The impact of zygomatic buttress bone graft on nasal floor augmentation in unilateral alveolar cleft patients with late referral: A case series.

PURPOSE: This preliminary study aimed to assess the efficacy of zygomatic buttress bone grafting for nasal floor augmentation in patients with a unilateral alveolar cleft who were referred after the optimal timetable for this surgery had elapsed. CASE SERIES: Five patients, aged 12-18 years, with unilateral alveolar clefts were treated at Qaem Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. Initially, a mucous layer was established on the side of the cleft nose, followed by forming a bony bridge between the defect's sides through a bone graft derived from the zygomatic buttress and xenograft bone powder. Subsequently, the grafted region was covered with an absorbable collagen membrane, and the oral-side flap was sealed. Post-operative follow-ups occurred at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed 6 months post-treatment. Discrepancy between the anterior edge height of the pyriform aperture on the healthy and cleft sides post-grafting was assessed. The average disparity between the height of the anterior edge of the pyriform aperture on the healthy side and the peak height achieved post-grafting on the cleft side was 1.90 ± 2.82 mm. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the study, it seems that zygomatic buttress is applicable for late unilateral alveolar bone grafting as an intraoral source, and is helpful in symmetric bony nasal floor reconstruction, with a good success rate.

Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography Evaluation of the Relationship between Orthodontic Vertical Direction Parameters and the Distance from the Apex of the Upper Central Tooth to the Nasal Floor and Anterior Nasal Spine.

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the vertical cephalometric values and the distance from the apex tip of the upper central tooth (U1A) to the anterior nasal spine (ANS) and nasal floor (NF) using cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT). One hundred and twenty-two patients who applied to the Department of Orthodontics between January 2011 and June 2019 were included. The distances between the U1A and the NF and ANS were measured using CBCT. Statistical significance was considered as p < 0.05. Of the 122 individuals, 73.8% (n = 90) were female and 26.2% (n = 32) were male, with a mean age of 22.8 ± 3.3 years. A statistically significant moderate positive correlation was found between the mean NF-U1A values and the N-Me, ANS-Me, ANS-Gn, S-Go, and N-ANS measurements (p < 0.01). A statistically significant positive correlation was found between the mean ANS-U1A values and the Ar-Go-Me, total posterior angles, N-Me, SN/GoGn and Y-axis angle, ANS-Me, and ANS-Gn measurements (p < 0.01). The distance from the U1A to the ANS and NF was related to the orthodontic vertical direction parameters. The ANS-U1A and NF-U1A distances can serve as reference points for identifying the orthodontic vertical growth pattern from CBCT scans.

Modified Mucosal Reconstruction in Unilateral Complete Cleft of Lip and Primary Palate: Surgical Technique and Practical Strategies.

BACKGROUND: The nasal floor and intraoral lining reconstruction of unilateral complete cleft of lip and primary palate has sparsely been reported. Solution: This article combines the previously-described C-flap mucosal flap and inferior turbinate flap with the newly-described lateral nasal mucosal flap for the mucosal repair of this uncommon subtype of deformity. Valuable practical strategies are offered to optimize the surgical execution within a limited pediatric intranasal surgical access, targeting to minimize tissue trauma and bleeding.

Efficacy of Nasal Floor Augmentation on the Survival Rate of Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.

Aim: To systematically review the existing scientific literature, to summarize and assess the efficacy of the nasal floor augmentation on the survival rate of dental implants by systematically reviewing the available literature. Methodology: Review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in PROSPERO-CRD42027289143. Electronic databases like PubMed, google scholar and Ebsco Host were searched from 2000 to December 2021 for studies reporting efficacy of nasal floor augmentation and reporting outcomes in terms of survival rates of dental implants. Quality assessment of included comparative follow-up studies was done using the critical checklist put forward by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) was used. Results: Only nine studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Of those nine studies, five were case reports and four comparative follow-up studies. A total of 14 implants were placed in five patients with a survival rate of 100% in included case reports, while a total of 408 implants were placed in 130 patients with survival rates ranging from 89% to 100% in included comparative follow-up studies. No complications were observed during follow-ups, and the patients were satisfied with the functional and aesthetic results of the treatment. Quality assessment of included studies showed moderate to low risk of bias with overall high quality of studies. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review indicate that implant placement by nasal floor augmentation techniques can be considered as a predictable treatment modality. However, due to the scarcity of literature, more studies should be carried out on proving the efficacy of nasal floor augmentation on survival rate or success of dental Implants.

