Radiomics analysis combining gray-scale ultrasound and mammography for differentiating breast adenosis from invasive ductal carcinoma.

Objectives: To explore the utility of gray-scale ultrasound (GSUS) and mammography (MG) for radiomic analysis in distinguishing between breast adenosis and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Methods: Data from 147 female patients with pathologically confirmed breast lesions (breast adenosis: 61 patients; IDC: 86 patients) between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected. A training cohort of 113 patients (breast adenosis: 50 patients; IDC: 63 patients) diagnosed from January 2018 to December 2021 and a time-independent test cohort of 34 patients (breast adenosis: 11 patients; IDC: 23 patients) diagnosed from January 2022 to December 2022 were included. Radiomic features of lesions were extracted from MG and GSUS images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was applied to select the most discriminant features, followed by logistic regression (LR) to construct clinical and radiomic models, as well as a combined model merging radiomic and clinical features. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: In the training cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) for radiomic models based on MG features, GSUS features, and their combination were 0.974, 0.936, and 0.991, respectively. In the test cohort, the AUCs were 0.885, 0.876, and 0.949, respectively. The combined model, incorporating clinical and all radiomic features, and the MG plus GSUS radiomics model were found to exhibit significantly higher AUCs than the clinical model in both the training cohort and test cohort (p<0.05). No significant differences were observed between the combined model and the MG plus GSUS radiomics model in the training cohort and test cohort (p>0.05). Conclusion: The effectiveness of radiomic features derived from GSUS and MG in distinguishing between breast adenosis and IDC is demonstrated. Superior discriminatory efficacy is shown by the combined model, integrating both modalities.

An investigation of tomosynthesis on the diagnostic efficacy of spot compression mammography.

To explore the diagnostic efficacy of tomosynthesis spot compression (TSC) compared with conventional spot compression (CSC) for ambiguous findings on full-field digital mammography (FFDM). In this retrospective study, 122 patients (including 108 patients with dense breasts) with ambiguous FFDM findings were imaged with both CSC and TSC. Two radiologists independently reviewed the images and evaluated lesions using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Pathology or at least a 1-year follow-up imaging was used as the reference standard. Diagnostic efficacies of CSC and TSC were compared, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The mean glandular dose was recorded and compared for TSC and CSC. Of the 122 patients, 63 had benign lesions and 59 had malignant lesions. For Reader 1, the following diagnostic efficacies of TSC were significantly higher than those of CSC: AUC (0.988 vs. 0.906, P = 0.001), accuracy (93.4% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.001), specificity (87.3% vs. 63.5%, P = 0.002), PPV (88.1% vs. 70.5%, P = 0.010), and NPV (100% vs. 90.9%, P = 0.029). For Reader 2, TSC showed higher AUC (0.949 vs. 0.909, P = 0.011) and accuracy (83.6% vs. 71.3%, P = 0.022) than CSC. The mean glandular dose of TSC was higher than that of CSC (1.85 ± 0.53 vs. 1.47 ± 0.58 mGy, P < 0.001) but remained within the safety limit. TSC provides better diagnostic efficacy with a slightly higher but tolerable radiation dose than CSC. Therefore, TSC may be a candidate modality for patients with ambiguous findings on FFDM.

Clinical and radiological manifestations associated with triple-negative breast cancer in women from northern Peru. A case-control study.

Objective: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has an aggressive clinical behaviour, with advanced stages at initial diagnostic evaluation, early recurrences and poor survival, so the purpose was to determine the clinical and radiological manifestations associated with TNBC. Materials and methods: A case-control study in women diagnosed with breast cancer from January 2015 to August 2022 at the 'Instituto Regional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas del Norte'. We classified cases (Triple Negative subtype) and controls (Luminal A, Luminal B and HER2) according to immunohistochemistry ical analysis. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The medical reports of 88 cases and 236 controls were reviewed. Cases were more likely to report pain (p = 0.001), nodules on ultrasound (p = 0.01) and mammography (p = 0.003), superior median size (p < 0.05), posterior enhancement (p = 0.001) and moderate density (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis identified that TNBC was more likely to have a nodular type lesion by ultrasound (OR: 9.73, 95% CI: 1.10-86.16; p = 0.04), ultrasound lesion larger than 36 mm (OR: 4.99, 95% CI: 1.75-14.17; p = 0.003) and moderate density (OR: 3.83, 95% CI: 1.44-10.14; p = 0.007). Conclusion: There are particular clinical and imaging manifestations of TNBC, showing that radiological lesions that presented characteristics in ultrasound as nodular type lesions larger than 36 mm and in mammography moderate grade density, were associated with this subtype of breast tumours in a Peruvian population.

Introduction of one-view tomosynthesis in population-based mammography screening: Impact on detection rate, interval cancer rate and false-positive rate.

