Creation of Standardized Common Data Elements for Diagnostic Tests in Infectious Disease Studies: Semantic and Syntactic Mapping.

BACKGROUND: It is necessary to harmonize and standardize data variables used in case report forms (CRFs) of clinical studies to facilitate the merging and sharing of the collected patient data across several clinical studies. This is particularly true for clinical studies that focus on infectious diseases. Public health may be highly dependent on the findings of such studies. Hence, there is an elevated urgency to generate meaningful, reliable insights, ideally based on a high sample number and quality data. The implementation of core data elements and the incorporation of interoperability standards can facilitate the creation of harmonized clinical data sets. OBJECTIVE: This study's objective was to compare, harmonize, and standardize variables focused on diagnostic tests used as part of CRFs in 6 international clinical studies of infectious diseases in order to, ultimately, then make available the panstudy common data elements (CDEs) for ongoing and future studies to foster interoperability and comparability of collected data across trials. METHODS: We reviewed and compared the metadata that comprised the CRFs used for data collection in and across all 6 infectious disease studies under consideration in order to identify CDEs. We examined the availability of international semantic standard codes within the Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms, the National Cancer Institute Thesaurus, and the Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes system for the unambiguous representation of diagnostic testing information that makes up the CDEs. We then proposed 2 data models that incorporate semantic and syntactic standards for the identified CDEs. RESULTS: Of 216 variables that were considered in the scope of the analysis, we identified 11 CDEs to describe diagnostic tests (in particular, serology and sequencing) for infectious diseases: viral lineage/clade; test date, type, performer, and manufacturer; target gene; quantitative and qualitative results; and specimen identifier, type, and collection date. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of CDEs for infectious diseases is the first step in facilitating the exchange and possible merging of a subset of data across clinical studies (and with that, large research projects) for possible shared analysis to increase the power of findings. The path to harmonization and standardization of clinical study data in the interest of interoperability can be paved in 2 ways. First, a map to standard terminologies ensures that each data element's (variable's) definition is unambiguous and that it has a single, unique interpretation across studies. Second, the exchange of these data is assisted by "wrapping" them in a standard exchange format, such as Fast Health care Interoperability Resources or the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium's Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization Model.

Functional Analysis of G6PD Variants Associated With Low G6PD Activity in the All of Us Research Program.

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) protects red blood cells against oxidative damage through regeneration of NADPH. Individuals with G6PD polymorphisms (variants) that produce an impaired G6PD enzyme are usually asymptomatic, but at risk of hemolytic anemia from oxidative stressors, including certain drugs and foods. Prevention of G6PD deficiency-related hemolytic anemia is achievable through G6PD genetic testing or whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to identify affected individuals who should avoid hemolytic triggers. However, accurately predicting the clinical consequence of G6PD variants is limited by over 800 G6PD variants which remain of uncertain significance. There also remains significant variability in which deficiency-causing variants are included in pharmacogenomic testing arrays across institutions: many panels only include c.202G>A, even though dozens of other variants can also cause G6PD deficiency. Here, we seek to improve G6PD genotype interpretation using data available in the All of Us Research Program and using a yeast functional assay. We confirm that G6PD coding variants are the main contributor to decreased G6PD activity, and that 13% of individuals in the All of Us data with deficiency-causing variants would be missed if only the c.202G>A variant were tested for. We expand clinical interpretation for G6PD variants of uncertain significance; reporting that c.595A>G, known as G6PD Dagua or G6PD Açores, and the newly identified variant c.430C>G, reduce activity sufficiently to lead to G6PD deficiency. We also provide evidence that five missense variants of uncertain significance are unlikely to lead to G6PD deficiency, since they were seen in hemi- or homozygous individuals without a reduction in G6PD activity. We also applied the new WHO guidelines and were able to classify two synonymous variants as WHO class C. We anticipate these results will improve the accuracy, and prompt increased use, of G6PD genetic tests through a more complete clinical interpretation of G6PD variants. As the All of Us data increases from 245,000 to 1 million participants, and additional functional assays are carried out, we expect this research to serve as a template to enable complete characterization of G6PD deficiency genotypes. With an increased number of interpreted variants, genetic testing of G6PD will be more informative for preemptively identifying individuals at risk for drug- or food-induced hemolytic anemia.