Two-stage alveolar bone grafting for nasal floor reconstruction in adult cleft patients.

Alveolar cleft is one of the key links of cleft lip and palate reconstruction due to its close relationship with tooth and jaw coordination and nasolabial deformity. The alveolar bone graft repairs the hole in the gum ridge and stabilizes the bone arch, providing better support for the base of the nose and new bone for the roots of the developing teeth to grow into. Unfortunately, bone graft failure in the traditional way, even among minor clefts, bony hypoplasia, or absence that affects the nasal base and piriform rim, is common. Two-stage alveolar bone grafting, which has advantages in addressing the underlying skeleton and deficiency, could be an optional surgical procedure for nasal floor reconstruction in adult patients with a broad alveolar cleft.

Successful Implant Placement via Simultaneous Nasal Floor Augmentation in an Inferior Meatus Pneumatization Case.

Partially edentulous patients who present with inadequate bone height in the posterior maxillary can predictably be rehabilitated with lateral wall sinus augmentation and subsequent implant placement. However, the sinus augmentation is defined by variations observed in the anatomical presentation of the maxillary sinus. Herein, we describe a case study managing sinus augmentation when a rare anatomic variant termed inferior meatus pneumatization was observed. A 65-year-old female patient presented, wherein the inferior meatus of the nasal cavity was located directly above the maxillary posterior dentition as opposed to the maxillary sinus. The clinically atrophied maxilla was rehabilitated by employing nasal floor elevation, bone augmentation, and simultaneous implant placement. Post-operatively, no sino-nasal complications were recorded. Subsequently, 8 months after the initial procedure, osteointegration of the implants along with the presence of vital bone was observed. The patient posterior occlusion in the upper right quadrant was rehabilitated by engaging the stable implants with a cement-retained fixed final prosthesis. Follow-ups recorded for up to 2 years demonstrated no further complications. The case report demonstrates diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and management of inferior meatus pneumatization and a viable surgical approach for augmentation and implant treatment.

Two-stage alveolar bone grafting for nasal floor reconstruction in adult cleft patients / 华西口腔医学杂志

Alveolar cleft is one of the key links of cleft lip and palate reconstruction due to its close relationship with tooth and jaw coordination and nasolabial deformity. The alveolar bone graft repairs the hole in the gum ridge and stabilizes the bone arch, providing better support for the base of the nose and new bone for the roots of the developing teeth to grow into. Unfortunately, bone graft failure in the traditional way, even among minor clefts, bony hypoplasia, or absence that affects the nasal base and piriform rim, is common. Two-stage alveolar bone grafting, which has advantages in addressing the underlying skeleton and deficiency, could be an optional surgical procedure for nasal floor reconstruction in adult patients with a broad alveolar cleft.

