Problems with gestational age estimation by last menstrual period and ultrasound among late antenatal care attendant women in a low-resource setting in Africa, Sudan.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate estimation of gestational age is essential to interpret and manage several maternal and perinatal indicators. Last menstrual period (LMP) and ultrasound are the two most common methods used for estimating gestational age. There are few published studies comparing the use of LMP and ultrasound in Sub-Saharan Africa to estimate gestational age and no studies on this topic in Sudan. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Gadarif Maternity Hospital in Sudan during November through December 2022. Sociodemographic information was collected, and the date of the first day of each participant's LMP was recorded. Ultrasound examinations were performed (measuring crown-rump length in early pregnancy and biparietal diameter and femur length in late pregnancy) using a 3.5-MHz electronic convex sector probe. Bland-Altman analysis was performed. RESULTS: Four-hundred seventy-six pregnant women were enrolled. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age and gravidity was 24.0 (20.0‒29.0) years and 2 (1‒4), respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between gestational age determined by LMP and ultrasound (r = 0.921, P < 0.001). The mean gestational age estimate according to LMP was higher than that determined by ultrasound, with a difference, on average, of 0.01 week (95% confidence interval [CI]: - 0.05, 0.07). Bland-Altman analysis showed the limits of agreement varied from - 1.36 to 1.38 weeks. A linear regression analysis showed proportional bias. The coefficient of difference of the mean was equal to 0.26 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.03, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on our results, there was a bias in LMP-based gestational age estimates when compared with the reproducible method (ultrasound).

Correcting for measurement error in assessing gestational age in a low-resource setting: a regression calibration approach.

Introduction: Measurement error in gestational age (GA) may bias the association of GA with a health outcome. Ultrasound-based GA is considered the gold standard and is not readily available in low-resource settings. We corrected for measurement error in GA based on fundal height (FH) and date of last menstrual period (LMP) using ultrasound from the sub-cohort and adjusted for the bias in associating GA with neonatal mortality and low birth weight (< 2,500 grams, LBW). Methods: We used data collected from 01/2015 to 09/2019 from pregnant women enrolled at two public hospitals in Siaya county, Kenya (N = 2,750). We used regression calibration to correct for measurement error in FH- and LMP-based GA accounting for maternal and child characteristics. We applied logistic regression to associate GA with neonatal mortality and low birth weight, with and without calibrating FH- and LMP-based GA. Results: Calibration improved the precision of LMP (correlation coefficient, ρ from 0.48 to 0.57) and FH-based GA (ρ from 0.82 to 0.83). Calibrating FH/LMP-based GA eliminated the bias in the mean GA estimates. The log odds ratio that quantifies the association of GA with neonatal mortality increased by 29% (from -0.159 to -0.205) by calibrating FH-based GA and by more than twofold (from -0.158 to -0.471) by calibrating LMP-based GA. Conclusion: Calibrating FH/LMP-based GA improved the accuracy and precision of GA estimates and strengthened the association of GA with neonatal mortality/LBW. When assessing GA, neonatal public health and clinical interventions may benefit from calibration modeling in settings where ultrasound may not be fully available.

Diagnostic value of a questionnaire for term assessment among women seeking abortion.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2020 in France, at-home medical abortion (AHMA) has been authorised for up to nine weeks of gestation. All consultations can be performed via teleconsultation. The determination of gestational age (GA) by interrogation avoids a systematic ultrasound and facilitates the care pathway. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a questionnaire to determine a GA lower than seven or nine weeks of gestation (WG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study carried out on patients requesting an abortion in the Gynaecology Department of the North and Conception hospitals (Hôpital Nord and la Conception), AP-HM (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille), from 2 November 2021 to 1 September 2022. A modified translated questionnaire was evaluated. The questionnaire was published in June 2020 by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) to ensure access to abortion in England. All patients included in the study completed the questionnaire and received an ultrasound. We assessed the diagnostic value of the questionnaire for determining GA below seven or nine WG. RESULTS: Seven hundred and forty-eight patients were included in the study. The sensitivity of the questionnaire for determining patients with a GA of less than seven and nine WG was 84% and 93%, with a positive predictive value of 71.4% and 91.8% respectively. DISCUSSION: The study showed that the questionnaire had good diagnostic value for the selection of patients of under nine WG. Thus, women with limited access to ultrasounds could avoid them.

