Approaches for hysterectomy and implementation of robot-assisted surgery in benign gynaecological disease: A cost analysis study in a large university hospital.

BACKGROUND: As a minimally invasive technique, robot-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) offers surgical advantages and significant reduction in morbidity compared to open surgery. Despite the increasing use of RAH in benign gynaecology, there is limited data on its cost-effectiveness, especially in a European context. Our goal is to assess the costs of the different hysterectomy approaches, to describe their clinical outcomes, and to evaluate the impact of introduction of RAH on the rates of different types of hysterectomy. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre cost-analysis was performed for patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign indications. Abdominal hysterectomy (AH), vaginal hysterectomy (VH), laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and RAH were included. We considered the costs of operating room and hospital stay for the different hysterectomy techniques using the "Activity Centre-Care program model". We report on intra- and postoperative complications for the different approaches as well as their cost relationship. RESULTS: Between January 2014 and December 2021, 830 patients were operated; 67 underwent VH (8%), 108 LAVH (13%), 351 LH (42%), 148 RAH (18%) and 156 AH (19%). After the implementation and learning curve of a dedicated program for RAH in 2018, AH declined from 27.3% in 2014-2017, to 22.1% in 2018 and 6.9 % in 2019-2021. The reintervention rate was 3-4% for all surgical techniques. Pharmacological interventions and blood transfusions were performed after AH in 28%, and in 17-22% of the other approaches. AH had the highest hospital stay cost with an average of €2236.40. Mean cost of the hospital stay ranged from €1136.77-€1560.66 for minimally invasive techniques. The average total costs for RAH were €6528.10 compared to €4400.95 for AH. CONCLUSION: Implementation of RAH resulted in a substantial decrease of open surgery rate. However, RAH remains the most expensive technique in our cohort, mainly due to high material and depreciation costs. Therefore, RAH should not be considered for every patient, but for those who would otherwise need more invasive surgery, with higher risk of complications. Future prospective studies should focus on the societal costs and patient reported outcomes, in order to do cost-benefit analysis and further evaluate the exact value of RAH in the current healthcare setting.

Highly extensile approach for comminuted ulna coronoid process fractures with mini-plate fixation: a case series of 31 patients.

BACKGROUND: For the treatment of coronoid process fractures, medial, lateral, anterior, anteromedial, and posterior approaches have been increasingly reported; however, there is no general consensus on the method of fixation of coronal fractures. Here, we present a highly-extensile minimally invasive approach to treat coronoid process fractures using a mini-plate that can achieve anatomic reduction, stable fixation, and anterior capsular repair. Further, the study aimed to determine the complication rate of the anterior minimally invasive approach and to evaluate functional and clinical patient-reported outcomes during follow-up. METHODS: Thirty-one patients diagnosed with coronoid fractures accompanied with a "terrible triad" or posteromedial rotational instability between April 2012 and October 2018 were included in the analysis. Anatomical reduction and mini-plate fixation of coronoid fractures were performed using an anterior minimally invasive approach. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, range of motion (ROM), and the visual analog score (VAS). The time of fracture healing and complications were recorded. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 26.7 months (range, 14-60 months). The average time to radiological union was 3.6 ± 1.3 months. During the follow-up period, the average elbow extension was 6.8 ± 2.9° while the average flexion was 129.6 ± 4.6°. According to Morrey's criteria, 26 (81%) elbows achieved a normal desired ROM. At the last follow-up, the mean MEPI score was 98 ± 3.3 points. There were no instances of elbow instability, elbow joint stiffness, subluxation or dislocation, infection, blood vessel complications, or nerve palsy. Overall, 10 elbows (31%) experienced heterotopic ossification. CONCLUSION: An anterior minimally invasive approach allows satisfactory fixation of coronoid fractures while reducing incision complications due to over-dissection of soft tissue injuries. In addition, this incision does not compromise the soft tissue stability of the elbow joint and allows the patient a more rapid return to rehabilitation exercises.

