Prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial on early administration of pulmonary surfactant guided by lung ultrasound scores in very preterm infants: study protocol.

Background: Bedside lung ultrasonography has been widely used in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Lung ultrasound scores (LUS) may predict the need for pulmonary surfactant (PS) application. PS replacement therapy is the key intervention for managing moderate to severe neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS), with early PS administration playing a positive role in improving patient outcomes. Lung ultrasonography aids in the prompt diagnosis of NRDS, while LUS offers a semi-quantitative assessment of lung health. However, the specific methodologies for utilizing LUS in clinical practice remain controversial. This study hypothesizes that, in very preterm infants [<32 weeks gestational age (GA)] exhibiting respiratory distress symptoms, determining PS application through early postnatal LUS combined with clinical indicators, as opposed to relying solely on clinical signs and chest x-rays, can lead to more timely PS administration, reduce mechanical ventilation duration, improve patient outcomes, and lower the occurrence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Methods and design: This is a protocol for a prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial that will be conducted in the NICU of a hospital in China. Eligible participants will include very preterm infants (< 32 weeks GA) exhibiting signs of respiratory distress. Infants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the ultrasound or control group. In the ultrasonography group, the decision regarding PS administration will be based on a combination of lung ultrasonography and clinical manifestations, whereas in the control group, it will be determined solely by clinical signs and chest x-rays. The primary outcome measure will be the mechanical ventilation duration. Statistical analysis will employ independent sample t-tests with a significance level set at α = 0.05 and a power of 80%. The study requires 30 infants per group (in total 60 infants). Results: This study aims to demonstrate that determining PS application based on a combination of LUS and clinical indicators is superior to traditional approaches. Conclusions: This approach may enhance the accuracy of NRDS diagnosis and facilitate early prediction of PS requirements, thereby reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation. The findings of this research may contribute valuable insights into the use of LUS to guide PS administration.

Lung Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Late Sequelae of COVID-19 Pneumonia-A Comparison with Chest Computed Tomography: A Prospective Study.

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic allowed physicians to gain experience in lung ultrasound (LUS) during the acute phase of the disease. However, limited data are available on LUS findings during the recovery phase. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of LUS to assess lung involvement in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. This study prospectively enrolled 72 patients who underwent paired LUS and chest CT scans (112 pairs including follow-up). The most frequent CT findings were ground glass opacities (83.3%), subpleural lines (72.2%), traction bronchiectasis (37.5%), and consolidations (31.9%). LUS revealed irregular pleural lines as a common abnormality initially (56.9%), along with subpleural consolidation >2.5 mm ≤10 mm (26.5%) and B-lines (26.5%). A strong correlation was found between LUS score, calculated by artificial intelligence percentage involvement in ground glass opacities described in CT (r = 0.702, p < 0.05). LUS score was significantly higher in the group with fibrotic changes compared to the non-fibrotic group with a mean value of 19.4 ± 5.7 to 11 ± 6.6, respectively (p < 0.0001). LUS might be considered valuable for examining patients with persistent symptoms after recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia. Abnormalities identified through LUS align with CT scan findings; thus, LUS might potentially reduce the need for frequent chest CT examinations.

Assessment of volume status of pediatric hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Accurate volume status assessment and dry weight achievement are the most challenging goals for a nephrologist. We aimed to evaluate the role of ultrasonographic parameters including lung ultrasound and inferior vena cava (IVC) measurements as practical methods of volume status assessment in children on hemodialysis by comparing them with established techniques, such as clinical evaluation and bioimpedance spectroscopy. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study compared pre- and post-dialysis volume status using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) parameters and clinical data with ultrasonographic lung B-lines and IVC parameters in children on regular hemodialysis. RESULTS: A total 60 children (mean age 9.4 ± 2.8 years) were enrolled. Twenty patients (33.3%) were clinically overloaded to varying degrees (17 patients had mild to moderate signs of fluid overload and 3 patients had moderate to severe signs of fluid overload). All other patients (66.7%) were clinically euvolemic. Sonographic parameters were significantly lower post-dialysis than pre-dialysis, including lung B-line count and IVC diameter. IVC collapsibility index mean was significantly higher post-dialysis than pre-dialysis. There was a significant correlation between the lung B-line count, IVC parameters, and BIS-measured overhydration both before and after hemodialysis. Nine patients had ≥ 8 B-lines post-dialysis, only three of them were hypertensive. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical criteria alone are not specific for determining accurate fluid status in pediatric hemodialysis patients. Lung B-line score, IVC parameters, and BIS may be complementary to each other and to clinical data. Lung B-lines outperform IVC measurements and BIS in subclinical volume overload detection in pediatric hemodialysis patients.

