Supinator to Anterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer to Restore Finger Flexion in Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nerve Injury.

PURPOSE: Restoration of pinch and grasp is a chief concern of patients with cervical spinal cord injury or peripheral nerve injury involving the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN). We hypothesize that supinator nerve-to-AIN (Sup-AIN) nerve transfer is a viable option for AIN neurotization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who received Sup-AIN. Reported outcomes included Medical Research Council strength of the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus and passive range of digit motion. Patients with <12 months of follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent Sup-AIN, eight with peripheral nerve injury, and three with spinal cord injury. Three patients were excluded because of insufficient follow-up. Average follow-up was 17 months (range: 12-25 months). Six patients had M4 recovery (75%), one patient had M3 recovery (12.5%), and one did not recover function because of severe stiffness (12.5%). We observed no complications or donor site morbidity in our patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Sup-AIN nerve transfer is an effective option to restore digital flexion in patients with peripheral nerve injury or spinal cord injury involving the AIN motor distribution. In comparison to previously described extensor carpi radialis brevis to AIN and brachialis to AIN nerve transfers, Sup-AIN offers the benefits of a more expendable donor nerve and shorter regenerative distance, respectively. The one failed Sup-AIN in our series highlights the importance of patient selection. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

The prerequisites and clinical outcomes of ipsilateral C7 nerve root transfer to the upper trunk for adult C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries.

PURPOSE: Although ipsilateral C7 nerve transfer is used for the treatment of C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries, accurately evaluating the functional quality of the donor nerve (ipsilateral C7 nerve root) is difficult, especially when the C7 nerve root is slightly injured. The purpose of this study was to determine the indicators to evaluate the quality of the ipsilateral C7 nerve and assess the clinical outcomes of this procedure. METHODS: This study employed the following three indicators to assess the quality of the ipsilateral C7 nerve: (1) the muscle strength and electrophysiological status of the latissimus dorsi, triceps brachii, and extensor digitorum communis; (2) the sensibility of the radial three digits, especially the index finger; and (3) the intraoperative appearance, feel and electrophysiological status of the ipsilateral C7 nerve root. Transfer of the ipsilateral C7 nerve root to the upper trunk was implemented only when the following three tests were conducted, the criteria were met, and the clinical outcomes were assessed in eight patients with C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries. RESULTS: Patients were followed-up for an average of 90 ± 42 months. At the final follow-up, all eight patients achieved recovery of elbow flexion, with five and three patients scoring M4 and M3, respectively, according to the Medical Research Council scoring. The shoulder abduction range of motor recovery averaged 86 ± 47° (range, 30°-170°), whereas the shoulder external rotation averaged 51 ± 26° (range, 15°-90°). CONCLUSION: Ipsilateral C7 nerve transfer is a reliable and effective option for the functional reconstruction of the shoulder and elbow after C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries when the three prerequisites are met.

Alternative Nerve Coaptations: End-To-Side and Beyond.

Modern end-to-side (ETS) nerve transfers have undergone several permutations since the early 1990's. Preclinical data have revealed important mechanisms and patterns of donor axon outgrowth into the recipient nerves and target reinnervation. The versatility of ETS nerve transfers can also potentially address several processes that limit functional recovery after nerve injury by babysitting motor end-plates and/or supporting the regenerative environment within the denervated nerve. Further clinical and basic science work is required to clarify the ideal clinical indications, contraindications, and mechanisms of action for these techniques in order to maximize their potential as reconstructive options.

Surgical Reconstruction of Elbow Extension in Spinal Cord Injury and Tetraplegia: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: Surgical reconstruction of elbow extension can help restore function in patients with tetraplegia and triceps paralysis because of spinal cord injury. Both posterior deltoid-to-triceps tendon transfer and transfer of the branch of the axillary nerve to the triceps motor branch of the radial nerve have been described for triceps reanimation. This systematic review aimed at reviewing current evidence in the two schools of surgery in terms of their outcome and complication profile. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE (1974-2023) and EMBASE (1946-2023) databases. The keyword terms "elbow extension," "triceps," "deltoid," "nerve transfer," "spinal cord injury," "tetraplegia," "quadriplegia," and "tetraplegic" were used in the initial search, which was supplemented with manual searches of the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Results: Twenty studies met our inclusion criteria, with 14 studies (229 limbs) on posterior deltoid-to-triceps tendon transfer, 5 studies (23 limbs) on axillary to radial nerve transfer, and 1 study (1 limb) on combined transfer. For the tendon transfer group, the majority of studies reported a median triceps power of grade 3, with a wide range of failure percentage to reach antigravity (0% to 87.5%). Common complications included gradual stretching of the musculotendinous unit, rupture of the tendon transferred, elbow contracture, and infection. For the nerve transfer group, the majority of studies also reported a median triceps power reaching grade 3. There were no reported complications or loss of power in donor action of shoulder abduction or external rotation. Conclusions: Transfer of the axillary nerve branch to the triceps motor branch of the radial nerve in tetraplegia shows promising results, with comparable triceps muscle power compared to traditional tendon transfer and a low incidence of complication. Type of Study/Level of Evidence: Systematic Review III.

