Efficacy of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Alone Versus Combination With Suprascapular Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Surgeries: A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial.

Background and aim The regional anesthesia technique is commonly used for upper extremity surgery as an alternative to general anesthesia. The study aimed to compare the efficacy of infraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) and a combination of infraclavicular brachial plexus block with suprascapular nerve block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing shoulder surgeries. Method A total of 62 patients of both sexes with the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II/III, aged between 18 and 65 years, and undergoing shoulder surgery, were included in this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients were equally allocated into two groups: 31 in group A and 31 in group B. After pre-anesthetic evaluation, the purpose and protocol of the study were explained to patients, and informed consent was obtained. Thirty-one patients in group A were given infraclavicular brachial plexus block using 30 ml 0.375% bupivacaine while 31 patients in group B were given a combination of infraclavicular brachial plexus block using 30 ml 0.375% bupivacaine and suprascapular nerve block using 5 ml 0.375% bupivacaine. Blocks were given using ultrasound guidance and a peripheral nerve stimulator; the suprascapular block was given in the sitting position while the infraclavicular block was provided in the supine position. General anesthesia was administered in the operation theatre in the supine position after the administration of blocks. The pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the satisfaction score was assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS). The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for comparison of pain between the two groups. The chi-square test was utilized for comparing the categorical variables. Result The postoperative pain was significantly lower (p<0.001) in group B as compared to group A at all the periods of observation, i.e., 0h (2.77±0.72 vs. 5.42±0.77), 6h (3.89±0.70 vs. 5.94±0.73), 12h (5.66±0.93 vs. 6.58±0.88), and 24h (6.16±0.80 vs. 6.74±0.90). These findings illustrate that group B patients who received a combination of infraclavicular brachial plexus block and suprascapular nerve block for shoulder surgeries had better pain relief than group A patients who received only the infraclavicular approach. The mean NRS score of patient satisfaction in group B (7.26±0.58) was significantly higher (p<0.001) in comparison to group A (6.16±0.64). Diaphragmatic palsy was observed in only one case in group A and none in group B. No other complication was observed in any of the patients during the study period. Conclusion The combination of infraclavicular brachial plexus block and suprascapular nerve block displays a positive postoperative analgesic profile with less usage of rescue analgesic doses and better patient satisfaction after shoulder surgery.

Ultrasound-guided Retroclavicular Approach Versus Costoclavicular Approach of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia for an upper limb provides many advantages over general anesthesia, especially in orthopedic surgery. OBJECTIVES: This trial aimed to compare a retroclavicular approach to the infraclavicular brachial plexus with a costoclavicular approach in term of needle time, image time, and procedure time, and comparing both with the classic technique for upper limb surgeries guided by ultrasound. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial. SETTING: Minia University, Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department. METHODS: Sixty patients of both sees with an American Society of Anesthesiologists  Classification of I and II, a BMI (kg/m2) of 20-35, aged from 18-60 years who were scheduled for a forearm or hand surgery under infraclavicular brachial plexus block were divided into 3 parallel equal groups. Group I (RC) received a retroclavicular approach.  Group II (CC)received a costoclavicular approach.  Group III (CT) received the classic technique. Procedure time, the sum of the imaging and needling times, was our primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the motor and sensory block success rate 30 minutes postinjection of local anesthesia, duration of motor and sensory block, Visual Analog Score, first analgesic need, total analgesia requirements during the first postoperative 24 hours, and any complications. RESULTS: The procedure and needle times were significantly decreased in the retroclavicular group due to better needle visibility. There was no significant difference regarding sensory and motor block data. The VAS score in the first postoperative 24 hours showed no statistical significance. Regarding analgesic data and patient satisfaction, there was no statistical significance among the 3 studied groups. There were no complications in any of the used approaches. LIMITATION: Our trial did not include patients with a BMI > 35. CONCLUSIONS: The retroclavicular approach is superior because of its decreased procedure time and needle time than both the costoclavicular approach and classic approach.

