Effect of Different Induction Immunosuppression on the Incidence of Infectious Complications after Kidney Transplantation-Single Center Study.

Background/Objectives: Potent immunosuppression lowers the incidence of acute graft rejection but increases the risk of infections. In order to decrease either infectious complications or acute rejection, it is necessary to identify risk groups of patients profiting from personalized induction immunosuppressive treatment. The aim of our analysis was to find whether there were higher incidences of infectious complications after kidney transplantation (KT) in groups with different induction immunosuppressive treatment and also to find independent risk factors for recurrent infections. Materials: We retrospectively evaluated all patients with induction treatment with basiliximab after kidney transplantation from 2014 to 2019 at our center relative to age- and sex-matched controls of patients with thymoglobulin induction immunosuppression. Results: Our study consisted of two groups: basiliximab (39) and thymoglobulin (39). In the thymoglobulin group we observed an increased incidence of recurrent infection in every observed interval; however, acute rejection was seen more often in the basiliximab group. A history of respiratory diseases and thrombocytopenia were identified as independent risk factors for recurrent bacterial infections from the first to sixth month after KT. Decreased eGFR from the first month, infections caused by multi-drug-resistant bacteria, and severe infections (reflected by the need for hospitalization) were identified as independent risk factors for recurrent bacterial infections from the first to the twelfth month after KT. Conclusions: We found that in the group of patients with thymoglobulin induction immunosuppressive treatment, infectious complications occurred significantly more often during the entire monitored period with decreased incidence of acute humoral and cellular rejection occurred more often.

Children Are Not Small Adults: Similarities and Differences in Renal Transplantation Between Adults and Pediatrics.

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for all patients with end-stage kidney disease, including pediatric patients. Graft survival in pediatrics was lagging behind adults, but now is comparable with the adult cohort. Although many of the protocols have been adopted from adults, there are issues unique to pediatrics that one should be aware of to take care of this population. These issues include recipient size consideration, increased incidence of viral infections, problems related to growth, common occurrence of underlying urological issues, and psychosocial issues. This article addresses the similarities and differences in renal transplantation, from preparing a patient for transplant, the transplant process, to post-transplant complications.

The effectiveness and safety of antibody induction immunosuppression in a large cohort of United States pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Data on the potential benefits and risks of induction therapy in pediatric liver transplantation (LT) are limited. This was a retrospective cohort study of 2748 pediatric LT recipients at 26 children's hospitals between January 1, 2006 to May 31, 2017 using data from the pediatric health information system linked to the United Network for Organ Sharing database. The induction regimen was obtained from the pediatric health information system day-by-day pharmacy resource utilization. Cox proportional hazards evaluated the association of induction regimen (none/corticosteroid-only, nondepleting, and depleting) on patient and graft survival. Additional outcomes, including opportunistic infections and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, were studied using multivariable logistic regression. Overall, 64.9% received none/corticosteroid-only induction, whereas 28.1% received nondepleting, 8.3% received depleting, and 2.5% other antibody regimens. Differences in patient characteristics were small, but center practices were heterogeneous. Compared with none/corticosteroid-only induction, nondepleting induction was associated with reduced acute rejection (odd ratio [OR], 0.53; P <.001) but with the increased posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (OR, 1.75; P =.021). Depleting induction was associated with improved graft survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; P =.028) but with increased noncytomegalovirus opportunistic infections (OR, 1.46; P =.046). Depleting induction is underused yet may offer long-term benefits in this large multicenter cohort. Greater consensus guidance in this aspect of pediatric LT care is warranted.

Current perspective of immunomodulators for lung transplant.

Lung transplantation is an effective treatment option for selected patients suffering from end-stage lung disease. More intensive immunosuppression is enforced after lung transplants owing to a greater risk of rejection than after any other solid organ transplants. The commencing of lung transplantation in the modern era was in 1983 when the Toronto Lung Transplant Group executed the first successful lung transplant. A total of 43,785 lung transplants and 1365 heart-lung transplants have been performed from 1 Jan 1988 until 31 Jan 2021. The aim of this review article is to discuss the existing immunosuppressive strategies and emerging agents to prevent acute and chronic rejection in lung transplantation.

