The reflux symptom score has good screening value for laryngopharyngeal reflux.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the consistency between the reflux symptom score (RSS) and the multitemporal salivary pepsin test in screening for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the screening value of the RSS for LPR by simultaneously administering daytime multitemporal salivary pepsin test and RSS to patients. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective observational study. All included patients underwent simultaneous daytime multitemporal salivary pepsin testing and RSS. A participant was considered to have LPR when one or more positive salivary pepsin test results or RSS score > 13 were obtained. The consistency between the multitemporal salivary pepsin test and the RSS was compared by the weighted Cohen's kappa statistic. The screening value of the RSS for LPR was investigated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were included. The positivity rate of LPR was 71.64% according to the results of the multitemporal salivary pepsin test. According to RSS, the positive rate of LPR was 70.15%. The weighted Kappa value between the multitemporal salivary pepsin test and the RSS was 0.675 (p < 0.001). The area under curve of RSS screening for LPR was 0.843 (p < 0.01), and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RSS screening for LPR were 89.58%, 78.95%, 91.49%, and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a good consistency between the RSS and the multitemporal salivary pepsin test, and the RSS has a good screening value for LPR, which can be applied to screen for LPR in otolaryngologic patients.

Image analysis in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: A road less traveled.

Background: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a common condition affecting patients reporting to an otolaryngologist. However, the diagnosis of this condition is usually hinged on the combination of largely non-specific symptoms, and clinical findings on laryngoscopy. This study aimed at evaluating the utility of digital image analysis to quantitatively evaluate the severity of signs as recorded with laryngoscopy in patients of LPRD. Methods: The study group included individuals who were aged between 18 and 65 years and reported to the ENT OPD. These were then divided into two groups depending on symptoms and laryngoscopic findings. The LPRD group had symptomatic patients with an Reflux finding score (RFS) score >7. Those with an RFS of <6 were designated as the 'Normal group'. The Laryngoscopic images were recorded and analyzed using Image J software as per the set protocol. The Red Green Blue (RGB) values of the laryngoscopic images of each group were obtained and subjected to statistical analysis. Results: 200 participants were enrolled in the study with 100 participants in the LPRD group (mean age = 46.2, 40 males, 60 females) and 100 in the control group (mean age = 43.6, 55 males, 45 females). The measured RGB values were more in the LPRD group as compared to the control group and the results were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: By providing an objective value to the degree of inflammation, RGB value measurement provides a quick, economical, adaptable tool for auxiliary and corroborative information for the diagnosis of LPRD.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Management: A Narrative Review.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common and often misinterpreted clinical entity responsible for various symptoms affecting the upper aerodigestive tract. This narrative literature review aims to review the pathophysiology, symptoms, and management of LPR, emphasizing the emerging understanding of gastric content reflux in aerodigestive tissue irritation. Understanding the pathophysiology of LPR will allow general practitioners and specialists to accurately recognize and treat a condition that causes substantial morbidity in the affected patients. Using evidence-based findings from randomized controlled trials, clinical studies, and meta-analyses, the present investigation aims to outline and unify previous research into LPR. A review of anatomical structures, pathogenic mechanisms, endoscopic findings in LPR, and clinical manifestations and treatment options are also discussed. Though controversy around the diagnosis and management of LPR persists, emerging research in cellular damage and diagnostic tools promises to provide increasingly accurate and reliable modalities for characterizing LPR. Hopefully, future research will unify the field and provide overarching guidelines for both primary care and specialists. The present investigation provides an integrated perspective on LPR, a clinically prevalent and complex disease.

Outcomes of Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF 2.0): A Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study in Academic and Community Practices (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is an established safe endoscopic technique for the management of GERD but with variable efficacy. In the last decade, the TIF technology and technique have been optimized and more widely accepted but data on outcomes outside clinical trials are limited. We tracked patient-reported and clinical outcomes of GERD patients after TIF 2.0. METHODS: Patients with BMI < 35, hiatal hernia < 2cm, and confirmed GERD with typical and/or atypical symptoms from 9 academic and community medical centers were enrolled in a prospective registry and underwent after TIF 2.0 performed by gastroenterologists and surgeons. The primary outcomes were safety and clinical success (response in >2 of 4 endpoints). Secondary endpoints were symptom improvement, acid exposure time (AET), esophagitis healing, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and satisfaction. Outcomes were assessed at last follow-up within 12 months. RESULTS: 85 patients underwent TIF 2.0, 81 were included in the outcomes analysis. Clinical success was achieved in 94%, GERD-HRQL scores improved in 89%, and elevated RSI score normalized in 85% of patients with elevated baseline. Patient satisfaction improved from 8% to 79% (p <0.0001). At baseline, 81% were taking at least daily PPI, while 80% were on no or occasional PPI after TIF 2.0 (p<0.0001). Esophageal AET was normal in 72%, greater with an optimized TIF 2.0 valve >300 degree circumference, >3cm length (94% vs 57%, p=0.007). There were no TIF 2.0-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: TIF 2.0 is a safe and effective endoscopic outpatient treatment option for select patients with GERD.

