National Trends and Outcomes of Pedal Bypass Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The technical demands associated with pedal bypass (PB) surgery place it at risk of underutilization and may be limiting its widespread adoption as a valuable revascularization modality. This study aims to evaluate trends in PB performance, assess its outcomes, and compare its results between high- and low-volume centers. METHODS: All patients receiving a PB between 2003 and 2023 were identified in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) infrainguinal bypass (IIB) module. The ratio of PB to total IIB performed was calculated for each year and trended over the study period. Centers performing PB were categorized according to their annual PB volume into tertiles of low-volume centers (LVC, <2 PB/year), medium-volume centers (MVC, 2-4 PB/year), and high-volume centers (HVC, >4 PB/year) for comparison. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact test as appropriate for categorical variables and the analysis of variance test or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate for continuous variables. Cox regression analysis was used to study the association between center volume and the primary outcomes of primary patency, primary-assisted patency, secondary patency, reintervention, amputation, and major adverse limb events (MALE), defined as the composite outcome of amputation and/or reintervention. RESULTS: A total of 3466 patients received a PB during the study period. The ratio of PB to IIB dropped from 14% to 4% between 2003 and 2023. Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 65%, 76%, and 80%, respectively, and limb salvage rate was 83% at 1 year. Nineteen percent of centers performing IIBs in the VQI did not perform any PBs during the study period. Of the 246 centers performing PBs, 78% were LVC, 15% were MVC, and only 7% were HVC. On Cox regression analysis, HVCs were associated with a lower risk of primary patency loss (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.95; P = .010), reintervention (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95; P = .016), amputation (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98; P = .034), and MALE (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.93; P = .005) compared with LVCs. No difference in secondary patency between high- and low-volume centers was observed (P = .680). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of PB operations experienced a four-fold decrease over the past 20 years, despite favorable patency and limb salvage outcomes. Centers with a higher operative volume in PB achieve better outcomes than LVCs, and accordingly, patients with extensive tibioperoneal disease may benefit from evaluation at centers with documented expertise in PB before resorting to an alternative revascularization modality or a major limb amputation.

Contemporary Outcomes of Infrainguinal Vein Bypass Surgery for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia: A Two-Centre Cross-Sectional Study.

Background/Objectives: Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is a significant life and limb-threatening condition. Two recent seminal trials, BEST-CLI and BASIL-2, have provided seemingly conflicting results concerning the optimal treatment modality for patients with CLTI. We sought to investigate the outcomes of patient undergoing infrainguinal bypass at two centres in Aotearoa New Zealand. Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective review of all patients who underwent infrainguinal bypass grafting for CLTI at Auckland City Hospital and Waikato Hospital between January 2020 and December 2021 was performed. The primary outcome was a composite of death, above-ankle amputation, and major limb reintervention. The secondary outcome was minor limb reintervention. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine time to the primary and secondary endpoints. Demographic factors were examined using the log-rank test to examine the effect on the outcome. Results: One hundred and nineteen patients who underwent infrainguinal bypass for CLTI in the study period were identified. Of these, 93 patients had a bypass with ipsilateral or contralateral GSV. The median follow-up time was 1.85 years. The most common indication for surgery was tissue loss (69%, n = 63), with the most common distal bypass target being the below-knee popliteal artery (45%, n = 41). The primary composite outcome occurred in 42.8% of the cohort (n = 39). Death was the most common component of the primary outcome (26%, n = 24). Male sex (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.88, p = 0.018) and statin use (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24-0.98, p = 0.044) were independent predictors of protection from the composite outcome on multivariate analysis. Dialysis dependence (HR 3.32, 95% CI 1.23-8.99, p = 0.018) was an independent predictor for patients meeting the composite outcome. Conclusions: This study's results are consistent with the published outcomes of BEST-CLI. The patient cohorts examined, anatomical disease patterns, and conduit use may explain some of the differences observed between this study, BEST-CLI and BASIL-2. Further work is required to define the specific patient populations who will benefit most from an open surgical or endovascular first approach to the management of CLTI.

Prophylactic muscle flaps in high-risk-for-poor-healing patients with prosthetic bypasses increases deep wound complications.

