Rate of graft retear is higher in over-the-top superior capsular reconstruction for massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with subscapularis tear.

PURPOSE: To compare side-to-side superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with over-the-top SCR in terms of functional outcomes, pain relief and allograft survival rates. METHODS: Patients who had undergone arthroscopic dermal allograft SCR for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and clinical follow-up for ≥2 years were recruited. All patients underwent postoperative assessment with routine radiographic analysis for acromiohumeral distances, ultrasound imaging 1 and 3 months after SCR and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at least 12 months after SCR. The outcome measures were visual analogue scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. RESULTS: SCR was performed in 56 patients including side-to-side SCR in 32 and over-the-top SCR in 24. Postoperative MRI showed that the grafts were intact in 46 patients (82.1%; 26 who underwent side-to-side SCR and 20 who underwent over-the-top SCR). The proportion of nonhealing grafts in the over-the-top group was significantly higher with concomitant subscapularis tears (60% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.02). VAS scores and functional outcomes improved postoperatively in both groups and postoperative VAS (1.4 vs. 1.7; n.s.), Constant (74.8 vs. 76.0; n.s.), mean ASES (87.4 vs. 89.1; n.s.) and mean SANE (81.7 vs. 84.3; n.s.) scores did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: For massive rotator cuff tears, over-the-top and side-to-side SCR achieve similar pain relief and functional improvement, and the rate of healing allografts is high. However, over-the-top SCR is not recommended for massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with repairable subscapularis tendon tears due to a higher nonhealing rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Hemiarthroplasty for irreparable distal radius fractures in the elderly: A comprehensive review.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients maintaining functional independence can now be candidates for primary wrist hemiarthroplasty to manage acute irreparable distal radius fractures (DRFs). However, further investigation with long-term follow-up is required to validate these initial findings. AIM: To review the literature on the outcomes of distal radius hemiarthroplasty with available implants to assess its viability as a treatment option. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted using electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, and Scopus. The search terms employed were "distal radius fracture" , "hemiarthroplasty" , "wrist arthroplasty" , and related terminology. The search was restricted to articles published in English from 1980 until June 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed cases or case series of DRF treated with hemiarthroplasty, providing clinical or radiographic outcomes, and published in peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: A total of 2508 articles from PubMed and 883 from Scopus were identified initially. Following screening and removal of duplicates, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. These articles, predominantly clinical retrospective studies, provided insights into hemiarthroplasty outcomes, including functional improvements and complications. Hemiarthroplasty was a treatment option for complex DRF, particularly those cases with severe comminution, intraarticular involvement, or severe osteoporosis. Functional outcomes demonstrated improvements in pain relief, wrist mobility, and grip strength, with variability across studies. Complications included implant loosening, infection, nerve injury, and stiffness, with varying incidence rates influenced by surgical techniques and implant choice. Long-term outcomes were inadequately documented, warranting further research. CONCLUSION: Hemiarthroplasty is a promising treatment for irreparable DRF in the elderly. Long-term outcomes and complications require further study.

