Autologous breast augmentation combining the harvesting of the Anterior Intercostal Artery Perforator (AICAP) and Lateral Intercostal Artery Perforator (LICAP) flaps in massive weight loss patient: A case report.

Patients undergoing bariatric surgical procedures usually exhibit breast ptosis due to the quick weight loss. In this type of patients, the mastopexy represents a challenge for plastic surgeons considering the abundance of dystrophic cutaneous tissue, the loss of subcutaneous tissue and the impossibility to employ heterologous devices in the setting of Italian public healthcare. In addition, it is necessary to consider that patients undergoing post-bariatric surgery have increasingly high expectations. We describe a new reconstructive technique which combines and utilizes both the AICAP and LICAP flaps as "autoprosthesis". It could be considered a valid option for patients exhibiting a deficiency in the upper poles with hypotrophic and hypoelastic skin texture, associated with poor glandular representation. This procedure proves to be an excellent alternative to breast implants both in the reconstructive surgery and aesthetic surgery settings.

Evaluation of Nipple-Areola Circulation in Central Pedicle Mastopexy Patients with Subpectoral Implant Placement: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

OBJECTIVE: Mastopexy is a procedure which is used in breast lift and reconstruction surgery and requires a small amount of parenchymal resection. In this procedure, the preservation of nipple-areola circulation is vital. The purpose of this study is to evaluate nipple-areola circulation in patients undergoing central pedicle mastopexy with subpectoral implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In this observational quasi-experimental study, data were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records. The perioperative nipple-areola circulation of patients undergoing central pedicle mastopexy with subpectoral implant placement was evaluated by integrated laser Doppler flowmetry. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's range tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The preoperative, skin dissection, pectoral elevation, implant placement, 24th hour, and 2nd week nipple-areola circulation statuses of each patient who underwent central pedicle mastopexy with subpectoral implant placement were examined using an integrated laser Doppler flowmeter, and the results were compared. At each stage, all measurements were in the range of 1.8-3.6 ml/min/100g. There was no statistically significant difference between the measurement results. CONCLUSION: Central pedicle mastopexy with subpectoral implant placement seems highly advantageous in terms of better functionality and aesthetics in the reconstruction of heavy and sagging breasts. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/0026.

Implementation of a Machine Learning Approach Evaluating Risk Factors for Complications after Single-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy.

BACKGROUND: Single-stage mastopexy augmentation is a much-debated intervention due to its complexity and the associated relatively high complication rates. This study aimed to reevaluate the risk factors for these complications using a novel approach based on artificial intelligence and to demonstrate its possible limitations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Complete datasets of patients who underwent single-staged augmentation mastopexy during 2014-2023 at one institution by a single surgeon were collected retrospectively. These were subsequently processed and analyzed by CART, RF and XGBoost algorithms. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients were included in the study, of which 43 (12.57%) reported surgery-associated complications, whereby capsular contracture (n = 19) was the most common. BMI represented the most important variable for the development of complications (FIS = 0.44 in CART). 2.9% of the patients expressed the desire for implant change in the course, with absence of any complications. A statistically significant correlation between smoking and the desire for implant change (p < 0.001) was revealed. CONCLUSION: The importance of implementing artificial intelligence into clinical research could be underpinned by this study, as risk variables can be reclassified based on factors previously considered less or even irrelevant. Thereby we encountered limitations using ML approaches. Further studies will be needed to investigate the association between smoking, BMI and the current implant size with the desire for implant change without any complications. Moreover, we could show that the procedure can be performed safely without high risk of developing major complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Mastopexy for secretory carcinoma of breast in a young female: a case report.

