Comparative Evaluation of Oral and Intranasal Administration of Midazolam as Preanesthetic Medication in Pediatric Dental Patients Treated under General Anesthesia.

Aims and background: Midazolam is commonly used as a preanesthetic medication for behavior management of children. The current study is conducted to find out the effect of midazolam through nasal and oral routes as a premedicament in pediatric patients treated under general anesthesia. The main aims of the study were: to compare the effect of oral syrup and intranasal spray as preanesthetic medication; to record the undesirable side effects of midazolam by both routes. Materials and methods: The patients aged 2-6 years of either sex were randomly divided into two equal groups of 30 each-group I: oral; group II: intranasal. Results: The oral and intranasal routes of midazolam were found to be equally effective and provided adequate sedation for easy separation from the parents and cooperation from children during the induction of anesthesia with minimal side effects. Conclusion: Based on the study results, we can conclude that both oral and intranasal midazolam can be used as preanesthetic medication for pediatric dental patients treated under general anesthesia. Clinical significance: In pediatric patients, the oral route should be preferred for midazolam premedication in comparison to the intranasal route. How to cite this article: Swati, Shah RK, Tandon S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Oral and Intranasal Administration of Midazolam as Preanesthetic Medication in Pediatric Dental Patients Treated under General Anesthesia. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):881-886.

End-tidal capnographic monitoring during flexible bronchoscopy under fentanyl and midazolam sedation.

BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopic examination including endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is well established for lung cancer diagnosis and staging. Sedation using fentanyl and midazolam is recommended during bronchoscopic examinations. Meanwhile, inadvertent oversedation is a clinical problem. The objective of this research was to estimate the frequency of apnea episodes by end-tidal capnography under fentanyl and midazolam sedation during bronchoscopy. METHODS: Eighty-five patients were enrolled retrospectively between August 2017 and March 2018 at Okayama Medical Center. Apnea was defined as the cessation of airflow for more than 10 seconds. We reviewed medical records, including capnographic data, by cap-ONE YG-227T (NIHON KOHDEN, Tokyo, Japan) during flexible bronchoscopy under fentanyl and midazolam sedation. RESULTS: Patients received 49.4±20.6 µg of fentanyl [mean ± standard deviation (SD)] and 4.35±2.0 mg of midazolam (mean ± SD). The patients included 52 males and 33 females; the median age was 71 (range, 31-88) years were enrolled. Apnea episodes were recorded (median duration 18 seconds) in 85 patients (100%). Prolonged apnea episodes with more than 30 seconds occurred in 56 patients (65.8%). Furthermore, the median time was 32 (range, 5-102) seconds whose delay between the onset of an apnea episode and decline in the SpO2 level of ≥4% from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: End-tidal capnography, cap-ONE YG-227T was effective for detecting the occurrence of apnea in patients undergoing a bronchoscopic examination under fentanyl and midazolam sedation. Monitoring might be useful for preventing inadvertent oversedation.

Propofol Compared to Midazolam Sedation and to General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Microwave Ablation in Patients with Hepatic Malignancies: A Single-Center Comparative Analysis of Three Historical Cohorts.

PURPOSE: In percutaneous ablation procedures, periprocedural pain, unrest and respiratory concerns can be detrimental to achieve a safe and efficacious ablation and impair treatment outcome. This study aimed to compare the association between anesthetic technique and local disease control in patients undergoing percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This IRB-exempted single-center comparative, retrospective analysis of three cohorts analyzed 90 patients treated for hepatic malignancies from January 2013 until September 2018. The local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS), safety and periprocedural pain perception were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses to correct for potential confounders. RESULTS: In 114 procedures (22 general anesthesia; 32 midazolam; 60 propofol), 171 liver tumors (136 CRLM; 35 HCC) were treated with percutaneous MWA. Propofol and general anesthesia were superior to midazolam/fentanyl sedation regarding LTPFS (4/94 [4.3%] vs. 19/42 [45.2%] vs. 2/35 [5.7%]; P < 0.001, respectively). Local tumor progression rate was 14.6% (25/171). Eighteen tumors (72.0%) were retreated by ablation. Of them, 14 (78%) were previously treated with midazolam. Propofol versus midazolam (P < 0.001), general anesthesia versus midazolam (P = 0.016), direct postprocedural visual analog pain score above 5 (P = 0.050) and more than one tumor per procedure (P = 0.045) were predictors for LTPFS. Multivariate analysis revealed that propofol versus midazolam (HR 7.94 [95% CI 0.04-0.39; P < 0.001]) and general anesthesia versus midazolam (HR 6.33 [95% CI 0.04-0.69; P = 0.014]) were associated with LTPFS. Pain during and directly after treatment was significantly worse in patients who received midazolam sedation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to propofol and general anesthesia, midazolam/fentanyl sedation was associated with an increased periprocedural perception of pain and lower local tumor progression-free survival. To reduce the number of repeat procedures required to eradicate hepatic malignancies, general anesthesia and propofol sedation should be favored over midazolam.

Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Midazolam Using Jet-injector in Pediatric Sedation; a Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The quality of interventions in children is largely dependent on their control. Hence, this study compared the sedative effects of subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) Midazolam in pediatric sedation induction. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on children aged 1-6 years presenting to emergency departments of Shahid Sadoughi and Shahid Rahnemoon Hospitals, Yazd, Iran. Participants were randomly assigned to IV or SC midazolam using a jet injector and success rate, degree of sedation, and satisfaction of parents and physician were compared between groups. RESULTS: 60 cases with the mean age of 3.15±1.43 (1-6) years were randomly assigned to the SC (30 cases) or IV (30 cases) groups (56.7% female). SC and IV groups were similar regarding the mean age (p = 0.165) and sex (p = 0.121). Depth of sedation (p=0.900), control of child (p=0.711), in-charge physician's satisfaction (p=0.467), successful sedation and need for rescue dose (p=0.519) were not different between groups. IV midazolam group had a significantly shorter recovery time (about 10 minutes; p=0.040) and SC midazolam group had a significantly higher level of parent satisfaction (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings indicate no significant difference in depth of sedation, control of child, in-charge physician's satisfaction, successful sedation (reaching stage 1 of sedation or higher), and need for rescue dose of SC and IV midazolam. Parents' satisfaction was significantly greater with SC administration and IV injection had shorter recovery time.

Clinical comparative study on Nitrous Oxide inhalation versus intravenous propofol and Midazolam sedation in Transnasal Gastroscopy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the Clinical practice value of nitrous oxide inhalation and intravenous propofol and midazolam sedation in transnasal gastroscopy. METHOD: From December 2012 to April 2014, two hundred patients receiving painless transnasal gastroscopy on a voluntary basis were selected in Endoscopy center, The First People's Hospital of GuiYang. Patients were divided into two groups: Group-1 consisted of one hundred patients sedated by nitrous oxide inhalation and Group-2 consisted of one hundred patients sedated by intravenous propofol and midazolam. Patients were then examined by transnasal gastroscopy. Patient blood pressure, heart rate, pulse rate and oxygen saturation before, during and after gastroscopy were recorded for both groups. The duration of the gastroscopy and the time of awakening were also recorded. After examination, the patients were asked to assess the level of discomfort experiences during the gastroscopy procedure. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent the transnasal gastroscopy. There were 57 males and 43 females in the nitrous oxide inhalation group with an average age of 43.11±8.27 years. The average duration of examination and time of awaking in the nitrous oxide inhalation group was of 152.7±9.80 secs and 50±7.89 secs respectively. For the intravenous propofol and midazolam sedation group, there were 53 males and 47 females with an average age of 41.26±7.98 years. The average duration of examination and time of awaking in the intravenous propofol and midazolam sedation group was of 149.07±10.25 seconds and 390±20.89# seconds respectively. The two groups showed no significant difference in the duration of examination. There was no difference in the age or sex. The former had a less significant impact on heart rate, oxygen saturation and blood pressure, while the intravenous propofol and midazolam sedation decreased blood pressure dramatically and this effect persisted after examination. CONCLUSION: Nitrous oxide inhalation has higher safety and tolerance with a brighter application prospect for transnasal gastroscopy.

IV ATP potentiates midazolam sedation as assessed by bispectral index.

In this study, by measuring bispectral index (BIS), we tested the hypothesis that intravenous adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) infusion would deepen the level of midazolam-induced sedation. Ten healthy volunteers underwent 2 experiments with at least 2 weeks' interval: immediately after intravenous bolus administration of midazolam (0.04 mg/kg), they received continuous infusion of either ATP infusion (100 µg/kg/min) or placebo (saline) for 40 minutes in a double-blind, randomized, crossover manner. Changes in BIS values and responsiveness to verbal command as well as cardiorespiratory variables were observed throughout the study periods. Administration of midazolam alone reduced BIS value from control: 97 ± 1 to 68 ± 18 at 25 minutes, which was accompanied by significant cardiopulmonary depressant effects, while maintaining responsiveness to verbal command (consciousness) throughout the study period. Coadministration of ATP with midazolam further reduced BIS value to 51 ± 13, associated with complete loss of consciousness without adverse effect on the cardiorespiratory systems. We conclude that the addition of ATP infusion to midazolam significantly enhances midazolam sedation without disturbing cardiorespiratory functions.

Intracerebral Hemorrhage after Vesicolitholapaxy under Spinal Anesthesia: A case report / 대한마취과학회지

Intracerebral hemorrhage is a rare complication of spinal anesthesia. We report a case in a 83-year-old man with a history of Alzheimer dementia who underwent vesicolitholapaxy with spinal anesthesia and midazolam sedation. Until 1 hour after the end of anesthesia and operation he did not regain his consciousness. Immediate computerized tomogram of brain revealed a left frontal intracerebral hemorrhage. An emergency craniectomy was performed to remove the hematoma. Patients with prolonged recovery of consciousness after spinal anesthesia with midazolam sedation require neurologic and radiologic monitoring to rule out the possibility of intracranial complications.

Application of bispectral index during sedation in the patients in ICU / 中国康复理论与实践

@#ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of bispectral index(BIS) monitoring during sedation in the ICU.Methods60 patients in ICU were randomly divided into three groups. By transfusing propofol and midazolam with injecting pump, the BIS of groups Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ were controlled within 75～85, 65～75 and 55～65, respectively. ResultsCompared with the pre-sedation, there was no remarkable change in the patients of groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ after sedation(P>0.05)while there was remarkable change in the patients of group Ⅲ(P<0.05).The average score of Ramsay in groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ were 2.2, 3.4 and 4.6 while the dose of propofol were (9.54±2.43) μg/kg·min, (12.69±3.12) μg/kg·min, (14.18±2.91) μg/kg·min and the dose of midazolam were (0.23±0.09) μg/kg·min, (0.25±0.07) μg/kg·min, (0.28±0.11) μg/kg·min, respectively.ConclusionThe application of BIS can make good judgement in the sedation, which showed different choices to different needs to obtain optimistical sedation effect.