Fully robotic side-to-side stapled anastomosis provides less anastomotic leakage than conventional minimally invasive approach in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates surgical outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE) for esophageal and esophagogastric cancer, with the comparison of the robotic approach (RA) and the conventional minimally invasive approach (CA). METHODS: Selected patients who underwent minimally invasive ILE for esophageal cancer were included between January 2017 and December 2023. We retrospectively investigated the patients' background characteristics and the short-term surgical outcomes. RESULTS: In this period, among a total of 840 esophagectomies, 81 patients (9.6%) underwent minimally invasive ILE, consisting of 24 cases with RA and 57 with CA. The major indications for ILE were adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or esophagogastric junction and patients with prior head and neck cancer treatment. Among these thoracic approaches, there were no significant differences in the patients' indications and characteristics, including age, histology, tumor location, clinical TNM stage, and preoperative therapy. Compared with the CA group, no anastomotic leakage was observed in the RA group (17.5% vs. 0, p = .035). Rates of total postoperative complications and length of hospital stay also tended to be reduced in the RA group but did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: In the Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with a side-to-side linear-stapled anastomosis, the fully robotic approach has the potential to powerfully reduce anastomotic leakage compared to the conventional minimally invasive approach.

Minimally Invasive Approaches in Reoperations after Conventional Craniotomies : Case Series.

Objective: Reoperations are part of neurosurgical practice. In these cases, an already formed craniotomy seems the most logical and appropriate. However, reoperations via large approaches can be quite traumatic for the patient. Then minimally invasive approaches, being less traumatic, can be a good alternative. Methods: We describe 7 consecutive patients who underwent reoperations using minimally invasive approaches in the areas of conventional craniotomies. Surgical Theater® visualization platform was used for preoperative planning. The study evaluated the size of surgical approach, surgical efficacy, and the presence of complications. Results: The size of a minimally invasive craniotomy was significantly smaller than that of a conventional approach. The preoperative goals were achieved in all described cases. There were no complications in the early postoperative period. Although the anatomy of the operated brain region in reoperations is altered, keyhole approaches can be successfully used with the support of preoperative planning and intraoperative neuronavigation. Given that the goals of reoperations may differ from those of the primary surgery, and a large approach is more traumatic for the patient, minimally invasive craniotomy can be considered as a good alternative. The successful use of minimally invasive approaches in areas of conventional craniotomies reinforces the philosophy of keyhole neurosurgery. In cases where goals can be achieved using small approaches, it makes no sense to use large conventional ones. Conclusion: Minimally invasive approaches can be successfully used during reoperations in patients after conventional craniotomies.

Minimally invasive versus conventional methods for aortic root surgery: Choosing the right approach.

OBJECTIVE: Partial upper sternotomy is preferred for isolated aortic valve replacement because of its optimal surgical visibility and favorable cosmetic outcomes; however, it is not commonly used for aortic root surgery, and the conventional median sternotomy is still the preferred method for most surgeons. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive approach (partial sternotomy [PS]) and conventional approach (median sternotomy [FS]) for aortic root surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent aortic root surgery at our hospital from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups. After propensity score matching, the conventional group included 156 patients and the minimally invasive group-57 patients. RESULTS: Bicuspid aortic valves were observed in 63 (40.4%) and 33 (57.9%) patients in the FS and PS groups, respectively. Valve-sparing surgery was performed on 69 (44.2%) and 30 (52.6%) patients in the FS and PS groups, respectively. The minimally invasive approach was beneficial in terms of blood loss during the first 24 h after surgery (p = 0.029) and postoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.023). The survival rates and freedom from reoperation or severe aortic regurgitation after the David procedure were comparable between the standard and minimally invasive groups (p = 0.25; p = 0.66) at mid-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A minimally invasive approach for aortic root surgery can be safely performed as the standard approach. Partial upper sternotomy has the advantage of lower blood loss in the early postoperative period and does not negatively affect the results of valve-sparing root replacement.