Implementation of lung ultrasonography by general practitioners for lower respiratory tract infections: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of lung ultrasonography (LUS) performed by novice users' general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in primary health care settings. DESIGN: A prospective interventional multicenter study (December 2019-March 2020). SETTINGS AND SUBJECTS: Patients aged >3 months, suspected of having LRTI consulting in three different general practices (GPs) (rural, semirural and urban) in France. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility of LUS by GPs was assessed by (1) the proportion of patients where LUS was not performed, (2) technical breakdowns, (3) interpretability of images by GPs, (4) examination duration and (5) patient perception and acceptability. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were recruited, and GPs performed LUS for 111 (73.5%) patients (LUS group). In 99.1% (n = 110) of cases, GPs indicated that they were able to interpret images. The median [IQR] exam duration was 4 [3-5] minutes. LRTI was diagnosed in 70.3% and 60% of patients in the LUS and no-LUS groups, respectively (p = .43). After LUS, GPs changed their diagnosis from 'other' to 'LRTI' in six cases (+5.4%, p < .001), prescribed antibiotics for five patients (+4.5%, p = .164) and complementary chest imaging for 10 patients (+9%, p < .001). Patient stress was reported in 1.8% of cases, 81.7% of patients declared that they better understood the diagnosis, and 82% of patients thought that the GP diagnosis was more reliable after LUS. CONCLUSIONS: LUS by GPs using handheld devices is a feasible diagnostic tool in primary health care for LRTI symptoms, demonstrating both effectiveness and positive patient reception. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT04602234, 20/10/2020.

The effect of focused lung ultrasonography on antibiotic prescribing in patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections in Danish general practice: study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PLUS-FLUS).

BACKGROUND: The use of antibiotics is a key driver of antimicrobial resistance and is considered a major threat to global health. In Denmark, approximately 75% of antibiotic prescriptions are issued in general practice, with acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) being one of the most common indications. Adults who present to general practice with symptoms of acute LRTI often suffer from self-limiting viral infections. However, some patients have bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), a potential life-threatening infection, that requires immediate antibiotic treatment. Importantly, no single symptom or specific point-of-care test can be used to discriminate the various diagnoses, and diagnostic uncertainty often leads to (over)use of antibiotics. At present, general practitioners (GPs) lack tools to better identify those patients who will benefit from antibiotic treatment. The primary aim of the PLUS-FLUS trial is to determine whether adults who present with symptoms of an acute LRTI in general practice and who have FLUS performed in addition to usual care are treated less frequently with antibiotics than those who only receive usual care. METHODS: Adults (≥ 18 years) presenting to general practice with acute cough (< 21 days) and at least one other symptom of acute LRTI, where the GP suspects a bacterial CAP, will be invited to participate in this pragmatic randomized controlled trial. All participants will receive usual care. Subsequently, participants will be randomized to either the control group (usual care) or to an additional focused lung ultrasonography performed by the GP (+ FLUS). The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with antibiotics prescribed at the index consultation (day 0). Secondary outcomes include comparisons of the clinical course for participants in groups. DISCUSSION: We will examine whether adults who present with symptoms of acute LRTI in general practice, who have FLUS performed in addition to usual care, have antibiotics prescribed less frequently than those given usual care alone. It is highly important that a possible reduction in antibiotic prescriptions does not compromise patients' recovery or clinical course, which we will assess closely. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06210282. Registered on January 17, 2024.

The Comparison of Ultrasound and Tomographic Images of Lung Involvement in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Prospective Observational Study.

