the vertical axis, and axial rotation were calculated. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the measurements between the groups. A post-hoc test (Mann-Whitney U test) was used for pairwise comparison to determine the influence of the torque (α=0.05). RESULTS: Implant- and abutment-level components used for digital scans showed different positional discrepancies compared to ones used for conventional impressions and ranged from 10 to 37 µm. Hex abutments demonstrated statistically significantly lower 3D deviations (4.4 ± 7.1 µm) compared to non­hex abutments (8.7 ± 6.1 µm). Torque influence was significantly lower for hex abutments than for non­hex abutments. CONCLUSIONS: Repositioning inaccuracies were found in all implant- and abutment-level impression components (impression abutments and implant scan bodies) and all abutments (with and without anti-rotational hex index) tested. Final tightening of the components could cause further positional discrepancies. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The misfit of the prosthetic components used in conventional and digital workflows stays in the clinically acceptable range. Even when multiple connections and disconnections on the track of the laboratory preparation is needed, it should not have a negative influence for single teeth reconstructions. However, in the complex cases with multiple implants, repetitive repositioning of the prosthetic components may lead to the accumulation of vertical, horizontal and rotational errors leading to the clinical problems with the passive fit of the final framework.

Clinical outcomes of implant- versus abutment-level connection in screw-retained fixed dental prostheses: A 5-year randomized controlled trial.

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the 5 years clinical outcomes associated with implant-level connection (IL) versus abutment-level connection (AL) for implants with an internal conical connection (ICC) supporting a screw-retained fixed partial denture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with 119 implants were randomly allocated to either the AL or IL group. Radiographic (Marginal bone loss) and clinical outcomes (Bleeding on Probing, probing pocket depth, plaque accumulation, incidence of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis as well as prosthetic complications) were collected and compared at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate the differences between groups. RESULTS: Five years after treatment, the MBL change was not significantly different between the groups at any point. The MBL was 0.23 ± 0.64 mm (AL) and 0.23 ± 0.29 mm (IL). The bleeding on Probing was 44% (AL) and 45% (IL) (p = .89). The mean probing depth was 2.91 ± 1.01 mm (AL) and 3.51 ± 0.67 mm (IL). This difference between the groups was statistically significant but clinical insignificant. Presence of plaque was slightly higher (p = .06) in the IL group (34.4%) compared with the AL group (26.3%). The overall technical, biological, and prosthetic complication rates were similar between groups. None of the implants developed peri-implantitis during the entire follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The results of this clinical trial indicated that all clinical and radiographical parameters were clinically comparable between the study groups.

Bonding Strength of Various Luting Agents between Zirconium Dioxide Crowns and Titanium Bonding Bases after Long-Term Artificial Chewing.

The use of hybrid abutment crowns bonded extraorally to a titanium bonding base has aesthetic and biological benefits for the prosthetic rehabilitation of oral implants. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of luting agents between a zirconium dioxide crown and the titanium bonding base on crown/abutment retention and the subsequent durability of the prosthetic superstructure. Fifty-six implant abutment samples, all restored with a lower first premolar zirconium dioxide crown, were used and divided into seven groups (n = 8/group) according to the type of luting agent used: group 1, SpeedCEM Plus; group 2, Panavia SA Cement Universal; group 3, Panavia V5; group 4, RelyX Unicem 2 Automix; group 5, VITA ADIVA IA-Cem; group 6, Ketac CEM; and group 7, Hoffmann's Phosphate Cement. All specimens were subjected to thermomechanical loading (load of 49 N, 5 million chewing cycles and 54.825 thermocycles in water with temperatures of 5 °C and 55 °C). The surviving samples were exposed to a pull-off force until crown debonding from the bonding base. Overall, 55 samples survived the thermomechanical load. Group 2 showed the highest mean pull-off force value (762 N), whereas group 6 showed the lowest mean value (55 N). The differences between the seven groups were statistically significant (ANOVA, p < 0.001). The debonding failure pattern was mainly adhesive and was noticed predominantly at the zirconium dioxide-luting agent interface. Within the scope of the present investigation, it was shown that most of the luting agents are suitable for "cementation" of a zirconium dioxide crown onto a titanium base since the debonding forces are above a recommended value (159 N).