The endaural subtemporal keyhole: a novel minimally invasive approach to the middle cranial fossa.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a minimally invasive approach to the middle cranial fossa using a novel endaural keyhole. METHODS: The charts of all patients who underwent this novel minimally invasive approach to the middle cranial fossa were retrospectively reviewed. In addition, cadaveric dissection was performed to demonstrate the feasibility of the endaural keyhole to the middle cranial fossa. RESULTS: Six patients (5 female and 1 male; age range 47-77 years) who underwent craniotomy for CSF leak (n = 3), intracerebral hematoma evacuation (n = 2), and tumor resection (n = 1) via the endaural subtemporal approach were identified. There were no approach-related complications noted. Representative imaging from cadaveric dissection is provided with a stepwise discussion of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The endaural subtemporal keyhole craniotomy provides a novel approach to middle fossa skull base pathology, as well as a minimally invasive approach to intra-axial pathology of the temporal lobe and basal ganglia. Further research is needed to establish the limitations and potential complications of this novel approach.

Minimally Invasive Approaches in the Surgical Treatment of Intracranial Meningiomas: An Analysis of 54 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial meningiomas, being a fairly common disease in the population, often require surgical treatment, which, in turn, can completely heal the patient. The localization of meningiomas often influences treatment even if they are asymptomatic. By modernizing approaches to surgical treatment, it is possible to minimize intra- and postoperative risks, while achieving complete removal of the tumor. One of these methods is minimally invasive neurosurgery, the development of which in recent years allows it to compete with standard surgical methods. The purpose of this study was the objectification of minimally invasive approaches, such as the calculation of the craniotomy area and the ratio of craniotomy area to the resected tumor volume. METHODS: The retrospective study consisted of a group of 54 consecutive patients who were operated on in our neurosurgery clinic specialized on minimally invasive neurosurgery. Preoperative planning was carried out using the Surgical Theater visualization platform. Using this system, the tumor volume and craniotomy surface area were calculated. During the analysis, the symptoms before and after the surgery, classification of tumors, postoperative complications, further treatment and follow-up results were assessed. RESULTS: Twelve (22.2%) patients were men and 42 (77.8%) were women. The mean age of the group was 64.2 years (median 67.5). The craniotomy area ranged from 202 to 2,108 mm² (mean 631 mm²). Tumor volume ranged from 0.85 to 110.1 cm3 (mean 21.6 cm3). The craniotomy size of minimally invasive approaches to the skull base was 3-5 times smaller than standard approaches. Skull base meningiomas accounted for 19 cases (35.2%), convexity meningiomas for 26 cases (48.1%), and falx and tentorium meningiomas for 9 cases (16.7%). Three complications were reported: postoperative hemorrhage, CSF leakage, and ophthalmoplegia. Relapse was detected in 2 patients with a mean follow-up of 26.3 months (median 20). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive approaches in the surgical treatment of intracranial meningiomas reduce the possibility of operating trauma by several times; they are safe and sufficient for complete removal of the tumor.