Thoracodorsal to long thoracic nerve transfer in a patient with traumatic injury: A case report.

Background: Traumatic injury to the long thoracic nerve causes paralysis of the serratus muscle, clinically expressed as winged scapula and functional impairment of the shoulder girdle. Treatment varies according to the severity of the injury, with a focus on early intervention for best results; however, the therapeutic approach remains a challenge at present. Case Description: We present the case of a 32-year-old male patient, athlete, right-handed, presented with bilateral paresis predominantly in the right arm, associated with paresthesia and changes in the coloring of the upper limbs. After being diagnosed with Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and undergoing surgery, vascular symptoms persisted with a significant loss of strength in the right shoulder. Winged scapula was observed and structural lesions were excluded on magnetic resonance imaging. Electromyographic studies confirmed the presumption of traumatic nerve involvement of the long thoracic nerve. Notwithstanding 6 months of physical therapy, there was no improvement, so a nerve transfer from the thoracodorsal nerve to the right long thoracic nerve was chosen. At 12 months, complete resolution of the winged scapula and functional recovery were observed. The patient also experienced a decrease in preoperative pain from 5/10 to 2/10 on the visual analog scale. Conclusion: Nerve transfer from the thoracodorsal nerve to the long thoracic nerve is a safe and effective technique to treat winged scapula due to long thoracic nerve injury.

Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic in Patients with a Previous Phrenic Nerve Transfer for a Traumatic Brachial Plexus Palsy.

Background With the advent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, some doubts have been raised regarding the potential respiratory problems that patients who previously underwent a phrenic nerve transfer could have. Objectives To analyze the effects of the coronavirus infection on two populations, one from Argentina and another from Taiwan. Specific objectives were: (1) to identify the rate of COVID in patients with a history of phrenic nerve transfer for treatment of palsy; (2) to identify the overall symptom profile; (3) to compare Argentinian versus Taiwanese populations; and (4) to determine if any phrenic nerve transfer patients are at particular risk of more severe COVID. Methods A telephonic survey that included data regarding the number of episodes of acute COVID-19 infection, the symptoms it caused, the presence or absence of potential or life-threatening complications, and the status of COVID-19 vaccination were studied. Intergroup comparisons were conducted using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, with categorical variables conducted using either the Pearson χ2 analysis or the Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Results A total of 77 patients completed the survey, 40 from Taiwan and 37 from Argentina. Fifty-five (71.4%) developed a diagnosis of COVID. However, among these, only four had any level of dyspnea reported (4/55 = 7.3%), all mild. There were also no admissions to hospital or an intensive care unit, no intubations, and no deaths. All 55 patients isolated themselves at home. Conclusions It can be concluded that an acute COVID-19 infection was very well tolerated in our patients. (Level of evidence 3b, case reports).

Functional Outcome following Phrenic Nerve Transfer in Brachial Plexus Injury.

Background: Brachial plexus injuries are debilitating injuries resulting in paralyzed shoulder to global paralysis of the upper extremity. Treatment strategies have evolved over the years with nerve transfer forming the mainstay of surgical management. Phrenic nerve provides certain advantages as donor over other options but has been less preferred due to fear of pulmonary complications. In this study, we assess the functional outcomes of phrenic nerve transfer in brachial plexus injuries. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 18 patients operated between 2012 and 2017. The mean duration of injury to surgery was 4.56 months and mean follow-up was for 3.66 years. Phrenic nerve was used as donor to neurotize either biceps and brachialis branch of musculocutaneous nerve or suprascapular nerve. Assessment was done through Waikakul score for elbow flexion and Medical Research Council grading for shoulder abduction. Respiratory function assessment was done through questionnaire. Results: Twelve (80%) patients recovered grade 3 and above elbow flexion with 6 patients having a positive endurance test according to Waikakul and a "very good" result. In phrenic to suprascapular transfer group (3 patients), all patients had more than grade 3 recovery of shoulder abduction. No patient complained of respiratory problems. Conclusion: Phrenic nerve can be used as a reliable donor with suitable patient selection with good results in regaining muscle power without any anticipated effects on respiratory function.