Introduction Computed tomography (CT) has a high sensitivity for diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia in critically ill patients, but it has significant limitations. Lung ultrasonography (LUS) is an imaging method increasingly used in intensive care units. Our primary aim is to evaluate the relationship between LUS and CT images by scoring a critically ill patient who was previously diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia and underwent CT, as well as to determine their relationship with the patient's oxygenation. Methods This was a single-center, prospective observational study. The study included COVID-19 patients (positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR) who were admitted to the intensive care unit between June 2020 and December 2020, whose oxygen saturation (SpO2) was below 92%, and who underwent a chest tomography scan within the last 12 hours. CT findings were scored by the radiologist using the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). The intensivist evaluated 12 regions to determine the LUS score. The ratio of the partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood to the inspiratory oxygen concentration (PaO2/FiO2) was used to assess the patient's oxygenation. Results The study included 30 patients and found a weak correlation (ICC = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.25-0.65, p < 0.05) between total scores obtained from LUS and CT scans. The correlation between the total LUS score and oxygenation (r = -0.514, p = 0.004) was stronger than that between the CT score and oxygenation (r = -0.400, p = 0.028). The most common sonographic findings were abnormalities in the pleural line, white lung, and subpleural consolidation. On the other hand, the CT images revealed dense ground-glass opacities and consolidation patterns classified as CO-RADS 5. Conclusion A weak correlation was found between LUS and CT scores in critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Also, as both scores increased, oxygenation was detected to be impaired, and such a correlation is more evident with the LUS score.

Case report: Application of color Doppler sonography for the assessment of pulmonary consolidations in a dog.

A 1,5-year-old male Maltipoo was presented to the emergency service for dyspnea, weakness, and cough. An echocardiographic examination showed evidence of pulmonary hypertension with a McConnell sign. Lung ultrasound, including color Doppler, was performed and identified two distinct populations of lung consolidation. Color Doppler analysis of the first type of consolidation showed the absence of blood flow within regions of the consolidation and flow amputation. These findings were consistent with the "vascular sign" reported in human medicine and prompted consideration of pulmonary thromboembolism as a differential diagnosis. In the second type of consolidation, color Doppler identified blood flow within the pulmonary vessels of the consolidated lung, forming a "branching tree-like" pattern that followed the anatomical course of the pulmonary vasculature. These findings suggested that blood flow was preserved within the pulmonary vasculature of the consolidated lung and prompted consideration of inflammatory causes of pulmonary pathology. On recheck 6 days later, recanalization of the first type of consolidation was identified with color Doppler. The case was followed serially once a month for 5 months with LUS, which showed continued improvement. Based on a positive fecal Baermann test, a final diagnosis of Angiostrongylus vasorum was made. New or Unique information Provided-this is the first report of color Doppler LUS being used to characterize and help differentiate the cause of lung consolidation in dogs.

Evaluation of the Effect of Pressure-Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed Mode vs. Volume-Controlled Ventilation Mode on Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic surgery, which results in less bleeding, less postoperative pain, and better cosmetic results, may affect the lung dynamics via the pneumoperitoneum. After laparoscopic surgery, atelectasis develops. The primary aim of the present study is to demonstrate the effects of two different ventilation modes on the development of atelectasis using lung ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes include the plateau pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and compliance differences between the groups. Materials and Methods: In this study, 62 participants aged 18-75 years undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups: the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) group (group V) or the pressure-controlled-volume guaranteed ventilation (PCV-VG) group (group PV). The lung ultrasound score (LUS) was obtained thrice: prior to induction (T1), upon the patient's initial arrival in the recovery room (T2), and just before departing the recovery unit (T3). The hemodynamic data and mechanical ventilation parameters were recorded at different times intraoperatively. Results: The LUS score was similar between the groups at all the times. The change in the LUS score of the right lower anterior chest was statistically higher in the VCV group than the PCV group. The peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was found to be statistically higher in the V group than the PV group five minutes after induction (T5) (20.84 ± 4.32 p = 0.021). The plateau pressure was found to be higher in the V group than the PV group at all times (after induction (Tind) 17.29 ± 5.53 p = 0.004, (T5) 17.77 ± 4.89 p = 0.001, after pneumoperitoneum (TPP) 19.71 ± 4.28 p = 0.002). Compliance was found to be statistically higher in the PV group than the V group at all times ((Tind) 48.87 ± 15.37 p = 0.011, (T5) 47.94 ± 13.71 p = 0.043, (TPP) 35.65 ± 6.90 p = 0.004). Before and after the pneumoperitoneum, the compliance was determined to be lower in the V group than the PV group, respectively (40.68 ± 13.91 p = 0.043, 30.77 ± 5.73 p = 0.004). Conclusions: LUS score was similar between groups at all times. The PCV-VG mode was superior to the VCV mode in providing optimal ventilatory pressures and maintaining high dynamic compliance in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