Effects of tendon elongation on plantar pressure and clinical outcomes: A comparative analysis between open repair and minimally invasive surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess whether variances in Achilles tendon elongation are linked to dissimilarities in the plantar pressure distribution following two different surgical approaches for an Achilles tendon rupture (ATR). METHODS: All patients who were treated with open or minimally invasive surgical repair (MIS) and were over 2 years post their ATR were eligible for inclusion. A total of 65 patients with an average age of 43 ± 11 years were included in the study. Thirty-five patients were treated with open repair, and 30 patients were treated with MIS. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and ATR Score (ATRS). Achilles tendon elongation was measured using axial and sagittal magnetic resonance imaging scans. Plantar pressure measurements for the forefoot, midfoot and hindfoot during gait were divided into percentages based on total pressure, measured in g/cm2 for each area. RESULTS: The average AOFAS score was found 'excellent' (93 ± 2.8) in the MIS group, while it was found 'good' (87.4 ± 5.6) in the open repair group. In addition, the MIS group showed significantly superior ATRS scores (78.8 ± 7.4) compared to the open repair group (56.4 ± 15.4) (p < 0.001). The average tendon elongation in the MIS group was 11.3 ± 2 mm, while it was 17.3 ± 4.3 mm (p < 0.001) in the open repair group. While the open repair group showed significantly higher plantar pressure distribution in the initial contact and preswing phases compared to uninjured extremities, there was no significant difference between the uninjured extremities and the MIS group. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the findings of this study demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery was associated with less tendon elongation, more proximity to the plantar pressure distributions of the uninjured extremity and superior clinical outcomes compared to open surgical repair. Therefore, minimally invasive surgery may be considered a more suitable option for acute Achilles tendon repair to achieve overall better outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Septic Shock After Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: A Post-procedural Complication?

BACKGROUND: ESG is a safe and effective technique in the obesity management, usually indicated in class I and II obesity. It is also an acceptable treatment in patients with class III obesity who have high surgical risk or refuse surgery. This procedure results in a significant weight loss and important improvement in metabolic comorbidities. Nevertheless, there are several procedure-related complications. Few cases of gastric perforation following ESG have been reported. We present a case of septic shock after ESG with preoperative diagnostic uncertainties. METHODS: We present the case of a 54-year-old male with a BMI of 43.6 kg/m2 who underwent ESG 7 days before in an external center. The patient came to the emergency department presenting abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting since the day after the procedure. Physical examination revealed hemodynamic instability, altered level of consciousness, diffuse abdominal pain, and a painful umbilical lump due to a complicated umbilical hernia. Emergent surgery was decided after preoperative assessment. RESULTS: Intraoperative gastroscopy was performed, viewing a gastric ischemic ulcer covered with fibrin and a mucosal defect and suspecting a covered gastric perforation. Firstly, we performed an open approach to the complicated umbilical hernia. Subsequently, an exploratory laparoscopy was performed through the hernial ring, where a fibrin-covered area was evidenced in the anterior face of the gastric body, adhered to the round ligament by a transmural suture of the ESG. Additionally, multiple transmural sutures were observed adhered to the greater omentum and lesser sac and an intramural hematoma in the greater gastric curvature. No intra-abdominal free fluid was evidenced. A laparoscopic barbed suture of the area covered with fibrin was performed, after its release from the round ligament. The adhesions of the sutures and metallic material from the ESG were released. Finally, two abdominal drains were placed in the anterior and posterior gastric face. The patient presented superficial incisional surgical site infection and was discharged 6 days after laparoscopic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: ESG is a novel procedure, which has proven to be an effective alternative in the treatment of obesity. However, this technique may have major complications that can require urgent surgery.

Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion secondary to lumbosacral fusion: Clinical and functional results at 2years of follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Degenerative sacroiliac (SI) joint syndrome is known to be more common after lumbosacral fusion. While this diagnosis is suspected based on various clinical criteria and diagnostic tests, it is confirmed with a diagnostic nerve block. If conservative treatment fails, SI joint fusion through a minimally invasive approach is a useful palliative approach for patients at a treatment crossroads. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional results at 2years postoperative after minimally invasive SI joint fusion in patients with SI joint syndrome following lumbosacral fusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a single-center retrospective study of patients operated between June 2017 and October 2020. Included were patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of SI joint syndrome after lumbosacral fusion surgery, who underwent SI joint fusion and had at least 2years' follow-up. The primary outcome was the improvement in lumbar and radicular pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes were the functional scores (Oswestry and SF-12) along with the level of patient satisfaction. Our study population consisted of 54 patients (41 women, 13 men) with a mean age of 59years (27-88). Thirty-one of these patients were operated on both sides (85 fusions in all). The patients had undergone a mean of 3 lumbar surgeries (1-7) before the SI fusion. RESULTS: The lumbar and radicular NRS were 8.4 (7-10) and 5.1 (2-10) preoperatively and 5.2 (0-8) and 3.0 (0-8) at 2years postoperatively, which was a reduction of 37% and 42% (p<0.001), respectively. The Oswestry score went from 69.4 (52-86) preoperatively to 45.6 (29-70) at 2years, which was a 33% improvement (p<0.001). Eighty-six percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery. DISCUSSION: After minimally invasive SI joint fusion, the patients in this study had clear clinical and functional improvements. Previous publications analyzing the results of SI joint fusion found even more improvement, but those patients were relatively heterogenous; in our study, only patients who had a history of lumbosacral fusion were included. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive SI joint fusion helped patients who developed SI joint syndrome after lumbosacral fusion to improve clinically and functionally. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.

Robotic-assisted plate fixation of the anterior acetabulum - clinical description of a new technique.

INTRODUCTION: We present a detailed procedure for the robotic-assisted plate osteosynthesis of an anterior acetabular fracture. The purpose of this work was to describe a robotic-assisted minimally invasive technique as a possible method for reducing complications, pain, and hospitalization. Another goal was to present technical recommendations and to assess potential pitfalls and problems of the new surgical approach. METHODS: Surgery was performed in an interdisciplinary setting by an experienced orthopedic surgeon and a urologist. The DaVinci System with standard instruments was used. Reduction was achieved through indirect traction of a pin that was introduced into the femoral neck and direct manipulation via the plate. The plate position and fixation were achieved through 7 additional minimally invasive incisions. RESULTS: The technique has multiple advantages, such as no detachment of the rectus abdominal muscle, a small skin incision, and minimal blood loss. Furthermore, this approach might lower the incidence of hernia formation, infection, and postoperative pain. DISCUSSION: We see the presented technique as a demanding yet progressive and innovative surgical method for treating acetabular fractures with indications for anterior plate fixation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the local institutional review board (Nr. 248/18).

The Transaxillary Approach as a Direct Route in the Management of Upper Thoracic Spine Pathology: A Technical Note with Case Series.

This retrospective case series of prospective data aims to describe the transaxillary approach for the treatment of upper thoracic spine pathology. Various surgical techniques and approaches have been reported across the literature to address upper thoracic spine pathology, including the cervicothoracic approach, anterior transsternal approach, posterolateral approach, supraclavicular approach, and lateral parascapular approaches. These techniques are invasive. A minimally invasive, less morbid, and direct access approach to the pathology of the upper thoracic spine has not been reported in the literature. Patients with pathology affecting the first thoracic vertebra up to the sixth thoracic vertebra were classified into the upper thoracic spine group. Patients with pathology below the sixth thoracic vertebra were excluded. Patients not having a minimum follow-up of 12 months were also excluded. The study analyzed 18 patients. The mean preoperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score was 7.2±1.44, which improved to 10.16±1.2 (p<0.05). The majority (14/18) of the patients had an excellent outcome. Three patients had good outcomes, and one patient had a fair outcome. Five cases of intraoperative dural leak were recorded, and one patient had postoperative neurological deficit. The transaxillary approach is a safe, viable, muscle-sparing, and minimally invasive approach for ventral pathologies of the upper thoracic spine.

Revolutionizing Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Treatment: A Comprehensive Review of Radical Trachelectomy as a Minimally Invasive Approach.

This comprehensive review explores the transformative potential of radical trachelectomy as a minimally invasive approach to early-stage cervical cancer treatment. Cervical cancer, a significant global health concern, necessitates innovative strategies for effective intervention, particularly in its early stages. The review begins by providing a background on cervical cancer, emphasizing the pressing need for early-stage treatment options. The focal point is the meticulous examination of radical trachelectomy, a surgical technique that addresses the oncological aspects of treatment and preserves fertility. The conclusion encapsulates vital findings, highlighting this approach's dual benefits and challenges. Furthermore, the implications for clinical practice underscore the paradigm shift that radical trachelectomy brings, urging healthcare professionals to consider its integration into personalized treatment plans. The review concludes with a compelling call to action for further research, emphasizing the importance of refining surgical techniques and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure the seamless implementation of radical trachelectomy. Overall, this review sets the stage for a transformative shift in the approach to early-stage cervical cancer, presenting radical trachelectomy as a promising frontier in the quest for effective and patient-centered interventions.

Estudio comparativo entre la fusión lumbar intersomática por vía oblicua y la fusión lumbar intersomática por vía posterior. Resultados radiográficos y clínicos a corto plazo / Comparison between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Short-term radiographic and clinical results

Introducción. La fusión lumbar intersomática posterior (PLIF, "posterior lumbar interbody fusion") es un procedimiento ampliamente utilizado. En los últimos años, la fusión lumbar intersomática por vía oblicua (OLIF, "oblique lumbar interbody fusión") ha ganado cierta popularidad dado su abordaje mini-invasivo y su capacidad de descompresión indirecta. Objetivo. Comparar retrospectivamente los resultados clínicos y radiológicos de pacientes operados por vía oblicua y por vía posterior a corto plazo.Materiales y métodos. Se reunieron los pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente por vía OLIF y PLIF entre 2020 y 2021. Se dividieron en dos grupos según la vía utilizada y se compararon los datos demográficos y resultados radiográficos entre el preoperatorio y postoperatorio. Se utilizó el cuestionario de Oswestry (ODI) para evaluar la escala de discapacidad por dolor lumbar y se registraron las complicaciones de ambos grupos. Resultados. Sobre 118 pacientes, 56 corresponden a la vía OLIF y 62 al PLIF. Con respecto al ODI, no se registraron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos previamente ni posterior a la cirugía. El grupo OLIF mostró mejores resultados radiográficos que el grupo PLIF en el posoperatorio, con una diferencia significativa en la lordosis lumbar total (p 0,017). El grupo PLIF mostró un mayor número de complicaciones posoperatorias. Conclusión. La vía OLIF puede ser un método quirúrgico alternativo a la vía posterior tradicional en pacientes con patología degenerativa lumbar. Esta vía permitiría obtener mejores resultados radiográficos con menos complicaciones comparado con la vía tradiciona

Background. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a widely used method. In recent years, oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) has gained some popularity due to its minimally invasive approach and ability of indirect decompression. Objective. Our objective is to compare retrospectively clinical and radiological results of patients operated by boths techniques in the short term.Materials and methods. Patients who underwent surgery by the OLIF and PLIF between 2020 and 2021 were gathered. They were divided into two groups according to the technique used; and demographic data and radiographic results were compared between the preoperative and postoperative periods. The Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI) was used to assess the low back pain disability; and complications were recorded for both groups. Results. Out of 118 patients, 56 correspond to the OLIF group and 62 to the PLIF group. Regarding the ODI, no significant differences were recorded between the two groups before and after surgery. The OLIF group showed better radiographic results than the PLIF group in the postoperative period, with a significant difference in total lumbar lordosis (p 0.017). The PLIF group showed a higher number of postoperative complications. Conclusion: The OLIF approach can be an alternative surgical method to the traditional posterior approach in patients with lumbar degenerative pathology. This technique would allow obtaining better radiographic results with fewer complications compared to the traditional technique

Endoport Assisted Endoscopic Surgery for Hypertensive Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage by Transsylvian Approach: Technical Nuances and Preliminary Clinical Results.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear evidence on the indication and surgical approaches on evacuating basal ganglia hemorrhage caused by hypertensive bleeding. Some studies have shown that minimally invasive approaches have therapeutic potentials, but its benefits remain inconclusive. We describe an endoport assisted endoscopic transsylvian approach for basal ganglia hemorrhage evacuation. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of this approach in a cohort study. METHODS: We included 19 patients (mean age 57 years) who underwent the surgery at a single county-level hospital in Yunan Province, China. The majority had a Glasgow coma scale between 9 and 12 on admission. The midline shift ranged from 16-29 mm (mean 19 mm). Hematoma volume ranged from 46 to 106 ml (mean 67 ml). Six patients (31.6%) presented with intraventricular hemorrhage. RESULTS: All patients achieved greater than 90% decrease in hematoma volume at postoperative computed tomography scan. The average operative time was 115 minutes and average blood loss of 44 ml. The most common postoperative complication was pulmonary infection (63.2%). No rebleeding, seizure, infectious meningitis, or postoperative mortality was observed. A total of 17 patients (89.5%) achieved good functional recovery at follow up within 90 days after surgery (Glasgow outcome scale 4-5) and 2 patients had severe disability (Glasgow outcome scale 3). CONCLUSIONS: Endoport assisted endoscopic surgery through transsylvian approach is safe and effective treatment for hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage. The majority of patients have good functional recovery and the rate of severe complications is low.

Robotic Surgery for Bladder Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Women with bladder endometriosis often present with more advanced stages of endometriosis. Robotic surgery has emerged as a promising approach to the management of bladder endometriosis. This systematic review aims to analyze the current literature on robotic surgery for bladder endometriosis and describe our systematic approach to surgical treatment. METHODS: This review followed the PRISMA guidelines, which ensured a comprehensive and transparent approach to selecting and evaluating relevant studies. We conducted a thorough literature search to identify studies that investigated the use of robotic surgery for bladder endometriosis. Relevant databases were searched, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select eligible studies. Data extraction and analysis were performed to assess the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic surgery for the treatment of bladder endometriosis. RESULTS: We did not find any randomized clinical trials with the use of robotics in the treatment of bladder endometriosis. We found only two retrospective studies comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy, and another retrospective study comparing robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in the treatment of bladder endometriosis. All the other 12 studies were solely case reports. Despite the lack of robust evidence in the literature, the studies demonstrated that robotic surgery is feasible and is associated with reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of robotic technology is a promising option for the surgical management of bladder endometriosis. We advocate a surgical systematic approach for the robotic treatment of bladder endometriosis. Robotic technology, with its 3D vision, instrumental degrees of freedom, and precision, particularly in suturing, may provide potential benefits over traditional laparoscopy.

High level of intraoperative lactate might predict acute kidney injury in aortic arch surgery via minimally invasive approach in patients with type A dissection.

Background: A high incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) has been recorded in total arch replacement (TAR) combined with frozen elephant trunk (FET) implantation in patients with acute type A dissection (ATAAD) via median sternotomy approach with some risk factors. However, the independent risk factors for AKI via a minimally invasive approach have not yet been identified. Methods: A total of 207 patients with ATAAD were enrolled from January 2018 and November 2019 and were divided into AKI and non-AKI groups. The current surgical strategy was TAR combined with FET via a single upper hemisternotomy approach, a minimally invasive method. An increase in the serum creatinine (Cr) level to ≥2 times the baseline level 48 h post-surgery was defined as AKI. The morbidity of AKI was investigated with a step-by-step backward multivariate analysis of its independent risk factors and a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Postoperative AKI was observed in 39 (18.8%) patients, and the total hospital mortality was 8.7%. Univariate analysis found that preoperative Cr, weight, circulatory arrest time ≥60 min, intraoperative highest lactate (Lac), and intraoperative transfusion had significant differences between the two groups. However, multivariate step-by-step backward logistic regression analysis identified intraoperative highest Lac and transfusion as independent risk factors for postoperative AKI and intraoperative highest Lac was identified as the most critical independent risk factor estimated by the partial chi-square statistic minus the predicted degrees of freedom with 4.3 mmol/L as the optimal cut-off point for prediction for AKI. Conclusions: Intraoperative highest Lac and transfusion were independent risk factors for postoperative AKI, which led to high hospital mortality. Moreover, intraoperative highest Lac was the most critical independent risk factor and high level of intraoperative highest Lac (4.3 mmol/L) might predict for postoperative AKI.