Surgery for mononeuropathies.

Advancement in microsurgical techniques and innovative approaches including greater use of nerve and tendon transfers have resulted in better peripheral nerve injury (PNI) surgical outcomes. Clinical evaluation of the patient and their injury factors along with a shift toward earlier time frame for intervention remain key. A better understanding of the pathophysiology and biology involved in PNI and specifically mononeuropathies along with advances in ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging allow us, nowadays, to provide our patients with a logical and sophisticated approach. While functional outcomes are constantly being refined through different surgical techniques, basic scientific concepts are being advanced and translated to clinical practice on a continuous basis. Finally, a combination of nerve transfers and technological advances in nerve/brain and machine interfaces are expanding the scope of nerve surgery to help patients with amputations, spinal cord, and brain lesions.

Nerve transfer for upper extremity reanimation in people with spinal cord injury: A 2-year follow-up case series.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the 2-year functional outcomes of nerve transfer (NT) for upper extremity reanimation. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective case series. SETTING: A highly specialized rehabilitation hospital for spinal cord injury (SCI) in Italy. INTERVENTION: Upper limb nerve transfer (32 NTs, 15 upper limbs). PARTICIPANTS: Twelve male individuals with traumatic SCI (AIS A or B, neurological level from C4 to C7) were enrolled; 24-month follow-up data were available for 11. OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated the strength recovery of recipient muscles through the Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength. Upper limb function and independence were assessed with the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) test version 1 and the Spinal Cord Independent Measure III (SCIM III). Patient satisfaction was also evaluated. RESULTS: After 24 months, median MRC scores (range) were: triceps 2 (1-2); extensor digitorum communis 3 (1-4); extensor pollicis longus 2.5 (1-4); flexor digitorum profundus 2 (0-4); flexor pollicis longus 2 (0-4). No complication occurred. GRASSP prehension ability and prehension performance total scores significantly improved at 24 months from 1 (0-4) to 2 (0-7) and from 1 (0-8) to 5 (0--22), respectively. The SCIM III self-care sub-scale score improved at 24-month follow-up (p = 0.009).This study has important limitations, including a limited generalizability of the results and a small sample size that does not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn. A large multicenter prospective study is needed to confirm our findings. CONCLUSIONS: NT represents a functional surgery option with few complications for the resuscitation of upper limbs in persons with tetraplegia.

Management of C5 Palsy After Anterior Cervical Decompression Using Oberlin Nerve Transfer: A Case Report.

C5 palsy is a potential complication of cervical decompression surgery from which many patients do not recover or partially recover function. We present the case of a 48-year-old patient who developed elbow flexion paralysis after anterior decompression surgery with fusion of the C5-C7 levels. Muscle function was not spontaneously restored until eight months after surgery. In this case, we performed an Oberlin procedure to restore the function of the arm. Muscle strength (5/5) and volume were obtained 13 months after surgery. A reasonable waiting period is required after C5 palsy in case spontaneous recovery occurs. Treatment decision should be based on the patient's symptoms. Nerve transfers have been shown to be effective when performed after six months, especially in Oberlin transfer.

Self-assessed outcomes following double fascicular nerve transfer for elbow flexion.

Background: Double fascicular nerve transfer (DFT) is often performed to re-animate the elbow flexors. Studies of motor recovery following this surgery have exclusively reported on the objective outcome of muscle power. Questionnaire studies allow researchers and clinicians to learn from patients and better direct care towards their needs. To date, no research has focused on self-assessed recovery following DFT for elbow flexion. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study aimed to give an account of patient-assessed outcomes following DFT. The bespoke questionnaire included: (a) self-reported strength and (b) the Stanmore percentage of normal elbow assessment. Results: Sixty-two patients participated in the study. Participants were grouped according to time post-surgery. Statistical analysis confirmed that data were comparable between groups (p=0.10). Self-assessed strength: Median scores were 0.5 kg <2 years post-surgery, 3 kg at 2 to 5 years, 2 kg at 5 to 8 years and 1.3 kg in the >8 years group. Stanmore Percentage of Normal Elbow Assessment: Mean scores (%) were 35 (SD ± 25) <2 years, 56 (SD ± 31) at 2 to 5 years, 44 (SD ± 25) at 5 to 8 years and 46 (SD ± 29) >8 years groups. Conclusions: This is the first study of self-assessed recovery following DFT. Scores peaked around 4 years post-operation. Future research should focus on the long-term self-reported outcome of nerve transfer surgery.

