Exploring the Epidemiology and Survival Trends in Pediatric Major Salivary Gland Malignancies: Insights from the National Cancer Database.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinicopathological, therapeutic, and survival data on pediatric major salivary gland cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: National Cancer Database (NCDB) query from 2004 to 2018. RESULTS: In total, 967 cases of individuals under the age of 21 were identified. Most cancers affected the parotid gland (86%). Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (41.3%) and acinic cell adenocarcinoma (33.6%) were the most common. Tumors occurred more often from age 11 to 21, and females were more affected. Histology varied by age, gender, and race. In the 0-5 age group, mucoepidermoid carcinoma and myoepithelial carcinoma/sarcoma/rhabdomyosarcoma were the most common pathologies. In patients over 5 years old, mucoepidermoid carcinoma was the most frequent tumor in boys, while acinic cell adenocarcinoma was more common in girls. African American patients had a higher incidence of mucoepidermoid carcinoma, while White patients in the 0-5 age group had a higher incidence of myoepithelial carcinoma/sarcoma/rhabdomyosarcoma tumors. Low-grade tumors were commonly diagnosed at stage I, but the 0-5 age group had a high frequency of stage IV tumors. The overall 5-year survival rate was 94.9%, with 90% for the 0-5 years age group and 96% for the 11-15 years age group. Negative margins were associated with higher 5-year survival rates in high-stage tumors (93%) compared to positive margins (80%). Submandibular malignancies had worse 5-year survival rates across all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Major salivary gland malignancies in pediatric patients exhibit variations in histopathologic characteristics by age, gender, and race. Negative margins impact 5-year survival rates, especially in high-stage tumors.

Impact of salvage surgery for recurrent sinonasal cancers with skull base and intracranial involvement.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with recurrent sinonasal cancers (RSNCs) often present with extensive involvement of the skull base and exhibit high rates of subsequent recurrence and death after therapy. The impact of salvage surgery and margin status on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) has yet to be demonstrated. The goal of this study was to determine whether skull base resection with negative margins has an impact on outcomes in the recurrent setting. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 47 patients who underwent surgery for RSNC with skull base invasion between November 1993 and June 2020 was conducted. The following variables were extracted from the clinical records: patient demographic characteristics (age and sex), tumor pathology, dural and orbital invasion, and prior radiation exposure and induction chemotherapy. Metastatic disease status, surgical approach, margin status, and history of postoperative chemotherapy and/or postoperative radiation therapy were noted. The primary and secondary outcomes were PFS and OS, respectively. RESULTS: The cohort included 30 males (63.8%) and 17 females (36.2%), with a mean ± SD age of 54.8 ± 14.4 years. Thirty-five (74.5%) patients showed disease progression, and 29 (61.7%) patients died during the study period. The mean ± SD patient follow-up period was 61.8 ± 64.4 months. Dural invasion was associated with increased risk of death (HR 2.62, 95% CI 1.13-6.08). High-risk histopathology (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.10-8.95) and induction chemotherapy (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.07-5.06) were associated with increased odds of disease progression. When compared to patients with positive margins or gross-total resection with unknown margin status, those with negative margins had decreased odds of disease progression (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.63) and death (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: RSNCs show high rates of subsequent disease progression and mortality. This study demonstrated that negative margins may be associated with improved PFS and OS in carefully selected patients who have undergone salvage surgery for RSNC.

[Interest of systematic shavings to reduce reoperation in breast-conserving surgery of breast cancer]. / Intérêt des recoupes systématiques pour éviter les réinterventions dans la chirurgie conservatrice du cancer du sein.