The impact of different induction immunosuppression protocols on patient survival, graft survival and acute graft rejection after kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to stratify the immunological risk based on the presence of risk factors using different induction immunosuppressive protocols. BACKGROUND: The path to successful kidney transplantation reflects the accuracy of immunological risk assessment and choice of correct induction and maintenance of immunosuppression to avoid acute kidney rejection. METHODS: We performed a multicentre prospective analysis consisting of patients after kidney transplantation with a 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 152 kidney transplant recipients were included, of whom 100 were males (66.4 %). We divided patients according to the induction immunosuppression as follows: no induction (n = 19), induction with basiliximab (n = 60), and induction with ATG at cumulative doses of 3.5 mg/kg (n = 42) and 6 mg/kg (n = 31). In our study, we demonstrated a shorter survival of patients without induction immunosuppression. In the basiliximab group, the duration of dialysis ≥ 3 years (p = 0.0191), cold ischaemia time ≥ 1,020 minutes or expected delayed graft function (p < 0.0001) are independent risk factors for graft loss (p = 0.0097). CONCLUSIONS: Risk of no induction immunosuppression significantly exceeds the risks associated with its administration and is desirable even in patients at low immunological risk. Induction immunosuppression should be tailored individually and thus differ from patient to patient (Tab. 6, Fig. 1, Ref. 15).

Induction therapy and outcome of proliferative lupus nephritis in the top end of Northern Australia - a single centre study retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Lupus nephritis is a common manifestation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Mycophenolate is recommended by guidelines for induction therapy in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis and nephrotic range proteinuria Class V lupus nephritis. Indigenous Australians suffer disproportionally from systemic lupus erythematosus compared to non-Indigenous Australians (Anstey et al., Aust N Z J Med 23:646-651, 1993; Segasothy et al., Lupus 10:439-444, 2001; Bossingham, Lupus 12:327-331, 2003; Grennan et al., Aust N Z J Med 25:182-183, 1995). METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven class III lupus nephritis, class IV lupus nephritis and class V lupus nephritis with nephrotic range proteinuria from 1st Jan 2010 to 31st Dec 2019 in our institution and examined for the patterns of prescribed induction therapy and clinical outcome. The primary efficacy outcome of interest was the incidence of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) at one-year post diagnosis as defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) guideline. Secondary efficacy outcome was a composite of renal adverse outcome in the follow-up period. Adverse effect outcome of interest was any hospitalisations secondary to infections in the follow-up period. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Categorical variables were summarised using frequencies and percentages and assessed by Fisher's exact test. Time-to-event data was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. Count data were assessed using the Poisson's regression method and expressed as incident rate ratio. RESULTS: Twenty of the 23 patients included in the analysis were managed with mycophenolate induction upfront. Indigenous Australian patients (N = 15), compared to non-Indigenous patients (N = 5) received lower cumulative dose of mycophenolate mofetil over the 24 weeks (375 g vs. 256 g, p < 0.05), had a non-significant lower incidence of complete remission at 12 months (60% vs. 40%, p = 0.617), higher incidence of composite renal adverse outcome (0/5 patients vs. 5/15 patients, p = 0.20) and higher incidence of infection related hospitalisations, (incident rate ratio 3.66, 95% confidence interval 0.89-15.09, p = 0.073). CONCLUSION: Mycophenolate as upfront induction in Indigenous Australian patients were associated with lower incidence of remission and higher incidence of adverse outcomes. These observations bring the safety and efficacy profile of mycophenolate in Indigenous Australians into question.

Induction Strategies in Lung Transplantation: Alemtuzumab vs. Basiliximab a Single-Center Experience.

