Extrafacial lentigo maligna: A progression model and enhanced diagnostic techniques using dermatoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy.

Lentigo maligna (LM) is a subtype of lentiginous melanoma confined to the epidermis, which is associated with chronic sun exposure. Its clinical, dermatoscopic, and histopathological diagnosis can be challenging, particularly in the early and advanced stages, requiring appropriate clinicopathological correlation. This article reviews the clinical presentation, diagnosis through noninvasive methods (dermoscopy and confocal microscopy), and provides insights for diagnosis of extrafacial LM through the presentation of four representative clinical cases from different phases of a theoretical-practical progression model. Recognizing these lesions is crucial, as once they invade the dermis, they can behave like any other type of melanoma.

Lentigo Maligna Treatment-An Update.

Lentigo maligna (LM) is a melanoma in situ that is prevalent in chronically sun-damaged skin. Characterized by a slow growth pattern and high mutation rates due to chronic UV exposure, LM poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, particularly given its tendency to mimic other skin lesions and its occurrence in cosmetically sensitive areas. Its diagnosis is based on an integrated approach using dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM). Despite its slow progression, LM can evolve into lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM), making its treatment necessary. Treatment modalities encompass both surgical and non-surgical methods. Surgical treatments like Wide Local Excision (WLE) and Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) aim for clear histological margins. WLE, a standard melanoma surgery, faces challenges from LM's subclinical extensions, which increase the recurrence risk. MMS, effective for large or poorly defined lesions, is defined by precise margin control while considering cosmetic outcomes. Non-surgical options, including radiotherapy and imiquimod, are alternatives for non-surgical candidates. Radiotherapy has been effective since the 1950s, offering good control and cosmetic results, especially for older patients. Imiquimod, an immunomodulator, shows promise in treating LM, though its application remains off-label. The increasing incidence of LM/LMM necessitates a balance in treatment choices to minimize recurrence and maintain cosmetic integrity. A multidisciplinary approach, integrating clinical examination with dermoscopy and RCM and histological assessment, is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective LM management.

Risk factors associated with tumor upstaging in melanomas treated with Mohs micrographic surgery with melanocytic immunohistochemistry.

Background: Mohs micrographic surgery with melanocytic immunohistochemistry (MMS-I) is increasingly utilized for special site melanoma treatment. Yet, frequency and risk factors associated with upstaging of all-stage cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS-I remain undefined. Objective: Determine upstaging frequency and factors associated with tumor upstaging for all-stage melanomas treated with MMS-I. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center case series, all cases of invasive and in situ melanoma treated with MMS-I between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. Patient and tumor characteristics were recorded and compared between tumors that were and were not upstaged from their initial T stage. Results: Of the 962 melanoma MMS-I cases identified, 44 (4.6%) were upstaged, including 5.6% of in situ and 2.5% of invasive tumors. Risk factors for upstaging included lack of excisional intent at the time of initial biopsy (P < .01), nonlentigo maligna subtype (P = .03), female sex (P = .02), and initial in situ diagnosis (P = .03). Nonstatistically significant characteristics evaluated included patient age (P = .97), initial Breslow depth (P = .18), and biopsy type (P = .24). Limitations: Retrospective study design. Conclusions: All-stage cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS-I are associated with low upstaging rates. Tumor upstaging is associated with lack of excisional intent, female sex, and in situ tumors.

Double Immunohistochemical Labelling of PRAME and Melan A in Slow Mohs Biopsy Margin Assessment of Lentigo Maligna and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma.

Introduction: Lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) predominantly affect the head and neck areas in elderly patients, presenting as challenging ill-defined pigmented lesions with indistinct borders. Surgical margin determination for complete removal remains intricate due to these characteristics. Morphological examination of surgical margins is the key form of determining successful treatment in LM/LMM and underpin the greater margin control provided through the Slow Mohs micrographic surgery (SMMS) approach. Recent assessments have explored the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers, such as Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME), to aid in LM/LMM and margin evaluation, leveraging the selectivity of PRAME labelling in malignant melanocytic neoplasms. Methods: A Novel double-labelling (DL) method incorporating both PRAME and MelanA IHC was employed to further maximise the clinical applicability of PRAME in the assessment of LM/LMM in SMMS biopsies. The evaluation involved 51 samples, comparing the results of the novel DL with respective single-labelling (SL) IHC slides. Results: The findings demonstrated a significant agreement of 96.1% between the DL method and SL slides across the tested samples. The benchmark PRAME SL exhibited a sensitivity of 91.3% in the SMMS specimens and 67.9% in histologically confirmed positive margins. Discussion: This study highlights the utility of PRAME IHC and by extension PRAME DL as an adjunctive tool in the assessment of melanocytic tumours within staged excision margins in SMMS samples.