The Posterior Septal Nasal Floor Mucosal Flap for Cranial Base Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: While pedicled intranasal flaps, such as the nasoseptal flap (NSF), successfully reduce postoperative CSF leaks following endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to the skull base, morbidity remains prevalent. This study describes the first cadaveric description and radiographic analysis of the posterior septal nasal floor mucosal flap (PSNF) designed to reduce pedicled nasal flap morbidity. A case series is also detailed. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric dissection, radiographic analysis, and case series. METHODS: Seven cadaver specimens underwent harvest of the PSNF. PSNF flap dimensions were measured on the thirty deidentified sinus computed tomography (CT) scans. A retrospective case series was performed on the first set of patients who received the PSNF for reconstruction of a sellar base defect. Information concerning complications, symptoms, and the appearance of the flap was recorded from records of the patient's postoperative inpatient stay, 1-week postop visit, and 1-month postop visit. RESULTS: Cadaver dissection of the PSNF flap demonstrated good arc rotation along its pedicle with ability to cover both sellar and planum defects. Cadaveric flap measurements and CT-derived measurements estimated a mean surface area of 16.7 and 18.3 cm2 , respectively. 15 patients underwent reconstruction of a sellar or planum defect using the PSNF technique. Only one CSF leak was encountered postoperatively. Minimal crusting of the flap and donor site was seen 1 month postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The PSNF flap provides a sizeable pedicled region for reconstruction comparable to other pedicled nasal flaps. Our case series demonstrated good postoperative outcomes without reduced donor site morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:1561-1568, 2022.

Dental Implants Survival After Nasal Floor Elevation: A Systematic Review.

The aim of this work is to assess the clinical outcomes of implants placed after a nasal floor elevation procedure. A systematic review was conducted using 4 electronic databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Directory of Open Access Journals, and Scopus, following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews) statement recommendations to answer the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) question: "In patients undergoing dental implant placement in the maxillary anterior region (P), Do implants placed after nasal floor elevation (I) have a different survival (O) from those implants placed without grafting procedures (C)? The study was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021229479). Included article quality was assessed using the "NIH quality assessment tool", "The Newcastle-Ottawa scale," and "JBI critical appraisal tools for case reports." Twelve articles were finally selected, including 151 patients and 460 implants. The weighted mean follow-up was 32.2 months, and the weighted survival rate after this period was 97.64% (range: 89.2%-100%). No statistical differences could be inferred between the treatments performed in 1- or 2-stage, following a lateral approach or a transcrestal approach or using different grafting materials. A great heterogeneity was found in study design and methodological aspects. For this reason, a quantitative analysis followed by meta-analysis was not possible. Within the limitations of this study, implants placed after a nasal floor elevation present a good survival and a low range of complications. In absence of randomized studies, the level of evidence was low, attending the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) system and based on the study quality level, the strength of evidence attending the SORT (Strength Of Recommendation Taxonomy) was B.

Implant-to-nasal floor dimensions projected by panoramic radiographs in the maxillary incisor-canine region: implications for dental implant treatment.

To make a comparison of panoramic radiography (PAN) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) determinations of implant-to-nasal floor dimensions (INFD) in the anterior maxillary region, and to assist in determining in which tooth regions additional radiation exposure involved in CBCT scans is justifiable. Data related to INFD by PAN (PAN-D) at implant-to-nasal floor sites (central incisor, lateral incisor, canine) were gathered using 141 implant sites from 119 adult patients. INFD was estimated employing the CBCT technique as a reference method. PAN analysis equations were created for estimation of INFD by CBCT (CBCT-D) specific to implant sites. For assessment of the agreement between the PAN and CBCT methodologies, the Bland-Altman approach was employed. There were robust and significant odds ratios that implants in the canine region would fall into the underestimation groups of > 0 mm (4.5:1) (p = 0.003), > 0.5 mm (6.2:1) (p < 0.001), and > 1 mm (5.4:1) (p = 0.002). The root mean squared error (RMSE) and pure error (PE) were highest for the canine region (RMSE = 1.973 mm, PE = 2.20 mm). This research offers evidence of site-specific underestimations of available horizontal bone dimensions for implants when PAN is employed to assess the availability of vertical bone dimensions. The data suggest that it may be necessary to exclude canine regions when making assessment of INFD through PAN. Use of CBCT may, therefore, be recommended for all implant size and angulation estimations in this region.

