Aspectos epidemiológicos, manejo clínico y resultados a corto plazo en pacientes mayores diagnosticados de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en urgencias en España: resultados del estudio EDEN-34 / Epidemiological aspects, clinical management and short-term outcomes in elderly patients diagnosed with acute heart failure in the emergency department in Spain: results of the EDEN-34 study

Objetivo: Estimar la incidencia de diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) en pacientes mayores en los servicios de urgencias (SU), la confirmación diagnóstica de la ICA en pacientes hospitalizados y los eventos adversos a corto plazo. Método: Se incluyeron a todos los pacientes de ≥65 años atendidos en 52 SU españoles durante una semana y se seleccionaron los diagnosticados de ICA. En los hospitalizados se recogieron los diagnosticados de ICA al alta. Como eventos adversos, se recogió la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 30 días, y evento adverso combinado (muerte u hospitalización) a 30 días posalta. Se calcularon las odds ratio (OR) ajustadas de las características demográficas, de estado basal y a la llegada al SU asociadas con mortalidad y evento adverso posalta a 30 días. Resultados: Se incluyeron 1.155 pacientes con ICA (incidencia anual: 26,5 por 1.000 habitantes ≥65 años, IC95%: 25,0-28,1). En el 86%, el diagnóstico de ICA constaba al alta. La mortalidad global a 30 días fue del 10,7%, la intrahospitalaria del 7,9% y el evento combinado posalta del 15,6%. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 30 días se asoció con hipotensión arterial (OR ajustada: 74,0, IC95%: 5,39-1.015.; y 42,6, 3,74-485, respectivamente) e hipoxemia (2,14, 1,27-3,61; y 1,87, 1,19-2,93) a la llegada a urgencias y con precisar ayuda en la deambulación (2,24, 1,04-4,83; y 2,48, 1,27-4,86) y la edad (por cada incremento de 10 años; 1,54, 1,04-2,29, y 1,60, 1,13-2,28). Conclusiones: La ICA es un diagnóstico frecuente en los pacientes mayores que consultan en los SU. El deterioro funcional, la edad, la hipotensión e hipoxemia son los factores que más se asocian a mortalidad.(AU)

Objective: To estimate the incidence of acute heart failure (AHF) diagnosis in elderly patients in emergency departments (ED), diagnostic confirmation in hospitalized patients, and short-term adverse events. Methods: All patients aged ≥65 years attended in 52 Spanish EDs during 1 week were included and those diagnosed with AHF were selected. In hospitalized patients, those diagnosed with AHF at discharge were collected. As adverse events, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, and combined adverse event (death or hospitalization) at 30 days post-discharge were collected. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for association of demographic variables, baseline status and constants at ED arrival with mortality and 30-day post-discharge adverse event were calculated. Results: We included 1,155 patients with AHF (annual incidence: 26.5 per 1000 inhabitants ≥65 years, 95%CI: 25.0-28.1). In 86% the diagnosis of AHF was known at discharge. Overall 30-day mortality was 10.7% and in-hospital mortality was 7.9%, and the combined event in 15.6%. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was associated with arterial hypotension (adjusted OR: 74.0, 95%CI: 5.39-1015. and 42.6, 3.74-485, respectively and hypoxemia (2.14, 1.27-3.61; and 1.87, 1.19-2.93) on arrival at the ED and requiring assistance with ambulation (2.24, 1.04-4.83; and 2.48, 1.27-4.86) and age (per 10-year increment; 1.54, 1.04-2.29; and 1.60, 1.13-2.28). The combined post-discharge adverse event was not associated with any characteristic. Conclusions: AHF is a frequent diagnosis in elderly patients consulting in the ED. The functional impairment, age, hypotension and hypoxemia are the factors most associated with mortality.(AU)

Rendimiento diRendimiento diagnóstico de un algoritmo basado en ecografía clínica para el diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en pacientes que consultan en urgencias por disnea / Diagnostic performance of a clinical ultrasound-based algorithm for acute heart failure in patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea

Objetivos. Analizar el rendimiento diagnóstico de un algoritmo ecográfico que incluye el tiempo de desaceleración precoz del flujo mitral (TD) para establecer el diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) en pacientes que consultan en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) por disnea. Métodos. Análisis prospectivo de una muestra de conveniencia de pacientes que consultan por disnea aguda en un SUH. El algoritmo ecográfico incluyó la ecografía pulmonar y cuatro parámetros ecocardiográficos, se midió MAPSE (desplazamiento sistólico del plano del anillo mitral), medidas doppler de flujo mitral, medidas doppler tisular en el anillo mitral lateral y TD. El diagnóstico final fue asignado por 2 médicos ciegos entre sí y a los hallazgos ecográficos. Resultados. Se incluyeron 166 pacientes adultos, la edad media fue de 76 años (DE 13) y 79 eran mujeres (48%). Hubo 62 pacientes (37%) con un diagnóstico final de ICA. La concordancia entre asignadores fue buena para el diagnóstico de ICA (κ = 0,71). El algoritmo clasificó a todos los pacientes, no hubo ningún diagnóstico indeterminado. El rendimiento diagnóstico del algoritmo mostró un área bajo la curva de 0,91 (IC 95%: 0,86-0,96), sensibilidad del 87% (IC 95%: 76%-94%), especificidad del 95% (IC 95%: 89%-98%), razón de verosimilitud positiva del 18,1 (IC 95%: 7,7-42,8), razón de verosimilitud negativa del 0,14 (IC 95%: 0,07-0,26). Conclusiones. Un algoritmo ecográfico que incluye el TD tiene un buen rendimiento para el diagnóstico de ICA en pacientes que acuden a SUH por disnea. Además, el uso de TD permite clasificar a todos los pacientes. (AU)

Objective. To study the diagnostic performance of an ultrasound-based algorithm that includes the deceleration time (DT) of early mitral filling to establish a diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF) in patients who come to an emergency department because of dyspnea. Methods. Prospective analysis in a convenience sample of patients who came to a hospital emergency department with acute dyspnea. The algorithm included ultrasound findings and 4 echocardiographic findings as follows: mitral annular plane systolic excursion, Doppler mitral flow velocity, tissue Doppler imaging measure of the lateral annulus, and the DT of early mitral filling. The definitive diagnosis was made by 2 physicians blinded to each other’s diagnosis and the ultrasound findings. Results. A total of 166 adult patients with a mean (SD) age of 76 (13) years were included; 79 (48%) were women. AHF was the definitive diagnosis in 62 patients (37%). Diagnostic agreement was good between the 2 physicians (κ = 0.71). The algorithm classified all the patients, and there were no undetermined diagnoses. Diagnostic performance indicators for the ultrasound-based algorithm integrating early DT findings were as follows: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96); sensitivity, 87% (95% CI, 76%-94%); specificity, 95% (95% CI, 89%-98%); positive likelihood ratio, 18.1 (95% CI, 7.7-42.8); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.14 (95% CI, 0.07-0.26). Conclusions. The ultrasound-based algorithm integrating the DT of early mitral filling performs well for diagnosing AHF in emergency patients with dyspnea. The inclusion of early DT allows all patients to be diagnosed. (AU)

Diagnostic performance of a clinical ultrasound-based algorithm for acute heart failure in patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea. / Rendimiento diagnóstico de un algoritmo basado en ecografía clínica para el diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en pacientes que consultan en urgencias por disnea.