Treatment Outcomes of Intralesional Steroid Injection for Refractory Vocal Process Granuloma.

OBJECTIVES: Vocal process granuloma (VPG) is a chronic condition resulting from a mucoperichondrial injury of vocal process. Initial conservative treatment typically involves vocal hygiene education and antireflux medication. Treatment challenges arise with refractory cases. Outcomes of second-line treatments such as surgical excision and botulinum toxin injections remain inconsistent. Thus, we propose this study to investigate the effectiveness of intralesional steroid injections for refractory VPG. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 23 patients with VPG who showed no improvement after 3 months of proton pump inhibitors. These patients underwent one to three courses of monthly in-office intralesional steroid injections as a second-line therapy. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by measuring the size of the VPG relative to the length of the vocal folds before and after the final injection procedure. RESULTS: Results showed a significant reduction in VPG size from baseline of 27.74 ± 15.06 to 5.48 ± 8.95 (p < .001). 15 out of 23 patients were responsive (size reduction ≥ 75%) to intralesional steroid injection. Alcohol consumption and longer symptom duration were associated with a poor response (size reduction <75%), whereas prior intubation was associated with better response. CONCLUSIONS: For refractory VPG not responding to conservative treatment, intralesional steroid injection appears to be a promising alternative option without significant adverse effects.

The Impact of a Twice-daily vs Once-daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing Regimen on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background/Aims: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) play a crucial role in managing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), but the optimal dosing regimen remains unclear. We aim to compare the effectiveness of the same total PPI dose administered twice daily versus once daily in LPR patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial at a tertiary referral hospital, enrolling a total of 132 patients aged 19-79 with LPR. These patients were randomly assigned to receive either a 10 mg twice daily (BID) or a 20 mg once daily (QD) dose of ilaprazole for 12 weeks. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) were assessed at 8 weeks and 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the RSI response, defined as a reduction of 50% or more in the total RSI score from the baseline. We also analyzed the efficacy of the dosing regimens and the impact of dosing and duration on treatment outcomes. Results: The BID group did not display a higher response rate for RSI than the QD group. The changes in total RSI scores at the 8-week and 16-week visits showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Total RFS alterations were also comparable between both groups. Each dosing regimen demonstrated significant decreases in RSI and RFS. Conclusions: Both BID and QD PPI dosing regimens improved subjective symptom scores and objective laryngoscopic findings. There was no significant difference in RSI improvement between the 2 dosing regimens, indicating that either dosing regimen could be considered a viable treatment option.

Reflux Finding Score and Reflux Symptom Index Potential Indicators for Diagnosis and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.

Retrograde movement of gastric contents into the pharynx is termed Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR). It represents an extraesophageal manifestation associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The objective of the study is to investigate the clinical profile of LPR and its response to treatment. Three hundred consecutive patients who presented to the ENT outpatient department with a clinical profile of LPR were selected. The patients' symptoms were assessed using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), followed by an endoscopic examination of the larynx and scoring using the Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Patients were started on LPR treatment if they had an RSI score of 13 and an RFS of more than 7. The patients were then started on medication and monitored for three months. The most common symptom in our research sample (52%) was a foreign body sensation in the throat. On endoscopic examination of the larynx, the most common sign was hyperemia/erythema of laryngeal tissue, especially bilateral arytenoids. Most of our patients responded favorably to a combination of pantoprazole (40 mg) and domperidone (30 mg) for 4 weeks. This was measured by the reduction in RSI and RFS scores. LPR is a frequently encountered clinical entity, and otorhinolaryngologists should consider it when treating patients with chronic symptoms such as throat pain and voice changes. Appropriate LPR diagnosis and care can help prevent unnecessary prescriptions for antibiotics and surgical interventions in these patients.

