Uncovering a Rare Case of Hepatic Round Ligament Epigastric Hernia.

Abdominal wall hernias are one of the most common surgical diseases present in both males and females nowadays. However, with only a few cases reported in the literature, hepatic round ligament hernias are a rare clinical manifestation. This case shows how a common symptom such as epigastric pain can be associated with this rare condition. In general, abdominal computed tomography (CT) images are the choice of study to evaluate complications and the involvement of different intestinal sections. Some laboratory tests can be performed to suspect intestinal ischemia secondary to strangulated hernias. Primary repair utilizing mesh is the preferred surgical treatment. This procedure can be performed through laparoscopic or open technique, depending on the surgeon's skills and patient preference.

Transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation in the setting of trauma.

Transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation is a rare injury that can be associated with blunt trauma. Since its first documentation within the literature in 1946, there have been less than 50 cases reported. We present a case involving a 56-year old female who presented to our Trauma Center with transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation caused by blunt trauma from a high-velocity T-bone vehicular collision. Upon presentation, she exhibited bilateral breath sounds; however, with labored breathing, chest pain, and hypoxia. The initial chest radiograph interpretation indicated the presence of "left lower lobe infiltrates", and subsequent computed tomography imaging identified "a small lateral hernia along the left mid abdomen". After initial resuscitation, her condition deteriorated, exhibiting respiratory distress and becoming increasingly hypercarbic, requiring intubation. Review of the imaging showed disruption of the left hemidiaphragm with intrathoracic herniation of colon and stomach through the thoracic wall between the ninth and tenth ribs. Consequently, a thoracotomy was performed in the operating room, revealing a large defect between the two ribs with disruption of the intercostal muscles and inferior displacement of rib space. Lung and omentum had herniated through the disrupted rib space and the diaphragmatic rupture was attenuated anteriorly, measuring 11x6cm. After reduction of the herniated organs, a biologic porcine mesh was placed and an intermediate complex closure of the thoracic wall hernia was performed. The patient was later extubated, recovered from her injuries with no complications and was discharged. With the low incidence of transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation, there is no standardized surgical management. Recent literature suggests that these injuries should be managed with mesh, rather than sutures only, due to high rates of recurrence. Furthermore, diaphragmatic injuries may suffer a delay in diagnosis. Therefore, a high index of suspicion should be maintained in patients with respiratory distress following a blunt trauma, with close review of computed tomography.

Unusual Presentation of Incarcerated True Parahiatal Hernia: Management of a Rare Clinical Entity.

True parahiatal hernia is a type of diaphragmatic hernia in which herniation occurs through a defect in the diaphragm, adjacent to the normal oesophageal hiatus. Its reported incidence is very rare, and it is commonly misdiagnosed as paraoesophageal hernia. Although the clinical distinction between paraoesophageal and parahiatal hernia is difficult, it is essential to recognise these two separate entities clinically as their management differs. Clinical presentation of parahiatal hernia includes symptoms related to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients may also present emergently with symptoms of respiratory distress and chest symptoms. With that in mind, we describe a compelling case of a young lady who initially presented with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. However, she was found to have an incarcerated parahiatal hernia.

Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) Repair Versus Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) Repair in Primary Ventral Hernias: Experience With 50 Cases in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Background Primary ventral hernias are abnormal protrusions of abdominal viscera through the areas of weakness in the fascia of the abdominal wall. The aim of this study was to compare the benefits and complications, and the overall outcome in the Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) repair versus Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) repair in the management of primary ventral hernias. Methods After obtaining institutional ethical committee clearance, this prospective comparative study between IPOM Plus and eTEP-RS was conducted in a tertiary care hospital from December 2020 to January 2022. A total of 50 patients presenting with primary ventral hernias were included in the study, of whom 25 underwent IPOM Plus and 25 underwent eTEP-RS repairs. Group selection was done by simple randomization using the lottery method. Patients more than 18 years of age with primary ventral hernias presenting with a hernial defect width less than 6 cm, consenting to the study, were included in the study. Patients who did not fulfill the inclusion criteria, strangulated/obstructed hernias, recurrent/incisional hernias, connective tissue disorders, skin infections, enterocutaneous fistulas, pregnancy, morbid obesity, and parastomal hernias were exclusion factors. Results The mean intraoperative duration in the eTEP-RS group (192.3 ± 16.20 min) was significantly higher than in the IPOM Plus group (102.6 ± 16.78min, p=0.001). The mean duration of hospital stay in the IPOM Plus group (5.9 ± 2.19 days) was longer than in the eTEP-RS group (4.6 ± 3.17 days, p=0.02). The mean postoperative pain scores, from the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), on days 1, 7, and 90 were 3.2 ± 1.11, 2.64 ± 1.11, and 1.68 ± 1.46 in the IPOM Plus group and 1.84 ± 0.688, 0.76 ± 0.66 and 0.08 ± 0.40 in the eTEP-RS group, respectively (p=0.001). Conclusion Despite being a technically easy procedure requiring less intraoperative time, IPOM Plus had several disadvantages, such as increased postoperative pain, longer duration of hospital stays, higher chances of wound site seromas, and higher rates of postoperative paralytic ileus. On the other hand, eTEP-RS was a more challenging procedure requiring more intraoperative time; however, it had several advantages: less postoperative pain, less duration of hospital stay, early recovery, and fewer chances of seromas and paralytic ileus. However, more robust data is required to compare and validate the differences between both procedures' short- and long-term outcomes.

Giant spigelian hernia in a middle-aged female: The importance of intraoperative ultrasonography for hernia localization-Case report.

Spigelian hernia is a rare type of abdominal wall hernia that accounts for only 0.12% of all abdominal hernias. A Spigelian hernia, also known as a spontaneous lateral ventral hernia or a hernia of the semilunar line, occurs when a part of the abdominal contents protrudes through the Spigelian fascia. Due to its anatomical location, Spigelian hernia can be difficult to diagnose through physical examination alone. Here we report a case of a 40-year-old female who experienced right abdominal pain and swelling, where ultrasonography imaging was crucial in the intraoperative diagnosis of Spigelian hernia. The patient underwent laparotomy mesh repair to address the condition. The lack of consistent physical findings and the rarity of the disease require a high level of clinical suspicion in the diagnosis of a Spigelian hernia. Its associated abdominal complaints are often vague and nonspecific, making it even more challenging. This case emphasizes the importance of utilizing imaging techniques to aid in the diagnosis of a Spigelian hernia and prompt surgical intervention to prevent complications associated with the hernia.

Outcomes of elective and emergency surgical repair of incisional hernia: a comparative observational study.

PURPOSE: Incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication following abdominal surgery. Surgical repair of IH is associated with the alleviation of symptoms and improvement of quality of life. Operative intervention can pose a significant burden to the patient and healthcare facilities. This study aims to describe and compare outcomes of elective and emergency surgical repair of IH. METHODS: This study is a single-centre comparative retrospective study including patients who had repair of IH. Patients were divided into Group I (Emergency) and Group II (Elective), and a comparison was conducted between them. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-two patients were identified with a mean age of 61.8 ± 14.2 years, of which 152 (58%) were females. The mean BMI was 31.6 ± 7.2 kg/m2. More than 58% had at least one comorbidity. 169 (64.5%) patients had an elective repair, and 93 (35.5%) had an emergency repair. Patients undergoing emergency repair were significantly older and had higher BMI, p = 0.031 and p = 0.002, respectively. The significant complication rate (Clavien-Dindo III and IV) was 9.54%. 30 and 90-day mortality rates were 2.3% (n = 6) and 2.68% (n = 7), respectively. In the emergency group, the overall complications, 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were significantly higher than in the elective group, p ≤ 0.001, 0.002 and 0.001, respectively. Overall, 42 (16.1%) developed wound complications, 25 (9.6%) experienced a recurrence, and 41 (15.71%) were readmitted within 90 days, without significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent emergency repair were significantly older and had a higher BMI than the elective cases. Emergency IH repair is associated with higher complication rates and mortality than elective repair.

The role of anterior gastropexy in elderly Japanese hiatal hernia patients.