Tuberoplasty reduces resistance force in dynamic shoulder abduction for irreparable rotator cuff tears: a cadaveric biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic tuberoplasty is an optional technique for managing irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, there is a lack of studies investigating the resistance force during shoulder abduction in cases of irreparable rotator cuff tears and tuberoplasty. HYPOTHESES: In shoulders with irreparable rotator cuff tears, impingement between the greater tuberosity (GT) and acromion increases the resistance force during dynamic shoulder abduction. Tuberoplasty is hypothesized to reduce this resistance force by mitigating impingement. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight cadaveric shoulders, with a mean age of 67.75 years (range, 63-72 years), were utilized. The testing sequence included intact rotator cuff condition, irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs), burnishing tuberoplasty, and prosthesis tuberoplasty. Burnishing tuberoplasty refers to the process wherein osteophytes on the GT are removed using a bur, and the GT is subsequently trimmed to create a rounded surface that maintains continuity with the humeral head. Deltoid forces and actuator distances were recorded. The relationship between deltoid forces and actuator distance was graphically represented in an ascending curve. Data were collected at five points within each motion cycle, corresponding to actuator distances of 20 mm, 30 mm, 40 mm, 50 mm, and 60 mm. RESULTS: In the intact rotator cuff condition, resistance forces at the five points were 34.25 ± 7.73 N, 53.75 ± 7.44 N, 82.50 ± 14.88 N, 136.25 ± 30.21 N, and 203.75 ± 30.68 N. In the IRCT testing cycle, resistance forces were 46.13 ± 7.72 N, 63.75 ± 10.61 N, 101.25 ± 9.91 N, 152.5 ± 21.21 N, and 231.25 ± 40.16 N. Burnishing tuberoplasty resulted in resistance forces of 32.25 ± 3.54 N, 51.25 ± 3.54 N, 75.00 ± 10.69 N, 115.00 ± 10.69 N, and 183.75 ± 25.04 N. Prosthesis tuberoplasty showed resistance forces of 29.88 ± 1.55 N, 49.88 ± 1.36 N, 73.75 ± 7.44 N, 112.50 ± 7.07 N, and 182.50 ± 19.09 N. Both forms of tuberoplasty significantly reduced resistance force compared to IRCTs. Prosthesis tuberoplasty further decreased resistance force due to a smooth surface, although the difference was not significant compared to burnishing tuberoplasty. CONCLUSION: Tuberoplasty effectively reduces resistance force during dynamic shoulder abduction in irreparable rotator cuff tears. Prosthesis tuberoplasty does not offer a significant advantage over burnishing tuberoplasty in reducing resistance force. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tuberoplasty has the potential to decrease impingement, subsequently reducing resistance force during dynamic shoulder abduction, which may be beneficial in addressing conditions like pseudoparalysis.

Pectoralis Major Transfer For Anterior Recurrent Dislocation of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

Introduction: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for a spectrum of shoulder pathologies, extending its indications from rotator cuff arthropathy to encompass irreparable rotator cuff lesions, fractures, inflammatory arthritis, and tumors. However, the exponential increase in RTSA usage has brought a proportional rise in associated complications, with dislocation being one of the most common early post-operative complications. Case Report: This case report details a 65-year-old right-hand dominant male patient presenting with chronic pain and weakness in the right shoulder, diagnosed with advanced glenohumeral arthritis and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. The patient underwent a Bony Increased- Offset RTSA (BIO-RTSA) procedure, coupled with subscapularis repair. Postoperatively, the patient experienced pain and instability, culminating in an atraumatic anterior dislocation at 4 months. Despite conservative management, recurrent dislocations persisted. Revision surgery was performed with an increase in the linear component size for containment. About 1 year postoperative of the revision surgery, recurrent dislocation reoccurred. Re-revision surgery was performed with secondary pectoralis major (PM) transfer for subscapularis deficiency due to re-tear from recurrent dislocation, and with an increased humeral tray size for better containment. About 1-year and 6-month post-operative to the re-revision surgery, the patient achieved restored stability, improved range of motion, and reported satisfaction with the outcome. Conclusion: This case report underscores the challenges of managing recurrent anterior dislocation after RTSA. The successful use of secondary PM transfer highlights its efficacy as a salvage procedure in restoring stability for persistent anterior dislocation after RTSA. Yet, further clinical studies are warranted to establish the role of such interventions in the management for RTSA-associated complications. Level of Evidence IV: Case report.

