High sodium intake and fluid overhydration predict cardiac structural and functional impairments in chronic kidney disease.

Background: High sodium intake and fluid overhydration are common factors of and strongly associated with adverse outcomes in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Yet, their effects on cardiac dysfunction remain unclear. Aims: The study aimed to explore the impact of salt and volume overload on cardiac alterations in non-dialysis CKD. Methods: In all, 409 patients with CKD stages 1-4 (G1-G4) were enrolled. Daily salt intake (DSI) was estimated by 24-h urinary sodium excretion. Volume status was evaluated by the ratio of extracellular water (ECW) to total body water (TBW) measured by body composition monitor. Recruited patients were categorized into four groups according to DSI (6 g/day) and median ECW/TBW (0.439). Echocardiographic and body composition parameters and clinical indicators were compared. Associations between echocardiographic findings and basic characteristics were performed by Spearman's correlations. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis were used to determine the associations between DSI and ECW/TBW in the study groups and the incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and elevated left ventricular filling pressure (ELVFP). In addition, the subgroup effects of DSI and ECW/TBW on cardiac abnormalities were estimated using Cox regression. Results: Of the enrolled patients with CKD, the median urinary protein was 0.94 (0.28-3.14) g/d and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 92.05 (IQR: 64.52-110.99) mL/min/1.73 m2. The distributions of CKD stages G1-G4 in the four groups was significantly different (p = 0.020). Furthermore, compared to group 1 (low DSI and low ECW/TBW), group 4 (high DSI and high ECW/TBW) showed a 2.396-fold (95%CI: 1.171-4.902; p = 0.017) excess risk of LVH and/or ELVFP incidence after adjusting for important CKD and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Moreover, combined with eGFR, DSI and ECW/TBW could identify patients with higher cardiac dysfunction risk estimates with an AUC of 0.704 (sensitivity: 75.2%, specificity: 61.0%). The specificity increased to 85.7% in those with nephrotic proteinuria (AUC = 0.713). The magnitude of these associations was consistent across subgroups analyses. Conclusion: The combination of high DSI (>6 g/d) and high ECW/TBW (>0.439) independently predicted a greater risk of LVH or ELVFP incidence in non-dialysis CKD patients. Moreover, the inclusion of eGFR and proteinuria improved the risk stratification ability of DSI and ECW/TBW in cardiac impairments in CKD.

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Evolving Understanding.

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a clinical syndrome in which patients have signs and symptoms of HF due to high left ventricular (LV) filling pressure despite normal or near normal LV ejection fraction. It is more common than HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and its diagnosis and treatment are more challenging than HFrEF. Although hypertension is the primary risk factor, coronary artery disease and other comorbidities, such as atrial fibrillation (AF), diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and obesity, also play an essential role in its formation. This review summarizes current knowledge about HFpEF, its pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, current treatments, and promising novel treatments. It is essential to continue to be updated on the latest treatments for HFpEF so that patients always receive the most therapeutic treatments. The use of GnRH agonists in the management of HFpEF, infusion of Apo a-I nanoparticle, low-level transcutaneous vagal stimulation (LLTS), and estrogen only in post-menopausal women are promising strategies to prevent diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF; however, there is still no proven curative treatment for HFpEF yet.

Cardiac magnetic resonance left ventricular filling pressure is linked to symptoms, signs and prognosis in heart failure.

AIMS: Left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) can be estimated from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We aimed to investigate whether CMR-derived LVFP is associated with signs, symptoms, and prognosis in patients with recently diagnosed heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This study recruited 454 patients diagnosed with HF who underwent same-day CMR and clinical assessment between February 2018 and January 2020. CMR-derived LVFP was calculated, as previously, from long- and short-axis cines. CMR-derived LVFP association with symptoms and signs of HF was investigated. Patients were followed for median 2.9 years (interquartile range 1.5-3.6 years) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization, non-fatal stroke, and non-fatal myocardial infarction. The mean age was 62 ± 13 years, 36% were female (n = 163), and 30% (n = 135) had raised LVFP. Forty-seven per cent of patients had an ejection fraction < 40% during CMR assessment. Patients with raised LVFP were more likely to have pleural effusions [hazard ratio (HR) 3.2, P = 0.003], orthopnoea (HR 2.0, P = 0.008), lower limb oedema (HR 1.7, P = 0.04), and breathlessness (HR 1.7, P = 0.01). Raised CMR-derived LVFP was associated with a four-fold risk of HF hospitalization (HR 4.0, P < 0.0001) and a three-fold risk of MACE (HR 3.1, P < 0.0001). In the multivariable model, raised CMR-derived LVFP was independently associated with HF hospitalization (adjusted HR 3.8, P = 0.0001) and MACE (adjusted HR 3.0, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Raised CMR-derived LVFP is strongly associated with symptoms and signs of HF. In addition, raised CMR-derived LVFP is independently associated with subsequent HF hospitalization and MACE.

Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Role of Cardiovascular and Lung Ultrasound beyond Ejection Fraction.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is considered a major health care problem with frequent decompensations, high hospitalization and mortality rates. In severe heart failure (HF), the symptoms are refractory to medical treatment and require advanced therapeutic strategies. Early recognition of HF sub- and decompensation is the cornerstone of the timely treatment intensification and, therefore, improvement in the prognosis. Echocardiography is the gold standard for the assessment of systolic and diastolic functions. It allows one to obtain accurate and non-invasive measurements of the ventricular function in HF. In severely compromised HF patients, advanced cardiovascular ultrasound modalities may provide a better assessment of intracardiac hemodynamic changes and subclinical congestion. Particularly, cardiovascular and lung ultrasound allow us to make a more accurate diagnosis of subclinical congestion in HFrEF. The aim of this review was to summarize the advantages and limitations of the currently available ultrasound modalities in the ambulatory monitoring of patients with HFrEF.

The effect of urgent blood pressure reduction on left atrial strain in patients with hypertensive attack : Blood pressure lowering affects LA strain.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) strain is a robust measure of LA function and is a useful parameter to assess left ventricular filling pressure. While initially considered as a "load-independent" parameter of LA function, later studies have found that acute changes in LA preload may affect LA reservoir and contractile strains. Acute alterations in blood pressure (BP) induces a change in left ventricular (LV) filling pressure without imposing a volume load, thus providing an opportunity to assess the effects of the change in LA afterload on LA mechanics. This study aims to understand the effect of acute BP changes on LA strain. METHODS: A total of 40 patients admitted to the emergency department with hypertensive urgency were included. All patients underwent a comprehensive echocardiographic examination including measurement of LA reservoir, conduit and contractile strains. A repeat set of measurements were obtained after BP lowering. RESULTS: Average drop in mean BP following intervention was 18.1 ± 5.4%. LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, as well as maximum and minimum LA volumes were decreased significantly after BP reduction. The absolute increases in reservoir and contractile strains were 2.3 ± 4.7% (7.9% ± 13.8% relative to baseline) and 2.5 ± 3.3% (13.5 ± 19.0% relative to baseline), respectively, with both changes being statistically significant (p = 0.003 for reservoir and p < 0.001 for contractile strains). There were no significant changes in conduit strain after BP intervention (p = 0.79). The change in both LA reservoir and contractile strains were more evident in those with a previous diagnosis of hypertension and those with a smaller degree of change in mean BP after intervention. CONCLUSION: In patients with an acute hypertension, lowering BP leads to an acute improvement in LA reservoir and contractile strains. Thus, acute changes in systemic BP should be considered when LA mechanics are evaluated.

Left atrial strain analysis improves left ventricular filling pressures non-invasive estimation in the acute phase of Takotsubo syndrome.

AIMS: The aim of our study is to assess the ability of left atrial (LA) strain values to improve left ventricular and diastolic pressure (LVEDP) non-invasive estimation as compared with traditional echocardiographic indexes in the acute phase of Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) and to predict adverse in-hospital outcomes in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive TTS patients were prospectively enrolled. Left ventricular and diastolic pressure was measured at the time of catheterization. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed within 48 h from hospital admission. In-hospital complications (acute heart failure, death from any cause, and life-threatening arrhythmias) were collected. A total of 62 patients were analysed (72.2 ± 10.1 years, female 80%) and in-hospital complications occurred in 25 (40.3%). Left ventricular and diastolic pressure mean value was 24.53 ± 7.92 mmHg. Left atrial reservoir and pump strain values presented higher correlation with LVEDP (r -0.859, P < 0.001 and r -0.848, P < 0.001, respectively) in comparison with E/e ' ratio, left atrial volume index (LAVi), and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) peak velocity. In addition, at receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, LA reservoir and pump strain resulted to be better predictors of LVEDP above the mean of our population [0.909 (95% CI 0.818-0.999, P < 0.001) and 0.889 (95% CI 0.789-0.988, P < 0.001)], respectively] as compared with E/e' ratio, LAVi, and TR peak velocity.Finally, LA reservoir strain resulted to be an independent predictor of worse in-hospital outcomes, together with LVEDP and left ventricular ejection fraction (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our study, lower LA reservoir and pump strain values were better predictors of LVEDP as compared with traditional echocardiographic indexes in the acute phase of TTS syndrome. Moreover, LA reservoir strain was an independent predictor of adverse in-hospital outcomes.

Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is characterized by obstruction of major pulmonary arteries with organized thrombi. Clinical risk factors for pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease including metabolic syndrome, left-sided valvular heart disease, and ischemic heart disease are common in CTEPH patients. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate prevalence and prognostic implications of elevated left ventricular filling pressures (LVFP) in CTEPH. METHODS: A total of 593 consecutive CTEPH patients undergoing a first diagnostic right and left heart catheterization were included in this study. Mean pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (mPAWP) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were utilized for assessment of LVFP. Two cutoffs were applied to identify patients with elevated LVFP: 1) for the primary analysis mPAWP and/or LVEDP >15 mm Hg, as recommended by the current pulmonary hypertension guidelines; and 2) for the secondary analysis mPAWP and/or LVEDP >11 mm Hg, representing the upper limit of normal. Clinical and echocardiographic features, and long-term mortality were assessed. RESULTS: LVFP was >15 mm Hg in 63 (10.6%) and >11 mm Hg in 222 patients (37.4%). Univariable logistic regression analysis identified age, systemic hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, calcific aortic valve stenosis, mitral regurgitation, and left atrial volume as significant predictors of elevated LVFP. Atrial fibrillation, calcific aortic valve stenosis, mitral regurgitation, and left atrial volume remained independent determinants of LVFP in adjusted analysis. At follow-up, higher LVFPs were measured in patients who had meanwhile undergone pulmonary endarterectomy (P = 0.002). LVFP >15 mm Hg (P = 0.021) and >11 mm Hg (P = 0.006) were both associated with worse long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated LVFP is common, appears to be due to comorbid left heart disease, and predicts prognosis in CTEPH.

Prognostic Implications of Left Atrial Stiffness Index in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: The left atrium (LA) plays an important role in the pathophysiology and disease progression of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the prognostic potential of LA stiffness index in patients who have HFpEF. METHODS: This study retrospectively screened patients with elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (≥16 mm Hg) and preserved ejection fraction (≥50%) between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2019. All patients underwent left heart catheterization to measure left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Among these, 307 patients who had suitable image quality for left peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) measurement were analyzed. The study population was classified into low LA stiffness (n = 178, early diastolic transmitral inflow velocity/mitral annulus early diastolic velocity [E/e']/PALS ≤0.26) and high LA stiffness (n = 129, E/e'/PALS >0.26) according to the best LA stiffness index (E/e'/PALS) cutoff value. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality or hospitalization caused by heart failure during follow-up. RESULTS: LA stiffness index showed good correlations with E/e' (r = 0.737; P < 0.001), LA volume index (r = 0.529; P < 0.001), right ventricular systolic pressure (r = 0.404; P < 0.001), and log N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (r = 0.540; P < 0.001). LA stiffness index demonstrated better predictive performance than echocardiographic diastolic parameters did (P < 0.001). Patients with low LA stiffness had better clinical outcomes than those with high LA stiffness during a median follow-up of 6 years did (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, LA stiffness index was independently associated with increased risk of the composite endpoint of death or heart failure hospitalization (HR: 1.59 [95% CI: 1.01-2.51]; P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Increased LA stiffness was associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality and hospitalization caused by heart failure in patients who have HFpEF, and its prognostic role was more pronounced than that of indexes of left ventricular filling pressure.

