RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There are limited global data on ectopic pregnancy (EP) and molar pregnancy (MP), making it important to understand their epidemiology and management across different regions. Our study aimed to describe their prevalence for both conditions, severity of their complications and management among women in selected health facilities across 17 countries in Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the WHO multi-country survey on abortion. Data were collected from 280 healthcare facilities across 11 countries in Africa and 6 in LAC. Sociodemographic information, signs and symptoms, management and clinical outcomes were extracted from medical records. Facility-level data on post-abortion care (PAC) capabilities were also collected, and facilities were classified accordingly. χ2 or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical data. RESULTS: The total number of women with EP and MP across both regions was 9.9% (2 415/24 424) where EP accounted for 7.8% (1 904/24 424) and MP for 2.1% (511/24 424). EP presented a higher severity of complications than MP. At admission, 49.8% of EP had signs of peritoneal irritation. The most common surgical management for EP was laparotomy (87.2%) and for MP, uterine evacuation (89.8%). Facilities with higher scores in infrastructure and capability to provide PAC more frequently provided minimal invasive management using methotrexate/other medical treatment (34.9%) and laparoscopy (5.1%). CONCLUSION: In Africa and LAC, EP and MP cause significant maternal morbidity and mortality. The disparity in the provision of good quality care highlights the need to strengthen the implementation of evidence-based recommendations in the clinical and surgical management of EP and MP.
Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Mola Hidatiforme , Gravidez Ectópica , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , América Latina/epidemiologia , África/epidemiologia , Região do Caribe/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Adulto , Prevalência , Gravidez Ectópica/epidemiologia , Gravidez Ectópica/terapia , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Mola Hidatiforme/epidemiologia , Mola Hidatiforme/terapia , Mola Hidatiforme/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem , AdolescenteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence models are increasingly gaining popularity among patients and healthcare professionals. While it is impossible to restrict patient's access to different sources of information on the Internet, healthcare professional needs to be aware of the content-quality available across different platforms. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy and completeness of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) in addressing frequently asked questions related to the management and treatment of female urinary incontinence (UI), compared to recommendations from guidelines. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Two researchers developed 14 frequently asked questions related to UI. Then, they were inserted into the ChatGPT platform on September 16, 2023. The accuracy (scores from 1 to 5) and completeness (score from 1 to 3) of ChatGPT's answers were assessed individually by two experienced researchers in the Women's Health field, following the recommendations proposed by the guidelines for UI. RESULTS: Most of the answers were classified as "more correct than incorrect" (n = 6), followed by "incorrect information than correct" (n = 3), "approximately equal correct and incorrect" (n = 2), "near all correct" (n = 2, and "correct" (n = 1). Regarding the appropriateness, most of the answers were classified as adequate, as they provided the minimum information expected to be classified as correct. CONCLUSION: These results showed an inconsistency when evaluating the accuracy of answers generated by ChatGPT compared by scientific guidelines. Almost all the answers did not bring the complete content expected or reported in previous guidelines, which highlights to healthcare professionals and scientific community a concern about using artificial intelligence in patient counseling.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound estimates of fetal weight made by residents. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on consecutive pregnancies attended in an obstetric ward. All participants provided their consent to participate. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with ultrasound evaluation and delivery within 14 days. Congenital abnormalities and stillbirths were excluded. Ultrasound scans were performed by two residents, one observer per subject, following standardized methodology and supervised by senior staff. Fetal weight was calculated using the four-parameter Hadlock 1985 formula. Birth weight was measured using a standard clinical scale. Bland-Altman and mixed-effects analyses were performed. RESULTS: In a 6-month period, 95 gestations were recruited at 30-41 weeks, and birth weights ranged from 1200 to 4080 g. The bias between methods was -28 g (CI95%, -74 to 18) with 95% limits of agreement of ±440 g. The 95% deviation between methods was of ±16%. Parity had the most significant effect on the bias between methods; operator and maternal weight had no significant effect. CONCLUSIONS: Supervised measurement of fetal weight by residents demonstrated high accuracy. Parity bias may be associated with visceral fat deposition independent of maternal weight gain. A methodology for medical evaluation is presented.