A Pedicled Posterior Septal-Nasal Floor Flap and a Novel Rescue Flap for Skull Base Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: We devised a new surgical alternative to the conventional nasoseptal flap, a pedicled posterior septal-nasal floor flap that we named the Kegon flap. We evaluated the effectiveness of this flap for skull base reconstruction in patients with high-flow cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage after sellar/parasellar tumor resection. METHODS: The Kegon flap with a novel rescue flap was designed to preserve blood flow and mucosa anterior to the nasal septum and to avoid flap damage during surgery. We retrospectively evaluated postoperative flap perfusion with T1-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and characterized complications and wound healing in 5 patients who experienced high-flow CSF leakage after sellar/parasellar tumor resection requiring reconstruction. RESULTS: Postoperative T1-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated good flap perfusion in all patients. The area reconstructed with the Kegon flap healed within the first month following surgery. No postoperative CSF leakage or nasal hemorrhage was observed. There was no perforation of the anterior nasal septum after surgery. The mucosal defect had completely epithelialized in all patients by 3 months after surgery. There were no instances of prolonged nasal crusting or any subjective decrease in olfactory function 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a Kegon flap with a novel rescue flap was effective and helped preserve nasal structure and function in patients undergoing skull base reconstruction after sellar/parasellar tumor resection associated with high-flow CSF leakage.

Radiographic and Nasal Endoscopic Observation of Accidentally Perforated Anterior Nasal Cavity With Dental Implants: Case Reports with 5-23 Years of Follow-Up.

Severe atrophy of the maxillary anterior region may make implant placement difficult and, as a result, iatrogenic complications such as nasal floor perforation may occur. The purpose of the present case reports is to present radiographic and nasal endoscopic features in the anterior nasal floor when dental implants were inadvertently perforated into nasal cavities. Between 1996 and 2018, 4 patients recorded with anterior nasal floor perforation with dental implants were followed and reviewed with panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computerized tomography. Also, nasal endoscopic examinations were performed by one otolaryngologist. Four implants in 4 patients were included in this case report. All implants achieved osteointegration and survived for 5-23 years without clinical complications. Three implants did not show any mucosal thickening and only one had minor mucosal thickening as visible on the radiographs. Nasal endoscopy examinations revealed that 3 implants were covered with mucosa and one had threads exposed. Intraorally, only one had clinical signs of peri-implant mucositis. Dental implants that perforated into the anterior nasal floor did not show clinical, radiographic, and nasal endoscopic complications during the long-term follow-up period. Nasal endoscopy was a better diagnostic tool to evaluate the implants perforated into the nasal cavity than conventional panoramic or cone-beam computerized tomography.

Unique air inclusions within the nasopalatine duct indicating its presence radiographically: a case presentation.

The anterior maxilla is characterized by the nasopalatine canal that originates bilaterally from the anterior nasal floor, subsequently fuses, and terminates at the incisive foramen in the anterior palate. Embryologically, this structure forms within the primary palate, and contains the neurovascular bundle, but also continuous epithelialized bands. The latter, termed nasopalatine ducts, usually degenerate and/or obliterate before birth. However, in some individuals, the ducts may remain partially or completely patent. The present case report describes for the first time in the literature a rare finding of air inclusions within the anatomical area of the nasopalatine canal indicating the presence of a nasopalatine duct as visualized with cone beam computed tomography. The patient was asymptomatic and the radiographic findings were seen incidentally. An endoscopic inspection of the anterior nasal cavities confirmed the presence of the nasal openings of the partially patent nasopalatine ducts.

Distraction Osteogenesis Maxillary Expansion (DOME) for adult obstructive sleep apnea patients with narrow maxilla and nasal floor.