Comparison of the prognostic value of lateral versus septal early mitral annulus velocity in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

Mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e') measured using Doppler echocardiography is important for the noninvasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP). However, it remains unknown whether lateral or septal e' is prognostically more reliable. Accordingly, here, we compared the prognostic utility of lateral e' with that of septal e' in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (HF). We retrospectively analyzed the data of 193 consecutive patients with acute decompensated HF. According to the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines, the cut-off values of high lateral e' and septal e' were 10 cm/s and 7 cm/s, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to compare 90-day mortality between groups. For the entire cohort, 90-day mortality was 15.5%. Lateral e' <10 was significantly correlated with higher 90-day mortality (log-rank, P = 0.026), whereas septal e' <7 was not significantly associated with 90-day mortality (log-rank, P = 0.405). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that the best cut-off values for lateral e' and septal e' in this cohort were 10 cm/s and 6 cm/s, respectively. However, septal e' <6 was also not associated with 90-day mortality (log-rank, P = 0.141). This study demonstrated that, when comparing lateral e' with septal e', the former provides better prognostic utility for patients with acute decompensated HF. If a dissociation between lateral e' and septal e' is detected, the value measured at the lateral site may be more credible for determining LVFP in HF.

Unveiling the Hidden Chamber: Exploring the Importance of Left Atrial Function and Filling Pressure in Cardiovascular Health.

The left atrium (LA) is a vital component of the cardiovascular system, playing a crucial role in cardiac function. It acts as a reservoir, conduit, and contractile chamber, contributing to optimal left ventricle (LV) filling and cardiac output. Abnormalities in LA function have been associated with various cardiovascular conditions, including heart failure, atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease, and hypertension. Elevated left ventricular filling pressures resulting from impaired LA function can lead to diastolic dysfunction and increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Understanding the relationship between LA function and LV filling pressures is crucial for comprehending the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases and guiding clinical management strategies. This article provides an overview of the anatomy and physiology of the LA, discusses the role of LA mechanics in maintaining normal cardiac function, highlights the clinical implications of elevated filling pressures, and explores diagnostic methods for assessing LA function and filling pressures. Furthermore, it discusses the prognostic implications and potential therapeutic approaches for managing patients with abnormal LA function and elevated filling pressure. Continued research and clinical focus on left atrial function are necessary to improve diagnostic accuracy, prognostic assessment, and treatment strategies in cardiovascular diseases. It will explore the importance of assessing LA function as a marker of cardiac performance and evaluate its implications for clinical practice. In accordance with rigorous scientific methodology, our search encompassed PubMed database. We selected articles deemed pertinent to our subject matter. Subsequently, we extracted and synthesized the salient contents, capturing the essence of each selected article.

Electrical storm refractory multiple antiarrhythmic medications was stopped by interatrial shunting procedure-A case report.

Electrical storm (ES) remains a major dilemma for clinicians, often presenting as a medical emergency associated with significant adverse outcomes. The mechanisms behind triggering ES are complex. Although the increased activation of the sympathetic nervous system was widely accepted as a major mechanism in initiating and maintaining ES, it's thought that the interaction between mechanical and electrical substrates may play an important role in some situations. Here we present a case of ES that was refractory to multiple antiarrhythmic medications but was stopped by interatrial shunting. We aim to highlight the importance of mechano-electric feedback (MEF) as the pathophysiological mechanisms of some types of ES and the utility of interatrial shunting as an alternative therapeutic strategy for patients with ES initially refractory to antiarrhythmic medications when there is evidence to indicate increased left ventricular filling pressure or left atrial pressure.

Incremental Value of Left Atrial Function Analysis in the Assessment of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background: Left atrial (LA) reservoir strain provides interesting information about left ventricular (LV) filling pressure. However, the advantages of atrial reservoir strain in comparison with conventional parameters in patients with myocardial infarction are not clear yet. Methods: Fifty patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) prospectively underwent echocardiographic assessment of LV systolic and diastolic function by conventional parameters and two-dimensional speckle tracking longitudinal strain of left atrium. LV filling pressure was estimated by brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. Results: Systolic and conventional diastolic parameters did not show significant differences between patients with increased and normal BNP values, whereas LA reservoir strain was reduced (33.1 ± 8% vs. 46.5 ± 9.8%; P = 0.001) in patients with higher BNP levels. LA reservoir strain had higher area under curve value (0.880) than the other parameters in identifying patients with elevated BNP and a cut-off value of 40.5% reached sensitivity and specificity values of 93% and 86% and positive and negative predictive values of 92% and 85%. LA reservoir strain reclassified 23 patients with increased BNP values, which were previously estimated to have normal (16 patients) and undeterminable LA pressure (seven patients) by using the recommended algorithm for diastolic function. Conclusions: LA reservoir strain is a useful tool for the evaluation of diastolic function and seems to be more sensitive than conventional parameters in the detection of subtle increase of LV filling pressure in patients with STEMI. It allows physicians to reclassify patients with undeterminable diastolic function according to conventional algorithm.