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Undetected high-risk conditions in pregnancy are a leading cause of perinatal mortality in low-income and middle-income countries. A key contributor to adverse perinatal outcomes in these settings is limited access to high-quality screening and timely referral to care. Recently, a low-cost one-dimensional Doppler ultrasound (1-D DUS) device was developed that front-line workers in rural Guatemala used to collect quality maternal and fetal data. Further, we demonstrated with retrospective preliminary data that 1-D DUS signal could be processed using artificial intelligence and deep-learning algorithms to accurately estimate fetal gestational age, intrauterine growth and maternal blood pressure. This protocol describes a prospective observational pregnancy cohort study designed to prospectively evaluate these preliminary findings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective observational cohort study conducted in rural Guatemala. In this study, we will follow pregnant women (N =700) recruited prior to 18 6/7 weeks gestation until their delivery and early postpartum period. During pregnancy, trained nurses will collect data on prenatal risk factors and obstetrical care. Every 4 weeks, the research team will collect maternal weight, blood pressure and 1-D DUS recordings of fetal heart tones. Additionally, we will conduct three serial obstetric ultrasounds to evaluate for fetal growth restriction (FGR), and one postpartum visit to record maternal blood pressure and neonatal weight and length. We will compare the test characteristics (receiver operator curves) of 1-D DUS algorithms developed by deep-learning methods to two-dimensional fetal ultrasound survey and published clinical pre-eclampsia risk prediction algorithms for predicting FGR and pre-eclampsia, respectively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Results of this study will be disseminated at scientific conferences and through peer-reviewed articles. Deidentified data sets will be made available through public repositories. The study has been approved by the institutional ethics committees of Maya Health Alliance and Emory University.
Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Retardo do Crescimento Fetal , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Ultrassonografia Doppler , Humanos , Gravidez , Feminino , Pré-Eclâmpsia/diagnóstico por imagem , Pré-Eclâmpsia/diagnóstico , Guatemala , Retardo do Crescimento Fetal/diagnóstico por imagem , Retardo do Crescimento Fetal/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Ultrassonografia Doppler/métodos , População Rural , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal/métodos , Adulto , Idade Gestacional , Aprendizado Profundo , HipertensãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the self-reported perception of obstetric medical teams regarding the practice of delivering bad news in public and private hospitals. METHODS: Cross-sectional study considering physicians delivering obstetric care at the Municipal Hospital Vila Santa Catarina, Municipal Hospital Dr. Moysés Deutsch, and Albert Einstein Israelite Hospital, in São Paulo, Brazil. The applied questionnaire reflected the steps of the SPIKES protocol for delivering difficult news, with the questions adapted to obstetric and fetal medicine practice context. RESULTS: Specialists self-reported higher levels of knowledge, better emotional management, and superior strategy planning and summarization skills than residents. Participants with more than five years of experience reported higher knowledge levels, better emotional management, and superior strategy development skills. When comparing professionals from private and public hospitals, no significant differences emerged in self-reported communication aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Experience duration significantly influences professionals' impressions in their ability to provide information, manage emotions, and plan post-diagnosis. Specialists and those with more years of experience self-report enhanced readiness in executing communication steps effectively. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Our findings underscore the importance of tailored training and experience in navigating sensitive medical conversations in the field of Obstetrics.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Obstetrícia , Revelação da Verdade , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Gravidez , Adulto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Brasil , Relações Médico-Paciente , Atenção Terciária à Saúde , Masculino , Médicos/psicologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Equipe de Assistência ao PacienteRESUMO
Locally advanced cervical cancer poses a significant challenge to fertility-sparing treatments. Pelvic radiotherapy impairs reproductive potential owing to ovarian, uterine, and endometrial side effects. This study presents a literature review of the main fertility-sparing therapeutic alternatives for locally advanced cervical cancer and a case report of the first childbirth following uterine transposition for gynecological malignancies.
RESUMO
Objective: Eclampsia is a hypertensive disorder that occurs during pregnancy and can lead to death. The literature has gaps by not providing comprehensive data on the epidemiology of the disease, restricting analysis to limited temporal intervals and geographical locations. This study aims to characterize the epidemiological profile of women who died from eclampsia in Brazil from 2000 to 2021. Methods: The maternal mortality data were obtained from the Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade, with the following variables of interest selected: "Federative Unit," "Year," "Age Range," "Race/Color," and "Education Level." The collection of the number of live births for data normalization was conducted in the Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism, calculating odds ratio for variables and fixing number of deaths per 100,000 live births for calculating maternal mortality ratio (MMR). Results: There was a downward trend in maternal mortality rate during the study period. Maranhão stood out as the federative unit with the highest MMR (17 deaths per 100.000 live births). Mothers aged between 40 and 49 years (OR = 3.55, CI: 3.11-4.05) presents higher MMR. Additionally, black women showed the highest MMR (OR = 4.67, CI: 4.18-5.22), as well as mothers with no educational background (OR = 5.83, CI: 4.82-7.06). Conclusion: The epidemiological profile studied is predominantly composed of mothers with little or no formal education, self-declared as Black, residing in needy states and with advanced aged. These data are useful for formulating public policies aimed at combating the issue.
