Effect of the prism and Maddox rod test as the surgical target for type III acute acquired comitant esotropia.

Introduction: This study aims to explore more accurate and efficient examination methods to provide precise target surgical measurements for patients with type III acute acquired comitant esotropia (AACE). Methods: The study conducted a retrospective analysis of 108 patients diagnosed with AACE who received surgical treatment at the Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, from January 2018 to September 2023. All patients underwent examinations of the deviation angle, including the Hirschberg test, prism and Maddox rod test (PMT), and prism and alternate cover test (PACT). For the PACT, the minimum value (PACTmin) and maximum value (PACTmax) were obtained based on differences in examination methods, as well as the deviation angle range (PACT range), which represents the difference between PACTmax and PACTmin. Postoperatively, these patients were followed up for at least 6 months to assess changes in eye position and whether diplopia symptoms recurred. Results: In both near and distant examinations, the results of PACTmax were significantly greater than those of PACTmin (p < 0.001), while the deviation angles obtained from PACTmax and PMT showed no significant statistical difference [p = 0.689 (33 cm), p = 0.436 (5 m)]. There was a strong linear correlation between PACTmin and PMT at both near (R = 0.8887) and distant (R = 0.8950) distances, but each PACTmin corresponded to multiple PMT values. There was no significant difference between the results of PACT range at near and distant distances (p = 0.531). The deviation angles obtained by PMT and PACTmin significantly decreased postoperatively compared to preoperative values, and diplopia disappeared in all patients, with alternative cover test showing no movement or presenting as an esophoria state. Conclusion: The PMT can provide precise target surgical measurements for type III AACE, making it a fast, effective, and cost-efficient examination method. It is worthy of being promoted and applied in clinical practice.

A simple marking system for accurate intraoperative monitoring and adjustment of cyclotorsion strabismus surgery.

Ocular cyclotorsion is treatable only with surgery. The surgical procedure must be tailored individually to the specific etiologies causing the horizontal and vertical strabismus and its torsional components. An adjustable surgical approach is often used for postoperative or intraoperative adjustments. However, the methods currently used have some limitations. In this study, we propose a simple intraoperative marking system for all cyclotorsion correction surgery. The proposed marking system used three sets of surface markers: external horizontal markings, ocular horizontal markings, and surgical torsion markings, drawn in sequence. We retrospectively analyzed the surgical results using this novel marking system in this single-center, single-surgeon study. Fifteen patients with cyclotorsion who underwent treatment using the proposed marking system as an intraoperative aid between August 2019 and August 2021 were included. The medical charts were thoroughly reviewed, and the pre-and postoperative subjective and objective cyclotorsion were analyzed. Among the study subjects (10 males, 5 females; age range: 6-89 years), 13 had excyclotorsion and 2 incyclotorsion. Preoperative mean net subjective cyclotorsion measured by the double Maddox rod (DMR) test was 6.0° (standard deviation: 10.8°) and mean net disc-to-fovea angle (DFA) was 20.23° (13.21°). The postoperative net DMR and DFA were 0.2° (2.1°) and 14.09° (5.97°), respectively. The mean absolute net DMR and DFA being treated were 9.8° (4.8°) and 9.76° (4.61°). Overall, the proposed intraoperative marking system is a simple and quantitative method to assess, monitor, and adjust the torsional aspect for all strabismus surgeries.

Clinical measurements of normative subjective cyclotorsion and cyclofusion in a healthy adult population.

PURPOSE: To investigate normative subjective cyclotorsion values and cyclofusion ranges in a healthy adult population. METHODS: A cross-sectional investigation was performed in 120 healthy, non-strabismic adults, 60 men and 60 women in the age range of 18-69 years. All subjects were assessed for cyclotorsion using the synoptophore and the single Maddox rod (SMR) methods. Cyclofusion was investigated with the synoptophore in 60 of the subjects. RESULTS: All age groups showed low values of subjective torsion, mainly excyclotorsion with mean values of -1 degree for both methods. Reference ranges of cyclotorsion were between -0.7 and -1.5 degrees for the SMR method and between -0.7 and -1.4 degrees using the synoptophore method. There were no significant differences between gender (p = 0.48), but the effect of age was significant for both methods (p = 0.026) demonstrating a slight increase in excyclotorsion with age. Cyclofusion showed a total mean amplitude of 16 degrees, the fusion range was +7 degrees of incyclotorsion to -9 degrees of excyclotorsion. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective reference ranges for cyclotorsion and cyclofusion reveal that low values of torsion are to be expected upon clinical investigation in non-strabismic adult individuals. Values outside of the reference range may be indicators of possible binocular abnormalities or physiological variations. The cyclotorsional measurements and prevalence in this adult population group can be regarded as normative data in clinical settings.