Changes in cerebral blood flow parameters among preterm 30-34 week neonates who are initiated on kangaroo mother care - A prospective analytical observational study.

BACKGROUND: Kangaroo mother care (KMC) is recommended standard of care for preterm neonates. They are vulnerable for cerebral blood flow (CBF) fluctuations linked to intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia, which have implications on neurodevelopment. This study was designed to document any change in CBF in middle cerebral artery (MCA) of stabilized preterm 30-34 weeks neonates who are initiated on KMC. METHODS: We designed a prospective analytical observational study in a tertiary care neonatal unit. We enrolled 30-34 weeks preterm neonates eligible for KMC after their stabilization (n = 40). CBF was measured in supine position via right MCA Doppler through the temporal window before any KMC, after 2 h of 1st KMC session and following 24 h of 1st session. CBF was quantified in terms of pulsatility index (PI), Resistive Index (RI), peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), mean velocity (MV) and values were compared against the existing normative values. RESULTS: Mean gestation of study population was 31.91 weeks with a mean birth weight of 1432.75 g. Median day of initiation of KMC was 7 days with mean duration of KMC on day 1 was 4.56 h. We could find statistically significant decrease in the values of PI and RI from 90th centile towards 50th centile of normative values with a mean difference of 0.22 (99 % CI 0.02-0.43, p 0.005) for PI and 0.05 (99 % CI 0.02-0.07, p = 0.000) for RI post the first session of KMC. Following 24 h of 1st KMC session, we could find a significant increase in values of PSV, EDV and MV comparing values of pre-initiation with day 2 pre-KMC but values of PI and RI were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: CBF among 30-34 week preterm neonates tend to optimize after initiation of KMC.

Does Timing of Levonorgestrel Insertion in Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Affect its Expulsion and Bleeding Pattern? A Follow-Up Study.

Background: Levonorgestrel Intra Uterine System insertion for contraception is preferred in the follicular phase. However, the ideal time of insertion for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding is not stated clearly. The aim of our study is to find out the effect of timing of insertion on expulsion and irregular bleeding pattern post insertion. Methods: A follow-up study of patients with LNG-IUS for AUB was conducted. They were grouped into four based on the day of insertion from Last Menstrual Period (LMP). The pattern of irregular bleeding post insertion was compared with odds ratio and the expulsion rate was compared with log rank test. Results: The most common indication for the 76 patients was ovulatory dysfunction (39.4%) followed by Adenomyosis (36.84%). Those who had LNG-IUS insertion from day 22-30 had quicker expulsions of 25% of patients by 3 months. By 6 months and later expulsion rate was much higher in the luteal phase than the follicular phase (p < 0.03). The least risk of moderate or heavy bleeding was for the 8-15 day group when compared to the 22-30 day group, the odds ratio being 0.03 [95% CI: (0.01-0.2)]. Conclusion: Based on expulsion rate alone, insertion of LNG-IUS at any time in the follicular phase is ideal. Considering both expulsion rate and pattern of bleeding the ideal time would be late follicular phase, that is 8-15th day.

