Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 82: 104611, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36268298

RESUMO

Background: The component separation (CS) technique is widely used for abdominal wall defects, particularly in infected wounds. CS is associated with many wound complications due to subcutaneous blood flow disturbance. Endoscopic component separation (ECS) has fewer wound complications compared to CS and has been performed recently. However, there are various port required placements for ECS, and this technique requires proficiency. One approach for ECS is the inguinal single-port approach, which can be performed from an inguinal incision similar to that used in open surgery for inguinal hernias. Case presentation: We performed ECS with an inguinal single-port approach in three older adults. All patients had abdominal wall defects with infection at the central abdominal wound site. A 2-3-cm incision was created in the middle of the inguinal ligament, and a single-port surgical device with two 5-mm trocars was placed in the incision. The external oblique muscle was separated from the internal oblique muscle, and the external oblique aponeurosis was released. The muscle flap of the abdominal wall was moved to the central line. Tension-free abdominal wall closure was possible using a one-handed approach. Conclusions: ECS, which has fewer wound complications, requires proficiency. This procedure is a simple and easy-to-perform procedure using an inguinal incision that surgeons are familiar with.

2.
BMC Surg ; 21(1): 21, 2021 Jan 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33407324

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery for inguinal cryptorchidism. METHODS: The patients were divided into the minimally invasive surgery group (n = 100) and the traditional surgery group (n = 58). In the minimally invasive surgery group, patients with low inguinal cryptorchidism (n = 54) underwent surgery with a transscrotal incision, and patients with high inguinal cryptorchidism (n = 46) underwent laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: There was no difference in the hospital stay duration or cost between the minimally invasive surgery group and the traditional surgery group (P > 0.05). As for the operative time, minimally invasive surgery of low inguinal cryptorchidism was shorter than traditional surgery (P = 0.033), while minimally invasive surgery of high inguinal cryptorchidism was comparable to traditional surgery (P = 0.658). Additionally, there were no cases of testicular atrophy, testicular retraction, inguinal hernia or hydrocele in either group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of poor wound healing between the two groups (P > 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of scrotal hematoma between the two groups (P > 0.05), the incidence in the minimally invasive surgery group was higher than that in the traditional surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery including a transscrotal incision for low inguinal cryptorchidism and laparoscopic surgery for high inguinal cryptorchidism is as safe and effective as traditional surgery, and could also provide a good cosmetic effect for children.


Assuntos
Criptorquidismo , Hérnia Inguinal , Laparoscopia , Hidrocele Testicular , Criptorquidismo/cirurgia , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Orquidopexia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escroto/cirurgia , Hidrocele Testicular/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 59(4): 635-641, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32094049

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of gentamicin containing collagen implants in the reduction of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing an inguinal incision for vascular surgery. METHODS: Prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial (RCT), performed in four hospitals in The Netherlands and Belgium. This study included 288 patients who underwent an inguinal incision for primary arterial repair (femoral endarterectomy, femorofemoral or femoropopliteal bypass, aortobifemoral bypass, thrombectomy, embolectomy, endovascular aneurysm repair) between October 2012 and December 2015. Patients were randomised to receive a gentamicin implant (study group) or no implant (control group). The calculated sample sizes of 304 patients per group were not reached. Primary outcome was SSI incidence after six weeks. Secondary outcomes were time to onset of infection, length of hospital stay, allergic reactions, treatment with antibiotics, need for re-admission, re-operation and mortality. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients were allocated to the study group (mean age 69 ± 9.2 years) and 137 patients were allocated to the control group (mean age 70 ± 10.4 years). Both groups were homogeneous regarding baseline and intra-operative characteristics. Gentamicin implants did not result in a significant overall reduction of SSIs in the study group (7% vs. 12%, p = .17). In a post hoc analysis comparing two study sites with low (<10%) and two study sites with high (>10%) infection rates in the control group, gentamicin implants significantly reduced SSIs in high risk centres (22% vs. 1%, p < .001), whereas there was no significant effect in low risk centres (13% vs. 7%, p = .30). There were no allergic reactions and all secondary outcomes were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Gentamicin implants did not result in a significant overall reduction of SSIs in this RCT. Gentamicin implants did reduce the incidence of SSIs in high risk centres and may be a valuable adjunct to improve outcomes in such vascular centres with a high incidence of wound infections. However, the limitation of not reaching the calculated sample sizes should be considered.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Gentamicinas/farmacologia , Virilha/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/tratamento farmacológico , Colágeno/farmacologia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológico
4.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 49(5-6): 129-34, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26323968

