Quemadura genital por producto químico: reporte de caso / Genital burn by chemical product: case report

Resumen ANTECEDENTES: Las quemaduras son la forma más severa de estrés que el cuerpo puede sufrir; pueden generarse por diferentes agentes térmicos y químicos. CASO CLÍNICO: Paciente de 25 años, con dolor intenso en la región genital de 12 horas de evolución, secundario a la introducción en la vagina de una piedra de alumbre. Se le hicieron múltiples irrigaciones con solución salina al 0.9% sin obtener el resto de la piedra de alumbre. Se le aplicó sulfadiazina de plata en la cavidad vaginal cada 12 horas, óvulos vaginales de ketanserina, miconazol y metronidazol cada 8 horas, ketorolaco por vía oral 10 mg cada 8 horas. Durante su estancia hospitalaria tuvo buena evolución, con disminución de la inflamación en la zona genital, epitelización adecuada. Al tercer día se dio de alta del hospital con cita para valoración a los siete días. CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento de las quemaduras en el área genital, por agentes químicos, tiene como piedra angular la identificación del agente causante de la lesión que permita actuar de forma inmediata y evitar las secuelas físicas, sexuales y psicológicas mediante el lavado exhaustivo con solución o agua estéril para remover el agente causal y disminuir que continúe actuando en el sitio afectado.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Burns are the most severe form of stress that the body can suffer; they can be caused by various thermal and chemical agents. CLINICAL CASE: A 25-year-old female patient presented with severe genital pain of 12 hours' duration, secondary to the introduction of an alum stone into the vagina. She underwent several irrigations with 0.9% saline without obtaining the rest of the alum stone. She was given vaginal silver sulfadiazine every 12 hours, vaginal ketanserin, miconazole and metronidazole every 8 hours and oral ketorolac 10 mg every 8 hours. During her stay in hospital, she progressed well, with a decrease in genital inflammation and adequate epithelialisation. She was discharged on the third day with an appointment for a seven-day follow-up. CONCLUSION: The management of genital burns caused by chemical agents is based on the identification of the agent causing the lesion, which allows immediate action and prevents physical, sexual and psychological sequelae by thorough washing with sterile solution or water to remove the causative agent and reduce its continued action in the affected area.

Costo-efectividad de la ketanserina vs sulfadiazina de plata micronizada ehn el paciente con pie diabético / Cost-effectiveness of the ketanserin vs sulfadiazine on the patient with diabetic foot

Objetivo. Determinar el costo-efectividad de la ketanserina vs sulfadiazina en el paciente con pie diabético. Material y método. Estudio de costo efectividad en pacientes con pie diabético, se integraron dos grupos, los manejados con ketanserina (n=50) y los manejados con sulfadiazina (n=30), se incluyeron a todos los que acudieron al servicio. El costo contempló los insumos para la curación y el medicamento. La efectividad se midió con la reducción de la lesión medida en centímetros y el porcentaje de pacientes curados. Se realizó análisis incremental. Resultados. El costo del centímetro cuadrado de curación en ketanserina es de $22,43 US y en sulfadiazina $120,44 US. La proyección del costo a 5000 pacientes con una lesión de 10 centímetros es $1.121.651 US en ketanserina y $6.021.787 US en sulfadiazina de plata. Conclusión. En el manejo del pie diabético la relación costo-efectividad de la ketanserina es mejor que la sulfadiazina.

Objective. Determine the cost-efectiveness of the ketanserin vs. sulfadiazine on the patient with diabetic foot. Methodology. Study of the cost efectiveness on patients with diabetic foot, there were integrated two groups; the ones managed with ketanserin (n=50), and the ones managed with sulfadiazine (n=30), all that came to the service were included. Te cost contemplates the inputs for the cure and the medication. Te efectiveness was measured with the reduction of the injury measured in centimeters and the cured patient’s percent. Sensitivity and incremental analysis was performed. Results. Te cost of square centimeter of healing in ketanserin is $22.43 US and in the sulfadiazine $120.44 US. Te cost of 5000 patients whit an 10 centimeter injury is $1,121,651 US in ketanserin and $6,021,787 US in sulfadiazine. Conclusion. Te relation cost-efectiveness of the ketanserin is better than the sulfadiazine one in the management of the diabetic foot.

Uso tópico de ketanserina na cicatrização de feridas cutâneas induzidas em equinos / Topical use of kentaserin on healing of experimentally-induced skin wounds in horses

Estudou-se a eficácia do uso tópico de ketanserina como promotor da cicatrização de feridas cutâneas induzidas em equinos. As feridas foram produzidas em ambos os metâmeros na região da garupa de oito cavalos adultos, em formato quadrangular, medindo cinco centímetros de lado. Aleatoriamente um dos metâmeros foi escolhido como tratado, permanecendo o contralateral como controle. As lesões do grupocontrole foram lavadas somente com água e detergente neutro e no grupo tratado foi realizado o mesmo procedimento seguido de aplicação tópica de ketanserina. A evolução macroscópica e microscópica do processo cicatricial foi avaliada e a área de cada ferida determinada no decorrer do período experimental. Não foram verificadas diferenças significativas entre as feridas do grupo-controle e do grupo tratado com ketanserina durante 56 dias de avaliação.

The efficiency of topical use of kentaserin on healing evolution of induced skin wounds in horses was studied. The experimental surgical wounds were made in both sides of the croup of eight adult horses. The wounds were square-shaped measuring 5cm of each side. One side was considered control and the opposite one treated. Both control and treated animals were rinsed with water and neutral soap. Additionally, the wound on the treated horses received the topical treatment with ketanserin. Macroscopic and microscopic healing evolution of the wounds was evaluated and their areas were determined during the experimental period. The use of topical ketanserin showed no difference between the control and the treated wounds during a period of 56 days.