The Role of HL7 FHIR in the European Project GATEKEEPER.

The European Project GATEKEEPER aims to develop a platform and marketplace to ensure a healthier independent life for the aging population. In this platform the role of HL7 FHIR is to provide a shared logical data model to collect data in heterogeneous living, which can be used by AI Service and the Gatekeeper HL7 FHIR Implementation Guide was created for this purpose. Independent pilots used this IG and illustrate the impact of the approach, benefit, value, and scalability.

Pediatric and Young Adult Household Transmission of the Initial Waves of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States: Administrative Claims Study.

BACKGROUND: The correlates responsible for the temporal changes of intrahousehold SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the United States have been understudied mainly due to a lack of available surveillance data. Specifically, early analyses of SARS-CoV-2 household secondary attack rates (SARs) were small in sample size and conducted cross-sectionally at single time points. From these limited data, it has been difficult to assess the role that different risk factors have had on intrahousehold disease transmission in different stages of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in children and youth. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the transmission dynamic and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 among pediatric and young adult index cases (age 0 to 25 years) in the United States through the initial waves of the pandemic. METHODS: Using administrative claims, we analyzed 19 million SARS-CoV-2 test records between January 2020 and February 2021. We identified 36,241 households with pediatric index cases and calculated household SARs utilizing complete case information. Using a retrospective cohort design, we estimated the household SARS-CoV-2 transmission between 4 index age groups (0 to 4 years, 5 to 11 years, 12 to 17 years, and 18 to 25 years) while adjusting for sex, family size, quarter of first SARS-CoV-2 positive record, and residential regions of the index cases. RESULTS: After filtering all household records for greater than one member in a household and missing information, only 36,241 (0.85%) of 4,270,130 households with a pediatric case remained in the analysis. Index cases aged between 0 and 17 years were a minority of the total index cases (n=11,484, 11%). The overall SAR of SARS-CoV-2 was 23.04% (95% CI 21.88-24.19). As a comparison, the SAR for all ages (0 to 65+ years) was 32.4% (95% CI 32.1-32.8), higher than the SAR for the population between 0 and 25 years of age. The highest SAR of 38.3% was observed in April 2020 (95% CI 31.6-45), while the lowest SAR of 15.6% was observed in September 2020 (95% CI 13.9-17.3). It consistently decreased from 32% to 21.1% as the age of index groups increased. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, we found that the youngest pediatric age group (0 to 4 years) had 1.69 times (95% CI 1.42-2.00) the odds of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to any family members when compared with the oldest group (18 to 25 years). Family size was significantly associated with household viral transmission (odds ratio 2.66, 95% CI 2.58-2.74). CONCLUSIONS: Using retrospective claims data, the pediatric index transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during the initial waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States was associated with location and family characteristics. Pediatric SAR (0 to 25 years) was less than the SAR for all age other groups. Less than 1% (n=36,241) of all household data were retained in the retrospective study for complete case analysis, perhaps biasing our findings. We have provided measures of baseline household pediatric transmission for tracking and comparing the infectivity of later SARS-CoV-2 variants.

The Necessity of Interoperability to Uncover the Full Potential of Digital Health Devices.

Personalized health care can be optimized by including patient-reported outcomes. Standardized and disease-specific questionnaires have been developed and are routinely used. These patient-reported outcome questionnaires can be simple paper forms given to the patient to fill out with a pen or embedded in digital devices. Regardless of the format used, they provide a snapshot of the patient's feelings and indicate when therapies need to be adjusted. The advantage of digitizing these questionnaires is that they can be automatically analyzed, and patients can be monitored independently of doctor visits. Although the questions of most clinical patient-reported outcome questionnaires follow defined standards and are evaluated by clinical trials, these standards do not exist for data processing. Interoperable data formats and structures would benefit multilingual and cross-study data exchange. Linking questionnaires to standardized terminologies such as the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) and Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes (LOINC) would improve this interoperability. However, linking clinically validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires to clinical terms available in SNOMED CT or LOINC is not as straightforward as it sounds. Here, we report our approach to link patient-reported outcomes from health applications to SNOMED CT or LOINC codes. We highlight current difficulties in this process and outline ways to minimize them.

