Stereotactic radiosurgery with immunotherapy is associated with improved overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis.

PURPOSE: Immunotherapy is now a first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanomaQuery. It is important to understand the relationship between immunotherapy and radiation to the brain. The aim of this study was to assess the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or WBRT in addition to immunotherapy in patients with melanoma or NSCLC metastatic to the brain. METHODS/PATIENTS: Using the National Cancer Database, 2951 patients with NSCLC and 936 patients with melanoma treated with immunotherapy were identified. Patients were classified as having received immunotherapy alone, immunotherapy with SRS, or immunotherapy with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Kaplan-Meier, multivariate Cox regression analyses, and propensity matching were performed to evaluate the impact of adding SRS to immunotherapy on overall survival (OS). Immortal survival bias was accounted for by only including patients who received radiation before immunotherapy and time zero was defined as the start of immunotherapy. RESULTS: 205(6.9%) and 75(8.0%) patients received immunotherapy with no radiation, 822(27.9%) and 326(34.8%) received SRS and immunotherapy, and 1924(65.2%) and 535(57.2%) received WBRT and immunotherapy for NSCLC and melanoma, respectively. Adding SRS to immunotherapy was associated with improved OS in multivariate analyses (NSCLC HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.99, p = 0.044; melanoma HR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.90, p = 0.011). The addition of WBRT to immunotherapy did not improve OS in patients with melanoma nor NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that treatment with SRS and immunotherapy is associated with improved OS compared to immunotherapy alone for patients with melanoma or NSCLC metastatic to the brain.

Comparative Effectiveness of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The use of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer has been increasing in recent years, but the long-term overall survival characteristics of this approach is currently unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer within the National Cancer Database. Patients who received TNT (defined as chemotherapy, followed by CRT, followed by surgery) were propensity score matched to patients who received adjuvant therapy (defined as CRT, followed by surgery, followed by chemotherapy). We compared overall survival (OS) and rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) between the 2 arms. RESULTS: Of the 4300 patients in our cohort, 3502 (81%) received adjuvant therapy and 798 (19%) received TNT. At baseline, patients who received TNT were more likely to have higher clinical T and N stages (P< .001). The 5-year OS was 77% for both TNT and adjuvant therapy patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.28, P = .57). After propensity score matching and adjusting for potential confounders, there were no significant differences in OS (HRadj 1.00, 95% CI, 0.71-1.40, P = .99). After propensity score matching, there were higher pCR rates among TNT patients (16.1%) compared to adjuvant therapy patients (12.0%) (P = .037). CONCLUSION: In this observational study, we found TNT was not associated with a lower OS compared to standard adjuvant chemotherapy. This finding potentially reassures clinicians choosing TNT as an alternative to adjuvant chemotherapy. However, future prospective data are needed to confirm these findings.

Important prognostic factors in leiomyosarcoma survival: a National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis.

BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is an aggressive, malignant mesenchymal tumor with characteristic smooth muscle lineage accounting for 10-20% of all soft tissue tumors. The goal of this study is to determine the impact of prognostic factors on leiomyosarcoma survival irrespective of primary anatomical site. METHODS: There were a total of 7154 patients with primary leiomyosarcoma identified and analyzed from the National Cancer Database. Descriptive statistics, median survival, and 5- and 10-year survival probabilities were calculated along with a Cox proportional hazard model to determine independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: In this study, females comprised 68.3% of the cohort with a median age of 58 years. The most common primary anatomical sites were the extremities followed by female reproductive organs, abdomen, pelvis, thorax or lung, and head or neck. Tumors localized in the female reproductive organs had the worst survival (5-year survival probability: 45.3%), while tumors localized in the extremities had the best survival outcomes (5-year survival probability: 73.4%). Surgery with adjuvant radiation yielded better outcomes compared to surgery alone (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.91). Microscopic and macroscopic margins resulted in a 32% and a 134% increased risk in mortality, respectively, when compared to negative surgical margins (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study showed a significantly higher risk of mortality associated with older patients, tumors localized to the female reproductive organs, African American patients, higher tumor stage, increased Charlson/Deyo scores, tumors treated with surgery alone without adjuvant radiation, and tumors with positive microscopic, macroscopic, or indeterminate surgical margins.

Sinonasal mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a review of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Primary sinonasal mucoepidermoid carcinoma (SN-MEC) is a malignancy arising from seromucinous glands of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Given its rarity, few large-scale studies have been performed. In this study we describe the incidence and determinants of survival of patients with SN-MEC leveraging the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS: This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study of patients diagnosed with SN-MEC between 2004 and 2012 within the NCDB. The main outcome measure was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were identified. The cohort was composed of 47.6% males. Mean age at diagnosis was 59.7 years. The maxillary sinus was the most common primary site, accounting for 45.7% of cases. Eleven percent of patients presented with nodal disease, whereas 2.1% had distant metastases. Stage IV disease was seen in 30.4% of cases. A total of 79.8% of the patients underwent surgery, 61.0% received radiation therapy, and 15.1% had chemotherapy. OS at 1, 2, and 5 years was 83%, 77.0%, and 57%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, Medicaid insurance status (hazard ratio [HR], 7.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74-30.57), advanced tumor size (HR, 4.94; 95% CI, 1.19-20.5), and advanced nodal disease (N1: HR, 9.48; 95% CI, 1.66-54.23; N2B: HR, 19.3; 95% CI, 1.07-350.64) were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSION: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the most common salivary gland malignancy but a rare sinonasal malignancy, with 5-year survival for SN-MEC approximating 50%. A significant proportion of patients present with advanced disease. Both socioeconomic factors and tumor characteristics are associated with survival.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the sinonasal tract: a review of the national cancer database.