OBJECTIVE: To assess performance endpoints of a combination of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) compared with FFDM only in breast cancer screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective population-based screening study, including eligible (50-69 years) women attending the Capital Region Mammography Screening Program in Denmark. All attending women were offered FFDM. A subgroup was consecutively allocated to a screening room with DBT. All FFDM and DBT underwent independent double reading, and all women were followed up for 2 years after screening date or until next screening date, whichever came first. RESULTS: 6353 DBT + FFDM and 395 835 FFDM were included in the analysis and were undertaken in 196 267 women in the period from 1 November 2012 to 12 December 2018. Addition of DBT increased sensitivity: 89.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81.0-95.5) for DBT + FFDM and 70.1% (95% CI: 68.6-71.6) for FFDM only, p < 0.001. Specificity remained similar: 98.2% (95% CI: 97.9-98.5) for DBT + FFDM and 98.3% (95% CI: 98.2-98.3) for FFDM only, p = 0.9. Screen-detected cancer rate increased statistically significantly: 11.18/1000 for DBT + FFDM and 6.49/1000 for FFDM only, p < 0.001. False-positive rate was unchanged: 1.75% for DBT + FFDM and 1.73% for FFDM only, p = 0.9. Positive predictive value for recall was 39.0% (95% CI: 31.9-46.5) for DBT + FFDM and 27.3% (95% CI: 26.4-28.2), for FFDM only, p < 0.0005. The interval cancer rate decreased: 1.26/1000 for DBT + FFDM and 2.76/1000 for FFDM only, p = 0.02. CONCLUSION: DBT + FFDM yielded a statistically significant increase in cancer detection and program sensitivity.

Contrast-enhanced mammography versus conventional imaging in women recalled from breast cancer screening (RACER trial): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled clinical trial.

Background: Women recalled from breast cancer screening receive post-screening work-up in the hospital with conventional breast imaging. The RACER trial aimed to study whether contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) as primary imaging instead of conventional imaging resulted in more accurate and efficient diagnostic work-up in recalled women. Methods: In this randomised, controlled trial (registered under NL6413/NTR6589) participants were allocated using deterministic minimisation to CEM or conventional imaging as a primary work-up tool in two general and two academic hospitals. Predefined patients' factors were reason for recall, BI-RADS score, and study centre. Primary outcomes were sensitivity and specificity. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of women needing supplemental examinations, and number of days until diagnosis. Findings: Between April, 2018, and September, 2021, 529 patients recalled from the Dutch screening program were randomised, 265 to conventional imaging and 264 to CEM. Three patients in the control arm had to be excluded from analysis due to a protocol breach. After the entire work-up, sensitivity was 98.0% (95% CI; 92.2-99.7%) in the intervention arm and 97.7% (91.8-99.6%) in the control arm (p = 1.0), and specificity was 75.6% (72.5-76.6%) and 75.4% (72.5-76.4%, p = 1.0), respectively. Based on only primary full-field digital mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis or CEM, final diagnosis was reached in 27.7% (73/264) in the intervention arm and 1.1% (3/262) in the control arm. The frequency of supplemental imaging was significantly higher in the control arm (p < 0.0001). Median time needed to reach final diagnosis was comparable: 1 day (control arm: IQR 0-4; intervention arm: IQR 0-3). Thirteen malignant occult lesions were detected using CEM, versus three using conventional imaging. No serious adverse events occurred. Interpretation: Diagnostic accuracy of CEM in the work-up of recalled women is comparable with conventional imaging. However, work-up with CEM as primary imaging is a more efficient pathway. Funding: ZonMw (grant number 843001801) and GE Healthcare.

Organizational impact of systemic implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis as a primary test for breast cancer screening in Italy.

PURPOSE: We present a comprehensive investigation into the organizational, social, and ethical impact of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as a primary test for breast cancer screening in Italy. The analyses aimed to assess the feasibility of DBT specifically for all women aged 45-74, women aged 45-49 only, or those with dense breasts only. METHODS: Questions were framed according to the European Network of Health Technology Assessment (EuNetHTA) Screening Core Model to produce evidence for the resources, equity, acceptability, and feasibility domains of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) decision framework. The study integrated evidence from the literature, the MAITA DBT trials, and Italian pilot programs. Structured interviews, surveys, and systematic reviews were conducted to gather data on organizational impact, acceptability among women, reading and acquisition times, and the technical requirements of DBT in screening. RESULTS: Implementing DBT could significantly affect the screening program, primarily due to increased reading times and the need for additional human resources (radiologists and radiographers). Participation rates in DBT screening were similar, if not better, to those observed with standard digital mammography, indicating good acceptability among women. The study also highlighted the necessity for specific training for radiographers. The interviewed key persons unanimously considered feasible tailored screening strategies based on breast density or age, but they require effective communication with the target population. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in radiologists' and radiographers' workload limits the feasibility of DBT screening. Tailored screening strategies may maximize the benefits of DBT while mitigating potential challenges.