Assuntos
Eclampsia , Mortalidade Materna , Humanos , Feminino , Brasil/epidemiologia , Eclampsia/mortalidade , Eclampsia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Gravidez , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Mortalidade Materna/tendências , AdolescenteRESUMO
Introdução:A conjuntura socioeconômica e cultural da mulher negra a coloca em tripla vulnerabilidade, que se explica pelo fato de que ela é vítima do racismo, do preconceito de classe e da discriminação de gênero, e essa interação de diferentes tipos de opressão é explicada pela teoria da interseccionalidade. Esse negligenciamento precariza-se ainda mais quando se reporta para a atenção àsaúde. Objetivo:Compreender como o contexto social da interseccionalidade de raça, classe e gênero refletem no atendimento obstétrico em Saúde Pública de mulheres negras residentes em comunidade quilombola. Metodologia:Trata-se de pesquisa qualitativa de caráter descritivo-exploratório, realizada com duas mulheres negras residentes em comunidade quilombola, localizada em município no interior do estado do Ceará. Como instrumento para coleta de dados, utilizou-se a entrevista semiestruturada, sendo os dados submetidos à análise do discurso. Resultados:Os sujeitos desta investigação conseguem, a partir de situações do quotidiano vivenciadas nos serviços de saúde públicos, identificar exemplos de racismo e/ou preconceito relacionados ao fato de serem mulheres negras e pobres. Assim, a vulnerabilidade interseccional (raça gênero classe social) implica em desigualdades no acesso aos serviços de saúde, o que se materializa em violência obstétrica, negligência em relação ao direito da mulher negra sobre o próprio corpo, além de negação da sua subjetividade, o que viola os pressupostos do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), particularmente os princípios da universalidade, equidade e integralidade da assistência. Conclusões:Constata-se, portanto, que as iniquidades quanto ao atendimento obstétrico, que afetam majoritariamente as mulheres negras e pobres, apresentam-se como problemática de gestão, denotando o déficit na efetivação de políticas públicas de saúde, ou a sua ausência. Há também a necessidade de que os profissionais de saúde, a partir de educação continuada, tenham um olhar mais holístico, a fim de produzir um atendimento equânime e integral (AU).
Introduction:Black women's socioeconomic and cultural conjuncture puts them into a three-fold vulnerability, which is explained by the fact that they are victims of racism, class prejudice and gender discrimination, and this interaction of different types of oppression is explained by the theory of intersectionality. Such negligence is even more precarious when it comes to healthcare. Objective:To understand how the social context of the intersectionality of race, class and gender reflects on the obstetric care in public healthcare provided to black women residing in quilombola communities. Methodology:This is a qualitative research work of a descriptive-exploratory nature, carried out with two black women residing in a quilombola community located in the a rural areain the state of Ceará. As a data collection instrument, we used semi-structured interviews, and the data was submitted to discourse analysis. Results:The subjects of this investigation can, from daily situations experienced in public healthcare services,identify examples of racism and/or prejudice related to the fact that they are poor black women. Therefore, intersectional vulnerability (race gender social class) leads to inequalities in the access to healthcare services, which materializes as obstetric violence, negligence to black women's right to their own bodies, as well as denial of their subjectivity, which violates the presuppositions of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), especially the principles of universality, equity, and integrality of care. Conclusions:It is therefore verified that the inequities of obstetric care, which mostly affect poor black women, present themselves as a management problem, denoting the deficit in the application of public healthcare policies, or their absence. There is also a need for healthcare providers, through continued education, to have a more holistic view in order to provide more equanimous and integral healthcare (AU).