PURPOSE: As Japanese society ages, the number of surgeries performed in elderly patients with hiatal hernia (HH) is increasing. In this study, we examined the feasibility, safety, and potential effectiveness of the addition of anterior gastropexy to hiatoplasty with or without mesh repair and/or fundoplication in elderly Japanese HH patients. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 39 patients who underwent laparoscopic HH repair between 2010 and 2021. We divided them into 2 groups according to age: the "younger" group (< 75 years old, n = 21), and the "older" group (≥ 75 years old, n = 18). The patient characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative results were collected. RESULTS: The median ages were 68 and 82 years old in the younger and older groups, respectively, and the female ratio was similar between the groups (younger vs. older: 67% vs. 78%, p = 0.44). The older group had more type III/IV HH cases than the younger group (19% vs. 83%, p < 0.001). The operation time was longer in the older group than in the younger group, but there was no significant difference in blood loss, perioperative complications, or postoperative length of stay between the groups. The older group had significantly more cases of anterior gastropexy (0% vs. 78%, p < 0.001) and less fundoplication (100% vs. 67%, p = 0.004) than the younger group. There was no significant difference in HH recurrence between the groups (5% vs. 11%, p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of anterior gastropexy to other procedures is feasible, safe, and potentially effective in elderly Japanese patients with HH.

Suturing Versus Adhesion for Mesh Fixation in Ventral Hernia Repair and Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is a surgical procedure performed to address various conditions such as hernias, incisional hernias, and complex abdominal wall defects. Mesh fixation plays a crucial role in providing mechanical reinforcement to the weakened abdominal wall during AWR. Traditionally, suturing has been the preferred method for mesh fixation; however, adhesion techniques using tissue adhesives or glues have gained attention as an alternative approach. This systematic review aims to compare suturing and adhesion techniques for mesh fixation in AWR and assess their effectiveness in preventing hernia recurrence. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across relevant databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies that fulfilled the predetermined eligibility criteria were included. The primary outcome measure of interest was hernia recurrence rates. Secondary outcomes included mesh-related complications, surgical site infections, patient-reported outcomes, and functional outcomes. A risk of bias assessment was performed for the included studies, and data were synthesized qualitatively. Overall, the results of the included studies suggest that atraumatic mesh fixation with glue may have the potential to reduce chronic groin pain (CGP). However, there were significant variations in patient selection criteria, glue administration techniques, and hernia repair methods among the trials, which limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Additionally, the definitions of CGP and measurement scales for postoperative pain varied across studies, making it challenging to compare outcomes. The limitations of the review include the small sample sizes in some trials, relatively short follow-up durations, and the lack of standardized criteria for assessing variables such as foreign body sensation and groin compliance. Furthermore, the economic implications of using glue fixation compared to traditional suture fixation need to be considered.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications in Hernia Repair.

Background and objective Hernias of the abdominal wall were prevalent in people of all ages worldwide, with an overall prevalence of 1.7 percent. Recently, laparoscopic and Lichtenstein mesh repairs have become popular as they provide a rapid return to normal activities with low recurrence rates. There is a relatively high risk of complications following hernia repair, such as wound seroma/hematoma, urinary retention, and superficial incisional infection. As for complications that may develop after hernia repair, we discussed risk factors contributing to postoperative complications after hernia repair in this study. Methods This study was a retrospective descriptive study of all patients who underwent hernia repair. The cohort of patients data would be collected from patients using an interview-based questionnaire. The data obtained will be entered into a spreadsheet and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 23.0 package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results In the current study, we collected data from 274 patients with hernia. The majority of participants were male (79.9%, n = 219), while (37.7%, n = 100) overweight, and (29.8%, n = 79) obese. Among the participants, (82.8%, n = 227) did not experience any complications, while (17.2%, n = 47) reported complications. The types of complications observed were as follows: seroma formation (2.9%, n = 8), wound infection (5.8%, n = 16), and mesh infection (1.8 %, n = 5). There were no significant associations between gender and the presence of complications. However, a significant association was found between BMI and complications (p < 0.001). Diabetes mellitus also showed a significant association with complications (p = 0.005), with a higher proportion of complications among participants with diabetes. Conclusion In the current study, we found a significant prevalence of postoperative complications with significant risk factors such as obesity and diabetic mellitus. Additional investigation is warranted to validate these correlations and investigate supplementary variables that could potentially contribute to postoperative problems in hernia surgery.

Hiatal Hernia Repair: Can We Predict the Need for Mesh?

