Versatility of Islanded Nasolabial Flap Based on Facial Artery and Vein for Reconstruction of Oral Cancer Defects, Experience in a Tertiary Care Center.

Introduction: Conventional nasolabial flap has been widely used for reconstruction for head and neck defects. Recent decades witnessed modification of this flap like islanded version based on subcutaneous pedicle or facial artery and vein. The later modification obviated a need for pedicle division, secondary procedures and facilitates reach of the flap to distant sites. Especially, the islanded nasolabial flap pedicled on facial artery and vein can have a long pedicle to conveniently reach the tongue, floor of mouth when the flap is routed through retromandibular area. Methods: A retrospective analysis was done on 14 patients analyzing the functional outcome like deglutition, speech, and aesthetic outcome of flap donor area, recruiting patients in which islanded nasolabial flap was done based on facial vessels for early stages of cancer tongue and lip. Results: In our series of 14 operated cases, all flaps survived. All the flaps were islanded over the skeletonized facial artery and vein. Tip necrosis occurred in one case. The donor site was closed primarily in all cases. The average speech scoring was grade five, Vancouver scar score of the flap donor area was 2.5 and intelligible speech was difficult in only three cases in follow up. Conclusion: We found this flap useful for reconstruction of small to moderate size defects of oral malignancy following excision with acceptable aesthetic and functional outcome in most of the patients.

Nasolabial pedicled compared with island flaps for intraoral reconstruction of oncological defects: complications, recovery of sensitivity, and assessment of quality of life.

Our aim was to compare pedicled and island nasolabial flaps used for reconstruction of oral defects in terms of postoperative complications, recovery of sensitivity, and quality of life. We organised a retrospective cohort study of 49 patients who had had intraoral reconstruction with nasolabial pedicled (n-=13) and island (n=36) flaps. Twenty- two patients filled in a validated quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaire and we did sensitivity tests (sharp discrimination with the aid of a Semmes-Weinstein™ aesthesiometer). Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed and probabilities of 0.05 were accepted as significant. There were 11 flap-related complications (22%), and the flap was totally necrotic in three patients (6%), all of whom had island flaps. There was a significant association between flap-related complications and the use of reconstruction plate p=0.001, 95% CI 2.36 to 11.37) and advanced stage (T3 and T4 p=0.01, 95% CI 1.45 to 5.26). Skin sensitivity recovered in both island and pedicled flaps. Patients treated with island flaps had significantly more problems with prosthetic rehabilitation than those treated with pedicled flaps. The relatively low morbidity and adequate functional and aesthetic results make the pedicled nasolabial flap a viable technique. De-epithelialisation of the pedicle in island flaps permits coverage of defects with unilateral flaps in a one-stage reconstruction. However, the pedicle may be excessively stretched, leading to ischaemic complications.