Diagnostic Accuracy of the 2016 Guideline-Based Echocardiographic Algorithm to Estimate Invasively-Measured Left Atrial Pressure by Direct Atrial Cannulation.

BACKGROUND: Although estimation of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) using an integrated echocardiographic algorithm is recommended, the usefulness of this algorithm has not been fully validated. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of an algorithmic classification system using invasively measured left atrial pressure (LAP) in a large-scale cohort. METHODS: The authors enrolled 1,967 patients (age 68 ± 10 years) whose LAP was directly measured within the left atrium during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on the echocardiographic algorithm: normal (group N, n = 1,282), undetermined (group U, n = 160), and elevated (group E, n = 346) LAP groups. Invasively measured LAP and echocardiographic parameters estimating LVFP were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The median LAP was 12.6 ± 5.7 mm Hg in the entire cohort. LAP was significantly higher in group E than that in the other groups (groups E vs U vs N, 14.2 ± 6.3 mm Hg vs 13.5 ± 5.9 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 5.5 mm Hg; P < 0.001). Among group E patients, 43.1% had elevated LAP (≥15 mm Hg), whereas 56.9% had normal LAP (<15 mm Hg). Of the patients in group N, 69.0% had normal LAP, whereas 31% had elevated LAP. Although the correlation between invasively measured LAP and E/e', peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity, and left atrial volume index was modest, the number of abnormal values correlated significantly with elevated LAP (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The classification using combined echocardiographic parameters in the recommendations may be useful for detecting patients with normal LVFP but may be limited for detecting elevated LVFP.

Left Ventricular Diastolic Function: Comparison of Slow Coronary Flow Phenomenon and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Disease.

Background An interplay of myocardial structural abnormalities and coronary arterial dysfunction underlies the worsening left ventricular compliance. The conventionally used angina drugs have demonstrated a beneficial effect on both angina and coronary flow in cases with microvascular dysfunction and non-obstructive coronary disease. Despite that, vasoactive therapy only partially affects diastolic function in this patient population. Purpose This retrospective study was planned to evaluate the association of myocardial mass, delayed epicardial coronary flow, and vasoactive drugs with parameters of diastolic function in two cohorts with preserved left ventricular function and non-obstructive coronary disease in patients with slow coronary flow phenomenon (SCFP) and patients with the hypertensive disease and left ventricular hypertrophy. Material and methods The epicardial coronary flow was evaluated in 48 patients with unstable angina in the absence of coronary stenosis >50%, by applying the methods of corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infraction frame count (cTFC). The abnormalities in the left ventricular function were assessed by echocardiography using PW-Doppler of the diastolic mitral inflow and tissue Doppler imaging. Twenty-one (43.8%) patients were diagnosed with SCFP, and twelve patients (25%) had slow epicardial coronary flow, hypertensive disease, and ventricular hypertrophy (SFLVH). The remaining 15 (31.3%) were patients with ventricular hypertrophy, hypertension, and non-delayed epicardial coronary flow (NFLVH). Results The patients with SFLVH showed reduced peak early diastolic lateral mitral annular velocity (e'L) when compared to SCFP (7.1±1.9cm/s vs 8.6±2.1 cm/s, p=0.045) and NFLVH (7.1±1.9 cm/s vs 8.7±1.8 cm/s, p=0.018). A borderline significant difference was observed for the peak early diastolic septal mitral annular velocity (e'S) between the patients with SFLVH and SCFP ( 7.0±1.3 cm/s vs 8.3±2.1 cm/s, p=0.057). The ratio of mitral diastolic inflow velocity to early diastolic velocity of the mitral annulus (E/e') in the SFLVH group was a tendency higher than E/e' of the patients with SCFP (9.8±3.1 vs. 8.2±2.1, p=0.084) and NFLVH (9.8±3.1 vs. 7.8±1.5, p=0.051) .In the group with left ventricular hypertrophy, E/e' >10 was more frequently observed in patients with a marked delay in the epicardial flow (33.1 ± 13.1 frames vs. 25.4 ± 11.8 frames, p=0.011) and higher left ventricular mass (146.9 ± 17.7 g/m2 vs. 126.1 ± 121.5 g/m2, p=0.027). Conclusions Patients with microvascular angina represent a diverse population. The echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular relaxation (e') and end-diastolic pressure (E/e') are abnormally altered in the population with left ventricular hypertrophy compared to SCFP. The delayed epicardial flow further impairs diastolic function in hypertensive patients with hypertrophy and non-obstructive coronary disease.

