Effectiveness of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation to Enhance Upper Extremity Recovery after Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: To first investigate the effectiveness of modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) in low-functioning patients with stroke (PwS). Second, we aimed to investigate the efficiency of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), applied on intermittent days, in addition to the mCIMT in PwS. DESIGN: Randomized, sham-controlled, single-blinded study. SETTING: Outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen PwS (age 66.3 ± 9.2 years (mean ± SD); 53% female) who were in the first 1-12 months after the incident were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: PwS were divided into 3 groups: 1) mCIMT alone, 2) mCIMT + sham iTBS, and 3) mCIMT + iTBS. Each group received fifteen sessions of mCIMT (1 hour/session, 3 sessions/week). iTBS was applied with 600-pulses on impaired M1 prior to mCIMT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Upper extremity (UE) impairment was assessed with the Fugl-Meyer Test (FMT-UE), while the motor function was evaluated with the Wolf-Motor Function Test (WMFT). Motor Activity Log-28 (MAL-28) was used to evaluate the amount of use (AUS) and how well (HWS) the impaired UE movements. RESULTS: With-in-group analysis revealed that all groups had statistically significant improvements based on the FMT-UE and MAL-28 (p<0.05). However, the performance time and arm strength variables of WMFT were only increased in the mCIMT + iTBS group (p<0.05). The only between-group difference was observed in the intracortical facilitation in favor of the mCIMT + iTBS group (p<0.05). The effect size of iTBS was f=0.18. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that mCIMT with and without the application of iTBS has increased the UE motor function in low-functioning PwS. iTBS applied on intermittent days may have additional benefits as an adjunct therapy for facilitating cortical excitability, increasing the speed and strength of the impaired UE as well as decreasing disability.

A Prospective Look at the Prevalence of Setup Electrode-Swap Errors Across Over 450 Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Cases.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is shown to be useful in surgeries when the nervous system is at risk. Its success in part relies upon proper setup of often dozens of electrodes correctly placed and secured upon patients and inserted in specific stimulating and recording receptacles. Given the complicated setups and the demanding operating room environment, errors in setup are bound to occur. These have led to false negatives associated with new patient morbidities including, at times, paralysis. No studies quantify the prevalence of these types of setup errors. Approximately 800,000 operations annually utilize intraoperative neuromonitoring in the US alone, so even a small percentage of errors suggests clinical significance. In addition, these types of errors hinder the overall effectiveness of IONM and may result in lower reported sensitivities and lower cost-effectiveness of this important service. We sought to discover through a prospective study and verification through chart review the prevalence of "electrode-swap" errors (when recording and/or stimulating electrodes are incorrectly placed on the patient or in the IONM equipment during setup) across all procedures monitored. We found recording and/or stimulating electrode set up errors in 24 of 454 cases (5.3%). These data and examples of how errors were discovered intraoperatively are reported. We also offer techniques to help reduce this error rate. This study demonstrates a significant potential avoidable error in IONM diagnostic utility, patient outcome, and sensitivity/specificity of alert criteria. The value of identifying and correcting these errors is consequential, multifaceted, and far-reaching.

Tactile versus motor imagery: differences in corticospinal excitability assessed with single-pulse TMS.

Tactile Imagery (TI) remains a fairly understudied phenomenon despite growing attention to this topic in recent years. Here, we investigated the effects of TI on corticospinal excitability by measuring motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The effects of TI were compared with those of tactile stimulation (TS) and kinesthetic motor imagery (kMI). Twenty-two participants performed three tasks in randomly assigned order: imagine finger tapping (kMI); experience vibratory sensations in the middle finger (TS); and mentally reproduce the sensation of vibration (TI). MEPs increased during both kMI and TI, with a stronger increase for kMI. No statistically significant change in MEP was observed during TS. The demonstrated differential effects of kMI, TI and TS on corticospinal excitability have practical implications for devising the imagery-based and TS-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), particularly the ones intended to improve neurorehabilitation by evoking plasticity changes in sensorimotor circuitry.

Neuromodulatory Responses Elicited by Intermittent versus Continuous Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in Rats.

Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulation technique that delivers acoustic energy with high spatial resolution for inducing long-term potentiation (LTP)- or depression (LTD)-like plasticity. The variability in the primary effects of tFUS-induced plasticity could be due to different stimulation patterns, such as intermittent versus continuous, and is an aspect that requires further detailed exploration. In this study, we developed a platform to evaluate the neuromodulatory effects of intermittent and continuous tFUS on motor cortical plasticity before and after tFUS application. Three groups of rats were exposed to either intermittent, continuous, or sham tFUS. We analyzed the neuromodulatory effects on motor cortical excitability by examining changes in motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We also investigated the effects of different stimulation patterns on excitatory and inhibitory neural biomarkers, examining c-Fos and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD-65) expression using immunohistochemistry staining. Additionally, we evaluated the safety of tFUS by analyzing glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression. The current results indicated that intermittent tFUS produced a facilitation effect on motor excitability, while continuous tFUS significantly inhibited motor excitability. Furthermore, neither tFUS approach caused injury to the stimulation sites in rats. Immunohistochemistry staining revealed increased c-Fos and decreased GAD-65 expression following intermittent tFUS. Conversely, continuous tFUS downregulated c-Fos and upregulated GAD-65 expression. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that both intermittent and continuous tFUS effectively modulate cortical excitability. The neuromodulatory effects may result from the activation or deactivation of cortical neurons following tFUS intervention. These effects are considered safe and well-tolerated, highlighting the potential for using different patterns of tFUS in future clinical neuromodulatory applications.

Investigating the Working Mechanism of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used to modulate neuronal activity, but the exact mechanism of action (MOA) is unclear. This study investigates tDCS-induced modulation of the corticospinal excitability and the underlying MOA. By anesthetizing the scalp before applying tDCS and by stimulating the cheeks, we investigated whether stimulation of peripheral and/or cranial nerves contributes to the effects of tDCS on corticospinal excitability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized cross-over study, four experimental conditions with anodal direct current stimulation were compared in 19 healthy volunteers: 1) tDCS over the motor cortex (tDCS-MI), 2) tDCS over the motor cortex with a locally applied topical anesthetic (TA) on the scalp (tDCS-MI + TA), 3) DCS over the cheek region (DCS-C), and 4) sham tDCS over the motor cortex(sham). tDCS was applied for 20 minutes at 1 mA. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured before tDCS and immediately, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after tDCS. A questionnaire was used to assess the tolerability of tDCS. RESULTS: A significant MEP amplitude increase compared with baseline was found 30 minutes after tDCS-MI, an effect still observed 60 minutes later; no time∗condition interaction effect was detected. In the other three conditions (tDCS-MI + TA, DCS-C, sham), no significant MEP modulation was found. The questionnaire indicated that side effects are significantly lower when the local anesthetic was applied before stimulation than in the other three conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The significant MEP amplitude increase observed from 30 minutes on after tDCS-MI supports the modulatory effect of tDCS on corticospinal neurotransmission. This effect lasted one hour after stimulation. The absence of a significant modulation when a local anesthetic was applied suggests that effects of tDCS are not solely established through direct cortical stimulation but that stimulation of peripheral and/or cranial nerves also might contribute to tDCS-induced modulation.

Motor-evoked potentials in the human upper and lower limb do not increase after single 30-min sessions of acute intermittent hypoxia.

Acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) can induce sustained facilitation of motor output in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Most studies of corticospinal tract excitability in humans have used 9% fraction inspired oxygen ([Formula: see text]) AIH (AIH-9%), with inconsistent outcomes. We investigated the effect of single sessions of 9% [Formula: see text] and 12% [Formula: see text] AIH (AIH-12%) on corticospinal excitability of a hand and leg muscle in able-bodied adults. Ten naïve participants completed three sessions on separate days comprising 15 epochs of 1 min of AIH-9%, AIH-12%, or sham (SHAM-21%) followed by 1 min of room air (21% [Formula: see text]) in a randomized crossover design. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs; n = 30, ∼1 mV) elicited at rest by transcranial magnetic stimulation and maximal M-waves (Mmax) evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation were measured from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles at baseline and at ∼0, 20, 40, and 60 min post intervention. AIH-9% induced the greatest reduction in peripheral oxygen saturation (to 85% vs. 93% and 100% in AIH-12% and SHAM-21%, respectively; P < 0.001) and the greatest increase in ventilation [by 22% vs. 12% and -3% in AIH-9%, AIH-12%, and SHAM-21%, respectively (P < 0.001)]. There was no difference in MEP amplitudes (%Mmax) after any of the three conditions (AIH-9%, AIH-12%, SHAM-21%) for both the FDI (P = 0.399) and TA (P = 0.582). Despite greater cardiorespiratory changes during AIH-9%, there was no evidence of corticospinal facilitation (tested with MEPs) in this study. Further studies could explore variability in response to AIH between individuals and other methods to measure motor facilitation in people with and without spinal cord injuries.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study that tests whether acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) induces motor output facilitation in humans after two different doses of AIH (9% and 12% [Formula: see text]) and the reproducibility of participant responses after a repeat AIH intervention at 9% AIH. There was no motor output facilitation in response to either dose of AIH. The results question the effectiveness of a single 30-min session of AIH in inducing motor output facilitation, tested in this way.

Motor function in multiple sclerosis assessed by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping.

INTRODUCTION: Impaired motor function is a major cause of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS), involving various neuroplasticity processes typically assessed by neuroimaging. This study aimed to determine whether navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) could also provide biomarkers of motor cortex plasticity in patients with MS (pwMS). METHODS: nTMS motor mapping was performed for hand and leg muscles bilaterally. nTMS variables included the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), corticospinal excitability measures, and the size of cortical motor maps (CMMs). Clinical assessment included disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale, EDSS), strength (MRC scale, pinch and grip), and dexterity (9-hole Pegboard Test). RESULTS: nTMS motor mapping was performed in 68 pwMS. PwMS with high disability (EDSS ≥ 3) had enlarged CMMs with less dense distribution of MEPs and various MEP parameter changes compared to pwMS with low disability (EDSS < 3). Patients with progressive MS had also various MEP parameter changes compared to pwMS with relapsing remitting form. MRC score correlated positively with MEP amplitude and negatively with MEP latency, pinch strength correlated negatively with CMM volume and dexterity with MEP latency. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to perform 4-limb cortical motor mapping in pwMS using a dedicated nTMS procedure. By quantifying the cortical surface representation of a given muscle and the variability of MEP within this representation, nTMS can provide new biomarkers of motor function impairment in pwMS. Our study opens perspectives for the use of nTMS as an objective method for assessing pwMS disability in clinical practice.

Timing-dependent synergies between motor cortex and posterior spinal stimulation in humans.

Volitional movement requires descending input from the motor cortex and sensory feedback through the spinal cord. We previously developed a paired brain and spinal electrical stimulation approach in rats that relies on convergence of the descending motor and spinal sensory stimuli in the cervical cord. This approach strengthened sensorimotor circuits and improved volitional movement through associative plasticity. In humans, it is not known whether posterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted at the sensorimotor interface or anterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted within the motor system is effective at facilitating brain evoked responses. In 59 individuals undergoing elective cervical spine decompression surgery, the motor cortex was stimulated with scalp electrodes and the spinal cord was stimulated with epidural electrodes, with muscle responses being recorded in arm and leg muscles. Spinal electrodes were placed either posteriorly or anteriorly, and the interval between cortex and spinal cord stimulation was varied. Pairing stimulation between the motor cortex and spinal sensory (posterior) but not spinal motor (anterior) stimulation produced motor evoked potentials that were over five times larger than brain stimulation alone. This strong augmentation occurred only when descending motor and spinal afferent stimuli were timed to converge in the spinal cord. Paired stimulation also increased the selectivity of muscle responses relative to unpaired brain or spinal cord stimulation. Finally, clinical signs suggest that facilitation was observed in both injured and uninjured segments of the spinal cord. The large effect size of this paired stimulation makes it a promising candidate for therapeutic neuromodulation. KEY POINTS: Pairs of stimuli designed to alter nervous system function typically target the motor system, or one targets the sensory system and the other targets the motor system for convergence in cortex. In humans undergoing clinically indicated surgery, we tested paired brain and spinal cord stimulation that we developed in rats aiming to target sensorimotor convergence in the cervical cord. Arm and hand muscle responses to paired sensorimotor stimulation were more than five times larger than brain or spinal cord stimulation alone when applied to the posterior but not anterior spinal cord. Arm and hand muscle responses to paired stimulation were more selective for targeted muscles than the brain- or spinal-only conditions, especially at latencies that produced the strongest effects of paired stimulation. Measures of clinical evidence of compression were only weakly related to the paired stimulation effect, suggesting that it could be applied as therapy in people affected by disorders of the central nervous system.