Background: Induction therapy is used in about 80% of lung transplant centers and is increasing globally. Currently, there are no standards or guidelines for the use of induction therapy. At our institution, we have two induction strategies, basiliximab, and alemtuzumab. The goal of this manuscript is to share our experience and practice since this is an area of controversy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 807 lung transplants performed at our institution between 2011 and 2020. Indications for the use of the basiliximab protocol were as follows: patients over the age of 70 years, history of cancer, hepatitis C virus or human immunodeficiency virus infection history, and cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus (donor positive/ recipient negative). In the absence of these clinical factors, the alemtuzumab protocol was used. Results: 453 patients underwent alemtuzumab induction and 354 patients underwent basiliximab. There were significant differences in delayed chest closure (24.7% alemtuzumab vs 31.4% basiliximab, p = 0.037), grade 3 primary graft dysfunction observed within 72 hours (19.9% alemtuzumab vs 29.9% basiliximab, p = 0.002), postoperative hepatic dysfunction (8.8% alemtuzumab vs 14.7% basiliximab, p = 0.009), acute cellular rejection in first year (39.1% alemtuzumab vs 53.4% basiliximab, p < 0.001). The overall survival rate of the patients with alemtuzumab induction was significantly higher than those of the patients with basiliximab induction (5 years survival rate: 64.1% alemtuzumab vs 52.3%, basiliximab, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed lower 5-year survival for basiliximab induction (HR = 1.41, p = 0.02), recipient cytomegalovirus positive (HR = 1.49, p = 0.01), postoperative hepatic dysfunction (HR = 2.20, p < 0.001), and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (HR = 2.27, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this single center retrospective review, there was a significant difference in survival rates between induction strategies. This outcome may be attributable to differences in recipient characteristics between the groups. However, the Alemtuzumab group experienced less episodes of acute cellular rejection within the first year.

Induction Therapy and Therapeutic Antibodies.

Prevention of allograft rejection is one of the crucial goals in solid organ transplantation to ensure durability of the graft and is chiefly mediated by cellular and humoral pathways targeting cell surface alloantigens. The risk of rejection is highest in the first post-transplant year and wanes with time albeit the risk always exists and varies with the type of organ transplanted. Induction therapies refer to the use of high-intensity immunosuppression in the immediate post-operative period to mitigate the highest risk of rejection. This term encompasses chiefly the use of antibody therapies directed against one of the key pathways in T-cell activation or abrogating effects of circulating alloantibodies. These antibodies carry more potent immunomodulatory effect than maintenance immunosuppressive therapy alone and many of them lead to durable immune cell depletion. A variety of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies have been utilized for use not only for induction therapy, but also for treatment of allograft rejection when it occurs and as components of desensitization therapy before and after transplantation to modulate circulating alloantibodies.

Management strategies and outcomes in renal transplant recipients recovering from COVID-19: A retrospective, multicentre, cohort study.