Double tendon transfer for massive rotator cuff tear: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Repairing massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) can often be technically challenging due to tendon retraction, bursal fibrosis, and muscular fatty infiltration that usually occurs, often resulting in poor outcomes and an unpredictable prognosis. Although some other surgical management options have been reported, there is a lack of literature supporting tendon transfers in the presence of combined anterior and posterior-superior irreparable rotator cuff tears. We describe a case where a combined transfer of the latissimus dorsi and lower trapezius tendons was employed to treat an MRCT affecting the anterior and posterior superior portions of the rotator cuff. CASE PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old male presented significant pain and limited range of motion in the right shoulder following a traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation seven months prior. MRI showed retracted tears (> 5 cm) of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis tendons with significant fatty infiltration (Goutallier IV). The patient underwent an open transfer of the lower trapezius tendon to the greater tuberosity and the latissimus dorsi to the lesser tuberosity. At the final follow-up, 2.5 years postoperatively, the patient exhibited a painless functional range of motion and could resume daily activities. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Although there are alternative surgical options available, the positive outcomes observed in the presented case may be attributed to the restoration of rotational strength and the re-establishment of force coupling across the shoulder. CONCLUSION: This report describes the successful implementation of a surgical treatment option for managing MRCT affecting the anterior and posterior superior portions of the rotator cuff.

Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction in patients aged over 70 with irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Background: Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) was developed to restore superior shoulder stability, muscle balance, and function after irreparable posterior-superior rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether favorable clinical outcomes after SCR for irreparable rotator cuff tears would be obtained in patients aged more than 70 years. Methods: A total of 173 consecutive shoulders in 162 patients who underwent arthroscopic SCR using autografts of fascia lata for irreparable rotator cuff tears were allocated to 3 groups according to patient age at the time of surgery: Group 1, <55 years old (11 shoulders); Group 2, 55-70 years old (85 shoulders); and Group 3, > 70 years old (77 shoulders). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, active shoulder range of motion, and visual analog scale were evaluated before surgery and at the final follow-up. Postoperative complications, including graft tears in magnetic resonance imaging and donor-site morbidity, were assessed. Results: The mean follow-up was 3 years and 9 months. Both American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores and active range of motion (elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation) increased significantly after arthroscopic SCR in all 3 groups (P < .001), and visual analog scale decreased significantly. All 3 groups had low graft tear (6%-10%) and donor site morbidity (0%-1%) rates, with no significant difference among the groups. Conclusion: Arthroscopic SCR can lead to functional improvement and pain relief with a low rate of complications regardless of patient age.

Factors associated with reparability of rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To identify and quantify the factors associated with the reparability of rotator cuff tears (RCTs). METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for clinical studies published in English focusing on RCT reparability by using the keywords "rotator cuff tear" and "reparability". A meta-analysis was conducted if ≥3 studies examined the same factor and provided enough data to assess RCT reparability. Quality assessment was completed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies tool. RESULTS: Eighteen studies (2700 patients) were enrolled and 26 factors were included in the meta-analysis. The dichotomous variables associated with irreparability were Patte stage 3 (odds ratio (OR): 8.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.3-14.9), massive tear vs. large tear (OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.3-7.2), Goutallier stage for each tendon, and tangent sign (OR: 11.1, 95% CI: 4.3-28.4). The continuous variables associated with irreparability were age (mean difference (MD): 3.25, 95% CI: 1.4-5.1), mediolateral tear size (MD: 12.3, 95% CI: 5.8-18.9), anteroposterior tear size (MD: 10.4, 95% CI: 5.2-15.6), acromiohumeral distance on X-ray (MD: -2.3, 95% CI: -3.0 to -1.6) and magnetic resonance imaging (MD: -1.8, 95% CI: -2.8 to -0.9), and inferior glenohumeral distance on magnetic resonance imaging (MD: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4-3.0). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that older age, larger tear size, severe fatty infiltration, muscle atrophy, and advanced superior migration of the humeral head were strongly associated with irreparable RCTs. Conversely, clinical symptoms provided limited information for predicting reparability. Additionally, the tangent sign emerged as a powerful and simple tool for individual prediction, and several quantitative scoring systems also proved useful.