Retrospective Analysis of 0.25% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular and Supraclavicular Nerve Blocks in an Ambulatory Surgery Center.

Bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% (5 mg/mL) is commonly utilized for analgesia in brachial plexus blocks. We suggest that ultrasound-guided 0.25% (2.5 mg/mL) bupivacaine can be utilized for effective postoperative analgesia to reduce the effective dose. A total of 126 patients underwent ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks with 0.25% bupivacaine. The mean duration of analgesia was 21.95 (σ = 3.93) hours with no complications. Patients that received an infraclavicular block (22.56 σ = 4.02) had a significant increase in analgesia compared to supraclavicular blocks (21.09, σ = 3.69) (p = 0.04). These results suggest that further research is warranted for ultrasound-guided 0.25% bupivacaine in brachial plexus nerve blocks.

A Case of Late-Onset Local Anesthetic Toxicity Observed as Seizure Activity.

Most of the local anesthetic toxicity cases develop within the first five minutes of peripheral block administration. Late local anesthetic toxicity has been rarely reported in the literature. However, it is an important life-threatening problem that can lead to seizures, hemodynamic collapse, and cardiac arrest if it is ignored and not considered. Here we present the case of an 18-year-old male patient who had ultrasonography-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block administration with a 30 mL local anesthetic. The patient had convulsions 210 minutes after the block administration and was treated with intravenous diazepam. Intraoperative and postoperative courses were uneventful. He had no neurologic signs or symptoms afterward. All laboratory tests and radiologic investigation tests were normal. This report demonstrates that late local anesthetic toxicity is still possible after several hours of the uneventful peripheral neural blockade, although it is rarely reported.

Comparison of Perineural and Intravenous Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A prospective Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of perineural versus intravenous (i.v.) dexamethasone (4 mg) when added to levobupivacaine as an adjuvant has not been well studied. AIMS: This study was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy of perineural and i.v. dexamethasone as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in infraclavicular brachial plexus (ICBP) block. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 68 patients with the ultrasound-guided ICBP block, randomly allocated into two groups (34 each). Four patients had failed block (2 in each group) that was excluded from the study. Group A received 25 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% and 1 mL of normal saline for the block and i.v. dexamethasone 4 mg. Group B received 25 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% with 4 mg of perineural dexamethasone for the block. Postoperative vitals and different block characteristics were assessed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Student's independent sample t-test and Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The duration of motor block and analgesia in Group A was 1245.94 ± 153.22 min and 1310.16 ± 151.68 min, respectively. However, in Group B, the duration of motor block and analgesia was 1768.13 ± 309.86 min and 1743.59 ± 231.39 min, respectively, which was more when compared to Group A (P < 0.001). The Visual Analog Scale score of ≥3 in Group A was 37% and in Group B was 9% (P = 0.008). Four cases had delayed regression of motor block in the perineural group. CONCLUSIONS: Perineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged the duration of motor block promoted by levobupivacaine in infraclavicular brachial plexus block, reduced pain intensity and rescue analgesia needs in the postoperative period when compared with the intravenous dexamethasone.

Minimum effective volume of bupivacaine 0. 5% for ultrasound-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block / Volume mínimo efetivo de bupivacaína a 0, 5% para abordagem retroclavicular guiada por ultrassom no bloqueio do plexo braquial por via infraclavicular