Risk factors of lentigo maligna as compared to other melanoma subtypes.

BACKGROUND: Lentigo maligna (LM) exhibits a particular epidemiological profile compared to other histopathologic subtypes of melanoma, with a propensity for the head and neck area and a higher mean age at diagnosis. Few small-scale studies have exclusively evaluated the risk factors for the development of LM. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare LM to other histological subtypes of melanoma for the prevalence of known melanoma risk factors, including pigmentary characteristics, history of occupational sun exposure, nevus count, and familial melanoma history. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of 152 patients with LM and 784 patients with other melanoma subtypes (OM). The Mann-Whitney t-test and Pearson chi-squared test were used to detect differences between the two groups in continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were then constructed to identify risk factors for developing LM compared to other melanoma subtypes. RESULTS: In multivariate logistic regression analysis, LM was positively associated with a lentigines count >50 and occupational sun exposure compared to OM (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.35-3.29 and OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.33-3.57, respectively). In contrast, patients with an increased nevus count and fair or medium skin color were less likely to develop LM than OM (OR 0.93, P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.91-0.94, and OR 0.28, P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.17-0.46, respectively). In univariate analysis, LM exhibited a weaker association with all pigmentary traits than OM. No significant associations were found for atypical nevi count and family history. CONCLUSION: We found significant differences in the prevalence of known melanoma risk factors between LM and other melanoma subtypes, which supports the hypothesis of a distinct pathogenetic pathway of LM.

Real-life practice of reflectance confocal microscopy in France: A prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Studies demonstrating the potential utility of reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) have been performed under experimental conditions. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of RCM practice in real-life. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective study carried out in 10 university dermatology departments in France. RESULTS: Overall, 410 patients were enrolled. One-half of the patients (48%) were referred by private practice dermatologists. They were referred for diagnosis (84.9%) or presurgical mapping (13%). For diagnosis, the lesions were located on the face (62%), arms and legs (14.9%), and trunk (13.6%), and presurgical mapping was almost exclusively on the face (90.9%). Among those referred for diagnosis, the main indication was suspicion of a skin tumor (92.8%). Of these, 50.6% were spared biopsies after RCM. When RCM indicated surgery, histology revealed malignant lesions in 72.7% of cases. The correlation between RCM and histopathology was high, with a correlation rate of 82.76% and a kappa coefficient of 0.73 (0.63; 0.82). LIMITATIONS: This study was performed in the settings of French tertiary referral hospitals. CONCLUSION: This study shows that in real-life RCM can be integrated into the workflow of a public private network, which enables a less invasive diagnostic procedure for patients.

The combination of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy increases the diagnostic confidence of amelanotic/hypomelanotic lentigo maligna.

The dermoscopic diagnosis of amelanotic/hypomelanotic lentigo maligna/lentigo maligna melanoma (AHLM/LMM) may be very difficult in its early stages because of lack of pigment. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is an imaging technique that is especially helpful for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna. To determine the diagnostic performances of dermoscopy and RCM in the diagnosis of AHLM/LMMs we evaluated dermoscopic and RCM images of consecutive cases of histopathologically confirmed AHLM/LMMs, amelanotic/hypomelanotic basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (AHBCCs/AHSCCs), amelanotic/hypomelanotic benign lesions (AHBLs), and actinic keratoses (AKs) from five participating centers. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, predictive values, and level of diagnosis confidence were calculated for both diagnostic procedures. Both dermoscopy and RCM showed diagnostic performance >97% in the diagnosis of AHLM/LMMs versus AHBCC/AHSCCs and their combination slightly improved diagnostic performance, with accuracy increasing from 98.0% to 99.1%. Similarly, RCM in combination with dermoscopy showed a tiny increase in the diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of AHLM/LMMs versus AHBLs (accuracy increased from 87.2% to 88.8%) and versus AKs (accuracy increased from 91.4% to 93.4%). Although the increase in diagnostic performance due to RCM was modest, the combination of dermoscopy and RCM greatly increased the level of confidence; high confidence in the diagnosis of AHLM/LMMs versus AHBLs increased from 36.2% with dermoscopy alone to 76.6% with dermoscopy plus RMC. Based on our results, dermoscopy and RCM should be complementary to improve not only diagnostic accuracy but also the level of diagnostic certainty in the diagnosis of AHLM/LMMs.

