Involved-Field Radiation Therapy for Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas: Failure Pattern Analysis.

Introduction Unresectable pancreatic tumors are frequently diagnosed. Initial treatment is carried out with chemotherapy. Eventually, in selected cases, radiotherapy may be used to improve local control rates and relieve the symptoms. The volume of radiotherapy treatment fields is the subject of controversy in the literature. The use of involved fields with the gross tumor volume encompassing the primary tumor and lymph nodes considered clinically positive is associated with a lower rate of side effects, but can lead to a higher rate of regional loco failures, especially in regional lymph nodes. The purpose of this article is to analyze the failure pattern of chemotherapy and involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) for treating patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Methods Clinical records of thirty consecutive patients treated from March 2016 to June 2020 for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were analyzed. The patients were treated with initial systemic chemotherapy (median: 6 cycles) with regimens based on gemcitabine or oxaliplatin-irinotecan (folfirinox/folfox) followed by radiotherapy (total dose of 50-54 Gy/with fractionation of 2 Gy/day). The patients were treated with IFRT. Local failure (LF) was defined as an increase in radiographic abnormality within the planning target volume (PTV). Elective nodal failure (ENF) was defined as recurrence in any lymph node region outside the PTV. Any other failure was defined as distant failure (DF). Results The median age of the patients was 68 years (range: 44-80 years); 20 patients (66.7%) were men, and 11 (36.6%) and 19 (63.4%) patients presented with tumors of stage II and III, respectively. Most patients (63.3%) had tumors in the pancreatic head. The median survival was 17.2 months. Tumor recurrences were classified as LF, DF, LF and DF in 7 (23.3%), 17 (56.7%), and 5 (16.7%) patients, respectively. Only one patient (3.3%) had both LF and ENF. No severe side effects related to radiotherapy were reported. Conclusion The use of IFRT did not cause a significant amount of ENF, besides presenting low morbidity, which is of special importance for patients with locally advanced tumors or low performance status. The predominant failure pattern was distant metastases.

Involved-field irradiation or elective-nodal irradiation in neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally-advanced esophageal cancer: comprehensive analysis for dosimetry, treatment-related complications, impact on lymphocyte, patterns of failure and survival.

Purpose: To compare the differences between involved-field irradiation (IFI) and elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in selecting the optimal target area for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 267 patients with LA-ESCC, of whom 165 underwent ENI and 102 underwent IFI. Dosimetry, treatment-related complications, pathological responses, recurrence/metastasis patterns, and survival were compared between the two groups. Results: The median follow-up duration was 27.9 months. The R0 resection rates in the IFI and ENI groups were 95.1% and 92.7%, respectively (p=0.441), while the pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 42.2% and 34.5%, respectively (p=0.12). The ENI group received higher radiation doses to the heart (HV30:23.9% vs. 18%, p=0.033) and lungs (LV30:7.7% vs. 4.9%, p<0.001) than the IFI group. Consequently, the ENI group showed a higher incidence of grade 2 or higher radiation pneumonitis (30.3% vs. 17.6%, p=0.004) and pericardial effusion (26.7% vs. 11.8%, p=0.021) than the IFI group. Post-operation fistulas were observed in 3 (2.9%) and 17 cases (10.3%) in the IFI and ENI groups, respectively (p=0.026). In the multivariate analysis, smoking, positive lymph node involvement (pN+), and anastomotic fistula were independent predictors of overall survival (OS). The pN+ patients exhibited a greater propensity for recurrence compared to pN- patients, especially in the first year of follow-up (6.67% vs. 0.56%, p=0.003). Conclusion: The ENI group had a higher incidence of radiation-induced adverse events compared to the IFI group, likely due to the higher radiation doses to normal tissues. Considering the similar disease-free survival (DFS) and OS rates in the two groups, IFI may be suitable for nCRT in patients with LA-ESCC, although further prospective studies are warranted.