Background: There is an enormous knowledge gap on management strategies, clinical outcomes, and follow-up after kidney transplantation (KT) in recipients that have recovered from coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Methods: We conducted a multi-center, retrospective analysis in 23 Indian transplant centres between June 26, 2020 to December 1, 2021 on KT recipients who recovered after COVID-19 infections. We analyzed clinical and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (AR) incidence and used cox-proportional modeling to estimate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for predictors of AR. We also performed competing risk analysis. Additional outcome measures included graft loss, all-cause mortality, waiting time from a positive real-time polymerase test (RT-PCR) to KT, laboratory parameters, and quality of life in follow-up. Findings: Among 372 KT which included 38(10·21%) ABO-incompatible, 12(3·22%) sensitized, 64(17·20%) coexisting donors with COVID-19 history and 20 (5·37%) recipients with residual radiographic abnormalities, the incidence of AR was 34 (9·1%) with 1(0·26%) death censored graft loss, and 4(1·07%) all-cause mortality over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 241 (106-350) days. In our cox hazard proportional analysis, absence of oxygen requirement during COVID-19 compared to oxygen need [HR = 0·14(0·03-0·59); p-value = 0·0071], and use of thymoglobulin use compared to other induction strategies [HR = 0·17(0·03-0.95); p-value = 0·044] had a lower risk for AR. Degree of Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DR mismatch had the highest risk of AR [HR = 10.2(1·74-65·83); p-value = 0·011]. With competing risk analysis, with death as a competing event, HLA DR mismatch, and oxygen requirement continued to be associated with AR. Age, gender, obesity, inflammatory markers, dialysis vintage, steroid use, sensitization and ABO-incompatibility have not been associated with a higher risk of AR. The median duration between COVID-19 real time polymerase test negativity to transplant was 88(40-145) days (overall), and ranged from 88(40-137), 65(42-120), 110(49-190), and 127(64-161) days in World Health Organization ordinal scale ≤ 3, 4, 5, and 6-7, respectively. There was no difference in quality of life, tacrolimus levels, blood counts, and mean serum creatinine assessed in patients with a past COVID-19 infection independent of severity. Interpretation: Our findings support that the outcomes of KT after COVID-19 recovery are excellent with absence of COVID-19 sequelae during follow-up. Additionally, there does not seem to be a need for changes in the induction/immunosuppression regimen based on the severity of COVID-19. Funding: Sanofi.

Modification in induction immunosuppression regimens to safely perform kidney transplants amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted organ donation and transplantation across the globe. METHODS: This study analyzed transplant outcomes during the pre-pandemic [PPE, 1/2019-2/2020] and pandemic era [PE, 3/2020-8/2020] based on changes in induction immunosuppression. During PPE, high immunological risk patients received 4-6 mg/kg, moderate risk 2-4 mg/kg, and low risk 1-2 mg/kg of ATG. During PE, ATG doses were reduced to 3-4 mg/kg for high risk, 1-2 mg/kg for moderate, and low changed to basiliximab. Primary outcomes are as follows: biopsy-proven rejection [BPAR], de-novo donor-specific antibody [DSA], delayed graft function [DGF], infection rates, graft loss, and all-cause of mortality. RESULTS: During PPE, 224 kidney transplants [KTx] and 14 kidney/pancreas transplants [KP] were included, while 180 KTx and 5 KP were included for PE. Basiliximab use increased by 30% in the PE. The odds of DGF were statistically significant between PE vs PPE, OR 1.7 [1.05, 2.8, p-value = .042]. The odds of developing DSAs and BPAR during the PE vs. PPE were 0.34 [0.16, 0.71, p-value = .004] and OR 0.34 (0.1 to 1.1, p-value, .104)], respectively. Cytomegalovirus [19% in PE, 37% in PPE] and BK virus [5.4% PE vs. 16% PPE] incidence reduced during PE vs. PPE. COVID-19, graft loss, and mortality were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: KTx and KP transplants were performed safely during the COVID-19 pandemic with a reduction of induction immunosuppression.

Low-Dose Antithymocyte Globulin Has No Disadvantages to Standard Higher Dose in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: Report From the Pediatric Nephrology Research Consortium.