Analysis of the indications for and results of breast cancer screening by magnetic resonance imaging at a cancer center in Brazil.

Objective: To evaluate the indications for and results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations for breast cancer screening at a cancer center in Brazil. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective observational study, based on electronic medical records, of patients undergoing MRI for breast cancer screening at a cancer center in Brazil. Results: We included 597 patients between 19 and 82 years of age. The main indications for MRI screening were a personal history of breast cancer, in 354 patients (59.3%), a family history of breast cancer, in 102 (17.1%), and a confirmed genetic mutation, in 67 (11.2%). The MRI result was classified, in accordance with the categories defined in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, as benign (category 1 or 2), in 425 patients (71.2%), probably benign (category 3), in 143 (24.0%), or suspicious (category 4 or 5), in 29 (4.9%). On MRI, 11 malignant tumors were identified, all of which were invasive carcinomas. Among those 11 carcinomas, six (54.5%) were categorized as minimal cancers (< 1 cm), and the axillary lymph nodes were negative in 10 (90.9%). The cancer detection rate was 18.4/1,000 examinations, and the positive predictive value for suspicious lesions submitted to biopsy was 37.9%. Conclusion: In our sample, the main indication for breast MRI screening was a personal history of breast cancer. The results indicate that MRI is a highly accurate method for the early detection of breast neoplasms in this population.

Objetivo: Avaliar as indicações e resultados de exames de ressonância magnética (RM) para rastreamento de câncer de mama em um centro oncológico no Brasil. Materiais e Métodos: Estudo observacional, realizado mediante análise retrospectiva de pacientes submetidos a RM das mamas para rastreamento de câncer de mama, por meio de revisão do prontuário eletrônico em um centro oncológico. Resultados: Foram incluídas 597 pacientes com idade variando de 19 a 82 anos. As principais indicações para rastreamento foram história pessoal de câncer de mama em 354 (59,3%) pacientes, história familiar em 102 (17,1%) e mutação genética confirmada em 67 (11,2%). O resultado da RM foi benigno (BI-RADS 1 ou 2) em 425 (71,2%) pacientes, provavelmente benigno (BI-RADS 3) em 143 (24,0%) e suspeito (BI-RADS 4 ou 5) em 29 (4,9%). Foram identificados 11 tumores malignos na RM, todos carcinomas invasivos, porcentagem de cânceres "mínimos" (< 1 cm) de 54,5% e porcentagem de axila negativa de 90,9%. A taxa de detecção de câncer na RM foi 18,4/1000 exames e o valor preditivo positivo para as lesões suspeitas submetidas a biópsia foi 37,9%. Conclusão: A principal indicação para RM de rastreamento na nossa população foi história pessoal de câncer de mama. Os resultados mostraram que a RM constitui um método com alta acurácia para detecção precoce de neoplasias da mama nessa população.

Practice of Mammography in a Private Nigerian Cancer Foundation: Our Experience.

BACKGROUND: Despite the proven effectiveness of mammography in screening and early breast cancer detection, there is still a huge disparity in both access to breast care and the quality of services provided in Nigeria. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have attempted to bridge this gap through awareness campaigns and subsidized breast imaging services. OBJECTIVES: To document the mammographic findings of adult females in a private NGO and assess the benefits of mammography practice in our locality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of mammographic examinations carried out over a two-year period (January 2020- December 2021) in a private cancer foundation in Abuja, Nor t h Ce nt r al Nigeria. Demographic details, clinical and mammographic features were analyzed with a statistical level of significance set at p≤0.05. RESULT: The age range of 565 women evaluated in this study was 31-84 years with the majority (55.7%) of them in the 40-49 year range. More than half (52.7%) of the women had had at least one previous mammogram. Screening was the predominant indication for mammograms in 361 women (63.9%) while 204(36.1%) were symptomatic. Breast pain (59.6%) and breast lump (26.3%) were the most common clinical indications. The predominant breast density pattern was the American College of Radiologists Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (ACR BIRADS) type B (Scattered fibroglandular densities) in 241 women (42.7%). Mammogram was normal in 206 women (34.7%) while 52 (8.8%) had intraparenchymal findings. The final assessment showed that most of the mammograms were BIRADS category 1(69.6%) and 2(13.8%) signifying normal and benign findings. Body mass index, parity, age at first pregnancy, menopausal status, and breast density had significant relationships with the final BIRADS category. CONCLUSION: Mammography is an invaluable part of breast care in our locality. Evaluation of mammographic services in our private NGO showed a predominance of screening mammography while a majority of the women with symptomatic breast diseases had normal and benign findings.