A novel approach for standardizing clinical laboratory categorical test results using machine learning and string distance similarity.

Standardizing clinical laboratory test results is critical for conducting clinical data science research and analysis. However, standardized data processing tools and guidelines are inadequate. In this paper, a novel approach for standardizing categorical test results based on supervised machine learning and the Jaro-Winkler similarity algorithm is proposed. A supervised machine learning model is used in this approach for scalable categorization of the test results into predefined groups or clusters, while Jaro-Winkler similarity is used to map text terms into standard clinical terms within these corresponding groups. The proposed method is applied to 75062 test results from two private hospitals in Bangladesh. The Support Vector Classification algorithm with a linear kernel has a classification accuracy of 98%, which is better than the Random Forest algorithm when categorizing test results. The experiment results show that Jaro-Winkler similarity achieves a remarkable 99.93% success rate in the test result standardization for the majority of groups with manual validation. The proposed method outperforms previous studies that concentrated on standardizing test results using rule-based classifiers on a smaller number of groups and distance similarities such as Cosine similarity or Levenshtein distance. Furthermore, when applied to the publicly available MIMIC-III dataset, our approach also performs excellently. All these findings show that the proposed standardization technique can be very beneficial for clinical big data research, particularly for national clinical research data hubs in low- and middle-income countries.

[Coding of laboratory parameters using the LOINC system at the Clinical Center of the University of Debrecen]. / Laboratóriumi paraméterek kódolása a LOINC-rendszer szerint a Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Központjában.

INTRODUCTION: The research utility of the bulk of the medical data generated at the Clinical Center of the University of Debrecen, which is constituted mainly by the clinical diagnostic laboratory results and medical images, is quite constrained in its present unstandardized form. The primary aim of the Big Data Research and Development project at the University of Debrecen is to facilitate data transformation and standardization to propagate its research utility for the potential end-users. Data generated in the in vitro diagnostic laboratory setting are an ideal candidate for the aforementioned goals. Data generated in Hungarian language in this particular setting are typically acronyms that do not particularly confirm to any standard norms and the transformation of these data using the globally acknowledged Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) was the primary goal of this research project. Globally the LOINC is used by healthcare providers, government agencies, insurance companies, software and device manufacturers, researchers and reference laboratories for identifying medical laboratory observations and promote unhindered fluency between various systems. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the project was to assure compliance of the various routine diagnostic laboratory parameters (n = 448) generated at the Department of Laboratory Medicine of the University of Debrecen to the LOINC system paying particular attention to and accommodating data sensitive to timeline and methodology. METHODS: Keywords allocated to individual parameters determined by the laboratory were provided by the IT service provider of the facility. The individual codes for the various parameters were manually identified using the search engine of the LOINC database available at http://www.loinc.org, only upon attainment of proficiency in use of the database and ample familiarity with the scientific literature on the topic. RESULTS: All routine diagnostic laboratory parameters were LOINC coded with no exception. The list of LOINCs' was made available on the https://labmed.unideb.hu/hu/loinc-tablazatok web link of the University of Debrecen. CONCLUSION: The transformation of diagnostic laboratory parameters to globally recognized LOINCs' improves and further facilitates the international integration of data generated at the University of Debrecen, furthermore propels communications between laboratories and parties of interest beyond international boundaries and borders. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(27): 1043-1051.

Experience from the Development of HL7 FHIR IG for Gatekeeper Project.

The GATEKEEPER (GK) Project was financed by the European Commission to develop a platform and marketplace to share and match ideas, technologies, user needs and processes to ensure a healthier independent life for the aging population connecting all the actors involved in the care circle. In this paper, the GK platform architecture is presented focusing on the role of HL7 FHIR to provide a shared logical data model to be explored in heterogeneous daily living environments. GK pilots are used to illustrate the impact of the approach, benefit value, and scalability, suggesting ways to further accelerate progress.

In support of interoperability: A laboratory perspective.