Labral repair, reconstruction, and augmentation improve postoperative outcomes in patients with irreparable or hypoplastic labra: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To review the postoperative outcomes of arthroscopic surgical options in treating irreparable and hypoplastic labrum of the hip. METHODS: Three online databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE) were searched from database inception to June 27, 2023 to identify literature on treatment strategies for hypoplastic/irreparable acetabular labrum. Data pertaining to classification of irreparable tears or labral hypoplasia, indication for surgery, description of treatment, radiographic findings, and clinical outcomes were recorded and described. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed by the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. RESULTS: Seven level IV case series, eleven level III retrospective cohort studies, and two level II prospective cohort studies comprising 1937 patients were included for analysis. Studies were divided into an irreparable labral group comprising 1002 patients and a hypoplastic labral group comprising 935 patients. Treatments included repair, augmentation, or reconstruction. In the irreparable group, 12 studies recorded improvement of modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) with preoperative scores ranging from 50.3 to 67.3 and postoperative scores ranging from 76.2 to 95.0. The rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and rate of revision arthroscopy were 6.6% and 5.9%, respectively across all studies. In the hypoplastic group, two studies that focused on repair noted no statistical difference in mHHS for repair in hypoplastic labrum vs repair in non-hypoplastic labrum. One study showed that there was a difference in post-operative mHHS for labral repair for hypoplastic vs non-hypoplastic labrum, with repair in non-hypoplastic labrum showing superior mHHS (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings of this review suggest that treatment of irreparable labra with reconstruction or augmentation results in improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). For the hypoplastic labrum, primary repair also results in improvement in PROMs. Future studies focusing on the hypoplastic labra alone with an appropriate control group, rather than irreparable labral tears, are needed to properly assess patient outcomes and guide surgical indications.

Novel figure-of-eight reconstruction with free tendon graft for unrepairable collateral ligament of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to report surgical technique and clinical outcomes for a novel figure-of-eight collateral ligament reconstruction technique using palmaris longus autograft for chronic irreparable collateral ligament injury of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Jobe elbow collateral ligament reconstruction method was adapted for thumb metacarpophalangeal joint collateral ligament reconstruction. Sixteen reconstructions (7 ulnar collateral ligament, 9 radial collateral ligament) using palmaris longus autograft were reviewed retrospectively. Surgery was performed at a mean 12 months post-injury. All 16 patients were followed up for more than 1 year. Metacarpophalangeal joint radial and ulnar deviation, metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joint range of motion, key pinch and grip strength, Glickel functional grade and QuickDASH score were evaluated. RESULTS: Preoperative radial or ulnar deviation improved from 19.3° to 5.3° postoperatively. Metacarpophalangeal range of motion improved from 31.5° to 46.6°, and interphalangeal range of motion from 48.4° to 65.6°. Preoperative key pinch and grip strength were respectively 49% and 81% of contralateral values and improved to 82% and 87%. On Glickel grade, 9 cases were excellent and 7 good. CONCLUSION: The novel Jobe-like figure-of-eight reconstruction technique using palmaris longus graft was useful for reconstructing irreparable thumb metacarpophalangeal joint instability without an incision on the opposite side or an additional implant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Combined Lower Trapezius and Middle Trapezius Tendon Transfer for Posterior Superior Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Case Report.

Introduction: Irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) often deteriorate shoulder function, necessitating careful consideration of treatment approaches. While reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is the first line of treatment in patients with arthropathy, preserving the joint is crucial for highly demand patients without arthritis. For those patients, various tendon transfer techniques have been established to address different types of IRCTs, including lower trapezius tendon (LTT) transfer for posterior superior IRCTs (PSIRCTs) and middle trapezius tendon (MTT) transfer for isolated supraspinatus IRCTs (ISIRCTs). Case Report: A 66-year-old male with persistent right shoulder pain and weakness for 2 years, diagnosed with PSIRCTs, sought an alternative to RTSA due to occupational concerns as a restaurant owner. Preoperatively, patients showed limited range of motion (ROM) and weakness, especially in forward elevation (FE) and external rotation (ER). Radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan indicated superior humeral head translation without advanced arthritis and concurrent tears in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus with atrophy. After the consultation, patients underwent a combined transfer of LTT and MTT with a split Achilles tendon allograft in Y-configuration. By postoperative 1 year, the patient exhibited notable improvement, including reduced pain (VAS 4-2), enhanced function (ASES 50-83, Constant 42-78), and increased ROM (FE, 120°-160° and ER, 10°-40°). Radiographic assessments demonstrated an increased in acromiohumeral distance without arthritic progression. Post-operative MRI confirmed tendon integrity, and the patient successfully resumed work at 6 months. Conclusion: A combined transfer of the MTT and LTT with a split Achilles tendon allograft in Y-configuration has been shown to alleviate pain, enhance functional scores, and improve the ROM in patients with PSIRCTs without arthritis.