OBJECTIVES: To study the diagnostic performance of an ultrasound-based algorithm that includes the deceleration time (DT) of early mitral filling to establish a diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF) in patients who come to an emergency department because of dyspnea. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective analysis in a convenience sample of patients who came to a hospital emergency department with acute dyspnea. The algorithm included ultrasound findings and 4 echocardiographic findings as follows: mitral annular plane systolic excursion, Doppler mitral flow velocity, tissue Doppler imaging measure of the lateral annulus, and the DT of early mitral filling. The definitive diagnosis was made by 2 physicians blinded to each other's diagnosis and the ultrasound findings. RESULTS: A total of 166 adult patients with a mean (SD) age of 76 (13) years were included; 79 (48%) were women. AHF was the definitive diagnosis in 62 patients (37%). Diagnostic agreement was good between the 2 physicians (κ = 0.71). The algorithm classified all the patients, and there were no undetermined diagnoses. Diagnostic performance indicators for the ultrasound-based algorithm integrating early DT findings were as follows: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96); sensitivity, 87% (95% CI, 76%-94%); specificity, 95% (95% CI, 89%-98%); positive likelihood ratio, 18.1 (95% CI, 7.7-42.8); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.14 (95% CI, 0.07-0.26). CONCLUSION: The ultrasound-based algorithm integrating the DT of early mitral filling performs well for diagnosing AHF in emergency patients with dyspnea. The inclusion of early DT allows all patients to be diagnosed.

OBJETIVO: Analizar el rendimiento diagnóstico de un algoritmo ecográfico que incluye el tiempo de desaceleración precoz del flujo mitral (TD) para establecer el diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) en pacientes que consultan en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) por disnea. METODO: Análisis prospectivo de una muestra de conveniencia de pacientes que consultan por disnea aguda en un SUH. El algoritmo ecográfico incluyó la ecografía pulmonar y cuatro parámetros ecocardiográficos, se midió MAPSE (desplazamiento sistólico del plano del anillo mitral), medidas doppler de flujo mitral, medidas doppler tisular en el anillo mitral lateral y TD. El diagnóstico final fue asignado por 2 médicos ciegos entre sí y a los hallazgos ecográficos. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 166 pacientes adultos, la edad media fue de 76 años (DE 13) y 79 eran mujeres (48%). Hubo 62 pacientes (37%) con un diagnóstico final de ICA. La concordancia entre asignadores fue buena para el diagnóstico de ICA (κ = 0,71). El algoritmo clasificó a todos los pacientes, no hubo ningún diagnóstico indeterminado. El rendimiento diagnóstico del algoritmo mostró un área bajo la curva de 0,91 (IC 95%: 0,86-0,96), sensibilidad del 87% (IC 95%: 76%-94%), especificidad del 95% (IC 95%: 89%-98%), razón de verosimilitud positiva del 18,1 (IC 95%: 7,7-42,8), razón de verosimilitud negativa del 0,14 (IC 95%: 0,07-0,26). CONCLUSIONES: Un algoritmo ecográfico que incluye el TD tiene un buen rendimiento para el diagnóstico de ICA en pacientes que acuden a SUH por disnea. Además, el uso de TD permite clasificar a todos los pacientes.

Consensus on the approach to hydrosaline overload in acute heart failure. SEMI/SEC/S.E.N. recommendations.

Most of the signs and symptoms of heart failure can be explained by fluid overload, which is also related to disease progression. Fluid overload is a complex phenomenon that extends beyond increased intravascular pressures and poses challenges for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. Current recommendations advise a multiparametric approach, including clinical data (symptoms/signs), imaging tests, and biomarkers. This article proposes a practical therapeutic approach to managing hydrosaline overload in heart failure in both inpatient and outpatient settings. This document is an initiative of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) in collaboration with the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC) and the Spanish Society of Nephrology (S.E.N.).

Epidemiological aspects, clinical management and short-term outcomes in elderly patients diagnosed with acute heart failure in the emergency department in Spain: results of the EDEN-34 study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of acute heart failure (AHF) diagnosis in elderly patients in emergency departments (ED), diagnostic confirmation in hospitalized patients, and short-term adverse events. METHODS: All patients aged ≥65 years attended in 52 Spanish EDs during 1 week were included and those diagnosed with AHF were selected. In hospitalized patients, those diagnosed with AHF at discharge were collected. As adverse events, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, and combined adverse event (death or hospitalization) at 30 days post-discharge were collected. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for association of demographic variables, baseline status and constants at ED arrival with mortality and 30-day post-discharge adverse event were calculated. RESULTS: We included 1,155 patients with AHF (annual incidence: 26.5 per 1000 inhabitants ≥65 years, 95% CI: 25.0-28.1). In 86% the diagnosis of AHF was known at discharge. Overall 30-day mortality was 10.7% and in-hospital mortality was 7.9%, and the combined event in 15.6%. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was associated with arterial hypotension (adjusted OR: 74.0, 95% CI: 5.39-1015. and 42.6, 3.74-485, respectively and hypoxemia (2.14, 1.27-3.61; and 1.87, 1.19-2.93) on arrival at the ED and requiring assistance with ambulation (2.24, 1.04-4.83; and 2.48, 1.27-4.86) and age (per 10-year increment; 1.54, 1.04-2.29; and 1.60, 1.13-2.28). The combined post-discharge adverse event was not associated with any characteristic. CONCLUSIONS: AHF is a frequent diagnosis in elderly patients consulting in the ED. The functional impairment, age, hypotension and hypoxemia are the factors most associated with mortality.

Use of digoxin in the emergency department to treat patients with acute heart failure and its impact on short-term outcomes. / Uso de digoxina endovenosa en urgencias para tratar pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda y su impacto en la evolución a corto plazo.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze factors related to the use of digoxin to treat patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in emergency departments (EDs) and the impact of digoxin treatment on short-term outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with AHF in 45 Spanish EDs. The patients, who were not undergoing long-term treatment for heart failure, were classified according to whether or not they were given intravenous digoxin in the ED. Fifty-one patient or cardiac decompensation episode variables were recorded to profile ED patients treated with digoxin. Outcome variables studied were the need for hospital admission, prolonged stay in the ED (> 24 hours) for discharged patients, prolonged hospitalization (> 7 days) for admitted patients, and all-cause in-hospital or 30-day mortality. The associations between digoxin treatment and the outcomes were studied with odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for patient and AHF episode characteristics. RESULTS: Data for 15 549 patients (median age, 83 years; 55% women) were analyzed; 1430 (9.2%) were treated with digoxin. Digoxin was used more often in women, young patients, and those with better New York Heart Association (NYHA) classifications but more severe cardiac decompensation, especially if the trigger was atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Admissions were ordered for 75.4% of the patients overall (81.6% of digoxin-treated patients vs 74.8% of nontreated patients; P .001). The ED stay was prolonged in 38.3% of patients discharged from the ED (52.9% of digoxin-treated patients vs 37.2% of nontreated patients; P .001). The duration of hospital stay was prolonged in 48.1% (digoxin-treated, 49.3% vs 47.9%; P = .385). In-hospital mortality was 7.2% overall (6.9% vs 7.2%, P= .712), and 30-day mortality was 9.7% (9.3% vs 9.7%, P = .625). ED use of digoxin was associated with a prolonged stay in the department (adjusted OR, 1.883; 95% CI, 1.359-2.608) but not with hospitalization or mortality. CONCLUSION: Digoxin continues to be used in one out of ten ED patients who are not already on long-term treatment with the drug. Digoxin use is associated with cardiac decompensation triggered by atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, younger age, women, and patients with better initial NYHA function status but possibly more severe decompensation. Digoxin use leads to a longer ED stay but is safe, as it is not associated with need for admission, prolonged hospitalization, or short-term mortality.