Evaluation of Subjective and Objective Voice Characteristics in Patients With Bulimia Nervosa.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to examine subjectively and objectively the voice changes in bulimia nervosa (BN) patients at different stages of treatment. METHOD: The study was conducted with a study group including 10 patients followed up with a diagnosis of BN and a control group consisting of 10 healthy participants of a similar age group without eating disorders. The Reflux Symptom Index (RFS) was used for stroboscopic evaluation. The fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, shimmer, and noise-to-harmonics ratio were determined during acoustic voice analysis. Maximum phonation time was analyzed. A subjective evaluation was performed using the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10). RESULTS: Jitter, shimmer, VHI-10 score, and RFS values showed a statistically significant difference in the patient and control groups (P < 0.05). The mean values of jitter, shimmer, VHI-10 score, and RFS were higher in the patient group than in the control group. Maximum phonation time did not differ between groups (P > 0.05) Age and F0 (Hz) values showed no statistically significant difference in the patient and control groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In BN patients, the laryngopharyngeal reflux mechanism causes negative effects on vocal cord examination and acoustic sound analysis parameters, leading to subjective dissatisfaction.

Endoscopic Features of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a complex inflammatory condition affecting the nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been implicated as a potential exacerbating factor in CRS, but the specific endoscopic features of nasopharyngeal pathology in this context remain poorly understood. Background and Objectives: Chronic rhinosinusitis is a multifactorial disease with various underlying etiologies, including inflammation, anatomical factors, and environmental triggers. While gastroesophageal reflux disease has been suggested as a potential contributor to chronic rhinosinusitis, the specific endoscopic features indicative of nasopharyngeal pathology in CRS patients with GERD symptoms have not been clearly elucidated. Our aim is to identify specific endoscopic features of nasopharyngeal pathology in patients with CRS associated with GERD symptoms and to propose a method for assessing the influence of gastroesophageal reflux disease on the mucosal layer of the nose and nasopharynx. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study involving 521 adult patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of CRS. From this cohort, 95 patients with the highest scores on the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) questionnaires were selected as the main group. Endoscopic examinations were performed to assess the nasal and nasopharyngeal mucosa. Results: Our study revealed significant alterations in the nasopharyngeal mucosa of patients with CRS associated with GERD symptoms. Increased vascularity of the nasopharyngeal mucosa was observed in 91 patients (95.7%), while hypertrophy was noted in 83 patients (87.4%). Mucus was present in the nasopharynx of 77 patients (81.1%), exhibiting varying characteristics of color and consistency. Asymmetric hypertrophy of the oropharyngeal mucosa was noted in 62 patients (65.3%). Conclusions: We propose a method for assessing the influence of gastroesophageal reflux disease on the mucosal layer of the nose and nasopharynx, which may aid in diagnostic and management decisions. Further research is warranted to explore the potential impact of GERD symptoms on the course and severity of CRS exacerbations.

Unveiling vocal profiles in adolescent anorexia nervosa: a Software Based, Multiparametric Analysis.

Dysphonia, characterized by disturbances in voice quality and modulation, has been sporadically observed in individuals with Anorexia Nervosa (AN), potentially stemming from both organic and psychopathological factors. This study seeks to employ software-based voice analysis to compare the voices of girls with AN to those of female healthy controls (HC). Case-control study adopting "Praat" software to assess voices. Various parameters, including Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), Fundamental Frequency (F0), Yanagihara's Spectrographic Dysphonia Classifications, and "GIRBAS" perceptual qualitative voice rating, were investigated. Participants completed questionnaires for Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) and the Reflux Symptoms Index (RSI). Puberty-related voice spectrum changes were considered, and Bonferroni-corrected BMI-adjusted Analyses of Covariance (ANCOVAs) were conducted. The study enrolled 15 girls with AN and 23 girls with HC. AN patients demonstrated greater impairment in voice tiredness/voice avoidance (VFI-1, p < 0.001), vocal physical discomfort (VIF-2, p = 0.002), and rest as alleviation (VFI-3, p = 0.012). Reflux-related scores were higher in AN (p < 0.001). Differences were observed in voice quality (AVQI) (p = 0.001), and GIRBAS scales showed alterations in multiple parameters. Spectrograms documented more frequent pathological findings in AN patients (p = 0.021). No difference was observed in Fundamental Frequency. These group (AN/HC) differences were independent of weight measures. This study is the first to connect voice irregularities in AN by employing standardized, non-invasive tools and accounting for weight-related factors. Young AN patients demonstrated substantial voice quality changes and heightened self-reported symptoms. Future research should expand on these findings with prospective designs and invasive investigations.