Investigation of the pressure value while performing biceps tenodesis for superior capsuler reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: To compare the histopathological results of biceps tenodesis (BT) performed with normal, low, and high pressures for superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in rabbits with massive rotator cuff tears. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty rabbits were divided into three groups. Rabbits 1-10 underwent SCR with BT at the same pressure (Group 1), value measured in the groove; 50% lower (Group 2); 50% higher (Group 3). After the 4-week follow-up, shoulder were en-bloc excised and histopathological evaluation was performed with modified Bonar's scale. Results were compared between the groups, statistically. RESULTS: Extracellular matrix were significantly lower in group 2 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Cellularity levels were significantly lower in group 2 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Group 2 had no difference between the sides (p > 0.05). Group 2 had lower vascularity levels compared to the other groups (p = 0.01). DICSUSSION: When the biceps tendon was in the bicipital groove and in a more mobile state with lower pressure exposure. BT performed with a tension that creates less pressure than the biceps in the groove is more successful in SCR.

Biomechanical Comparison Between Superior Capsular Reconstruction and Lower Trapezius Tendon Transfer in Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.

BACKGROUND: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and lower trapezius tendon transfer (LTT) have recently been used to manage irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (PSRCTs). There has been a paucity of comparative biomechanical considerations between the 2 procedures. PURPOSE: To compare the glenohumeral stability and biomechanical properties between SCR and LTT in PSRCTs involving the entire infraspinatus tendon region. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested at 0°, 20°, and 40° of shoulder abduction. Maximum internal, external, and total humeral range of motion (ROM), superior translation of the humeral head, and subacromial contact characteristics were compared among 4 conditions: (1) intact rotator cuff, (2) PSRCTs involving the entire infraspinatus tendon region, (3) LTT using Achilles allograft (12 N and 24 N of loading), and (4) SCR using fascia lata allograft. RESULTS: Although a decrease in total ROM was noted in LTT with 12 N compared with the tear condition, LTT with both 12 N and 24 N as well as SCR did not restrict total rotational ROM compared with the intact condition. LTT had decreased total ROM compared with tear condition at 20° of abduction (P = .042), while no significant decrease was confirmed at all abduction angles after SCR. SCR and LTT with 24 N decreased superior translation compared with the PSRCT condition at 0° and 20° of abduction (P < .037) but not significantly at 40° of abduction, whereas LTT with a 24-N load decreased glenohumeral superior translation at all abduction angles (P < .039). Both SCR and LTT decreased subacromial contact pressure compared with the tear condition (P < .014) at all abduction angles. SCR decreased subacromial contact pressure at 0° and 40° of abduction (P = .019 and P = .048, respectively) compared with LTT with 12 N of loading, while there was no difference between SCR and LTT with 24 N of loading in all abduction angles. SCR increased the contact area compared with the PSRCT condition at all abduction angles (P < .023), whereas LTT did not increase the contact area. CONCLUSION: SCR and LTT decreased glenohumeral superior translation and contact pressure compared with PSRCT conditions. The LTT was superior to SCR in terms of superior translation of the humeral head at a higher shoulder abduction angle, whereas the SCR showed more advantageous subacromial contact characteristics compared with LTT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These biomechanical findings provide insights into these 2 fundamentally different procedures for the treatment of young and active patients with PSRCTs involving the entire infraspinatus tendon region.