Excision margins for melanoma in situ on the head and neck-A single-center 10-year retrospective review of treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although current guidelines recommend a 5 mm surgical margin for the excision of melanoma in situ (MIS), increasing evidence has shown this may be suboptimal to achieve tumor clearance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate margins required for optimal cure rates with excision of MIS on the head and neck and investigate tumor and/or patient factors in those requiring >5 mm margins to achieve tumor clearance. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 846 (807 primary and 39 recurrent) MIS cases on the head and neck treated in the authors' dermatologic surgery department over a 126-month (10.5 year) period. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent were cleared with 5 mm margins. A total of 15 mm margins were required to achieve a 97% clearance rate. Difference in clearance rate between margin thresholds was significant (P < .001). Tumor location on the cheek and larger preoperative size correlated with requiring >5 mm margins to achieve tumor clearance (P = .006 and P = .001, respectively). LIMITATIONS: This is a single-center retrospective study which relies on accurate documentation of clinical data. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that MIS on the head and neck often requires margins >5 mm margins to achieve tumor clearance. When Mohs micrographic surgery is not possible, excision margins of ≥10 mm are likely necessary for head and neck tumors.

Dermoscopy of Lentiginous Melanomas and Equivocal Benign Pigmented Macules of the Scalp: A Case-Control Multicentric Study.

INTRODUCTION: Although the dermoscopic features of facial lentiginous melanomas (LM), including lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma, have been extensively studied, the literature about those located on the scalp is scarce. This study aims to describe the dermoscopic features of scalp LM and assess the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy to discriminate them from equivocal benign pigmented macules. METHODS: Consecutive cases of scalp LM and histopathology-proven benign but clinically equivocal pigmented macules (actinic keratoses, solar lentigos, seborrhoeic keratoses, and lichen planus-like keratoses) from four referral centres were included. Dermoscopic features were analysed by two blinded experts. The diagnostic performance of a predictive model was assessed. RESULTS: 56 LM and 44 controls were included. Multiple features previously described for facial and extrafacial LM were frequently identified in both groups. Expert's sensitivity to diagnose scalp LM was 76.8% (63.6-87.0) and 78.6% (65.6-88.4), with specificity of 54.5% (38.9-69.6) and 56.8% (41.0-71.7), and fair agreement (kappa coefficient 0.248). The strongest independent predictors of malignancy were (OR, 95% CI) chaos of colour (15.43, 1.48-160.3), pigmented reticular lines (14.96, 1.68-132.9), increased density of vascular network (3.45, 1.09-10.92), and perifollicular grey circles (2.89, 0.96-8.67). The predictive model achieved 85.7% (73.8-93.6) sensitivity, 61.4% (45.5-75.6) specificity, and 81.5 (73.0-90.0) area under curve to discriminate benign and malignant lesions. A diagnostic flowchart was proposed, which should improve the diagnostic performance of dermoscopy. CONCLUSION: Both facial and extrafacial dermoscopic patterns can be identified in scalp LM, with considerable overlap with benign pigmented macules, leading to low specificity and interobserver agreement on dermoscopy.

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy needed for lentigo maligna melanoma?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an area of debate in the management of lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM). The utility of SLNB and its prognostic value in LMM have not yet been studied with large databases. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (2012-2020) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (2010-2019) database for patients with cutaneous nonmetastatic LMM with Breslow thickness >1.0 mm. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with SLNB performance and sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity. Univariable and multivariable analyses assessed overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) based on SLNB performance and SLN status. RESULTS: Compared to other melanoma subtypes, LMM had lower rates of SLNB (66.6% vs. 80.0%-84.0%) and SLN positivity (11.3% vs. 18.6%-34.2%). Compared to patients who did not undergo SLNB, SLN status was significantly associated with improved OS in patients with SLN positive (HR = 0.64 [0.55-0.76]) and SLN negative (HR = 0.68 [0.49-0.94]), and worse MSS only in patients with positive SLN (HR = 3.93, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The improved OS associated with SLNB likely implies surgical selection bias. Analysis of MSS confirms appropriate patient selection and suggests important prognostic value associated with SLN status. These results support continued SLNB for LMM patients according to standard guidelines.

