Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of rectal cancer nodes after chemoradiotherapy: A single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Accurate nodal restaging is becoming clinically more important in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with the emergence of organ-preserving treatment after a good response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of MRI in identifying negative N status (ypN0 patients) in LARC after nCRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 191 patients with LARC underwent MRI before and 6-8 weeks after nCRT and subsequent total mesorectal excision. Short-axis diameter of mesorectal lymph nodes was evaluated on the high resolution T2-weighted images to compare MRI restaging with histopathology.. RESULTS: 146 and 45 patients had a negative N status (ypN0) and positive N status (ypN + ), respectively. On restaging MRI, the 70 % reduction in size of the largest node was associated with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.818 to predict ypN0 stage, with a sensitivity of 93.3 % and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.4 %. No nodes were observed in 38 pts (37 pts ypN0 and 1 patient ypN + ), with sensitivity and NPV of nodes disappearance for ypN0 stage of 93.3 % and 92.5 % respectively. A 2.2 mm cut-off in short-axis diameter was associated with an AUC of 0.83 for the prediction of ypN0 nodal stage, with sensitivity and NPV of 79,5% and 91.1 % respectively. CONCLUSION: A reduction in size of 70 % of the largest limph-node on MRI at rectal cancer restaging has high sensitivity and NPV for prediction of ypN0 stage after nCRT. The high NPV of node disappearance and of a ≤ 2.2 mm short-axis diameter is confirmed.

Should the Baseline MRI Staging Criteria Differentiate Between Mucinous and Classical Rectal Adenocarcinoma?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare baseline MR imaging features for pre-treatment staging between rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (RMAC) and rectal classical adenocarcinoma (RCAC), and to investigate whether the subtype of mucinous carcinoma influences MRI evaluation criteria and high-risk tumors identifying. METHODS: A total of 306 patients who underwent surgical rectal cancer resection were retrospectively reviewed in the study. MR imaging parameters of the primary tumor and lymph nodes (LNs) were compared between two subtypes. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to test significant associations between LN imaging parameters and malignant LN status in RMAC and RCAC, respectively. RESULTS: The length of mucinous tumors was larger than RCAC tumors in pT3 and pT4 stage. For pN0 patients, the long and short diameters of the largest LN on MRI were more likely to be larger in RCAC than RMAC. For pN+ patients, the proportion of LNs exhibiting internal heterogeneity in RMAC was obviously greater than that in RCAC. The best cut-off value of the largest short diameter of malignant LNs was 6.05 mm for RMAC and 8.05 mm for RCAC. And the highest AUC for predicting LNs metastases based on the largest short diameter was 0.794 for RMAC using 6 mm size cut-off, and 0.667 for RCAC using 8 mm cut-off. CONCLUSION: The imaging features that were associated with LN metastases were different between RMAC and RCAC, and different size criteria of LNs was suggested to distinguish high-risk tumors. Clinicians should stay vigilant of LN status and take histologic subtypes into consideration before assigning clinical strategies.

Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in staging early and locally advanced rectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the standard pretreatment staging in patients with rectal cancer. Accurate tumor staging is paramount to determining the appropriate treatment course for patients diagnosed with rectal cancer. The current study aims to re-evaluate the accuracy of pre-operative MRI in staging of both early and locally advanced rectal cancer following completion of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) compared to the pathologic stage. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated for rectal cancer between 2015 and 2020 at a single academic institution. All patients underwent rectal cancer protocol MRIs before surgical resection. Analysis was carried out in two groups: early rectal cancer: T1/2 N0 tumors with upfront surgical resection (N = 40); and locally advanced disease: T3 or greater or N+ disease receiving NAT, with restaging MRI following NAT (n = 63). RESULTS: 103 patients were included in analysis. MRI accuracy in early tumors was 35% ICC = 0.52 (95% CI 0.25-0.71) T stage and 66% ICC = 0 (95% CI -0.24, 0.29) for 29 patients with nodal data for N stage. There was 28% understaging of T2 tumors and 34% understaging of N0 stage by MRI. Post NAT MRI had 44% accuracy ICC = 0.57 (95% CI -0.15-0.20) T stage and 60% accuracy ICC = 0.32 (95% CI 0.08-0.52) N stage. Tumor invasion was overstaged on MRI: 40% T2, 29% T3, 90% T4. Nodal inaccuracy was due to overstaging, 61% N1, 90% N2. CONCLUSIONS: In locally advanced rectal cancer MRI overstaged tumors, this could be due to the continued effect of NAT from MRI to resection. This overstaging is of little clinical significance as it doesn't alter the treatment plan, except in cases of complete clinical response. In early rectal cancer, MRI had limited accuracy compared to pathology, understaging a quarter of patients who would benefit from NAT before surgery. Other adjunct imaging modalities should be considered to improve accuracy in staging early rectal cancer and consideration of complete response and enrollment in watch and wait protocols.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Pre-Operative Staging of Cervical Cancer Patients Who Underwent Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Clinical-Surgical-Pathologic Comparison.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proven to ensure high diagnostic accuracy in the identification of vaginal, parametrial, and lymph node involvement in patients affected by cervical cancer (CC), thus playing a crucial role in the preoperative staging of the disease. This study aims to compare the accuracy of MRI for the preoperative staging of patients with CC who underwent neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) or direct surgery. Retrospective data analysis of 126 patients with primary CC International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB3-IIB who underwent NAT before radical surgery (NAT group = 94) or received surgical treatment alone (control arm = 32) was prospectively performed. All enrolled patients were clinically assessed with both a pelvic examination and MRI before surgical treatment. Data from the clinical examination were compared with the histopathological findings to assess the accuracy of MRI for staging purposes after NAT or before direct surgery. MRI showed an overall accuracy of 46.1%, proving it to be not superior to pelvic and physical examination. The overall MRI accuracy for the evaluation of parametrial, vaginal, and lymph node status was 65.8%, 79.4%, and 79.4%, respectively. In the NAT group, the accuracy for the detection of parametrial, lymph node, and vaginal involvement was lower than the control group; however, the difference was not significant (p ≥ 0.05). The overall accuracy of MRI for the preoperative staging of CC after NAT is shown to be not unsatisfactory. The limits of MRI staging are especially evident when dealing with pre-treated patients.

