A Comprehensive Review of the Celiac Plexus Block for the Management of Chronic Abdominal Pain.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a significant health problem that can dramatically affect quality of life and survival. Pancreatic cancer is recognized as one of the most painful malignancies with 70-80% suffering from substantial pain, often unresponsive to typical medical management. Celiac plexus neurolysis and celiac plexus block (CPB) can be performed to mitigate pain through direct destruction or blockade of visceral afferent nerves. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review of the CPB as it pertains to CAP with a focus on the associated anatomy, indications, techniques, neurolysis/blocking agents, and complications observed in patients who undergo CPB for the treatment of CAP. RECENT FINDINGS: The CAP is difficult to manage due to lack of precision in diagnosis and limited evidence from available treatments. CAP can arise from both benign and malignant causes. Treatment options include pharmacologic, interventional, and biopsychosocial treatments. Opioid therapy is typically utilized for the treatment of CAP; however, opioid therapy is associated with multiple complications. CPB has successfully been used to treat a variety of conditions resulting in CAP. The majority of the literature specifically related to CPB is surrounding chronic pain associated with pancreatic cancer. The literature shows emerging evidence in managing CAP with CPB, specifically in pancreatic cancer. This review provides multiple aspects of CAP and CPB, including anatomy, medical necessity, indications, technical considerations, available evidence, and finally complications related to the management.

Complementary Role of Intervention Radiology in Palliative Care in Oncology Setting.

Owing to advances in treatment of cancer, there has been increase in life expectancy. Palliative care aims at improving quality of life of patients suffering from malignancy and is now recognized as a separate subspecialty. Management of cancer patients needs a multidisciplinary approach, and radiology has a key role to play at every step of it. Interventional radiology has broadened its scope immensely over the last decade with development of newer and less invasive applications useful in oncology and palliative care. The role of interventional radiologists begins from obtaining tissue for histopathological examination and extends to controlling disease spread with ablation or chemoembolization, to managing the tumor-related complications and relieving stressful symptoms such as dyspnea and pain. This article aims to review the interventional radiologist's arsenal in managing patients with malignancies with a special emphasis on palliative care, providing a more holistic approach in improving the quality of life of cancer patients.

New Cancer Pain Treatment Options.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cancer pain is often incapacitating and discouraging to patients; is demoralizing to family members and care takers; and is taxing and difficult to subdue for the pain specialists. The consequences of implementing suboptimal treatment are far-reaching; therefore, effective treatment methods are in a great demand. The face of cancer pain management has changed in considerable ways, and interventional procedures have become an integral part of providing multimodal analgesia in cancer pain treatment. The goals of this review are to draw attention to the critical role that regional anesthetic nerve blocks and interventional pain management techniques play in treating malignancy-related pain and emphasize the benefits provided by the aforementioned treatment strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: A large proportion of cancer patients continues to struggle with an inadequately treated pain despite a strict adherence to the WHO analgesic step ladder. The previous pain treatment algorithm has been modified to include peripheral neural blockade, neuro-destructive techniques, neuromodulatory device use, and intrathecal drug delivery systems. The accumulated evidence highlights the opioid-sparing qualities and other benefits afforded by these modalities: decreasing medication-induced side effects, reducing economic burden of poor analgesia, and overall improvement in quality of life of the patients afflicted with a painful neoplastic disease. The rising prevalence of cancer-related pain syndromes is paralleled by an unmatched growth of innovative treatment strategies. Modified WHO analgesic ladder represents one of the greatest paradigm shifts within the domain of oncologic pain treatment. The cancer patient population requires a prompt and liberal, albeit judicious, delivery of unorthodox pain treatment options freed from the rigid bonds of conventional guidelines and standard practices.

Invasive treatment to control neuropathic pain / Tratamento invasivo para o controle da dor neuropática

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Distress, allied to neuropathic pain persistence and its refractory nature, often leads patients to accept invasive procedures. Neuropathic pain control is a major medical challenge requiring approaches and decisions especially based on effectiveness, risks and costs. This study aimed at reviewing these aspects related to major invasive procedures. CONTENTS: Major invasive procedures to control neuropathic pain are presented. Initially, classically reversible anesthetic blocks; then invasive neuromodulation techniques using electric current application and the magnetic field generated by it becomes a target to be stimulated, inhibited or modified in the nervous system (central, peripheral or autonomic); and, finally, ablative procedures including anesthetic methods administering neurolytic agents rather than anesthetics and neurosurgeries using different methods to injure the nervous system to control painful neuropathic discomfort. CONCLUSION: Patients eligible to invasive procedures to control neuropathic pain have, in addition to pain itself, a mixed distress including the collection of repeated delusions at every treatment failure. They have reserved prognosis with regard to total cure and, unfortunately, relieve obtained with invasive treatment in general does not reach persistent and high rates. In such adverse situation, these partial results of decreasing original pain intensity may be interpreted as acceptable, provided the impact on final quality of life is positive. Maybe, the rare exceptions are good results obtained with typical idiopathic/cryptogenic neuralgias ironically excluded from the stricter interpretation of the new pathophysiologic classification of neuropathic pains.

RESUMO JUSTFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O sofrimento aliado à persistência e refratariedade da dor neuropática frequentemente leva seu portador a aceitar tratamentos invasivos. O controle da dor neuropática representa um desafio médico importante necessitando adoção de condutas e decisões baseadas, principalmente, em efetividade, riscos e custos. O escopo deste estudo foi a revisão desses aspectos relacionados aos principais procedimentos invasivos CONTEÚDO: São apresentados os principais procedimentos invasivos utilizados para o controle da dor neuropática. Inicialmente, os bloqueios anestésicos, classicamente reversíveis; depois as técnicas de neuromodulação invasiva que utilizam a aplicação de corrente elétrica e o campo magnético por ela gerado em alvos a serem estimulados, inibidos ou modificados, no sistema nervoso (central, periférico ou autônomo); e, finalmente, os procedimentos ablativos que incluem os métodos anestésicos que administram agentes neurolíticos ao invés de anestésicos, e, as neurocirurgias que utilizam métodos diversos de produção de lesões no sistema nervoso para o controle do desconforto doloroso neuropático. CONCLUSÃO: Os pacientes que se apresentam como candidatos a receberem indicações de procedimentos invasivos para controle de dores neuropáticas, possuem além do inerente à própria dor, sofrimento misto, que inclui a coleção de desilusões reiteradas a cada insucesso de tratamento. Possuem prognóstico reservado no que tange a plena cura, e, infelizmente, o alívio obtido com o tratamento invasivo, em geral, não atinge taxas persistentes e elevadas. Nessa situação tão adversa esses resultados parciais de redução da intensidade da dor original possam ser interpretados como aceitáveis desde que o impacto na qualidade de vida final seja positivo. Talvez, as raras exceções, recaiam sobre os bons resultados obtidos com as neuralgias típicas, idiopáticas/criptogenéticas, ironicamente, excluídas da interpretação mais rígida da nova classificação fisiopatológica das dores neuropáticas.