BACKGROUND: Incisional complications of groin after inflow or infrainguinal bypasses with prosthetic conduits can result in major morbidities that require reoperation, infected graft removal, and limb loss. Muscle flaps are typically performed to treat groin wound complications, but they are also done prophylactically at the time of index procedures in certain high-risk-for-poor-healing patients to mitigate anticipated groin wound complications. We used a nationwide multi-institutional database to investigate outcomes of prophylactic muscle flaps in high-risk patients who underwent prosthetic bypasses involving femoral anastomosis. METHODS: We utilized ACS-NSQIP database 2005-2021 to identify all elective inflow and infrainguinal bypasses that involve femoral anastomoses. Only high-risk patients for poor incisional healing who underwent prosthetic conduit bypasses were selected. A 1:3 propensity-matching was performed to obtain two comparable studied groups between those with (FLAP) and without prophylactic muscle flaps (NOFLAP) based on demographics and comorbidities. 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Among 35,011 NOFLAP, 990 of them were propensity-matched to 330 FLAP. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality, MACE, pulmonary, or renal complications. FLAP was associated with higher bleeding requiring transfusion, longer operative time, and longer hospital stay. FLAP also had higher overall wound complications (15.2% vs. 10.6%; p = 0.03), especially deep incisional infection (4.9% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic muscle flap for prosthetic bypasses involving femoral anastomosis in high-risk-for-poor-healing patients does not appear to mitigate 30-day wound complications. Caution should be exercised with this practice and more long-term data should be obtained to determine whether prophylactic flaps decrease the incidence of graft infection.

Long-term outcomes of below-the-knee bypass surgery using heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of below-the-knee (BK) bypass surgery using heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts, performed in two centers since its launch in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of databases from two medical centers, evaluating 51 limbs in 42 consecutive patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), who underwent BK bypass surgery using heparin-bonded ePTFE grafts between October, 2013 and April, 2023. RESULTS: Thirty-three limbs (64.7%) were classified as Rutherford category 4-6 and 33 limbs (64.7%) had a history of ipsilateral revascularization. Technical success was achieved in 98% of the patients. The 30 day mortality rate was 2.4% (n = 1) and the overall 30 day complication rate was 9.5% (n = 4). The median follow-up period was 38 (interquartile range 13-67) months. Three patients required major amputation and 14 died during follow-up. Primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 67.8%, 57.5%, and 46.5%, respectively, while secondary patency rates for these periods were 84.6%, 70.0%, and 66.0%, respectively. Overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 90.1%, 74.5%, and 70.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BK bypass surgery using heparin-bonded ePTFE graft is a viable and durable option for patients with PAD, who are deemed unsuitable for autologous vein bypass surgery.

The association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 30-day outcomes of infrainguinal bypass surgery: A propensity-score matching study.

BACKGROUND: Infrainguinal bypass surgery is an effective treatment for peripheral artery disease (PAD). While chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been linked to heightened risks of mortality and morbidity in major surgery, a thorough investigation into COPD's impact on infrainguinal bypass outcomes remained underexplored. Thus, this study aimed to assess the 30-day outcomes for COPD patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery. METHODS: COPD and non-COPD patients who underwent infrainguinal bypass were identified in American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2011 to 2022. Patients of age<18 were excluded. A 1:1 propensity-score matching was used to match demographics, baseline characteristics, symptomatology, procedure, conduit, and anesthesia. Thirty postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There were 3,183 (12.64%) and 22,004 (87.36%) patients with and without COPD, respectively, who underwent infrainguinal bypass. COPD patients had a higher comorbid burden. After propensity-score matching, COPD patients had higher sepsis (3.55% vs 2.42%, p = 0.01), wound complications (18.94% vs 16.40%, p = 0.01), and 30-day readmission (18.00% vs 14.92%, p < 0.01). However, COPD and non-COPD patients had comparable 30-day mortality (2.54% vs 2.67%, p = 0.81), and organ system complications including cardiac (3.58% vs 3.99%, p = 0.43), pulmonary (3.96% vs 3.20%, p = 0.12), and renal complications (1.70% vs 1.82%, p = 0.78). Limb-specific outcomes including major amputation (2.95% vs 2.50%, p = 0.30), untreated loss of patency (1.85% vs 1.38%, p = 0.16), and patent graft (98.24% vs 98.65%, p = 0.27) were also comparable between the cohorts. CONCLUSION: While COPD might be associated with the development of PAD due to potentially shared pathophysiology, it may not be an independent risk factor for the major 30-day outcomes in infrainguinal bypass surgery.