Clinical, Bacterial, and Prosthodontic Parameters After Implant Abutment Disinfection Using Nd:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, Chlorhexidine, and Conventional Steam Before Prosthesis Delivery.

Objective: This 1-year prospective clinical trial was designed to assess the microbial, clinical, radiographic, and prosthetic parameters after disinfection of the implant abutment connection using Er,Cr:YSGG (erbium, chromium-doped: yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet) and Nd:YAG (neodymium-doped yttrium, aluminum, garnet). Materials and methods: All the patients were divided into four groups; Group I: Nd:YAG laser, Group II: Er,Cr:YSGG laser, Group III: 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHx), and Group IV: steam disinfection. Peri-implant parameters assessed included peri-implant bleeding scores (PIBS), peri-implant plaque scores (PIPS), peri-implant pocket depth (PIPD), and crestal bone loss (CBL). The peri-implant plaque samples were acquired to perform microbiological analysis to assess Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia, respectively. All measurements were completed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months postsurgery. Multiple groups were compared with the help of the Bonferroni post-hoc adjustment test (p < 0.01). Logistic regression models were utilized to assess the association between age, oral hygiene practices (brushing and flossing), and duration of implant function. Results: At the baseline level, there were no discernible differences in the peri-implant parameters between the study groups (p > 0.05). At the 6-month (p < 0.01) and 12-month (p < 0.001) follow-ups, all four study groups demonstrated a significant improvement in PIPS and PIBS, with no significant differences between the groups at baseline (p > 0.05). Based on an intergroup comparison, Group I (Nd:YAG) showed a significant decrease in PIBS when compared with the other groups. Group II showed a considerable decrease in PIPD and enhancements in CBL when compared with Groups I, III, and IV (p < 0.01). At the 6- and 12-month follow-up periods, P. gingivalis and T. denticola reduction were found to be statistically higher in Group II, whereas P. gingivalis and T. forsythia mean log CFU/mL were found to be statistically higher in Group I. Conclusions: Nd:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers both outperformed CHx and steam disinfection in terms of clinical, peri-implant, and prosthetic results when used to clean implant abutments.

The mechanical and clinical influences of prosthetic index structure in Morse taper implant-abutment connection: a scoping review.

AIM: The implant-abutment connection is a crucial factor in determining the long-term stability of dental implants. The use of a prosthetic index structure in the Morse taper implant-abutment connection has been proposed as a potential solution to improve the accuracy of this connection. This study aimed to provide a scoping review of the mechanical and clinical effects of the prosthetic index structure in the Morse taper implant-abutment connection. METHODS: A systematic scoping review of articles related to "dental implants," "Morse taper," and "index" was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases, as well as a comprehensive literature search by two independent reviewers. Relevant articles were selected for analysis and discussion, with a specific focus on investigating the impact of prosthetic index structure on the mechanical and clinical aspects of Morse taper implant-abutment connections. RESULTS: Finally, a total of 16 articles that met the inclusion criteria were included for data extraction and review. In vitro studies have demonstrated that the use of a prosthetic index structure in the Morse taper implant-abutment connection can affect stress distribution, biomechanical stability, and reverse torque values, which may reduce stress within cancellous bone and help limit crestal bone resorption. However, retrospective clinical studies have shown that this structure is also associated with a higher risk of mechanical complications, such as abutment fracture and abutment screw loosening. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, the clinical trade-off between preventing crestal bone resorption and mechanical complications must be carefully considered when selecting appropriate abutments. The findings suggest that this structure can improve the accuracy and stability of the implant-abutment connection, but its use should be carefully evaluated in clinical practice.