Common Skin Cancers in Older Adults Approach to Diagnosis and Management.

Skin cancers are the most common malignancies to affect older adults. The most common skin cancers, basal and squamous cell carcinoma, can usually be cured with surgery. Although less common, melanoma can be deadly when not caught in its earliest stages.

Perifollicular linear projections: A dermatoscopic criterion for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna on the face.

BACKGROUND: Lentigo maligna (LM) can mimic benign, flat, pigmented lesions and can be challenging to diagnose. OBJECTIVE: To describe a new dermatoscopic feature termed "perifollicular linear projections (PLP)" as a diagnostic criterion for LM on the face. METHODS: Retrospective study on reflectance confocal microscopy and dermatoscopy images of flat facial pigmented lesions originating from 2 databases. PLP were defined as short, linear, pigmented projections emanating from hair follicles. Dermatoscopy readers were blinded to the final histopathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: From 83 consecutive LMs, 21/83 (25.3%) displayed "bulging of hair follicles" on reflectance confocal microscopy and 18 of these 21 (85.7%), displayed PLP on dermatoscopy. From a database of 2873 consecutively imaged and biopsied lesions, 252 flat-pigmented facial lesions were included. PLP was seen in 47/76 melanomas (61.8%), compared with 7/176 lesions (3.9%) with other diagnosis (P < .001). The sensitivity was 61.8% (95% CI, 49.9%-72.7%), specificity 96.0% (95% CI, 92.9%-98.4%). PLP was independently associated with LM diagnosis on multivariate analysis (OR 26.1 [95% CI, 9.6%-71.0]). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: PLP is a newly described dermatoscopic criterion that may add specificity and sensitivity to the early diagnosis of LM located on the face. We postulate that PLP constitutes an intermediary step in the LM progression model.

The limited value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in lentigo maligna melanoma: A nomogram based on the results of 29 years of the nationwide dutch pathology registry (PALGA).

BACKGROUND: Lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) predominantly presents in the head and neck of the elderly. The value of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for LMM patients remains to be determined, as the reported average yield of positive lymph nodes is less than 10%. In this nationwide cohort study, we wanted to identify LMM patients with an increased risk of SLNB-positivity. METHODS: LMM with an SLNB indication according to the 8th AJCC melanoma guidelines were retrospectively identified from the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA). A penalized (LASSO) logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the optimal combination of clinicopathological factors to predict a positive SLNB. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 2020, 1989 LMM patients met our inclusion criteria. SLNB was performed in 16.7% (n = 333) and was positive in 7.5% (25/333). The false-negative rate was 21.9%. Clinically detectable regional lymph node (LN) metastases were found in 1.3% (n = 25). Clinicopathological characteristics best predictive for SLNB-positivity (Odds ratio; 95% CI) were age (0.95; 0.91-0.99), ulceration 1.59 (0.44-4.83), T4-stage (1.81; 0.43-6.2), male sex (1.97; 0.79-5.27), (lymph)angioinvasion (5.07; 0.94-23.31), and microsatellites (7.23; 1.56-32.7) (C-statistic 0.75). During follow-up, regional LN recurrences were detected in 4.2% (83/1989) of patients, of which the majority (74/83) had no evidence of regional LN metastases at baseline. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm the limited SLNB-positivity in LMM patients. Based on the identified high-risk clinicopathological features, a nomogram was developed to predict the risk of a positive SLNB.

Topical and Intralesional Immunotherapy for Melanoma In Situ: A Review.