Cyclotorsion Measured in a Patient Population Using Three Different Methods: A Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: To establish if cyclotorsion measurements obtained in a patient population using different methods of testing give equivalent results, and if the results from each test are repeatable over time. METHODS: Twenty referrals, from the orthoptic waiting list at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden, with vertical deviation stated as the primary reason for referral, were examined. Subjective cyclotorsion measurements using three different methods were performed. The methods included two standard tests: a synoptophore, with slides A17a/18a, the single Maddox rod test (SMR), and a new test method: the KMScreen method. Measurements were repeated 3 times for fixing either eye, and on two separate test occasions, for repeatability within each of the methods. RESULTS: During the first test measurements, 11 (55%) showed excyclotorsion measured with the synoptophore method, 18 (90%) with the SMR test, and 15 (75%) with the KMScreen method. During the second set of measurements, 11 (55%) showed excyclotorsion with the synoptophore method, 17 (85%) with the SMR test, and 10 (50%) with the KMScreen test. Median perceived torsional measurements at the first visit for the synoptophore, SMR, and KMScreen tests were -1°, -5°, and -1°, respectively. There were significant differences between the synoptophore and SMR (P=0.025), and the SMR and KMScreen (P=0.025), but not between the synoptophore and KMScreen (P=0.90) methods on measuring the affected eye. All three tests showed repeatable values. The 95% limits of agreement (LoAs) between visits, defined as mean torsional difference ± 1.96 SD of difference, for the synoptophore, SMR, and KMScreen methods were -0.5° ± 4.5°, -0.3° ± 5°, and -0.7° ± 3.5°, respectively. P values for differences between visits were P=0.45, P=0.75, and P=0.90, respectively, using an exact permutation test. CONCLUSION: In this small study group, the three different methods used for testing cyclotorsion showed significantly different results. However, all methods showed significant repeatability (test-retest reliability) over time. This finding is of clinical importance when investigating cyclotorsion in patients. Clinicians need to be aware of the differences between methods when monitoring recovery or changes in patients, and in particular when planning surgical correction for cyclotorsion.

Comparison of Double Maddox Rod Test and Bagolini Striated Lens Test for Superior Oblique Palsy

PURPOSE: We compared the results of the double Maddox rod test (DMRT), which is commonly performed in clinics as a subjective torsion test for superior oblique muscle palsy, with those of the Bagolini striated lenses test (BSLT) in a least dissociating condition to predict the cyclofusional capacity. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with acquired superior oblique muscle palsy were tested for degree of subjective torsion with DMRT and BSLT in primary position and down-gaze in Daegu Catholic University Hospital from May 2014 to March 2015. DMRT was performed in a dark room and BSLT in a lighted room. RESULTS: Mean extorsional degree in primary position was 3.40 ± 2.58° on DMRT and 1.88 ± 2.92° on BSLT, a significant difference (p = 0.000). In down-gaze, mean extorsional degree was 4.16 ± 2.90° with DMRT and 2.40 ± 2.90° with BSLT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The subjective torsional measurement with BSLT was significantly smaller than with DMRT, and the cyclofusional capacity in patients with acquired superior oblique palsy was 1.5° in primary position and 1.8° in down-gaze. BSLT is helpful in addition to DMRT and fundus photograph for the evaluation of cyclotropia in patients with superior oblique muscle palsy, and this test may yield clinically important information for predicting the cyclofusional capacity of patients with superior oblique muscle palsy.

Unmasking Bilateral Inferior Rectus Restriction in Thyroid Eye Disease: Using Degree of Cyclotropia.