INTRODUCTION: Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) dosing strategies for induction in pediatric kidney transplantation vary between centers. It is not known whether a lower rATG induction dose provides safe and effective immunosuppression compared with a "standard" higher dose. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of all isolated first-time kidney transplant recipients <21 years old who received rATG induction between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014 at 9 pediatric centers. An a priori cutoff of a 4.5-mg/kg cumulative rATG dose was used to identify low (≤ 4.5 mg/kg) and standard (> 4.5 mg/kg) exposure groups. Outcomes examined included 12 months posttransplant graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]); the occurrence of acute rejection, donor-specific antibody (DSA), neutropenia, and viral infection (cytomegalovirus [CMV], Epstein-Barr virus [EBV], and BK virus); and 24-month outcomes of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurrence and patient and graft survival. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-five patients were included. Baseline features of the low and standard rATG dose groups were similar. By 12 months, the rATG dose group had no significant impact on the occurrence of neutropenia, positive DSA, or viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Graft function was similar. Acute rejection rates were similar at 17% (low dose) versus 19% (standard dose) (P = 0.13). By 24 months, graft survival (96.4% vs. 94.6%) and patient survival (100% vs. 99.3%) were similar between the low- and standard-dose groups (P = 0.54 and 0.46), whereas the occurrence of PTLD trended higher in the standard-dose group (0% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: A low rATG induction dose ≤ 4.5 mg/kg provided safe and effective outcomes in this multicenter low immunologic risk pediatric cohort. Prospective studies are warranted to define the optimal rATG induction dose in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Nationwide variability in the use of induction immunosuppression for adult heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Institutional factors have been shown to impact outcomes following orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). This study evaluated center variability in the utilization of induction therapy for OHT and its implications on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Adult OHT patients between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. Transplant centers were stratified based on their rates of induction therapy utilization. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were created with drug-treated rejection within 1 year as primary endpoint and individual centers as a random parameter. Risk-adjusted Cox regression was used to evaluate patient-level mortality outcomes. RESULTS: In 17,524 OHTs performed at 100 centers, induction therapy was utilized in 48.6% (n = 8411) with substantial variability between centers (interquartile range, 21.4%-79.1%). There were 36, 30, and 34 centers in the low (<29%), intermediate (29%-66%), and high (>67%) induction utilization terciles groups, respectively. Induction therapy did not account for the observed variability in the treated rejection rate at 1 year among centers after adjusting for donor and recipient factors (p = .20). No differences were observed in postoperative outcomes among induction utilization centers groups (all, p > .05). Furthermore, there was a weak correlation between the percentage of induction therapy utilization at the center-level and recipients found to have moderate (r = .03) or high (r = .04) baseline risks for acute rejection at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates that there is substantial variability in the use of induction therapy among OHT centers. In addition, there was a minimal correlation with baseline recipient risk or 1-year rejection rates, suggesting a need for better-standardized practices for induction therapy use in OHT.

Economic impacts of alternative kidney transplant immunosuppression: A national cohort study.

Understanding the economic implications of induction and maintenance immunosuppression (ISx) is important in developing personalized kidney transplant (KTx) care. Using data from a novel integrated data set including financial records from the University Health System Consortium, Medicare, and pharmacy claims (2007-2014), we estimated the differences in the impact of induction and maintenance ISx regimens on transplant hospitalization costs and Medicare payments from KTx to 3 years. Use of thymoglobulin (TMG) significantly increased transplant hospitalization costs ($12 006; P = .02), compared with alemtuzumab and basiliximab. TMG resulted in lower Medicare payments in posttransplant years 1 (-$2058; P = .05) and 2 (-$1784; P = .048). Patients on steroid-sparing ISx incurred relatively lower total Medicare spending (-$10 880; P = .01) compared with patients on triple therapy (tacrolimus, antimetabolite, and steroids). MPA/AZA-sparing, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors-based, and cyclosporine-based maintenance ISx regimens were associated with significantly higher payments. Alternative ISx regimens were associated with different KTx hospitalization costs and longer-term payments. Future studies of clinical efficacy should also consider cost impacts to define the economic effectiveness of alternative ISx regimens.