Healthcare in the United States has become increasingly digital since the passage of the HITECH Act in 2009. As a result, there is a growing need to optimize healthcare IT to allow for the interoperable exchange of data. As a result, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT has implemented their Final Rule for the 21st Century Cures Act. This requires certified health IT systems to use modernized messaging standards for the safe and secure exchange of data within health information networks and also requires the use of terminology standards including LOINC, SNOMED CT, and UCUM for coding clinical and laboratory data. Given the critical importance of laboratory results in the delivery of healthcare, laboratorians must become familiar with these principles of interoperability. Their clinical laboratory expertise is needed to appropriately structure and code test results to safeguard against improper aggregation or misinterpretation by downstream users and systems.

Automatic Outlier Detection in Laboratory Result Distributions Within a Real World Data Network.

Laboratory data must be interoperable to be able to accurately compare the results of a lab test between healthcare organizations. To achieve this, terminologies like LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers, Names and Codes) provide unique identification codes for laboratory tests. Once standardized, the numeric results of laboratory tests can be aggregated and represented in histograms. Due to the characteristics of Real World Data (RWD), outliers and abnormal values are common, but these cases should be treated as exceptions, excluding them from possible analysis. The proposed work analyses two methods capable of automating the selection of histogram limits to sanitize the generated lab test result distributions, Tukey's box-plot method and a "Distance to Density" approach, within the TriNetX Real World Data Network. The generated limits using clinical RWD are generally wider for Tukey's method and narrower for the second method, both greatly dependent on the values used for the algorithm's parameters.

Mis-mappings between a producer's quantitative test codes and LOINC codes and an algorithm for correcting them.

OBJECTIVES: To access the accuracy of the Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) mapping to local laboratory test codes that is crucial to data integration across time and healthcare systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used software tools and manual reviews to estimate the rate of LOINC mapping errors among 179 million mapped test results from 2 DataMarts in PCORnet. We separately reported unweighted and weighted mapping error rates, overall and by parts of the LOINC term. RESULTS: Of included 179 537 986 mapped results for 3029 quantitative tests, 95.4% were mapped correctly implying an 4.6% mapping error rate. Error rates were less than 5% for the more common tests with at least 100 000 mapped test results. Mapping errors varied across different LOINC classes. Error rates in chemistry and hematology classes, which together accounted for 92.0% of the mapped test results, were 0.4% and 7.5%, respectively. About 50% of mapping errors were due to errors in the property part of the LOINC name. DISCUSSIONS: Mapping errors could be detected automatically through inconsistencies in (1) qualifiers of the analyte, (2) specimen type, (3) property, and (4) method. Among quantitative test results, which are the large majority of reported tests, application of automatic error detection and correction algorithm could reduce the mapping errors further. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the mapping error rate within the PCORnet data was 4.6%. This is nontrivial but less than other published error rates of 20%-40%. Such error rate decreased substantially to 0.1% after the application of automatic detection and correction algorithm.

BGLM: big data-guided LOINC mapping with multi-language support.

Motivation: Mapping internal, locally used lab test codes to standardized logical observation identifiers names and codes (LOINC) terminology has become an essential step in harmonizing electronic health record (EHR) data across different institutions. However, most existing LOINC code mappers are based on text-mining technology and do not provide robust multi-language support. Materials and methods: We introduce a simple, yet effective tool called big data-guided LOINC code mapper (BGLM), which leverages the large amount of patient data stored in EHR systems to perform LOINC coding mapping. Distinguishing from existing methods, BGLM conducts mapping based on distributional similarity. Results: We validated the performance of BGLM with real-world datasets and showed that high mapping precision could be achieved under proper false discovery rate control. In addition, we showed that the mapping results of BGLM could be used to boost the performance of Regenstrief LOINC Mapping Assistant (RELMA), one of the most widely used LOINC code mappers. Conclusions: BGLM paves a new way for LOINC code mapping and therefore could be applied to EHR systems without the restriction of languages. BGLM is freely available at https://github.com/Bin-Chen-Lab/BGLM.

Development and Implementation of a Standard Format for Clinical Laboratory Test Results.