Elective nodal irradiation versus involved-field irradiation for stage II-IV cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective propensity study with 8-year survival outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) is suggested as the standard treatment for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC). This retrospective propensity study compared the 8-year survival outcomes and acute treatment toxicities of these patients treated with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) versus involved-field irradiation (IFI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stage II-IV CESCC treated with dCCRT at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2020 were enrolled in the study. All the patients were restaged according to the American Joint Commission 8th edition criteria. The propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize the effects of treatment selection bias and potential confounding factors including sex, age, ECOG score, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, clinical TNM stage and radiation dose between the ENI group and IFI group. Survival and the prognostic factors were evaluated. RESULTS: The 131 eligible patients underwent ENI (60 patients, 45.8%) or IFI (71 patients, 54.2%). The median follow-up time was 91.1 months (range, 23.8-182.0 months) for all the patients. The median OS, 1-, 3-, 5-, and 8-year OS rates were 44.4 months, 87.8%, 55.1%, 38.3%, and 27.2%, respectively. After PSM, there were 49 patients in each group. The median OS, 1-, 3-, 5-, and 8-year OS rates for ENI and IFI group were 32.0 months, 83.7%, 48.5%, 38.5% and 31.1% versus 45.2 months, 89.8%, 52.5%, 37.5%, 26.1%, respectively (P = 0.966; HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.61-1.61). Similar locoregional control was obtained in both groups. The tendency of leukocytopenia and neutropenia was higher in ENI than in IFI (59.2% vs. 38.8%; P = 0.068 and 30.6% vs. 14.3%; P = 0.089) at the end of dCCRT. CONCLUSION: Cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy has a satisfactory prognosis with organ conservation. The involved-field irradiation might be a better alternative owing to similar overall survival outcomes and local control with less toxicity of myelosuppression.

Involved-field irradiation and elective nodal irradiation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective:To analyze whether involved-field irradiation (IFI) was associated with improved survival and reduced treatment-related adverse events compared with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in Chinese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving radiotherapy.Methods:Literature review was conducted from CNKI, Wanfang Data, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central databases (until July 31, 2022). Relevant data were collected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) rate and treatment-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) rate and local control rate (LCR). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The quality of the results was assessed by using the meta analysis of Evidence Evaluation and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methods.Results:A total of 7 articles with 918 patients were included of which 465 received IFI and 453 received ENI. The 1-, 2-, 3-and 5-year OS rates in the IFI group were not significantly different from those in the ENI group (1-year OS rate: RR=1.00, 95% CI=0.94-1.07, P=0.97, high certainty; 2-year OS rate: RR=1.01, 95% CI=0.90-1.13, P=0.90, high certainty; 3-year OS rate: RR=0.86, 95% CI=0.71-1.05, P=0.14, high certainty; 5-year OS rate: RR=0.76, 95% CI=0.42-1.37, P=0.36, low certainty). In the IFI group, patients with ≥grade 2 acute radiation esophagitis ( RR=0.71, 95% CI=0.58-0.87, P=0.001, high certainty), ≥grade 3 acute radiation esophagitis ( RR=0.39, 95% CI=0.24-0.64, P<0.001, high certainty) and ≥grade 2 acute radiation pneumonitis ( RR=0.72, 95% CI=0.52-0.99, P=0.04, high certainty) were significantly lower compared with those in the ENI group. However, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of ≥grade 3 late radiation esophagitis, ≥grade 3 acute radiation pneumonitis and ≥grade 3 late radiation pneumonitis between two groups. No significant differences were noted in the 1-, 2-, 3-PFS rates and LCR between two groups. Conclusions:For Chinese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, IFI and ENI yield similar efficacy in terms of OS, PFS and LCR. However, IFI has a lower incidence of ≥grade 2 acute radiation esophagitis, ≥grade 3 acute radiation esophagitis and ≥grade 2 acute radiation pneumonitis than ENI.

A comparative study of elective nodal irradiation and involved field irradiation in elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