Introducción:La coyuntura socioeconómica y cultural de la mujer negra la coloca en una triple vulnerabilidad, que se explica por el hecho de que es víctima del racismo, del prejuicio de clase y de la discriminación de género, y esa interacción de diferentes tipos de opresión es explicada por la teoría dela interseccionalidad. Esta negligencia se precariza mucho más cuando se trata de la atención médica. Objetivo:Comprender cómo el contexto social de la interseccionalidad de raza, clase y género se refleja en la atención obstétrica en la Salud Pública de mujeres negras que viven en una comunidad quilombola. Metodología:Investigación cualitativa de carácter descriptivo-exploratorio, realizada con dos mujeres negras residentes en comunidad quilombola, Ceará, Brazil. Para la recolección de datos, se utilizaron entrevistas semiestructuradas y los datos fueron sometidos a análisis del discurso. Resultados:Los sujetos son capaces, a partir de situaciones vividas en los servicios públicos de salud, de identificar ejemplos de racismo y/o prejuicios por el hecho de ser mujeres negras y pobres. Así, la vulnerabilidad interseccional (raza género clase social) implica en desigualdades en el acceso a los servicios de salud, que se materializan en violencia obstétrica, negligencia en relación a los derechos de las mujeres negras sobre sus propios cuerpos, además de la negación de su subjetividad, que viola los supuestos del Sistema Único de Salud, en particular los principios de universalidad, equidad e integralidad de la atención. Conclusiones: Se puede observar que las inequidades en la atención obstétrica, que afectanmayormente a mujeres negras y pobres, se presentan como un problema de gestión, denotando el déficit en la implementación de políticas públicas de salud, o su ausencia. También es necesario que los profesionales de la salud, basados en la educación continua, tengan una visión más holística, para producir una atención equitativa e integral (AU).
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Classe Social , População Negra , Racismo , Quilombolas , Política de Saúde , Obstetrícia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Epidemiologia Descritiva , Gestantes , Serviços Públicos de Saúde/políticas , Serviços de Saúde MaternaAssuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Hipoglicemiantes , Insulina , Humanos , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Feminino , Gravidez , Argentina/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
Objectives: To determine if there is an association between the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) diagnosed and treated in a Spanish population. Material and methods: Retrospective cohort of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who had neutrophil and lymphocyte values in complete blood count before the histopathological diagnosis and survival of at least three months, in an intermediate complexity hospital. Convenience sampling. Measured variables included age, menopausal stage, parity, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, treatment type, residual tumor, lymph node involvement, presence of ascites, cytology, histologic type, differentiation grade, and CA-125 values. Additionally, outcomes, overall survival, disease/progression-free survival were also measured. Bivariate inferential and Cox regression analyses were performed. Results: Out of 78 candidates, 60 women with EOC were included. Of them, 24 (40%) had a low NLR (≤ 2,9) while 36 (60%) had a high NLR (> 2,9). An association was found between high NLR levels and suboptimal cytoreductive surgery. High NLR ratios were associated with lower overall survival (Hazard ratio (HR): 4.1; 95% CI: 1.4-11.8) and lower 5-year disease-free survival (HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.2-5.7). Conclusions: A plasma neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio of more than 2.9 was associated with poor prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in our setting. There is a need to establish the optimal cut-off point and conduct prospective studies with larger patient numbers in order to support this information.
Objetivos: evaluar si hay asociación entre los valores del cociente plasmático neutrófilos/ linfocitos (NLR) y el pronóstico en pacientes con cáncer epitelial de ovario (CEO) diagnosticadas y tratadas en una población española. Materiales y métodos: cohorte retrospectiva de pacientes con cáncer epitelial de ovario que tuvieran un recuento de neutrófilos y linfocitos en hemograma previo al diagnóstico histopatológico en un hospital de nivel medio de complejidad y posterior sobrevida de, al menos, 3 meses. Muestreo por conveniencia. Se midieron: edad, estado menopáusico, paridad, estadio Federación International de Ginecología y Obstetricia (FIGO), tipo de tratamiento, tumor residual, afectación ganglionar, presencia de ascitis, citología, tipo histológico, grado de diferenciación y cifras de CA-125; como desenlaces, sobrevida global y sobrevida libre de enfermedad o progresión. Análisis inferencial bivariado y por regresión de Cox. Resultados: de 78 candidatas, ingresaron 60 mujeres con CEO. De ellas, 24 (40%) presentaron un NLR bajo (≤ 2,9) y 36 (60 %) elevado (> 2,9). Se encontró asociación entre los niveles altos de NLR y cirugía citoreductora subóptima. Los niveles altos de NLR se asociaron a menor sobrevida global (Hazard ratio (HR): 4,1; IC 95%: 1,4-11,8) y menor sobrevida libre de enfermedad a los 5 años (HR:2,6; IC 95 %: 1,2-5,7). Conclusiones: un cociente plasmático neutrófilos/linfocitos mayor de 2,9 se asoció a un mal pronóstico en pacientes con cáncer epitelial de ovario en nuestro medio. Se necesita determinar el punto de corte óptimo y realizar estudios prospectivos con mayor número de pacientes que avalen esta información.