EPA Consensus Project Paper: The Influence of Prosthetic Factors on the Incidence of Peri-implantitis Around Single Implants: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate how prosthetic factors affect the incidence of peri-implantitis in patients treated with single implant restorations. METHODS: Electronic and manual search of two indexed databases up to April 2023 were conducted, to identify clinical studies reporting on the effect of different prosthetic factors on the incidence of peri-implantitis around single implants and with at least 1 year follow-up. The risk of bias was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist, the ROB2 and the ROBINS-I tools. RESULTS: From the 521 screened articles, 11 studies (1 randomized controlled trial, 7 cross-sectional, 3 retrospective) met the inclusion criteria. Based on three studies, emergence angle⟩30°, convex emergence profile and external connection are associated with a higher incidence of peri-implantitis. Nine studies pertaining to the effect of retention type on the prevalence of peri-implantitis reported conflicting results. Six out of eleven included studies presented some risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence regarding the influence of prosthetic factors on the incidence of peri-implantitis around single implants. Further studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions on this issue.

Survival of Four Conical Implant Abutment Connections After Removal of the Abutment Screw and Simulated Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Comparative Study.

This in vitro study evaluated the mechanical behavior of different conical connection implant systems after abutment screw withdrawal. Four conical connection systems were selected based on different conical half-angles: Ankylos (5.7°), Cowell (7.0°), Straumann (7.5°), and Astra (11.0°). In each system, 5 implants and abutments were used (n = 5). According to the recommended value, each abutment screw was torqued to settle the abutment and then withdrawn through a predesigned hole of the cemented crown. The retentiveness of the abutment was evaluated by the following mechanical testing. All specimens were subjected to cyclic loading of 20-200 N, 30°, and 4-mm off-axis to the implant axis, for 106 cycles. The pullout forces and axial displacements of the abutments were measured. The data of the Cowell system was obtained from our previous work. All groups other than Astra group, in which abutment loosened after abutment screw withdrawal, passed the cyclic loading test. Straumann group demonstrated a significantly lower pullout force (27.4 ± 21.1 N) than Ankylos (160.1 ± 41.4 N) and Cowell (183.7 ± 30.5 N) groups. All groups showed abutment rebound after screw withdrawal except Straumann group. In addition, Ankylos, Cowell, and Straumann groups demonstrated axial displacement after cyclic loading. In terms of the retentiveness of the abutment after abutment screw withdrawal examined in this study, Ankylos and Cowell groups had much higher retentiveness than Straumann group, while Astra group had none. Conical angle could be a key design parameter to make abutment screw withdrawal after conical abutment settlement feasible, but more studies must be conducted for clinical application.

Effect of internal connection type and screw channel angle on the screw stability of anterior implant-supported zirconia crowns.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of implant-abutment connection and screw channel angle on screw stability by comparing a newly introduced and an established connection, before and after cyclic loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants (N = 44) with Torcfit (TF) or Crossfit (CF) connection were divided to be restored with a straight (CFS and TFS) or an angled screw access channel (CFA and TFA) titanium-base abutment (n = 11). CFA and TFA received screw-retained crowns, whereas CFS and TFS received hybrid zirconia abutments and cement-retained crowns. The initial torque value (ITV) of each complex (ITVI ) and removal torque value (RTV) after 24 h (RTVI ) were measured. Screws were replaced with new ones, ITVs were recorded again (ITVF ), and crowns were cyclically loaded (2.4 million cycles, 98 N) to measure RTVs again (RTVF ). Percentage torque loss was calculated. Data were analyzed (α = 0.05). RESULTS: ITVs were similar among groups (p ≥ .089). CF led to higher RTVs (p ≤ .002), while CFS had higher RTVI than CFA (p = .023). After 24 h, CFS had lower percentage torque loss than TF, while CFA had lower percentage torque loss than TFA (p ≤ .011). After cyclic loading, CF led to lower percentage torque (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The implant-abutment connection affected the removal torque values. However, no screw loosening occurred during cyclic loading, which indicated a stable connection for all groups. Screw access channel angle did not affect screw stability after cyclic loading.