Objective: This comparative study aimed to explore the feasibility of involved field irradiation (IFI) in the radiotherapy of elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer, compared with elective nodal irradiation (ENI). Methods: A total of 245 elderly patients (age ≥70 years) with advanced esophageal cancer, who received radiotherapy in our department from January 2014 to December 2020, were divided into the ENI group (n=111) and the IFI group (n=134). Clinical efficacy, toxicities, survival rates, treatment failures, and multifactorial survival analyses were conducted for both groups. Results: The ENI group and the IFI group showed no significant differences in terms of short-term efficacy (91.9% vs 91.0%, P=0.814), 1-year overall survival (OS) (81.1% vs 74.6%, P=0.228), 2-year OS (22.5% vs 25.4%, P= 0.603), 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) (56.8% vs 51.5%, P= 0.198), 2-year PFS (8.1% vs 9.0%, P=0.814), regional failures (38.7% vs 31.3%, P=0.226), and distant metastasis (21.6% vs 14.9%, P=0.174). The median overall survival (OS) was 19 months in the ENI group and 18 months in the IFI group (Log-rankχ 2 = 0.012, P=0.913). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13 months in the ENI group and 11 months in the IFI group (Log-rankχ 2 = 1.834, P=0.176). There were no significant statistical differences in both OS and PFS (P>0.05). The incidence of grade ≥3 radiation pneumonia and grade ≥3 radiation esophagitis in the IFI group was 8.2% and 11.2%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the ENI group (17.1%, P=0.034; 21.6%, P=0.026). Univariate analysis revealed that age, gender, T stage, N stage, and synchronous chemotherapy were factors affecting prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that age, gender, T stage, and synchronous chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors, with hazard ratios of 1.227, 1.466, 2.441, and 2.714, and P values of <0.001, 0.006, <0.001, and<0.001, respectively. Conclusion: IFI is a suitable choice for elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer, as it yields similar efficacy to ENI while reducing toxicities. Age, gender, T stage, and synchronous chemotherapy are independent prognostic factors for elderly patients with esophageal cancer.

The role of involved field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze whether involved field irradiation (IFI) is associated with improving survival outcomes and reducing adverse events compared with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in patients of esophageal cancer who underwent definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Summary background data: Radiotherapy plays an important role for not surgery patients. However, the role of radiation target size is still uncertain. Methods: We searched Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central for English and non-English publications comparing esophageal cancer patients who received radiotherapy with IFI with those with ENI. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and adverse events related to radiotherapy. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Standard for non-randomized studies. We evaluated the certainty of evidence by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Results: Totally, 23 studies with 4120 patients were included. IFI group demonstrated significant improvement in the OS rates at 5 years, but not at 1, 2, and 3 years, compared with the ENI group (pooled Risk Ratio [RR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.90; P = 0.0004; high certainty). In addition, IFI demonstrated a significant decrease in the incidence of grade ≥2 acute esophagitis (AE) (pooled RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.90; P = 0.0005; high certainty) and grade ≥3 AE (pooled RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.69; P < 0.00001; high certainty) compared with ENI, but not in the incidence of grades ≥3 acute pneumonia, late esophagitis, and late pneumonia. Conclusions: Compared to ENI, IFI demonstrated significant improvement in OS at 5 years. The addition of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to IFI increased the 5-year OS; however, similar results were not observed with the addition of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to IFI and ENI. Furthermore, IFI demonstrated a significant decrease in grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 AE, while IMRT demonstrated no difference in the incidence of grade ≥3 AE. IFI and ENI do not differ in the incidence of grades ≥3 acute pneumonia, late esophagitis, and late pneumonia.

Treatment outcomes of 156 patients with cervical esophageal cancers treated with definitive radiation therapy- A single-institution experience of a rare cancer.

Purpose: Esophageal cancer is the most prevalent malignant tumor. The incidence of cervical esophageal cancer is low and there are insufficient data on the efficacy of radical radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to clarify the efficacy with radical IFI radiotherapy, to analyze the pattern of initial lymph node metastasis and recurrence under the new lymph node zoning of esophageal cancer. Methods: We reviewed cervical esophageal cancer treated with radical radiotherapy. The inclusion criteria were diagnosis of esophageal cancer by pathology; receiving radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy; tumor location in accordance with definition of cervical esophageal cancer. Three dimensional radiotherapy was used. The target area was IFI. Results: 156 patients entered the final analysis. The proportion of no failure was 42.31%, local esophageal failure was 30.13%, in-field lymph node metastasis was 10.26%, out-field lymph node metastasis was 1.28% and distant organ metastasis was 23.72%, second primary tumor was 2.56%. The median OS and DFS was 49.0 months (35.27-62.73) and 31.0 months (14.47-47.53). The results of initial LN metastasis pattern analysis showed the supraclavicular and upper mediastinum were the main sites of cervical esophageal cancer metastasis. In patients with recurrent LN, the results showed that the cervical, supraclavicle, upper mediastinum and abdomen were the main sites of recurrence. Conclusion: Our study is a retrospective study of a large sample of radical radiotherapy for cervical esophageal cancer. Failure in irradiation field is the main failure pattern. Concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy under IFI radiation is a considerable treatment option for cervical esophageal cancer.