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Linfócitos , Neutrófilos , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/sangue , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/sangue , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/mortalidade , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/patologia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linfócitos/patologia , Idoso , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Espanha/epidemiologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Contagem de Linfócitos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Período Pré-Operatório , Contagem de LeucócitosRESUMO
Dystocia is a common complication in guinea pig pregnancies, presenting significant challenges in clinical management. The present case report describes the presentation, diagnosis, and surgical intervention in an 8 months old female guinea pig with dystocia. The subject is a primiparous guinea pig originating from a commercial breeder, exhibited prolonged labor with two pups, one of which was stillborn. Physical examination revealed a distended abdomen, lack of uterine contractions, signs of distress, and vulvar discharge. Radiographic and ultrasound tests confirmed obstruction due to large fetal size and mineralization of the pubic symphysis. Surgical intervention proceeded with a ventral midline approach, ovariohysterectomy and removal of three fetuses. The guinea pig recovered well from the procedure, being discharged with postoperative care, and the use of anti-inflammatory, analgesics, prokinetics, antibiotics as well as scopolamine. The objective of the present work is to discuss and emphasize the importance of veterinary intervention, diagnostic evaluation and therapeutics for the multifactorial nature of dystocia management. Despite the surgical treatment, the prognosis for both dam and offspring remains guarded, highlighting the need for early detection and intervention to optimize outcomes in guinea pig dystocia cases.
A distocia é uma complicação comum em gestações de porquinhas-da-índia, apresentando desafios significativos no manejo clínico. Este relato de caso descreve a apresentação, diagnóstico e intervenção cirúrgica em uma porca-da-índia fêmea de oito meses que estava experimentando distocia. A porquinha-da-índia, primípara e proveniente de um criador comercial, apresentou trabalho de parto prolongado com dois filhotes, um dos quais nasceu natimorto. O exame físico revelou abdome distendido, falta de contrações uterinas, sinais de angústia e secreção vulvar. Exames radiográficos e de ultrassom confirmaram obstrução devido ao tamanho fetal grande e mineralização da sínfise púbica. A intervenção cirúrgica prosseguiu com uma abordagem ventral na linha média, ovariohisterectomia e remoção de três fetos. A paciente se recuperou bem do procedimento e recebeu alta com cuidados pós-operatórios, incluindo o uso de anti-inflamatórios, analgésicos, pró-cinéticos, antibióticos e escopolamina. O objetivo deste trabalho é discutir e destacar a importância da intervenção veterinária, avaliação diagnóstica e terapêutica na natureza multifatorial do manejo da distocia. Apesar do tratamento cirúrgico, o prognóstico tanto para a mãe quanto para a prole permanece reservado, ressaltando a necessidade de detecção e intervenção precoces para otimizar os resultados em casos de distocia em porquinhas-da-índia.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between perinatal and obstetric factors as potential triggers for the early onset of T1DM. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study enrolling 409 patients diagnosed with T1DM, in Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil, from 1981 to 2023. Data were retrieved from medical records, regarding sociodemographic parameters as age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Perinatal and obstetric factors as delivery type, gestational age, filiation order, length of exclusive breastfeeding, maternal age, maternal and fetal blood types, and occurrence of maternal gestational diabetes were also analyzed. An adapted survival analysis was employed to gauge the impact of each assessed variable at the age of T1DM diagnosis. RESULTS: The median age of T1DM diagnosis was 10.3 years with an interquartile range between 6.4 and 15.5 years. Delivery type and filiation order were the only factors statistically significantly associated with an early age at T1DM diagnosis. Patients who were born through cesarean section and who were firstborns showed a 28.6 and 18.0â¯% lower age at T1DM diagnosis, respectively, compared to those born through vaginal delivery and those that were nonfirstborns. CONCLUSIONS: Being born by cesarean section and being firstborn showed to be statistically significant factors to determine an early T1DM diagnosis.