Graft Failure After Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia (CLTI) Patients: The Role of Graft Surveillance.

Introduction Failure of infrainguinal bypass grafts remains a major problem tackled by vascular surgeons despite a meticulous surgical technique. All infrainguinal bypasses should go under routine surveillance to pick the grafts at risk for the prevention of graft failure. Objectives The aim was to find out if we were adhering to the European Society of Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines in the management of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) patients, including postoperative follow-up and to monitor whether the patients were having postoperative duplex surveillance scans to pick any graft at risk. Methods All patients who underwent infra-inguinal bypass procedures for CLTI during the last eight months (from mid-January to mid-September 2023) in our vascular unit were included. Retrospective data were collected. Results A total of 38 patients had lower limb bypass procedures over the last eight months (from 15 January till 14 September 2023). However, two femoral-femoral (fem-fem) crossovers, one Ilio-popliteal, and one pedal bypass were excluded. Thus, a total of 36 patients were included in the study (n=34). The vast majority (n=27, 79.4%) had femoro popliteal bypass anastomosing distally to above knee (AK) or below knee (BK) popliteal artery, and the rest (n=7, 20.5%) had distal bypass (fem-distal or pop-distal bypass). Moreover, 18% of patients had amputation, 15% of patients died, and 61% of the remaining patients were on surveillance. Of those, who were not on surveillance, 44% of them had graft occlusion. Conclusion Surveillance can predict graft at risk, and the graft occlusion can be prevented by appropriate intervention. Every vascular unit should have its own post-procedural follow-up strategies.

Valvulotomy of the great saphenous vein in ex situ non-reversed and in situ setting: a multicenter post-market study to assess the safety and efficacy of the AndraValvulotome™".

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and technical success of the AndraValvulotome™ device (Andramed GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) requiring bypass surgery using the great saphenous vein (GSV) as graft. METHODS: This was a multicenter, post-market observational study conducted in 2021 in 11 German centers. Safety and efficacy data were prospectively collected and analyzed. Primary endpoints were the absence of device-related serious adverse events until 30 ± 7 days follow-up, the clinical efficacy of valvulotomy, which was defined as pulsatile blood flow in the bypass and the number of insufficiently destroyed vein valves. Secondary endpoints were the number of valvulotomy passages, the primary patency rate of the venous bypass (determined by a color-duplex sonography showing a normal blood flow through the bypass and absence of stenosis or occlusion), and the primary technical success defined as the absence of product-specific (serious) adverse events and clinical efficacy. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 71 years (46-91), and 74.6% were males. The vein material used for bypass grafting had a median length of 47.5 cm (range 20-70 cm) with a median diameter of 5.0 mm (range 3-6 mm) and 4.0 mm (range 2-6 mm) in the proximal and distal segments, respectively. The technical success rate was 96.6%. The primary patency rate was 89.9% at 30 days follow-up. The clinical efficacy was rated as very good in 81% of patients, fair in 17%, and poor in 2%. Between 1 and 5 (average 2.9) valvulotome passages were performed. One product-related serious adverse event was recorded (bypass vein dissection). CONCLUSION: The AndraValvulotome™ can be considered a safe and effective device to disrupt venous valves during in situ non-reversed bypass surgeries using GSV grafts in patients with PAD.

Long-term outcome and cancer incidence after lower extremity bypass surgery in patients with critical limb threatening ischemia.