Paclitaxel and cisplatin combined with concurrent involved-field irradiation in definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II clinical trial.

PURPOSE: This trial aims to explore the efficacy and safety of involved-field irradiation (IFI) combined with paclitaxel plus cisplatin as concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), under the premise of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: Enrolled patients with locally advanced ESCC were treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. IFI was administered adopting IMRT and the total dose was 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions. On the first day of radiotherapy, the patients were treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin one cycle per month for 2 cycles followed by the same regimen in consolidation chemotherapy for two cycles. The primary endpoint of the study was the 2-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rate, and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and September 2020, 108 patients participated in the trial. 78.7% (85/108) of patients completed all 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 33.9 months (interquartile range, 29.2-41.1). The 2-year LRFS rate, as the primary endpoint, was 64.2%. In addition, the median PFS was 39.2 months, and 1-year and 3-year OS rates of 88.0% and 63.3%, respectively. Among the patients, out-of-field regional failure was seen in only 7 (6.5%) patients. Neutropenia grade 3 and 4 occurred in 21.3% and 37.0% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IFI using IMRT combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced ESCC yields encouraging local control and overall survival, but high hematological toxicity. Trial registration Clinical Trials ChiCTR1800017039.

Comparison of curative effect between elective nodal irradiation and involved field irradiation combined with nedaplatin for cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer / 肿瘤研究与临床

Objective:To compare the efficacy and prognosis of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) combined with nedaplatin chemotherapy and involved field irradiation (IFI) combined with nedaplatin chemotherapy in the radical radiotherapy treatment of patients with cervical or upper thoracic esophageal cancer.Methods:Seventy-eight patients with cervical or upper thoracic esophageal cancer in Hai'an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from February 2017 to February 2020 were selected and divided into ENI group and IFI group according to random number table method, with 39 cases in each group. The ENI group was treated with ENI combined with nedaplatin chemotherapy, while the IFI group was treated with IFI combined with nedaplatin chemotherapy. After 2 months of treatment, the therapeutic effect and the dose of lung irradiation were compared between the two groups, and the occurrence of adverse reactions and prognosis were compared.Results:The total effective rate and disease control rate were 69.23% (27/39) and 82.05% (32/39) in IFI group, and 64.10% (25/39) and 74.36% (29/39) in ENI group, there was no significant difference between the two groups ( χ2 = 0.23, P = 0.631; χ2 = 0.68, P = 0.411). The lung irradiation doses of V 5 Gy and V 20 Gy in IFI group were lower than those in ENI group (both P < 0.05). The incidence rates of bone marrow suppression and radiation lung injury in IFI group were lower than those in ENI group (all P < 0.05). By the end of follow-up, the survival rates of IFI group and ENI group were 76.92% (30/39) and 66.67% (26/39), respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups ( χ2 = 1.06, P = 0.300). Conclusions:ENI and IFI combined with nedaplatin chemotherapy in the radical radiotherapy treatment of cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer have similar efficacy and prognosis, but IFI can reduce the lung radiation dose and the incidence of adverse reactions.

Efficacy analysis of elective nodal irradiation and involved field irradiation combined with chemotherapy in treatment of esophageal cancer / 肿瘤研究与临床

Objective:To explore the efficacy of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved field irradiation (IFI) combined with chemotherapy in treatment of esophageal cancer.Methods:A total of 104 patients with esophageal cancer in Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University from May 2018 to May 2020 were selected as subjects for prospective study. All patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group by lottery method with 52 cases in each group. The target volume of observation group was delineated with IFI, and the control group was delineated with ENI. The curative effects, the levels of serum tumor markers [carbohydrate antigen 50 (CA50), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)] before and after treatment, the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate, the incidence of adverse reactions and the scores of various dimensions of health survey summary (SF-36) after treatment were compared between the two groups.Results:The total effective rate in the observation group was 90.38% (47/52), the total effective rate in the control group was 84.62% (44/52), and the difference was not statistically significant ( χ2 = 0.79, P =0.374). There was no statistical difference in CA50, CEA, SCC levels between the two groups before and after treatment (all P > 0.05). After treatment, the CA50, CEA and SCC levels in the two groups were lower than those before treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The 1-year OS rate of the observation group was 94.23%, the control group was 90.38%, and the difference in OS between the two groups was not statistically significant ( χ2 = 0.54, P = 0.462). The incidence of acute radiation esophagitis in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in SF-36 scale scores of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, mental health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and general health after treatment (all P > 0.05). Conclusions:Both ENI and IFI are effective treatments for patients with esophageal cancer. There is no significant difference in the quality of life of patients between the two delineation methods, but the incidence of acute radiation esophagitis is lower in patients with IFI regimen.