Transabdominal motor evoked potential neuromonitoring of lumbosacral spine surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (TcMEPs) can improve intraoperative detection of femoral plexus and nerve root injury during lumbosacral spine surgery. However, even under ideal conditions, TcMEPs are not completely free of false-positive alerts due to the immobilizing effect of general anesthetics, especially in the proximal musculature. The application of transcutaneous stimulation to activate ventral nerve roots directly at the level of the conus medularis (bypassing the brain and spinal cord) has emerged as a method to potentially monitor the motor component of the femoral plexus and lumbosacral nerves free from the blunting effects of general anesthesia. PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and efficacy of transabdominal motor evoked potentials (TaMEPs) compared to TcMEPs during lumbosacral spine procedures. DESIGN: We present the findings of a single-center 12-month retrospective experience of all lumbosacral spine surgeries utilizing multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) consisting of TcMEPs, TaMEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), electromyography (EMG), and electroencephalography. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two hundred and twenty patients having one, or a combination of lumbosacral spine procedures, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), posterior spinal fusion (PSF), and/or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative neuromonitoring data was correlated to immediate post-operative neurologic examinations and chart review. METHODS: Baseline reliability, false positive rate, true positive rate, false negative rate, area under the curve at baseline and at alerts, and detection of pre-operative deficits of TcMEPs and TaMEPs were compared and analyzed for statistical significance. The relationship between transcutaneous stimulation voltage level and patient BMI was also examined. RESULTS: TaMEPs were significantly more reliable than TcMEPs in all muscles except abductor hallucis. Of the 27 false positive alerts, 24 were TcMEPs alone, and 3 were TaMEPs alone. Of the 19 true positives, none were detected by TcMEPs alone, 3 were detected by TaMEPs alone (TcMEPs were not present), and the remaining 16 true positives involved TaMEPs and TcMEPs. TaMEPs had a significantly larger area under the curve (AUC) at baseline than TcMEPs in all muscles except abductor hallucis. The percent decrease in TcMEP and TaMEP AUC during LLIF alerts was not significantly different. Both TcMEPs and TaMEPs reflected three pre-existing motor deficits. Patient BMI and TaMEP stimulation intensity were found to be moderately positively correlated. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the high reliability and predictability of TaMEPs and the potential added value when TaMEPs are incorporated into multimodality IONM during lumbosacral spine surgery.

Monitoring Changes in TMS-Evoked EEG and EMG Activity During 1†Hz rTMS of the Healthy Motor Cortex.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique capable of inducing neuroplasticity as measured by changes in peripheral muscle electromyography (EMG) or electroencephalography (EEG) from pre-to-post stimulation. However, temporal courses of neuromodulation during ongoing rTMS are unclear. Monitoring cortical dynamics via TMS-evoked responses using EMG (motor-evoked potentials; MEPs) and EEG (transcranial-evoked potentials; TEPs) during rTMS might provide further essential insights into its mode of action - temporal course of potential modulations. The objective of this study was to first evaluate the validity of online rTMS-EEG and rTMS-EMG analyses, and second to scrutinize the temporal changes of TEPs and MEPs during rTMS. As rTMS is subject to high inter-individual effect variability, we aimed for single-subject analyses of EEG changes during rTMS. Ten healthy human participants were stimulated with 1,000 pulses of 1 Hz rTMS over the motor cortex, while EEG and EMG were recorded continuously. Validity of MEPs and TEPs measured during rTMS was assessed in sensor and source space. Electrophysiological changes during rTMS were evaluated with model fitting approaches on a group- and single-subject level. TEPs and MEPs appearance during rTMS was consistent with past findings of single pulse experiments. Heterogeneous temporal progressions, fluctuations or saturation effects of brain activity were observed during rTMS depending on the TEP component. Overall, global brain activity increased over the course of stimulation. Single-subject analysis revealed inter-individual temporal courses of global brain activity. The present findings are in favor of dose-response considerations and attempts in personalization of rTMS protocols.