Abstract Background and objectives: The current study aimed to determine the minimum effective volume (MEV) of bupivacaine 0.5% in 50% of patients for an ultrasound-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods: A total of 25 adult patients who were scheduled for upper limb surgery received an ultrasound-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block with bupivacaine 0.5%. The needle insertion point was posterior to the clavicle and the needle was advanced from cephalad to caudal. Block success was defined as a composite score of 14 at 30 min after local anesthetic (LA) injection. The minimum effective volume in 50% of patients was determined using the Dixon-Massey up-and-down staircase method. Minimum effective volume for a successful block in 95% of the patients was also calculated using logistic regression and probit transformation. Results: The minimum effective volume of bupivacaine 0.5% resulting in successful block in 50% of patients (MEV50) according to the up-and-down staircase method was found to be 9.6 mL (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.7-13.4). The calculated minimum effective volume required for a successful block in 95% of patients (MEV95) using the probit transformation and logistic regression analysis was 23.2 mL (95% CI, 18.8-36.7). Conclusions: The MEV50 of bupivacaine 0.5% for US-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block was 9.6 mL and the calculated MEV95 was 23.2 mL. Future studies are required for infraclavicular brachial plexus block with different approaches, other LA agents and different concentrations of bupivacaine.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Determinar o volume mínimo efetivo (VE) de bupivacaína a 0,5% em 50% dos pacientes para uma abordagem retroclavicular guiada por ultrassom no bloqueio do plexo braquial por via infraclavicular. Métodos: Um total de 25 pacientes adultos agendados para cirurgia do membro superior receberam abordagem retroclavicular guiada por ultrassom para o bloqueio do plexo braquial por via infraclavicular com bupivacaína a 0,5%. O ponto de inserção da agulha foi posterior à clavícula e a agulha foi avançada de cefálica para caudal. O sucesso do bloqueio foi definido como um escore composto de 14 aos 30 min após a injeção do anestésico local. O VE em 50% dos pacientes foi determinado com o método de escalonamento progressivo-regressivo de Dixon-Massey. O VE para um bloqueio bem-sucedido em 95% dos pacientes também foi calculado com regressão logística e transformação probit. Resultados: O volume mínimo efetivo (VE50) de bupivacaína a 0,5% que resultou em bloqueio bem-sucedido em 50% dos pacientes, de acordo com o método de escalonamento progressivo-regressivo, foi de 9,6 ml (intervalo de confiança de 95%, IC 5,7-13,4). O cálculo do volume mínimo efetivo necessário para um bloqueio bem-sucedido em 95% dos pacientes (VE95) com a análise de transformação probit e regressão logística foi de 23,2 ml (IC 95%, 18,8-36,7). Conclusões: O VE50 de bupivacaína a 0,5% para abordagem retroclavicular guiada por US para o bloqueio do plexo braquial por via infraclavicular foi de 9,6 ml e o VE95 calculado foi de 23,2 ml. Estudos futuros são necessários para o bloqueio do plexo braquial por via infraclavicular com diferentes abordagens, outros anestésicos locais e diferentes concentrações de bupivacaína.

[Minimum effective volume of bupivacaine 0.5% for ultrasound-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block]. / Volume mínimo efetivo de bupivacaína a 0,5% para abordagem retroclavicular guiada por ultrassom no bloqueio do plexo braquial por via infraclavicular.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to determine the minimum effective volume (MEV) of bupivacaine 0.5% in 50% of patients for an ultrasound-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block. METHODS: A total of 25 adult patients who were scheduled for upper limb surgery received an ultrasound-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block with bupivacaine 0.5%. The needle insertion point was posterior to the clavicle and the needle was advanced from cephalad to caudal. Block success was defined as a composite score of 14 at 30min after local anesthetic (LA) injection. The minimum effective volume in 50% of patients was determined using the Dixon-Massey up-and-down staircase method. Minimum effective volume for a successful block in 95% of the patients was also calculated using logistic regression and probit transformation. RESULTS: The minimum effective volume of bupivacaine 0.5% resulting in successful block in 50% of patients (MEV50) according to the up-and-down staircase method was found to be 9.6mL (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.7-13.4). The calculated minimum effective volume required for a successful block in 95% of patients (MEV95) using the probit transformation and logistic regression analysis was 23.2mL (95% CI, 18.8-36.7). CONCLUSIONS: The MEV50 of bupivacaine 0.5% for US-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block was 9.6mL and the calculated MEV95 was 23.2mL. Future studies are required for infraclavicular brachial plexus block with different approaches, other LA agents and different concentrations of bupivacaine.