Influence of different methods for calculating gestational age at birth on prematurity and small for gestational age proportions: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recognizing premature newborns and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) is essential for providing care and supporting public policies. This systematic review aims to identify the influence of the last menstrual period (LMP) compared to ultrasonography (USG) before 24 weeks of gestation references on prematurity and SGA proportions at birth. METHODS: Systematic review with meta-analysis followed the recommendations of the PRISMA Statement. PubMed, BVS, LILACS, Scopus-Elsevier, Embase-Elsevier, and Web-of-Science were searched (10-30-2022). The research question was: (P) newborns, (E) USG for estimating GA, (C) LMP for estimating GA, and (O) prematurity and SGA rates for both methods. Independent reviewers screened the articles and extracted the absolute number of preterm and SGA infants, reference standards, design, countries, and bias. Prematurity was birth before 37 weeks of gestation, and SGA was the birth weight below the p10 on the growth curve. The quality of the studies was assessed using the New-Castle-Ottawa Scale. The difference between proportions estimated the size effect in a meta-analysis of prevalence. RESULTS: Among the 642 articles, 20 were included for data extraction and synthesis. The prematurity proportions ranged from 1.8 to 33.6% by USG and varied from 3.4 to 16.5% by the LMP. The pooled risk difference of prematurity proportions revealed an overestimation of the preterm birth of 2% in favor of LMP, with low certainty: 0.02 (95%CI: 0.01 to 0.03); I2 97%). Subgroup analysis of USG biometry (eight articles) showed homogeneity for a null risk difference between prematurity proportions when crown-rump length was the reference: 0.00 (95%CI: -0.001 to 0.000; I2: 0%); for biparietal diameter, risk difference was 0.00 (95%CI: -0.001 to 0.000; I2: 41%). Only one report showed the SGA proportions of 32% by the USG and 38% by the LMP. CONCLUSIONS: LMP-based GA, compared to a USG reference, has little or no effect on prematurity proportions considering the high heterogeneity among studies. Few data (one study) remained unclear the influence of such references on SGA proportions. Results reinforced the importance of qualified GA to mitigate the impact on perinatal statistics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number PROSPERO: CRD42020184646.

Comparison of alternative gestational age assessment methods in a low resource setting: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Accurate gestational age (GA) determination allows correct management of high-risk, complicated or post-date pregnancies and prevention or anticipation of prematurity related complications. Ultrasound measurement in the first trimester is the gold standard for GA determination. In low- and middle-income countries elevated costs, lack of skills and poor maternal access to health service limit the availability of prenatal ultrasonography, making it necessary to use alternative methods. This study compared three methods of GA determination: Last Normal Menstrual Period recall (LNMP), New Ballard Score (NBS) and New Ballard Score corrected for Birth Weight (NBS + BW) with the locally available standard (Ultrasound measurement in the third trimester) in a low-resource setting (Tosamaganga Council Designated Hospital, Iringa, Tanzania). METHODS: All data were retrospectively collected from hospital charts. Comparisons were performed using Bland Altman method. RESULTS: The analysis included 70 mother-newborn pairs. Median gestational age was 38 weeks (IQR 37-39) according to US. The mean difference between LNMP vs. US was 2.1 weeks (95% agreement limits - 3.5 to 7.7 weeks); NBS vs. US was 0.2 weeks (95% agreement limits - 3.7 to 4.1 weeks); NBS + BW vs. US was 1.2 weeks (95% agreement limits - 1.8 to 4.2 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, NBS + BW was the least biased method for GA determination as compared with the locally available standard. However, wide agreement bands suggested low accuracy for all three alternative methods. New evidence in the use of second/third trimester ultrasound suggests concentrating efforts and resources in further validating and implementing the use of late pregnancy biometry for gestational age dating in low and middle-income countries.

Identification of pregnancies and infants within a US commercial healthcare administrative claims database.

PURPOSE: Health care insurance claims databases are becoming a more common data source for studies of medication safety during pregnancy. While pregnancies have historically been identified in such databases by pregnancy outcomes, International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) Z3A codes denoting weeks of gestation provide more granular information on pregnancies and pregnancy periods (i.e., start and end dates). The purpose of this study was to develop a process that uses Z3A codes to identify pregnancies, pregnancy periods, and links infants within a commercial health insurance claims database. METHODS: We identified pregnancies, gestation periods, pregnancy outcomes, and linked infants within the US-based Optum Research Database between 2015 and 2020 via a series of algorithms utilizing diagnosis and procedure codes on claims. The diagnosis and procedure codes included ICD-10-CM codes, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes. RESULTS: We identified 1 030 874 pregnancies among 841 196 women of reproductive age. Of pregnancies with livebirth outcomes, 84% were successfully linked to infants. The prevalence of pregnancy outcomes (livebirth, stillbirth, ectopic, molar, and abortion) was similar to national estimates. CONCLUSIONS: This process provides an opportunity to study drug safety and care patterns during pregnancy and may be replicated in other claims databases containing ICD-10-CM, CPT, and HCPCS codes. Work is underway to validate and refine the various algorithms.

Acardius acephalus with spontaneous umbilical cord occlusion: Reporting a rare case.