Neurophysiological characterization of oropharyngeal dysphagia in older patients.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize swallowing biomechanics and neurophysiology in older patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). METHODS: Observational study in 12 young healthy volunteers (HV), 9 older HV (OHV) and 12 older patients with OD with no previous diseases causing OD (OOD). Swallowing biomechanics were measured by videofluoroscopy, neurophysiology with pharyngeal sensory (pSEP) and motor evoked-potentials (pMEP) to intrapharyngeal electrical and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), respectively, and salivary neuropeptides with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: 83.3% of OOD patients had unsafe swallows (Penetration-Aspiration scale = 4.3 ± 2.1; p < 0.0001) with delayed time to laryngeal vestibule closure (362.5 ± 73.3 ms; p < 0.0001) compared to both HV groups. OOD patients had: (a) higher pharyngeal sensory threshold (p = 0.009) and delayed pSEP P1 and N2 latencies (p < 0.05 vs HV) to electrical stimulus; and (b) higher pharyngeal motor thresholds to TMS in both hemispheres (p < 0.05) and delayed pMEPs latencies (right, p < 0.0001 HV vs OHV/OOD; left, p < 0.0001 HV vs OHV/OOD). CONCLUSIONS: OOD patients have unsafe swallow and delayed swallowing biomechanics, pharyngeal hypoesthesia with disrupted conduction of pharyngeal sensory inputs, and reduced excitability and delayed cortical motor response. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest new elements in the pathophysiology of aging-associated OD and herald new and more specific neurorehabilitation treatments for these patients.

Timing of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) recovery and clinical recovery after termination of pediatric spinal deformity surgery due to loss of IONM signals.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is used to reduce the risk of spinal cord injury during pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Significant reduction and/or loss of IONM signals without immediate recovery may lead the surgeon to acutely abort the case. The timing of when monitorable signals return remains largely unknown. PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the correlation between IONM signal loss, clinical examination, and subsequent normalization of IONM signals after aborted pediatric spinal deformity surgery to help determine when it is safe to return to the operating room. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a multicenter, multidisciplinary, retrospective study of pediatric patients (<18 years old) undergoing spinal deformity surgery whose surgery was aborted due to a significant reduction or loss of IONM potentials. PATIENT SAMPLE: Sixty-six patients less than 18 years old who underwent spinal deformity surgery that was aborted due to IONM signal loss were enrolled into the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: IONM data, operative reports, and clinical examinations were investigated to determine the relationship between IONM loss, clinical examination, recovery of IONM signals, and clinical outcome. METHODS: Information regarding patient demographics, deformity type, clinical history, neurologic and ambulation status, operative details, IONM information (eg, quality of loss [SSEPs, MEPs], laterality, any recovery of signals, etc.), intraoperative wake-up test, postoperative neurologic exam, postoperative imaging, and time to return to the operating were all collected. All factors were analyzed and compared with univariate and multivariate analysis using appropriate statistical analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were enrolled with a median age of 13 years [IQR 11-14], and the most common sex was female (42/66, 63.6%). Most patients had idiopathic scoliosis (33/66, 50%). The most common causes of IONM loss were screw placement (27/66, 40.9%) followed by rod correction (19/66, 28.8%). All patients had either complete bilateral (39/66, 59.0%), partial bilateral (10/66, 15.2%) or unilateral (17/66, 25.8%) MEP loss leading to termination of the case. Overall, when patients were returned to the operating room 2 weeks postoperatively, nearly 75% (40/55) had monitorable IONM signals. Univariate analysis demonstrated that bilateral SSEP loss (p=.019), bilateral SSEP and MEP loss (p=.022) and delayed clinical neurologic recovery (p=.008) were significantly associated with having unmonitorable IONM signals at repeat surgery. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that delayed clinical neurologic recovery (> 72 hours) was significantly associated with unmonitorable IONM signals when returned to the operating room (p=.006). All patients ultimately made a full neurologic recovery. CONCLUSIONS: In children whose spinal deformity surgery was aborted due to intraoperative IONM loss, there was a strong correlation between combined intraoperative SSEP/MEP loss, the magnitude of IONM loss, the timing of clinical recovery, and the time of electrophysiological IONM recovery. The highest likelihood of having a prolonged postoperative neurological deficit and undetectable IONM signals upon return to the OR occurs with bilateral complete loss of SSEPs and MEPs.