Preliminary analysis of the benefit groups of patients with locoregional recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received different patterns of irradiation / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective:To explore the benefit groups of patients with locoregional recurrence of esophageal thoracic squamous cell carcinoma who received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with different patterns of irradiation.Methods:Clinical data of 344 esophageal thoracic squamous cell carcinoma patients with postoperative recurrence who received intensity conformal radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2009 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The distribution of recurrence sites and prognostic factors were analyzed. A stratified analysis was carried out on the benefit groups of patients receiving the elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved field irradiation (IFI).Results:276 cases (80.2%) recurred at a single site and 68 cases (19.8%) recurred at more than two sites. The follow-up rate was 96.2%. The 1-, 3-and 5-year overall survival rates were 53.6%, 22.6% and 16.4%, respectively, with a median of 12.8 months (95% CI: 11.3-14.3 months). The 1-, 3-and 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 46.5%, 16.9% and 12.0%, respectively, with a median of 11.0 months (95% CI: 9.6-12.4 months). The 1-, 3-and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 39.8%, 11.3% and 6.7%, respectively, with a median of 7.9 months (95% CI: 5.8-10.0 months). Multivariate analysis showed that gender, the log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) and the number of chemotherapy cycles were the independent prognostic factors ( P=0.003, <0.001, <0.001). Subgroup univariate analysis demonstrated that patients with an esophageal lesion length<5.0 cm, N 0 stage, the number of surgically-dissected lymph nodes of ≤9, the number of postoperative positive lymph node metastasis site of 0, and LODDS≤0.030 obtained benefits from ENI ( P=0.032, 0.012, 0.001, 0.012 and 0.014). Patients with the number of surgically-dissected lymph nodes of ≥16 achieved benefits from IFI ( P=0.035). Conclusions:Radiotherapy is an effective treatment mode for patients with local recurrence after esophageal cancer surgery. For patients with preoperative esophagography showing shorter esophageal lesions, earlier postoperative pathological N stage, lower LODDS score, and fewer surgically-dissected lymph nodes probably obtain more benefits from ENI than IFI. However, patients with more surgically-dissected lymph nodes may obtain more benefit from IFI compared with ENI.

[Clinical outcomes of different irradiation ranges in definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy for esophageal cancer].

Objective: To explore the therapeutic efficacy and safety of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved field irradiation (IFI) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, screen the patients suitable to undergo ENI radiotherapy and provide evidences for individual treatment of esophageal cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 924 patients with esophageal cancer who received definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy in our hospital from January 2006 to December 2015. Among them, 272 patients received ENI and the other 652 patients received IFI. The clinicopathologic characteristics of 272 cases in ENI group and 652 cases in IFI group, who were recruited according to the balance of propensity score matching method, were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate 1-year, 3-years and 5-years local-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. The univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors were also determined by Cox proportional hazard model and Long-rank test. Results: The clinicopathologic characteristics of these two group were not significantly different (P>0.05). The median follow-up time was 85.9 months and the follow-up rate was 95.9%. The 1-year, 3-years, 5-years PFS rates of the ENI groups were 65.3%, 31.7%, 18.4%, respectively, higher than 54.0%, 20.9%, 12.7% of the IFI group (P=0.001). The 1-year, 3-years, 5-years OS rates of the ENI groups were 79.0%, 43.7%, 24.9%, respectively, higher than 75.0%, 31.8%, 17.2% of the IFI group (P=0.003). In multivariate analysis, the sex, tumor volume, N stage and radiation field were independent factors for PFS and OS (P<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with male, age≤66 year, cervical and upper-thoracic location, tumor length≤6 cm, T1-2 stage, N0-1 stage, Ⅰ-Ⅱ stage, tumor volume≤50 cm(3), dosage>60 Gy and≤2 cycles of chemotherapy in the ENI group had a better survival rate than those in the IFI group (P<0.05). The total failure rate, local-regional failure rate in ENI group were significantly lower than those of IFI group (P=0.001, P=0.004). The incidence of bone marrow depression≥ grade 2 and 3 in ENI group was higher than that of the IFI group (P<0.05). However, the incidences of radioactive esophagitis≥ grade 3, radioactive pneumonia and late adverse reactions were not significantly different between these two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with IFI, ENI can significantly improve the long-term survival for young, early TN stage and cervical/upper-thoracic esophageal cancer patients underwent chemotherapy.