Effect of a lateral infraclavicular brachial plexus block on the axillary and suprascapular nerves as determined by electromyography - a cohort study.

We aimed to examine to what extent a lateral infraclavicular brachial plexus block affected the axillary and the suprascapular nerve. We included patients undergoing hand surgery anaesthetised with a lateral infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Our primary outcome was the relative change in surface electromyography during maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the medial deltoid muscle (axillary nerve) and the infraspinatus muscle (suprascapular nerve) from baseline to 30 min after the block procedure. A reduction in electromyography of > 50% defined a successful block. The impact of the block on the shoulder nerves was compared with the surgical target nerves of the arm and hand (musculocutaneous, radial, median and ulnar nerves). Twenty patients were included. The medians of the relative changes in the surface electromyography were significantly reduced (both p < 0.001) with 92% for the deltoid muscle and 30% for the infraspinatus muscle, respectively. In total, 18 out of 20 patients had reductions > 50% for the deltoid muscle, which was significantly different from the infraspinatus muscle, where the proportion was 5 out of 20 (p < 0.001). The medians of the relative reductions in electromyography for the arm and hand muscles were 90-96%, similar to the effect on the deltoid muscle. Our results suggest that a lateral infraclavicular block provides block of the axillary nerve comparable to the block of the surgical target nerves. The suprascapular nerve is blocked to a lesser degree. Combining a lateral infraclavicular brachial plexus block with a selective suprascapular block for shoulder surgery warrants further studies.

Comparison of the anesthetic effects between ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block via costoclavicular approach and ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block via coracoid approach in operations of forearm and hand / 临床麻醉学杂志

Objective To compare the effectiveness between ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block via costoclavicular approach and ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block via cora-coid approach.Methods Fifty-eight patients scheduled for forearm or hand surgery,33 males and 25 females,aged 18-70 years,ASA physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ,were selected in this study.The patients were equally randomized into two groups:the group of brachial plexus block via costoclavicular approach (group A)and group of infraclavicular brachial plexus block via coracoid approach (group B).0.5 % ropivacaine 20 ml was used for local anesthetic.The anatomic depth of brachial plexus nerve,nerve block operation time,sensory and motor blockade situation were recorded.Results Ultrasonic ima-ging showed the brachial plexus was shallower in group A (2.0±1.2)cm than in group B (3.5± 1.8)cm (P<0.05).Nerve block operation time in group A (2.0±1.5)min was less than that in group B (4.0 ± 1.5 )min (P <0.05 ).After 5 minutes and 10 minutes of the local anesthetic inj ection,the sensory blockade rate of the median nerve,the ulnar nerve,the radial nerve and the muscle cutaneous nerve in group A was higher than in group B (P<0.05).After 10 minutes of the inj ection,the motor blockade rate for the ulnar nerve,the radial nerve and the muscle cutaneous nerve was higher in group A than in group B (P<0.05).There were no dyspnea,nausea,vomiting,tinni-tus and other adverse reactions in the two groups.Conclusion The ultrasound-guided costoclaviculari brachial plexus block is more shallower than the subclavicular plexus block in the anatomic depth,and the nerve-blocked-operating time is shorter;at the same time,the former’s sensory and motor block effects is faster than the later.

Case Report: Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for a Case with Posterior Elbow Dislocation.

BACKGROUND: The interest in regional anesthesia procedures for the management of upper-extremity emergencies has increased. Toward that end, supraclavicular, interscalene, or infraclavicular approaches, with or without ultrasound guidance, are used for brachial plexus nerve blocks. Although many studies have reported on the use of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and interscalene brachial plexus blocks for upper-extremity dislocations, very few studies have reported on the use of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks. CASE REPORT: We present an adult patient with posterior elbow dislocation that is treated with reduction after applying an ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Additionally, we describe the infraclavicular block in detail and demonstrate the technique using images. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Based on our experience, the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block is a fast, safe, and efficient anesthesia technique that can be an excellent alternative to sedoanalgesia and other brachial plexus blocks for the management of elbow dislocations in the emergency department.