CONTEXTE: Malgré l'efficacité avérée de la mammographie dans le dépistage et la détection précoce du cancer du sein, il existe encore une énorme disparité tant dans l'accès aux soins du sein que dans la qualité des services fournis au Nigeria. Les organisations non gouvernementales (ONG) ont tenté de combler cette lacune grâce à des campagnes de sensibilisation et à des services d'imagerie mammaire subventionnés. OBJECTIFS: Documenter les résultats mammographiques des femmes adultes dans une ONG privée et évaluer les avantages de la pratique de la mammographie dans notre localité. MATÉRIEL ET MÉTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une évaluation rétrospective des examens mammographiques réalisés sur une période de deux ans (janvier 2020 - décembre 2021) dans une fondation de lutte contre le cancer privée à Abuja, au Nigeria. Les détails démographiques, les caractéristiques cliniques et mammographiques ont été analysés avec un niveau de signification statistique fixé à p ≤ 0,05. RÉSULTAT: La tranche d'âge des 565 femmes évaluées dans cette étude était de 31 à 84 ans, la majorité (55,7 %) d'entre elles se situant dans la tranche d'âge de 40 à 49 ans. Plus de la moitié (52,7 %) des femmes avaient déjà subi au moins une mammographie précédente. Le dépistage était l'indication prédominante pour les mammographies chez 361 femmes (63,9 %), tandis que 204 (36,1 %) étaient symptomatiques. Les douleurs mammaires (59,6 %) et les masses mammaires (26,3 %) étaient les indications cliniques les plus courantes. Le motif de densité mammaire prédominant était de type B du système de notation et de rapport d'imagerie mammaire du Collège Américain des Radiologues (ACR BIRADS) chez 241 femmes (42,7 %). La mammographie était normale chez 206 femmes ( 34, 7 %) , t andi s que 52 ( 8, 8 %) présent ai ent des anomal i es intraparenchymateuses. L'évaluation finale a montré que la plupart des mammographies étaient classées BIRADS catégorie 1 (69,6 %) et 2 (13,8 %), ce qui signifie des résultats normaux et bénins. L'indice de masse corporelle, la parité, l'âge à la première grossesse, le statut ménopausique et la densité mammaire avaient des relations significatives avec la catégorie BIRADS finale. CONCLUSION: La mammographie est un élément inestimable des soins du sein dans notre localité. L'évaluation des services mammographiques dans notre ONG privée a montré une prédominance de la mammographie de dépistage, tandis que la majorité des femmes atteintes de maladies mammaires symptomatiques présentaient des résultats normaux et bénins. MOTS-CLÉS: Mammographie, Femmes, Nigeria, Soins du sein, Imagerie mammaire, Organisation non gouvernementale.

Artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis abnormality score trends in the serial mammography of patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To explore the abnormality score trends of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD) in the serial mammography of patients until a final diagnosis of breast cancer. METHOD: From 2015 to 2019, 126 breast cancer patients who had at least two previous mammograms obtained from 2008 up to cancer diagnosis were included. AI-CAD was retrospectively applied to 487 previous mammograms and all the abnormality scores calculated by AI-CAD were obtained. The contralateral breast of each affected breast was defined as the control group. We divided all mammograms by 6-month intervals from cancer diagnosis in reverse chronological order. The random coefficient model was used to estimate whether the chronological trend of AI-CAD abnormality scores differed between cancer and normal breasts. Subgroup analyses were performed according to mammographic visibility, invasiveness and molecular subtype of the invasive cancer. RESULTS: Mean period from initial examination to cancer diagnosis was 6.0 years (range 1.7-10.7 years). The abnormality scores of breasts diagnosed with cancer showed a significantly increasing trend during the previous examination period (slope 0.6 per 6 months, p for the slope < 0.001), while the contralateral normal breast showed no trend (slope 0.03, p = 0.776). The difference in slope between the cancerous and contralateral breasts was significant (p < 0.001). For mammography-visible cancers, the abnormality scores in cancerous breasts showed a significant increasing trend (slope 0.8, p < 0.001), while for mammography-occult cancers, the trend was not significant (slope 0.1, p = 0.6). For invasive cancers, the slope of the abnormality scores showed a significant increasing trend (slope 1.4, p = 0.002), unlike ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) which showed no significant trend. There was no significant difference in the slope of abnormality scores among the subtypes of invasive cancers (p = 0.418). CONCLUSION: Breasts diagnosed with cancer showed an increase in AI-CAD abnormality scores in previous serial mammograms, suggesting that AI-CAD could be useful for early detection of breast cancer.

Improving lesion volume measurements on digital mammograms.