Twin reversed arterial perfusion syndrome is a rare obstetric condition that occurs in monochorionic twin pregnancies, resulting in coexistence of a normal "pump" twin and an acardiac twin. The acardiac twin is dependent upon the normal twin to provide circulation by means of vascular anastomosis, thereby putting the pump fetus at risk of high output cardiac failure. Overall only 50% of pump twins survive. Mortality for acardiac twin is 100%. We present a case of 26-year-old primigravida female presenting with 8 months of amenorrhea with unsure LMP. Ultrasonography followed by fetal MRI was carried out which revealed acardius acephalus twin with absence of blood flow in umbilical vessels. Pump twin had multicystic dysplastic left kidney with single umbilical artery. Following delivery, the pump twin survived well and the deformed fetus showed features of twin reversed arterial perfusion syndrome.

Accuracy of self-assessment of gestational duration among people seeking abortion.

BACKGROUND: Mifepristone, used together with misoprostol, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for medication abortion through 10 weeks' gestation. Although in-person ultrasound is frequently used to establish medication abortion eligibility, previous research demonstrates that people seeking abortion early in pregnancy can accurately self-assess gestational duration using the date of their last menstrual period. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we establish the screening performance of a broader set of questions for self-assessment of gestational duration among a sample of people seeking abortion at a wide range of gestations. STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed patients seeking abortion at 7 facilities before ultrasound and compared self-assessments of gestational duration using 11 pregnancy dating questions with measurements on ultrasound. For individual pregnancy dating questions and combined questions, we established screening performance focusing on metrics of diagnostic accuracy, defined as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity (or the proportion of ineligible participants who correctly screened as ineligible for medication abortion), and proportion of false negatives (ie, the proportion of all participants who erroneously screened as eligible for medication abortion). We tested for differences in sensitivity across individual and combined questions using McNemar's test, and for differences in accuracy using the area under the receiver operating curve and Sidak adjusted P values. RESULTS: One-quarter (25%) of 1089 participants had a gestational duration of >70 days on ultrasound. Using the date of last menstrual period alone demonstrated 83.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 78.4-87.9) in identifying participants with gestational durations of >70 days on ultrasound, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.85) and a proportion of false negatives of 4.0%. A composite measure of responses to questions on number of weeks pregnant, date of last menstrual period, and date they got pregnant demonstrated 89.1% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 84.7-92.6) and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.88), with 2.7% of false negatives. A simpler question set focused on being >10 weeks or >2 months pregnant or having missed 2 or more periods had comparable sensitivity (90.7%; 95% confidence interval, 86.6-93.9) and proportion of false negatives (2.3%), but with a slightly lower area under the receiver operating curve (0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.84). CONCLUSION: In a sample representative of people seeking abortion nationally, broadening the screening questions for assessing gestational duration beyond the date of the last menstrual period resulted in improved accuracy and sensitivity of self-assessment at the 70-day threshold for medication abortion. Ultrasound assessment for medication abortion may not be necessary, especially when requiring ultrasound could increase COVID-19 risk or healthcare costs, restrict access, or limit patient choice.

Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort.

BACKGROUND: Different formulae have been developed globally to estimate gestational age (GA) by ultrasonography in the first trimester of pregnancy. In this study, we develop an Indian population-specific dating formula and compare its performance with published formulae. Finally, we evaluate the implications of the choice of dating method on preterm birth (PTB) rate. This study's data was from GARBH-Ini, an ongoing pregnancy cohort of North Indian women to study PTB. METHODS: Comparisons between ultrasonography-Hadlock and last menstrual period (LMP) based dating methods were made by studying the distribution of their differences by Bland-Altman analysis. Using data-driven approaches, we removed data outliers more efficiently than by applying clinical parameters. We applied advanced machine learning algorithms to identify relevant features for GA estimation and developed an Indian population-specific formula (Garbhini-GA1) for the first trimester. PTB rates of Garbhini-GA1 and other formulae were compared by estimating sensitivity and accuracy. RESULTS: Performance of Garbhini-GA1 formula, a non-linear function of crown-rump length (CRL), was equivalent to published formulae for estimation of first trimester GA (LoA, - 0.46,0.96 weeks). We found that CRL was the most crucial parameter in estimating GA and no other clinical or socioeconomic covariates contributed to GA estimation. The estimated PTB rate across all the formulae including LMP ranged 11.27-16.50% with Garbhini-GA1 estimating the least rate with highest sensitivity and accuracy. While the LMP-based method overestimated GA by 3 days compared to USG-Hadlock formula; at an individual level, these methods had less than 50% agreement in the classification of PTB. CONCLUSIONS: An accurate estimation of GA is crucial for the management of PTB. Garbhini-GA1, the first such formula developed in an Indian setting, estimates PTB rates with higher accuracy, especially when compared to commonly used Hadlock formula. Our results reinforce the need to develop population-specific gestational age formulae.