Marginal Bone Loss Compared in Internal and External Implant Connections: Retrospective Clinical Study at 6-Years Follow-Up.

The aim of this study was to assess and compare the marginal bone loss between two different categories of implants (Winsix, Biosafin, Ancona, Italy) having the same diameter and belonging to the Torque Type® (TT®) line, in the internal hexagon version (TTi, Group A) and in the external hexagon configuration (TTx, Group B). Patients with one or more straight implants (insertion parallel to the occlusal plane) in the molar and premolar regions in association with tooth extraction at least 4 months prior to implant insertion, who have a fixture diameter of 3.8 mm, who followed up for at least 6 years, and whose radiographic records were available were enrolled in this study. Depending on implant connections (externally or internally), the sample was divided into groups A and B. For externally connected implants (66), the marginal resorption was 1.1 ± 0.17 mm. The subgroup of single and bridge implants showed no statistically significant differences with a marginal bone resorption of 1.07 ± 0.15 mm and 1.1 ± 0.17 mm, respectively. Internally connected implants (69) showed an overall marginal resorption of 0.91 ± 0.17 mm, while the subgroup of single and bridge implants showed resorption of 0.90 ± 0.19 mm and 0.90 ± 0.17 mm, respectively, with no statistically significant differences. According to the obtained results, internally connected implants showed less marginal bone resorption than externally connected implants.

Marginal Bone Level and Clinical Parameter Analysis Comparing External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The goal of this systematic review was to verify the marginal bone loss (MBL) and other clinical parameters comparing external hexagon (EH) and Morse taper (MT) implants when they were evaluated within the same study. The focused question was, "For patients (P) treated with external connection (I) or Morse taper (C) dental implants, were there differences in the marginal bone crest maintenance after at least three months in occlusal function (O)"? As for the inclusion criteria that were considered, they included clinical studies in English that compared the MBL in implants with EH and MT, with follow-up of at least three months, that were published between 2011 and 2022; as for the exclusion criteria, they included publications investigating only one type of connection that analyzed other variables and did not report results for the MBL, reports based on questionnaires, interviews, and case reports/series, systematic reviews, or studies involving patients with a significant health problem (ASA Physical Status 3 and above). The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases were screened, and all of the data obtained were registered in a spreadsheet (Excel®). The Jadad scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. A total of 110 articles were initially identified; 11 were considered for full-text reading. Then, six articles (four RCTs and two prospective studies) met the eligibility criteria and were included in this study. A total of 185 patients (mean age of 59.71) were observed, and the follow-up ranged from 3 months to 36 months. A total of 541 implants were registered (267 EH and 274 MT). The survival rate ranged between 96% and 100% (the average was 97.82%). The MBL was compared among all periods studied; therefore, the common assessment period was the 12-month follow-up, presenting greater MBL for EH than for MT (p < 0.001). A mean MBL of 0.60 mm (95% CI 0.43-0.78) was found after the same period. BoP was reported in 5 studies and plaque index was reported in 4 (2 with more than 30%). Deep PD was observed in three studies. High heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 85.06%). Thus, within the limitation of this review, it was possible to conclude that there is higher bone loss in EH than in MT implants when evaluating and comparing this variable within the same study. However, the results must be carefully interpreted because of this review's limited number of clinical studies, the short assessment period, and the high heterogeneity found.