Lesion volume is an important predictor for prognosis in breast cancer. However, it is currently impossible to compute lesion volumes accurately from digital mammography data, which is the most popular and readily available imaging modality for breast cancer. We make a step towards a more accurate lesion volume measurement on digital mammograms by developing a model that allows to estimate lesion volumes on processed mammogram. Processed mammograms are the images routinely used by radiologists in clinical practice as well as in breast cancer screening and are available in medical centers. Processed mammograms are obtained from raw mammograms, which are the X-ray data coming directly from the scanner, by applying certain vendor-specific non-linear transformations. At the core of our volume estimation method is a physics-based algorithm for measuring lesion volumes on raw mammograms. We subsequently extend this algorithm to processed mammograms via a deep learning image-to-image translation model that produces synthetic raw mammograms from processed mammograms in a multi-vendor setting. We assess the reliability and validity of our method using a dataset of 1778 mammograms with an annotated mass. Firstly, we investigate the correlations between lesion volumes computed from mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal views, with a resulting Pearson correlation of 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 - 0.93]. Secondly, we compare the resulting lesion volumes from true and synthetic raw data, with a resulting Pearson correlation of 0.998 [95%CI 0.998 - 0.998] . Finally, for a subset of 100 mammograms with a malignant mass and concurrent MRI examination available, we analyze the agreement between lesion volume on mammography and MRI, resulting in an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.81 [95%CI 0.73 - 0.87] for consistency and 0.78 [95%CI 0.66 - 0.86] for absolute agreement. In conclusion, we developed an algorithm to measure mammographic lesion volume that reached excellent reliability and good validity, when using MRI as ground truth. The algorithm may play a role in lesion characterization and breast cancer prognostication on mammograms.

[The possible benefit of artificial intelligence in an organized population-related screening program : Initial results and perspective]. / Der mögliche Nutzen künstlicher Intelligenz in einem organisierten bevölkerungsbezogenen Screeningprogramm : Erste Ergebnisse und Ausblick.

BACKGROUND: Mammography screening programs (MSP) have shown that breast cancer can be detected at an earlier stage enabling less invasive treatment and leading to a better survival rate. The considerable numbers of interval breast cancer (IBC) and the additional examinations required, the majority of which turn out not to be cancer, are critically assessed. OBJECTIVE: In recent years companies and universities have used machine learning (ML) to develop powerful algorithms that demonstrate astonishing abilities to read mammograms. Can such algorithms be used to improve the quality of MSP? METHOD: The original screening mammographies of 251 cases with IBC were retrospectively analyzed using the software ProFound AI® (iCAD) and the results were compared (case score, risk score) with a control group. The relevant current literature was also studied. RESULTS: The distributions of the case scores and the risk scores were markedly shifted to higher risks compared to the control group, comparable to the results of other studies. CONCLUSION: Retrospective studies as well as our own data show that artificial intelligence (AI) could change our approach to MSP in the future in the direction of personalized screening and could enable a significant reduction in the workload of radiologists, fewer additional examinations and a reduced number of IBCs; however, the results of prospective studies are needed before implementation.

Breast density effect on the sensitivity of digital screening mammography in a UK cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of breast cancer screening by category of breast density and age in a UK screening cohort. METHODS: Raw full-field digital mammography data from a single site in the UK, forming a consecutive 3-year cohort of women aged 50 to 70 years from 2016 to 2018, were obtained retrospectively. Breast density was assessed using Volpara software. Examinations were grouped by density category and age group (50-60 and 61-70 years) to analyse screening performance. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the association between density categories and age groups. Volumetric breast density was assessed as a binary classifier of interval cancers (ICs) to find an optimal density threshold. RESULTS: Forty-nine thousand nine-hundred forty-eight screening examinations (409 screen-detected cancers (SDCs) and 205 ICs) were included in the analysis. Mammographic sensitivity, SDC/(SDC + IC), decreased with increasing breast density from 75.0% for density a (p = 0.839, comparisons made to category b), to 73.5%, 59.8% (p = 0.001), and 51.3% (p < 0.001) in categories b, c, and d, respectively. IC rates were highest in the densest categories with rates of 1.8 (p = 0.039), 3.2, 5.7 (p < 0.001), and 7.9 (p < 0.001) per thousand for categories a, b, c, and d, respectively. The recall rate increased with breast density, leading to more false positive recalls, especially in the younger age group. There was no significant difference between the optimal density threshold found, 6.85, and that Volpara defined as the b/c boundary, 7.5. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of screening is significantly reduced with increasing density with IC rates in the densest category four times higher than in women with fatty breasts. False positives are a particular issue for the younger subgroup without prior examinations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In women attending screening there is significant underdiagnosis of breast cancer in those with dense breasts, most marked in the highest density category but still three times higher than in women with fatty breasts in the second highest category. KEY POINTS: Breast density can mask cancers leading to underdiagnosis on mammography. Interval cancer rate increased with breast density categories 'a' to 'd'; 1.8 to 7.9 per thousand. Recall rates increased with increasing breast density, leading to more false positive recalls.