Lung ultrasonography derived B-line scores as predictors of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and pulmonary artery wedge pressure.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive assessment of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) in patients with heart diseases is challenging. Lung ultrasonography (LUS) is a promising modality for predicting LVEDP and PAWP. METHODS: Fifty-seven stable ambulatory patients who underwent right and left heart catheterization were included. Following the procedures, LUS was performed in twenty-eight ultrasonographic zones, and the correlation between five different LUS derived B-line scores with LVEDP and PAWP was examined. RESULTS: The B-line index correlated with LVEDP and PAWP, with coefficients of 0.45 (p = 0.006) and 0.30 (p = 0.03), respectively. B-line index showed an AUC of 0.76 for identifying LVEDP > 15 mmHg (p = 0.01) and an AUC of 0.73 for identifying PAWP > 15 mmHg (p = 0.008). Overall, scores performances were similar in predicting LVEDP or PAWP > 15 mmHg. A B-line index ≥ 28 was significantly associated with LVEDP > 15 mmHg (OR: 9.97) and PAWP > 15 mmHg (OR: 6.61), adjusted for age and indication for heart catheterization. CONCLUSIONS: LUS derived B-line scores are moderately correlated with PAWP and LVEDP in patients with heart diseases. A B-line index ≥ 28 can be used to predict elevated LVEDP and PAWP with high specificity.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound versus Chest X-Ray for Determining Lung Expansion Based on Rib Count in High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation.

INTRODUCTION: Chest X-ray (CXR) is the most prevalent method for evaluating lung expansion in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of chest radiography with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in determining lung expansion. METHODS: This prospective study included newborns who required HFOV and were monitored in a neonatal intensive care unit. A single neonatologist assessed lung expansion with CXR and POCUS to measure the costal level of the right hemidiaphragm and compared the results. RESULTS: A neonatologist performed 55 measurements in 28 newborns with a gestational age of 32 (23.2-39.4) weeks, followed by HFOV. The rib counts obtained from anterior chest ultrasonography and posterior CXR showed a statistically high concordance (r = 0.913, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Lung ultrasonography is a reliable method for the evaluation of lung expansion based on rib count in patients with HFOV.