OBJECTIVES: This study correlates objective and subjective measurements associated with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) to define the efficacy of Distraction Osteogenesis Maxillary Expansion (DOME) to treat adult OSA patients with narrow maxilla and nasal floor. METHODS: This is a retrospective study reviewing cases from September 2014 through April 2018 with 75 eligible subjects. Inclusion criteria required OSA confirmed by attended polysomnography (PSG). Pre- and Post-operative clinical data were measured at the Stanford Sleep Medicine and Stanford Sleep Surgery Clinics. DOME is a two-step process starting with insertion of custom-fabricated maxillary expanders anchored to the hard palate by mini-implants followed by minimally invasive osteotomies. After maxillary expansion was complete, orthodontic treatment to restore normal occlusion was initiated. Perioperative Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), and Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) were measured for 43, 72, 72, and 34 subjects respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using paired T-test with significance set at p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean age of test subjects was 30.5 ± 8.5 years with a gender distribution of 57 males and 18 females. There was a significant reduction in pre and post-operative NOSE score (10.94 ± 5.51 to 3.28 ± 2.89, p < 0.0001), mean ESS score (10.48 ± 5.4 to 6.69 ± 4.75, p < 0.0001), and AHI (17.65 ± 19.30 to 8.17 ± 8.47, p < 0.0001) with an increased percentage of REM sleep (14.4 ± 8.3% to 22.7 ± 6.6%, p = 0.0014). No significant adverse effects were identified. CONCLUSIONS: DOME treatment reduced the severity of OSA, refractory nasal obstruction, daytime somnolence, and increased the percentage of REM sleep in this selected cohort of adults OSA patients with narrow maxilla and nasal floor.

The Upper Airway Nasal Complex: Structural Contribution to Persistent Nasal Obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of the nasal floor and hard palate morphology to nasal obstruction for nonresponders to prior intranasal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. METHODS: Institutional review board-approved, retrospective institutional database analysis was obtained of a cohort of 575 patients who presented with nasal obstruction over a 21-year period. Of the patients, 89 met inclusion criteria: 52 were placed into the experimental group, defined as having persistent nasal obstruction following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), septoplasty, nasal valve repair, and/or turbinoplasty using validated subjective questionnaires, and 37 were placed into the control group, defined as having resolution of subjective nasal obstruction. Computed tomography imaging was presented to 3 blinded experts, who measured numerous nasal airway and hard palate morphology parameters, including anterior nasal floor width, anterior maxillary angle, maxilla width, anterior nasal floor width, and palatal vault height. Standard demographic information, comorbidities, perioperative 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), and follow-up time were also assessed. Wilcox rank sum analysis or t test was performed where appropriate. RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 2 to 36 months following surgical intervention. Several skeletal characteristics within the upper airway were significantly associated with persistent nasal obstruction, including acute maxillary angle (P = .035), narrow maxillary width (P = .006), and high arched palate (P = .004). CONCLUSION: Persistent nasal obstruction may be seen in patients with narrow, high arched hard palate despite prior nasal surgical intervention and may benefit from additional skeletal remodeling procedures such as maxillary expansion.

Distances of root apices to adjacent anatomical structures in the anterior maxilla: an analysis using cone beam computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to assess the anatomical relationship of anterior maxillary teeth to the nasal floor in patients referred for apical surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computed tomographic images (CBCT) of 83 patients were analysed retrospectively to quantify the distances between the root apices of maxillary anterior teeth (canine to canine) to the nasal floor or maxillary sinus (whichever was closer). Secondary outcome variables were the distances of the periapical lesion to the nasal floor, distances of the apices to the labial and palatal bone plates as well as to the neighbouring teeth. RESULTS: A total of 93 teeth (39 central, 35 lateral incisors and 19 canines) were analysed. The mean shortest distances of the apices to the nasal floor (or maxillary sinus) were 8.54 mm for central incisors, 9.49 mm for lateral incisors and 5.39 mm for the canines. The canines exhibited a significantly shorter distance to the nasal floor/maxillary sinus. In the presence of an osteolysis, the distance to the nasal floor was significantly shorter compared to the teeth without lesions. The lateral and central incisors showed significant proximity to each other at the level of the future surgical resection (3 mm from the apex). CONCLUSIONS: A close proximity between apices and adjacent anatomical structures such as nasal floor, maxillary sinus or adjacent roots could be shown in some cases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CBCT could be a valuable adjunctive imaging tool prior to apical surgery in the anterior maxilla to assess the risk for and decrease the incidence of damage to neighbouring anatomical structures such as the nasal floor, maxillary sinus or adjacent roots.