Gastric distension and atelectasis after using a supraglottic airway - A case report.

BACKGROUND: Supraglottic airways (SGAs) are used during general anesthesia (GA) due to comfort. Certain complications are possible, such as gastric distension. The incidence of pulmonary aspiration of regurgitated gastric contents was found to be 0.02%. A difference in the incidence of gastric regurgitation was not identified between the use of SGAs and endotracheal intubation. We report a case of gastric distension and atelectasis in a patient in whom an I-gel® was used for GA. CASE: A 63-year-old female patient underwent triple arthrodesis on her ankle under GA using an SGA (I-gel® size 3). After surgery, she suffered from nausea and abdominal bloating. A chest radiograph revealed that a large amount of air in her stomach had caused gastric distention, which resulted in left hemidiaphragm elevation and atelectasis. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates that the use of I-gel® in prolonged surgeries may result in malposition of the SGA and gastric insufflation and atelectasis.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis: Factors associated with patient satisfaction.

PURPOSE: To examine the patient experience of laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis and factors that contributed to perceived difficulty with the process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 32-question anonymous survey was administered to individuals over 18 years old who reported a diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux. The survey contained questions regarding demographics and individuals' experiences during the diagnostic workup along with the generic short patient experiences questionnaire. Percentages were calculated for all variables. Kendall rank correlation coefficient was performed to measure the strength and direction of association between laryngopharyngeal reflux workup and perceived difficulty with diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 232 respondents, 59.9 % reported difficulty with the diagnostic process. Strong positive correlations were found between perceived difficulty with laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis and the following factors: total number of physicians seen (τb = 0.483, p < 0.001), time from symptom onset (τb = 0.300, p < 0.001), and time from first physician visit (τb = 0.479, p < 0.001). Results from the generic short patient experiences questionnaire showed moderate negative correlations between perceived difficulty with diagnosis and the following factors: perceived competence of physician (τb = -0.228, p < 0.001), perception that the physician cared for the patient (τb = -0.253, p < 0.001), perceived interest the physician had in the patient (τb = -0.259, p < 0.001), and time interacting with the physician (τb = -0.226, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Respondents report difficulty being diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux. This correlates with increased time to receive a diagnosis, increased number of physicians seen, and factors related to the patient-physician relationship. Physicians can improve patient experience by focusing on clear communication with interactive patient appointments, and scheduling high yield diagnostic tests.

The Revised Reflux Symptom Index (R-RSI): Development, Internal and External Validation Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study proposes a revised version of the Reflux Symptom Index (R-RSI), a seventeen-item questionnaire that was revised to increase the suspicion of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). METHODS: Internal validation involved 213 participants, comprising 160 subjects without a previous LPRD diagnosis and 53 subjects with a self-reported previous diagnosis of LPRD with or without gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were calculated. For the external validation, 56 patients (independent from the previous cohort) were enrolled to explore the R-RSI screening properties and determine a cutoff using 24-h MII-pH as the gold standard. RESULTS: R-RSI test-retest reliability was high, both for the total score (ICC: 0.970) and for each item (ranging from 0.876 to 0.980). Cronbach's alpha was 0.910, indicating excellent internal consistency of the questionnaire. Participants with a previous self-reported diagnosis scored significantly higher (mean 24.94 ± 7.4; median 26, IQR 20-29) than those without a previous diagnosis (mean 4.66 ± 5.3; median 4, IQR 1-6) (p value <0.0001). Participants with both previous LPRD and GERD diagnoses had higher scores (27.20 ± 7.8) compared to those with only LPRD (21.77 ± 5.5) (p value = 0.003). Using 24-h MII-pH diagnosis as a gold standard, the optimal R-RSI cutoff point was determined to be 18, with a sensitivity of 84.5% and a specificity of 81.8%, positive predictive value of 95%, and negative predictive value of 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the R-RSI may be useful to suspect LPRD, with or without GERD. The R-RSI is a self-administered patient-reported outcome questionnaire that demonstrates excellent reliability and high screening properties. Employing a cutoff of ≥18 in the R-RSI can assist in diagnosing and monitoring LPRD.