Whole-Body Integrated [68Ga]PSMA-11-PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Comparison with Whole-Body PET/CT as the Standard of Reference.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection rate of [68Ga]prostate-specific membrane antigen ([68Ga]PSMA-11) positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to compare it with [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/X-ray computed tomography (CT) in patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PC) after radical prostatectomy. PROCEDURES: A total of 93 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer underwent [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT and subsequently a whole-body integrated PET/MRI examination. Board certified nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists evaluated PET/CT and PET/MRI datasets regarding identification of tumor lesions ((i) lymph nodes, (ii) bone lesions, (iii) local recurrence, and (iv) parenchymal lesions) based on maximum [68Ga]PSMA-11 uptake as well as morphological changes. Quality of PET images for both PET/CT and PET/MRI were rated using a 5-point scoring system by evaluating lesion homogeneity, contrast, contour, and delineation. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to determine statistical differences. RESULTS: PC relapse was detected in 62/93 patients. PET/MRI detected 148 out of 150 lesions described in PET/CT. In addition, PET/MRI detected 11 lesions not detected in PET/CT (5 lymph nodes, 6 local recurrences). The exact McNemar statistical test (one-sided) showed significant difference between PET/CT and PET/MRI for diagnosis of local recurrence (p value = 0.031). Diagnostic confidence for (iii) was higher in PET/MRI compared with PET/CT (PET/CT = 1.1; PET/MRI = 4.9). Diagnostic confidence for (i) (PET/CT = 4.9; PET/MRI = 4.6), (ii) (PET/CT = 4.9; PET/MRI = 4.6), and (iv) (PET/CT = 4.6; PET/MRI = 4.8) was equivalent between PET/MRI and PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/MRI provides a similarly high diagnostic performance for localization of recurrent PC as PET/CT. For the detection of local recurrences [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/MRI is superior compared with [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT.

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in organ-preserving strategies for the management of patients with rectal cancer.

Total mesorectal excision has been the most effective treatment strategy adopted to reduce local recurrence rates among patients with rectal cancer. The morbidity associated with this radical surgical procedure led surgeons to challenge the standard therapy particularly when dealing with superficial lesions or good responders after neoadjuvant radiotherapy, to which radical surgery may be considered overtreatment. In this subset of patients, less invasive procedures in an organ-preserving strategy may result in good oncological and functional outcomes. In order to tailor the most appropriate treatment option, accurate baseline staging and reassessment of tumor response are relevant. MRI is the most robust tool for the precise selection of patients that are candidates for organ preservation; therefore, radiologists must be familiar with the criteria used to guide the management of these patients. The purpose of this article is to review the relevant features that radiologists should know in order to provide valuable information during the multidisciplinary discussion and ultimate management decision.

Adhesive capsulitis: MRI correlation with clinical stages and proposal of MRI staging.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to correlate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of adhesive capsulitis with clinical stages and thereby propose a MR staging system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study consisted of 74 patients with clinically diagnosed adhesive capsulitis. The edema of the inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL), pericapsular edema, thickness of anterior band of IGHL, axillary pouch, thickness of coracohumeral ligament, and obliteration of fat in the subcoracoid triangle were evaluated by MRI. RESULTS: Thickening of the anterior band of IGHL showed most significant correlation with the clinical stages. The distribution of edema of IGHL and pericapsular edema also showed significant correlation with the clinical stages of adhesive capsulitis. Pericapsular edema and IGHL edema was not observed in stage IV. CONCLUSION: MR is a useful tool for evaluation and prediction of clinical stage of adhesive capsulitis.