Evaluating the impact of delayed-phase imaging in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography on breast cancer staging: A comparative study of abbreviated versus complete protocol.

PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an innovative imaging tool for breast cancer detection, involving intravenous injection of a contrast medium and the assessment of lesion enhancement in two phases: early and delayed. The aim of the study was to analyze the topographic concordance of lesions detected in the early- versus delayed phase acquisitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Approved by the Ethics Committee (No. 118/20), this prospective study included 100 women with histopathological confirmed breast neoplasia (B6) at the Radiodiagnostics Department of the Maggiore della Carità Hospital of Novara, Italy from May 1, 2021, to October 17, 2022. Participants underwent CEM examinations using a complete protocol, encompassing both early- and delayed image acquisitions. Three experienced radiologists blindly analyzed the CEM images for contrast enhancement to determine the topographic concordance of the identified lesions. Two readers assessed the complete study (protocol A), while one reader assessed the protocol without the delayed phase (protocol B). The average glandular dose (AGD) of the entire procedure was also evaluated. RESULTS: The analysis demonstrated high concordance among the three readers in the topographical identification of lesions within individual quadrants of both breasts, with a Cohen's κ > 0.75, except for the lower inner quadrant of the right breast and the retro-areolar region of the left breast. The mean whole AGD was 29.2 mGy. The mean AGD due to CEM amounted to 73% of the whole AGD (21.2 mGy). The AGD attributable to the delayed phase of CEM contributed to 36% of the whole AGD (10.5 mGy). CONCLUSIONS: As we found no significant discrepancy between the readings of the two protocols, we conclude that delayed-phase image acquisition in CEM does not provide essential diagnostic benefits for effective disease management. Instead, it contributes to unnecessary radiation exposure.

AI-enhanced Mammography With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection: Clinical Value and Comparison With Human Performance.

Purpose To compare two deep learning-based commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) systems for mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and benchmark them against the performance of radiologists. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive asymptomatic patients who underwent mammography with DBT (2019-2020). Two AI systems (Transpara 1.7.0 and ProFound AI 3.0) were used to evaluate the DBT examinations. The systems were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to calculate the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detecting malignancy overall and within subgroups based on mammographic breast density. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System results obtained from standard-of-care human double-reading were compared against AI results with use of the DeLong test. Results Of 419 female patients (median age, 60 years [IQR, 52-70 years]) included, 58 had histologically proven breast cancer. The AUC was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.91), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.95), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99) for Transpara, ProFound AI, and human double-reading, respectively. For Transpara, a rule-out criterion of score 7 or lower yielded 100% (95% CI: 94.2, 100.0) sensitivity and 60.9% (95% CI: 55.7, 66.0) specificity. The rule-in criterion of higher than score 9 yielded 96.6% sensitivity (95% CI: 88.1, 99.6) and 78.1% specificity (95% CI: 73.8, 82.5). For ProFound AI, a rule-out criterion of lower than score 51 yielded 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 93.8, 100) and 67.0% specificity (95% CI: 62.2, 72.1). The rule-in criterion of higher than score 69 yielded 93.1% (95% CI: 83.3, 98.1) sensitivity and 82.0% (95% CI: 77.9, 86.1) specificity. Conclusion Both AI systems showed high performance in breast cancer detection but lower performance compared with human double-reading. Keywords: Mammography, Breast, Oncology, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis © RSNA, 2024.

Mammogram mastery: A robust dataset for breast cancer detection and medical education.

This data article presents a comprehensive dataset comprising breast cancer images collected from patients, encompassing two distinct sets: one from individuals diagnosed with breast cancer and another from those without the condition. Expert physicians carefully select, verify, and categorize the dataset to guarantee its quality and dependability for use in research and teaching. The dataset, which originates from Sulaymaniyah, Iraq, provides a distinctive viewpoint on the frequency and features of breast cancer in the area. This dataset offers a wealth of information for developing and testing deep learning algorithms for identifying breast cancer, with 745 original images and 9,685 augmented images. The addition of augmented X-rays to the dataset increases its adaptability for algorithm development and instructional projects. This dataset holds immense potential for advancing medical research, aiding in the development of innovative diagnostic tools, and fostering educational opportunities for medical students interested in breast cancer detection and diagnosis.

Deep learning radiomics based on multimodal imaging for distinguishing benign and malignant breast tumours.