Secretory carcinoma, a triple-negative benign tumor, is one of the rarest malignancies of the breast which rarely metastasizes. Surgical excision via lumpectomy or mastectomy is the mainstay of treatment, but in young patients, mastopexy can be a better option cosmetically. A 26-year-old woman presented with a lump in her right breast that, on ultrasonography, was revealed to be a multi lobulated solid lesion measuring 25 × 16 mm2 in the retro areolar region at a 4 o'clock position. It turned out to be secretory carcinoma of the breast in a tru-cut biopsy. Vertical Mastopexy was opted for the removal and simultaneous reconstruction of the breast, which was followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Vertical mastopexy showed that the tumor was removed, and the breast was restored to its original form simultaneously. This procedure gave better results clinically and cosmetically. The patient had an uneventful recovery and is on a regular follow-up.

Navigating Aesthetic Pursuits: A Google Trends Insight into Cosmetic Tourism.

BACKGROUND: The popularity of cosmetic tourism may increase unnecessary risks for patients as postoperative care is variable. However, little is known about the current trends and public perception of this growing phenomenon. This study compares interest in cosmetic tourism in popular medical tourism destinations relative to the US. METHODS: Google Trends was queried from October 2017 to September 2023, examining trends over the full period and dissecting changes between 2017-2020 and 2020-2023. Search volume data were retrieved for the top international countries and the US for each of the top five cosmetic procedures, according to the ISAPS 2022 Global Survey. A p value < 0.05 was used for statistical significance. RESULTS: Searches for liposuction, blepharoplasty, breast augmentation, mastopexy, and abdominoplasty were compared between the US, Mexico, Turkey, Thailand, and Colombia. Google Trends data mirrored the prevalence of the two most common procedures, liposuction, and breast augmentation. Differences in interest regarding liposuction were greatest in Mexico, Thailand, and Turkey compared to the US (p < 0.05). Medical tourism for blepharoplasty had the highest search interest scores for Turkey and Thailand from 2017 to 2023 (p < 0.05). Significant differences were also consistent across all time intervals for breast augmentation, mastopexy, and abdominoplasty, with higher interest in Mexico and Turkey (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Google Trends analysis serves as an insightful tool for understanding cosmetic tourism. Changing trends bring the potential to assess worldwide versus country-specific procedure interest. These observed trends may foreshadow future international aesthetic procedure trends. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

MAMAS (mastopexy-augmentation made applicable and safer): A standardized template of pre-operative marking and step-by-step surgical procedure.

Simultaneous breast augmentation with mastopexy is growing in popularity. It is a complex procedure that can lead to post-operative complications, patient dissatisfaction, and increased risk of litigation. The aim of this study is to describe an approach for the inverted-T augmentation-mastopexy technique, which limits intraoperative modifications, minimizes errors, and decreases post-operative complications and patient dissatisfaction. The study included 107 patients with Regnault's grade I and II ptosis and severe pseudoptosis. All patients were marked according to our novel technique, Mastopexy Augmentation Made Applicable and Safer (MAMAS), and operated by a single surgeon. All patients underwent simultaneous breast augmentation with Siltex Mentor Round Silicone Gel breast implants and mastopexy. Pre-operatively and post-operatively, patients filled the BREAST-Q. The mean follow-up was 24 months. Hundred and seven women received treatment in this study. Sixteen presented with post-operative complications, eleven in the early stage of recovery, and five in the late stage. There were eight cases of minor wound healing complications, all treated conservatively. Two cases of infection were noted, both were treated with oral antibiotics. One patient experienced post-operative bleeding after 13 days, which required surgical revision. In the late stage of recovery, five cases of implant displacement occurred and required revision surgery. No cases of capsular contracture and seromas were reported. According to Breast-Q, all patients were satisfied. MAMAS surgical technique, focusing on precise pre-operative marking for augmentation-mastopexy, is simple and easily reproducible. The procedure has a low complication rate and high patient satisfaction. It provides predictable and stable results over time.