Lymphocyte-depleting induction therapy lowers the risk of acute rejection in African American pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

The use of lymphocyte-depleting induction immunosuppression has been associated with a reduction in risk of AR after KT among adult recipients, particularly among high-risk subgroups such as AAs. However, data on induction regimen and AR risk are lacking among pediatric KT recipients. We examined outcomes among 7884 first-time pediatric KT recipients using SRTR data (2000-2014). Characteristics were compared across race using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Risk of AR was estimated using modified Poisson regression, stratified by recipient race, adjusting for recipient age, gender, BMI, primary diagnosis, number of HLA mismatches, maintenance immunosuppression, and donor type. Risk of AR within 1 year was lower in AA recipients receiving lymphocyte-depleting induction (ATG or alemtuzumab; RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.83 P < .001) compared to AA recipients receiving anti-IL-2 receptor antibody induction. This difference was not seen in non-AA recipients receiving lymphocyte-depleting induction (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81-1.06, P = .26) compared to IL-2 induction. These findings support a role for lymphocyte-depleting induction agents in AA pediatric patients undergoing KT and continued use of IL-2 inhibitor induction in non-AA pediatric KT recipients.

Comparación de resultados entre el retrasplante y el trasplante renal primario en el Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras de 1984 a 2012 / Comparison of results between retransplantation and primary kidney transplantation on Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital from 1984 to 2012

Introducción: el retrasplante constituye la mejor opción terapéutica para los enfermos que pierden un primer trasplante renal y vuelven a diálisis, existen disímiles criterios en cuanto a sus resultados al compararlos con los trasplantes renales primarios. Objetivo: analizar el porcentaje de retrasplantes, revisar la supervivencia del injerto y del enfermo, el comportamiento de variables que pueden incidir en los resultados y compararlos con los de los enfermos que reciben un primer trasplante renal. Métodos: se realizó un estudio analítico, descriptivo, retrospectivo, de los trasplante renales realizados en el Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras desde 1984 hasta diciembre de 2012; quedaron excluidos, los terceros trasplante, dobles (2 riñones a un mismo receptor), combinados (páncreas-riñón e hígado-riñón) y aquellos en los que no fue posible obtener la información requerida para la investigación. Se compararon (entre los grupos retrasplantes y primeros trasplantes) variables de índole general: edad de los receptores y donantes, sexo del receptor, enfermedad que ocasionó la insuficiencia renal, porcentaje de reactividad ante un panel de linfocito (PRA), compatibilidades HLA, tipo de donante (vivo o cadáver), tiempos de isquemia, presencia y duración de necrosis tubular aguda (donante cadáver), rechazo y supervivencia del injerto y el paciente. Resultados: los retrasplantes constituyeron el 5,4 por ciento de la muestra. No existieron diferencias entre edades, sexo, PRA, compatibilidades ni tipo de donante entre los segundos y primeros injertos...

Introduction: retransplant constitutes the best therapeutic choice for patients who lose a first renal transplant and return to dialysis, existing dissimilar criteria as to its results when ranking them with renal primary transplant. Objective: to analyze the percentage of retransplantation, to revise graft and patient survival, to review the behavior of variables that can affect the results and to compare them with patients receiving a first renal transplant. Methods: an analytic, descriptive, retrospective study was accomplished, including all renal transplant performed at the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital from 1984 to December of 2012. Third transplants, double transplants (two kidneys to the same receptor), combined transplants (pancreas-kidney and liver-kidney) and those where it was not possible to obtain the information required for this research were excluded. Variables of general nature were compared between retransplantation groups and first transplants, such as: age of recipient and donor, sex of the recipient, a disease that caused kidney failure, percentage of reactivity to a lymphocyte panel (PRA), HLA compatibility, donor type (living or dead), ischemia time, presence and duration of acute tubular necrosis (dead donor), rejection and graft and patient survival. Results:rRetransplant constituted only 5.4 percent of the sample (34 patients). There were no differences in age, sex, PRA, donor type or compatibilities between the second and first grafts...