Up to date diagnosis and treatment of massive irreparable cuff tears: Results of the survey of the U45 ESSKA Committee.

PURPOSE: Irreparable rotator cuff tears are disabling and can severely affect daily life activities, especially when young and active patients are involved. The definition is still debated, and they can have several clinical presentations. The treatment depends on the clinical presentation and the patient's age. METHODS: The survey was developed by the ESSKA U45 Committee and was uploaded on the ESSKA website. Fifty-seven questionnaires were returned. Several aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of massive irreparable cuff tears were investigated. Moreover, treatment options for specific clinical scenarios were given for posterior-superior and anterior-superior cuff tears in young and old patients. RESULTS: Fatty degeneration of the muscles was the most common criterion to define an irreparable tear (59.7%). In young patients with external rotation with the arm at side lag, partial repair of the cuff was the most common option (41.8%); in case of external rotation with the arm at side + external rotation at 90° of abduction lag without pseudoparalysis, the most common option was partial repair of the cuff + latissimus dorsi or lower trapezius transfer (39.3%), and in case of external rotation with the arm at side + external rotation at 90° of abduction lag with pseudoparalysis, partial repair of the cuff + latissimus dorsi or lower trapezius transfer was still the most common option (25.5%). The same scenarios in old patients yielded the following results: reverse prosthesis (49.1%), reverse prosthesis (44.6%) and reverse prosthesis ± latissimus dorsi or lower trapezius transfer (44.6%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present survey clearly confirms that biological options (partial cuff repairs and tendon transfers) are the reference in the case of young patients with deficient cuffs (both posterior and anterior). Reverse shoulder prosthesis is the most common treatment option in old patients in all clinical scenarios. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Autograft Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients 65 Years and Older With Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have both shown favorable outcomes in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs). Purpose: To (1) compare the clinical outcomes of ASCR versus RSA in patients aged ≥65 years with IRCTs and (2) compare serial changes in clinical outcomes between treatment groups. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included patients with IRCTs without glenohumeral osteoarthritis who underwent either ASCR or RSA between March 2013 and December 2020 and had at least 2 years of follow-up data. We assessed active range of motion, a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score at the preoperative, short-term (postoperative 6-12 months), and final follow-up times. Results: In total, 64 patients (ASCR, 31 patients; RSA, 33 patients) were included. The mean age of patients was 71.3 ± 4.4 and 72.9 ± 4.1 years, and the mean final follow-up duration was 42 ± 21.8 and 37.7 ± 21.7 months in the ASCR and RSA groups, respectively. At the short-term follow-up, RSA achieved significant improvements in all clinical outcomes, except for internal rotation (IR), while ASCR only showed significant improvements in VAS pain, ASES, and SANE scores. Compared with the preoperative period, both ASCR and RSA achieved significant improvements in all clinical outcomes, except for IR in the RSA group at the final follow-up. The ASCR group achieved better IR and ASES scores at the final follow-up, while the time taken to recover from pseudoparalysis was shorter after RSA. The ASCR group showed a 67.8% graft healing rate at the 1-year follow-up, while the RSA group showed 12.1% of scapular notching at the final follow-up. No other postoperative complications were observed in either group. Conclusion: ASCR and RSA achieved favorable clinical outcomes in the study cohort. At the short-term follow-up, RSA showed significant improvements in all clinical outcomes, except for IR, while ASCR only showed significant improvements in VAS pain, ASES, and SANE scores. At the final follow-up, however, ASCR had better IR and ASES scores compared with RSA.

Clinical results of arthroscopically-assisted lower trapezius transfer using fascia lata autograft for posterior superior irreparable rotator cuff tear.