Modified maxillary vestibular approach with subperiostal intranasal dissection for surgical extractions of mesiodentes impacted in the floor of the nasal cavity.

INTRODUCTION: Impacted mesiodentes in the inverted position may interfere with the base of the nasal cavity or the nasal septum. They can rarely erupt into the nose as well. Traditionally they are extracted via intraoral approaches (transpalatal or vestibular). Also, an endoscopically assisted transnasal approach can be used. In this paper, the authors are the first to present a group of patients suffering from impacted mesiodentes who have been surgically treated using a modified maxillary vestibular approach with subperiostal intranasal dissection. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The prospective study was completed in the time period 12/2013-6/2017. The inclusion criteria were: 1. Mesiodens impacted in the inverted position extending to the base of the nasal cavity or into the nasal septum without concomitant pathological lesion and without eruption into the nasal cavity. 2. Localization of the mesiodens at the level of or dorsally to the roots of the upper middle incisors in the sagittal plane or ventrally to the roots of these teeth, but with the crown extending significantly posteriorly to the base of the nasal cavity.3. Indication for extraction because of clinical or orthodontic reasons. RESULTS: In total, 9 patients were enrolled into the group. In these patients, surgical extractions of 9 mesiodentes were performed using the alternative approach described above. All extractions were done according to a uniform surgical protocol. The mean age of the patients was 11.7 ± 3.1 years (age range 7-17 years). The crown's most cranial point exceeded the bone of the nasal cavity on average by2.0 ± 1.4 mm (in the range 0-5 mm). 8 mesiodentes were conical, 1 was tuberculate. Surgical procedure and postoperative healing were always without any complications. CONCLUSION: For the removal of midline supernumerary teeth, the modified maxillary vestibular approach with subperiostal intranasal dissection in comparison to the intraoral palatal approach provides less postoperative morbidity and a lower risk of complications (smaller surgical wound, minimal exposure of maxilla, minimal bone loss, reduced risk of damage to the roots of the upper incisors, lower risk of damage to the nasopalatine neurovascular bundle, good visibility in the surgical field, easier surgery, and finally no need of postoperative palatal splint). For oral and maxillofacial surgeons the presented technique represents a more traditional way of surgical tooth extraction than the endoscopically assisted transnasal approach.

Vascular Leiomyoma of the Nasal Floor: The Risk of Misdiagnosis

Premaxillary palatal flap (PPF) as an aid to create nasal floor in anterior palatal fistula closure of cleft patients. Technical note.

Fistula behind premaxilla in cleft patients is the second most common in frequency and the most difficult location for closure. High risk of failure is reported after corrective surgeries in this region. Two layer closures are important in this topic. Reflection of palatal premaxillary mucosa provides a new source for nasal lining that is introduced in this article as a technical note and is explained with four cases. While the premaxillary palatal flap is a promising alternative for closure of these types of clefts, more studies are necessary before it can be universally recommended.

The nasal lift technique for augmentation of the maxillary ridge: technical note.

Placement of dental implants in a severely resorbed anterior maxillary alveolar ridge is limited by the fact that implants may penetrate the nasal cavity. However, when the maxilla shows unusual anatomical changes, reconstruction with implants can be a challenge. Options to increase the bone in this region to permit placement of implants include: maxillary onlay bone graft, Le Fort I interpositional bone graft, and augmentation of the nasal floor, which is a procedure where only the piriform rim and the anterior nasal spine are exposed through an intraoral approach. In our case we modified this to what we call the nasal lift technique, which is a combination of turbinectomy followed by lifting of the anteroposterior nasal floor through a lateral window using autogenous bone or bone substitutes to augment the space.