Comparison of the coracoid and retroclavicular approaches for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

PURPOSE: This prospective randomized study compared the coracoid and retroclavicular approaches to ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (IBPB) in terms of needle tip and shaft visibility and quality of block. We hypothesized that the retroclavicular approach would increase needle tip and shaft visibility and decrease the number of needle passes compared to the coracoid approach. METHODS: A total of 100 adult patients who received IBPB block for upper limb surgery were randomized into two groups: a coracoid approach group (group C) and a retroclavicular approach group (group R). In group C, the needle was inserted 2 cm medial and 2 cm inferior to the coracoid process and directed from ventral to dorsal. In group R, the needle insertion point was posterior to the clavicle and the needle was advanced from cephalad to caudal. All ultrasound images were digitally stored for analysis. The primary aim of the present study was to compare needle tip and shaft visibility between the coracoid approach and retroclavicular approach in patients undergoing upper limb surgery. The secondary aim was to investigate differences between the two groups in the number of needle passes, sensory and motor block success rates, surgical success rate, block performance time, block performance-related pain, patient satisfaction, use of supplemental local anesthetic and analgesic, and complications. RESULTS: Needle tip visibility and needle shaft visibility were significantly better in group R (p = 0.040, p = 0.032, respectively). Block performance time and anesthesia-related time were significantly shorter in group R (p = 0.022, p = 0.038, respectively). Number of needle passes was significantly lower in group R (p = 0.044). Paresthesia during block performance was significantly higher in group C (p = 0.045). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of sensory or motor block success, surgical success, block-related pain, and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The retroclavicular approach is associated with better needle tip and shaft visibility, reduced performance time and anesthesia-related time, less paresthesia during block performance, and fewer needle passes than the coracoid approach. TRiAL REGISTRY NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov (no. NCT02673086).

Can we use lower volume of local anesthetic for infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block under ultrasound guidance in children?

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the infraclavicular brachial plexus block can be applied with lower volume of local anesthetic. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blinded clinical trial. PATIENTS: 60 patients aged 5-15years with ASA I-II who underwent emergent or elective arm, forearm or hand operations were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided into two groups randomly; standard volume local anesthetic administered group (Group S, n=30) and low volume anesthetic administered group (Group L, n=30). MEASUREMENT: Postoperative pain scores, sensory and motor block durations were noted. MAIN RESULTS: Pain scores (Wong-Baker Face Scale) were evaluated and the results were detected to be similar at all times (30min, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24h). Durations of motor block were 168(±16) minutes and 268(±15) minutes in Group L and Group S respectively and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Durations of sensory block were 385(±26) and 402(±39) in Group L and Group S respectively and no statistically significant difference was detected (p=0.064). CONCLUSION: Similar block success, postoperative sensory block durations and pain scores could be obtained during infraclavicular brachial plexus in pediatric patients with lower local anesthetic volumes.

Comparative evaluation of 0.75% ropivacaine with clonidine and 0.5% bupivacaine with clonidine in infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

