Wunderlich Syndrome in a Patient With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Surgical Challenges and Management Strategies.

Wunderlich syndrome, a rare manifestation of spontaneous renal hemorrhage often attributed to renal angiomyolipomas, presents a complex clinical scenario demanding nuanced management. This article delves into the multifaceted dimensions of this syndrome, dissecting its clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic intricacies. Illustrating this complexity is the case of a 26-year-old female with Wunderlich syndrome and comorbid type 1 diabetes mellitus, revealing challenges at the intersection of these conditions. While initial intervention via laparoscopic drainage and antibiotic therapy yielded symptomatic relief, the subsequent recurrence of a renal abscess prompted a re-evaluation of the treatment strategy, culminating in a second surgical intervention. The intricate interplay between Wunderlich syndrome and diabetes introduces unique challenges, with fluctuations in hemoglobin and recurrent leukocytosis mirroring the underlying complexities of this clinical dyad. This case underscores the indispensability of a multidisciplinary approach, seamlessly integrating medical and surgical modalities, coupled with vigilant postoperative monitoring. Swift identification of complications and adaptability of the treatment plan emerged as pivotal in addressing recurrent manifestations and averting long-term sequelae. The necessity for continuous surveillance and personalized management strategies becomes evident, emphasizing Wunderlich syndrome as a clinical entity requiring bespoke attention. In conclusion, this case serves as an example, highlighting the intricate nature of Wunderlich syndrome, accentuated by the presence of type 1 diabetes mellitus. The initial therapeutic success, followed by a recurrence, underscores the need for ongoing research, paving the way for refined diagnostic and treatment paradigms. The synthesis of clinical complexities in this scenario elucidates the imperative for a comprehensive understanding, guiding future endeavors aimed at optimizing the prognosis of patients affected by this uncommon syndrome.

A case of one-stage laparoscopic drainage and ureterocystoneostomy for iatrogenic ureteral injury associated with infected urinoma.

Introduction: Iatrogenic ureteral injury is a rare but often encountered complication of abdominal and gynecological surgery. This is a case of iatrogenic ureteral injury with infected urinoma treated with one-stage laparoscopic drainage and ureterocystoneostomy. Case presentation: An 80-year-old man with rectal cancer had robot-assisted low anterior rectum resection and left lateral lymph node dissection after colostomy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy. On the 14th postoperative day, he had a fever, and a noncontrast-enhanced computed tomography scan revealed a low-density polycystic area in the left pelvic cavity. Retrograde pyelography revealed contrast medium leaking from the left lower ureter, preventing ureteral stent placement. We identified it as a delayed ureteral injury with infected urinoma and performed laparoscopic one-stage drainage and ureterocystoneostomy. Conclusion: This study reported a case of one-stage laparoscopic drainage and ureterocystoneostomy for iatrogenic ureteral injury with infected urinoma.

Analysis of pancreatic pseudocyst drainage procedural outcomes: a population based study.

BACKGROUND: A pancreatic pseudocyst is a collection of fluid surrounded by a well-defined wall that contains no solid material. Studies on outcomes of pancreatic pseudocyst drainage have largely been limited to small cohorts. This study aims to take a population based approach to evaluate differences in inpatient outcomes among laparoscopic, percutaneous, and endoscopic drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify inpatient stays for pancreatic pseudocysts in which a single drainage approach was conducted. Baseline characteristic differences were compared with Rao-Scott chi squared and Mann-Whitney U tests. Propensity score matching controlling for clinical and demographic covariates followed by multivariable regression was used to pairwise compare drainage outcomes. Primary outcomes were length of stay, total charge, mortality, and disposition. Secondary outcomes were procedure related complication rates. RESULTS: Among a total of 35,640 weighted pancreatic pseudocyst cases, 3235 underwent drainage via a single procedure. Percutaneous was the most frequent drainage method performed (44.5%) and was more likely to be performed at nonteaching hospitals than laparoscopic (17% vs 9%, p = 0.04). Percutaneous drainage was associated with longer LOS (aIRR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.86, p = 0.01) versus endoscopic and lower rates of routine disposition (aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.89, p = 0.02) relative to endoscopic and laparoscopic (aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.61, p < 0.01) drainage. There were no differences in primary outcomes in laparoscopic versus endoscopic drainage. Percutaneous drainage was associated with higher rates of septic shock than laparoscopic drainage (aOR 2.59, 95% CI 1.15-5.82, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic and laparoscopic pancreatic pseudocyst drainage are associated with the least short term procedure related complications and more favorable in-hospital outcomes compared to percutaneous approaches. However, percutaneous drainage was the most commonly performed method in the 2017 NIS database.

Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients. surgical, radiological, or endoscopic treatment? brazilian college of digestive surgery position paper / Colecistite aguda em pacientes de alto risco. tratamento cirúrgico, radiológico ou endoscópico? posicionamento do colégio brasileiro de cirurgia digestiva

ABSTRACT Acute cholecystitis (AC) is an acute inflammatory process of the gallbladder that may be associated with potentially severe complications, such as empyema, gangrene, perforation of the gallbladder, and sepsis. The gold standard treatment for AC is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, for a small group of AC patients, the risk of laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be very high, mainly in the elderly with associated severe diseases. In these critically ill patients, percutaneous cholecystostomy or endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage may be a temporary therapeutic option, a bridge to cholecystectomy. The objective of this Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery Position Paper is to present new advances in AC treatment in high-risk surgical patients to help surgeons, endoscopists, and physicians select the best treatment for their patients. The effectiveness, safety, advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of each procedure are discussed. The main conclusions are: a) AC patients with elevated surgical risk must be preferably treated in tertiary hospitals where surgical, radiological, and endoscopic expertise and resources are available; b) The optimal treatment modality for high-surgical-risk patients should be individualized based on clinical conditions and available expertise; c) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains an excellent option of treatment, mainly in hospitals in which percutaneous or endoscopic gallbladder drainage is not available; d) Percutaneous cholecystostomy and endoscopic gallbladder drainage should be performed only in well-equipped hospitals with experienced interventional radiologist and/or endoscopist; e) Cholecystostomy catheter should be removed after resolution of AC. However, in patients who have no clinical condition to undergo cholecystectomy, the catheter may be maintained for a prolonged period or even definitively; f) If the cholecystostomy catheter is maintained for a long period of time several complications may occur, such as bleeding, bile leakage, obstruction, pain at the insertion site, accidental removal of the catheter, and recurrent AC; g) The ideal waiting time between cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy has not yet been established and ranges from immediately after clinical improvement to months. h) Long waiting periods between cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy may be associated with new episodes of acute cholecystitis, multiple hospital readmissions, and increased costs. Finally, when selecting the best treatment option other aspects should also be considered, such as costs, procedures available at the medical center, and the patient's desire. The patient and his family should be fully informed about all treatment options, so they can help making the final decision.

RESUMO A colecistite aguda (CA) é um processo inflamatório agudo da vesícula biliar que pode estar associado a complicações potencialmente graves, como empiema, gangrena, perfuração da vesícula biliar e sepse. O tratamento padrão para a CA é a colecistectomia laparoscópica. No entanto, para um pequeno grupo de pacientes com CA, o risco de colecistectomia laparoscópica pode ser muito alto, principalmente em idosos com doenças graves associadas. Nestes pacientes críticos, a colecistectomia percutânea ou a drenagem endoscópica da vesícula biliar guiada por ultrassom podem ser uma opção terapêutica temporária, como ponte para a colecistectomia. O objetivo deste artigo de posicionamento do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva é apresentar novos avanços no tratamento da CA em pacientes cirúrgicos de alto risco, para auxiliar cirurgiões, endoscopistas e clínicos a selecionar o melhor tratamento para os seus pacientes. A eficácia, segurança, vantagens, desvantagens e resultados de cada procedimento são discutidos. As principais conclusões são: a) Pacientes com CA e risco cirúrgico elevado devem ser tratados preferencialmente em hospitais terciários onde a experiência e os recursos cirúrgicos, radiológicos e endoscópicos estão disponíveis. b) A modalidade de tratamento ideal para pacientes com elevado risco cirúrgico, deve ser individualizada, com base nas condições clínicas e na experiência disponível. c) A colecistectomia laparoscópica continua sendo uma excelente opção de tratamento, principalmente em hospitais em que a drenagem da vesícula biliar percutânea ou endoscópica não está disponível. d) A colecistostomia percutânea e a drenagem endoscópica da vesícula biliar devem ser realizadas apenas em hospitais bem equipados e com radiologista intervencionista e/ou endoscopista experientes. e) O cateter de colecistostomia deve ser removido após a resolução da CA. No entanto, em pacientes que não têm condição clínica para realizar colecistectomia, o cateter pode ser mantido por um período prolongado ou mesmo definitivamente. f) Se o cateter de colecistostomia for mantido por longo período de tempo podem ocorrer várias complicações, como sangramento, fístula biliar, obstrução, dor no local de inserção, remoção acidental do cateter e CA recorrente. g) O tempo de espera ideal entre a colecistostomia e a colecistectomia ainda não foi estabelecido, e vai desde imediatamente após a melhoria clínica, até meses após. h) Longos períodos de espera entre colecistostomia e colecistectomia podem estar associados a novos episódios de CA, múltiplas readmissões hospitalares e aumento dos custos. Finalmente, ao selecionar a melhor opção de tratamento, outros aspectos também devem ser considerados, como custos, disponibilidade dos procedimentos no centro médico e o desejo do paciente. O paciente e sua família devem ser completamente informados sobre todas as opções de tratamento, para que possam ajudar a tomar a decisão final.