OBJECTIVE: The INCa and HAS have developed quality and safety indicators for care specific to breast cancer. Among these, in the conservative surgery of this cancer includes the reoperation rate: target˂10%, alert>20%. The main objective of our study was to evaluate whether the practice of systematic recuts still called "shaving" would meet the objectives of the indicators. METHODS: Observational, retrospective, single-center study over two years in a regional referral center. Two groups of patients were compared: one with "shaving" and one without (no shaving or oriented shaving). RESULTS: In total, 381 patients were operated on, including 48 (12.6%) with shaving and 333 (87.4%) without. Revision rates for damaged margins were 18.75% (9/48) in the shaving group which met the quality criterias vs. 23.7% (79/333) which did not satisfy them; P=0.4. Furthermore, the rate of discovery of occult sites on recuts was higher in the shaving group: 22.9% (11/48) vs. 9.9% (33/333); P=0.02. In the shaving group, 10.4% (5/48) of the patients were resected again for damaged margins for the initial cancer vs. 18.6% (62/333) in the group without shaving; P=0.23. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the interest of performing "shaving" to meet the requirements of the INCa and HAS quality criteria. The absence of systematic cross-sectioning leads to the risk of not recognizing the existence of occult sites. However, the discovery of occult cancers does not significantly reduce the rate of repeat surgery.

What do surgeons need to know about the mesopancreas.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy is the only treatment with a promise of cure for patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, and a negative resection margin is an important factor related to overall survival. Complete clearance of the medial margin with removal of the so-called mesopancreas may decrease the recurrence rate after pancreatic resection. Here, we present some important information about the mesopancreas, total mesopancreas excision, and technical aspects to achieve negative resection margins. The area named mesopancreas is defined as the tissue located between the head of the pancreas and the superior mesenteric vessels and the celiac axis and consists of the nerve plexus, lymphatic tissue, and connective tissue. The superior mesenteric and celiac arteries define the border of the mesopancreas. En bloc resection of anterior and posterior pancreatoduodenal nodes, hepatoduodenal nodes, along the superior mesenteric artery nodes, pyloric nodes, and nodes along the common hepatic artery is necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Improved knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the region and technical refinements of excision of the mesopancreas along with standardized pathological examination are important to increase and to determine radical resection of pancreatic head cancer.

Impact of resection margin on outcomes in high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity-A USSC analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal margin of resection for high-grade extremity sarcomas and its impact on survival has long been questioned in the setting of adjuvant radiotherapy. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of resection status on recurrence and survival. METHODS: All patients with primary, nonmetastatic, high-grade extremity sarcomas that underwent surgical resection from January 2000 to April 2016 in the U.S. Sarcoma Collaborative (USSC) were retrospectively reviewed. Recurrence patterns, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were examined in multivariate analyses (MVA). RESULTS: A cohort of 959 patients was identified with a median follow-up of 34.7 months from diagnosis. R0 resection was achieved in 86.7% (831) while R1 resection in 13.3% (128). Locoregional recurrence for R0 and R1 groups occurred in 9.1% (76) versus 14.8% (19; p = .05) while distant recurrence occurred in 24.7% (205) versus 26.6% (34; p = .65), respectively. Median RFS was 171.2 versus 48.5 (p = .01) while median OS was 149.8 versus 71.5 months (p = .02) for the R0 versus R1 group, respectively. On MVA, female gender (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, p = .007) and adjuvant radiotherapy (0.7, p = .04) were associated with improved OS, whereas older age (HR = 1.03, p < .001) and tumor size (HR = 1.01, p < .001) were associated with worse OS. R0 resection status was associated with improved locoregional RFS (HR = 0.56, p = .03) but not with distant RFS (HR = 0.84, p = .4) or OS (HR = 0.7, p = .052). CONCLUSIONS: In high-grade extremity sarcomas, tumor size and gender are predictive of OS while R0 resection status is associated with improved locoregional recurrence rate without a significant impact on distant RFS or OS.

Mapping of multifocal breast cancer to achieve negative margins: A new step in the evolution of conservative breast surgery(A cohort study).

•Conservative breast surgery is the standard technique in breast cancer.•Multifocal breast cancer is a risk factor for involved margins.•Positive margins are considered one of the predictors for local recurrence.•Preoperative wire mapping after breast marking by the surgeon increase the chance to have negative margins.

Definition and Management of Positive Margins for Invasive Breast Cancer.

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiation therapy is the current standard of care for early stage breast cancer. Successful BCS necessitates complete tumor resection with clear margins at the pathologic assessment of the specimen ("no ink on tumor"). The presence of positive margins warrants additional surgery to obtain negative final margins, which has significant physical, psychological, and financial implications for the patient. The challenge lies in developing accurate real-time intraoperative margin assessment techniques to minimize the presence of "ink on tumor" and the subsequent need for additional surgery.