OBJETIVO: Analizar los factores relacionados con el uso de digoxina en urgencias en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) y el impacto pronóstico a corto plazo. METODO: Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en 45 servicios de urgencias españoles sin tratamiento crónico con digoxina, los cuales se dividieron según recibiesen digoxina endovenosa en urgencias o no. Se recogieron 51 variables relativas al paciente o al episodio de descompensación y se investigó el perfil del paciente tratado con digoxina en urgencias. Como variables evolutivas se investigaron la necesidad de ingreso, la estancia en urgencias prolongada (> 24 horas) en dados de alta y la hospitalización prolongada (> 7 días) en ingresados, y la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 30 días por cualquier causa. Se analizó si el tratamiento con digoxina se asoció a diferencias evolutivas, de forma cruda y ajustada a las características del paciente y el episodio de ICA. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 15.549 pacientes (mediana = 83 años, mujeres = 55%), de los que 1.430 (9,2%) fueron tratados con digoxina. La digoxina se utilizó más en mujeres, pacientes jóvenes, en mejor clase funcional de la New York Heart Association (NYHA), pero con descompensaciones más graves y, sobre todo, cuando existía una fibrilación auricular (FA) con respuesta ventricular rápida como desencadenante. Se hospitalizó el 75,4% de pacientes (más frecuente en tratados con digoxina; 81,6% vs 74,8%, p 0,001), tuvo estancia prolongada en urgencias el 38,3% (52,9% vs 37,2%, p 0,001), hospitalización prolongada el 48,1% (49,3% vs 47,9%, p = 0,385), mortalidad intrahospitalaria el 7,2% (6,9% vs 7,2%, p = 0,712) y a 30 días el 9,7% (9,3% vs 9,7%, p = 0,625). El modelo ajustado mostró que el uso de digoxina en urgencias sólo se asoció con estancia prolongada en urgencias (OR = 1,883, IC 95% = 1,359-2,608), pero no con la necesidad de ingreso, hospitalización prolongada o mortalidad. CONCLUSIONES: La digoxina continúa utilizándose en uno de cada 10 pacientes con ICA atendidos en urgencias que no utilizaban este fármaco de manera habitual. Su uso se relaciona con un paciente cuya ICA ha sido descompensada por una FA con respuesta ventricular rápida, más joven y más frecuentemente mujer, en mejor clase funcional de la NYHA basal y con una descompensación posiblemente más grave. El uso de digoxina conlleva una estancia en urgencias más prolongada, pero su uso es seguro, pues no se asocia a la necesidad de ingreso, hospitalización prolongada o mortalidad a corto plazo.

Urinary catheterization of patients with acute heart failure in a hospital emergency department: a factor associated with prognosis. / El sondaje vesical de los pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario se asocia al pronóstico.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether urinary catheterization in a hospital emergency department (ED) affects short-term prognosis in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively recorded baseline and other clinical data in a consecutive cohort of ED patients treated for AHF. Crude and adjusted associations were calculated between catheterization and a primary composite outcome (30-day readmission for AHF and/or death) and secondary outcomes (in-hospital mortality, urinary tract infection [UTI], and duration of hospital stay.). RESULTS: Nine hundred ninety-one patients were admitted for AHF. The mean (SD) age was 66 (10.5) years; 71% were women. Catheterization was required for 29.2% in the ED. The primary composite outcome was observed in 7.7% of the patients who were not catheterized and 12.8% of the catheterized patients (P = .02). In-hospital mortality occurred in 5.9% and 9.7% of non-catheterized and catheterized patients, respectively (P = .04), and UTIs occurred in 19.1% and 26.6% (P = .01). Twelve of the non-catheterized patients (1.7%) were readmitted for AHF (vs 11 (3.8%) of the catheterized patients (P = .06), and there were no differences between the groups in hospital stay (11 vs 10.9 days, P = .78). In the adjusted analysis of associations between catheterization and the primary outcome the odds and hazard ratios (OR and HR, respectively) were OR, 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1-2.7) (P = .02) and HR, 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.5) (P = .03). For secondary outcomes, significant associations emerged between catheterization and UTIs (OR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1-2.2]; P = .008) and readmission for AHF (OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 1.2-7.3]; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Routine insertion of a urinary catheter in patients with AHF in the ED is associated with worse 30-day clinical outcomes.

OBJETIVO: Analizar si el sondaje vesical (SV) rutinario en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) de pacientes diagnosticados de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) está asociado con la evolución a corto plazo. METODO: Se recogieron prospectivamente datos basales y clínicos de una cohorte de pacientes consecutivos que ingresaron por ICA. Se analizó la asociación cruda y ajustada del SV con el evento combinado de muerte o reingreso por insuficiencia cardiaca a 30 días (objetivo primario), así como mortalidad intrahospitalaria, infección del tracto urinario (ITU) y estancia hospitalaria (objetivos secundarios). RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 991 pacientes hospitalizados por ICA, la edad media fue de 66 años (DE 10,5) y el 71% fueron mujeres. Un 29,2% de los pacientes requirieron SV en el SUH. El evento combinado fue del 7,7% para el grupo no SV y 12,8% para grupo SV (p = 0,02); mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue del 5,9% en el grupo no SV y 9,7% en el grupo SV (p = 0,04); se diagnosticó ITU en el 19,1% de pacientes en el grupo no SV y en el 26,6% en el grupo SV (p = 0,01). A 30 días, 12 pacientes (1,7%) reingresaron por insuficiencia cardiaca en el grupo no SV versus 11 (3,8%) pacientes en el grupo SV (p = 0,06). No hubo diferencias en la estancia hospitalaria (11 versus 10,9 días); p = 0,78). En el análisis ajustado, el SV se asoció con el objetivo primario; [OR = 1,7 (IC 95%: 1,1-2,7; p = 0,02); HR = 1,6 (IC 95%: 1,1-2,5; p = 0,03)]; con la ITU (OR = 1,8; IC 95%: 1,1­2,2; p = 0,008) y con el reingreso por insuficiencia cardiaca (OR = 2,9; IC 95%: 1,2-7,3; p = 0,02). CONCLUSIONES: La inserción rutinaria del SV en el SUH en pacientes con ICA se asoció a peores resultados clínicos a los 30 días.

Uso de digoxina endovenosa en urgencias para tratar pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda y su impacto en la evolución a corto plazo / Use of digoxin in the emergency department to treat patients with acute heart failure and its impact on short-term outcomes

Objetivos: Analizar los factores relacionados con el uso de digoxina en urgencias en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) y el impacto pronóstico a corto plazo. Método: Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en 45 servicios de urgencias españoles sin tratamiento crónico con digoxina, los cuales se dividieron según recibiesen digoxina endovenosa en urgencias o no. Se recogieron 51 variables relativas al paciente o al episodio de descompensación y se investigó el perfil del paciente tratado con digoxina en urgencias. Como variables evolutivas se investigaron la necesidad de ingreso, la estancia en urgencias prolongada (> 24 horas) en dados de alta y la hospitalización prolongada (> 7 días) en ingresados, y la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 30 días por cualquier causa. Se analizó si el tratamiento con digoxina se asoció a diferencias evolutivas, de forma cruda y ajustada a las características del paciente y el episodio de ICA. Resultados: Se analizaron 15.549 pacientes (mediana = 83 años, mujeres = 55%), de los que 1.430 (9,2%) fueron tratados con digoxina. La digoxina se utilizó más en mujeres, pacientes jóvenes, en mejor clase funcional de la New York Heart Association (NYHA), pero con descompensaciones más graves y, sobre todo, cuando existía una fibrilación auricular (FA) con respuesta ventricular rápida como desencadenante. Se hospitalizó el 75,4% de pacientes (más frecuente en tratados con digoxina; 81,6% vs 74,8%, p < 0,001), tuvo estancia prolongada en urgencias el 38,3% (52,9% vs 37,2%, p < 0,001), hospitalización prolongada el 48,1% (49,3% vs 47,9%, p = 0,385), mortalidad intrahospitalaria el 7,2% (6,9% vs 7,2%, p = 0,712) y a 30 días el 9,7% (9,3% vs 9,7%, p = 0,625). El modelo ajustado mostró que el uso de digoxina en urgencias sólo se asoció con estancia prolongada en urgencias (OR = 1,883, IC 95% = 1,359-2,608), pero no con la necesidad de ingreso, hospitalización prolongada o mortalidad. (AU)

