The kinematics and strategies of recovery steps during lateral losses of balance in standing at different perturbation magnitudes in older adults with varying history of falls.

BACKGROUND: Step-recovery responses are critical in preventing falls when balance is lost unexpectedly. We investigated the kinematics and strategies of balance recovery in older adults with a varying history of falls. METHODS: In a laboratory study, 51 non-fallers (NFs), 20 one-time fallers (OFs), and 12 recurrent-fallers (RFs) were exposed to random right/left unannounced underfoot perturbations in standing of increasing magnitude. The stepping strategies and kinematics across an increasing magnitude of perturbations and the single- and multiple-step threshold trials, i.e., the lowest perturbation magnitude to evoke single step and multiple steps, respectively, were analyzed. Fall efficacy (FES) and self-reported lower-extremity function were also assessed. RESULTS: OFs had significantly lower single- and multiple-step threshold levels than NFs; the recovery-step kinematics were similar. Surprisingly, RFs did not differ from NFs in either threshold. The kinematics in the single-step threshold trial in RFs, however, showed a significant delay in step initiation duration, longer step duration, and larger center of mass (CoM) displacement compared with NFs and OFs. In the multiple-step threshold trial, the RFs exhibited larger CoM displacements and longer time to fully recover from balance loss. Interestingly, in the single-stepping trials, 45% of the step-recovery strategies used by RFs were the loaded-leg strategy, about two times more than OFs and NFs (22.5 and 24.2%, respectively). During the multiple-stepping trials, 27.3% of the first-step recovery strategies used by RFs were the loaded-leg strategy about two times more than OFs and NFs (11.9 and 16.4%, respectively), the crossover stepping strategy was the dominated response in all 3 groups (about 50%). In addition, RFs reported a lower low-extremity function compared with NFs, and higher FES in the OFs. CONCLUSIONS: RFs had impaired kinematics during both single-step and multiple-step recovery responses which was associated with greater leg dysfunction. OFs and NFs had similar recovery-step kinematics, but OFs were more likely to step at lower perturbation magnitudes suggesting a more "responsive" over-reactive step response related from their higher fear of falling and not due to impaired balance abilities. These data provide insight into how a varying history of falls might affect balance recovery to a lateral postural perturbation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered prospectively on November 9th, 2011 at clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT01439451 ).

Insufficient Balance Recovery Following Unannounced External Perturbations in Persons With Stroke.

Background. Persons with stroke (PwS) are at increased risk of falls, especially toward the paretic side, increasing the probability of a hip fracture. The ability to recover from unexpected loss of balance is a critical factor in fall prevention. Objectives. We aimed to compare reactive balance capacity and step kinematics between PwS and healthy controls. Methods. Thirty subacute PwS and 15 healthy controls were exposed to forward, backward, right, and left unannounced surface translations in 6 increasing intensities while standing. Single step threshold, multiple step threshold, and fall threshold (ie, perturbation intensity leading to a fall into harness system) were recorded as well as reactive step initiation time, step length, and step velocity. Results. Twenty-five PwS fell into harness system during the experiment while healthy controls did not fall. Fourteen out of 31 falls occurred in response to surface translations toward the nonparetic side, that is, falling toward the paretic side. Compared with healthy controls, PwS demonstrated significantly lower fall threshold and multiple step threshold in response to forward, backward, and lateral surface translations. Impairments were more pronounced in response to forward surface translation and toward the nonparetic side (ie, loss of balance toward the paretic side). A trend toward significant shorter step length in response to lateral surface translations was found in PwS compared with healthy controls. Conclusions. Findings highlight the importance of assessing reactive balance capacity in response to perturbations in different directions and intensities in addition to the routine assessment in PwS.

Effects of Perturbation-Based Balance Training in Subacute Persons With Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Reactive balance responses are critical for fall prevention. Perturbation-based balance training (PBBT) has shown a positive effect in reducing the risk of falls among older adults and persons with Parkinson's disease. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of a short-term PBBT on reactive balance responses, performance-based measures of balance and gait and balance confidence. METHODS: Thirty-four moderate-high functioning, subacute persons with stroke (PwS) (lower extremity Fugl-Meyer score 29.2 ± 4.3; Berg Balance Scale [BBS] score 43.8 ± 9.5, 42.0 ± 18.7 days after stroke onset) hospitalized in a rehabilitation setting were randomly allocated to PBBT (n = 18) and weight shifting and gait training (WS>) (n = 16). Both groups received 12 training sessions, 30 minutes each, for a period of 2.5 weeks. PBBT included unexpected balance perturbations during standing and treadmill walking, WS> included weight shifting in standing and treadmill walking without perturbations. The main outcome measures, that is, multiple step-threshold and fall-threshold were examined at baseline, immediately postintervention, and about 5 weeks postintervention. The secondary outcome measures, that is, BBS, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), 10-meter walk test (10MWT), and Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale were examined at baseline and immediately postintervention. RESULTS: Compared with the WS> group, immediately postintervention participants in the PBBT group showed higher multiple-step thresholds in response to forward and backward surface translations (effect size [ES] = 1.07 and ES = 1.10, respectively) and moderate ES in the ABC scale (ES = 0.74). No significant differences were found in fall-threshold, BBS, 6MWT, and 10MWT between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of perturbation training during rehabilitation of PwS improved reactive balance and balance confidence.

The inter-observer reliability and agreement of lateral balance recovery responses in older and younger adults.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter-observer reliability and agreement of balance recovery responses, step and multiple-steps thresholds, and kinematic parameters of stepping responses. Older and younger adults were exposed to 36 progressively challenging right and left unannounced surface translations during quiet standing. Subjects were instructed to "react naturally". Step threshold and multiple-step threshold were defined as the minimum disturbance magnitude that consistently elicited one and more than one recovery step, respectively. Fall threshold is defined as the minimum disturbance magnitude from which a fall resulted (i.e., fall into harness system or grasped one of the anchor straps of the harness, or grasped the research assistant to maintain balance). The inter-observer reliability of balance recovery responses for older adults were excellent, especially for step and multiple-step thresholds (ICC2,1 = 0.978 and ICC2,1 = 0.971, respectively; p < 0.001). Also kinematic parameters of stepping responses such as step recovery duration and step length were excellent (ICC2,1 > 0.975 and ICC2,1 = 0.978, respectively; p < 0.001), substantial reliability was found for swing phase duration (ICC2,1 = 0.693, p < 0.001). Younger adults showed similar ICCs. The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated excellent limits of agreement (LOA > 90%) for most kinematic step parameters and stepping thresholds. These results suggest that balance recovery responses and kinematic parameters of stepping including step threshold and multiple-step threshold are extremely reliable parameters. The measure of balance recovery responses from unexpected loss of balance is feasible and can be used in clinical setting and research-related assessments of fall risk.