Laparoscopic hemostasis and drainage for postpartum retroperitoneal hematoma complicated with an infection: A case report and surgical video.

Introduction: and importance: Postpartum retroperitoneal hematomas are a potential complication of childbirth. The management of secondary infections of such hematomas has not been fully elucidated. We present a typical case of such management via laparoscopic surgery, and include a surgical video. Case presentation: A woman in her 20s experienced fever and right lower quadrant pain and distension on postpartum day 2. Pelvic examination revealed a hump on the vaginal wall on the right side of the uterine cervix, and ultrasonography revealed a hematoma. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed no active extravasation into the hematoma. Conservative antibiotic treatment was started; however, on postpartum day 6, her pain increased and her C-reactive protein concentration and white blood cell count were high. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a paravaginal/upper vaginal wall hematoma (80 × 70 × 63 mm) located to the right of the uterus and bladder. Hence, laparoscopic drainage was performed on postpartum day 7. The retroperitoneal hematoma was incised and drained. The source of bleeding was the right vaginal vein, and bleeding was halted via electrocoagulation. The patient's symptoms improved immediately, and the postoperative course was uneventful. Clinical discussion: The laparoscopic approach enabled immediate hemostasis and identification of the source of bleeding. The drainage route was cleaner than would be possible via a vaginal approach, possibly preventing postoperative retrograde re-infection. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery for postpartum retroperitoneal hematoma with infection was useful for both drainage and hemostasis.

Successful minimally invasive surgery for postpartum retroperitoneal hematoma complicated by an infection: Two case reports.

INTRODUCTION: and importance Postpartum retroperitoneal hematoma is a birth canal injury that is difficult to diagnose because of its invisibility. Secondary infections of these hematomas are rare, and their diagnostic and management strategies have not been fully elucidated. We present two cases of postpartum retroperitoneal hematomas with infection, which were successfully treated with minimally invasive surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1 was of a 2X-year-old woman who presented with complaints of fever; a provisional diagnosis of chorioamnionitis and Streptococcus pyogenes-induced sepsis was made. Case 2 was of a 3X-year-old woman who underwent uterine artery embolization and manual removal of the placenta for suspected placenta accreta. Both cases were diagnosed with adnexal hematomas, and antibiotic therapy failed in both patients. Therefore, we performed exploratory laparoscopy and made a diagnosis of retroperitoneal hematomas with infection; laparoscopic drainage resulted in rapid resolution of the clinical symptoms and abnormal blood test results. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Once an abscess develops, antibiotic treatment has a limited effect, and surgical drainage should be performed. Management of retroperitoneal hematomas is difficult, especially when complicated by an infection. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive procedures involving laparoscopy could be beneficial for the management of postpartum retroperitoneal hematomas complicated by an infection.

Successful laparoscopic management of a hepatic abscess caused by a fish bone.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic abscess is a rare condition but comes with heavy consequences if not diagnosed and managed properly. Early detection of this pathology is challenging because of the variety and lack of specificity of symptoms but is necessary for accurate management. CASE REPORT: We report a case of pyogenic liver abscess secondary to the migration of an ingested fish bone in a 74-year-old female. We used laparoscopic surgery to drain the abscess, remove the foreign body responsible and look for the perforation site. Parenteral antibiotherapy was added to the surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis of hepatic abscess caused by the migration of a foreign body remains a challenge. In our opinion, laparoscopic surgery associated with antibiotics is the safest and most effective therapeutic option.

Acute liver abscess after non-operative management of blunt liver injury: A rare case managed with laparoscopic drainage.