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) and their prevention continue to be a major point of focus in all surgical specialties today. Antibiotic prophylaxis is one of the mainstays in their prevention. Due to the consistently high proportion of infections caused by intestinal flora from the start of our wound surveillance registry in 2005, we conducted a change in prophylactic antibiotic therapy from cloxacillin in 2012 to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in 2013. METHODS: The study included all patients undergoing vascular surgery with groin incisions between March 1 and June 30 in 2012 and 2013, respectively, whereby the antibiotic regime was changed in between the 2 sampling periods. The diagnosis of SSI was based on clinical examination and microbiological results. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen patients with inguinal incisions were included in the analysis: 105 in the cloxacillin group of which 19% had SSI and 114 in the TMP-SMX group with an SSI rate of 18% (P = .77), without differences between the 2 groups regarding age, gender, proportion of emergency surgery, type of surgery, or frequency of concomitant foot ulcers. The high proportion of infections caused by intestinal flora between time periods was unchanged (67% vs 81%, P = .34). CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the 2 groups, suggesting that the choice of antibiotic prophylaxis had a limited role in preventing SSI at our center. Despite this, the lower cost and ease of the administration of TMP-SMX can be seen as convincing advantages.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Cloxacilina/administração & dosagem , Virilha/irrigação sanguínea , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
ANZ J Surg ; 84(9): 649-52, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24661643

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy has been performed in many countries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inguinal incision as a route for hand-assisted manipulation and allograft retrieval. METHODS: From April 2011 to June 2012, a prospective clinical study of 21 cases of retroperitoneal live donor nephrectomy was performed at our hospital. All donors were grouped in a test group (n = 11, inguinal incision) or a control group (n = 10, lumbar incision). The operative time, warm ischaemia time, blood loss, hospital stay, cosmetic satisfaction, incision complications, and recipient's serum creatinines were compared between groups. RESULTS: All 21 cases of retroperitoneal live donor nephrectomy were accomplished successfully without serious complications. There was no difference in blood loss and operative time between groups. The mean warm ischaemic time and hospital stay was shorter (P < 0.01), and satisfaction with cosmesis was greater (P < 0.05) in the test group. The abdominal asymmetry (4/10) and wound dehiscence occurred only in the control group. The recipient's serum creatinine was lower in the test group at 1 day (P < 0.01) and 3 days (P < 0.05) after transplantation. CONCLUSION: The inguinal incision offers an ideal route for hand-assisted manipulation and allograft retrieval during retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy, and has a potential to be generally applied in the future.


Assuntos
Canal Inguinal/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim , Laparoscopia/métodos , Doadores Vivos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Espaço Retroperitoneal
6.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 105-108, 2013.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-430808

RESUMO

Objective To evaluate the application of inguinal incision in retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy(LNU)in the treatment of upper urinary urothelial carcinoma(UUUC).Methods From Mar.2007 to Jan.2012,186 retroperitoneal LNU procedures on 115 males and 71 females for the treatment of UUUC were performed in our institute.All cases were grouped as inguinal incision group(n =112)and lumbar incision group(n =74)according to specimen retrieval incision.Operative time,estimated blood loss,postoperative analgesia,hospital stay,incision complications,cosmetic satisfaction and tumor recurrence were compared between the 2 groups.Results All the 186 cases of operation were successfully accomplished.There were no differences in tumor stage,tumor grade,mean operative time,blood loss between the 2 groups.In inguinal incision group,the incidence of incision fat liquefaction,incision hernia,incision bulging,lumboabdominal unsymmetry and postoperative analgesia was less than that of lumbar incision group.In inguinal incision group,the mean hospital stay was shorter,cosmetic satisfaction(Ⅰ/Ⅱ/Ⅲ)was better(7/24/81 versus 22/18/34,P < 0.01).Recurrence rate of UUUC in middle and inferior segment of ureter was fewer than that of lumbar incision group(5.3% versus 35.0%,P <0.01).Conclusion Retroperitoneal LNU for UUUC combined with inguinal incision offers advantage of less trauma,less complications,higher cosmetic satisfaction and lower tumor recurrence.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...