Tailor-Made Mastopexy Plus Implant, A Safe Journey Toward Breast Reshaping and Augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Augmentation/mastopexy represents one of the most complex procedures in the setting of cosmetic surgery, and there is still an ongoing debate about the most suitable approach to undertake to avoid major complications and deliver the desired result. The present study aims to offer a further contribute to the topic by presenting our personal experience with an implant-guided tailor-made mastopexy technique to manage moderate breast ptosis and hypotrophy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of our database was carried out, and a total of 194 women who underwent a tailor-made resection pattern mastopexy plus implant from November 2016 to December 2021 were enrolled. All patients included in the study presented breast hypoplasia and ptosis classified as Regnault grade II. At the first-year follow-up visit, patients received an anonymous written questionnaire that addressed their self-perception of cosmetic results and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: The technique presented in the study showed a favorable safety profile with a total complication rate accounting for an 8.2% and an overall reoperation rate as low as 4.6%. Major concerns including wound dehiscence, implant exposure, and nipple necrosis are not reported. Patients' self-reported outcomes revealed high satisfaction rates and stable results in the long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The described approach ensures proper reshaping together with the desired increased breast volume minimizing the chance of implant exposure due to wound dehiscence or any sort of tissue necrosis from devascularized skin edges. The surgical procedure described herein is safe and reliable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Optimizing aesthetic results in Asian women with giant phyllodes tumors over 10 cm: the periareolar mastopexy approach.

Giant phyllodes tumors, typically exceeding 10 cm in size, are neoplastic lesions with malignant potential. Surgical excision in small-breasted Asian women presents unique challenges where expected poor aesthetic outcomes may delay timely medical intervention. The periareolar mastopexy technique offers a comprehensive solution, enabling complete tumor removal alongside mastopexy to achieve optimal breast contouring. This approach consistently delivers favorable aesthetic outcomes, enhancing symmetry and contour. Additionally, the periareolar approach minimizes visible scarring, thereby enhancing patient satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome. Herein, we present a case report of Asian women with giant phyllodes tumors exceeding 10 cm, successfully managed using the periareolar mastopexy technique, emphasizing the importance of optimizing aesthetic outcomes in these challenging cases.

Augmentation mastopexy using the "double inner bra technique" (DIB) in post-bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Augmentation mastopexy has a 20-fold higher complication rate than primary augmentation. Performing augmentation mastopexy in post-bariatric patients poses an additional challenge owing to the reduced quality of the soft skin tissue. Therefore, it is technically complex and also fraught with complications. Implant dislocation, recurrent ptosis, wound healing problems with exposed implants, and the threat of implant loss are complications that must be prevented. METHODS: We present a case series study on our technique for stabilizing breast implants using the double inner bra technique (DIB) in which a laterobasal myofascial flap and an inferiorly based dermoglandular flap form a double inner bra for implant stabilization and protection. RESULTS: Thirty-seven cases were operated on using this technique from December 2020 to June 2023. No hematomas (0%), seromas (0%), infections (0%), and implant losses (0%) were recorded. Moreover, none of the patients had implant malposition (0%). With regard to recurrent ptosis mammae or waterfall deformity, 7 cases (2.6%) showed early ptosis within the first 3 months, and the number of ptosis decreased over time. Furthermore, 5 (1.81%) patients showed ptosis mammae after 6-12 months. Implant defect or rupture has not yet occurred (0%). CONCLUSION: The DIB is an easy-to-learn and versatile technique. It has low complication rates and can be used to achieve esthetically satisfactory mid- to long-term results.