PURPOSE: The influence of cancer development on long-term outcome after lower extremity bypass surgery in patients with critical limb threatening ischemia was investigated. METHODS: Patient survival and cancer incidence were recorded for 21,082 patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) stage III (n = 5631; 26.7%) and stage IV (n = 15,451; 73.3%) registered with the AOK health insurance company in Germany who underwent infrainguinal bypass surgery. All patients were preoperative and in their history cancer-free. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 44 months, 25.6% of all patients developed cancer (Kaplan-Meier estimated), with no significant differences between patients with PAD stage III and IV (cancer incidence stage III 25.7%, stage IV 25.5%; p = 0.421). In the Cox regression analysis, male gender (HR 1.885; 95% CI 1.714-2.073, p < 0.001) and age over 70 years (HR 1.399; 95% CI 1.285-1.522, p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for the development of cancer. Survival was significantly lower in stage IV (23.4%) compared to stage III (44.5%) (HR 1.720; 95% CI 1.645-1.799, p < 0.001). Cancer was a significant risk factor for overall survival in PAD stage III patients (HR: 1.326; 95% CI 1.195-1.471, p < 0.001) but not in PAD stage IV (HR 0.976; 95% CI 0.919-1.037, p = 0.434). CONCLUSION: Patients with PAD stage III have significantly better survival after infrainguinal bypass surgery compared to patients with stage IV. While cancer incidence was essential for survival in stage III, it was of no importance in stage IV.

Outcomes of lower extremity revascularization in octogenarians and nonagenarians for intermittent claudication.

OBJECTIVE: Revascularization for intermittent claudication (IC) due to infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is dependent on durability and expected benefit. We aimed to assess outcomes for IC interventions in octogenarians and nonagenarians (age ≥80 years) and those younger than 80 years (age <80 years). METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried (2010-2020) for peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) and infrainguinal bypasses (IIBs) performed to treat IC. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes were analyzed (comparing age ≥80 years and age <80 years). RESULTS: There were 84,210 PVIs (12.1% age ≥80 years and 87.9% age <80 years) and 10,980 IIBs (7.4% age ≥80 years and 92.6% age <80 years) for IC. For PVI, patients aged ≥80 years more often underwent femoropopliteal (70.7% vs 58.1%) and infrapopliteal (19% vs 9.3%) interventions, and less often iliac interventions (32.1% vs 48%) (P < .001 for all). Patients aged ≥80 years had more perioperative hematomas (3.5% vs 2.4%) and 30-day mortality (0.9% vs 0.4%) (P < .001). At 1-year post-intervention, the age ≥80 years cohort had fewer independently ambulatory patients (80% vs 91.5%; P < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed patients aged ≥80 years had lower reintervention/amputation-free survival (81.4% vs 86.8%), amputation-free survival (87.1% vs 94.1%), and survival (92.3% vs 96.8%) (P < .001) at 1-year after PVI. Risk adjusted analysis showed that age ≥80 years was associated with higher reintervention/amputation/death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.35), amputation/death (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.61-2.13), and mortality (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.66-2.23) (P < .001 for all) for PVI. For IIB, patients aged ≥80 years more often had an infrapopliteal target (28.4% vs 19.4%) and had higher 30-day mortality (1.3% vs 0.5%), renal failure (4.1% vs 2.2%), and cardiac complications (5.4% vs 3.1%) (P < .001). At 1 year, the age ≥80 years group had fewer independently ambulatory patients (81.7% vs 88.8%; P = .02). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the age ≥80 years cohort had lower reintervention/amputation-free survival (75.7% vs 81.5%), amputation-free survival (86.9% vs 93.9%), and survival (90.4% vs 96.5%) (P < .001 for all). Risk-adjusted analysis showed age ≥80 years was associated with higher amputation/death (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.1-2.54; P = .015) and mortality (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.16-2.93; P = .009), but not reintervention/amputation/death (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.85-1.44; P = .47) after IIB. CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians and nonagenarians have greater perioperative morbidity and long-term ambulatory impairment, limb loss, and mortality after PVI and IIB for claudication. Risks of intervention on elderly patients with claudication should be carefully weighed against the perceived benefits of revascularization. Medical and exercise therapy efforts should be maximized in this population.

Post-operative transfusion is associated with infrainguinal bypass graft failure: contemporary Australian tertiary centre experience.