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Humanos , Feminino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Adolescente , Gravidez , Criança , Brasil/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Idade de Início , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Idade Materna , Seguimentos , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Prognóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Recém-Nascido , Adulto , Idade Gestacional , Lactente , Estudos de CoortesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There are no globally agreed on strategies on early detection and first response management of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) during and after caesarean birth. Our study aimed to develop an international expert's consensus on evidence-based approaches for early detection and obstetric first response management of PPH intraoperatively and postoperatively in caesarean birth. DESIGN: Systematic review and three-stage modified Delphi expert consensus. SETTING: International. POPULATION: Panel of 22 global experts in PPH with diverse backgrounds, and gender, professional and geographic balance. OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement or disagreement on strategies for early detection and first response management of PPH at caesarean birth. RESULTS: Experts agreed that the same PPH definition should apply to both vaginal and caesarean birth. For the intraoperative phase, the experts agreed that early detection should be accomplished via quantitative blood loss measurement, complemented by monitoring the woman's haemodynamic status; and that first response should be triggered once the woman loses at least 500 mL of blood with continued bleeding or when she exhibits clinical signs of haemodynamic instability, whichever occurs first. For the first response, experts agreed on immediate administration of uterotonics and tranexamic acid, examination to determine aetiology and rapid initiation of cause-specific responses. In the postoperative phase, the experts agreed that caesarean birth-related PPH should be detected primarily via frequently monitoring the woman's haemodynamic status and clinical signs and symptoms of internal bleeding, supplemented by cumulative blood loss assessment performed quantitatively or by visual estimation. Postoperative first response was determined to require an individualised approach. CONCLUSION: These agreed on proposed approaches could help improve the detection of PPH in the intraoperative and postoperative phases of caesarean birth and the first response management of intraoperative PPH. Determining how best to implement these strategies is a critical next step.
Assuntos
Cesárea , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Hemorragia Pós-Parto , Humanos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/terapia , Feminino , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Precoce , Ácido Tranexâmico/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the profile and professional trajectory of the obstetrics and gynecology (ObGyn) graduates over the past decade, at a referral university hospital. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted, utilizing a survey that targeted graduates of the ObGyn residency program from the last decade, asking about demographics, medical undergraduate, residency details, post-residency trajectory, satisfaction levels, and social media usage. A descriptive analysis was performed. Comparative analyses, including gender-based differences, were assessed using chi-squared or Fisher exact tests (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Among 126 graduates, 84 agreed to participate (66.67%), predominantly comprising females with an average age of 33 years. Most identified themselves as white. The majority had pursued their undergraduate studies at the same institution (78.6%) and subsequently acquired specialized titles in ObGyn from the national society. Most of them were employed in both public and private sectors (71.08%). Male graduates held the majority of medical shifts in obstetrics. A significant gender-based salary discrepancy was noted, favoring males. More than half of the professionals utilized social media for work-related purposes. Many expressed the necessity for supplementary education beyond public health, particularly career management. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight a predominance of female and white individuals among the graduates. Overall, graduates expressed contentment with their education and professional engagements. A gender-based income disparity was identified, favoring male graduates. Studies like this can provide insights for improving medical residency education.
Assuntos
Ginecologia , Internato e Residência , Obstetrícia , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Obstetrícia/educação , Ginecologia/educação , Estudos Transversais , Adulto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Satisfação no Emprego , Mídias Sociais/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Critical pregnancy at high altitudes increases morbidity and mortality from 2500â¯m above sea level. In addition to altitude, there are other influential factors such as social inequalities, cultural, prehospital barriers, and lack the appropriate development of healthcare infrastructure. The most frequent causes of critical pregnancy leading to admission to Intensive Care Units are pregnancy hypertensive disorders (native residents seem to be more protected), hemorrhages and infection/sepsis. In Latin America, there are 32 Intensive Care Units above 2500â¯m above sea level. Arterial blood gases at altitude are affected by changes in barometric pressure. The analysis of their values provides very useful information for the management of obstetric emergencies at very high altitude, especially respiratory and metabolic pathologies.