Does Prior Breast Irradiation Increase Complications of Subsequent Reduction Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients? A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy are potentially complicated by prior breast irradiation as part of breast conserving therapy. Associated tissue changes with therapeutic irradiation have led to surgeons deciding the risks may outweigh potential benefit for those patients. A systematic review of the existing literature was performed to explore surgical outcomes of patients undergoing delayed bilateral reduction mammoplasty or mastopexy following unilateral breast irradiation as part of breast conserving therapy. METHODS: Medline, PubMed and EMBASE were searched from 1990 to 2023 according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies were combined by the generic inverse variance method on the natural logarithms of rate ratios (RR) using a random effect model in Review manager 5.4.1. RESULTS: Fifteen studies reported outcomes in 188 patients who underwent breast reduction (BR) following unilateral breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy. The median age at BR was 51.5 years (range 39-60), and median time since radiotherapy was 48 months (range 11.7-86). We compared outcomes for irradiated breast (IB) versus non-irradiated breast (NIB). Pooled results showed higher rate of major complications in the IB (RR 2.52, 95%CI 0.96-6.63, p=0.06), but not statistically significant. However, rate of minor complications was significantly higher in the IB (RR 3.97 95%CI 1.86-8.50, p<0.0004). Incidence of fat necrosis as a discrete complication was 2× higher in IB (RR 2.14 95%CI 0.85-5.35, p-value 0.10) compared to the NIB, but not significant. CONCLUSION: We found breast reduction to be safe with acceptable risk of major complications. However, the overall complication rate remains higher in IB compared to NIB. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Inferolateral Pectoralis Sling Technique for Augmentation Mastopexy.

BACKGROUND: Augmentation mastopexy remains a challenging procedure. The goal is to achieve correction of breast ptosis whilst adding implant volume, and avoid complications of premature waterfall deformity, bottoming out and further revision surgery, particularly when using smooth implants. We aim to describe and evaluate a technique to reduce implant malposition in augmentation mastopexy. METHODS: This is a technical description and retrospective review of a single surgeons' cases from 2019 to 2022 of all patients who underwent 1 stage subpectoral breast augmentation mastopexy with the inferolateral pectoralis sling. RESULTS: Over the four year period, 284 patients (568 breasts) underwent augmentation mastopexy with the inferior pectoralis sling. Mean implant size was 360.7cc (range 180-625cc). There were no early complications and 6 (2.1%) patients had late minor complications, with five (1.8%) undergoing revision mastopexy with implant repositioning and 1 (0.4%) undergoing areola scar revision. 20 patients (7%) underwent an implant upsize procedure with the average volume increase being 218.5cc and the average time to upsize 13.6 months (range 6-36 months) CONCLUSIONS: Use of the inferolateral pectoralis muscle sling allows successful one stage augmentation mastopexy with low complication and revision rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

One-stop autologous breast reconstruction: A safe and effective cost-saving pathway.

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction usually require further operations as part of their reconstructive journey. This involves contralateral breast symmetrization and nipple-areola complex (NAC) reconstruction. Restrained access to elective operating space led us to implement a one-stop breast reconstruction pathway. METHODS: Patients undergoing contemporaneous contralateral breast symmetrization and immediate NAC reconstruction with free nipple grafts between July 2020 and June 2021 were identified. A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database was conducted, to retrieve surgical notes, postoperative complications, and length of inpatient stay. A cost analysis was performed considering savings from contralateral symmetrization. RESULTS: A total of 50 eligible cases were identified, which had unilateral one-stop breast reconstructions. Complication rates and length of stay were not affected by this approach, with only one free flap being lost for this cohort. This approach resulted in £181,000 being saved for our service over a calendar year. DISCUSSION: A one-stop breast reconstruction pathway has proven to be safe and effective in our unit. During these uncertain times, it has streamlined the management of eligible patients, while releasing capacity for other elective operations. Patients avoid having to wait for secondary procedures, finishing their reconstructive pathway earlier. We plan to continue providing this service which has shown to be beneficial clinically and financially.