BACKGROUNDS: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an increasingly prevalent and highly morbid pathology affecting the older population. Infra-inguinal bypass (IIB) surgery remains a robust revascularization option in these patients. This study aimed to identify modifiable predictors associated with graft patency and functional outcomes in contemporary Australian vascular surgical practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing IIB between 2010 and 2020 at a tertiary vascular surgery centre in Australia was performed. Data regarding patient demographics, co-morbidities, pre-operative investigations, bypass characteristics, and discharge outcomes were collected. Surveillance ultrasound scans were reviewed to gain information on graft patency and compliance up to 2 years post-operatively. The primary outcome was graft failure. Secondary outcomes were mobility status and amputation-free survival at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 239 IIBs were performed on 207 patients during the 10-year period. Significant predictors for primary graft occlusion included regional referral (P < 0.01), low pre-operative haemoglobin level (P < 0.01), post-operative transfusion requirement (P = 0.02), use of prosthetic conduit (P < 0.01) and non-compliance to ultrasound surveillance (P < 0.01). Patients with a thrombosed graft were 2.4 times more likely to experience deterioration in mobility status (P < 0.01) and 8.6 times more likely to have major limb amputation or death at 1 year. The amputation-free survival was 88.3% at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Optimization of pre-operative haemoglobin level for IIB should be advocated in clinical practice in order to reduce the risk of graft failure, deterioration in ambulatory function, major limb amputation and mortality.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of primary bypass surgery compared with bypass surgery after endovascular treatment in peripheral artery disease patients.

OBJECTIVE: Both bypass surgery and endovascular treatment are well-recognized interventions for the treatment of peripheral artery disease; however, the effect of failed endovascular treatment on subsequent surgeries remains controversial. A systematic review was conducted to compare the outcomes of primary bypass and bypass surgery after endovascular treatment. METHODS: Three academic databases (Embase, PubMed, and Scopus) were searched from their inception to August 2022. Two independent investigators searched for studies that reported the outcomes of primary bypass surgery and bypass surgery after endovascular treatment in patients with peripheral artery disease. Abstracts and full-text studies were screened independently using duplicate data abstraction. Dichotomous outcome measures were reported using a random-effects model to generate a summary odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Seventeen retrospective observational studies were selected from 3911 articles and included 8064 patients, 6252 of whom underwent primary bypass surgery and 1812 underwent bypass surgery after endovascular treatment. The mean age was 69.0 years and 61.2% (n = 4938) were male. For perioperative outcomes, the 30-day results showed no difference in mortality (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.53-1.10), or amputation (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.67-1.20). For short- to mid-term outcomes, primary patency did not differ at 6 months (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.19), 1 year (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.97-1.30), or 2 years (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.85-1.61) follow-up. Amputation-free survival did not differ at 6 months (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.82-1.30), 1 year (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.89-1.32), 2 years (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.93-1.50), or 3 years (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.84-1.40) of follow-up. No significant difference was found in overall survival or second patency. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of retrospective, nonrandomized, observational studies suggests that prior endovascular treatment of lower extremity arterial disease does not result in worse perioperative, short-term, or mid-term clinical outcomes of subsequent infrainguinal bypass surgery compared with patients without prior endovascular treatment.

A framework for perioperative care for lower extremity vascular bypasses: A Consensus Statement by the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) Society and Society for Vascular Surgery.

The Society for Vascular Surgery and the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society formally collaborated and elected an international, multi-disciplinary panel of experts to review the literature and provide evidence-based suggestions for coordinated perioperative care for patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery for peripheral artery disease. Structured around the ERAS core elements, 26 suggestions were made and organized into preadmission, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative sections.

The outcomes of lower extremity revascularization: What role do race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status play?

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease and the resultant complications disproportionately affect underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups, as well as those with low socioeconomic status (SES). Revascularization, including both open surgical and endovascular techniques, is a mainstay of therapy for symptomatic peripheral artery disease; it is required to maximize limb salvage in chronic limb-threatening ischemia and used to improve function and quality of life in patients with claudication. The outcomes of lower extremity revascularization in Black and Hispanic patients, as well as patients with low SES, are not widely known and this knowledge gap formed the basis for this review. The preponderance of evidence suggests that Black, Hispanic, and low-SES patients have inferior limb-related outcomes after revascularization compared with White patients. Based solely on the limited published evidence in the revascularization literature, the specific reasons for these disparities are not clear. The high prevalence of comorbidities and risks factors, as well as the advanced presentation of peripheral artery disease in Black, Hispanic, and low-SES patients, appear to contribute to the inferior limb outcomes post revascularization seen in these groups, but do not account for all of the disparities. Undoubtedly, a complex interplay of social determinants underlies these disparities in care and outcomes at individual, community, and societal levels. Additional understanding of the underpinnings and mechanisms of inferior outcomes in these populations in the specific context of lower extremity revascularization is needed, as this would allow us to identify targets for intervention to improve post-revascularization outcomes in these at-risk populations.