INTRODUCTION: Liver abscess may develop as a rare complication of the non-operative management (NOM) of blunt liver injury. PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old male was injured in a motorcycle accident on November 28, 2017. First aid was performed at the local hospital, then he was transferred to our trauma center for further management. The abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a segment 7/8 liver laceration, and the liver injury was of grade III according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale for liver injury. Intermittent high fever was observed for the first 3 days after NOM, and repeat abdominal CT showed an abscess with rupture at the previously injured liver parenchyma. He underwent laparoscopic drainage of the liver abscess, and culture revealed the presence of Salmonella enterica, serogroup D. After laparoscopic drainage, the patient recovered well, with a 21-day hospital stay. DISCUSSION: Liver abscess as a complication after NOM of blunt liver injury is a rare entity, with an incidence rate of 1.5%. It is usually seen in major liver injuries (grade III and above) and the abscesses take a median of 6 days (range, 1-12 days) to form and be diagnosed. The management of liver abscess may be by surgical drainage (laparotomy or laparoscopy) or percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSION: This report reminds us the liver abscess complication after NOM of blunt liver injury, although it is a rare entity. Results of this patient support drainage of the liver abscess can be safely and effectively performed by laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts: experience at a general hospital in Mexico City.

BACKGROUND: Invasive management of pancreatic pseudocysts (PP) is currently indicated in those patients with symptoms or complications. Treatment options are classified as surgical (open and laparoscopic) and non-surgical (endoscopic and radiologic). AIM: To describe the morbidity, mortality, and efficacy in terms of technical and clinical success of the laparoscopic surgical approach in the treatment of patients with PP in the last 3 years at our hospital center. METHODS: We included patients with PP treated with laparoscopic surgery within the time frame of January 2012 and December 2014. The morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure were determined, together with the postoperative results in terms of effectiveness and recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were diagnosed with PP within the last 3 years, but only 20 of them had invasive treatment. Laparoscopic surgery was performed on 17 of those patients (mean pseudocyst diameter of 15.3, primary drainage success rate of 94.1%, complication rate of 5.9%, and a 40-month follow-up). CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained with the laparoscopic technique used at our hospital center showed that this approach is feasible, efficacious, and safe. Thus, performed by skilled surgeons, it should be considered a treatment option for patients with PP.

Liver abscesses with pyopericardium: Laparoscopic management in a preterm neonate.

We report a 28-day-old neonate presenting with signs of fever, abdominal distension, and refusal to feed. The baby was diagnosed to have multiple liver abscesses which ruptured and a tract lead to the pericardium resulting in a pyo-pericardium. Laparoscopic drainage of the abscess cavities and the pyo-pericardium was performed. An extensive search of the literature revealed that this case is the youngest one to have undergone such simultaneous laparoscopic drainage.

Hemi-hepatectomia esquerda laparoscópica para o abscesso hepático piogênico: relato de caso / Lapaoscopic leftt hemi-hepatectomy for pyogenic hepatic abscess: a case report

Introdução. O tratamento padrão do abscesso hepático piogênico tem sido drenagem percutânea. Quando ocorre a falha desse método, a drenagem cirúrgica, ou mesmo a ressecção hepática, deve ser realizada. Atualmente, a via laparoscópica tem sido eleita como preferencial para as afecções hepáticas benignas devido à baixa morbidade e bom resultado estético. Relato do caso. Os autores relatam um caso de abscesso hepático piogênico tratado por hemi-hepatectomia esquerda laparoscópica. O doente apresentou evolução pós-operatória sem complicações. Não houve recidiva do abscesso no período de um ano de seguimento. Conclusão. O tratamento do abscesso hepático piogênico por hemi-hepatectomia esquerda laparoscópica representa um método seguro com baixa morbidade e bom resultado estético.

Introduction. Percutaneous drainage has been standard treatment for pyogenic liver abscess. When this approach fails surgical drainage or even hepatic resection should be performed. Nowadays, laparoscopic access has been chosen as preferential treatment for benign hepatic diseases due to both low morbidity and good cosmetic result.Case. The authors present a case of pyogenic hepatic abscess treated by means of laparoscopic left hemi-hepatectomy. The patient presented good postoperative evolution without complication. There was no abscess recurrence (one year follow-up period). Conclusion. Pyogenic hepatic abscess treatment by means of laparoscopic left hemi-hepatectomy represents a safe technique with both low morbidity and good cosmetic result.