OBJECTIVES: Surprisingly, laboratory results, the principal output of clinical laboratories, are not standardized. Thus, laboratories frequently report results with identical meaning in different formats. For example, laboratories report a positive pregnancy test as "+," "P," or "Positive." To assess the feasibility of a widespread implementation of a result standard, we (1) developed a standard result format for common laboratory tests and (2) implemented a feedback system for clinical laboratories to view their unstandardized results. METHODS: In the largest integrated health care system in America, 130 facilities had the opportunity to collaboratively develop the standard. For 15 weeks, clinical laboratories received a weekly report of their unstandardized results. At the study's conclusion, laboratories were compared with themselves and their peers by metrics that reflected their unstandardized results. RESULTS: We rereviewed 156 million test results and observed a 51% decline in the rate of unstandardized results. The number of facilities with fewer than 23 unstandardized results per 100,000 (Six Sigma σ > 5) increased by 58% (52 to 82 facilities; ß = 1.79; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated significant improvement in the standardization of clinical laboratory results in a relatively short time. The laboratory community should create and promulgate a standardized result format.

Indexing Imaging Reports for Data Sharing: A Study of Mapping Using RadLex Playbook and LOINC.

New use cases and the need for quality control and imaging data sharing in health studies require the capacity to align them to reference terminologies. We are interested in mapping the local terminology used at our center to describe imaging procedures to reference terminologies for imaging procedures (RadLex Playbook and LOINC/RSNA Radiology Playbook). We performed a manual mapping of the 200 most frequent imaging report titles at our center (i.e. 73.2% of all imaging exams). The mapping method was based only on information explicitly stated in the titles. The results showed 57.5% and 68.8% of exact mapping to the RadLex and LOINC/RSNA Radiology Playbooks, respectively. We identified the reasons for the mapping failure and analyzed the issues encountered.

Data Element Mapping in the Data Privacy Era.

Secondary use of health data is made difficult in part because of large semantic heterogeneity. Many efforts are being made to align local terminologies with international standards. With increasing concerns about data privacy, we focused here on the use of machine learning methods to align biological data elements using aggregated features that could be shared as open data. A 3-step methodology (features engineering, blocking strategy and supervised learning) was proposed. The first results, although modest, are encouraging for the future development of this approach.

Building a Comprehensive Clinical Data Repository Using FHIR, LOINC and SNOMED.

In 2018 the University Hospital of Giessen (UHG) moved its hospital information system from an in-house solution to commercial software. The introduction of MEONA and Synedra-AIM allowed for the successful migration of clinical documents. The large pool of structured clinical data has been addressed in a second step and is now consolidated in a HAPI-FHIR server and mapped to LOINC and SNOMED for semantic interoperability in multicenter research projects, especially the German Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) and the Medical Informatics in Research and Care in University Medicine (MIRACUM) consortium.

ELaPro, a LOINC-mapped core dataset for top laboratory procedures of eligibility screening for clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Screening for eligible patients continues to pose a great challenge for many clinical trials. This has led to a rapidly growing interest in standardizing computable representations of eligibility criteria (EC) in order to develop tools that leverage data from electronic health record (EHR) systems. Although laboratory procedures (LP) represent a common entity of EC that is readily available and retrievable from EHR systems, there is a lack of interoperable data models for this entity of EC. A public, specialized data model that utilizes international, widely-adopted terminology for LP, e.g. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC®), is much needed to support automated screening tools. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to establish a core dataset for LP most frequently requested to recruit patients for clinical trials using LOINC terminology. Employing such a core dataset could enhance the interface between study feasibility platforms and EHR systems and significantly improve automatic patient recruitment. METHODS: We used a semi-automated approach to analyze 10,516 screening forms from the Medical Data Models (MDM) portal's data repository that are pre-annotated with Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). An automated semantic analysis based on concept frequency is followed by an extensive manual expert review performed by physicians to analyze complex recruitment-relevant concepts not amenable to automatic approach. RESULTS: Based on analysis of 138,225 EC from 10,516 screening forms, 55 laboratory procedures represented 77.87% of all UMLS laboratory concept occurrences identified in the selected EC forms. We identified 26,413 unique UMLS concepts from 118 UMLS semantic types and covered the vast majority of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) disease domains. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small set of common LP covers the majority of laboratory concepts in screening EC forms which supports the feasibility of establishing a focused core dataset for LP. We present ELaPro, a novel, LOINC-mapped, core dataset for the most frequent 55 LP requested in screening for clinical trials. ELaPro is available in multiple machine-readable data formats like CSV, ODM and HL7 FHIR. The extensive manual curation of this large number of free-text EC as well as the combining of UMLS and LOINC terminologies distinguishes this specialized dataset from previous relevant datasets in the literature.