Importance of wide re-resection in adult spermatic cord sarcomas: Report on oncologic outcomes at a single institution.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effect of re-resection with wide margins (undertaken because initial resection performed elsewhere was incomplete) on survival in patients with spermatic cord sarcoma (SCS). METHODS: After excluding those with metastatic disease and those not undergoing surgical intervention, the records of 72 consecutive patients treated for SCS between 1981 and 2011 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were reviewed. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method for comparing between the 48 patients who underwent wide re-resection (WRR) within 5 months of diagnosis and the 24 who did not. The relationship of age, tumor size, tumor histology, adjuvant radiation, and wide re-resection with recurrence and death was assessed by univariate Cox regression. RESULTS: WRR significantly improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.16, 95%CI 0.07-0.37; P < 0.0001), despite the fact that patients receiving WRR had higher-grade disease. Tumor-positive margins upon WRR were strongly associated with both disease recurrence (HR 5.56; 95%CI 1.14-27.11, P = 0.034) and death from cancer (HR 6.16, 95%CI 1.25-30.29; P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: A WRR with negative margins is effective in the management of patients with SCS and leads to improved RFS.

Margins in breast cancer: How much is enough?

The appropriate negative margin width for women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for both ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive carcinoma is controversial. This review examines the available data on the margin status for invasive breast cancer and DCIS, and highlights the similarities and differences in tumor biology and standard treatments that affect the local recurrence (LR) risk and, therefore, the optimal surgical margin. Consensus guidelines support a negative margin, defined as no ink on tumor, for invasive carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy. Because of differences in the growth pattern and utilization of systemic therapy, a margin of 2 mm has been found to minimize the LR risk for women with DCIS undergoing lumpectomy and radiation therapy (RT). Wider negative margins do not improve local control for DCIS or invasive carcinoma when they are treated with lumpectomy and RT. Re-excision for negative margins should be individualized, and the routine practice of performing additional surgery to obtain a wider negative margin is not supported by the literature. Cancer 2018;124:1335-41. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Predictive value of basal cell carcinoma biopsies with negative margins: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pathology reports of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) biopsies often contain comments of positive or negative margins, with only 1%-2% of the margin evaluated. The negative predictive value (NPV) of biopsy margin status on residual BCC is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the NPV of BCC biopsy margin status on the absence of residual BCC in the corresponding excision. METHODS: From our institution's archives, we collected BCC biopsies with negative margin readings that had subsequent excisions. For excisions read as negative for residual BCC, the excision blocks were sectioned at 150-µm intervals until exhausted. RESULTS: We collected 143 cases that met criteria; 34 (24%) were found to contain residual BCC in the corresponding excision leading to a NPV of 76%; in 31 of 34 (91%) of these cases, the residual histologic subtype was superficial. LIMITATIONS: Our sectioning technique did not evaluate 100% of the excision specimens. CONCLUSION: Negative margins in a BCC biopsy are a poor predictor of residual disease in the patient. We recommend that clinicians treat these lesions, and that pathologists who comment on margin status of BCC biopsies consider adding a caveat to reflect these findings.

Dysplastic (or Atypical) Nevi Showing Moderate or Severe Atypia With Clear Margins on the Shave Removal Specimens Are Most Likely Completely Excised.

BACKGROUND: Dysplastic nevi (DN) are graded by their degree of atypia into 3 categories of mild, moderate, and severe. In many practices, DN with moderate or severe atypia are generally excised regardless of the status of the shave specimen margins. OBJECTIVE: With a new approach toward the margins on the shave removal specimens (SRS), the goal herein is to assess whether the shave removal procedure can sufficiently remove DN with moderate or severe atypia. METHODS: A total of 426 SRS diagnosed with DN showing moderate or severe atypia between January and December 2015 along with their post-shave excision specimens were reviewed. Based on the author's experience, clear or negative margins on the SRS were defined as neoplastic melanocytes confined within >0.2 mm of the lateral and deep specimen margins. The biopsy specimens were accompanied by Melan-A highlighting the subtle neoplastic cells. RESULTS: With a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.4% (confidence interval: 97.2% to 100%, P < .001), DN showing moderate or severe atypia with clear margins are most likely removed by the shave procedure. CONCLUSION: Routine excision of DN showing moderate or severe atypia with clear margins on SRS is not necessary. Regular surveillance is sufficient.