Long-Term Satisfaction with Breast Augmentation and Augmentation Mastopexy in the Latin American Population.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine the long-term satisfaction levels of women who have undergone breast augmentation and augmentation mastopexy procedures, while identifying the factors influencing patient satisfaction. METHODS: A self-reported retrospective case study design was used to collect data from women with breast implants. The study employed a survey that included demographic information, preoperative diagnosis, implant details, and patient-reported outcomes measured using the Breast-Q Instrument, which evaluates satisfaction with breasts, self-esteem, sexual well-being, and physical symptoms. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify correlations and differences in outcomes between the different variables. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1022 women from 19 countries, with Chile, Mexico, and Colombia being the most represented. Augmentation was performed on 72.2% of the patients, while 27.7% underwent augmentation mastopexy. Patient satisfaction with breast size and shape varied significantly between the two procedures, with patients undergoing augmentation mastopexy showing less satisfaction. In addition, patients who were unaware of their implant shape or placement reported lower satisfaction scores. The study also found that patient satisfaction decreased over time in the augmentation mastopexy cases and that patients with high body mass index had lower satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Augmentation mastopexy in patients with breast ptosis yields lower satisfaction than augmentation alone. Dissatisfaction escalates with overweight/obesity (BMI), post-surgery time, and misinformation. Implant pocket (pre-vs. subpectoral), shape (round vs. anatomical), and size did not impact satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Round Autoprosthesis: Use of Adipodermaglandular Flap in T Scar Mastopexy.

PURPOSE: This study focuses on the use of round or anatomically shaped breast autoprosthesis with different volumes prepared from the central and lower poles of the breast. The technical details and surgical outcomes for patients with varying degrees of breast ptosis are discussed. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This study involved 42 patients who underwent the Wise-pattern superior pedicle mastopexy procedure using the adipodermaglandular island flap technique. The research spanned from December 2017 to August 2022. The study participants had not previously undergone breast surgery, did not desire breast implants, and exhibited grade 2 and 3 breast ptosis according to the Regnault Classification. Age and preoperative breast measurements of the patients were recorded for subsequent analysis. Measurements, such as the distance from the nipple-areolar complex to the inframammary fold and the distance from the suprasternal notch to the nipple-areolar complex, were taken both before the surgery and one year after. A systematic process was followed to identify acute and subacute complications during the postoperative follow-up period. RESULTS: This study involved 42 patients with a mean age of 33.9 years (range: 23-49 years). These procedures were conducted between December 2017 and August 2022. The average SN-N distance before surgery measured 26.7 cm (range: 24-33 cm). One year after surgery, the average SN-N distance was 23.1 cm (range: 21.3-24.8 cm). The follow-up duration for the examined cases ranged from 12 to 18 months on average. Among the observed cases, delayed wound healing was noted in one instance, venous insufficiency of the nipple in another, and fat necrosis in a third case. The overall complication rate in the group was determined to be 7.1%. CONCLUSION: In our study, the detachment of dermal connections at the level of the inframammary fold (IMF) and the smooth advancement of the flap in the form of an "island flap" made a contribution to upper pole fullness. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the fusion of the medial and lateral ends of the flap will enhance tissue integration during the healing process, promoting compatibility between the autoprosthesis tissue and breast tissue. Regarding the rates of complications described, classic mastopexy techniques have exhibited similar rates in our findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Technical Refinements for Reducing Reoperations in Single-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The goals of mastopexy differ significantly from those of augmentation mammoplasty. Mastopexy is designed to lift and reshape the breasts, while augmentation mammoplasty is designed to increase the volume of the breasts. This conflict causes that one-stage augmentation mastopexies showed a revision rate from 8.7 to 23.2%. The aim of our study is to present some technical refinements for reducing the risk of implant exposure and reoperation. METHODS: We designed a retrospective matched cohort study, including 216 consecutive patients, undergone augmentation mastopexy between January 2013 and December 2022. We divided them in two groups: Group A undergone an inverted-T superomedial pedicled augmentation mastopexy and Group B undergone our inverted-T modified augmentation mastopexy. The groups were matched for clinical and surgical variables, with the surgical technique the only difference between the two. RESULTS: Complications were registered in ten patients (9.3%) in Group A (two wound breakdowns at T with implant exposure and eight wound dehiscences), six of which required surgical revision. In contrast, only three patients (2.8%) in Group B reported a complication, which was wound dehiscence without implant exposure in all cases. None of the dehiscence required surgical revision. The difference between complication and revision rates was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Separating the implant and the mastopexy dissection planes reduces the implant exposure and the reoperation rate in one-stage augmentation mastopexy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://link.springer.com/journal/00266 .