Impact of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients with Voice Disorders.

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the presence of laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with voice disorders thereby aiding in the early management and improving the quality of life. Study Design: Cross Sectional study. Methods: This cross sectional study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital, patients with history of voice change for more than 3 weeks were included, and divided into 4 groups depending upon the level of voice use. Patients were asked to fill Koufmann Reflux Symptom Index questionnaire followed by video laryngoscopy and findings were plotted according to Reflux Finding Score. Based on the scoring, impact of LPRD in patient with voice disorders was analysed. Results: Among the 90 study participants, 74 (82.2%) were found to have LPRD. The mean age was 42.76 ± 10.33 years. Majority (43.2%) belong to the age group of 41-50 years, with female predominance (70.3%). Majority (41.9%) of them were level IV voice users. 59.5% were positive Koufman reflex symptom index, 67.6% were positive Reflex finding score. Hoarseness (58.1%) the most common symptom. Conclusion: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease has to be considered in patients presenting with hoarseness of voice for more than three weeks. Simple and highly reproducible scores like Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score proven useful and valuable tools in diagnosing LPRD thereby aiding in early diagnosis and prompt management and improves the patient's quality of life. Level of Evidence: Level 1.

Psychosocial burden in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms with and without pathologic acid reflux.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms, with or without pathologic reflux, frequently have poor response to standard therapies, which may be a result of overlapping cognitive-affective processes. Therefore, the aims of this study included measuring psychosocial distress and laryngeal-specific cognitive distress in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms (LPS) as well as comparing these among laryngeal symptomatic patients with and without conclusive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: This prospective, single-center study enrolled adults with chronic LPS from 9/22 to 6/23. Patients completed eight questionnaires on quality of life, symptom burden, and psychosocial distress. The laryngeal cognitive affective tool (LCAT) assessed laryngeal-specific hypervigilance and anxiety; LCAT scores ≥33 were elevated. All patients underwent objective testing with endoscopy and/or ambulatory reflux monitoring and were categorized as proven GERD (GER+) or no proven GERD (GER-). KEY RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients were included: 66% female, mean age 54.1 (17.5) years, mean BMI 27.6 (6.8) kg/m2, 66% Caucasian, 57% with an elevated LCAT, and 53% GER+. Moderate-to-severe anxiety was found in 39% and moderate-to-severe depression in 19%. An elevated LCAT alone or with an elevated anxiety/depression score was found in 58%. Patient-reported outcomes scores, including LCAT scores (32.9 (13.8) GER- vs. 33.1 (12.6) GER+, p = 0.91), were similar between patients with and without GER+. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Patients with chronic LPS experience heightened levels of hypervigilance, symptom-specific anxiety, and psychosocial distress, regardless of the presence of pathologic GER.

Narrative review of relationship between chronic cough and laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as a possible cause of chronic cough is known for decades. However, more than 75% of patients with extraoesophageal symptoms do not suffer from typical symptoms of GERD like pyrosis and regurgitations and have negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. For such a condition term laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) was introduced and is used for more than two decades. Since the comprehensive information on relationship between chronic cough and LPR is missing the aim of this paper is to summarize current knowledge based on review of published information during last 13 years. Laryngopharyngeal reflux is found in 20% of patients with chronic cough. The main and recognized diagnostic method for LPR is 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring, revealing reflux episodes irritating the upper and lower respiratory tract mucosa. The treatment of LPR should be initiated with dietary and lifestyle measures, followed by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and other measures. Despite progress, more research is needed for accurate diagnosis and targeted therapies. Key areas for exploration include biomarkers for diagnosis, the impact of non-acid reflux on symptom development, and the efficacy of new drugs. Further studies with a focused population, excluding other causes like asthma, and using new diagnostic criteria for LPR are essential. It's crucial to consider LPR as a potential cause of unexplained chronic cough and to approach diagnosis and treatment with a multidisciplinary perspective.