Background: Different interpositional grafts have been proposed to connect between the lower trapezius tendon (LTT) to the humerus during LTT transfer. While studies often mention the successful use of Achilles tendon allograft, there is currently no literature reporting the clinical outcomes of utilizing fascia lata autograft (FLA) in LTT transfer. Therefore, the current study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results of LTT using FLA for posterior superior irreparable rotator cuff tears (PSIRCTs) without arthritis. Patient and methods: The present study constitutes a retrospective case series involving 22 patients, with a mean follow-up of 35.9 ± 15.9 months. Pain levels were gauged using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while shoulder function was comprehensively assessed through the Constant and ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Society) scores. The evaluation of shoulder activities in daily living employed the ADLER (Activities of Daily Living Requiring Active External Rotation) score. Active ROM (Range of Motion) of all directions were obtained, radiologic assessments included key parameters such as AHD (Acromion Humeral Distance) and the Hamada grade. Finally, the integrity of the transferred LTT was evaluated, and a subgroup analysis was undertaken based on Tm trophicity. Results: By the final follow-up period, VAS, Constant, ASES, and ALDER demonstrated significant improvement. Active ROM significantly improved in (FE) forward elevation to 155° ± 29°, abduction (Abd) to 140° ± 32°, external rotation (ER) at 90° Abd to 68° ± 19°, and ER at the side to 39° ± 17°. AHD and Hamada grade showed no significant arthritic progression. Tm hypertrophy group experienced superior improvements in ER compared to that of the non-hypertrophy group. Complications included re-tear (n = 2), infection (n = 1) and donor-site morbidity (n = 1). Conclusion: The study highlighted promising clinical outcomes of LTT transfer using FLA, with no significant complications. Along with Achilles tendon allograft, FLA can be a safe and viable alternative interpositional graft choice.

Margin convergence vs. superior capsular reconstruction for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: outcomes are equivalent unless there is preoperative pseudoparesis.

BACKGROUND: Margin convergence (MC) and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) are common treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff tears in younger patients, although they differ in associated costs and operative times. The purpose of this study was to compare range of motion, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and reoperation rates following MC and SCR. We hypothesized superior outcomes after SCR relative to MC regarding functional outcomes, subjective measures, and reoperation rates. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective review of 59 patients from 3 surgeons treating irreparable rotator cuff tears with either MC (n = 28) or SCR (n = 31) and minimum 1-year follow-up from 2014-2019. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), active forward flexion (FF), external rotation (ER), retear rate, and conversion rate to reverse shoulder arthroplasty were evaluated. t tests and χ2 tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively (P < .05). RESULTS: Baseline demographics, range of motion, and magnetic resonance imaging findings were similar between groups. Average follow-up was 31.5 months and 17.8 months for the MC and SCR groups, respectively (P < .001). The MC and SCR groups had similar postoperative FF (151° ± 26° vs. 142° ± 38°; P = .325) and ER (48° ± 12° vs. 46° ± 11°; P = .284), with both groups not improving significantly from their preoperative baselines. However, both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in VAS score (MC: 7.3 to 2.5; SCR: 6.4 to 1.0) and SSV (MC: 54% to 82%; SCR: 38% to 87%). There were no significant differences in postoperative VAS scores, SSV, and rates of retear or rates of conversion to arthroplasty between the MC and SCR groups. In patients with preoperative pseudoparesis (FF < 90°), SCR (n = 9) resulted in greater postoperative FF than MC (n = 5) (141° ± 38° vs. 67° ± 24°; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Both MC and SCR demonstrated excellent postoperative outcomes in the setting of massive irreparable rotator cuff tear, with significant improvements in PROs and no significant differences in range of motion. Specifically for patients with preoperative pseudoparesis, SCR was more effective in restoring forward elevation. Further long-term studies are needed to compare outcomes and establish appropriate indications.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral arthritis can improve clinical outcomes despite history of prior rotator cuff repair: A systematic review.