Objectives: This study aimed to develop a deep learning radiomic model using multimodal imaging to differentiate benign and malignant breast tumours. Methods: Multimodality imaging data, including ultrasonography (US), mammography (MG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), from 322 patients (112 with benign breast tumours and 210 with malignant breast tumours) with histopathologically confirmed breast tumours were retrospectively collected between December 2018 and May 2023. Based on multimodal imaging, the experiment was divided into three parts: traditional radiomics, deep learning radiomics, and feature fusion. We tested the performance of seven classifiers, namely, SVM, KNN, random forest, extra trees, XGBoost, LightGBM, and LR, on different feature models. Through feature fusion using ensemble and stacking strategies, we obtained the optimal classification model for benign and malignant breast tumours. Results: In terms of traditional radiomics, the ensemble fusion strategy achieved the highest accuracy, AUC, and specificity, with values of 0.892, 0.942 [0.886-0.996], and 0.956 [0.873-1.000], respectively. The early fusion strategy with US, MG, and MRI achieved the highest sensitivity of 0.952 [0.887-1.000]. In terms of deep learning radiomics, the stacking fusion strategy achieved the highest accuracy, AUC, and sensitivity, with values of 0.937, 0.947 [0.887-1.000], and 1.000 [0.999-1.000], respectively. The early fusion strategies of US+MRI and US+MG achieved the highest specificity of 0.954 [0.867-1.000]. In terms of feature fusion, the ensemble and stacking approaches of the late fusion strategy achieved the highest accuracy of 0.968. In addition, stacking achieved the highest AUC and specificity, which were 0.997 [0.990-1.000] and 1.000 [0.999-1.000], respectively. The traditional radiomic and depth features of US+MG + MR achieved the highest sensitivity of 1.000 [0.999-1.000] under the early fusion strategy. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the potential of integrating deep learning and radiomic features with multimodal images. As a single modality, MRI based on radiomic features achieved greater accuracy than US or MG. The US and MG models achieved higher accuracy with transfer learning than the single-mode or radiomic models. The traditional radiomic and depth features of US+MG + MR achieved the highest sensitivity under the early fusion strategy, showed higher diagnostic performance, and provided more valuable information for differentiation between benign and malignant breast tumours.

Breast Arterial Calcifications on Mammography: Awareness and Reporting Preferences Amongst Referring Physicians in Canada.

Purpose: Breast arterial calcifications (BAC) on mammography have been correlated with increased cardiovascular risk. The Canadian Society of Breast Imaging released a position statement on BAC reporting in January 2023. This study evaluates the awareness of the clinical significance of BAC and reporting preferences of referring physicians in Canada. Methods: A 15-question survey was distributed to Canadian physicians who may review mammography results via regional and subspecialty associations and on social media following local institutional ethical approval. Responses were collected over 10 weeks from February to April 2023. Results: Seventy-two complete responses were obtained. We are unable to determine the response rate, given the means of distribution. Only 17% (12/72) of responding physicians were previously aware of the association between BAC and increased cardiovascular risk, and 51% (37/72) preferred the inclusion of BAC in the mammography report. Fifty-six percent (40/72) indicated that BAC reporting would prompt further investigation, and 63% (45/72) would inform patients that their mammogram showed evidence of BAC. Sixty-nine percent (50/72) would find grading of BAC beneficial and 71% (51/72) agreed that there is a need for national guidelines. Conclusion: Less than a quarter of responding Canadian referring physicians were previously aware of the association between BAC and cardiovascular risk, although half of respondents indicated a preference for BAC reporting on mammography. Most participating physicians would inform their patients of the presence of BAC and consider further cardiovascular risk management. There was consensus that a national BAC grading system and clinical management guidelines would be beneficial.

Mammographic features differ with body composition in women with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: There are several breast cancer (BC) risk factors-many related to body composition, hormonal status, and fertility patterns. However, it is not known if risk factors in healthy women are associated with specific mammographic features at the time of BC diagnosis. Our aim was to assess the potential association between pre-diagnostic body composition and mammographic features in the diagnostic BC image. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective Malmö Diet and Cancer Study includes women with invasive BC from 1991 to 2014 (n = 1116). BC risk factors at baseline were registered (anthropometric measures, menopausal status, and parity) along with mammography data from BC diagnosis (breast density, mammographic tumor appearance, and mode of detection). We investigated associations between anthropometric measures and mammographic features via logistic regression analyses, yielding odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: There was an association between high body mass index (BMI) (≥ 30) at baseline and spiculated tumor appearance (OR 1.370 (95% CI: 0.941-2.010)), primarily in women with clinically detected cancers (OR 2.240 (95% CI: 1.280-3.940)), and in postmenopausal women (OR 1.580 (95% CI: 1.030-2.440)). Furthermore, an inverse association between high BMI (≥ 30) and high breast density (OR 0.270 (95% CI: 0.166-0.438)) was found. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated an association between obesity and a spiculated mass on mammography-especially in women with clinically detected cancers and in postmenopausal women. These findings offer insights on the relationship between risk factors in healthy women and related mammographic features in subsequent BC. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: With increasing numbers of both BC incidence and women with obesity, it is important to highlight mammographic findings in women with an unhealthy weight. KEY POINTS: Women with obesity and BC may present with certain mammographic features. Spiculated masses were more common in women with obesity, especially postmenopausal women, and those with clinically detected BCs. Insights on the relationship between obesity and related mammographic features will aid mammographic interpretation.

Deep learning modeling using mammography images for predicting estrogen receptor status in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The estrogen receptor (ER) serves as a pivotal indicator for assessing endocrine therapy efficacy and breast cancer prognosis. Invasive biopsy is a conventional approach for appraising ER expression levels, but it bears disadvantages due to tumor heterogeneity. To address the issue, a deep learning model leveraging mammography images was developed in this study for accurate evaluation of ER status in patients with breast cancer. OBJECTIVES: To predict the ER status in breast cancer patients with a newly developed deep learning model leveraging mammography images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Datasets comprising preoperative mammography images, ER expression levels, and clinical data spanning from October 2016 to October 2021 were retrospectively collected from 358 patients diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma. Following collection, these datasets were divided into a training dataset (n = 257) and a testing dataset (n = 101). Subsequently, a deep learning prediction model, referred to as IP-SE-DResNet model, was developed utilizing two deep residual networks along with the Squeeze-and-Excitation attention mechanism. This model was tailored to forecast the ER status in breast cancer patients utilizing mammography images from both craniocaudal view and mediolateral oblique view. Performance measurements including prediction accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were employed to assess the effectiveness of the model. RESULTS: In the training dataset, the AUCs for the IP-SE-DResNet model utilizing mammography images from the craniocaudal view, mediolateral oblique view, and the combined images from both views, were 0.849 (95% CIs: 0.809-0.868), 0.858 (95% CIs: 0.813-0.872), and 0.895 (95% CIs: 0.866-0.913), respectively. Correspondingly, the AUCs for these three image categories in the testing dataset were 0.835 (95% CIs: 0.790-0.887), 0.746 (95% CIs: 0.793-0.889), and 0.886 (95% CIs: 0.809-0.934), respectively. A comprehensive comparison between performance measurements underscored a substantial enhancement achieved by the proposed IP-SE-DResNet model in contrast to a traditional radiomics model employing the naive Bayesian classifier. For the latter, the AUCs stood at only 0.614 (95% CIs: 0.594-0.638) in the training dataset and 0.613 (95% CIs: 0.587-0.654) in the testing dataset, both utilizing a combination of mammography images from the craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed IP-SE-DResNet model presents a potent and non-invasive approach for predicting ER status in breast cancer patients, potentially enhancing the efficiency and diagnostic precision of radiologists.

Deep transfer learning for detection of breast arterial calcifications on mammograms: a comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Breast arterial calcifications (BAC) are common incidental findings on routine mammograms, which have been suggested as a sex-specific biomarker of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Previous work showed the efficacy of a pretrained convolutional network (CNN), VCG16, for automatic BAC detection. In this study, we further tested the method by a comparative analysis with other ten CNNs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four-view standard mammography exams from 1,493 women were included in this retrospective study and labeled as BAC or non-BAC by experts. The comparative study was conducted using eleven pretrained convolutional networks (CNNs) with varying depths from five architectures including Xception, VGG, ResNetV2, MobileNet, and DenseNet, fine-tuned for the binary BAC classification task. Performance evaluation involved area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) analysis, F1-score (harmonic mean of precision and recall), and generalized gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM++) for visual explanations. RESULTS: The dataset exhibited a BAC prevalence of 194/1,493 women (13.0%) and 581/5,972 images (9.7%). Among the retrained models, VGG, MobileNet, and DenseNet demonstrated the most promising results, achieving AUC-ROCs > 0.70 in both training and independent testing subsets. In terms of testing F1-score, VGG16 ranked first, higher than MobileNet (0.51) and VGG19 (0.46). Qualitative analysis showed that the Grad-CAM++ heatmaps generated by VGG16 consistently outperformed those produced by others, offering a finer-grained and discriminative localization of calcified regions within images. CONCLUSION: Deep transfer learning showed promise in automated BAC detection on mammograms, where relatively shallow networks demonstrated superior performances requiring shorter training times and reduced resources. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Deep transfer learning is a promising approach to enhance reporting BAC on mammograms and facilitate developing efficient tools for cardiovascular risk stratification in women, leveraging large-scale mammographic screening programs. KEY POINTS: • We tested different pretrained convolutional networks (CNNs) for BAC detection on mammograms. • VGG and MobileNet demonstrated promising performances, outperforming their deeper, more complex counterparts. • Visual explanations using Grad-CAM++ highlighted VGG16's superior performance in localizing BAC.