A Comparison of the Accuracy of Various Methods of Postnatal Gestational Age Estimation; Including Ballard Score, Foot Length, Vascularity of the Anterior Lens, Last Menstrual Period and Also a Clinician's Non-Structured Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Gestational age is a strong determinant of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Early obstetric ultrasound is the clinical reference standard, but is not widely available in many developing countries. METHODS: A prospectively designed diagnostic accuracy study in a tertiary referral hospital in a developing country. Early ultrasound (<20 weeks) was the clinical reference standard. Methods evaluated included anthropometric measurements (including foot length), vascularity of the anterior lens, the New Ballard Score and last menstrual period. Clinicians' non-structured global impression 'End of Bed' Assessment was also evaluated. RESULTS: 106 babies were included in the study. Median age at birth was 34 weeks (interquartile range 29-36). Ballard Score and 'End of Bed' Assessment had a mean bias of -0.14 and 0.06 weeks respectively but wide 95% limits of agreement. The physical component of the Ballard score, the total Ballard score and Foot length's ability to discriminate between term and preterm infants gave an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.97, 0.96 and 0.95, respectively. DISCUSSION: Although 'End of Bed' Assessment and Ballard score had small mean biases, the wide confidence intervals render the methods irrelevant in clinical practice. Foot length was particularly poor in Small for Gestational Age infants. None of the methods studied were superior to a non-structured clinician's informal 'End of Bed' Assessment. CONCLUSION: None of the methods studied met the a priori definition of clinical usefulness. Improving access to early ultrasound remains a priority. Instead of focusing on chronological accuracy, future research should compare the ability of early ultrasound and Ballard score to predict morbidity and mortality. Lay summary. BACKGROUND: Gestational age describes the time interval between conception and the delivery of the baby. Babies born before 37 weeks of gestation (preterm) or after 42 weeks of gestation (post-dates) have an increased risk of death and specific illnesses. The best way to estimate the gestational age is to perform an ultrasound scan on the mother before 20 weeks. However, this is not widely available in many developing countries. Methods to estimate gestational age after birth include calculating the time from the last period, various measurements of the child (such as weight, foot length or head circumference) physical and neurological markers of maturity and examination of the blood vessels on the lens in the eye. METHODS: In this study, we assessed how accurate these methods were when compared with the best available method; early ultrasound. We also analyzed the clinicians own personal feeling of what the most likely gestation was, based on an informal 'end of bed' assessment. If a method was to be deemed clinically useful it was agreed that it would have to confidently identify the gestation to within 1 week of the true gestation. RESULTS: None of the methods studied could confidently predict the gestational age of individual babies within 1 week. Ballard scoring and the clinician's informal 'End of Bed' Assessment were the most accurate and also had the smallest inter-operator variability when the results of two separate researchers were compared. Foot length performed particularly badly with babies who were small for their gestational age. CONCLUSION: None of the methods studied confidently predicted gestational age within a week, so have little use in clinical practice. Access to early ultrasound should be improved. Further research into the relationship between maturity markers such as the Ballard score and the rates of death and specific premature related illnesses is warranted.