Comparative analysis of patients undergoing lower extremity bypass using in-situ and reversed great saphenous vein graft techniques.

OBJECTIVE: Autologous great saphenous vein (GSV) is considered the conduit of choice for lower extremity bypass (LEB). However, the optimal configuration remains the source of debate. We compared outcomes of patients undergoing LEB using in-situ and reversed techniques. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for patients undergoing LEB with a single-segment GSV in in-situ (ISGSV) and reversed (RGSV) configurations for symptomatic occlusive disease from 2003 to 2021. Patient demographics, procedural detail, and in-hospital and follow-up outcomes were collected. The primary outcome measures included primary patency at discharge or 30 days and one year. Secondary outcomes were secondary patency, and reinterventions at discharge or 30 days and one year. Cox proportional hazards models were created to determine the association between bypass techniques and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Of 8234 patients undergoing LEBs, in-situ and reversed techniques were used in 3546 and 4688 patients, respectively. The indication for LEBs was similar between the two cohorts. ISGSV was performed more frequently from the common femoral artery and to more distal targets. RGSV bypass was associated with higher intraoperative blood loss and longer operative time. Perioperatively, ISGSV cohort had higher rates of reinterventions (13.2 vs 11.1%; p = 0.004), surgical site infection (4.2 vs 3%; p = 0.003), and lower primary patency (93.5 vs 95%; p = 0.004) but a comparable rate of secondary patency (99 vs 99.1%; p = 0.675). At 1 year, in-situ bypasses had a lower rate of reinterventions (19.4% vs 21.6%; p=0.02), with similar rates of primary (82.6 vs 81.8%; p = 0.237) and secondary patency (88.7 vs 88.9%; p = 0.625). After adjusting for significant baseline differences and potential confounders, in-situ bypass was independently associated with decreased risks of primary patency loss (HR 0.9; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; p = 0.016) and reinterventions (HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.8-0.97; p = 0.014) but a similar risk of secondary patency loss (HR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86-1.16; p = 0.985) at follow-up, compared to reversed bypass. A subgroup analysis of bypasses to crural targets showed that in-situ and reversed bypasses had similar rates of primary patency loss and reinterventions at 1 year. Among patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, in-situ bypass was associated with a decreased risk of reinterventions but similar rates of primary and secondary patency and major amputations at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing LEBs using the GSV, in-situ configuration was associated with more perioperative reinterventions and lower primary patency rate. However, this was offset by decreased risks of loss of primary patency and reinterventions at 1 year. A thorough intraoperative graft assessment with adjunctive imaging may be performed to detect abnormalities in patients undergoing in-situ bypasses to prevent early failures. Furthermore, closer surveillance of reversed bypass grafts is warranted given the higher rates of reinterventions.

Non-reversed and Reversed Great Saphenous Vein Graft Configurations Offer Comparable Early Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Infrainguinal Bypass.

OBJECTIVE: Data on the efficacy of non-reversed and reversed great saphenous vein bypass (NRGSV and RGSV) techniques are lacking. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing open infrainguinal revascularisation using NRGSV and RGSV from a multi-institutional database. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for patients undergoing infrainguinal bypasses using NRGSV and RGSV for symptomatic occlusive disease from January 2003 to February 2021. The primary outcome measures included primary and secondary patency at discharge and one year. Secondary outcomes were re-interventions at discharge and one year. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the impact of graft configuration on outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Of 7 123 patients, 4 662 and 2 461 patients underwent RGSV and NRGSV, respectively. At one year, the rates of primary patency (78% vs. 78%; p = .83), secondary patency (90% vs. 89%; p = .26), and re-intervention (16% vs. 16%; p = .95) were similar between the RGSV and NRGSV cohorts, respectively. Subgroup analysis based on outflow bypass target and indication for revascularisation did not show differences in primary and secondary outcomes between the two groups. Multivariable analysis confirmed that RGSV (NRGSV as the reference) configuration was not independently associated with increased risk of primary patency loss (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91 - 1.13; p = .80), secondary patency loss (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.81 - 1.10; p = .44), and re-intervention (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.91 - 1.16; p = .67) at follow up. CONCLUSION: The study shows that RGSV and NRGSV grafting techniques have comparable peri-operative and one year primary and secondary patency and re-intervention rates. This effect persisted when stratified by outflow targets and indication for revascularisation. Therefore, optimal selection of vein grafting technique should be guided by the patient's anatomy, vein conduit availability, and surgeon's experience.