Comparación de resultados entre el retrasplante y el trasplante renal primario en el Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras de 1984 a 2012 / Comparison of results between retransplantation and primary kidney transplantation on Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital from 1984 to 2012

Introducción: el retrasplante constituye la mejor opción terapéutica para los enfermos que pierden un primer trasplante renal y vuelven a diálisis, existen disímiles criterios en cuanto a sus resultados al compararlos con los trasplantes renales primarios. Objetivo: analizar el porcentaje de retrasplantes, revisar la supervivencia del injerto y del enfermo, el comportamiento de variables que pueden incidir en los resultados y compararlos con los de los enfermos que reciben un primer trasplante renal. Métodos: se realizó un estudio analítico, descriptivo, retrospectivo, de los trasplante renales realizados en el Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras desde 1984 hasta diciembre de 2012; quedaron excluidos, los terceros trasplante, dobles (2 riñones a un mismo receptor), combinados (páncreas-riñón e hígado-riñón) y aquellos en los que no fue posible obtener la información requerida para la investigación. Se compararon (entre los grupos retrasplantes y primeros trasplantes) variables de índole general: edad de los receptores y donantes, sexo del receptor, enfermedad que ocasionó la insuficiencia renal, porcentaje de reactividad ante un panel de linfocito (PRA), compatibilidades HLA, tipo de donante (vivo o cadáver), tiempos de isquemia, presencia y duración de necrosis tubular aguda (donante cadáver), rechazo y supervivencia del injerto y el paciente. Resultados: los retrasplantes constituyeron el 5,4 por ciento de la muestra. No existieron diferencias entre edades, sexo, PRA, compatibilidades ni tipo de donante entre los segundos y primeros injertos. Los enfermos que llegaron a la insuficiencia renal por riñones poliquísticos nunca han recibido en nuestro centro un segundo trasplante. Resultó significativamente estadístico el uso de terapia cuádruple secuencial como inmunosupresión de inducción en los retrasplantes (55,9 por ciento vs. 9,7 por ciento de los primarios...

Introduction: retransplant constitutes the best therapeutic choice for patients who lose a first renal transplant and return to dialysis, existing dissimilar criteria as to its results when ranking them with renal primary transplant. Objective: to analyze the percentage of retransplantation, to revise graft and patient survival, to review the behavior of variables that can affect the results and to compare them with patients receiving a first renal transplant. Methods: an analytic, descriptive, retrospective study was accomplished, including all renal transplant performed at the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital from 1984 to December of 2012. Third transplants, double transplants (two kidneys to the same receptor), combined transplants (pancreas-kidney and liver-kidney) and those where it was not possible to obtain the information required for this research were excluded. Variables of general nature were compared between retransplantation groups and first transplants, such as: age of recipient and donor, sex of the recipient, a disease that caused kidney failure, percentage of reactivity to a lymphocyte panel (PRA), HLA compatibility, donor type (living or dead), ischemia time, presence and duration of acute tubular necrosis (dead donor), rejection and graft and patient survival. Results:rRetransplant constituted only 5.4 percent of the sample (34 patients). There were no differences in age, sex, PRA, donor type or compatibilities between the second and first grafts. Patients who reached the renal failure due to polycystic kidneys have never had a second transplant in our institution. The use of sequential quadruple therapy as induction immunosuppression, retransplantation (55.9 percent vs. 9.7 percent of primary) was statistically significant...

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of rabbit ATG in the prophylaxis of acute rejection in lung transplantation.

ATG-Fresenius S (ATG-F) is a polyclonal anti-human-T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin preparation that has been clinically developed to prevent episodes of acute cellular rejection. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ATG-F at doses of 5 and 9 mg/kg versus placebo in adult recipients of a primary lung allograft. The primary efficacy composite end point was defined as death, graft loss, acute rejection and/or loss to follow-up within 12 months of transplantation. The interim analysis showed the ATG-F 5 mg/kg treatment to be inefficacious, and it would be impossible to enroll enough patients to power the study to show a difference between the 9 mg/kg arm and the placebo arm. Therefore, the main focus of the study shifted to the safety end points and a descriptive analysis of the primary end point. At 12 months posttransplant, the efficacy failure rate was not significantly different between the ATG-F 9 mg/kg group and the placebo group (40.2% vs. 36.7%, respectively). This large study did not demonstrate a significant reduction in acute cellular rejection, graft loss or death with single-dose induction therapy with ATG-F within the first year after lung transplantation.