Gestational age data completeness, quality and validity in population-based surveys: EN-INDEPTH study.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth (gestational age (GA) <37 weeks) is the leading cause of child mortality worldwide. However, GA is rarely assessed in population-based surveys, the major data source in low/middle-income countries. We examined the performance of new questions to measure GA in household surveys, a subset of which had linked early pregnancy ultrasound GA data. METHODS: The EN-INDEPTH population-based survey of 69,176 women was undertaken (2017-2018) in five Health and Demographic Surveillance System sites in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau and Uganda. We included questions regarding GA in months (GAm) for all women and GA in weeks (GAw) for a subset; we also asked if the baby was 'born before expected' to estimate preterm birth rates. Survey data were linked to surveillance data in two sites, and to ultrasound pregnancy dating at <24 weeks in one site. We assessed completeness and quality of reported GA. We examined the validity of estimated preterm birth rates by sensitivity and specificity, over/under-reporting of GAw in survey compared to ultrasound by multinomial logistic regression, and explored perceptions about GA and barriers and enablers to its reporting using focus group discussions (n = 29). RESULTS: GAm questions were almost universally answered, but heaping on 9 months resulted in underestimation of preterm birth rates. Preference for reporting GAw in even numbers was evident, resulting in heaping at 36 weeks; hence, over-estimating preterm birth rates, except in Matlab where the peak was at 38 weeks. Questions regarding 'born before expected' were answered but gave implausibly low preterm birth rates in most sites. Applying ultrasound as the gold standard in Matlab site, sensitivity of survey-GAw for detecting preterm birth (GAw <37) was 60% and specificity was 93%. Focus group findings suggest that women perceive GA to be important, but usually counted in months. Antenatal care attendance, women's education and health cards may improve reporting. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published study assessing GA reporting in surveys, compared with the gold standard of ultrasound. Reporting GAw within 5 years' recall is feasible with high completeness, but accuracy is affected by heaping. Compared to ultrasound-GAw, results are reasonably specific, but sensitivity needs to be improved. We propose revised questions based on the study findings for further testing and validation in settings where pregnancy ultrasound data and/or last menstrual period dates/GA recorded in pregnancy are available. Specific training of interviewers is recommended.

The onset of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting are experienced by most women during pregnancy. The onset is usually related to Last Menstrual Period (LMP) the date of which is often unreliable. This study describes the time to onset of nausea and vomiting symptoms from date of ovulation and compares this to date of last menstrual period METHODS: Prospective cohort of women seeking to become pregnant, recruited from 12 May 2014 to 25 November 2016, in the United Kingdom. Daily diaries of nausea and vomiting were kept by 256 women who were trying to conceive. The main outcome measure is the number of days from last menstrual period (LMP) or luteinising hormone surge until onset of nausea or vomiting. RESULTS: Almost all women (88%) had Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin rise within 8 to 10 days of ovulation; the equivalent interval from LMP was 20 to 30 days. Many (67%) women experience symptoms within 11 to 20 days of ovulation. CONCLUSIONS: Onset of nausea and vomiting occurs earlier than previously reported and there is a narrow window for onset of symptoms. This indicates that its etiology is associated with a specific developmental stage at the foetal-maternal interface. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01577147 . Date of registration 13 April 2012.

Relationship Between Foot Length and Gestational Age in Pakistan.

Preterm births have a high risk of mortality. Therefore, knowledge of the gestational age (GA) at birth is crucial to guide the appropriate management of a newborn. Common methods for estimating GA such as the last menstrual period, ultrasonography, and post-natal Ballard scoring have some limitations. This study aimed to determine the relationship between foot length and GA to develop and validate an equation for predicting GA of Pakistani newborns. We conducted a prospective study in a large obstetric hospital in Pakistan. Data for this analysis were extracted from the hospital files of eligible women by trained study midwives. Midwives were also trained in performing the Ballard examination and taking foot length using a disposable measuring tape within an hour of the birth. The GA was calculated using an android-based GA calculator. Simple and multiple linear regression were used to construct predicting equations for GA. Both the foot length and GA were available for 1542 cases. The median GA was 34.5 (IQR 4.7) weeks and the median foot length was 7 cm (IQR 1.4). There was a positive linear relationship between foot length and GA (r 2 81.7%, P-value < .001). Stratified analysis showed an r 2 of 81.7% for males and 81.6% for females. The r 2 for stillbirths was 84.1% and, 82.3% for live births. The r 2 for macerated stillbirths was 88.6% and 90.6% for fresh stillbirths. In resource poor settings, the use of foot length can estimate GA in both live births and stillbirths and can easily identify preterm infants.