Introduction: The use of mesh for paraesophageal hernia repair is controversial due to concerns about long-term complications. This study aimed to investigate whether preoperative imaging characteristics of diaphragmatic hernia could predict the need for mesh repair. Methods: The records of all patients who underwent laparoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair between September 2015 and September 2022 were reviewed. Patients' preoperative computerized tomography (CT) imaging was reviewed and was correlated with mesh repair. Results: A total of 53 patients were included in the study. Volumetric measurements were obtained from preoperative CT scans to assess hiatal defect area (HDA) and hernia sac volume (HSV). Mesh repair was required in 43.4% of cases, all among types II-IV. The mesh repair group had a higher mean hiatal neck height (50.8 ± 16.35 versus 43.22 ± 17.08 mm, P < .032) and higher HSV (708.53 ± 577.6 versus 346.866 ± 321.65 cm3, P < .003). There was also a borderline difference in HDA mean values (23.78 ± 17.22 versus 16.8 ± 10.41 cm2, P < .059). Conclusions: Preoperative HSV on CT scans can be a valuable predictor for the need for mesh repair during hiatal hernia surgery, aiding surgical planning and decision-making. Further research is needed to validate these findings and optimize hernia repair outcomes.

Intrapericardial liver herniation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a case report of minimally invasive repair with 20-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Transdiaphragmatic intrapericardial herniation (DIPH) of intra-abdominal organs is a rare but potentially life-threatening phenomenon often requiring urgent repair. There are currently no guidelines on the preferred repair technique in this situation. METHODS: Retrospective case report with long-term follow-up. We describe a case in which the left liver herniated into the pericardium after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA). RESULTS: Urgent laparoscopic reduction of the liver herniation and repair of the large diaphragmatic defect was performed using an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh in a 50 year old male patient. Hemodynamic instability normalized after the hernia reduction. The postoperative course was uneventful. CT-scan evaluation after 9 and 20 years of follow-up showed perfect integrity of the mesh. CONCLUSION: A laparoscopic approach for DIPH is feasible in emergency situations provided sufficient hemodynamic stability of the patient. On-lay ePTFE mesh repair is a valid option for such repairs. We illustrate the long-term durability and safety of ePTFE for DIPH repair in what seems to be by far the longest documented follow-up after laparoscopic ePTFE mesh repair for DIPH.

Repair of a chronic myometrial defect with successful pregnancy outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To surgically demonstrate preconceptional laparoscopic repair of a chronic myometrial defect with mesh reinforcement, resulting in a successful pregnancy outcome. DESIGN: Video case report. The Institutional Ethical Committee was consulted, and the requirement for approval was waived because the video describes a modified surgical technique. The patient included in this video gave consent for publication of the video and posting of the video online, including on social media, the journal website, scientific literature websites (such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and others), and other applicable sites. SETTING: A referral advanced gynecological endoscopy center. PATIENT: A 27-year-old woman (P0A1) was diagnosed with myomas during pregnancy, resulting in miscarriage at 22 weeks. Laparotomy and myomectomy were performed 2 months later, and three 8-cm myomas were removed. The endometrial cavity opened posteriorly during surgery, and retained products of conceptions were removed. Periconceptional imaging done after two years showed few intramural myomas and a deficient myometrium in the posterior fundal region. Laparoscopy revealed a defect in the posterior fundal aspect of the uterus with leakage of dye, which was converted to laparotomy and myomectomy with the repair of the myometrial defect. After 1 year, follow-up magnetic resonance imaging showed thinned-out posterior myometrium with a focal area of absent myometrium in the midline and endometrial prolapse. The patient was advised on surrogacy, but she wanted to repair the defect again and try for pregnancy, so she was referred to our center. With the background of a few case reports using mesh to reinforce myometrial repair (1, 2), we counseled the patient about the myometrial repair with the additional use of mesh as an off-label use. INTERVENTION: The risk of uterine rupture after myomectomy is rare (<1%) (3), but it is a severe complication. High-risk cases, like significant myometrial defects or previous ruptures, may require surgical correction. Native repair may not achieve optimal results in all cases. Alternative approaches, like the additional use of mesh or biological materials, have been reported (4). In this case, we demonstrate the use of dual mesh for scar repair. Synthetic mesh over the uterus is used in laparoscopic procedures like sacrohysteropexy and cerclage. We used Parietex (Covidien, New Haven, CT, USA) mesh, a composite macroporous polyester mesh usually used for ventral hernia repair. It has an outer hydrophilic, absorbable collagen barrier that reduces adhesion formation. Laparoscopically, after adhesiolysis, a significant defect was demonstrated on the posterior wall of the uterus (Fig. 1). A complete resection of the fibrotic tissue along the edges of the scar defect was done to expose healthy myometrium. Myometrium was repaired in two layers, excluding the endometrium, with a V-Loc (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland) No. 1-0 suture. Parietex mesh was sutured over the repaired posterior myometrium to reinforce it (Fig. 2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The postoperative myometrial thickness on imaging and pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: Postoperative ultrasound scan after 6 weeks demonstrated restoration of posterior wall myometrial thickness of 14 mm. The patient was conceived through in vitro fertilization techniques 4 months after surgery. Antenatal follow-up was uneventful except for suspicion of posterior placenta accreta. She underwent an elective cesarean section with uterine artery embolization at 34 weeks and delivered a healthy infant weighing 1,950 g. Placental removal was uneventful. On inspection, the posterior surface of the uterus was intact without dehiscence, meshing in situ with minimal adhesions (Fig. 3). CONCLUSION: Myometrial scar defects can cause potential obstetric complications. Native repair of scar defects may not achieve optimal results, as in our case. Mesh repair of myomectomy scar defects can be used as an alternative approach, as exemplified in this case. However, further studies are required to establish the safety and efficacy of this approach.

Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Onlay Mesh Abdominoplasty in Obese Multiparous Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rectus Diastasis.

BACKGROUND: Women with multiple pregnancies often experience abdominal protrusion and/or a lax abdominal wall. Various open surgical techniques have been developed to address rectus diastasis in abdominoplasty, ranging from suture plication to mesh reinforcement. This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological changes between traditional abdominal plication and the addition of non-absorbable mesh for rectus muscle (RM) diastasis repair in terms of function, postoperative outcome, and recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This prospective retrospective study involved 63 women who underwent cosmetic tummy tuck surgery and met certain eligibility criteria. Patients with only mild diastasis recti, midline hernia, contraindications for major surgery, recent smoking history, or refusal of mesh augmentation were excluded. Clinical examination for abdominal protrusion or bulging and CT imaging was performed to check for recurrence of diastasis recti. The study included 33 patients who underwent mesh repair and 30 who underwent traditional abdominal plication. Follow-up was conducted after 1 year using CT and a questionnaire to assess various factors compared to preoperative measurements, with overall satisfaction rated on a 10-point Likert scale. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in demographic data between the two groups. Patients who underwent mesh repair had a slightly longer hospital stay and drain duration. The average waist circumference decreased in both groups without any statistically significant difference. Objective CT showed significant reductions in both groups in inter-rectus distance, RM width and circumference, and intra-abdominal circumference compared to preoperative values. All patients expressed satisfaction with scar quality and umbilicus aesthetics, and no recurrence was detected either clinically or radiologically during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive preoperative assessment and imaging techniques like ultrasound and CT scans allow surgeons to detect postpartum changes in the abdominal wall. Mesh reinforcement may be indicated for diastasis above 4 cm in obese multiparous females. Thorough preoperative evaluation permits customized surgical plans to optimally restore abdominal wall anatomy and function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors at www.springer.com/00266 .

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs. transperineal mesh repair for obstructed defecation syndrome associated with rectocele: comparison of selectively distributed patients.

PURPOSE: Obstructed defecation syndrome represents 50-60% of patients with symptoms of constipation. We aimed to compare the two frequently performed surgical methods, laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy and transperineal mesh repair, for this condition in terms of functional and surgical outcomes. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 131 female patients who were diagnosed with obstructed defecation syndrome, attributed to rectocele with or without rectal intussusception, enterocele, hysterocele or cystocele, and who underwent either laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy or transperineal mesh repair. Patients were evaluated for surgical outcomes based on the operative time, the length of hospital stay, operative complications, using prospectively designed charts. Functional outcome was assessed by using the Initial Measurement of Patient-Reported Pelvic Floor Complaints Tool. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients diagnosed with complex rectocele underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, and 80 patients diagnosed with simple rectocele underwent transperineal mesh repair. Mean age was found to be 50.35 ± 13.51 years, and mean parity 2.14 ± 1.47. Obstructed defecation symptoms significantly improved in both study groups, as measured by the Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory, Constipation Severity Instrument and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms scores. Minor postoperative complications including wound dehiscence (n = 3) and wound infection (n = 2) occurred in the transperineal mesh repair group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy and transperineal mesh repair are efficient and comparable techniques in terms of improvement in constipation symptoms related to obstructed defecation syndrome. A selective distribution of patients with or without multicompartmental prolapse to one of the treatment arms might be the preferred strategy.