Effects of an open lung extubation strategy compared with a conventional extubation strategy on postoperative pulmonary complications after general anesthesia: a single-centre pilot randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a common cause of morbidity. Postoperative atelectasis is thought to be a significant risk factor in their development. Recent imaging studies suggest that patients' extubation may result in similar postoperative atelectasis regardless of the intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategy used. In this pilot trial, we hypothesized that a study investigating the effects of an open lung extubation strategy compared with a conventional one on PPCs would be feasible. METHODS: We conducted a pilot, single-centre, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Adult patients at moderate to high risk of PPCs and scheduled for elective surgery were eligible. Patients were randomized to an open lung extubation strategy (semirecumbent position, fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2] 50%, pressure support ventilation, unchanged positive end-expiratory pressure) or to a conventional extubation strategy (dorsal decubitus position, FIO2 100%, manual bag ventilation). The primary feasibility outcome was global protocol adherence while the primary exploratory efficacy outcome was PPCs. RESULTS: We randomized 35 patients to the conventional extubation group and 34 to the open lung extubation group. We observed a global protocol adherence of 96% (95% confidence interval, 88 to 99), which was not different between groups. Eight PPCs occurred (two in the conventional extubation group vs six in the open lung extubation group). Less postoperative supplemental oxygen and better lung aeration were observed in the open lung extubation group. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-centre pilot trial, we observed excellent feasibility. A multicentre pilot trial comparing the effect of an open lung extubation strategy with that of a conventional extubation strategy on the occurrence of PPCs is feasible. STUDY REGISTRATION DATE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04993001); registered 6 August 2021.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les complications pulmonaires postopératoires (CPP) sont une cause fréquente de morbidité. L'atélectasie postopératoire est considérée comme un facteur de risque important de CPP. Des études d'imagerie récentes suggèrent que l'extubation des patient·es peut entraîner une atélectasie postopératoire semblable, quelle que soit la stratégie de ventilation mécanique peropératoire utilisée. Dans cet essai pilote, nous avons émis l'hypothèse qu'une étude examinant les effets sur les CPP d'une stratégie d'extubation à poumon ouvert par rapport à une stratégie d'extubation conventionnelle serait réalisable. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude randomisée contrôlée pilote, monocentrique et à double insu. Les patient·es adultes présentant un risque modéré à élevé de CPP et devant bénéficier d'une chirurgie non urgente étaient éligibles. Les patient·es ont été randomisé·es à une prise en charge par une stratégie d'extubation à poumon ouvert (position semi-couchée, fraction d'oxygène inspiré [FIO2] 50 %, ventilation par aide inspiratoire, pression positive télé-expiratoire inchangée) ou à une stratégie d'extubation conventionnelle (décubitus dorsal, FIO2 100 %, ventilation manuelle par masque). Le principal critère de faisabilité était l'adhésion au protocole global, tandis que les CPP constituaient le principal critère d'efficacité exploratoire. RéSULTATS: Nous avons randomisé 35 patient·es dans le groupe d'extubation conventionnelle et 34 dans le groupe d'extubation à poumon ouvert. Nous avons observé une adhésion globale au protocole de 96 % (intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 88 à 99), qui n'était pas différente entre les groupes. Huit CPP sont survenues (deux dans le groupe d'extubation conventionnelle vs six dans le groupe d'extubation à poumon ouvert). Nous avons observé des besoins moins importants en oxygène supplémentaire postopératoire et une meilleure aération pulmonaire dans le groupe extubé à poumon ouvert. CONCLUSION: Dans cet essai pilote monocentrique, nous avons observé une excellente faisabilité. Une étude pilote multicentrique comparant l'effet d'une stratégie d'extubation à poumon ouvert à celui d'une stratégie d'extubation conventionnelle sur la survenue de CPP est réalisable. DATE D'ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04993001); enregistrée le 6 août 2021.

Effect of preterm chorioamnionitis on lung ultrasound score used to guide surfactant replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Lung ultrasound score (LUS) accurately guides surfactant replacement in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome due to surfactant deficiency. However, surfactant deficiency is not the unique pathobiological feature, as there may be relevant lung inflammation, such as in certain cases of clinical chorioamnionitis (CC). We aim to investigate if CC influences LUS and ultrasound-guided surfactant treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective (2017-2022), large, cohort study targeted to recruit a homogeneous population treated with unchanged respiratory care policy and lung ultrasound protocol. Patients with (CC+: 207) and without (CC-: 205) chorioamnionitis were analyzed with propensity score matching and subsequent additional multivariate adjustments. RESULTS: LUS was identical at unmatched and matched comparisons. Consistently, at least one surfactant dose was given in 98 (47.3%) and 83 (40.5%) neonates in the CC+ and CC- matched cohorts, respectively (p = .210). Multiple doses were needed in 28 (13.5%) and 21 (10.2%) neonates in the CC+ and CC- cohorts, respectively (p = .373). Postnatal age at surfactant dosing was also similar. LUS was higher in patients who were diagnosed with neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS) (CC+ cohort: 10.3 (2.9), CC- cohort: 11.4 (2.6)), than in those without NARDS (CC+ cohort: 6.1 (3.7), CC- cohort: 6.2 (3.9); p < .001, for both). Surfactant use was more frequent in neonates with, than in those without NARDS (p < .001). Multivariate adjustments confirmed NARDS as the variable with greater effect size on LUS. CONCLUSIONS: CC does not influence LUS in preterm neonates, unless inflammation is enough severe to trigger NARDS. The occurrence of NARDS is key factor influencing the LUS.

Lung Ultrasonography Is an Acceptable Imaging Modality to Diagnose COVID-19 and Effectively Correlates with HRCT Chest-A Prospective Study.