Repeated L5 Nerve Root Compromise Detected with Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP), but Not Electromyography (EMG): A Case Report.

We report a case where neuromonitoring, using motor evoked potentials (MEP), detected an intraoperative L5 nerve root deficit during a lumbosacral decompression and instrumented fusion procedure. Critically, the MEP changes were not preceded nor accompanied by any significant spontaneous electromyography (sEMG) activity. Presumptive L5 innervated muscles, including tibialis anterior (TA), extensor hallucis longus (EHL) and gluteus maximus, were targets for nerve root surveillance using combined MEP and sEMG techniques. During a high-grade spondylolisthesis correction procedure, attempts to align a left-sided rod resulted in repeated loss and recovery cycles of MEP from the TA and EHL. No accompanying EMG alerts were associated with any of the MEP changes nor were MEP variations seen from muscles innervated above and below L5. After several attempts, the rod alignment was achieved, but significant MEP signal decrement (72% decrease) remained from the EHL. Postoperatively, the patient experienced significant foot drop on the left side that recovered over a period of 3 months. This case contributes to a growing body of evidence that exclusive reliance on sEMG for spinal nerve root scrutiny can be unreliable and MEP may provide more dependable data on nerve root patency.

Effects of Anesthetic Choice on the Incidence of Transcranial-Motor Potential-Induced Oral Trauma.

Transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) play an integral role in assessing motor tract function in surgical procedures where motor function is at risk. However, transcranial stimulation creates a risk for oral trauma. Several studies have reported on distinct factors that can influence the rate of TcMEP-induced oral trauma, but little is known about how an anesthetic regimen can influence this rate. In this retrospective review, we investigated the incidence of oral injury under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and balanced anesthesia in 66,166 cases from 2019 to 2021. There were 295 oral injuries in our sample, yielding an incidence of 0.45%, which is in line with ranges reported in the literature. A total of 222 of the injured patients were sedated with balanced anesthesia, while the remaining 73 were under TIVA anesthetics. This difference in distribution was statistically significant (p < 0.0002). Our findings suggest TIVA is associated with lower risk of oral trauma when TcMEPs are monitored, thereby improving patient safety.

Mirror Therapy Reduces Pain and Preserves Corticomotor Excitability in Human Experimental Skeletal Muscle Pain.

Approaches to preserve corticomotor excitability (CE) are attracting interest as a treatment for pain-induced changes in neural plasticity. We determined the effects of mirror therapy (MT) on skeletal muscle pain. Fifteen healthy adults who received hypertonic saline injections (5.8% NaCl, 0.2 mL) into the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of the right hand to induce experimental skeletal muscle pain were assigned to either the "MT and injection" or "injection only" group. Post-injection, the "MT and injection" group observed their left index finger abducting and adducting for 4 min, creating the illusion that the right index finger was moving. The "injection only" group remained at rest. CE and pain were assessed by measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) of the right FDI triggered by transcranial magnetic stimulation and the numerical rating scale (NRS), respectively. MEP amplitudes were significantly higher in the "MT and injection" group, a trend that persisted post-MT intervention (MT intervention; p < 0.01, post-1; p < 0.05). The time for the NRS score to reach 0 was notably shorter in the "MT and injection" group (p < 0.05). Our preliminary results suggested that MT decreases CE and pain in skeletal muscles, potentially preventing neural plasticity changes associated with skeletal muscle pain and providing early pain relief.