Perineal Hernia Mesh Repair Using Only the Perineal Approach: How We Do It.

Perineal hernia is a rare complication of rectal surgery. Different types of surgical approach have been described, but none of them have proven their superiority. Although there are many methods of closing the defect, we selected two cases to present from a series of five cases, in which the perineal hernia was successfully resolved surgically using only the perineal approach. The reconstruction of the perineal floor and closure of the defect were performed using a synthetic polypropylene mesh. The significance of this Technical Note article lies in the fact that we describe, step by step, a surgical technique for perineal hernia using just a perineal approach.

A Comparative Study of Retrorectus Mesh Placement Versus Properitoneal Mesh Placement in Open Repairs of Ventral Hernias.

Background Ventral hernias affect millions of patients each year. Surgery is the main line of management and various techniques have been advocated; however, mesh repair has become the norm and different approaches have been described regarding the plane of mesh fixation, but none of them are standardized. Open repair is commonly practiced, and the two most commonly performed methods are retrorectus and properitoneal mesh placement. Objectives To compare the postoperative outcomes between the retrorectus plane and the properitoneal plane of fixation of mesh in open ventral hernia repair. Methods Between September 2018 and August 2020, 56 patients with midline ventral hernia admitted to Ramaiah Hospital, Bengaluru were chosen for this prospective comparative study. Group A had 28 patients who underwent open retrorectus mesh repair and 28 patients in Group B underwent open properitoneal mesh repair. The postoperative outcomes were studied in terms of operating time, postoperative complications, and early recurrence at the end of six months and 24 months post-surgery. Results The operative time for retrorectus mesh placement was significantly lower than properitoneal mesh placement. The latter had a higher complication rate overall with an incidence of 18%, with seroma being the most common complication; however, the difference in complication rates was not statistically significant. Skin necrosis was identical in both groups and 0% of cases in both groups had SSI or mesh infection. Three patients (10.71%) in the retrorectus group and two patients (7.10%) in the properitoneal group developed recurrence at 24 months follow-up. Conclusion Retrorectus mesh repair and properitoneal mesh repair in open ventral abdominal hernias have equally good postoperative outcomes.

Inguinal hernia repair in an elderly patient with moderate aortic stenosis under sole epidural anesthesia: A case report.

Key Clinical Message: In resource limited settings, epidural anesthesia can be a safe option for elderly patients with aortic stenosis for lower abdominal surgeries as the hemodynamic changes are known to be less as compared to spinal or general anesthesia. Abstract: Spinal or general anesthesia in an elderly patient with aortic stenosis is always a challenge for anesthesiologists. It is even more challenging in a resource limited setting. The marked hemodynamic changes associated with either spinal or general anesthesia increase the morbidity and mortality. We present a case of right inguinal hernia in a 71-year-old patient with hypertension, bradycardia, and moderate aortic stenosis planned for open mesh repair under sole epidural anesthesia.

Successful management of strangulated incisional hernia in pregnancy - A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal hernias, including incisional hernias, can occur due to weakness in the abdominal wall. Incisional hernias commonly occur following surgical incisions, and factors such as poor closure technique and patient-related factors can contribute to their development. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case, the patient was presented with a painful, irreducible lump over a previous laparotomy scar, along with bowel obstruction symptoms. The diagnosis was supported by ultrasound findings showing obstructed bowel loop in the hernial sac. Emergency open surgical reduction and mesh repair were performed to treat the strangulated hernia and ensure the mother and fetus's safety. The patient had an uneventful postoperative period and was discharged after three days. DISCUSSION: Incisional hernias can be diagnosed through clinical evaluation, and imaging studies may be necessary in complex cases. However, imaging techniques such as X-rays and Computed Tomography scans are limited in pregnant women due to the radiation risks. Ultrasonography (USS) is preferred in pregnant women for its safety and non-invasiveness, although it may have reduced sensitivity in obese patients. Complicated hernias should be treated with emergency surgical repair, while elective surgery can be considered for asymptomatic or non-complicated hernias. Laparoscopic surgery offers advantages such as shorter hospital stays and fewer complications. Mesh repair reduces the recurrence risk in subsequent pregnancies (relate the discussion with the case). CONCLUSION: Overall, surgical management of hernias in pregnancy requires careful consideration of individual circumstances and the use of appropriate techniques to ensure the safety of both the mother and fetus.