Comparison between the effects of elective nodal irradiation and involved-field irradiation on long-term survival in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study in China.

BACKGROUND: This study's initial results revealed significant decreases in treatment-related esophagitis and pneumonitis cases in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with involved-field irradiation (IFI), compared to elective nodal irradiation (ENI). This report outlines the long-term trial results, specifically; overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and locoregional progression-free survival (LRFS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stage II-III thoracic ESCC patients were assigned randomly, in a 1:1 ratio, into either the ENI or IFI arm. Radiation therapy was delivered once a day in 1.8-2.0 Gy fractions to a total dose of 60.0-66.0 Gy to the gross tumor volume and 50.0-54.0 Gy to the clinical target volume. The primary endpoints were acute treatment-related esophagitis and pneumonitis. The results for the primary endpoints were previously published in 2018. In this article, we analyzed the secondary endpoints including PFS, LRFS, MFS, and OS. RESULTS: Between April 2012 and October 2016, 228 patients from nine participating centers in China were enrolled into this study and randomly assigned to two treatment groups. For ENI and IFI groups, respectively, the results showed similarity and were as follows: median PFS (20.3 months vs 21.4 months), OS (32.5 months vs 34.9 months), MFS (28.2 months vs 26.0 months), and LRFS (25.0 months vs 26.6 months). In particular, respective OS rates in the ENI and IFI groups were 84.6% and 82.5% after 1 year, 45.1% and 48.7% after 3 years, and 29.8% and 30.7% at 5 years. PFS rates after 1, 3, and 5 years were 58.9%, 34.2%, and 26.9%, respectively, in the ENI arm compared to 64.4%, 30.8%, and 27.7%, respectively, in the IFI arm. Multivariate analysis identified clinical stage and tumor responses as independent predictors of OS. Meanwhile, tumor location, cStage, and tumor response were identified as independent factors influencing PFS. CONCLUSION: IFI was associated with similar survival as ENI in patients with thoracic ESCC, suggesting that IFI is an acceptable treatment method for thoracic ESCC.

Comparison of involved field radiotherapy and elective nodal irradiation in combination with concurrent chemotherapy for T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal radiation field of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is unknown. This retrospective study compared efficacy and safety of two CRT modalities, involved field irradiation (IFI) and elective nodal irradiation (ENI), when treating patients with clinical stage I (T1bN0M0) ESCC. METHODS: Patients had received 60 Gy CRT concurrently with 5-FU and cisplatin between January 2000 and December 2012. The clinical target volume of IFI was limited to the primary tumor plus a 2-cm craniocaudal margin; that of ENI covered the primary tumor plus the field of regional lymph nodes. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-five patients were selected (IFI group, 78; ENI group, 117). The 5-year overall, cause-specific and progression-free survival rates were 90.5%, 91.6% and 77.6% in the IFI group, and 72.5%, 88.3%, 57.9% in the ENI group, respectively. Of recurrent patients (n = 16 in the IF and n = 33 in the ENI groups) after achieving complete remission, 12 (75%) in the IFI group received definitive salvage therapy, 11 (33%) patients did in the ENI group. More patients died of diseases other than esophageal cancer in the ENI group (n = 29, 25%) than in the IFI group (n = 3, 3.8%). Multivariate analysis identified ENI (HR 3.63 [1.78-7.38], p < 0.001), age ≥ 70 (HR 2.65 [1.53-4.58], p < 0.001) and PS = 1 (HR 2.36 [1.33-4.18], p = 0.003) as poor prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: IF irradiation would be better than ENI for the patients with stage I ESCC who received definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Prognosis of different irradiation methods in patients with T2-3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective@#To evaluate the effect of different irradiation methods on the long-term prognosis of patients with clinical T2-3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, aiming to select the optimal treatment for these patients.@*Methods@#A total of 268 eligible patients admitted to our hospital from January 2007 to December 2012 were enrolled in this study. All patients were divided into the involved-field irradiation (IFI) and elective node irradiation (ENI) groups. The composition ratio, prognostic factors and adverse events were analyzed between two groups.@*Results@#The median overall survival (OS) time was 35.5 months (95%CI : 30.12-40.88) and the median disease-free survival (DFS) time was 23.5 months (95%CI: 19.00-28.00). According to the multivariate analysis results, all patients were assigned into two groups at a ratio of 1 vs.1(n=86 in each group). Multivariate analysis after propensity score matching (PSM) demonstrated that irradiation method was the independent factor of OS (P=0.038), and T stage and radiotherapy were the independent factors affecting DFS (P=0.002, 0.032). The incidence of ≥grade Ⅱ adverse events did not significantly differ between two groups (P=0.819, 0.756). However, patients with combined chemotherapy experienced more adverse events.@*Conclusion@#ENI can prolong the OS and DFS of patients with clinical T2-3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and does not increase the incidence of severe adverse events.