Assuntos
Altitude , Complicações na Gravidez , Humanos , Gravidez , América Latina/epidemiologia , Feminino , Doença da Altitude , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez , Estado Terminal , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , GasometriaRESUMO
Objective: To determine the prevalence of anxiety, depression and burnout in residents of Gynecology and Obstetrics during COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and its associated factors. Methods: Cross-sectional study involving all regions of Brazil, through the application of a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) and the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-HSS) instrument. Multivariate analysis was performed after adjusting the Poisson model. Results: Among the 719 participating medical residents, screening was positive for anxiety in 75.7% and for depression in 49.8% of cases. Burnout syndrome was evidenced in 41.3% of the physicians studied. Those with depression are more likely to have anxiety (OR 0.797; 95%CI 0.687 - 0.925) and burnout syndrome (OR 0.847 95%CI 0.74 - 0.97). Residents with anxiety (OR 0.805; 95%CI 0.699 - 0.928) and burnout (OR 0.841; 95%CI 0.734 - 0.963) are more likely to have depression. Conclusion: High prevalence of anxiety, depression and burnout were found in residents of Gynecology and Obstetrics in Brazil, in addition to important correlations between anxiety-depression and depression-burnout.
Assuntos
Ansiedade , Esgotamento Profissional , COVID-19 , Depressão , Ginecologia , Internato e Residência , Obstetrícia , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Depressão/epidemiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Adulto , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pandemias , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the psychiatric diagnoses and treatments of patients admitted to the high-risk obstetric service who underwent a consultation with a liaison psychiatrist. METHODS: A descriptive observational study that included pregnant women from the high-risk obstetric service of a highly specialised clinic in Medellín, who had a liaison psychiatry consultation between 2013 and 2017. The main variables of interest were psychiatric and obstetric diagnoses and treatments, in addition to biopsychosocial risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 361 medical records were screened, with 248 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The main prevailing psychiatric diagnosis was major depressive disorder (29%), followed by adaptive disorder (21.8%) and anxiety disorders (12.5%). The pharmacologic treatments most used by the psychiatry service were SSRI antidepressants (24.2%), trazodone (6.8%) and benzodiazepines (5.2%). The most common primary obstetric diagnosis was spontaneous delivery (46.4%), and the predominant secondary obstetric diagnoses were hypertensive disorder associated with pregnancy (10.4%), gestational diabetes (9.2%) and recurrent abortions (6.4%). Overall, 71.8% of the patients had a high biopsychosocial risk. CONCLUSIONS: The studied population's primary psychiatric disorders were major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder and anxiety disorders, which implies the importance of timely recognition of the symptoms of these perinatal mental pathologies, together with obstetric and social risks, in the prenatal consultation. Psychiatric intervention should be encouraged considering the negative implications of high biopsychosocial risk in both mothers and children.
Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais , Complicações na Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Adulto , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/psicologia , Adulto Jovem , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Transtornos de Adaptação/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Adaptação/diagnóstico , Gravidez de Alto RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Conflicting evidence for the association between COVID-19 and adverse perinatal outcomes exists. This study examined the associations between maternal COVID-19 during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes including preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA) and fetal death; as well as whether the associations differ by trimester of infection. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study used a retrospective Mexican birth cohort from the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Mexico, between January 2020 and November 2021. PARTICIPANTS: We used the social security administrative dataset from IMSS that had COVID-19 information and linked it with the IMSS routine hospitalisation dataset, to identify deliveries in the study period with a test for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy. OUTCOME MEASURES: PTB, LBW, SGA, LGA and fetal death. We used targeted maximum likelihood estimators, to quantify associations (risk ratio, RR) and CIs. We fit models for the overall COVID-19 sample, and separately for those with mild or severe disease, and by trimester of infection. Additionally, we investigated potential bias induced by missing non-tested pregnancies. RESULTS: The overall sample comprised 17 340 singleton pregnancies, of which 30% tested positive. We found that those with mild COVID-19 had an RR of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.99) for PTB and those with severe COVID-19 had an RR of 1.53 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.19) for LGA. COVID-19 in the first trimester was associated with fetal death, RR=2.36 (95% CI 1.04, 5.36). Results also demonstrate that missing non-tested pregnancies might induce bias in the associations. CONCLUSIONS: In the overall sample, there was no evidence of an association between COVID-19 and adverse perinatal outcomes. However, the findings suggest that severe COVID-19 may increase the risk of some perinatal outcomes, with the first trimester potentially being a high-risk period.