Tumor stage in patients operated for rectal cancer: a comparison of the pre-operative MR and the resection specimen, with specific attention to the effect of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Evaluate the preoperative TN stage with MR and the postoperative stage with histology. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer (2002-2015) and a pre-operative MR were included. A chart review was done. Pathology reports were evaluated for the post-operative tumor stage. Down staging was defined as a lower disease stage in the resection specimen compared with the pre-operative MR. Upgrading ("progression") was defined as a higher disease stage in the resection specimen. The study was approved by ethical committee of the Zaans Medisch Centrum. RESULTS: From 176 out of 231 operated patients a pre-operative MR was available for evaluation. 142 patients (80.7%) underwent neo-adjuvant treatment; the remainder 19.3% underwent immediate surgery. Neo-adjuvant therapy resulted in significant down staging. However, almost 14% of patients had a higher TN stage as determined by the pre-operative MR. In patients who underwent immediate surgery the percentage with "progression" was 30%. The number of patients with stage 1 and 2 were higher in the group not treated with neo-adjuvant therapy. There was no significant difference in tumor stage as determined by histological examination of the resection specimen. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of the MR is not perfect. Underestimation as well as overestimation of the tumor occurred both in the patients treated with radiotherapy as well as those who underwent immediate operation. As such, MR results should be interpreted with caution when devising a treatment strategy.

Histopathological and radiological reporting in rectal cancer: concepts and controversies, facts and fantasies.

In rectal cancer patients, the stage of the disease, local spread and distant metastases status drive the treatment decisions to be made. Histopathology remains the gold standard, but preoperative staging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is pivotal for defining surgical planes and finding patients who could potentially benefit from preoperative regimes. Unfortunately, due to a lack of awareness, expertise and practise the quality of rectal cancer MRI and histopathology reporting varies among centres. This paper highlights the most important and frequently occurring radiological and histopathological discrepancies/mistakes to be aware of.

The localisation of cancer in the sigmoid, rectum or rectosigmoid junction using endoscopy or radiology-What is the most accurate method?

INTRODUCTION: There is a difference in approach between colon and rectal cancer. AIM: EVALUATE THE METHODS OF LOCALISATION: endoscopy and radiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with cancer in the sigmoid or rectum diagnosed with endoscopy, were included. Patients underwent additional radiological examinations. The resection specimen served as the gold standard. A tumour surrounded by serosa was considered a sigmoid cancer, surrounded by perirectal fat, than it was rectal cancer. If the frontal edge of the tumour showed serosa and the dorsal plane perirectal fat than the tumour was located in the "rectosigmoid". RESULTS: A total of 182 cancers were diagnosed. Of the 128 cancers with gold standard, endoscopy had the correct localisation in 112 (87.5%), and radiology in 114 (90.5%) cases. Concordance between both techniques was present in 80%. In 28 cases there was discordance. Radiology located 10 sigmoidal cancers wrongly in the rectum. One rectal cancer was placed in the sigmoid. In 16 cases the endoscopic localisation wrongly was the sigmoid. Sensitivity and specificity for endoscopy in sigmoidal cancer is 100% and 77% respectively, for rectal cancer 77% and 100%. Sensitivity of radiology for cancer in the sigmoid and rectum are 80% and 98% respectively. Specificity for both cancers is 98% and 80% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopist and the radiologist should not be too overconfident with localisation of the tumour in cases of high rectal or low sigmoidal cancer.

The value of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) staging in radiotherapy of early prostate carcinoma / 中国癌症杂志

Background and purpose:Radiotherapy is the common method for treatment of prostate carcinoma,but some patients cannot tolerate the side effects caused by conventional pelvic radiation.MRI can display clearly the disease in the prostate and surrounding tissue.Modified pelvic radiation directed by MRI staging system can reduce the adverse reaction.This study was to evaluate the value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) Staging(TNM staging system) in radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma.Methods:From 1998 to 2003 Sixty-three patients with prostate carcinoma who were confirmed as stage T_(1-2)N_(0)M_(0) by MRI staging system were randomly allocated into two arms: 29 patients in arm A were treated with conventional pelvic radiation(D_(T)4000-4500cGy),and 34 patients in arm B received modified pelvic radiation(D_(T)4000-4500cGy),then 2500-3000cGy were added by conformal radiation therapy.Results:After median follow-up of 61 months,the median survival time was 82 months for conventional pelvic radiation group compared with 76.3 months for modified pelvic radiation group(P=0.673);5-year overall survival rates were 83.97% and 79.64% for conventional pelvic radiation group and modified pelvic radiation group,respectively.The median PSA failure-free survival time for two arms was similar,59 month(conventional pelvic radiation group) versus 60 months(modified pelvic radiation group)(P=(0.859));5-year PSA failure-free survival rates were 42.37% for conventional pelvic radiation group and 49.01% for modified pelvic radiation group,respectively.The morbidity such as acute/chronic gastrointestinal and genitourinary side effects were higher in conventional pelvic radiation group than in modified pelvic radiation group.Conclusions:The local control rates and survival rates for patients with staging T_(1-2)N_(0)M_(0) prostate carcinoma who received modified radiotherapy or conventional radiotherapy were similar,but the toxicities of modified radiotherapy were significantly less than that of conventional radiotherapy.