Simultaneous Vertical Mastopexy During Aquafilling Removal: An Effective Way to Reshape the Breast with Ptosis.

BACKGROUND: Aquafilling was used to be a popular breast filler and was banned due to increasing reports of complications. Debridement surgery is the only available approach to treat complications caused by gel fillers, but it often leads to breast deformity and skin laxity. This study aims to present a new surgical strategy to reshape the breast immediately after Aquafilling removal. METHODS: Twelve patients who underwent Aquafilling removal at our institution were included, with five patients receiving the combined vertical mastopexy in group I and seven patients receiving Aquafilling removal alone in group II. Surgical data, complications and satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Satisfaction was assessed by using the BREAST-Q at least 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The age range of the 12 patients was 41-56 years. Although the duration of surgery in group I was longer than that in group II (p = 0.011), the drainage duration and postoperative hospitalization between the two groups were comparable. All patients recovered well. Scarring was the only complication in group I, but there was no difference compared to group II (p = 0.711). Group II had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative depression deformity than group I (p = 0.008). Regarding satisfaction, patients in group I had significantly higher scores in satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial well-being and sexual well-being than those in group II. CONCLUSION: Combining Aquafilling removal with vertical mastopexy is an effective method of reshaping the shape of the ptotic breasts, offering superior esthetic outcomes without delaying postoperative recovery or increasing the risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Four-Layer Wound Closure Technique with Barbed Sutures for Inframammary Fold in Mastopexy Augmentation.

BACKGROUND: The inframammary fold (IMF) is an important landmark in breast aesthetic surgery. In augmentation mastopexy procedures, secure and accurate placement of the IMF is essential to aesthetic outcomes and to allow the new IMF to heal in the correct position without displacement. The authors present a simple and efficient four-layer wound closure technique using barbed sutures for closure of the repositioned IMF in augmentation mastopexy procedures. This method was previously described by the first author for reset of the IMF in breast augmentation surgery and has been adapted to the longer IMF incision in augmentation mastopexy procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of 335 patients who underwent bilateral breast augmentation mastopexy procedures with a Wise pattern technique at a single unit. The newly reset IMF was closed using barbed sutures and a four-layer closure technique. RESULTS: There were no cases of complications related to wound healing or wound dehiscence. One patient required explantation for an infected implant. CONCLUSION: The four-layer wound closure technique with barbed sutures provides a quick and efficient method for accurate closure of the newly reset IMF, with positive outcomes related to wound healing. Secure and accurate placement of the inframammary fold is crucial in augmentation mastopexy procedures. The use of a four-layer wound closure technique with barbed sutures provides an efficient method for accurate closure of the newly reset inframammary fold. This method was previously described by the first author for reset of the IMF in breast augmentation surgery and has been adapted to the longer IMF incision in augmentation mastopexy procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Staged breast reconstruction utilizing primary nipple repositioning surgery prior to nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Staged nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) following mastopexy or breast reduction has become increasingly utilized in patients with large or ptotic breasts. The safety and efficacy of this approach has been demonstrated in recent years. However, the optimal timing between stages has not been established. The authors provide their experience with this staged approach with emphasis on timing between stages. An institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Data of all patients at a single institution who underwent staged NSM following mastopexy or reduction mammaplasty for therapeutic or prophylactic oncologic surgical management from 2016 to 2020 were reviewed. Timing between stages as well as surgical, oncologic, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated. Nineteen patients (38 breasts) underwent staged NSM following planned mastopexy/breast reduction. The mean time interval between stages was 25 weeks. No patients developed nipple areolar complex necrosis. Infection and hematoma were seen in one breast (2.6%) and seroma in two (5.3%) after NSM. Delayed wound healing was seen in eight breasts (21.1%) after first stage mastopexy/reduction and in 12 breasts (31.6%) after NSM. Skin flap necrosis was noted in two breasts (5.3%) after NSM. No patients developed oncological recurrence. Mean patient-reported post-operative satisfaction and well-being scores were 63 and 67 out of 100, respectively. The authors describe their experience with staged NSM following nipple repositioning procedures. Their results suggest that this procedure can be performed safely with cosmetically favorable results if surgeons wait an average of 25 weeks between first and second stage procedures.