It has been validated beyond doubt that High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) chest and to some extent chest radiographs have a role in corona virus disease-19 (COVID-19). Much less is known about the role of lung ultrasonography (LUS) in COVID-19. In this paper, our main purpose was to gauge the relationship between LUS and chest HRCT in reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) documented cases of COVID-19, as well as in those with high suspicion of COVID-19 with negative RT-PCR. It was a prospective study carried out at our tertiary care hospital, namely, SKIMS Soura. The total number of patients in this study were 152 (200 patients were selected out of which only 152 had undergone both LUS and chest HRCT). The patients were subjected to both LUS and chest HRCT. The radiologist who performed LUS was blinded to clinical findings and HRCT was evaluated by a radiologist with about a decade of experience. The LUS findings compatible with the disease were subpleural consolidations, B-lines and irregular pleural lines. Findings that were compatible with COVID-19 on chest HRCT were bibasilar, subpleural predominant ground glass opacities, crazy paving and consolidations. COVID-19-positive patients were taken up for chest HRCT for disease severity stratification and were also subjected to LUS. On HRCT chest, the imaging abnormalities compatible with COVID-19 were evident in 110 individuals (72.37%), and on Lung Ultrasound they were observed in 120 individuals (78.95%). Imaging of COVID-19 patients assessed by both LUS and HRCT chest,, showed a positive correlation (p < 0.0001). The study revealed a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 76.62%, a positive predictive value of 78.57% and a negative predictive value of 86.76%. None of the individuals with a diagnosis of COVID-19 on HRCT were missed on LUS. An excellent correlation was derived between the LUS score and CT total severity score (p < 0.0001 with a kappa of 0.431). Similar precision compared with chest HRCT in the detection of chest flaws in COVID-19 patients was obtained on LUS.

Targeted neonatal echocardiography and lung ultrasound in preterm infants with chronic lung disease with and without pulmonary hypertension, screened using a standardized algorithm.

Introduction: Increased recognition of the development of chronic pulmonary hypertension (cPH) in preterm infants with chronic lung disease (CLD) has prompted enhanced monitoring for the identification of different phenotypes. Methods: All newborns consulted for oxygen/respiratory support dependency (CLD assessment) from January 2018 to December 2021 were included. TnECHO and LUS screening for cPH-CLD were performed at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. Cases of cPH related to increased pulmonary blood flow (cPH-IPBF) were referred to Pediatric Cardiology. The objective of the study was to identify all cases of cPH (cPH-CLD/IPBF) in the CLD patients screened and to compare outcomes. Following a standardized algorithm, cPH-CLD patients were treated with diuretics; ultrasounds taken before and after treatment were analyzed. Results: Seventy-two patients with CLD were screened. Twenty-two (30%) had cPH-CLD, and nine (12%) had cPH-IPBF. cPH infants underwent more days of mechanical ventilation, were more likely to have retinopathy of prematurity, and showed increased mortality. The LUS pattern observed in the 72 CLD patients consisted of a thickened pleural line and a B-line interstitial heterogeneous pattern; 29% of patients were found to have lung consolidations. After diuretic therapy, step-down in respiratory support occurred in 59% of neonates with cPH-CLD. A decrease in respiratory rate (RR), right ventricular output (RVO), markers of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and B-line pattern was observed. In tissue Doppler imaging, biventricular diastolic function was found to be modified after diuretics. Conclusions: CLD infants with cPH showed increased morbidity and mortality. In cPH-CLD patients, a decrease in RR and step-down in respiratory support was observed after diuretic treatment. Follow-up ultrasound showed a decrease in RVO, markers of PVR, and B-lines.

Erratum: Necrotizing pneumonia in children: Chest computed tomography vs. lung ultrasound.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.898402.].

Unmet needs and perspectives in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: A critical review.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovitis as the most common clinical manifestation, and interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) represents one of the most common and potentially severe extra-articular features. Our current understanding of the mechanisms and predictors of RA-ILD is limited despite the demonstration that an early identification of progressive fibrosing forms is crucial to provide timely treatment with antifibrotic therapies. While high resolution computed tomography is the gold standard technique for the diagnosis and follow-up of RA-ILD, it has been hypothesized that serum biomarkers (including novel and rare autoantibodies), new imaging techniques such as ultrasound of the lung, or the application of innovative radiologic algorithms may help towards predicting and detecting early forms of diseases. Further, while new treatments are becoming available for idiopathic and connective tissue disease-associated forms of lung fibrosis, the treatment of RA-ILD remains anecdotal and largely unexplored. We are convinced that a better understanding of the mechanisms connecting RA with ILD in a subgroup of patients as well as the creation of adequate diagnostic pathways will be mandatory steps for a more effective management of this clinically challenging entity.