Prognosis of different irradiation methods in patients with T2-3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective To evaluate the effect of different irradiation methods on the long-term prognosis of patients with clinical T2-3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,aiming to select the optimal treatment for these patients.Methods A total of 268 eligible patients admitted to our hospital from January 2007 to December 2012 were enrolled in this study.All patients were divided into the involved-field irradiation (IFI) and elective node irradiation (ENI) groups.The composition ratio,prognostic factors and adverse events were analyzed between two groups.Results The median overall survival (OS) time was 35.5 months (95％CI:30.12-40.88) and the median disease-free survival (DFS) time was 23.5 months (95％CI:19.00-28.00).According to the multivariate analysis results,all patients were assigned into two groups at a ratio of 1 vs.1(n=86 in each group).Multivariate analysis after propensity score matching (PSM) demonstrated that irradiation method was the independent factor of OS (P=0.038),and T stage and radiotherapy were the independent factors affecting DFS (P=0.002,0.032).The incidence of ≥ grade Ⅱ adverse events did not significantly differ between two groups (P=0.819,0.756).However,patients with combined chemotherapy experienced more adverse events.Conclusion ENI can prolong the OS and DFS of patients with clinical T2-3NoMo esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,and does not increase the incidence of severe adverse events.

Elective nodal irradiation versus involved-field irradiation in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery (nCRTS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and major meetings were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared at least two of the following treatment regimens: nCRTS, neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery (nCTS), and surgery (S) alone. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcomes of interest, reported as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to compare all regimens simultaneously. RESULTS: Twenty-nine RCTs with a total of 5212 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Both nCRTS adopting ENI (nCRTS-ENI) (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48-0.83) and nCRTS adopting IFI (nCRTS-IFI) (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.86) significantly improved OS compared to S alone. No significant differences in OS, locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, R0 resection and postoperative mortality were observed between nCRTS-ENI and nCRTS-IFI. In subgroup analyses, nCRTS-IFI showed a significant OS advantage over nCTS (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.63-0.96) and S alone (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38-0.68) for esophagus squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but nCRTS-ENI did not; nCRTS-ENI using three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D-RT) resulted in an improved OS compared to that with 2D-RT (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34-0.99). Based on treatment ranking in term of OS, nCRTS-IFI (0.90) and nCRTS-ENI (0.96) was ranked the most effective treatment for ESCC and esophagus adenocarcinoma (EAC), respectively. CONCLUSION: Either adopting ENI or IFI, nCRTS is likely to be the optimal treatment for resectable EC, and nCRTS-IFI and nCRTS-ENI seem to be more effective for patients with ESCC and EAC, respectively. Future head to head comparison trials are needed to confirm these findings.

What Is the Optimal Radiotherapy Target Size for Non-Operable Esophageal Cancer? A Meta-Analysis.