The incidence of in situ melanoma (MIS) has increased over the last decades. The mainstay of treatment for MIS, including lentigo maligna (LM), is complete surgical excision with clear margins (0.5 to 1.0 cm). Nevertheless, MIS lesions often affect elderly patients with comorbidities and involve large lesions in cosmetically sensitive areas, which means surgery is not always appropriate. Non-surgical treatments have a role in these cases, and include radiotherapy, cryosurgery, immunotherapy, laser therapy, and other topical medications. This study aims to review the applications of immunotherapy in MIS, either in monotherapy or in combination with other therapeutic alternatives. The main forms of immunotherapy used are imiquimod and, to a lesser extent, intralesional interferon-α (IL-INF-α) and ingenol mebutate (IM). IL-INF-α and IM have not been studied as extensively as imiquimod, whose results in real-life practice are encouraging. The clearance and recurrence rates reported in MIS treated with imiquimod as monotherapy, or as an adjuvant after surgery with affected or narrow margins, make imiquimod a reliable therapeutic alternative in selected cases. Also, its use as a neoadjuvant therapy before surgery was shown to reduce the final surgical defect size required to confirm negative histologic margins. In conclusion, local immunotherapy is frequently used in clinical practice and experience confirms it to be an excellent option for certain patients.

Dermoscopy of atypical pigmented lesions of the face: Variation according to facial areas.

Atypical pigmented facial lesions (aPFLs)-including lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM), solar lentigo (SL), pigmented actinic keratosis (PAK), atypical nevi (AN), seborrheic keratosis (SK) and lichen planus-like keratosis (LPLK)-can exhibit clinical and dermoscopic overlapping features. We aimed to investigate if and how 14 dermoscopic features suggestive for the aforementioned aPFLs vary according to six facial sites among 1197 aPFLs cases (excised to rule out malignancy) along with lesion and patients' metadata. According to distribution and association analysis, aPFLs on the forehead of a male patient aged > 69 years displaying the obliterated follicular openings pattern, appear to be more at risk of malignancy. Of converse, aPFLs of the orbital/cheek/nose area with evident and regular follicular openings with diameter < 10 mm in a female aged below 68 are probably benign. The obliterated follicular openings, keratin plugs, evident and regular follicular openings and target-like pattern features differed significantly among six facial areas in all aPFLs cases. Lesion of the nose may show both features suggestive of malignancy and benignity (e.g. many SL and PAK may display target-like pattern and some LM/LMM cases display keratin plugs and evident and follicular openings), making these features less specific.

Topical Treatment of Melanoma In Situ, Lentigo Maligna, and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma with Imiquimod Cream: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: The classical management of melanoma is surgery, but this can be challenging because of several factors, such as age, body area, lesion size, among others. Topical imiquimod may be a therapeutic option for the treatment of melanoma in situ and lentigo maligna melanoma due to its efficacy, tolerability, and non-invasiveness. The purpose of this systematic review is to assemble current evidence on the treatment of non-metastatic melanoma with topical imiquimod. METHODS: The PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched as the primary sources using the main search terms "imiquimod" combined with "lentigo maligna" and "melanoma" with the command "AND." Articles were identified, screened, and extracted for relevant data, following the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 87 studies covering 1803 lesions treated with imiquimod cream were identified and included in this sytematic review. Forty-nine studies were case reports, 16 were retrospective analyses, 3 were open label trials, six were case series; one study was a controlled randomized trial, one was a randomized trial, and one was a single-arm phase III trial. Because of the high number of low-evidence studies, the overall risk of bias resulted high. In 55 studies, imiquimod 5% was used in monotherapy as the primary treatment; only in one study was imiquimod 3.75% introduced. In most cases, the topical treatment was applied once daily, with the exception of nine cases where an increased daily dosage was prescribed. The total duration of the treatment regimen was extremely variable and depended on body area and tolerability, with differences among patients of the same study. In six studies, imiquimod was used as neoadjuvant therapy before the surgical excision, and in 11 studies it was used after surgery as complementary or adjuvant therapy. In total, 1133 of the 1803 (62.8%) lesions were reported to be cleared after the treatment, taking into account that not all of the patients completed the treatment. Of these 1133 lesions, histological clearance was achieved in 645 (56.9%) lesions and clinical clearance only was achieved in 490 (43.2%) lesions; relapse occurred in 107 lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneity of the studies included in this systematic review precludes the drawing of any relevant conclusions regarding the application of imiquimod. Its efficacy in melanoma in situ and lentigo maligna melanoma has been demonstrated, but further evidence from controlled studies concerning the modalities is missing.