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Nascimento Prematuro , Gravidez , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , México/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Retardo do Crescimento Fetal/epidemiologia , Morte Fetal , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Neonatal mortality is a global public health challenge. Guatemala has the fifth highest neonatal mortality rate in Latin America, and Indigenous communities are particularly impacted. This study aims to understand factors driving neonatal mortality rates among Maya Kaqchikel communities. METHODS: We used sequential explanatory mixed methods. The quantitative phase was a secondary analysis of 2014-2016 data from the Global Maternal and Newborn Health Registry from Chimaltenango, Guatemala. Multivariate logistic regression models identified factors associated with perinatal and late neonatal mortality. A number of 33 in-depth interviews were conducted with mothers, traditional Maya midwives and local healthcare professionals to explain quantitative findings. RESULTS: Of 33 759 observations, 351 were lost to follow-up. There were 32 559 live births, 670 stillbirths (20/1000 births), 1265 (38/1000 births) perinatal deaths and 409 (12/1000 live births) late neonatal deaths. Factors identified to have statistically significant associations with a higher risk of perinatal or late neonatal mortality include lack of maternal education, maternal height <140 cm, maternal age under 20 or above 35, attending less than four antenatal visits, delivering without a skilled attendant, delivering at a health facility, preterm birth, congenital anomalies and presence of other obstetrical complications. Qualitative participants linked severe mental and emotional distress and inadequate maternal nutrition to heightened neonatal vulnerability. They also highlighted that mistrust in the healthcare system-fueled by language barriers and healthcare workers' use of coercive authority-delayed hospital presentations. They provided examples of cooperative relationships between traditional midwives and healthcare staff that resulted in positive outcomes. CONCLUSION: Structural social forces influence neonatal vulnerability in rural Guatemala. When coupled with healthcare system shortcomings, these forces increase mistrust and mortality. Collaborative relationships among healthcare staff, traditional midwives and families may disrupt this cycle.
Assuntos
Indígenas Centro-Americanos , Morte Perinatal , Nascimento Prematuro , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Humanos , Guatemala , Mortalidade Infantil , MãesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The "Adequate Childbirth Program" (PPA) is a quality improvement project that aims to reduce the high rates of unnecessary cesarean section in Brazilian private hospitals. This study aimed to analyze labor and childbirth care practices after the first phase of PPA implementation. METHOD: This study uses a qualitative approach. Eight hospitals were selected. At each hospital, during the period of 5 (five) days, from July to October 2017, the research team conducted face to face interviews with doctors (n = 21) and nurses (n = 28), using semi-structured scripts. For the selection of professionals, the Snowball technique was used. The interviews were transcribed, and the data submitted to Thematic Content Analysis, using the MaxQda software. RESULTS: The three analytical dimensions of the process of change in the care model: (1) Incorporation of care practices: understood as the practices that have been included since PPA implementation; (2) Adaptation of care practices: understood as practices carried out prior to PPA implementation, but which underwent modifications with the implementation of the project; (3) Rejection of care practices: understood as those practices that were abandoned or questioned whether or not they should be carried out by hospital professionals. CONCLUSIONS: After the PPA, changes were made in hospitals and in the way, women were treated. Birth planning, prenatal hospital visits led by experts (for expecting mothers and their families), diet during labor, pharmacological analgesia for vaginal delivery, skin-to-skin contact, and breastfeeding in the first hour of life are all included. To better monitor labor and vaginal birth and to reduce CS without a clinical justification, hospitals adjusted their present practices. Finally, the professionals rejected the Kristeller maneuver since research has demonstrated that using it's harmful.
Brazil has high Cesarean Section (CS) rates, with rates far from the ideal recommended by the World Health Organization and a model of care that does not favor women's autonomy and empowerment. In 2015, a quality improvement project, called "Projeto Parto Adequado" (PPA), was implemented in Brazilian private hospitals to reduce unnecessary cesarean section, in addition to encouraging the process of natural and safe childbirth. One of the components of this project was to reorganize the model of care in hospitals to prepare professionals for humanized and safe care. The data were collected in 8 hospitals with interviews with 49 professionals, approximately two years after the beginning of the project in the hospitals. There were changes in the hospital routine and in the care of women after the project. The professionals incorporated practices such as skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding; diet during labor; non-invasive care technologies, especially to relieve pain during labor; birth plan; pregnancy courses with guided tours in hospitals (for pregnant women and family); and analgesia for vaginal labor. There was adaptation of existing practices in hospitals to reduce CS that had no clinical indication; better monitoring of labor, favoring vaginal delivery. And finally, the professionals rejected the practice that presses the uterine fundus, for not having shown efficacy in recent studies. We can conclude that the hospitals that participated in this study have made an effort to change their obstetric model. However, specific aspects of each hospital, the organization of the health system in Brazil, and the incentive of the local administration influenced the implementation of these changes by professionals in practice.