Nerve-Targeted Surgical Treatments for Spasticity: A Narrative Review.

Spasticity is a potentially debilitating symptom of various acquired and congenital neurologic pathologies that, without adequate treatment, may lead to long-term disability, compromise functional independence, and negatively impact mental health. Several conservative as well as non-nerve targeted surgical strategies have been developed for the treatment of spasticity, but these may be associated with significant drawbacks, such as adverse side effects to medication, device dependence on intrathecal baclofen pumps, and inadequate relief with tendon-based procedures. In these circumstances, patients may benefit from nerve-targeted surgical interventions such as (i) selective dorsal rhizotomy, (ii) hyperselective neurectomy, and (iii) nerve transfer. When selecting the appropriate surgical approach, preoperative patient characteristics, as well as the risks and benefits of nerve-targeted surgical intervention, must be carefully evaluated. Here, we review the current evidence on the efficacy of these nerve-targeted surgical approaches for treating spasticity across various congenital and acquired neurologic pathologies.

Supercharge end-to-side nerve transfer from anterior interosseous nerve to augment intrinsic recovery in high ulnar nerve injuries of varying magnitudes.

BACKGROUND: High ulnar nerve injuries result in intrinsic muscle weakness and are inconvenient for patients. Moreover, conventional surgical techniques often fail to achieve satisfactory motor recovery. A potential reconstructive solution in the form of the supercharge end-to-side (SETS) anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) transfer method has emerged. Therefore, this study aims to compare surgical outcomes of patients with transected and in-continuity high ulnar nerve lesions following SETS AIN transfer. METHODS: Between June 2015 and May 2023, patients with high ulnar palsy in the form of transection injuries or lesion-in-continuity were recruited. The assessment encompassed several objective results, including grip strength, key pinch strength, compound muscle action potential, sensory nerve action potential, and two-point discrimination tests. The muscle power of finger abduction and adduction was also recorded. Additionally, subjective questionnaires were utilized to collect data on patient-reported outcomes. Overall, the patients were followed up for up to 2 years. RESULTS: Patients with transected high ulnar nerve lesions exhibited worse baseline performance than those with lesion-in-continuity, including motor and sensory functions. However, they experienced greater motor improvement but less sensory recovery, resulting in comparable final motor outcomes in both groups. In contrast, the transection group showed worse sensory outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that SETS AIN transfer benefits patients with high ulnar nerve palsy, regardless of the lesion type. Nonetheless, improvements may be more pronounced in patients with transected lesions.

Outcomes of Nerve Transfers in Peroneal Nerve Palsy.

Background: The objective of this work is to: (i) evaluate the postoperative outcomes after lower extremity nerve transfer (LENT) in patients with peroneal nerve palsy, and (ii) evaluate the patient and surgical factors that best predict successful restoration of ankle dorsiflexion following nerve transfer. Methods: A retrospective cohort of prospectively collected data included all patients who underwent LENT (2010-2018). Two independent reviewers performed data collection. Primary outcome measures were: (i) clinically with British Medical Research Council (MRC) strength assessments, and (ii) electrodiagnostically with nascent motor unit potentials. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive and nonparametric statistics. Results: Nine patients (56% male, mean age 38.3, range 18-57 years) underwent LENT surgery a mean of 4.3 months following injury (range 2.2-6.4 months). Mean follow-up was 15.6 months (range 9.1-28.2 months). Postoperatively, ankle dorsiflexion (P = .015) and ankle eversion (P = .041) increased significantly. After surgery, 44% achieved MRC 4, 33% obtained MRC 1 motor recovery, and 22% sustained MRC 0. A shorter time to surgery was associated with significantly better outcomes (P = .049). Conclusions: It appears that there is a bimodal distribution between responders and nonresponders to LENT for foot drop. Further research is required to elucidate patient and surgical factors that prognosticate success.