Mapping the Korean National Health Checkup Questionnaire to Standard Terminologies.

OBJECTIVES: An increasing emphasis has been placed on the integration of clinical data and patient-generated health data (PGHD), which are generated outside of hospitals. This study explored the possibility of using standard terminologies to represent PGHD for data integration. METHODS: We chose the 2020 general health checkup questionnaire of the Korean Health Screening Program as a resource. We divided every component of the questionnaire into entities and values, which were mapped to standard terminologies-Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) version 2020-07-31 and Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) version 2.68. RESULTS: Eighty-nine items were derived from the 17 questions of the 2020 health examination questionnaire, of which 76 (85.4%) were mapped to standard terms. Fifty-two items were mapped to SNOMED CT and 24 items were mapped to LOINC. Among the items mapped to SNOMED CT, 35 were mapped to pre-coordinated expressions and 17 to post-coordinated expressions. Forty items had one-to-one relationships, and 17 items had one-to-many relationships. CONCLUSIONS: We achieved a high mapping rate (85.4%) by using both SNOMED CT and LOINC. However, we noticed some issues while mapping the Korean general health checkup questionnaire (i.e., lack of explanations, vague questions, and overly narrow concepts). In particular, items combining two or more concepts into a single item were not appropriate for mapping using standard terminologies. Although it is not the case that all items need to be expressed in standard terminology, essential items should be presented in a way suitable for mapping to standard terminology by revising the questionnaire in the future.

Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC®) Applied to Microbiology: A National Laboratory Mapping Experience in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) is a universal standard for identifying laboratory tests and clinical observations. It facilitates a smooth information exchange between hospitals, locally and internationally. Although it offers immense benefits for patient care, LOINC coding is complex, resource-intensive, and requires substantial domain expertise. Our objective was to provide training and evaluate the performance of LOINC mapping of 20 pathogens from 53 hospitals participating in the National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System (NNDSS). METHODS: Complete mapping codes for 20 pathogens (nine bacteria and 11 viruses) were requested from all participating hospitals to review between January 2014 and December 2016. Participating hospitals mapped those pathogens to LOINC terminology, utilizing the Regenstrief LOINC mapping assistant (RELMA) and reported to the NNDSS, beginning in January 2014. The mapping problems were identified by expert panels that classified frequently asked questionnaires (FAQs) into seven LOINC categories. Finally, proper and meaningful suggestions were provided based on the error pattern in the FAQs. A general meeting was organized if the error pattern proved to be difficult to resolve. If the experts did not conclude the local issue's error pattern, a request was sent to the LOINC committee for resolution. RESULTS: A total of 53 hospitals participated in our study. Of these, 26 (49.05%) used homegrown and 27 (50.95%) used outsourced LOINC mapping. Hospitals who participated in 2015 had a greater improvement in LOINC mapping than those of 2016 (26.5% vs. 3.9%). Most FAQs were related to notification principles (47%), LOINC system (42%), and LOINC property (26%) in 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study show that multiple stage approaches improved LOINC mapping by up to 26.5%.

Preparing Laboratories for Interconnected Health Care.

In an increasingly interconnected health care system, laboratory medicine can facilitate diagnosis and treatment of patients effectively. This article describes necessary changes and points to potential challenges on a technical, content, and organizational level. As a technical precondition, electronic laboratory reports have to become machine-readable and interpretable. Terminologies such as Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC), Nomenclature for Properties and Units (NPU), Unified Code for Units of Measure (UCUM), and SNOMED-CT can lead to the necessary semantic interoperability. Even if only single "atomized" results of the whole report are extracted, the necessary information for correct interpretation must be available. Therefore, interpretive comments, e.g., concerns about an increased measurement uncertainty must be electronically attached to every affected measurement result. Standardization of laboratory analyses with traceable standards and reference materials will enable knowledge transfer and safe interpretation of laboratory analyses from multiple laboratories. In an interconnected health care system, laboratories should strive to transform themselves into a data hub that not only receives samples but also extensive information about the patient. On that basis, they can return measurement results enriched with high-quality interpretive comments tailored to the individual patient and unlock the full potential of laboratory medicine.