Excessive immunosuppression as a potential cause of poor survival in simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation for hepatitis C.

Appropriate recipient selection of simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation (SLKT) remains controversial. In particular, data on liver graft survival in hepatitis C virus-infected (HCV+) SLKT recipients are lacking. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of HCV+ SLKT recipients (N = 25) in comparison with HCV- SLKT (N = 26) and HCV+ liver transplantation alone (LTA, N = 296). Despite backgrounds of HCV+ and HCV- SLKT being similar, HCV+ SLKT demonstrated significantly impaired 5-year liver graft survival of 35% (HCV- SLKT, 79%, P = 0.004). Compared with HCV+ LTA, induction immunosuppression was more frequently used in HCV+ SLKT. Five-year liver graft survival rate for HCV+ SLKT was significantly lower than that for LTA (35% vs. 74%, respectively, P < 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratio of liver graft loss in HCV+ SLKT was 4.9 (95% confidence interval 2.0-12.1, P = 0.001). HCV+ SLKT recipients were more likely to succumb to recurrent HCV and sepsis compared with LTA (32% vs. 8.8%, P < 0.001 and 24% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.030, respectively). Ten HCV+ SLKT recipients underwent anti-HCV therapy for recurrent HCV; only 1 achieved sustained virological response. HCV+ SLKT is associated with significantly decreased long-term prognosis compared with HCV- SLKT and HCV+ LTA.

Role for immune monitoring to tailor induction prophylaxis in pediatric heart recipients.

UNLABELLED: rATG is used for HTx induction but is costly and associated with infection and PTLD. HYPOTHESIS: Tailoring rATG induction with CD3 monitoring results in less infection, reduced costs, and similar rejection. Retrospective review of HTx recipients receiving rATG induction. Control cases received "usual" rATG dosing (1.5 mg/kg/day typically × 5 days). Starting in October 2009, absolute CD3 monitoring (target <25 cells/mm(3) ) guided rATG dosing (study cases). Outcomes included first-year incidence of infection/rejection, direct costs of therapy, and incidence of PTLD/death. Study cases (n = 32) received fewer doses of rATG (median 4 vs. 5, p < 0.001) and less total rATG (median 3.2 vs. 7.4 mg/kg, p < 0.001) compared with controls (n = 17). There was no difference in incidence of infection, rejection, or patient survival during the first year post-HTx. There was one early death in both groups and one late case of PTLD in the control group. Drug savings were significant (median drug cost per patient $2718 vs. $4756, p < 0.001). CD3-tailored rATG induction in HTx recipients is associated with reduced drug costs and similar rates of rejection/infection. Longer follow-up will determine whether extended benefits are associated with this induction monitoring strategy.

Past, present, and future prospects for inducing donor-specific transplantation tolerance for composite tissue allotransplantation.

Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is among the most immunologically complex and newest transplant fields. Although the field has made considerable advances, there are still concerns that these procedures are performed to enhance quality-of-life issues and are not lifesaving procedures that restore physiologic function. Two challenges limit the widespread application of CTA; the first is chronic rejection, the most prevailing cause of organ allograft failure after transplantation; the second barrier is the numerous health complications associated with lifelong immunosuppressive therapy. Several tolerance-inducing strategies, including costimulatory blockade, T-cell depletion, mixed chimerism, and gene targeting of transplanted organs, have the potential to induce lifelong tolerance to organ allografts without chronic immunosuppression. Effective clinical tolerance protocols that improve CTA acceptance and offer an alternative to the requirement for chronic immunosuppressive therapy could be a major advance in the field. Tolerance would allow allotransplantation to provide a currently unmet need for reconstruction of large tissue defects. This article reviews the history of CTA, current challenges and complications, and offers future directions for CTA research in strategies to induce tolerance.