PURPOSE: Thyroid eye disease (TED) frequently causes strabismus and diplopia. Though the condition involves multiple extraocular muscles in both eyes, the inferior rectus (IR) muscle is particularly susceptible. TED may be so asymmetric as to mask the involvement of the contralateral IR. The purpose of this study was to determine if the degree of preoperative cyclotropia measured with an objective test could be used to predict the extent of bilateral IR disease and assist in surgical planning. METHODS: Adults with TED involving the IR and demonstrating cyclotropia were enrolled. Preoperative and postoperative sensorimotor exam included quantification of cyclotropia using double Maddox rod test (DMR). Forced ductions were done intraoperatively. Degree of cyclotropia was compared to results of duction tests and surgical outcome. RESULTS: Twelve participating patients demonstrated excyclotropia on DMR test preoperatively (mean 16±9°). Unilateral IR recession was planned based on the results of preoperative ocular rotations and forced duction testing in eight cases. The remaining four underwent bilateral IR recession. Four of the unilateral recession cases presented with reversal of the hypotropia, obvious limitation of elevation in the unoperated eye, and persistent symptomatic excyclotropia at the first postoperative visit. The mean excyclotropia of the bilateral cases was 21±5°, compared to 5.5±3° in the unilateral group (P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Prism diopters of hypotropia, limitation of elevation, and forced duction testing evaluate muscle function relative to its yoke and may underestimate contralateral IR involvement in the case of asymmetrical disease. Duction testing and forced ductions are qualitative and subjective. Results suggest that degree of excyclotropia correlates well with severity of IR restriction, and that amounts exceeding 15° infer bilateral IR involvement.

Accuracy of double Maddox rod with induced hypertropia in normal subjects.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The double Maddox rod is a commonly used instrument to test for cyclotorsion in the clinical setting. This paper assesses the ability of patients without torsional complaint to accurately demonstrate torsional status with varying degrees of induced hypertropia as tested by double Maddox rod. METHODS: Thirty-seven orthophoric subjects underwent double Maddox rod testing with vertical prism of 3(Δ), 10(Δ), 16(Δ), 20(Δ), and 30(Δ). Subjective torsion was recorded for each prism diopter. RESULTS: Mean subjective torsion was recorded as 0.95°, 1.6°, 1.9°, 2.1°, and 2.2° for 3(Δ), 10(Δ), 16(Δ), 20(Δ), and 30(Δ), respectively. Torsion increased in a logarithmic manner as modeled by R™ software version 2.15.2. CONCLUSIONS: The double Maddox rod test as commonly used in clinical practice is both subjective and prone to administrator and subject error. Subjects have more difficulty properly aligning the double Maddox rod as distance between images is increased. It is also possible that recruitment of the oblique muscles during attempted vertical fusion leads to subjective torsion during double Maddox rod testing in otherwise normal participants.

Surgical Results of Modified Harada-Ito Operation for Excyclotorsion

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of the modified Harada-Ito operation for excyclotorsion in acquired superior oblique palsy patients after trauma. METHODS: This study represents a retrospective review of 10 eyes in 9 patients who were surgically treated for excyclotorsion. Cyclotorsion was measured with the double maddox-rod test and fundus photographies preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: The median measured change in excyclotorsion before and after the surgery in the primary gaze was reduced from 15.67 +/- 6.00 to 4.78 +/- 3.42 according to fundus photographies and from 12.30 +/- 6.27 to 2.45 +/- 3.73 according to the double maddox-rod test. Subjective and objective changes in excyclotorsion werer not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The Modified Harada-Ito operation is an effective treatment for correcting excyclotorsion. Although not statistically significant, the amount of excyclotorsion on fundus photography is exaggerated. This point should be considered to achieve effective surgery.

Factores que generan variabilidaden la medida del A/CA / Factors that generate variability in the measurement of the a/ca

El A/CA es la sinergia existente entre la acomodación y la convergencia. Tiene una importante aplicación clínica, por lo que la medición lo más fiable posible de esta relación es de gran importancia. Los diferentesmétodos para medir la heteroforia (Cover Test, Von Graefe, Varilla de Maddox, Thorington) tienen diferentes grados de repetitividad, y los diferentes lentes estímulo generan unas respuestas acomodativasdiferentes, por lo que el empleo de una técnica lo más repetible para medir la foria y estímulos que generenmayor estabilidad de la acomodación son los recomendables para la evaluación del A/CA.

Relationship between Accommodative Convergenceand Convergence is namely AC/A ratio. It´s very important in clinic routine so it has to be measured pretty carefully. Different methods to get the heterophoriahave diverse repeatability, because that we should use a technique which most reliability and wear stimulus lens that yield more stability in the accommodative response.