Cardiac magnetic resonance identifies raised left ventricular filling pressure: prognostic implications.

AIMS: Non-invasive imaging is routinely used to estimate left ventricular (LV) filling pressure (LVFP) in heart failure (HF). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is emerging as an important imaging tool for sub-phenotyping HF. However, currently, LVFP cannot be estimated from CMR. This study sought to investigate (i) if CMR can estimate LVFP in patients with suspected HF and (ii) if CMR-modelled LVFP has prognostic power. METHODS AND RESULTS: Suspected HF patients underwent right heart catheterization (RHC), CMR and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) (validation cohort only) within 24 h of each other. Right heart catheterization measured pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was used as a reference for LVFP. At follow-up, death was considered as the primary endpoint. We enrolled 835 patients (mean age: 65 ± 13 years, 40% male). In the derivation cohort (n = 708, 85%), two CMR metrics were associated with RHC PCWP:LV mass and left atrial volume. When applied to the validation cohort (n = 127, 15%), the correlation coefficient between RHC PCWP and CMR-modelled PCWP was 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.66, P < 0.0001). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-modelled PCWP was superior to TTE in classifying patients as normal or raised filling pressures (76 vs. 25%). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-modelled PCWP was associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio: 1.77, P < 0.001). At Kaplan-Meier analysis, CMR-modelled PCWP was comparable to RHC PCWP (≥15 mmHg) to predict survival at 7-year follow-up (35 vs. 37%, χ2 = 0.41, P = 0.52). CONCLUSION: A physiological CMR model can estimate LVFP in patients with suspected HF. In addition, CMR-modelled LVFP has a prognostic role.

Echocardiographic markers of early alcoholic cardiomyopathy: Six-month longitudinal study in heavy drinking patients.

BACKGROUND: The development of alcoholic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is related to chronic excessive alcohol use. However, features of early-stage ACM are still unclear. We assessed echocardiographic characteristics of patients with alcohol dependence (DSM-IV criteria) during a six-month treatment period. METHODS: Active drinking patients, heavy alcohol users, without heart disease, referred to our Alcohol Addiction Unit were enrolled in the study. After signing informed consent, patients started outpatient treatment program. Echocardiography was performed at enrollment, then three and six months afterwards, by cardiologists blinded to drinking status. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (36 males, 7 females) were enrolled. At six months, 20 patients (46.5%) reduced alcohol consumption below heavy drinking levels. Although within normal range, baseline mean IVS thickness and mean LVDD were significantly higher (p < 0.001) and mean EF significantly reduced (p = 0.009), as compared to age-matched mean references. Mean E/A ratio, DcT and LA diameter were significantly different (p < 0.001) from mean references, but within normal range. Baseline mean E/e' ratio was significantly higher than the mean reference (p < 0.001) and out of the normal range. A significant correlation between the number of drinks per drinking days in the 7 days before baseline assessment and E/e' ratio was observed (p = 0.028). After six months, a trend-level reduction of mean E/e' ratio (p = 0.051) was found in the whole sample; this reduction was statistically significant (p = 0.041) among patients reducing drinking, compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Altered E/e' ratio may characterize early-ACM before the occurrence of relevant echocardiographic alterations. The reduction of alcohol consumption could restore this alteration after six months.

Reduction of Hospitalization and Mortality by Echocardiography-Guided Treatment in Advanced Heart Failure.