Definitive radiotherapy has an affirmative role in treating non-operable esophageal cancer; however, the controversy between elective lymph node irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI) still remains. To ascertain the benefits and disadvantages of the two radiation target volumes, we performed a meta-analysis with 7 related publications. According to our findings, patients treated with ENI and IFI had nearly identical 1, 2, and 3-year survival rates (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 1.004, p = 0.980, and pooled OR = 1.15, p = 0.594, and pooled OR = 0.918, p = 0.679, respectively). Likewise, no significant differences were detected in local recurrence rates (pooled OR = 1.04, p = 0.883), regional recurrence rates (pooled OR = 0.65, p = 0.555), and distant metastasis rates (pooled OR = 1.29, p = 0.309) between the two treatment groups. However, IFI could significantly decrease the incidences of acute radiation esophagitis (pooled OR = 2.30, p = 0.001) and late pneumonia (pooled OR = 2.52, p = 0.04) compared with ENI. This meta-analysis provides evidence that IFI is more feasible for non-operable esophageal cancer than ENI.

Involved-field irradiation for elderly bladder cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Considering that adjuvant radiation therapy is one of the most common treatment methods and the influence of the clinical target volume to treatment-related toxicity, this study aimed to observe the differences in treatment failures about involved-field irradiation (IFI) without lymph node areas versus elective nodal irradiation (ENI) with lymph node areas in elderly patients with bladder cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-two elderly bladder cancer patients were analyzed from January 2010 to December 2014 in one institution. The primary inclusion criteria were previous after transurethral resection of bladder tumor or partial cystectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy, and the radiation techniques included IFI or ENI. The study required that elderly patients did not received radiotherapy before treatment. We observed treatment-related toxicity and tumor failures, evaluated local progression-free survival, estimated the 3-year overall survival, and analyzed prognostic factors, after IFI and ENI in elderly bladder cancer patients. The outcomes were determined by chi square tests, Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multiple factors analysis. RESULTS: In the experimental group, 42 patients (45.65%) received IFI, and a matched group of 50 patients (54.35%) received ENI. With a median follow-up of 31.47 months (range 4.00-86.00 months), the Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test demonstrated a statistical difference between the IFI group and the ENI group in acute toxicity (45.23% vs 72.00%, P = 0.008). However, there were no statistical differences in the 3-year overall survival rate (45.20% vs 48.00%, P = 0.860) or the duration of local progression-free survival (24.98 vs 34.30, P =0.729). CONCLUSIONS: IFI is feasible in elderly bladder cancer patients, as shown by a decrease in acute toxicity and no increase in local failure. We need a large number of clinical trials and data to further confirm these results.

Clinical outcomes in different target volume for cervical and upper-thoracic esophageal cancer in definitive chemoradiotherapy / 中华放射医学与防护杂志

Objective To investigate the prognostic effects and failure patterns of different clinical target volumes of IMRT in definitive chemoradiotherapy for cervical and upper-thoracic esophageal cancer,in order to provide a reference for radiotherapy target area delineation.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 132 patients with cervical and upper-thoracic esophageal cancer who received definitive IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy in our hospital from 2010 to 2014.Seventy-one patients received elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and the other 61 patients received involvedfield irradiation (IFI).The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate local control (LC),progressionfree survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates.The significant difference was evaluated by the logrank test.The prognostic factors were determined by Cox univariate and multivariate analyses.Results The last follow-up time was December 2017,the median follow-up time was 59.5 (14.2-95.8) months.Follow-up rate was 99.2％.For the ENI and IFI groups,the 1-,3-,5-year LC were 77.5％,58.8％,48.8％ vs.64.3％,29.1％,26.2％ (x2=9.68,P=0.002),PFS were 68.6％,37.7％,25.9％ vs.47.5％,17.2％,3.6％ (x2=11.39,P=0.001),OS were 81.7％,53.9％,31.3％ vs.70.5％,31.9％,16.3％ (x2=7.70,P =0.006),respectively.In multivariate analysis,T stage,N stage,and RT field were independent factors for LC,PFS and OS(P＜0.05).The total failure rates,local-regional recurrent rate in ENI group were lower than those in IFI group (x2 =13.23,5.24,P＜0.05).No significant differences were found in acute radiation esophagitis,pneumonitis and myelosuppression (Grades ≥ 3) between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusions Compared with IFI,ENI can significantly reduce local-regional recurrence and distant metastasis and improve the long-term survival for cervical and upper-thoracic esophageal cancer patients who received definitive chemoradiotherapy.