Objectives: To analyze factors related to the use of digoxin to treat patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in emergency departments (EDs) and the impact of digoxin treatment on short-term outcomes. Methods: We included patients diagnosed with AHF in 45 Spanish EDs. The patients, who were not undergoing long-term treatment for heart failure, were classified according to whether or not they were given intravenous digoxin in the ED. Fifty-one patient or cardiac decompensation episode variables were recorded to profile ED patients treated with digoxin. Outcome variables studied were the need for hospital admission, prolonged stay in the ED (> 24 hours) for discharged patients, prolonged hospitalization (> 7 days) for admitted patients, and all-cause in-hospital or 30-day mortality. The associations between digoxin treatment and the outcomes were studied with odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for patient and AHF episode characteristics. Results: Data for 15 549 patients (median age, 83 years; 55% women) were analyzed; 1430 (9.2%) were treated with digoxin. Digoxin was used more often in women, young patients, and those with better New York Heart Association (NYHA) classifications but more severe cardiac decompensation, especially if the trigger was atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Admissions were ordered for 75.4% of the patients overall (81.6% of digoxin-treated patients vs 74.8% of nontreated patients; P < .001). The ED stay was prolonged in 38.3% of patients discharged from the ED (52.9% of digoxin-treated patients vs 37.2% of nontreated patients; P < .001). The duration of hospital stay was prolonged in 48.1% (digoxin-treated, 49.3% vs 47.9%; P = .385). In-hospital mortality was 7.2% overall (6.9% vs 7.2%, P= .712), and 30-day mortality was 9.7% (9.3% vs 9.7%, P = .625). ED use of digoxin was associated with a prolonged stay in the department (adjusted OR, 1.883; 95% CI, 1.359-2.608) but not with hospitalization or mortality. (AU)

Factores asociados al tratamiento crónico no justificado con digoxina en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda y relación con el pronóstico a corto plazo / Factors associated with unjustified chronic treatment with digoxin in patients with acute heart failure and relationship with short-term prognosis

Objetivos Analizar los factores relacionados con el tratamiento crónico inadecuado con digoxina, y si esta inadecuación impacta en la evolución a corto plazo. Método Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) en tratamiento crónico con digoxina, y se clasificaron como con tratamiento indicado o no indicado, investigándose los factores asociados a este hecho, y si se asociaba a mortalidad intrahospitalaria a 30 días, estancia hospitalaria prolongada (>7 días) y evento adverso combinado (reconsulta a urgencias, hospitalización por ICA o muerte por cualquier causa) durante los 30 días postalta. Resultados Se analizaron 2.366 pacientes en tratamiento crónico con digoxina (mediana=83 años, mujeres=61%): adecuado en 1.373 casos (58,0%), inadecuado en 993 (42,0%). La inadecuación se asoció con mayor edad, menor comorbilidad, menor tratamiento con betabloqueantes e IECA, mejor función ventricular y peor índice de Barthel. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 30 días fue mayor en pacientes con tratamiento inadecuado (9,9 versus 7,6%, p=0,05; y 12,6 versus 9,1%, p<0,001; respectivamente); no hubo diferencias en estancia prolongada (35,7 versus 33,8%) ni en eventos adversos posalta (32,9 versus 31,8%). Ajustando las diferencias basales y del episodio de descompensación, el tratamiento crónico inadecuado con digoxina no se asoció con ningún resultado, con odds ratio de 1,31 (IC 95%: 0,85-2,03) para mortalidad intrahospitalaria, 1,29 (0,74-2,25) para mortalidad a 30 días; 1,07 (0,82-1,40) para estancia prolongada y 0,88 (0,65-1,19) para evento adverso posalta. Conclusión Existe un perfil de paciente que recibe de forma inadecuada tratamiento crónico con digoxina, si bien ello no se asocia con resultados adversos a corto plazo durante los episodios de ICA (AU)

Objectives To analyze the factors related to inadequate chronic treatment with digoxin and whether the inadequacy of treatment has an impact on short-term outcome. Method Patients diagnosed with AHF who were in chronic treatment with digoxin were selected. Digoxin treatment was classified as adequate or inadequate. We investigated factors associated to inadequacy and whether such inadequacy was associated with in-hospital and 30-day mortality, prolonged hospital stay (>7 days) and combined adverse event (re-consultation to the ED or hospitalization for AHF or death from any cause) during the 30 days after discharge. Results We analyzed 2366 patients on chronic digoxin treatment (median age=83 years, women=61%), which was considered adequate in 1373 cases (58.0%) and inadequate in 993 (42.0%). The inadequacy was associated with older age, less comorbidity, less treatment with beta-blockers and renin–angiotensin inhibitors, better ventricular function, and worse Barthel index. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was higher in patients with inadequate digoxin treatment (9.9% vs. 7.6%, p=0.05; and 12.6% vs. 9.1%, p<0.001, respectively). No differences were recorded in prolonged stay (35.7% vs. 33.8%) or post-discharge adverse events (32.9% vs. 31.8%). In the model adjusted for baseline and decompensation episode differences, inadequate treatment with digoxin was not significantly associated with any outcome, with an odds ratio of 1.31 (95% CI=0.85-2.03) for in-hospital mortality; 1.29 (0.74-2.25) for 30-day mortality; 1.07 (0.82-1.40) for prolonged stay; and 0.88 (0.65-1.19) for post-discharge adverse event. Conclusion There is a profile of patients with AHF who inadequately receive digoxin, although this inadequateness for chronic digitalis treatment was not associated with short-term adverse outcomes (AU)

Resumen ejecutivo de la actualización 2023 del consenso de actuación básica durante el ingreso hospitalario por insuficiencia cardiaca aguda / Executive summary of the 2023 update on the consensus regarding basic conduct during hospital admission for patients with acute heart failure

La insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) está asociada a una importante morbimortalidad, constituyendo la primera causa de hospitalización en mayores de 65 años en nuestro país. Las principales recomendaciones recogidas son: 1) al ingreso, se recomienda realizar una evaluación integral, considerando el tratamiento habitual y comorbilidades, ya que condicionan el pronóstico; 2) en las primeras horas de atención hospitalaria, el tratamiento descongestivo es prioritario, y se recomienda un abordaje terapéutico diurético precoz y escalonado en función de la respuesta; 3) durante la fase estable, se recomienda considerar el inicio y/o titulación del tratamiento con fármacos basados en la evidencia, es decir, sacubitrilo/valsartán o inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina/antagonistas de los receptores de angiotensina II, betabloqueantes, antialdosterónicos e inhibidores SGLT2, y 4) en el momento del alta hospitalaria, es recomendable utilizar un listado —tipo check-list— para optimizar el manejo del paciente hospitalizado e identificar las opciones más eficientes para mantener la continuidad de cuidados tras el alta (AU)

Acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and it stands as the primary cause of hospitalization for individuals over the age of 65 in Spain. This document outlines the main recommendations as follows: (1) upon admission, it is crucial to conduct a comprehensive assessment, taking into account the patient's standard treatment and comorbidities, as these factors determine the prognosis of the disease; (2) During the initial hours of hospital care, prioritizing decongestive treatment is essential. It is recommended to adopt an early staged diuretic therapeutic approach based on the patient's response; (3) In order to manage patients in the stable phase, it is advisable to consider initiating and/or adjusting evidence-based drug treatments such as sacubitril/valsartan or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta blockers, aldosterone antagonists, and SGLT2 inhibitors; (4) Upon hospital discharge, utilizing a checklist is recommended to optimize the patient's management and identify the most efficient options for ensuring continuity of care post-discharge (AU)