IMPORTANCE: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is often used to surgically address massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT) without arthritis. The impact of prior attempted rotator cuff repair (RCR) on outcomes is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare functional outcomes, range of motion, and complications in patients with a MIRCT without arthritis who underwent RSA as a primary procedure versus after prior RCR. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review was performed on RSA for a MIRCT. The search was conducted from February to March of 2022 using the MEDLINE database. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), range of motion (ROM), and complications were extracted. These outcomes were weighted and analysed based on whether the reverse was performed as the primary procedure or following a prior RCR. FINDINGS: Seven studies were included in the analysis, consisting of 343 cases in the primary RSA group and 95 cases in the prior RCR group, with a mean follow-up of 40.8 months. There were no demographic differences between cohorts. Postoperative PROs and ROM were comparable between groups, although the prior RCR group had a higher maximal percentage of improvement (MPI%) for the Constant-Murley Score and Simple Shoulder Test. There was a higher risk for complications (relative risk [RR] 6.26) and revisions (RR 3.91) in the prior RCR group. The most common complications were acromial stress fractures and prosthetic dislocation. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Patients undergoing RSA for MIRCT following a prior RCR have functional outcomes that are largely comparable to those who have a primary RSA, but they may be at higher risk of complications and revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Midterm outcomes of primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of studies with minimum 5-year follow-up.

Background: Excellent short-term outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been reported, but longer term outcomes in the existing literature are sparse and vary widely. The purpose of this study is to systematically assess the existing literature to quantify functional outcomes and complication rates after RSA at a minimum of five years of follow-up. Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses-compliant systematic literature search of the PubMed and Embase databases was undertaken. Studies reporting outcomes after primary RSA for nontrauma-related indications with a minimum of 5-year follow-up were included. Results: Overall, 20 studies satisfied all inclusion criteria. This represented 1591 shoulders in 1556 patients (32.1% males), with a mean age of 70.2 ± 5.0 years and mean follow-up of 8.8 years, or 106.2 ± 30.1 months (60-243). At final follow-up, the mean reported Constant Murley score was 62.1 ± 5.0 (49.0-83.0). The mean adjusted Constant Murley score was 83.5 ± 12.5 (58-111.9). The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 81.8 ± 4.6, while the mean subjective shoulder value was 74.6 ± 6.4. Overall, 88% of patients rated their satisfaction as either good or very good. The range of active forward flexion, abduction, external, and internal rotation were respectively, 126° ± 13°, 106° ± 11°, 22° ± 11°, and 6° ± 2°. The overall rate of revision surgery was 4.9% (0%-45.5%). Regarding complications, the rate of prosthetic joint infection was 4.3% (0%-26.7%), shoulder dislocation was 3.7% (0%-20.4%), and acromial fracture was 2.0% (0%-8.8%). At final follow-up, 30.9% of shoulders had some degree of scapular notching. Conclusion: This systematic review shows that RSA results in high satisfaction rates, good clinical outcomes, as well as modest complication and revision rates at minimum 5-year follow-up.

Surgical Management of Massive Irreparable Cuff Tears: Superior Capsule Reconstruction and Rotator Cable Reconstruction.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) present treatment challenges. Recently, superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) and anterior cable reconstruction have emerged as surgical options, but no single approach is superior. This review provides an overview of SCR and cable reconstruction techniques, including biomechanical studies, clinical outcomes, and surgical considerations. RECENT FINDINGS: Biomechanical studies show SCR with autografts or allografts improves glenohumeral stability and mechanics. Clinical outcomes of SCR demonstrate improved range of motion, function scores, and pain relief in short-term studies. Anterior cable reconstruction reduces superior humeral head translation and subacromial pressures in biomechanical models. Early clinical studies report improved rotator cuff healing and outcomes for cable reconstruction in specific irreparable tear patterns. SCR and cable reconstruction are viable surgical options for MIRCTs based on early encouraging results. However, higher-level comparative studies with long-term follow-up are still needed. Careful consideration of tear pattern, patient factors, and surgical goals is required to optimize treatment of MIRCTs. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal role for these procedures.