Ultrasonographic Applications in the Thorax.

Rapid developments and increasing technological knowledge have changed perspectives on ultrasonography. Previously, ultrasonography was used to evaluate chest wall pathologies, to distinguish between pleural effusion and consolidation, to evacuate pleural effusion, or to evaluate diaphragm movement. Today, it is also used in a wide range of pleural and parenchymal diseases. Ultrasonography is not just used in the emergency department and the intensive care units, it is also utilized in many clinical branches dealing with the respiratory system-due to its ease of use, fast access, price advantage, non-radiation exposure, higher diagnostic sensitivity, and specificity in many clinical situations-and has become a part of the examination. In this review, we have assessed not just transthoracic ultrasonography but also more focal and targeted sonographic applications, such as the endobronchial ultrasound and esophageal ultrasound.

Evolution of Ultrasound-Assessed Lung Aeration and Gas Exchange in Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Transient Tachypnea of the Neonate.

OBJECTIVE: To use clinical, lung ultrasound, and gas exchange data to clarify the evolution of lung aeration and function in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and transient tachypnea of the neonate (TTN), the most common types of neonatal respiratory failure. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective observational cohort study, lung aeration and function were measured with a semiquantitative lung ultrasound score (LUS) and transcutaneous blood gas measurement performed at 1 hour (time point 0), 6 hours (time point 1), 12 hours (time point 2), 24 hours (time point 3) and 72 hours (time point 4) of life. Endogenous surfactant was estimated using lamellar body count (LBC). LUS, oxygenation index (OI), oxygen saturation index (OSI), and transcutaneous pressure of carbon dioxide (PtcCO2) were the primary outcomes. All results were adjusted for gestational age. RESULTS: Sixty-nine neonates were enrolled in the RDS cohort, and 58 neonates were enrolled in the TTN cohort. LUS improved over time (within-subjects, P < .001) but was worse for the RDS cohort than for the TTN cohort at all time points (between-subjects, P < .001). Oxygenation improved over time (within-subjects, P = .011 for OI, P < .001 for OSI) but was worse for the RDS cohort than for the TTN cohort at all time points (between-subjects, P < .001 for OI and OSI). PtcCO2 improved over time (within-subjects, P < .001) and was similar in the RDS and TTN cohorts at all time points. Results were unchanged after adjustment for gestational age. LBC was associated with RDS (ß = -0.2 [95% CI, -0.004 to -0.0001]; P = .037) and LUS (ß = -3 [95% CI, -5.5 to -0.5]; P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: For the first 72 hours of life, the RDS cohort had worse lung aeration and oxygenation compared with the TTN cohort at all time points. CO2 clearance did not differ between the cohorts, whereas both lung aeration and function improved in the first 72 hours of life.

Lung Ultrasound and High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Suspected COVID-19 Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department: A Comparison.

Objective: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography (LUS) and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), to detect COVID-19. Materials and Methods: This study recruited all patients admitted to the emergency medicine unit, due to a suspected COVID-19 infection, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. These patients also who underwent a standardized LUS examination and a chest HRCT. The signs detected by both LUS and HRCT were reported, as well as the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for LUS and HRCT. Results: This cohort included 159 patients, 101 (63%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. COVID-19 patients showed more often confluent subpleural consolidations and parenchymal consolidations in lower lung regions of LUS. They also had "ground glass" opacities and "crazy paving" on HRCT, while pleural effusion and pulmonary consolidations were more common in non-COVID-19 patients. LUS had a sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI 0.92-0.99) and a specificity of 0.24 (95% CI 0.07-0.5) for COVID-19 lung infections. HRCT abnormalities resulted in a 0.98 sensitivity (95% CI 0.92-0.99) and 0.1 specificity (95% CI 0.04-0.23) for COVID-19 lung infections. Conclusion: In this cohort, LUS proved to be a noninvasive, diagnostic tool with high sensitivity for lung abnormalities that were likewise detected by HRCT. Furthermore, LUS, despite its lower specificity, has a high sensitivity for COVID-19, which could prove to be as effective as HRCT in excluding a COVID-19 lung infection.