Factors associated with unjustified chronic treatment with digoxin in patients with acute heart failure and relationship with short-term prognosis.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the factors related to inadequate chronic treatment with digoxin and whether the inadequacy of treatment has an impact on short-term outcome. METHOD: Patients diagnosed with AHF who were in chronic treatment with digoxin, were selected. Digoxin treatment was classified as adequate or inadequate. We investigated factors associated to inadequacy and whether such inadequacy was associated with in-hospital and 30-day mortality, prolonged hospital stay (>7 days) and combined adverse event (re-consultation to the ED or hospitalization for AHF or death from any cause) during the 30 days after discharge. RESULTS: We analyzed 2,366 patients on chronic digoxin treatment (median age = 83 years, women = 61%), which was considered adequate in 1,373 cases (58.0%) and inadequate in 993 (42.0%). The inadequacy was associated with older age, less comorbidity, less treatment with beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin inhibitors, better ventricular function, and worse Barthel index. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was higher in patients with inadequate digoxin treatment (9.9% versus 7.6%, p = 0.05; and 12.6% versus 9.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). No differences were recorded in prolonged stay (35.7% versus 33.8%) or post-discharge adverse events (32.9% versus 31.8%). In the model adjusted for baseline and decompensation episode differences, inadequate treatment with digoxin was not significantly associated with any outcome, with an odds ratio of 1.31 (95%CI = 0.85-2.03) for in-hospital mortality; 1.29 (0.74-2.25) for 30-day mortality; 1.07 (0.82-1.40) for prolonged stay; and 0.88 (0.65-1.19) for post-discharge adverse event. CONCLUSION: There is a profile of patients with AHF who inadequately receive digoxin, although this inadequateness for chronic digitalis treatment was not associated with short-term adverse outcomes.

Decisión de hospitalización o alta en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en urgencias, su adecuación con la gravedad de la descompensación e impacto pronóstico / Decisions to admit vs. discharge patients with acute heart failure from the emergency department: consistency with a measure of severity of decompensation and the impact on prognosis

Objetivos. Analizar cómo se ajusta la decisión de ingreso o alta del paciente con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) atendido en urgencias a su riesgo de evento adverso, así como su impacto en el pronóstico en aquellos dados de alta desde urgencias. Método. Se recogieron datos basales y clínicos de pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en 16 servicios de urgencias españoles. Los pacientes se estratificaron según la gravedad de la descompensación mediante la escala MEESSI y se analizó la distribución de dicha gravedad en hospitalizados (en conjunto, e individualmente para los servicios con mayor número de hospitalizaciones) y dados de alta desde urgencias. En este último grupo, se analizó el cumplimiento de los siguientes indicadores de calidad: mortalidad por cualquier causa a 30 días (< 2%), reconsulta a urgencias por ICA a 7 días posalta (< 10%), y reconsulta a urgencias u hospitalización por ICA a 30 días posalta (< 20%). Resultados. Se incluyeron 2.855 pacientes (edad mediana = 84 años, RIC = 76-88; mujeres = 54%): 1.042 pacientes (36,5%) de riesgo bajo, 1.239 (43,4%) intermedio, 301 (10,5%) alto y 273 (9,6%) muy alto. La mortalidad a 30 días por categorías de riesgo fue 1,9%, 9,3%, 15,3% y 38,4%, respectivamente; la mortalidad al año 15,4%, 35,6%, 52,0% y 74,2%; y la hospitalización 62,2%, 77,4%, 87,0% y 88,3%. El 47,1% de pacientes dados de alta de urgencias tenía un riesgo incrementado (intermedio, alto o muy alto) y el 30,7% de hospitalizados eran de bajo riesgo. La gravedad de la descompensación según el servicio de hospitalización se incrementaba en el siguiente orden: medicina interna, corta estancia, cardiología, intensivos y geriatría. (AU)

Objectives: To analyze the consistency between decisions to discharge or admit patients with acute heart failure (AHF) treated in emergency departments (EDs) and the level of risk of adverse events, and to analyze the impact of decisions to discharge patients. Material and methods: Prospective study of baseline clinical data collected from patients diagnosed with AHF in 16 Spanish emergency departments. Patients were stratified by severity of decompensated AHF based on MEESSI assessment (Multiple Estimation of Risk Based on the Spanish Emergency Department Score). The distribution of severity was described for patients who were hospitalized (overall and for departments receiving the largest number of admissions) and for discharged patients. We analyzed the data for discharged patients for associations with the following quality-of-care indicators: all-cause mortality of less than 2% at 30 days, revisits to the ED for AHF in less than 10% of patients within 7 days of discharge, and revisits to the ED or admission for AHF in less than 20% within 30 days of discharge. Results: We included 2855 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 84 (76-88) years. Fifty-four percent were women, 1042 (36.5%) were classified as low risk, 1239 (43.4%) as intermediate risk, 301 (10.5%) as high risk, and 273 (9.6%) as very high risk. Thirty-day mortality rates by level of low to very high risk were 1.9%, 9.3%, 15.3%, and 38.4%, respectively. One-year mortality rates by risk level were 15.4%, 35.6%, 52.0%, and 74.2%. Admission rates by risk level were 62.2%, 77.4%, 87.0%, and 88.3%. Overall, 47.1% o patients discharged from the ED were in the 3 higher-risk categories (intermediate to very high), and 30.7% were in the lowest risk category. The 5 hospital areas receiving the most admissions, in order of lowest-to-highest risk classification, were internal medicine, the short-stay unit, cardiology, intensive care, and geriatrics. (AU)

Decisions to admit vs. discharge patients with acute heart failure from the emergency department: consistency with a measure of severity of decompensation and the impact on prognosis. / Decisión de hospitalización o alta en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en urgencias, su adecuación con la gravedad de la descompensación e impacto pronóstico.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the consistency between decisions to discharge or admit patients with acute heart failure (AHF) treated in emergency departments (EDs) and the level of risk of adverse events, and to analyze the impact of decisions to discharge patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study of baseline clinical data collected from patients diagnosed with AHF in 16 Spanish emergency departments. Patients were stratified by severity of decompensated AHF based on MEESSI assessment (Multiple Estimation of Risk Based on the Spanish Emergency Department Score). The distribution of severity was described for patients who were hospitalized (overall and for departments receiving the largest number of admissions) and for discharged patients. We analyzed the data for discharged patients for associations with the following quality-of-care indicators: all-cause mortality of less than 2% at 30 days, revisits to the ED for AHF in less than 10% of patients within 7 days of discharge, and revisits to the ED or admission for AHF in less than 20% within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: We included 2855 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 84 (76-88) years. Fifty-four percent were women, 1042 (36.5%) were classified as low risk, 1239 (43.4%) as intermediate risk, 301 (10.5%) as high risk, and 273 (9.6%) as very high risk. Thirty-day mortality rates by level of low to very high risk were 1.9%, 9.3%, 15.3%, and 38.4%, respectively. One-year mortality rates by risk level were 15.4%, 35.6%, 52.0%, and 74.2%. Admission rates by risk level were 62.2%, 77.4%, 87.0%, and 88.3%. Overall, 47.1% o patients discharged from the ED were in the 3 higher-risk categories (intermediate to very high), and 30.7% were in the lowest risk category. The 5 hospital areas receiving the most admissions, in order of lowest-to-highest risk classification, were internal medicine, the short-stay unit, cardiology, intensive care, and geriatrics. Rates and 95% CIs for quality-of-care indicators in patients discharged from EDs were as follows: 30-day mortality, 4.3% (3.0%-6.1%); ED revisits within 7 days, 11.4% (9.2%-14.0%), and ED revisits or admissions within 30 days, 31.5% (28.0%-35.1%). In patients classified as low risk on ED discharge, these percentages were lower, as follows, respectively: 0.5% (0.1%-1.8%), 10.5% (7.6%-14.0%), and 29.5% (26.6%-32.6%). CONCLUSION: We detected disparity between severity of AHF decompensation and the decision to discharge or admit patients. Outcomes in patients discharged from EDs do not reach the recommended quality-of-care standards. Reducing inconsistencies between severity of decompensation and ED decisions could help to improve quality targets.