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation with task-oriented training improves upper extremity function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized clinical trial.

Background: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has emerged as a promising brain stimulation modality in poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation. Although several studies have examined the safety and reliability of taVNS, the mechanisms underlying motor recovery in stroke patients remain unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of taVNS paired with task-oriented training (TOT) on upper extremity function in patients with subacute stroke and explore the potential underlying mechanisms. Methods: In this double-blinded, randomized, controlled pilot trial, 40 patients with subacute stroke were randomly assigned to two groups: the VNS group (VG), receiving taVNS during TOT, and the Sham group (SG), receiving sham taVNS during TOT. The intervention was delivered 5 days per week for 4 weeks. Upper extremity function was measured using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Activities of daily living were measured by the modified Barthel Index (MBI). Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured to evaluate cortical excitability. Assessments were administered at baseline and post-intervention. Additionally, the immediate effect of taVNS was detected using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and heart rate variability (HRV) before intervention. Results: The VG showed significant improvements in upper extremity function (FMA-UE, ARAT) and activities of daily living (MBI) compared to the SG at post-intervention. Furthermore, the VG demonstrated a higher rate of elicited ipsilesional MEPs and a shorter latency of MEPs in the contralesional M1. In the VG, improvements in FMA-UE were significantly associated with reduced latency of contralesional MEPs. Additionally, fNIRS revealed increased activation in the contralesional prefrontal cortex and ipsilesional sensorimotor cortex in the VG in contrast to the SG. However, no significant between-group differences were found in HRV. Conclusion: The combination of taVNS with TOT effectively improves upper extremity function in patients with subacute stroke, potentially through modulating the bilateral cortex excitability to facilitate task-specific functional recovery.

Facilitation of motor evoked potentials after tetanic peripheral nerve stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: Tetanic stimulation of a peripheral nerve prior to transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) may enhance motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the post-tetanic MEP (p-MEP) technique in improving MEP amplitudes. METHODS: Conventional TES MEPs (c-MEP) and p-MEPs with left upper limb stimulation (p-MEPUL) or left lower limb stimulation (p-MEPLL) were performed in 26 patients. Bilateral hand and foot MEP amplitudes obtained with each protocol were compared. Subgroup comparisons were performed for myelopathy and peripheral neuropathy patients. Within-subject amplitude differences between c-MEP and each p-MEP technique were compared using a Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 52.7 years (range, 12-79 years). Overall, p-MEPUL resulted in MEP improvement in 25 of 26 (96%) patients, and p-MEPLL improved MEPs in 19 of 26 (73%) patients. The increase in MEP amplitudes were statistically significant in all muscle groups except left foot. Similar improvements were seen in the myelopathy group; in the neuropathy group, p-MEPUL produced similar results, but p-MEPLL did not. CONCLUSIONS: The p-MEP technique can improve MEP amplitudes, including in patients with myelopathy. In patients with peripheral neuropathy, the results were mixed. SIGNIFICANCE: Tetanic stimulation can enhance intraoperative MEP amplitudes.

Electrodiagnostic testing in dogs with disorders of the spinal cord or cauda equina.

Electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing is uncommonly utilized in dogs other than for investigation of disorders of the neuromuscular system. In dogs with diseases affecting the spinal cord or cauda equina, EDX testing can provide functional data complementary to imaging information that together can guide therapeutic and management approaches. Additionally, in some clinical scenarios, EDX testing prior to advanced imaging is integral to identifying if there is spinal cord or cauda equina involvement and can aid in determining the appropriate diagnostic path. This review will outline EDX testing methods that have been reported in dogs relating to the diagnosis, monitoring or prognosis of various conditions affecting the spinal cord and cauda equina. The various tests will be briefly outlined regarding how they are performed and what information is provided. The main focus will be on clinical applications including highlighting situations where EDX testing is useful for differentiating between neurologic and non-neurologic presentations. Additional ways these EDX techniques could be incorporated in the management of diseases of the spinal cord and cauda equina in dogs will be presented.