Blood gene transcript signature profiling in pregnancies resulting in preterm birth: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To pursue a systematic review and summarise the current evidence for the potential of transcriptome molecular profiling in investigating the preterm phenotype. STUDY DESIGN: We systematically reviewed the literature, using readily available electronic databases (i.e. PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science) from inception until March 2020 to identify investigations of maternal blood-derived RNA profiling in preterm birth (PTB). Studies were included if circulating coding or non-coding RNA was analysed in maternal blood during pregnancy and/or at delivery. Interventional trials were not included. The primary outcome was the availability of whole genome expression patterns evaluated in pregnancies resulting in preterm deliveries. RESULTS: A total of 35 articles were included in the final analysis. Most of the studies were conducted in high-income countries and published in the last decade. Apart from spontaneous PTB, a variety of phenotypes leading to preterm delivery were reported. Differences in sampling methods, target gene selection and laboratory protocols severely limited any quantitative comparisons. Most of the studies revealed that gene expression profiling during pregnancy has high potential for identifying women at risk of spontaneous and/or non-spontaneous PTB as early as in the first trimester. CONCLUSION: Assessing maternal blood-derived transcriptional signatures for PTB risk in pregnant women holds promise as a screening approach. However, longitudinally followed, prospective pregnancy cohorts are lacking. These are relevant for identifying causes leading to PTB and whether prediction of spontaneous PTB or co-morbidities associated with PTB is achievable. More emphasis on widely employed standardised protocols is required to ensure comparability of results.

Early termination of pregnancy: differences in gestational age estimation using last menstrual period and ultrasound in Mexico.

BACKGROUND: Gestational age estimation is key to the provision of abortion, to ensure safety and successful termination of pregnancy. We compared gestational age based on reported last menstrual period and ultrasonography among a large sample of women in Mexico City's public first trimester abortion program, Interrupcion Legal de Embarazo (ILE). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 43,219 clinical records of women seeking abortion services in the public abortion program from 2007 to 2015. We extracted gestational age estimates in days based on last menstrual period and ultrasonography. We calculated the proportion of under- and over-estimation of gestational age based on last menstrual period versus ultrasonography. We compared overall differences in estimates and focused on discrepancies at two relevant cut-offs points (70 days for medication abortion eligibility and 90 days for ILE program eligibility). RESULTS: On average, ultrasonography estimation was nearly 1 (- 0.97) days less than the last menstrual period estimation (SD = 13.9), indicating women tended to overestimate the duration of their pregnancy based on recall of date of last menstrual period. Overall, 51.4% of women overestimated and 38.5% underestimated their gestations based on last menstrual period. Using a 70-day limit, 93.8% of women who were eligible for medication abortion based on ultrasonography would have been correctly classified using last menstrual period estimation alone. Using the 90-day limit for ILE program eligibility, 96.0% would have been eligible for first trimester abortion based on last menstrual period estimation alone. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of women can estimate gestational age using last menstrual period date. Where available, ultrasonography can be used, but it should not be a barrier to providing care.

Fetal Gestational Age Determination using Ultrasound Placental Thickness.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study are to sonographically measure the placental thickness (PT) in normal fetuses; to correlate it with gestational age (GA), fetal growth parameters, and estimated fetal weight (EFW); and to design a nomogram for the derived PT measurements. METHODS: This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study on 400 women with apparently normal pregnancy within the age range of 18-45 years recruited from the Antenatal Clinic of our hospital. The fetal GA was estimated by the last menstrual period (LMP). The fetal growth parameters were determined using standard sonographic methods while the PT was measured at the level of the umbilical cord insertion site. PT was then correlated with GA, fetal growth parameters, and the EFW. RESULTS: The mean PT (mean ± standard deviation) in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd trimesters and the whole duration of pregnancy were 14.5 ± 0.3 mm, 24.6 ± 3.9 mm, 34.8 ± 2.8 mm, and 29.6 ± 7.1 mm, respectively. PT ranged from 13.5 ± 1.9 mm at 11 weeks to 39.1 ± 0.6 mm at 40 weeks. PT (in mm) had a linear relationship and a statistically significant positive correlation with GA (in weeks) in all the trimesters, with most significant correlation recorded in the 2nd trimester (r = 0.79). There was also a statistically significant positive correlation between PT and the fetal growth parameters (biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length and crown-rump length), and EFW. PT nomogram was developed from 11 to 40 weeks of gestation using a scatter plot with 95% confidence interval for our locality. CONCLUSION: PT has a linear relationship with GA, fetal growth parameters, and EFW and it can be used along with other fetal growth parameters to increase the accuracy for predicting GA in normal pregnancies, especially when the subject is not sure of or does not know her LMP.