Aneurysmal degeneration of the hood of a cryopreserved vein allograft two years after thrombosis.

Cryopreserved vein allografts are used as alternative conduits for infrainguinal bypass but are prone to aneurysmal degeneration. A 60-year-old man presented with a pulsatile, tender right groin mass 2 years after thrombosis of a cryopreserved vein jump graft emanating from a prosthetic axillary to profunda bypass. Intraoperatively, the aneurysm was consistent with isolated dilatation of the hood of the thrombosed cryopreserved vein graft. This was excised and repaired with bovine pericardial patch angioplasty. The patient recovered with no recurrence for 2 years. Aneurysmal degeneration of the cryopreserved vein allograft can occur even after graft thrombosis.

Outcomes and Fate of the Distal Landing Zone Compared Between Prosthetic and Autologous Grafts After Infra-Inguinal Graft Occlusions.

Background: Due to an increasing life expectancy, more and more patients experience the failure of peripheral arterial revascularization. This study aims to investigate patients treated for the failure of infra-inguinal bypass grafts, and to investigate the interaction of different bypass materials [great saphenous vein (GSV) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)] and the further outcome. Methods: Retrospective single-center analysis of consecutive patients treated for acute or chronic occlusion of infra-inguinal bypasses at a university hospital was conducted. Hospitalizations from 1st January 2010 through 31st December 2019 were included. Perioperative parameters from the index operation including graft material (prosthetic vs. autologous) were assessed. After bypass occlusion, the grade of ischemia, as well as the distal landing zone of the redo bypass compared with the primary bypass was investigated. Results: In this study, 158 (65% men and 35% women with a m mean age of 70.5 years) eligible patients were included (57% vein and 42% prosthetic bypass grafts). After graft occlusion, 47% of the patients presented with symptoms of acute limb-threatening ischemia, 53% with symptoms of chronic leg ischemia. The rate of acute limb-threatening ischemia was significantly higher when prosthetic graft material was used during the index operation (p =0.016). Additionally, in case of reoperation, the landing zone of the redo bypass was significantly more distally located after occlusion of prosthetic bypass graft (p = 0.014). Conclusion: Occlusions of prosthetic bypass grafts were associated with significantly higher rates of acute symptoms compared with vein grafts. Additionally, a shift to a more distal landing zone was recognized after the failure of a prosthetic bypass graft during the redo bypass operation.

Autologous saphenous vein and heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene as graft materials for below-the-knee femoro-popliteal bypass in patients with critical limb ischemia: A propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of heparin bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (HePTFE) and autologous saphenous vein (ASV) in patients undergoing below-knee (BK) femoro-popliteal bypass for critical limb ischemia (CLI). DESIGN: Retrospective single-centre matched case-control study. METHODS: From 2003 to 2019, 275 consecutive BK bypasses for CLI were performed, 109 with the ASV and 166 with a HePTFE graft. All the baseline characteristics that were reliably measured and were potentially relevant in the decision-making process were included as confounders in a logistic regression model and the factors that were significantly different between the two groups then used to perform a propensity matching analysis. Propensity score-based matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio to compare outcomes. Arterial hypertension, hyperlipemia, the need for tibial anastomosis at the distal level and the run-off status were the covariates included in the matching. Follow-up outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared with log rank test. RESULTS: After propensity matching, 101 HePTFE bypasses were matched with 101 ASV bypasses. The median duration of follow-up was 37 months (range 1-192). The 5-year survival rate was 67.5% (standard error (SE) 0.05) in the HePTFe group and 64.5% (SE 0.06) in the ASV group (p = 0.8, log rank 0.04). Primary patency rates were 38% (SE 0.06) in the HePTFE group and 41% (SE 0.06) in the ASV group (p = 0.7, log rank 0.3). Also assisted primary patency and secondary patency rates did not differ in the two groups. Amputation-free survival was 53% (SE 0.05) in the HePTFE group and 58% (SE 0.06) in the ASF group (p = 0.6, log rank 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: HePTFE provided 5-year similar results to those obtained with use of the ASV in equivalent patients with CLI undergoing below-knee or tibial bypass.