BACKGROUND: Sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (SNACC) is a rare malignancy with a propensity for distant metastasis. In this study we describe the incidence and determinants of survival among patients with SNACC between the years 2004 and 2012 using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS: This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study performed at a tertiary academic medical center. All participants were diagnosed with SNACC between 2004 and 2012 within the NCDB. The main outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 793 patients were identified. The cohort was composed of 46.9% males. Mean age at diagnosis was 59.6 years. The maxillary sinus was the most common primary site (49.7%). Nodal disease was seen in 3.6% of the patients, whereas 3.7% had distant metastases. Stage IV disease was seen in 49.1% of cases. In total, 77.4% of patients underwent surgery, 68.2% received radiation therapy, and 16.4% had chemotherapy. Median OS was 78.5 months; OS at 1, 2, and 5 years was 91%, 83%, and 61%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, advanced age (p = 0.001), frontal sinus primary site (p < 0.001), positive margins (p < 0.001), Charlson comorbidity index >0 (p = 0.01), residing in an urban setting (p = 0.04), poorly differentiated or undifferentiated tumor grade (p = 0.003), and advanced tumor stage (p = 0.01) were associated with worse OS, whereas surgery (p < 0.001), but not radiation therapy (p = 0.52) or chemotherapy (p = 0.57), predicted improved OS. CONCLUSION: Predictors of survival in SNACC include age, comorbidity status, grade, and stage. Surgery is associated with improved survival and remains the mainstay of therapy, whereas the roles of radiation therapy and chemotherapy require future investigation.

Effect of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation on Overall Survival in Metastatic Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have a high incidence of occult brain metastases and are often treated with prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). Despite a small survival advantage in some studies, the role of PCI in extensive stage SCLC remains controversial. We used the National Cancer Database to assess survival of patients with metastatic SCLC treated with PCI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Metastatic SCLC patients without brain metastases were identified. To minimize treatment selection bias, patients with an overall survival (OS) < 6 months were excluded. Cox regression identified variables associated with OS. Patients were propensity score-matched on factors associated with receipt of PCI or OS. The effect of PCI on OS was examined using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: In the overall cohort (n = 4257), treatment with PCI (n = 473) was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.74; P < .0001). Comparisons of propensity score-matched cohorts revealed a significant survival benefit for patients who received PCI in median OS (13.9 vs. 11.1 months; P < .0001), as well as 1- and 2-year OS (61.2% vs. 44.0% and 19.8% vs. 11.5%, respectively; P < .0001). This survival benefit persisted even after excluding patients who survived < 9 months (median: 15.3 vs. 12.9 months; P < .0001). In multivariable analysis, predictors of receipt of PCI were Caucasian race, younger age, and lower Charlson-Deyo score. CONCLUSION: Using a modern population-based data set, we showed that metastatic SCLC patients treated with PCI have significantly improved OS. This large retrospective study helps address the conflicting prospective data.

Patient, disease, and treatment factors associated with overall survival in esthesioneuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Esthesioneuroblastomas (ENB) are uncommon and data regarding outcomes are often limited to single-institution series. The National Cancer Database (NCDB), which contains outcomes information from treatment centers across the United States, represents an opportunity to evaluate outcomes for rare diseases such as ENB across multiple institutions. METHODS: The NCDB was queried for location codes corresponding to the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses and the histology code for ENB. Multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate for contributing factors to overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 1225 patients with ENB met the inclusion criteria. The 5-year overall survival was 76.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.4-79.0%). Overall survival was associated with Kadish stage, grade, treatment sequence, margin status, Charlson/Deyo score, age, and gender (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that, compared with surgery alone, surgery followed by radiation without chemotherapy had improved all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.95). Surgery with chemotherapy alone was associated with increased odds of all-cause mortality (OR, 4.86; 95% CI, 2.31-10.25). Multivariate subanalysis for Kadish stages A and B demonstrated no difference in survival between surgery and surgery followed by radiation, but surgery followed by chemoradiation had worse overall survival (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.07-8.56). For Kadish stage C, surgery followed by radiation had improved overall survival compared with surgery alone (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81). CONCLUSION: The most common treatment for ENB is surgery followed by radiation, which is associated with the highest overall survival. The role of adjunctive chemotherapy needs to be re-evaluated in further studies.

Minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A national perspective on oncologic outcomes and overall survival.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive (MI) gastrectomy has become increasingly common as a resection technique for gastric cancer; however, data are limited regarding peri-operative morbidity, oncologic outcomes and long-term survival, particularly in the Western patient population. STUDY DESIGN: The 2010-2012 National Cancer Data Base was queried for adult patients who underwent gastrectomy for localized, intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients were classified by surgical approach (MI vs. open gastrectomy) on an intent-to-treat basis. Groups were propensity score matched using a 1:1 nearest neighbor algorithm, and outcomes were compared. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Among 5420 patients, 1423 (26%) underwent MI gastrectomy. Following adjustment with propensity matching, all baseline characteristics were highly similar between 1175 patients in each treatment group. Between propensity-matched groups, MI gastrectomy patients had similar rates of margin-negative resections (91 vs. 90%, p = 0.447), median lymph node harvest (16 vs. 15, p = 0.104), and utilization of adjuvant therapies (28 vs. 28%, p = 0.748). MI gastrectomy was associated with shorter hospital stay (8 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001) without an increase in unplanned readmissions (7 vs. 6%, p = 0.456) or 30-day mortality (2 vs. 3%, p = 0.655). There was no difference in 3-year overall survival (50 vs. 55%, p = 0.359). CONCLUSIONS: On a national level, MI gastrectomy for gastric cancer appears to be associated with similar perioperative and long-term outcomes compared to the traditional open approach. While prospective studies remain essential, these data provide greater equipoise for ongoing trials and institutional efforts to further implement and evaluate this technique.

Prostate brachytherapy, either alone or in combination with external beam radiation, is associated with longer overall survival in men with favorable pathologic Group 4 (Gleason score 8) prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Conventional prostate cancer risk stratification results in considerable heterogeneity within each prognostic group. Men with pathologic grade Group 4 (Gleason score 8) but otherwise low-risk features have been identified as a favorable subset of high-risk prostate cancer. Given recent randomized data supporting improved cancer outcome with brachytherapy in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer, we sought to evaluate brachytherapy utilization and overall survival (OS) for these patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We queried the National Cancer Database for clinical T1c-T2a N0 M0 prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen <10 ng/mL and Gleason score 8 adenocarcinoma on biopsy. All patients received androgen deprivation therapy and either external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone, brachytherapy alone, or a combination of EBRT with brachytherapy boost (brachytherapy + EBRT). Kaplan-Meier OS estimates as well as univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed. Propensity score-matched analyses were performed to further control for baseline confounders. RESULTS: Four thousand four hundred ninety-six patients were identified with a median followup of 62.5 months (range, 2.3-119.8). Median age was 72 years (range, 41-90+). Utilization of brachytherapy decreased from 2004 to 2009. The odds ratio for brachytherapy by year (continuous variable) was 0.86 (p < 0.001). Five-year OS was 84%, 88%, and 89% for the EBRT alone, brachytherapy alone, and brachytherapy + EBRT groups, respectively. On multivariate analysis, higher median income, low comorbidity score, and treatment with brachytherapy alone (hazard ratio, 0.66; p = 0.005) or brachytherapy + EBRT (hazard ratio, 0.70; p = 0.001) remained associated with longer OS. Propensity score matching confirmed longer OS associated with either brachytherapy regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Of those men with World Health Organization pathologic grade Group 4 (Gleason score 8) prostate cancer and otherwise favorable prognostic features treated with androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy, longer OS was achieved when prostate brachytherapy was included, whether used alone or in combination with supplemental EBRT. In spite of these excellent outcomes, prostate brachytherapy utilization is declining in the United States.

Patient characterization and usage trends of proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer in the United States: A study of the National Cancer Database.

PURPOSE: To evaluate usage trends and identify factors associated with proton beam therapy (PBT) compared to alternative forms of external beam radiation therapy (RT) (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for men with localized (N0, M0) prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2013, treated with EBRT, with available data on EBRT modality (photon vs. PBT). Binary multiple logistic regression identified variables associated with EBRT modality. RESULTS: In total, 143,702 patients were evaluated with relatively few men receiving PBT (5,709 [4.0%]). Significant differences in patient and clinical characteristics were identified between those men treated with PBT compared to those treated with photon (odds ratio [OR]; 95% CI). Patients treated with PBT were generally younger (OR = 0.73; CI: 0.67-0.82), National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-risk compared to intermediate (0.71; 0.65-0.78) or high (0.44; 0.38-0.5) risk, white vs. black race (0.66; 0.58-0.77), with less comorbidity (Charlson-Deyo 0 vs. 2+; 0.70; 0.50-0.98), live in higher income counties (1.55; 1.36-1.78), and live in metropolitan areas compared to urban (0.21; 0.18-0.23) or rural (0.14; 0.10-0.19) areas. Most patients treated with PBT travelled more than 100 miles to the treatment facility. Annual PBT utilization significantly increased in both total number and percentage of EBRT over time (2.7%-5.6%; P<0.001). PBT utilization increased mostly in men classified as National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-risk (4%-10.2%). CONCLUSION: PBT for men with localized prostate cancer significantly increased in the United States from 2004 to 2013. Significant demographic and prognostic differences between those men treated with photons and protons were identified.