OBJETIVO: Analizar cómo se ajusta la decisión de ingreso o alta del paciente con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) atendido en urgencias a su riesgo de evento adverso, así como su impacto en el pronóstico en aquellos dados de alta desde urgencias. METODO: Se recogieron datos basales y clínicos de pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en 16 servicios de urgencias españoles. Los pacientes se estratificaron según la gravedad de la descompensación mediante la escala MEESSI y se analizó la distribución de dicha gravedad en hospitalizados (en conjunto, e individualmente para los servicios con mayor número de hospitalizaciones) y dados de alta desde urgencias. En este último grupo, se analizó el cumplimiento de los siguientes indicadores de calidad: mortalidad por cualquier causa a 30 días ( 2%), reconsulta a urgencias por ICA a 7 días posalta ( 10%), y reconsulta a urgencias u hospitalización por ICA a 30 días posalta ( 20%). RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 2.855 pacientes (edad mediana = 84 años, RIC = 76-88; mujeres = 54%): 1.042 pacientes (36,5%) de riesgo bajo, 1.239 (43,4%) intermedio, 301 (10,5%) alto y 273 (9,6%) muy alto. La mortalidad a 30 días por categorías de riesgo fue 1,9%, 9,3%, 15,3% y 38,4%, respectivamente; la mortalidad al año 15,4%, 35,6%, 52,0% y 74,2%; y la hospitalización 62,2%, 77,4%, 87,0% y 88,3%. El 47,1% de pacientes dados de alta de urgencias tenía un riesgo incrementado (intermedio, alto o muy alto) y el 30,7% de hospitalizados eran de bajo riesgo. La gravedad de la descompensación según el servicio de hospitalización se incrementaba en el siguiente orden: medicina interna, corta estancia, cardiología, intensivos y geriatría. El 4,3% de pacientes dados de alta de urgencias (IC 95%: 3,0-6,1) falleció a los 30 días, el 11,4% (9,2-14,0) reconsultó en urgencias a los 7 días, y el 31,5% (28,0-35,1) reconsultó en urgencias o se hospitalizó a los 30 días. Si sólo se consideran los pacientes dados de alta de bajo riesgo, estos porcentajes descienden al 0,5% (0,1-1,8), 10,5% (7,6-14,0) y 29,5% (26,6-32,6), respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: Existe disparidad entre la gravedad de la descompensación y la decisión en urgencias de hospitalizar o dar de alta a los pacientes con ICA. Los resultados que se obtienen en los pacientes dados de alta desde urgencias no alcanzan los estándares de calidad recomendados. Disminuir las incongruencias entre gravedad de la descompensación y toma de decisión podría contribuir a cumplir con estos estándares.

Análisis de la relación entre la contaminación del aire ambiente y la gravedad de las descompensaciones por insuficiencia cardiaca en dos metrópolis españolas (Barcelona y Madrid) / Analysis of the relationship between ambient air pollution and the severity of heart failure decompensations in two Spanish metropolises (Barcelona and Madrid)

Se estudiaron pacientes con IC descompensada en urgencias de 4 hospitales de Barcelona y 3 de Madrid. Se recogieron datos clínicos (edad, sexo, comorbilidades, situación funcional basal), atmosféricos (temperatura, presión atmosférica) y de contaminantes (SO2, NO2, CO, O3, PM10, PM2,5) el día de atención en urgencias. La gravedad de la descompensación se estimó mediante la mortalidad a 7 días (indicador primario) y la necesidad de hospitalización, mortalidad intrahospitalaria y hospitalización prolongada (indicadores secundarios). Se investigó la asociación ajustada por datos clínicos, atmosféricos y ciudad entre concentración de contaminantes y gravedad, mediante regresión logística (asunción de linealidad) y curvas spline cúbicas restringidas (no asunción de linealidad). Resultados Se incluyeron 5.292 descompensaciones, con edad mediana de 83 años (RIC=76-88) y 56% mujeres. Las medianas (RIC) de los promedios diarios de contaminantes fueron: SO2=2,5μg/m3 (1,4-7,0), NO2=43μg/m3 (34-57), CO=0,48mg/m3 (0,35-0,63), O3=35μg/m3 (25-48), PM10=22μg/m3 (15-31) y PM2,5=12μg/m3 (8-17). La mortalidad a 7 días fue del 3,9%, y la hospitalización, la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y la hospitalización prolongada, del 78,9, 6,9 y 47,5%, respectivamente. El SO2 fue el único contaminante que mostró asociación lineal con la gravedad de la descompensación, ya que cada unidad de incremento supuso una OR para necesidad de hospitalización de 1,04 (IC 95% 1,01-1,08). El estudio mediante curvas spline cúbicas restringidas tampoco mostró asociaciones nítidas entre contaminantes y gravedad, excepto para SO2 y hospitalización, con OR de 1,55 (IC 95% 1,01-2,36) y de 2,71 (IC 95% 1,13-6,49) para concentraciones de 15 y 24μg/m3, respectivamente, en relación con una concentración de referencia de 5μg/m3 (AU)

Objectives To analyze whether the high levels of air pollutants are related to a greater severity of decompensated heart failure (HF). Method Patients diagnosed with decompensated HF in the emergency department of 4 hospitals in Barcelona and 3 in Madrid were included. Clinical data (age, sex, comorbidities, baseline functional status), atmospheric (temperature, atmospheric pressure) and pollutant data (SO2, NO2, CO, O3, PM10, PM2.5) were collected in the city on the day of emergency care. The severity of decompensation was estimated using 7-day mortality (primary indicator) and the need for hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and prolonged hospitalization (secondary indicators). The association adjusted for clinical, atmospheric and city data between pollutant concentration and severity was investigated using linear regression (linearity assumption) and restricted cubic spline curves (no linearity assumption). Results A total of 5292 decompensations were included, with a median age of 83 years (IQR=76-88) and 56% women. The medians (IQR) of the daily pollutant averages were: SO2=2.5μg/m3 (1.4-7.0), NO2=43μg/m3 (34-57), CO=0.48mg/m3 (0.35-0.63), O3=35μg/m3 (25-48), PM10=22μg/m3 (15-31) and PM2.5=12μg/m3 (8-17). Mortality at 7 days was 3.9%, and hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and prolonged hospitalization were 78.9, 6.9, and 47.5%, respectively. SO2 was the only pollutant that showed a linear association with the severity of decompensation, since each unit of increase implied an OR for the need for hospitalization of 1.04 (95% CI 1.01-1.08). The restricted cubic spline curves study also did not show clear associations between pollutants and severity, except for SO2 and hospitalization, with OR of 1.55 (95% CI 1.01-2.36) and 2.71 (95% CI 1.13-6.49) for concentrations of 15 and 24μg/m3, respectively, in relation to a reference concentration of 5μg/m3 (AU)

Papel del Doppler de la vena femoral en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda: resultados de un estudio multicéntrico prospectivo / Role of the femoral vein doppler in acute heart failure patients: results from a prospective multicentric study