Outcomes of bypass and endovascular interventions for advanced femoropopliteal disease in patients with premature peripheral artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with premature peripheral artery disease (PAD), defined as age ≤50 years at presentation, have had poor outcomes with open and endovascular lower extremity revascularization. It is unclear whether either strategy is associated with better outcomes because comparative studies have been limited to case series in this patient population. The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of patients with premature PAD who had undergone bypass or endovascular revascularization for advanced femoropopliteal disease. Our hypothesis was that open bypass would provide superior long-term outcomes compared with endovascular intervention for patients with premature advanced femoropopliteal PAD. METHODS: All the patients with premature PAD who had undergone isolated femoropopliteal lower extremity revascularization and included in the Vascular Quality Initiative infrainguinal bypass and peripheral vascular intervention files were reviewed from 2003 through 2019. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed between patients who had undergone femoropopliteal bypass and endovascular interventions for isolated femoropopliteal Trans-Atlantic Classification System C or D lesions. The 1-year outcomes, including reintervention, patency, major amputation, and mortality, were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 2538 included patients, 902 had undergone isolated femoropopliteal endovascular intervention and 1636 had undergone femoropopliteal bypass. The endovascular intervention group were more likely to have diabetes (68.9% vs 54.0%; P < .001), coronary artery disease (31.0% vs 23.0%; P < .001), renal failure requiring dialysis (14.2% vs 7.2%; P < .001), and claudication (45.1% vs 36.6%; P < .001) compared with the bypass group. After propensity score matching, 466 patients were in each group with no significant differences in the baseline characteristics. Perioperative morbidity was higher with femoropopliteal bypass compared with endovascular intervention (12.0% vs 7.9%; P = .038); however, the rates of major amputation and mortality were not different. At 1 year, patients who had undergone femoropopliteal bypass were less likely to require reintervention (17.0% vs 25.2%; P = .012). However, no differences were found in major amputation (7.7% vs 7.9%; P = .928) or mortality (5.2% vs 5.2%; P = 1.00). Propensity score matching was also performed between femoropopliteal bypass with the great saphenous vein and isolated femoropopliteal endovascular interventions, and the outcomes were similar. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with premature PAD and advanced femoropopliteal disease, bypass surgery decreased the reintervention rate at 1 year but was associated with increased perioperative morbidity and hospital length of stay compared with endovascular therapy. No differences were found in major amputation or mortality between the two strategies.

Effect of infrainguinal bypass tunneling technique on patency and amputation in patients with limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association of tunneling technique on patency and amputation in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass for limb ischemia. METHODS: The National Vascular Quality Initiative database infrainguinal bypass module from 2008 to 2017 was queried for analysis. We excluded cases with non-great saphenous vein grafts, grafts using multiple segments, aneurysmal disease indications, bypass locations outside the femoral to below the knee popliteal artery or tibial arteries, and missing data on tunneling type and limb ischemia. The main exposure variable was the tunneling type, subcutaneously vs subfascially. Our primary outcomes were primary patency and amputation. The secondary outcomes included primary-assisted patency and secondary patency. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: A total of 5497 bypass patients (2835 subcutaneous and 2662 subfascial) were included. Age, race, graft orientation (reversed vs not reversed), bypass donor and recipient vessels, harvest type, end-stage renal disease, smoking, coronary artery bypass graft, congestive heart failure, P2Y12 inhibitor at discharge, surgical site infection at discharge, and indication (rest pain vs tissue loss vs acute ischemia) were analyzed for an association with the tunneling technique (P < .05). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the tunneling type was not associated with primary patency, primary-assisted patency, secondary patency, or major amputation (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with subfascial tunneling, the superficial tunneling technique was not associated with primary patency or major amputation in limb ischemia patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass with a single-segment great saphenous vein.