Hiatal hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh reinforcement: a qualitative systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Reinforcement of crural closure with synthetic resorbable mesh has been proposed to decrease recurrence rates after hiatal hernia repair, but continues to be controversial. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and intermediate-term results of using biosynthetic mesh to augment the hiatus. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed throughout this systematic review. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions and Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials tools were used to perform qualitative assessment of all studies included in this review. Recommendations were then summarized for the following pre-defined key items: protocol, research question, search strategy, study eligibility, data extraction, study design, risk of bias, publication bias, and statistical analysis. RESULTS: The systematic literature search found 520 articles, 101 of which were duplicates and 355 articles were determined to be unrelated to our study and excluded. The full text of the remaining 64 articles was thoroughly assessed. A total of 18 articles (1846 patients) were ultimately included for this review, describing hiatal hernia repair using three different biosynthetic meshes-BIO-A, Phasix ST, and polyglactin mesh. Mean operative time varied from 127 to 223 min. Mean follow up varied from 12 to 54 months. There were no mesh erosions or explants. One mesh-related complication of stenosis requiring reoperation was reported with BIO-A. Studies showed significant improvement in symptom and quality-of-life scores, as well as satisfaction with surgery. Recurrence was reported as radiologic or clinical recurrence. Overall, recurrence rate varied from 0.9 to 25%. CONCLUSION: The use of biosynthetic mesh is safe and effective for hiatal hernia repair with low complications rates and high symptom resolution. The reported recurrence rates are highly variable due to significant heterogeneity in defining and evaluating recurrences. Further randomized controlled trials with larger samples and long-term follow-up should be performed to better analyze outcomes and recurrence rates.

A Prospective Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Inguinal Hernial Repair.

Introduction Inguinal hernia is a common surgical problem throughout the world. Currently, the management options available are open mesh hernioplasty and laparoscopic mesh repair. Laparoscopic mesh repair can be performed by either transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. Many studies comparing the two procedures have been unable to establish the superiority of one procedure over the other and have yielded conflicting results. Thus, we performed this study to compare TAPP and TEP. Aim The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of laparoscopic TEP and laparoscopic TAPP for inguinal hernia repair. Materials and methods Patients were randomly divided into two groups on the basis of surgical procedures. The first group of patients underwent laparoscopic TAPP mesh repair, and the second group of patients underwent laparoscopic TEP mesh repair. Their intraoperative and postoperative findings were noted. Patients were followed up at regular intervals for up to six months. Results The mean age and mean weight distribution between the two groups were not significant. The duration of surgery needed (in minutes) for TAPP was found to be significantly less compared to TEP. In the TEP group, conversion to open occurred for three subjects (6.7%) while there was no conversion in the TAPP group. Postoperative pain at 24 hrs was found to be higher in TAPP subjects compared to that in TEP subjects, but the difference was statistically insignificant. Tolerance to a liquid diet started few hours after surgery was found to be the same in both groups. Association of the duration of hospital stays with the type of surgery was not significant. Six subjects (13.2%) showed hematoma in the TEP group while five subjects (11%) in the TAPP group showed hematoma after one week of surgery. Eight subjects (17.6%) showed seroma in the TEP group while three subjects (15.4%) in the TAPP group showed seroma after one week of surgery. Two subjects (4.4%) showed superficial wound infection in both the TEP group and TAPP group after one week of surgery. Four subjects each (8.9%) showed scrotal edema in the TEP group as well as the TAPP group after one week of surgery. No subject showed port site hernia without closure of the sheath at one-week, one-month, and six-month follow-up visits. Two subjects (4.4%) each showed groin pain in the TEP group as well as the TAPP group after one week of surgery. There were no instances of bowel obstruction or mesh infection. Conclusion TEP is a more skill-demanding procedure as compared to TAPP and thus takes more time to perform. However, it is superior on account of not breaching the peritoneum. TAPP is favorable for larger hernias. The choice of procedure should be individualized according to the patient's characteristics and surgeon's preference.