Marking the nipple-areola complex in mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty: a geometrical method.

Mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty are well-established procedures used to address ptotic and hypertrophic breasts. A variety of methods have been described in the literature for managing the three main aspects of these procedures: skin excess, parenchyma, and the nipple-areola complex (NAC). Among these techniques, several have specifically addressed the markings of the NAC in procedures involving a preoperatively established NAC position. While many of these have proven effective over time, the literature lacks standardized and reproducible methods. In this paper, we introduce, step-by-step, a novel approach based on geometrical principles to address this limitation. This method involves the simple process of drawing two hemi circumferences on the vertical limbs of the skin resection pattern, which are commonly marked using the Bisemberg maneuver or similar techniques. The method we introduce is adaptable to virtually all NAC pedicles. Furthermore, as exemplified in the accompanying video, it can be incorporated to most skin resection patterns with a preoperatively defined NAC position. The clinical application, as evidenced in the case reported, appears to be promising. Although it has some limitations, this procedure shows the potential to reduce inaccuracy by minimizing variability factors. As a result, even inexperienced surgeons can achieve precise markings.

Comparative Analysis of Lower Island Flap Transposition (LIFT) in Wise-Pattern Mastopexy: Does It Improve Upper Pole Fullness and Breast Harmony?

BACKGROUND: Utilization of autologous parenchymal flaps aims to attain enduringly favourable outcomes and uphold volume in the upper breast pole after mastopexy procedures. The objective of this study was to juxtapose and scrutinize postoperative upper pole fullness, upper/lower pole ratios, occurrences of bottoming-out deformity, and complication rates between two patient cohorts: those who underwent the wise-pattern superior pedicle mastopexy with the LIFT technique and those who underwent the conventional wise-pattern superior pedicle mastopexy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the patients in this study were appropriately categorized as primary patients, signifying their lack of any prior breast surgery history. These individuals presented with grades II and III breast ptosis on both breasts, ranging from moderate to severe deformities per the Regnault classification. Importantly, all patients uniformly expressed their desire to achieve a firmer breast appearance without recourse to using breast implants. The patients' ages and preoperative breast measurements were recorded for analysis. Measurements, including the distance from the NAC to the inframammary fold and from the sternal notch to the NAC, were systematically measured both before the surgery and at the 1-year postoperative mark. RESULTS: The upper and lower pole ratios, defined by Mallucci and Branford, were found to be 45.22% ± 2.20% and 54.88% ± 2.20%, respectively, within the LIFT group. In 13 instances, a lower pole distance exceeding 55% indicated a potential bottoming-out deformity (value lower than 45%/55% ratio or 0.818). Conversely, within the control group, the upper and lower pole ratios were determined as 43.22% ± 2.80% and 56.88% ± 2.80%, respectively. These findings demonstrated statistical significance. Notably, in 39 cases within the superior pedicle wise-pattern mastopexy group, a lower pole distance surpassing 55% (value lower than 45%/55% ratio or 0.818) suggested a leaning towards a bottoming-out deformity (p: 0.003). A postoperative period of at least 12 months was essential to discern the emergence of upper pole fullness and the potential development of bottoming-out deformities. Among the cases within the LIFT group, 93% exhibited successful attainment of upper pole fullness, while in the control group, this outcome was achieved in 82% of cases (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementing the LIFT technique alongside the wise-pattern superior pedicle mastopexy decreases the occurrence of bottoming-out deformity after 1 year. Although there is no statistically significant difference, the LIFT flap technique has contributed to some extent to upper pole fullness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .