Are heart attacks deadlier on weekends? Evidence of weekend effect in Brazil / Os ataques cardíacos são mais letais nos fins de semana? Evidência do "efeito final de semana" no Brasil

Abstract This article aims to examine the effects of weekend admission on in-hospital mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Brazil. Information from the Hospital Information System of the Unified Health System (SIH/SUS) of urgently admitted patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between 2008 and 2018 was used, made available through the Hospital Admission Authorization (AIH). Multivariable logistic regression models, controlling for observable patient characteristics, hospital characteristics and year and hospital-fixed effects, were used. The results were consistent with the existence of the weekend effect. For the model adjusted with the inclusion of all controls, the chance of death observed for individuals hospitalized on the weekend is 14% higher. Our results indicated that there is probably an important variation in the quality of hospital care depending on the day the patient is hospitalized. Weekend admissions were associated with in-hospital AMI mortality in Brazil. Future research should analyze the possible channels behind the weekend effect to support public policies that can effectively make healthcare equitable.

Resumo O objetivo deste artigo é examinar os efeitos da internação no final de semana na mortalidade hospitalar de pacientes com infarto agudo do miocárdio (IAM) no Brasil. Foram utilizadas informações do Sistema de Informação Hospitalar do Sistema Único de Saúde (SIH/SUS) de pacientes internados em urgência com diagnóstico de infarto agudo do miocárdio (IAM) entre 2008 e 2018, disponibilizados por meio da Autorização de Internação Hospitalar (AIH). Foram usados modelos de regressão logística multivariada, controlando as características observáveis ​​do paciente, características do hospital e efeitos fixos de ano e hospital. Os resultados foram consistentes com a existência do efeito fim de semana. Para o modelo ajustado com a inclusão de todos os controles, a chance de óbito observada para indivíduos internados no final de semana é 14% maior. Nossos resultados indicaram que provavelmente existe uma variação importante na qualidade da assistência hospitalar dependendo do dia em que o paciente fica internado. Internações em finais de semana foram associadas à mortalidade por IAM intra-hospitalar no Brasil. Pesquisas futuras devem analisar os possíveis canais por trás do weekend effect para subsidiar políticas públicas que possam efetivamente tornar o atendimento equitativo.

Sex-related differences in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A Portuguese multicenter national registry analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Sex differences among patients with acute myocardial infarctions remain a matter of debate. Inequalities in presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis are frequently observed, contributing to a worse prognosis in women. The aim of this study was to investigate sex-related differences in Portuguese ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of STEMI patients included in the Portuguese Registry on Acute Coronary Syndromes, between October 2010 and 2022. The two co-primary endpoints were in-hospital and one-year mortality. RESULTS: A total of 14470 STEMI patients were studied. Women were underrepresented with 3721 individuals (25.7%). They were significantly older (70 vs. 62 years, p<0.001), with higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, and underwent less frequently coronary angiography (84.4% vs. 88.5%, p<0.001) and guideline-directed medical therapy (e.g., aspirin 92.5% vs. 95.4%, beta blockers 79.2% vs. 83%, p<0.001. Furthermore, they experienced more complications, such as congestive heart failure (23.4% vs. 14.6%), ischemic stroke (47 vs. 40%), and in-hospital mortality (8.5% vs. 4.1%) (p<0.001 for all comparisons). Similarly, they presented higher one-year mortality (11.5% vs. 6.3, p<0.001). However, after a multivariate analysis testing significant clinical variables, female sex remained an independent predictor for in-hospital (odds ratio=1.633; CI 95% [1.065-2.504]; p=0.025), but not for one-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis reveals sex-related disparities in Portuguese STEMI patients. Despite limitations inherent to registry-based analysis, women were significantly older, with increased cardiovascular risk, less treated, and with higher in-hospital mortality. These disparities should be a concern for clinicians to further improve outcomes and move toward equitable medical care.

Prevalence and prognostic implications of the no-reflux phenomenon in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention at a university center in a middle-income country.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prevalence of no-reflow and the 30-day mortality in a university center in a middle-income country. METHOD: We analyzed 2463 patients who underwent primary PCI from January 2006 to December 2021. The outcome measure was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Of a total of 2463 patients, no-reflow phenomenon was found in 413 (16.8%) patients, 30-day mortality was 16.7 vs. 4.29% (p < 0.001). Patients with no-reflow were older 60 (53-69.5) vs. 59 (51-66) (p = 0.001), with a higher delay in onset of symptom to emergency department arrival 270 vs. 247 min (p = 0.001). No-reflow patients also had had fewer previous myocardial infarction, 11.6 vs. 18.4 (p = 0.001) and a Killip class > 1, 37 vs. 26% (p < 0.001). No-reflow patients were more likely to have an anterior myocardial infarction (55.4 vs. 47.8%; p = 0.005) and initial TIMI flow 0 (76 vs. 68%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: No-reflow occurred in 16.8% of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI and was more likely with older age, delayed presentation, anterior myocardial infarction and Killip class > 1. No-reflow was associated with a higher mortality at 30-day follow-up.

OBJETIVOS: Analizar la prevalencia de no reflujo y la mortalidad a 30 días en un centro universitario de un país de ingresos medios. MÉTODO: Analizamos 2,463 pacientes que se sometieron a ICP primaria desde enero de 2006 hasta diciembre de 2021. La medida de resultado fue la mortalidad a los 30 días. RESULTADOS: Del total de 2,463 pacientes, se encontró fenómeno de no reflujo en 413 (16.8%), la mortalidad a los 30 días fue del 16.7 vs. 4.29% (p < 0.001). Los pacientes sin reflujo tenían mayor edad 60 (53-69.5) vs. 59 (51-66) (p = 0.001), con mayor retraso del inicio de los síntomas a la llegada a urgencias, 270 vs. 247 min (p = 0.001). Los pacientes sin reflujo también tenían menos infarto de miocardio previo, 11.6 vs. 18.4 (p = 0.001), y una clase Killip > 1, 37 vs. 26% (p < 0.001). Los pacientes sin reflujo tenían más probabilidades de tener un infarto de miocardio anterior (55.4 vs. 47.8%; p = 0.005) y flujo TIMI inicial 0 (76 vs. 68%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIÓN: Ocurrió ausencia de reflujo en el 16.8% de los pacientes con IAMCEST sometidos a ICP primaria y fue más probable con la edad avanzada, presentación tardía, infarto de miocardio anterior y clase Killip > 1. El no reflujo se asoció con una mayor mortalidad a los 30 días de seguimiento.

Mesenchymal stem cells may alleviate angiotensin II-induced myocardial fibrosis and hypertrophy by upregulating SFRS3 expression.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The development of cardiac fibrosis (CF) and hypertrophy (CH) can lead to heart failure. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown promise in treating cardiac diseases. However, the relationship between MSCs and splicing factor arginine/serine rich-3 (SFRS3) remains unclear. In this study, our objectives are to investigate the effect of MSCs on SFRS3 expression, and their impact on CF and CH. Additionally, we aim to explore the function of the overexpression of SFRS3 in angiotensin II (Ang II)-treated cardiac fibroblasts (CFBs) and cardiac myocytes (CMCs). METHODS: Rat cardiac fibroblasts (rCFBs) or rat cardiac myocytes (rCMCs) were co-cultured with rat MSCs (rMSCs). The function of SFRS3 in Ang II-induced rCFBs and rCMCs was studied by overexpressing SFRS3 in these cells, both with and without the presence of rMSCs. We assessed the expression of SFRS3 and evaluated the cell cycle, proliferation and apoptosis of rCFBs and rCMCs. We also measured the levels of interleukin (IL)-ß, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and assessed the degree of fibrosis in rCFBs and hypertrophy in rCMCs. RESULTS: rMSCs induced SFRS3 expression and promoted cell cycle, proliferation, while reducing apoptosis of Ang II-treated rCFBs and rCMCs. Co-culture of rMSCs with these cells also repressed cytokine production and mitigated the fibrosis of rCFBs, as well as hypertrophy of rCMCs triggered by Ang II. Overexpression of SFRS3 in the rCFBs and rCMCs yielded identical effects to rMSC co-culture. CONCLUSION: MSCs may alleviate Ang II-induced cardiac fibrosis and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy by increasing SFRS3 expression in vitro.

Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid in acute coronary syndrome. Design of the clinical trial ES-BempeDACS.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Only about 1 out of every 3 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values <55mg/dL in the first year. The present study aims to evaluate the impact of early intensive therapy on lipid control after an AMI. METHODS: An independent, prospective, pragmatic, controlled, randomized, open-label, evaluator-blinded clinical trial (PROBE design) will analyze the efficacy and safety of an oral lipid-lowering triple therapy: high-potency statin+bempedoic acid (BA) 180mg+ezetimibe (EZ) 10mg versus current European-based guidelines (high-potency statin±EZ 10mg), in AMI patients. LDL-C will be determined within the first 48hours. Patients with LDL-C ≥ 115mg/dL (without previous statin therapy), ≥ 100mg/dL (with previous low-potency or high-potency statin therapy at submaximal dose), or ≥ 70mg/dL (with previous high-potency statin therapy at high dose) will be randomly assigned 1:1 between 24 and 72hours post-AMI to the BA/EZ combination or to statin±EZ, without BA. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients reaching LDL-C <55mg/dL at 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: The results of this study will provide novel information for post-AMI LDL-C control by evaluating the usefulness of an early intensive lipid-lowering strategy based on triple oral therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Early intensive lipid-lowering triple oral therapy vs the treatment recommended by current clinical practice guidelines could facilitate the achievement of optimal LDL-C levels in the first 2 months after AMI (a high-risk period). IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2021-006550-31.

Infarto agudo de miocardio en el paciente con marcapasos / Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Patient with Pacemaker

Resumen El diagnóstico electrocardiográfico de infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM) en el paciente con marcapasos siempre ha sido un problema en la práctica clínica, provocando retrasos en el manejo y peores desenlaces clínicos. Aunque el bloqueo completo de rama izquierda (BCRI) y la estimulación del ventrículo derecho pueden producir anomalías en el electrocardiograma (ECG), cambios morfológicos específicos a menudo permiten el diagnóstico de IAM o un infarto antiguo. Reporte de caso: Paciente de 76 años con antecedente de implante de marcapasos definitivo por bloqueo auriculoventricular de 3° grado, que ingresó por dolor precordial. A su ingreso hemodinámicamente estable, pero con ECG que muestra ritmo de marcapasos con BCRI cumpliendo Sgarbossa 2 puntos (elevación discordante del segmento ST > 5 mm en derivaciones V1 a V3) y relación ST/S < -0.25 en derivaciones V3-V4. Laboratorios con elevación de troponinas, integrándose diagnóstico de IAM y pasando a angiografía coronaria urgente. Se documentó lesión en arteria coronaria descendente anterior y se implantó stent liberador de fármaco angiográficamente exitoso. Se egresó estable, asintomático y con manejo farmacológico para prevención secundaria. Conclusión: La identificación por ECG de un IAM en pacientes portadores de marcapasos es fundamental para iniciar terapia de reperfusión. Las recomendaciones de las guías cambian constantemente, pero un algoritmo que utiliza la inestabilidad hemodinámica y los criterios de Sgarbossa modificados (CSM) para decidir el manejo de estos pacientes pudiera ser una herramienta con una alta sensibilidad y permitirá a los médicos tener la mejor toma de decisiones sin esperar resultados de laboratorio. Los CSM, que son más sensibles que los criterios originales, continúan siendo útiles en el diagnóstico de IAM. Los médicos deben elegir cuidadosamente el límite de CSM apropiado (relación ST/T -0.20 y -0.25) de acuerdo con cada caso.

Abstract The electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with pacemakers has always been a problem in clinical practice, causing delays in management and worse clinical outcomes. Although complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) and right ventricular pacing can produce electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, specific morphological changes often allow the diagnosis of AMI or an old infarction. Case report: A 76-year-old patient with history of permanent pacemaker implantation due to a 3rd-degree atrioventricular block was admitted for chest pain. Upon admission, he was hemodynamically stable but with ECG showing pacemaker rhythm with LBBB fulfilling 2 points of Sgarbossa criteria (discordant elevation of the ST segment > 5 mm in leads V1 to V3) and ST/S ratio < -0.25 in leads V3-V4. Laboratories showed elevated troponins, integrating diagnosis of AMI, and moving on to urgent coronary angiography. A lesion on the anterior descending coronary artery was documented, and a drug-eluting stent was successfully implanted. The patient was discharged stable, asymptomatic, and with pharmacological management for secondary prevention. Conclusion: ECG identification of an AMI in patients with pacemakers is essential to initiate reperfusion therapy. Guideline recommendations are constantly changing, but an algorithm that uses hemodynamic instability and the modified Sgarbossa criteria (MSC) to decide these patients' management could be a high-sensitivity tool and allow physicians to make the best decisions without waiting for laboratory results. MSC, which are more sensitive than the original criteria, continue to be helpful in the diagnosis of AMI. Clinicians should carefully choose the appropriate MSC cut-off (ST/T Ratio -0.20 and -0.25) on a case-by-case basis.

Documento de posición para la mejora en la reperfusión del infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del ST en Latinoamérica / Position statement for improvement in reperfusion of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Latin America

Resumen El tratamiento del infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST tiene barreras dependiendo de la región geográfica. La angioplastia coronaria primaria es el tratamiento de elección, siempre y cuando sea realizada dentro de tiempo y por operadores experimentados. Sin embargo, cuando no está disponible, la administración de fibrinólisis y el envío para angioplastia de rescate, en caso de reperfusión negativa, es la mejor estrategia. De la misma manera, la angioplastia coronaria, como parte de una estrategia farmacoinvasiva, es la mejor alternativa cuando hay reperfusión positiva. El desarrollo de redes de tratamiento del infarto aumenta el número de pacientes reperfundidos dentro de los tiempos recomendados y mejora los desenlaces. En América Latina, los programas nacionales para el tratamiento del infarto deben centrarse en mejorar los resultados y el éxito a largo plazo depende de trabajar hacia objetivos definidos y obtener métricas de rendimiento, por lo tanto, estos deben desarrollar métricas para cuantificar su desempeño. El siguiente documento discute todas estas alternativas y sugiere oportunidades de mejora.

Abstract The treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction has barriers depending on the geographic region. Primary coronary angioplasty is the treatment of choice, if it is performed on time and by experienced operators. However, when it is not available, the administration of fibrinolysis and referral for rescue angioplasty, in case of negative reperfusion, is the best strategy. In the same way, coronary angioplasty, as part of a pharmacoinvasive strategy, is the best alternative when there is positive reperfusion. The development of infarct treatment networks increases the number of patients reperfused within the recommended times and improves outcomes. In Latin America, national myocardial infarction treatment programs should focus on improving outcomes, and long-term success depends on working toward defined goals and enhancing functionality, therefore programs should develop capacity to measure their performance. The following document discusses all of these alternatives and suggests opportunities for improvement.

Latin-American guidelines of recommendations at discharge from an acute coronary syndrome.

The diagnostic criteria, treatments at the time of admission, and drugs used in patients with acute coronary syndrome are well defined in countless guidelines. However, there is uncertainty about the measures to recommend during patient discharge planning. This document brings together the most recent evidence and the standardized and optimal treatment for patients at the time of discharge from hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome, for comprehensive and safe care in the patient's transition between care from the acute event to the outpatient care, with the aim of optimizing the recovery of viable myocardium, guaranteeing the most appropriate secondary prevention, reducing the risk of a new coronary event and mortality, as well as the adequate reintegration of patients into daily life.

Los criterios diagnósticos, los tratamientos en el momento de la admisión y los fármacos utilizados en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo están bien definidos en innumerables guías. Sin embargo, existe incertidumbre acerca de las medidas para recomendar durante la planificación del egreso de los pacientes. Este documento reúne las evidencias más recientes y el tratamiento estandarizado y óptimo para los pacientes al momento del egreso de una hospitalización por un síndrome coronario agudo, para un cuidado integral y seguro en la transición del paciente entre la atención del evento agudo y el cuidado ambulatorio, con el objetivo de optimizar la recuperación de miocardio viable, garantizar la prevención secundaria más adecuada, reducir el riesgo de un nuevo evento coronario y la mortalidad, así como la adecuada reinserción de los pacientes en la vida cotidiana.

Timing of multivessel revascularization in stable patients with STEMI: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) is recommended in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) without cardiogenic shock. The present network meta-analysis investigated the optimal timing of MV-PCI in this context. METHODS: We pooled the aggregated data from randomized trials investigating stable STEMI patients with multivessel CAD treated with a strategy of either MV-PCI or culprit vessel-only PCI. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The main secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. RESULTS: Among 11 trials, a total of 10 507 patients were randomly assigned to MV-PCI (same sitting, n=1683; staged during the index hospitalization, n=3460; staged during a subsequent hospitalization within 45 days, n=3275) or to culprit vessel-only PCI (n=2089). The median follow-up was 18.6 months. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, MV-PCI staged during the index hospitalization significantly reduced all-cause death (risk ratio, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.56-0.92; P=.008) and ranked as possibly the best treatment option for this outcome compared with all other strategies. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, a MV-PCI reduced cardiovascular mortality without differences dependent on the timing of revascularization. MV-PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, significantly reduced myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, with no significant difference between each other. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD without cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, represents the safest and most efficacious approach. The different timings of multivessel PCI did not result in any significant differences in all-cause death. This study is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023457794).

El shock cardiogénico como problema de salud. Fisiología, clasificación y detección / Cardiogenic shock as a health issue: Physiology, classification, and detection

El shock cardiogénico (SC) es un síndrome heterogéneo con elevada mortalidad y creciente incidencia. Se trata de una situación en la que existe un desequilibrio entre las necesidades tisulares de oxígeno y la capacidad del sistema cardiovascular para satisfacerlas debido a una disfunción cardiaca aguda. Históricamente, los síndromes coronarios agudos han sido la causa principal de SC; sin embargo, los casos no isquémicos han aumentado en incidencia. Su fisiopatología implica el daño isquémico del miocardio, una respuesta tanto simpática como del sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona e inflamatoria, que perpetúan la situación de hipoperfusión tisular conduciendo finalmente a la disfunción multiorgánica. La caracterización de los pacientes con SC mediante una valoración triaxial y la universalización de la escala SCAI ha permitido una estandarización de la estratificación de la gravedad del SC que, sumada a la detección precoz y el enfoque Hub and Spoke, podrían contribuir a mejorar el pronóstico de los pacientes en SC. (AU)

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogeneous syndrome with high mortality and increasing incidence. It is a condition where there is an imbalance between tissue oxygen demands and the cardiovascular system's capacity to meet them due to acute cardiac dysfunction. Historically, acute coronary syndromes have been the primary cause of CS; however, non-ischemic cases have seen a rise in incidence. Its pathophysiology involves myocardial ischemic damage, a sympathetic, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, and inflammatory response, perpetuating the situation of tissue hypoperfusion, ultimately leading to multiorgan dysfunction. Characterizing CS patients through a triaxial assessment and the widespread use of the SCAI scale has allowed standardization of CS severity stratification, which, coupled with early detection and the “Hub and Spoke” approach, could contribute to improve the prognosis of CS patients. (AU)

Stasis imaging predicts the risk of cardioembolic events related to acute myocardial infarction: the ISBITAMI study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: In the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), imaging-based biomarkers could be useful for guiding oral anticoagulation to prevent cardioembolism. Our objective was to test the efficacy of intraventricular blood stasis imaging for predicting a composite primary endpoint of cardioembolic risk during the first 6 months after STEMI. METHODS: We designed a prospective clinical study, Imaging Silent Brain Infarct in Acute Myocardial Infarction (ISBITAMI), including patients with a first STEMI, an ejection fraction ≤ 45% and without atrial fibrillation to assess the performance of stasis metrics to predict cardioembolism. Patients underwent ultrasound-based stasis imaging at enrollment followed by heart and brain magnetic resonance at 1-week and 6-month visits. From the stasis maps, we calculated the average residence time, RT, of blood inside the left ventricle and assessed its performance to predict the primary endpoint. The longitudinal strain of the 4 apical segments was quantified by speckle tracking. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were assigned to the primary endpoint. Of them, 17 patients had 1 or more events: 3 strokes, 5 silent brain infarctions, and 13 mural thromboses. No systemic embolisms were observed. RT (OR, 3.73; 95%CI, 1.75-7.9; P<.001) and apical strain (OR, 1.47; 95%CI, 1.13-1.92; P=.004) showed complementary prognostic value. The bivariate model showed a c-index=0.86 (95%CI, 0.73-0.95), a negative predictive value of 1.00 (95%CI, 0.94-1.00), and positive predictive value of 0.45 (95%CI, 0.37-0.77). The results were confirmed in a multiple imputation sensitivity analysis. Conventional ultrasound-based metrics were of limited predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in sinus rhythm, the risk of cardioembolism may be assessed by echocardiography by combining stasis and strain imaging. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02917213).

Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: revascularization strategy according to ischemic territory.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The association of revascularization strategy with clinical outcomes according to the ischemic territory of nonculprit lesion has not been documented in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). This study aimed to compare outcomes between culprit-only and immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to ischemic territory in patients with AMI-CS. METHODS: A total of 536 patients with AMI-CS and multivessel disease from the SMART-RESCUE registry were categorized according to ischemic territory (nonculprit left main/proximal left anterior descending artery [LM/pLAD] vs culprit LM/pLAD vs no LM/pLAD). The primary outcome was a patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) consisting of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, rehospitalization due to heart failure, or repeat revascularization at 1 year. RESULTS: Among the total population, 108 patients had nonculprit LM/pLAD, 228 patients had culprit LM/pLAD, and 200 patients had no LM/pLAD, with the risk of POCE being higher in patients with large ischemic territory lesions (53.6% vs 53.4% vs 39.6%; P = .02). Multivessel PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of POCE compared with culprit-only PCI in patients with nonculprit LM/pLAD (40.7% vs 66.9%; HR, 0.52; 95%CI, 0.29-0.91; P=.02), but not in those with culprit LM/pLAD (P=.46) or no LM/pLAD (P=.47). A significant interaction existed between revascularization strategy and large nonculprit ischemic territory (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Large ischemic territory involvement was associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with AMI-CS and multivessel disease. Immediate multivessel PCI might improve clinical outcomes in patients with a large nonculprit ischemic burden.

Impact of previous percutaneous coronary intervention on angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if previous PCI in patients with STEMI increases the risk of major cardiovascular events, and if final epicardial blood flow differs according to the reperfusion strategy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, longitudinal, comparative sub-study of the PHASE-MX trial that included patients with STEMI and reperfusion within 12 hours of symptom onset, who were classified according to their history of PCI. The occurrence of the composite primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, re-infarction, congestive heart failure and cardiogenic shock) within 30 days was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. Epicardial blood flow was assessed using the TIMI grading system after reperfusion. RESULTS: A total of 935 patients were included; 85.6% were males and 6.9% had a history of PCI; 53% underwent pharmacoinvasive therapy, and 47%, primary PCI. The incidence of the composite primary endpoint at 30 days in patients with a history of PCI was 9.8% vs 13.3% in those with no previous PCI (p = 0.06). Among the patients with previous PCI, 87.1% reached a final TIMI grade 3 flow after primary PCI vs. 75% in the group with pharmacoinvasive strategy (p = 0.235). CONCLUSIONS: A history of PCI does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events at 30 days; however, it impacted negatively on the final angiographic blood flow of patients that received pharmacoinvasive therapy (compared to primary PCI).

ANTECEDENTES: El pronóstico de los pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST (IAMCEST) y antecedente de intervención coronaria percutánea (ICP) es incierto. Objetivos: Evaluar si la ICP previa en pacientes con IAMCEST incrementa el riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares mayores y si el flujo final epicárdico varía según la estrategia de reperfusión. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Subestudio de PHASE-MX, observacional, longitudinal y comparativo, de pacientes con IAMCEST reperfundidos en menos de 12 horas de iniciados los síntomas, divididos conforme el antecedente de ICP. El acaecimiento del criterio de valoración principal (muerte cardiovascular, reinfarto, insuficiencia cardíaca y choque cardiogénico) dentro de los 30 días se comparó con estimaciones de Kaplan-Meier, prueba de rangos logarítmicos y modelo de riesgos proporcionales de Cox. El flujo epicárdico final se evaluó con el sistema de clasificación del flujo TIMI después de la reperfusión. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 935 pacientes, 85.6 % del sexo masculino, 6.9 % de los cuales tenía antecedente de ICP; 53 % recibió terapia farmacoinvasiva y 47 %, ICP primaria. La incidencia del criterio de valoración principal en pacientes con ICP previa fue de 9.8 % versus 13.3 % en aquellos sin ese antecedente (p = 0.06); 87.1 % de los pacientes con ICP previa obtuvo flujo final de grado TIMI 3 versus 75 % del grupo con estrategia farmacoinvasiva (p = 0.235). CONCLUSIONES: El antecedente de ICP no incrementa el riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares mayores a los 30 días en pacientes con IAMCEST; sin embargo, impacta negativamente en el flujo sanguíneo angiográfico final de los pacientes que recibieron terapia farmacoinvasiva (en comparación con ICP primaria).

Caracterización del infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento st en pacientes atendidos en un centro de referencia. Periodo 2021-2023

Introducción: el riesgo de aparición del infarto agudo de miocardio está relacionada con varias comorbilidades, muchas de las cuales son prevenibles y tratables. El infarto agudo de miocardio tiene un impacto relevante en términos de mortalidad y número de hospitalizaciones. Objetivos: determinar las características clínica-epidemiológicas del infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST en pacientes atendidos en el Centro Médico Nacional-Hospital Nacional, durante el periodo 2021-2023. Metodología: el diseño del estudio fue observacional, descriptivo de corte transversal, sobre las características clínica-epidemiológicas del infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST en pacientes mayores de edad atendidos en el Centro Médico Nacional-Hospital Nacional, durante el periodo 2021-2023. Resultados: se analizaron 102 expedientes de pacientes con diagnóstico de infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST con una media de 64 ± 12 años; el 68 % (n = 69) correspondió al sexo masculino, con una edad promedio de 62 años, y en relación a las mujeres el promedio fue de 64 años. El motivo de consulta principal fue el dolor precordial y la cara miocárdica más afectada de acuerdo con el electrocardiograma inicial fue la cara anteroseptal. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue del 16 %, el 68 % correspondió a varones. La comorbilidad más frecuente fue la hipertensión arterial. Conclusión: La hipertensión arterial es la patología más prevalente. Asimismo, son habituales la obesidad, el tabaquismo y la diabetes mellitus. Las comorbilidades están en relación directa con la edad y prevalecen en mayores de 60 años. El infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST es más frecuente en el sexo masculino.

Introduction: the risk of acute myocardial infarction is related to several comorbidities, many of which are preventable and treatable. Acute myocardial infarction has a relevant impact in terms of mortality and number of hospitalizations. Objectives: the design of the study was observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, on the clinical characteristics of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, in adult patients treated at the Centro Médico Nacional-Hospital Nacional, during the period 2021-2023. Methodology: the design of the study was observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, on the clinical-epidemiological characteristics of acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation in adult patients treated at the National Medical Center-National Hospital, during the period 2021-2023. Results: 102 records of patients with a diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with a mean age of 64 ± 12 years were analyzed; 68 % (n = 69) were male, with an average age of 62 years, and in relation to women the average was 64 years. The main reason for consultation was precordial pain and the most affected myocardial aspect according to the initial electrocardiogram was the anteroseptal aspect. In-hospital mortality was 16 %, 68 % of which were men. The most frequent comorbidity was arterial hypertension. Conclusion: high blood pressure is the most prevalent pathology. Likewise, obesity, smoking and diabetes mellitus are common. Comorbidities are directly related to age and prevail in those over 60 years of age. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is more common in males.

Elementos precondicionantes de complicaciones cardiacas en el paciente diabético con infarto agudo de miocardio / Preconditioning elements of cardiac complications among patients with diabetes and acute myocardial infarction

RESUMEN Objetivo: Identificar factores de riesgo, basados en los parámetros clínicos, ecocardiográficos y terapéuticos, para predecir complicaciones cardiacas en pacientes diabéticos con infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM). Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, analítico, de casos y controles en el Centro de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Cardiología Santiago de Cuba, adjunto al Hospital Provincial Saturnino Lora, durante el periodo comprendido entre los años 2019 y 2021. La muestra quedó constituida por 266 pacientes, elegidos por muestreo aleatorio simple 1:2. Las variables de estudio se agruparon en demográficas, clínico-ecocardiográficas y terapéuticas. Se realizó el análisis multivariado con todas las variables que constituyeron factores de riesgo; se empleó el análisis de la varianza unidireccional y la regresión logística binaria. Resultados: Las complicaciones más frecuentes fueron la fibrilación auricular y la insuficiencia cardiaca en un 12 %, aproximadamente. Las cifras de control metabólico mostraron alteración al ingreso (OR = 6,92; LI: 2,61; LS: 18,32; p = 0,001). El análisis univariado demostró que diez factores incrementaron el riesgo de presentar complicaciones, entre ellos, el diagnóstico de diabetes mellitus ≥10 años (OR = 2,50; LI: 1,14; LS: 5,45; p = 0,020); además, el análisis multivariado reveló que la edad ≥60 años (OR = 5,624; IC = 1,607-19,686; p = 0,007), el control metabólico al ingreso alterado (OR = 5,245; IC = 1,491-18,447; p = 0,010), la no aplicación de terapia trombolítica (OR = 5,74; IC = 1,46-22,586; p = 0,012), la FEVI ≤ 40 % (OR = 5,245; IC = 1,17-23,433; p = 0,030), la presión de la aurícula izquierda ≥15 mmHg (OR = 12,335; IC = 3,45-44,08; p = 0,001) y la motilidad ≥1,5 puntos (OR = 4,702; IC = 1,258-17,575; p = 0,021) incrementaron el riesgo de forma independiente. Conclusiones: El estudio demostró el valor de seis factores de riesgo de complicaciones cardiacas en el paciente diabético con IAM, donde sobresale el control glucémico al ingreso, la fracción de eyección disminuida del ventrículo izquierdo, la presión de la aurícula izquierda aumentada y la no terapia de reperfusión coronaria.

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the risk factors based on clinical, echocardiographic and therapeutic parameters which predict the development of cardiac complications among patients with diabetes and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Materials and methods: An observational, analytical, case-control study was conducted at Centro de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular de Santiago de Cuba, attached to Hospital Provincial Saturnino Lora, from 2019 to 2021. The sample consisted of 266 patients, chosen by simple random sampling 1:2. The study included demographic, clinical- echocardiographic and therapeutic variables. A multivariate analysis was performed with all the variables considered as risk factors; one-way analysis of variance and binary logistic regression were used. Results: The most frequent cardiac complications were atrial fibrillation and heart failure (approximately 12 %). A metabolic control analysis on admission yielded altered results (OR = 6.92; LI: 2.61; LS: 18.32; p = 0.001). The univariate analysis showed that ten factors increased the risk of complications, including the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus ≥ 10 years (OR = 2.50; LI: 1.14; LS: 5.45; p = 0.020). On the other hand, the multivariate analysis revealed six factors that predict the development of cardiac complications: age ≥ 60 years (OR = 5.624; CI = 1.607-19.686; p = 0.007), altered metabolic control on admission (OR = 5.245; CI = 1.491-18.447; p = 0.010), lack of use of thrombolytic therapy (OR = 5.74; CI = 1.46-22.586; p = 0.012), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40 % (OR = 5.245; CI = 1.17-23.433; p = 0.030), left atrial pressure ≥ 15 mmHg (OR = 12.335; CI = 3.45-44.08; p = 0.001) and motility ≥ 1.5 points (OR = 4.702; CI = 1.258-17.575; p = 0.021). Conclusions: The study demonstrated the value of six risk factors of cardiac complications among patients with diabetes and AMI, where glycemic control on admission, decreased LVEF, increased left atrial pressure and no reperfusion therapy stand out.

O Valor Preditivo do Índice Prognóstico Inflamatório para Detecção de No-Reflow em Pacientes com Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnivelamento do Segmento ST / The Predictive Value of the Inflammatory Prognostic Index for Detecting No-Reflow in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Resumo Fundamento: O no-reflow (NR) é caracterizado por uma redução aguda no fluxo coronário que não é acompanhada por espasmo coronário, trombose ou dissecção. O índice prognóstico inflamatório (IPI) é um novo marcador que foi relatado como tendo um papel prognóstico em pacientes com câncer e é calculado pela razão neutrófilos/linfócitos (NLR) multiplicada pela razão proteína C reativa/albumina. Objetivo: Nosso objetivo foi investigar a relação entre IPI e NR em pacientes com infarto do miocárdio com supradesnivelamento do segmento ST (IAMCSST) submetidos a intervenção coronária percutânea primária (ICPp). Métodos: Um total de 1.541 pacientes foram incluídos neste estudo (178 com NR e 1.363 com refluxo). A regressão penalizada LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Select Operator) foi usada para seleção de variáveis. Foi criado um nomograma baseado no IPI para detecção do risco de desenvolvimento de NR. A validação interna com reamostragem Bootstrap foi utilizada para reprodutibilidade do modelo. Um valor de p bilateral <0,05 foi aceito como nível de significância para análises estatísticas. Resultados: O IPI foi maior em pacientes com NR do que em pacientes com refluxo. O IPI esteve associado de forma não linear com a NR. O IPI apresentou maior capacidade discriminativa do que o índice de imunoinflamação sistêmica, NLR e relação PCR/albumina. A adição do IPI ao modelo de regressão logística multivariável de base melhorou a discriminação e o efeito do benefício clínico líquido do modelo para detecção de pacientes com NR, e o IPI foi a variável mais proeminente no modelo completo. Foi criado um nomograma baseado no IPI para prever o risco de NR. A validação interna do nomograma Bootstrap mostrou uma boa capacidade de calibração e discriminação. Conclusão: Este é o primeiro estudo que mostra a associação de IPI com NR em pacientes com IAMCSST submetidos a ICPp.

Abstract Background: No-reflow (NR) is characterized by an acute reduction in coronary flow that is not accompanied by coronary spasm, thrombosis, or dissection. Inflammatory prognostic index (IPI) is a novel marker that was reported to have a prognostic role in cancer patients and is calculated by neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) multiplied by C-reactive protein/albumin ratio. Objective: We aimed to investigate the relationship between IPI and NR in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Methods: A total of 1541 patients were enrolled in this study (178 with NR and 1363 with reflow). Lasso panelized shrinkage was used for variable selection. A nomogram was created based on IPI for detecting the risk of NR development. Internal validation with Bootstrap resampling was used for model reproducibility. A two-sided p-value <0.05 was accepted as a significance level for statistical analyses. Results: IPI was higher in patients with NR than in patients with reflow. IPI was non-linearly associated with NR. IPI had a higher discriminative ability than the systemic immune-inflammation index, NLR, and CRP/albumin ratio. Adding IPI to the baseline multivariable logistic regression model improved the discrimination and net-clinical benefit effect of the model for detecting NR patients, and IPI was the most prominent variable in the full model. A nomogram was created based on IPI to predict the risk of NR. Bootstrap internal validation of nomogram showed a good calibration and discrimination ability. Conclusion: This is the first study that shows the association of IPI with NR in STEMI patients who undergo pPCI.