Contexte: Les objectifs de cette étude étaient les suivants : (i) évaluer les résultats postopératoires après un transfert de nerf dans le membre inférieur (LENT; lower extremity nerve transfer) chez des patients ayant une paralysie du nerf péronier et (ii) évaluer les facteurs propres au patient et à la chirurgie qui permettent de prédire le mieux possible le succès d'une restauration de la dorsiflexion de la cheville après le transfert nerveux. Méthodes: Une cohorte rétrospective de données collectées de façon prospective a inclus tous les patients ayant bénéficié d'un LENT de 2010 à 2018. Deux réviseurs indépendants ont réalisé la collecte des données. Les critères de jugement principaux étaient les suivants : (i) cliniques avec des évaluations de la force selon l'échelle MRC et (ii) électrodiagnostiques avec potentiels d'unités motrices naissantes. Une analyse statistique a été réalisée au moyen de statistiques descriptives et non paramétriques. Résultats: Neuf patients (hommes : 56%, âge moyen : 38,3 ans, extrêmes : 18 à 57 ans) ont subi une LENT, en moyenne 4,3 mois après une blessure (extrêmes : 2,2 à 6,4 mois). Le suivi moyen a été de 15,6 mois (extrêmes : 9,1 à 28,2 mois). En postopératoire, la dorsiflexion de la cheville (P = 015) et l'éversion de la cheville (P = 041) ont augmenté de façon significative. Après l'intervention chirurgicale, 44% des patients ont atteint un score de 4 sur l'échelle MRC, 33% ont obtenu une récupération motrice cotée à 1 et 22% ont conservé une cote MRC de 0. Un délai plus court avant la chirurgie a été associé à des résultats significativement meilleurs (P = .049). Conclusions: Il semble y avoir une répartition bimodale entre les répondeurs et les nonrépondeurs à la chirurgie de LENT pour la chute du pied. Des recherches supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour renseigner les facteurs pronostiques de succès liés au patient et à l'intervention chirurgicale.

Contralateral C7 nerve transfer in the treatment of central hemiplegia after stroke under general anesthesia: A case report.

Similar reports in the past pay less attention to the anesthetic management of these patients. We reported a 46-year-old man who suffered from hypertensive cerebral apoplexy 5 months ago and accepted C7 nerve transfer to improve the central spastic paralysis in the right upper limb. After careful evaluation and anesthesia management before anesthesia, the operation was successfully completed under general anesthesia. The patient was cured and discharged without complications. The anesthesia management of C7 nerve transfer should choose appropriate operation opportunities for patients according to the type of stroke, improve the preoperative preparation, and form a multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment.

Current perspectives on peripheral nerve repair and management of the nerve gap.

From the first surgical repair of a nerve in the 6th century, progress in the field of peripheral nerve surgery has marched on; at first slowly but today at great pace. Whether performing primary neurorrhaphy or managing multiple large nerve defects, the modern nerve surgeon has an extensive range of tools, techniques and choices available to them. Continuous innovation in surgical equipment and technique has enabled the maturation of autografting as a gold standard for reconstruction and welcomed the era of nerve transfer techniques all while bioengineers have continued to add to our armamentarium with implantable devices, such as conduits and acellular allografts. We provide the reader a concise and up-to-date summary of the techniques available to them, and the evidence base for their use when managing nerve transection including current use and applicability of nerve transfer procedures.

A bibliometric analysis of brachial plexus injury from 1980 to 2022.

Background: Brachial plexus injury is a common severe peripheral nerve injury with high disability. At present, the bibliometric analysis of brachial plexus injury is basically unknown. Methods: This article analyzes the data retrieved to the web of science and uses the R language (version 4.2), Citespace (version 6.1.R3 Advanced), Vosviewer (Lei deng university) to make a scientific map. Specifically, we analyze the main publication countries, institutions, journals where the article is published, and the cooperative relationship between different institutions, the relationship between authors, main research directions in this field, and current research hotspots. Results: From 1980 to 2022, the total number of publications is 1542. In terms of countries where articles were published, 551 records were published in the United States, accounting for 35% of the total. With 74 articles, Fudan University ranks first in the world in terms of the number of articles issued by the institution, followed by 72 articles from Mayo Clinic. The magazine with the largest number of articles is JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, which has published 87 articles in total. GU YD (Gu Yu-Dong) team (Fudan University) and spinner RJ (Robert J Spinner) team (Mayo clinic) are in a leading position in this field. Nerve transfer and nerve reconstruction have been a hot topic of brachial plexus injury. "Spinal nerve root repair and reimplantation of avulsed ventral roots into the spinal cord after brachial plexus injury" has the strongest citation bursts. Conclusion: Research on brachial plexus injury shows a trend of increasing heat. At present, there is a lack of communication and cooperation between scholars from different countries. Nerve transfer and nerve reconstruction are the current and future research directions in the treatment of brachial plexus injury.