Adherence to Swedish national pregnancy dating guidelines and management of discrepancies between pregnancy dating methods: a survey study.

BACKGROUND: Swedish national guidelines for pregnancy dating were published in 2010. Follow-up is needed to assess adherence and to identify whether any clinical topics are not covered in the guidelines. METHODS: All units in Sweden that performed ultrasound-based pregnancy dating were asked to complete a web-based questionnaire comprising multiple-response questions and commentary fields. Information was collected regarding baseline information, current and previous clinical practice, and management of discrepancies between last-menstrual-period- and ultrasound-based methods for pregnancy dating. RESULTS: The response rate was 79%. Half of the units offered first-trimester ultrasound to all pregnant women. However, contrary to the guidelines, the crown-rump length was not used for ultrasound-based pregnancy dating in most units. Instead, ultrasound-based pregnancy dating was performed only if the biparietal diameter was between 21 and 55 mm. Management of discrepancies between methods for pregnancy dating varied widely. CONCLUSIONS: The units reported high adherence to national guidelines, except for early pregnancy dating, for which many units followed unwritten or informal guidelines. The management of discrepancies between last-menstrual-period-based and ultrasound-based estimated day of delivery varied widely. These findings emphasize the need for regular updating of national written guidelines and efforts to improve their implementation in all units.

Early Identification of Preterm Neonates at Birth With a Tablet App for the Simplified Gestational Age Score (T-SGAS) When Ultrasound Gestational Age Dating Is Unavailable: Protocol for a Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: Although rates of preterm birth continue to increase globally, identification of preterm from low birth weight infants remains a challenge. The burden of low birth weight vs preterm is greatest in resource-limited settings, where gestational age (GA) prior to delivery is frequently not known because ultrasound in early pregnancy is not available and estimates of the date of the mother's last menstrual period (LMP) may not be reliable. An alternative option is to assess GA at birth to optimize referral and care of preterm newborns. We previously developed and pilot-tested a system to measure the simplified gestational age score (SGAS) based on 4 easily observable neonatal characteristics. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to adapt the scoring system as a tablet app (potentially scalable approach) to assess feasibility of use and to validate whether the scoring system accurately predicts prematurity by itself, over and above birth weight in a large sample of newborns. METHODS: The study is based in Nagpur, India, at the Research Unit of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development's Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research. The Android tablet app for the SGAS (T-SGAS) displays de-identified photographs of skin, breasts, and genitalia across a range of GAs and line drawings of infant posture. Each item is associated with a score. The user is trained to choose the photograph or line drawing that most closely matches the newborn being evaluated, and the app determines the neonate's GA category (preterm or term) from the cumulative score. The validation study will be conducted in 3 second level care facilities (most deliveries in India occur in hospitals, and women known to be at risk of preterm birth are referred to second level care facilities). Within 24 hours of delivery, women and their babies who are stable will be enrolled in the study. Two auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs) blinded to prior GA assessments will use the T-SGAS to estimate the GA status of the newborn. An independent data collector will abstract the GA from the ultrasound recorded in the hospital chart and record the date of the mother's LMP. Eligibility for analysis is determined by the ultrasound and LMP data being collected within 1 week of each other to have a rigorous assessment of true GA. RESULTS: Publication of the results of the study is anticipated in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Until GA dating by ultrasound is universally available and easy to use in resource-limited settings, and where there are restrictions on ultrasound use due to their use for sex determination and abortion of female fetuses, this study will determine whether the T-SGAS app can accurately assess GA in risk categories at birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02408783; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02408783 (Archived by Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/75S2kmr3T). INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/11913.