BACKGROUND: Infraclavicular brachial block with coracoids approach has gained popularity because of consistent bony landmarks and less chances of vascular puncture and pneumothorax. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding clonidine to bupivacaine or ropivacaine on the onset and duration of sensory and motor block and duration of analgesia in infraclavicular block. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized double-blind study, 60 patients of 18-65 years were randomly divided in to two groups of 30 each. Infraclavicular block was performed with 30 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine + 150 µg clonidine in group R and 30 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine + 150 µg clonidine in group B and were compared for onset and duration of sensory and motor block, postoperative analgesia, side-effects and complications. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the time for onset of sensory block (5.80 ± 5.12 min in group R and 4.87 ± 1.46 min in group B, P < 0.05); onset of motor block (11.37 ± 2.66 min in group R and 9.60 ± 1.78 min in group B, P < 0.05); duration of sensory and motor block (10.07 ± 0.91 and 9.03 ± 0.89 h in group R and 12.50 ± 1.14 and 10.67 ± 1.18 h in group B respectively, P < 0.01) and duration of analgesia (15.30 ± 1.39 h in group R and 18.07 ± 1.66 h in group B). No significant difference was observed in hemodynamics, sedation, side-effects and complications. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Variables were compared using Chi-square test for nonparametric data and Student's t-test for parametric data. CONCLUSION: Addition of clonidine to bupivacaine lead to early onset and prolonged duration of sensory and motor block with prolonged analgesia as compared to the addition of clonidine to ropivacaine.

Effect of body mass index on angle of needle insertion during ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to establish the angle of needle insertion from the anterior chest wall during ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block and to examine for any correlation between body mass index (BMI) and insertion angle. DESIGN: This is a prospective observational study. SETTING: The setting is at an operating room, university-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: The patients are 23 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3 patients scheduled to undergo elbow, forearm, or hand surgery under regional anesthesia with or without general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention is infraclavicular brachial plexus block with or without perineural catheter insertion. MEASUREMENTS: The measurement is the angle of needle insertion in relation to the anterior chest wall, BMI, and needle visibility as graded by the anesthesiologist. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were studied. The mean (SD) BMI was 28.5 (5.4). The median (range) of angle of needle insertion was 50 (33-60). The Pearson correlation coefficient for BMI and angle of needle insertion was 0.357. There were no reported complications. CONCLUSIONS: The median (range) angle of needle insertion in relation to chest for our study patients was 50° (33°-60°). The needle visibility was rated difficult, requiring hydrolocation or "heeling-in," in 39% of cases. There was a moderate correlation between BMI and angle of insertion. Despite difficulties with needle visualization, the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block provided reliable analgesia.

Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: Comparison of posterior cord stimulation with lateral or medial cord stimulation, a prospective double blinded study.

BACKGROUND: Infraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus sheath provides anesthesia for surgery on the distal arm, elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand. It has been found that evoked distal motor response or radial nerve-type motor response has influenced the success rate of single-injection infraclavicular brachial plexus block. AIM: We conducted this study to compare the extent and effectiveness of infraclavicular brachial plexus block achieved by injecting a local anesthetic drug after finding specific muscle action due to neural stimulator guided posterior cord stimulation and lateral cord/medial cord stimulation. METHODS: After ethical committee approval, patients were randomly assigned to one of the two study groups of 30 patients each. In group 1, posterior cord stimulation was used and in group 2 lateral/medial cord stimulation was used for infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The extent of motor block and effectiveness of sensory block were assessed. RESULTS: All four motor nerves that were selected for the extent of block were blocked in 23 cases (76.7%) in group 1 and in 15 cases (50.0%) in group 2 (P:0.032). The two groups did not differ significantly in the number of cases in which 0, 1, 2, and 3 nerves were blocked (P>0.05). In group 1, significantly lesser number of patients had pain on surgical manipulation compared with patients of group 2 (P:0.037). CONCLUSION: Stimulating the posterior cord guided by a nerve stimulator before local anesthetic injection is associated with greater extent of block (in the number of motor nerves blocked) and effectiveness of block (in reporting no pain during the surgery) than stimulation of either the lateral or medial cord.

Comparison of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for orthopaedic surgery below mid-humerus.