Physical and mechanical changes on titanium base of three different types of hybrid abutment after cyclic loading.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the physical and mechanical changes in the titanium base of three different hybrid abutment materials after cyclic loading by estimating the post-load reverse torque value (RTV), compressive side fulcrum wear pattern of titanium base, and surface roughness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 dental implants were divided into three groups (n = 8 each): Group Z, LD, and P used zirconia, lithium disilicate, and polyetheretherketone, respectively, for hybrid abutment fabrication. RTV was evaluated after cyclic loading with 50 N for 1.2 × 106 chewing cycles. The compressive sides of the titanium bases were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope, and the roughness of the affected areas was measured using an optical profilometer after loading. Datasets were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Mann-Whitney tests with the Bonferroni correction (α = .05). RESULTS: Twenty-three samples passed the test; one LD sample fractured after 770,474 cycles. Post-load RTV varied significantly depending on the hybrid-abutment material (P = .020). Group P had a significantly higher median of post-load RTVs than group Z (16.5 and 14.3 Ncm, respectively). Groups LD and P showed minor signs of wear, and group Z showed a more pronounced wear pattern. While evaluating compressive side affected area roughness of titanium bases, lower medians were shown in group LD (Ra 0.16 and Rq 0.22 µm) and group P (Ra 0.16 and Rq 0.23 µm) than in group Z (Ra 0.26 and Rq 0.34 µm); significant differences were found only among the unaffected surface and group Z. CONCLUSION: The hybrid abutment material influences the post-load RTV. Group Z had a more pronounced wear pattern on the compressive side of titanium base; however, the surface roughness was not statistically different among the hybrid-abutment groups.

Different Conical Angle Connection of Implant and Abutment Behavior: A Static and Dynamic Load Test and Finite Element Analysis Study.

Dental implants are artificial dental roots anchoring prosthetic restorations to replace natural teeth. Dental implant systems may have different tapered conical connections. Our research focused on the mechanical examination of implant-superstructure connections. Thirty-five samples with 5 different cone angles (24°, 35°, 55°, 75°, and 90°) were tested for static and dynamic loads, carried out by a mechanical fatigue testing machine. Fixing screws were fixed with a torque of 35 Ncm before measurements. For static loading, samples were loaded with a force of 500 N in 20 s. For dynamic loading, the samples were loaded for 15,000 cycles with a force of 250 ± 150 N. In both cases, the compression resulting from load and reverse torque was examined. At the highest compression load of the static tests, a significant difference (p = 0.021) was found for each cone angle group. Following dynamic loading, significant differences (p < 0.001) for the reverse torques of the fixing screw were also shown. Static and dynamic results showed a similar trend: under the same loading conditions, changing the cone angle-which determines the relationship between the implant and the abutment-had led to significant differences in the loosening of the fixing screw. In conclusion, the greater the angle of the implant-superstructure connection, the smaller the screw loosening due to loading, which may have considerable effects on the long-term, safe operation of the dental prosthesis.

Mechanical Resistance of a 2.9-mm-Diameter Dental Implant With a Morse-Taper Implant-Abutment Connection.

Among the complications that can occur at dental implants, the fracture of any implant component is a relatively infrequent but clinically relevant problem. Because of their mechanical characteristics, small diameter implants are at higher risk of such complication. The aim of this laboratory and finite element method (FEM) study was to compare the mechanical behavior of a 2.9- and 3.3-mm-diameter implant with a conical connection under standard static and dynamic conditions, following the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14801:2017. Finite element analysis was performed to compare the stress distribution on the tested implant systems under a 300-N, 30° inclined force. Static tests were performed with a load cell of 2 kN; the force was applied on the experimental samples at 30° with respect to the implant-abutment axis, with an arm of 5.5 mm. Fatigue tests were performed with decreasing loads, at 2-Hz frequency, until 3 specimens survived without any damage after 2 million cycles. The emergence profile of the abutment resulted the most stressed area in finite element analysis, with a maximum stress of 5829 and 5480 MPa for 2.9- and 3.3-mm-diameter implant complex, respectively. The mean maximum load resulted in 360 N for 2.9-mm-diameter and 370 N for 3.3-mm-diameter implants. The fatigue limit was recorded to be 220 and 240 N, respectively. Despite the more favorable results of 3.3-mm-diameter implants, the difference between the tested implants could be considered clinically negligible. This is probably due to the conical design of the implant-abutment connection, which has been reported to present low stress values in the implant neck region, thus increasing the fracture resistance.