Antecedentes y objetivo El objetivo de nuestro estudio es definir el papel de la ecografía Doppler pulsada (PW-Doppler) de la vena femoral común en la evaluación de la dilatación de la vena cava inferior (VCI), la probabilidad de hipertensión pulmonar, la insuficiencia tricuspídea y la excursión sistólica del plano anular tricuspídeo (TAPSE). Métodos Se trata de un estudio prospectivo en dos hospitales en 74 pacientes ingresados con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda. Se realizó ecografía PW-Doppler de vena femoral común, ecocardiografía y evaluación de la VCI en el momento del ingreso, así como PW-Doppler y ecografía de VCI al alta hospitalaria. Resultados La detección de un flujo pulsátil (138 exploraciones) tuvo una curva ROC excelente para la detección de VCI mayor de 2cm (AUC 0,931, Sn95%, Sp 90%, VPP 93%, VPN 94%) con una odds ratio (OR) de 211,2 (intervalo de confianza del 95% 48,13-926,72). La pulsatilidad del flujo también tuvo el mayor rendimiento en la detección de la hipertensión pulmonar (AUC 0,8, Sn 95%, Sp 64%, VPP 84%, VPN 84%) y en la detección de la insuficiencia tricuspídea moderada-grave (AUC 0,79, Sn 95%, Sp 67%, VPP 88%, VPN 78%). Si el flujo es continuo, podemos descartar razonablemente una disminución del TAPSE (VPN 89%). Conclusión La detección del flujo PW-Doppler de vena femoral común puede ser una ventana alternativa para la detección de una dilatación de la VCI de 2cm, TR significativa y la probabilidad de hipertensión pulmonar elevada en la insuficiencia cardiaca aguda. También permite descartar razonablemente la disfunción del ventrículo derecho en casos de normalidad en estos pacientes (AU)

Background and objective The aim of our study is to define the role of Pulsed-Doppler (PW-Doppler) Ultrasound of the common femoral vein in the assessment of dilatation Inferior Vena Cava (IVC), probability of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH), Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR), and Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). Methods This is a prospective two-hospital study in 74 patients admitted with acute heart failure (AHF). We performed PW-Doppler ultrasound of the common femoral vein, Point of Care cardiac ultrasonography and assessment of the IVC at the time of admission, as well as PW-Doppler and ultrasound of the IVC at hospital discharge. Results The detection of a pulsatile flow (138 scans) had an excellent ROC curve for the detection of IVC greater than 2cm (AUC 0.931, Sn 95%, Sp 90%, PPV 93%, NPV 94%) with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 211.2 (95% confidence interval 48.13-926.72). The pulsatility of the flow also had the highest performance in the detection of PH (AUC 0.8, Sn 95%, Sp 64%, PPV 84%, NPV 84%) and in the detection of moderate-severe TR (AUC 0.79, Sn 95%, Sp 67%, PPV 88%, NPV 78%). If the flow is continuous, we can reasonably rule out diminished TAPSE (NPV 89%). Conclussion Detection of PW-Doppler flow of the common femoral vein may be an alternative window for the detection of an IVC dilation of 2cm, significant TR, and the likelihood of high PH in acute heart failure. It also allows us to reasonably rule out dysfunction of the right ventricle in cases of normality in these patients (AU)

Safety and efficiency of discharge to home hospitalization directly after emergency department care of patients with acute heart failure. / Análisis de seguridad y eficiencia de la hospitalización a domicilio directamente desde urgencias en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether discharge to home hospitalization (HHosp) directly from emergency departments (EDs) after care for acute heart failure (AHF) is efficient and if there are short-term differences in outcomes between patients in HHosp vs those admitted to a conventional hospital ward (CHosp). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Secondary analysis of cases from the EAHFE registry (Epidemiology of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency Departments). The EAHFE is a multicenter, multipurpose, analytical, noninterventionist registry of consecutive AHF patients after treatment in EDs. Cases were included retrospectively and registered to facilitate prospective follow-up. Included were all patients diagnosed with AHF and discharged to HHosp from 2 EDs between March 2016 and February 2019 (3 years). Cases from 6 months were analyzed in 3 periods: March-April 2016 (corresponding to EAHFE-5), January-February 2018 (EAHFE-6), and January-February 2019 (EAHFE-7). The findings were adjusted for characteristics at baseline and during the AHF decompensation episode. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients were discharged to HHosp and 646 to CHosp. Patients in the HHosp group were older and had more comorbidities and worse baseline functional status. However, the decompensation episode was less severe, triggered more often by anemia and less often by a hypertensive crisis or acute coronary syndrome. The HHosp patients were in care longer (median [interquartile range], 9 [7-14] days vs 7 [5-11] days for CHosp patients, P .001), but there were no differences in mortality during hospital care (7.0% vs. 8.0%, P = .56), 30-day adverse events after discharge from the ED (30.9% vs. 32.9%, P = .31), or 1-year mortality (41.6% vs. 41.4%, P = .84). Risks associated with HHosp care did not differ from those of CHosp. The odds ratios (ORs) for HHosp care were as follows for mortality while in care, OR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.41-1.97); adverse events within 30 days of ED discharge, OR 0.88 (95% CI, 0.62-1.26); and 1-year mortality, OR 1.03 (95% CI, 0.76-1.39). Direct costs of HHosp and CHosp averaged €1309 and €5433, respectively. CONCLUSION: After ED treatment of AHF, discharge to HHosp requires longer care than CHosp, but short- and longterm outcomes are the same and at a lower cost.

OBJETIVO: Analizar si la hospitalización domiciliaria (HDom) directamente desde los servicios de urgencias (SU) de pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) resulta eficiente y si se asocia con diferencias en evolución a corto y largo plazo comparada con hospitalización convencional (HCon). METODO: Análisis secundario del registro Epidemiology Acute Heart Failure in Emergency departments (EAHFE), que es un registro multicéntrico, multiporpósito, analítico no intervencionista, con seguimiento prospectivo que incluye de forma consecutiva a los pacientes que acuden por episodio de ICA al SU. Se incluyeron, retrospectivamente, todos los pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en dos SU ingresados directamente en HDom entre marzo de 2016 y febrero de 2019 (3 años) y se compararon sus resultados con los pacientes diagnosticados de ICA incluidos en el registro EAHFE por esos 2 SU e ingresados en HCon durante los periodos marzo-abril 2016 (EAHFE-5), enero-febrero 2018 (EAHFE-6), y enero-febrero 2019 (EAHFE-7) (6 meses). Los resultados se ajustaron por las características basales y clínicas del episodio de descompensación. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 370 pacientes en HDom y 646 en HCon. El grupo HDom tenía mayor edad, mayor comorbilidad y peor situación funcional basal, pero menor gravedad del episodio de descompensación, más frecuentemente desencadenado por anemia y menos por crisis hipertensiva y síndrome coronario agudo. La duración del ingreso fue mayor [mediana (RIC) 9 (7-14) días frente a 7 (5-11) días, p 0,001], pero no hubo diferencias en mortalidad intrahospitalaria (7,0% frente a 8,0%, p = 0,56), eventos adversos a 30 días posalta (30,9% frente a 32,9%, p = 0,31) ni mortalidad al año (41,6% frente a 41,4%, p = 0,84). En el modelo ajustado, el riesgo asociado a HDom tampoco difirió significativamente en mortalidad intrahospitalaria (OR = 0,90, IC 95% = 0,41-1,97), eventos adversos posalta a 30m días (HR = 0,88, IC95% = 0,62-1,26) ni mortalidad al año (HR = 1,03, IC 95% = 0,76-1,39). El coste directo promedio del episodio en HDom y HCon fue 1.309 y 5.433 euros, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: En la ICA, la HDom directamente desde el SU es más prolongada que la HCon, pero consigue los mismos resultados a corto y largo plazo, y su coste es inferior.