Tibial nerve branching pattern and compatibility of branches for the deep fibular nerve.

PURPOSE: In individuals who develop drop foot due to nerve loss, several methods such as foot-leg orthosis, tendon transfer, and nerve grafting are used. Nerve transfer, on the other hand, has been explored in recent years. The purpose of this study was to look at the tibial nerve's branching pattern and the features of its branches in order to determine the suitability of the tibial nerve motor branches, particularly the plantaris muscle motor nerve, for deep fibular nerve transfer. METHODS: There were 36 fixed cadavers used. Tibial nerve motor branches were observed and measured, as were the lengths, distributions, and thicknesses of the common fibular nerve and its branches at the bifurcation region. RESULT: The motor branches of the tibial nerve that supply the soleus muscle, lateral head, and medial head of the gastrocnemius were studied, and three distinct forms of distribution were discovered. The motor branch of the gastrocnemius medial head was commonly observed as the first branch to divide, and it appeared as a single root. The nerve of the plantaris muscle was shown to be split from many origins. When the thickness and length of the motor branches measured were compared, the nerve of the soleus muscle was determined to be the most physically suited for neurotization. CONCLUSION: In today drop foot is very common. Traditional methods of treatment are insufficient. Nerve transfer is viewed as an application that can both improve patient outcomes and hasten the patient's return to society. The nerve of the soleus muscle was shown to be the best candidate for transfer in our investigation.

Advancing glenohumeral dysplasia treatment in brachial plexus birth injury: the end-to-side spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer technique.

PURPOSE: Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) is a common injury with the spectrum of disease prognosis ranging from spontaneous recovery to lifelong debilitating disability. A common sequela of BPBI is glenohumeral dysplasia (GHD) which, if not addressed early on, can lead to shoulder dysfunction as the child matures. However, there are no clear criteria for when to employ various surgical procedures for the correction of GHD. METHODS: We describe our approach to correcting GDH in infants with BPBIs using a reverse end-to-side (ETS) transfer from the spinal accessory to the suprascapular nerve. This technique is employed in infants that present with GHD with poor external rotation (ER) function who would not necessitate a complete end-to-end transfer and are still too young for a tendon transfer. In this study, we present our outcomes in seven patients. RESULTS: At presentation, all patients had persistent weakness of the upper trunk and functional limitations of the shoulder. Point-of-care ultrasounds confirmed GHD in each case. Five patients were male, and two patients were female, with a mean age of 3.3 months age (4 days-7 months) at presentation. Surgery was performed on average at 5.8 months of age (3-8.6 months). All seven patients treated with a reverse ETS approach had full recovery of ER according to active movement scores at the latest follow-up. Additionally, ultrasounds at the latest follow-up showed a complete resolution of GHD. CONCLUSION: In infants with BPBI and evidence of GHD with poor ER, end-to-end nerve transfers, which initially downgrade function, or tendon transfers, that are not age-appropriate for the patient, are not recommended. Instead, we report seven successful cases of infants who underwent ETS spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for the treatment of GHD following BPBI.

Compressive median neuropathy caused by brachial artery pseudoaneurysm.

Background: Brachial artery pseudoaneurysms (PSAs) are a rare complication of trauma and medical intervention, estimated to constitute 0.3-0.7% of all PSAs. Although neurologic symptoms are common in patients undergoing hemodialysis, direct nerve compression by large PSAs is rare. Case Description: We report a case of median nerve compression by a brachial artery PSA treated by PSA resection and distal nerve transfer of the extensor carpi radialis brevis nerve to the anterior interosseous nerve. Conclusion: This case illustrates the successful use of distal nerve transfers for the treatment of median neuropathy secondary to brachial PSA. In addition, this case highlights the importance of imaging before any exploratory nerve surgery in the setting of a mass and/or prior vascular procedure. Embarking on a nerve release/ repair surgery in the absence of a vascular surgeon would be disastrous.