Correlation of Dry Eye Disease and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Based on Improved Symptoms With Combined Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation between dry eye disease (DED) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) from the perspective of treatment response. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional studies. SETTING: Analysis of data from patients with DED-related symptoms and LPR-related symptoms from May 2022 to January 2023 at AIER Eye Hospital (Hainan). METHODS: The Ocular Surface Symptom Index (OSDI) scales and The Reflux Symptom Score (RSS) were investigated in patients attending China Aier Eye Hospital (Hainan) from May 2022 to January 2023, and OSDI scores >12 were categorized as DED, and RSS scores >13 were categorized as suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (suspected LPR). Patients with DED and suspected LPR were randomly divided into three groups (group A: 0.3% sodium vitreous acid drops and 1% cyclosporine A drops only; group B: 0.3% sodium vitreous acid drops, 1% cyclosporine A drops, and Gastroftal tablets containing magnesium alginate and cimicifuga oil and esomeprazole; and group C: Gastroftal tablets and esomeprazole only orally) and were reviewed after 3 months for the RSS- and DED-related examinations. RESULT: Two hundred and nineteen patients were enrolled. One hundred and ninety-one DED-positive and 28 DED-negative patients, 84 suspected LPR-positive and 135 LPR-negative patients, and the OSDI scores of LPR patients were significantly higher than those of LPR-negative patients (P < 0.001). Parameters related to DED and LPR were significantly lower in patients in group B than in groups A and C after treatment (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LPR and DED are closely related. For patients with both LPR and DED, treating LPR and DED at the same time may be a better option.

A Study on the Prevalence of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Saudi Arabia.

Introduction Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a condition characterized by the backflow of gastric contents rising through the esophagus, affecting the aerodigestive tract and leading to throat symptoms such as hoarseness, chronic cough, and throat clearing. LPR is recognized as a separate condition from gastroesophageal reflux disease, despite the fact that they both involve the backflow of the stomach contents as their primary pathology. Our study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of LPR within the population of Saudi Arabia. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using an electronic questionnaire from August to November 2023, involving participants from all five regions of Saudi Arabia. A total of 1140 participants completed the questionnaire, which included the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) to assess the prevalence of LPR. Results LPR was found to be prevalent in 31.2% of the study population, with the most common associated demographics being female gender (p = 0.032) and adults aged 36-45 years (p = 0.006). However, no significant relationship was observed based on region of residence or other demographic factors such as education level or occupation. Conclusion LPR has a high prevalence in the population of Saudi Arabia. Therefore, further research and awareness about this condition are warranted to better understand its impact, improve diagnosis, and develop appropriate management strategies.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: Updated examination of mechanisms, pathophysiology, treatment, and association with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is an inflammatory condition in the laryngopharynx and upper aerodigestive tract mucosa caused by reflux of stomach contents beyond the esophagus. LPRD commonly presents with sym-ptoms such as hoarseness, cough, sore throat, a feeling of throat obstruction, excessive throat mucus. This complex condition is thought to involve both reflux and reflex mechanisms, but a clear understanding of its molecular mechanisms is still lacking. Currently, there is no standardized diagnosis or treatment protocol. Therapeutic strategies for LPRD mainly include lifestyle modifications, proton pump inhibitors and endoscopic surgery. This paper seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing literature regarding the mechanisms, patho-physiology and treatment of LPRD. We also provide an in-depth exploration of the association between LPRD and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Esophageal Baseline Impedance is Associated with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Treatment Response.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of distal esophageal mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI), a general marker of esophageal mucosal barrier integrity, in predicting laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and symptomatic response to acid reflux therapy. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 173 patients who presented with symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux and underwent 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) testing. Mean nocturnal baseline impedance values were calculated and assessed for their association and ability to predict LPR symptoms, MII-pH results, treatment response, and other markers of LPR. RESULTS: Notably, 153 of the 173 patients were tested off acid suppression medication and included in statistical analysis. Based on the MII-pH probe data, 108 (71%) patients had LPR, 8 (5%) had gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and 37 (24%) were without pathologic reflux. Distal esophageal MNBI of LPR patients was significantly lower in LPR patients than patients with negative studies (1332 ± 94.8 vs. 2158 ± 173.5, p = 0.001). Among 118 patients who trialed antireflux therapy, a distal esophageal MNBI cutoff value of <1580 Ω was an independent predictor of treatment response (OR = 4.148 [1.877-9.189]). This value better predicted improvement with antireflux therapy for LPR than other objective MII-pH probe data, which were not independent predictors of treatment response. CONCLUSION: Distal esophageal MNBI values may have value in the diagnosis of LPR and potentially predict medication responsiveness in LPR patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:4071-4077, 2024.