Análisis de seguridad y eficiencia de la hospitalización a domicilio directamente desde urgencias en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda / Safety and efficiency of discharge to home hospitalization directly after emergency department care of patients with acute heart failure

Objetivos: Analizar si la hospitalización domiciliaria (HDom) directamente desde los servicios de urgencias (SU) de pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) resulta eficiente y si se asocia con diferencias en evolución a corto y largo plazo comparada con hospitalización convencional (HCon). Método: Análisis secundario del registro Epidemiology Acute Heart Failure in Emergency departments (EAHFE), que es un registro multicéntrico, multiporpósito, analítico no intervencionista, con seguimiento prospectivo que incluye de forma consecutiva a los pacientes que acuden por episodio de ICA al SU. Se incluyeron, retrospectivamente, todos los pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en dos SU ingresados directamente en HDom entre marzo de 2016 y febrero de 2019 (3 años) y se compararon sus resultados con los pacientes diagnosticados de ICA incluidos en el registro EAHFE por esos 2 SU e ingresados en HCon durante los periodos marzo-abril 2016 (EAHFE-5), enero-febrero 2018 (EAHFE-6), y enero-febrero 2019 (EAHFE-7) (6 meses). Los resultados se ajustaron por las características basales y clínicas del episodio de descompensación. Resultados: Se incluyeron 370 pacientes en HDom y 646 en HCon. El grupo HDom tenía mayor edad, mayor comorbilidad y peor situación funcional basal, pero menor gravedad del episodio de descompensación, más frecuentemente desencadenado por anemia y menos por crisis hipertensiva y síndrome coronario agudo. La duración del ingreso fue mayor [mediana (RIC) 9 (7-14) días frente a 7 (5-11) días, p < 0,001], pero no hubo diferencias en mortalidad intrahospitalaria (7,0% frente a 8,0%, p = 0,56), eventos adversos a 30 días posalta (30,9% frente a 32,9%, p = 0,31) ni mortalidad al año (41,6% frente a 41,4%, p = 0,84). (AU)

Objectives: To analyze whether discharge to home hospitalization (HHosp) directly from emergency departments (EDs) after care for acute heart failure (AHF) is efficient and if there are short-term differences in outcomes between patients in HHosp vs those admitted to a conventional hospital ward (CHosp). Methods: Secondary analysis of cases from the EAHFE registry (Epidemiology of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency Departments). The EAHFE is a multicenter, multipurpose, analytical, noninterventionist registry of consecutive AHF patients after treatment in EDs. Cases were included retrospectively and registered to facilitate prospective follow-up. Included were all patients diagnosed with AHF and discharged to HHosp from 2 EDs between March 2016 and February 2019 (3 years). Cases from 6 months were analyzed in 3 periods: March-April 2016 (corresponding to EAHFE-5), January-February 2018 (EAHFE-6), and January-February 2019 (EAHFE-7). The findings were adjusted for characteristics at baseline and during the AHF decompensation episode. Results: A total of 370 patients were discharged to HHosp and 646 to CHosp. Patients in the HHosp group were older and had more comorbidities and worse baseline functional status. However, the decompensation episode was less severe, triggered more often by anemia and less often by a hypertensive crisis or acute coronary syndrome. The HHosp patients were in care longer (median [interquartile range], 9 [7-14] days vs 7 [5-11] days for CHosp patients, P < .001), but there were no differences in mortality during hospital care (7.0% vs. 8.0%, P = .56), 30-day adverse events after discharge from the ED (30.9% vs. 32.9%, P = .31), or 1-year mortality (41.6% vs. 41.4%, P = .84). (AU)

Role of the femoral vein doppler in acute heart failure patients: results from a prospective multicentric study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to define the role of Pulsed-Doppler (PW-Doppler) Ultrasound of the Common Femoral Vein (CFV) in the assessment of dilatation Inferior Vena Cava (IVC), probability of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH), Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR), and Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). METHODS: This is a prospective two-hospital study in 74 patients admitted with acute heart failure (AHF). We performed PW-Doppler ultrasound of the common femoral vein, Point of Care (POC) cardiac ultrasonography and assessment of the IVC at the time of admission, as well as PW-Doppler and ultrasound of the IVC at hospital discharge. RESULTS: The detection of a pulsatile flow (138 scans) had an excellent ROC curve for the detection of IVC greater than 2cm (AUC 0.931, Sn 95%, Sp 90%, PPV 93%, NPV 94%) with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 211.2 (95% confidence interval 48.13-926.72). The pulsatility of the flow also had the highest performance in the detection of PH (AUC 0.8, Sn 95%, Sp 64%, PPV 84%, NPV 84%) and in the detection of moderate-severe TR (AUC 0.79, Sn 95%, Sp 67%, PPV 88%, NPV 78%). If the flow is continuous, we can reasonably rule out diminished TAPSE (NPV 89%). CONCLUSSION: Detection of PW-Doppler flow of the CFV may be an alternative window for the detection of an IVC dilation of 2cm, significant TR, and the likelihood of high PH in acute heart failure. It also allows us to reasonably rule out dysfunction of the right ventricle in cases of normality in these patients.

[Analysis of the relationship between ambient air pollution and the severity of heart failure decompensations in two Spanish metropolises (Barcelona and Madrid)]. / Análisis de la relación entre la contaminación del aire ambiente y la gravedad de las descompensaciones por insuficiencia cardiaca en dos metrópolis españolas (Barcelona y Madrid).

OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether the high levels of air pollutants are related to a greater severity of decompensated heart failure (HF). METHOD: Patients diagnosed with decompensated HF in the emergency department of 4 hospitals in Barcelona and 3 in Madrid were included. Clinical data (age, sex, comorbidities, baseline functional status), atmospheric (temperature, atmospheric pressure) and pollutant data (SO2, NO2, CO, O3, PM10, PM2.5) were collected in the city on the day of emergency care. The severity of decompensation was estimated using 7-day mortality (primary indicator) and the need for hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and prolonged hospitalization (secondary indicators). The association adjusted for clinical, atmospheric and city data between pollutant concentration and severity was investigated using linear regression (linearity assumption) and restricted cubic spline curves (no linearity assumption). RESULTS: A total of 5292 decompensations were included, with a median age of 83 years (IQR=76-88) and 56% women. The medians (IQR) of the daily pollutant averages were: SO2=2.5µg/m3 (1.4-7.0), NO2=43µg/m3 (34-57), CO=0.48mg/m3 (0.35-0.63), O3=35µg/m3 (25-48), PM10=22µg/m3 (15-31) and PM2.5=12µg/m3 (8-17). Mortality at 7 days was 3.9%, and hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and prolonged hospitalization were 78.9, 6.9, and 47.5%, respectively. SO2 was the only pollutant that showed a linear association with the severity of decompensation, since each unit of increase implied an OR for the need for hospitalization of 1.04 (95% CI 1.01-1.08). The restricted cubic spline curves study also did not show clear associations between pollutants and severity, except for SO2 and hospitalization, with OR of 1.55 (95% CI 1.01-2.36) and 2.71 (95% CI 1.13-6.49) for concentrations of 15 and 24µg/m3, respectively, in relation to a reference concentration of 5µg/m3. CONCLUSION: Exposure to ambient air pollutants, in a medium to low concentration range, is generally not related to the severity of HF decompensations, and only SO2 may be associated with an increased need for hospitalization.

Acute kidney injury patterns in acute heart failure: The prognostic value of worsening renal function and its timing.

INTRODUCTION: Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) admissions are frequently complicated by different patterns of serum creatinine (SCr) elevation. We aimed to assess the prognostic impact of worsening renal function (WRF) based on the timing of its occurrence. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of patients admitted for ADHF. Standard WRF was defined as an increase in SCr of ≥0.3 mg/dl during hospitalization. WRF timing was classified as early (within 48 hours of admission) or late (>48 hours). Acute kidney injury (AKI) at admission was defined as a rise in SCr of ≥0.3 mg/dl from outpatient baseline measurement to first measurement at admission. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for cardiovascular events at one-year follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 249 patients were included (mean age 77±11 years, 62% with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction). Early WRF occurred in 49 patients (19.7%) and was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome (HR 2.49; 95% CI 1.66-3.73), whereas late WRF was not (p=0.411). After stratification for the presence of early WRF and/or AKI at admission, only patients with early WRF but no AKI at admission and patients with both AKI at admission and early WRF showed a higher risk of the primary outcome after multivariate Cox regression. CONCLUSION: Early WRF was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome. The timing of WRF seems to be an important factor to take into account when considering the prognostic impact of creatinine variations during hospitalization for ADHF.