Synovial sarcoma of the spine: A report of three cases and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare sarcoma with distinct morphologic and genetic features, which, despite its name, does not arise from synovium. While most SSs (>80%) arise in the deep soft tissue of the extremities, up to 5% of these tumors are encountered in the body axis including the spine, mediastinum, retroperitoneum, and head/neck regions. Reports of SS located within the spinal axis have been rare to date. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the medical records at our institution and found three patients who were diagnosed and treated for SSs involving the spine. We also performed an exhaustive literature search using PubMed to identify all reported cases in the literature. RESULTS: In this study, we report on three SS cases involving the spine. All three cases involved the paraspinal muscles and spinal nerve roots, with one case having a significant leptomeningeal involvement. In two cases, "smaller operations" were performed first because the lesions were thought to be benign, however, when the final pathology identified them as SSs, more radical procedures were performed. Additionally, we identified 14 cases of SSs involving the spine published in the literature and all cases are reviewed here. CONCLUSIONS: Due to limited numbers of cases, spine SS long-term outcomes are hard to quantify. The currently accepted standard of treatment for SSs starts with wide surgical excision with negative margins followed by chemotherapy and radiation. We summarize the available literature on spinal SSs and review the current treatment options available for these tumors.

Factors associated with HPV persistence after conization in patients with negative margins.

OBJECTIVE: The clearance rate of human papillomavirus (HPV) after conization is generally high, although some HPV infections persist. We investigated the factors that affect the clearance of HPV after conization in patients with negative margins. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 77 patients (mean age 39.9 years, range 25 to 51 years) with CIN 2/3 who underwent loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) conization with negative margins. All patients had a Pap smear and high-risk (HR) HPV testing using Hybrid Capture II system and HPV DNA chip before conization. We used>/=1 relative light units (RLUs) as the cutoff for persistence of HPV after conization. RESULTS: High-risk HPV was detected in 73 of 77 (94.8%) patients before conization. At the 6-months follow-up, the high-risk HPV was eliminated in 60 of 73 (82.2%) patients. The HPV persistence rate after conization was 17.8% (13/73). Univariate analysis showed that persistent HPV infection after conization with negative margins was more likely to occur when the pretreatment viral load was high (RLU/positive control >100 (p=0.027) and the HPV was type 16 (p=0.021). Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative HPV type 16 infection was the only significant independent factor (p=0.021) for HPV persistence out of age, cytology, punch biopsy histology, HPV viral load, and conization histology. CONCLUSION: Conization effectively removes HR-HPV infection. HPV type 16 infection before conization was significantly related to HR-HPV persistence after conization with negative margins. Therefore, patients with HPV 16 infection before conization need to be followed closely.

Factors associated with HPV persistence after conization in patients with negative margins / 부인종양

OBJECTIVE: The clearance rate of human papillomavirus (HPV) after conization is generally high, although some HPV infections persist. We investigated the factors that affect the clearance of HPV after conization in patients with negative margins. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 77 patients (mean age 39.9 years, range 25 to 51 years) with CIN 2/3 who underwent loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) conization with negative margins. All patients had a Pap smear and high-risk (HR) HPV testing using Hybrid Capture II system and HPV DNA chip before conization. We used> or =1 relative light units (RLUs) as the cutoff for persistence of HPV after conization. RESULTS: High-risk HPV was detected in 73 of 77 (94.8%) patients before conization. At the 6-months follow-up, the high-risk HPV was eliminated in 60 of 73 (82.2%) patients. The HPV persistence rate after conization was 17.8% (13/73). Univariate analysis showed that persistent HPV infection after conization with negative margins was more likely to occur when the pretreatment viral load was high (RLU/positive control >100 (p=0.027) and the HPV was type 16 (p=0.021). Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative HPV type 16 infection was the only significant independent factor (p=0.021) for HPV persistence out of age, cytology, punch biopsy histology, HPV viral load, and conization histology. CONCLUSION: Conization effectively removes HR-HPV infection. HPV type 16 infection before conization was significantly related to HR-HPV persistence after conization with negative margins. Therefore, patients with HPV 16 infection before conization need to be followed closely.