Comparison of bleeding during trochanteric fracture fixation with mini-invasive or conventional side plate fixation: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Trochanteric fractures are a public health issue due to the aging of the population. Treatment aims to reduce their related morbidity and mortality and to allow an early return to independence. Postoperative anemia is associated with poorer functional recovery and an increased mortality rate. The aim of this study was to assess whether minimally invasive side plate fixation (Minimal Invasive Screw System, MISS™) resulted in reduced perioperative bleeding compared with conventional fixation (Pertrochanteric Hip Screw, PHS™). HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that minimally invasive side plate fixation (MISS) would result in reduced perioperative bleeding compared with conventional fixation (PHS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an open randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of the primary outcome. Inclusion criteria were patients aged over 65 years with isolated reducible trochanteric fracture. The 2 surgical implants were of the same shape, the only difference between them being the locking mode of the femoral neck screw on the plate of the MISS device, allowing a percutaneous approach. Primary outcome was perioperative bleeding evaluated with Mercuriali's formula. Secondary outcomes included operating time, scar length, length of hospital stay, radiological criteria such as quality of fracture reduction, implant positioning, bone healing, complications and functional recovery compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomized to receive either PHS (n=54) or MISS (n=54). Osteosynthesis with MISS significatively reduced perioperative bleeding (median 243mL, interquartile range [152-410] vs. 334mL [247-430] [p=0.0299]), operating time (65min [57-73] vs. 79min [66-89] [p=0.0002]) and scar length after 45 days (7cm [5-8] vs. 14cm [12-15] [p<0.0001]). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in postoperative complications, revision surgery or serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Compared with PHS, MISS reduced operating time, perioperative bleeding and scar length with no observed functional difference. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Diffusion of Minimally Invasive Approach for Lung Cancer Surgery in France: A Nationwide, Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive approach (MIA) has gained popularity thanks to its efficacy and safety. Our work consisted of evaluating the diffusion of the MIA in hospitals and the variability of this approach (within and between regions). METHODS: All patients who underwent limited resection or lobectomy for lung cancer in France were included from the national hospital administrative database (2013-2020). We described between-hospital differences in the MIA rate over four periods (2013-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2018, and 2019-2020). The potential influence of the hospital volume, hospital type, and period on the adjusted MIA rate was estimated by a multilevel linear regression. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2020, 77,965 patients underwent a lobectomy or limited resection for lung cancer. The rate of the MIA increased significantly over the four periods (50% in 2019-2020). Variability decreased over time in 7/12 regions. The variables included in the multilevel model were significantly related to the adjusted rate of the MIA. Variability between regions was considerable since 18% of the variance was due to systematic differences between regions. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm that the MIA is part of the surgical techniques used on a daily basis for the treatment of lung cancer. However, this technology is mostly used by surgeons in high volume institutions.

Adjustable Continence Therapy Balloons in Female Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of studies reporting the outcomes of ACT® balloons in female patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) standards, a systematic search of the PubMed (Medline) and Scopus electronic database was performed in June 2022. Terms used for the query were ("female" or "women") and ("adjustable continence therapy" OR "periurethral balloons"). RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included. All were retrospective or prospective case series. The success rates ranged from 13.6% to 68% and the improvement rates from 16% to 83%. The intraoperative complication rate ranged from 3.5 to 25% and consisted of urethral, bladder, or vaginal perforations. The rate of postoperative complications varied from 11 to 56% without major complications. Between 6% and 38% of ACT® balloons were explanted and subsequently reimplanted in 15.2-63% of cases. CONCLUSION: ACT® balloons can be considered as an option to treat SUI due to ISD in female patients with a relatively modest success rate and quite a high complication rate. Well-designed prospective studies and long-term follow-up data are needed to fully elucidate their role.