In advanced heart failure (AHF) clinical evaluation fails to detect subclinical HF deterioration in outpatient settings. The aim of the study was to determine whether the strategy of intensive outpatient echocardiographic monitoring, followed by treatment modification, reduces mortality and re-hospitalizations at 12 months. Methods: 214 patients with ejection fraction < 30% and >1 hospitalization during the last year underwent clinical evaluation and echocardiography at discharge and were divided into intensive (IMG; N = 143) or standard monitoring group (SMG; N = 71). In IMG, volemic status and left ventricular filling pressure were assessed 14, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days after discharge. HF treatment, particularly diuretic therapy, was temporarily intensified when HF deterioration signs and E/e' > 15 were detected. In SMG, standard outpatient monitoring without obligatory echocardiography at outpatient visits was performed. Results: We observed lower hospitalization (absolute risk reduction [ARR]-0.343, CI-95%: 0.287−0.434, p < 0.05; number needed to treat [NNT]-2.91) and mortality (ARR-0.159, CI 95%: 0.127−0.224, p < 0.05; NNT-6.29) in IMG at 12 months. One-year survival was 88.8% in IMG and 71.8% in SMG (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In AHF, outpatient monitoring of volemic status and intracardiac filling pressures to individualize treatment may potentially reduce hospitalizations and mortality at 12 months follow-up. Echocardiography-guided outpatient therapy is feasible and clinically beneficial, providing evidence for the larger application of this approach.

Interrater reproducibility of the 2016 American society of echocardiography left ventricular diastolic function guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Little data exist regarding interreader variability of diastolic measurements and their application by the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography left ventricular (LV) diastolic function guidelines. METHODS: Volunteers (n = 49) were recruited from an outpatient cardiology practice. The presence and grade of diastology dysfunction (DD) was determined by the 2016 LV diastology guideline algorithm. We determined the mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for each measurement and Fleiss K-statistic to define differences in grading DD. We determined predictors associated with disagreement of DD grade using odds ratios. RESULTS: The mean LVEF was 56%, LAVI 32 ml/m2 , and peak TR velocity was 2.3 m/s. The ICC for mitral inflow and tissue Doppler velocities were >.90, for LV volumes were .80-.86, and for LA volume was .56. The Fleiss K-value for the agreement of the presence of DD was .68 and for DD grade was .59. Variables with increased odds of disagreement were (1) at least one reader considering a TR signal uninterpretable (OR 12.0; 95% CI 1.3-109.6), (2) at least one reader assessing both LVEF 50%-55% and LAVI 29-39 ml/m2 (OR 9.3; 95% CI 1.0-87), and (3) at least one reader assessing LVEF 50-55% (OR 3.8; 95% CI 1.1-13.4). CONCLUSIONS: Using the 2016 ASE/EACVI diastology guidelines, we found excellent interrater reliability of Doppler measurements, moderate-good interrater reliability of volumetric measurements, and moderate-good but not excellent agreement for diastology grade.

Left atrial reservoir strain improves diagnostic accuracy of the 2016 ASE/EACVI diastolic algorithm in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: insights from the KARUM haemodynamic database.

AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the incremental value offered by left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) to the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) diastolic algorithm to identify elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Near-simultaneous echocardiography and right heart catheterization were performed in 210 patients with EF ≥50% in a large, dual-centre study. Elevated filling pressure was defined as invasive pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥15 mmHg. LASr was evaluated using speckle-tracking echocardiography. Diagnostic performance of the ASE/EACVI diastolic algorithm was validated against invasive reference and compared with modified algorithms incorporating LASr. Modest correlation was observed between E/e', E/A ratio, and LA volume index with PCWP (r = 0.46, 0.46, and 0.36, respectively; P < 0.001 for all). Mitral e' and TR peak velocity showed no association. The ASE/EACVI algorithm (89% feasibility, 71% sensitivity, 68% specificity) demonstrated reasonable ability (AUC = 0.69) and 68% accuracy to identify elevated LV filling pressure. LASr displayed strong ability to identify elevated PCWP (AUC = 0.76). Substituting TR peak velocity for LASr in the algorithm (69% sensitivity, 84% specificity) resulted in 91% feasibility, 81% accuracy, and stronger agreement with invasive measurements. Employing LASr as per expert consensus (71% sensitivity, 70% specificity) and adding LASr to conventional parameters (67% sensitivity, 84% specificity) also demonstrated greater feasibility (98% and 90%, respectively) and overall accuracy (70% and 80%, respectively) to estimate elevated PCWP. CONCLUSIONS: LASr improves feasibility and overall accuracy of the ASE/EACVI algorithm to discern elevated filling pressures in patients with preserved EF.