The brachial plexus in infraclavicular region can be blocked by various approaches. Aim of this study was to compare two approaches (coracoid and clavicular) regarding success rate, discomfort during performance of block, tourniquet tolerance and complications. The study was randomised, prospective and observer blinded. Sixty adult patients of both sexes of ASA status 1 and 2 requiring orthopaedic surgery below mid-humerus were randomly assigned to receive nerve stimulator guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block either by lateral coracoid approach (group L, n = 30) or medial clavicular approach (group M, n = 30) with 25-30 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine. Sensory block in the distribution of five main nerves distal to elbow, motor block (Grade 1-4), discomfort during performance of block and tourniquet pain were recorded by a blinded observer. Clinical success of block was defined as the block sufficient to perform the surgery without any supplementation. All the five nerves distal to elbow were blocked in 77 and 67% patients in groups L and M respectively. Successful block was observed in 87 and 73% patients in groups L and M, respectively (P > 0.05). More patients had moderate to severe discomfort during performance of block due to positioning of limb in group M (14 vs. 8 in groups M and L). Tourniquet was well tolerated in most patients with successful block in both groups. No serious complication was observed. Both the approaches were equivalent regarding success rate, tourniquet tolerance and safety. Coracoid approach seemed better as positioning of operative limb was less painful, coracoids process was easy to locate and the technique was easy to learn and master.

A comparison of infraclavicular and supraclavicular approaches to the brachial plexus using neurostimulation.

BACKGROUND: A prospective, double blind study was performed to compare the clinical effect of vertical infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator for upper limb surgery. METHODS: One hundred patients receiving upper limb surgery under infraclavicular or supraclavicular brachial plexus block were enrolled in this study. The infraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed using the vertical technique with 30 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine. The supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed using the plumb bob technique with 30 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine. The block performance-related pain was evaluated. This study observed which nerve type was stimulated, and scored the sensory and motor block. The quality of the block was assessed intra-operatively. The duration of the sensory and motor block as well as the complications were assessed. The patient's satisfaction with the anesthetic technique was assessed after surgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the block performance-related pain, frequency of the stimulated nerve type, evolution of sensory and motor block quality, or the success of the block. There were no significant differences in the duration of the sensory and motor block. There was a significant difference in the incidence of Horner's syndrome. Two patients had a pneumothorax in the supraclavicular approach. There were no significant differences in the patient's satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Both infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block had similar effects. The infraclavicular approach may be preferred to the supraclavicular approach when considering the complications.

A comparison of infraclavicular and supraclavicular approaches to the brachial plexus using neurostimulation / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: A prospective, double blind study was performed to compare the clinical effect of vertical infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator for upper limb surgery. METHODS: One hundred patients receiving upper limb surgery under infraclavicular or supraclavicular brachial plexus block were enrolled in this study. The infraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed using the vertical technique with 30 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine. The supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed using the plumb bob technique with 30 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine. The block performance-related pain was evaluated. This study observed which nerve type was stimulated, and scored the sensory and motor block. The quality of the block was assessed intra-operatively. The duration of the sensory and motor block as well as the complications were assessed. The patient's satisfaction with the anesthetic technique was assessed after surgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the block performance-related pain, frequency of the stimulated nerve type, evolution of sensory and motor block quality, or the success of the block. There were no significant differences in the duration of the sensory and motor block. There was a significant difference in the incidence of Horner's syndrome. Two patients had a pneumothorax in the supraclavicular approach. There were no significant differences in the patient's satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Both infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block had similar effects. The infraclavicular approach may be preferred to the supraclavicular approach when considering the complications.

Comparison of vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine for upper limb surgery.

BACKGROUND: We performed a prospective, double blind study to compare the clinical effect of vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block produced by 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine for upper limb surgery. METHODS: We included 60 patients receiving upper limb surgery under infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The infraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed via the vertical technique with 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine. We observed which nerve type was stimulated and scored the sensory and motor block. The quality of block was assessed intraoperatively. The duration of sensory and motor block and complications were assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in frequencies of stimulated nerve type, evolution of sensory and motor block quality, or success of block. There were no significant difference in duration of sensory block, but duration of motor block was prolonged after 0.5% levobupivacaine. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: Both 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine had similar effects in the vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block.